Skip navigation
Prison Legal News
× You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.

Parole Change Violates Ex Post Facto Clause

Loaded on April 15, 1996 published in Prison Legal News April, 1996, page 7
Filed under: Sentencing, Ex Post Facto, Parole. Location: Maryland.
In the July, 1995, issue of PLN we reported the supreme court's ruling in Morales v. California Department of Correction, 115 S.Ct. 1597 (1995) which held that legislatively extending the time in which a prisoner can appear before a parole board does not violate the ex post facto clause. The ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Microsoft Out-Cells Competition, by Dan Pens
  2. The Keepers and the Caged: Heroes and Necromancers in the Prison System Today (Book Review), by Michael Spencer
  3. Racist Guards at Florida Prison, by Dan Pens
  4. From the Editor, by Dan Pens
  5. Prison Population Statistics Available
  6. Not All Prisoner Lawsuits Are Frivolous, by Jon O Newman
  7. Iowa Supreme Court: Hearing Required Before Prisoner Funds Seized
  8. $55,540 in Attorney Fees for RFRA Suit
  9. Parole Change Violates Ex Post Facto Clause
  10. Washington DOC Enjoined from Taking Blood
  11. Grievance Discipline Struck Down
  12. Disciplinary Findings Must State Evidence Relied On
  13. Oklahoma Pre-Parole Status Creates Liberty Interest
  14. Exploitation of Ohio Prison Labor, by William Ridenour
  15. Grievance Retaliation Unlawful
  16. Jury Not Waived in "Doubtful Situation"
  17. Peruvian POWs Rescued
  18. Genital Groping States Claim
  19. Michigan ACLU Protests Religious Prison College
  20. Seventh Circuit Decides "Mail Box" Rule
  21. Damn Lies and Statistics
  22. Georgia Prisons Enter Dark Ages
  23. Michigan Consent Decree Not Changed
  24. Arizona's New Tin Horn Dictator, by O'Neil Stough
  25. RFRA Applies to Retaliation Claims
  26. Pelican Bay Psychiatrists Resign in Protest
  27. Jailhouse Lawyers Retain Right to Assist Prisoners
  28. Texas Guard Killed by Riot Shield
  29. No Jurisdiction for Some Qualified Immunity Appeals
  30. Permanent Injunction Issued in Madrid
  31. $460,800 Verdict in Ohio Beating Affirmed
  32. Discrimination Dismissal Reversed
  33. Administrative Reversal of Disciplinary Sanction Doesn't Bar Suit
  34. Fourth Circuit Rules on IFP Statute, Again
  35. Sandin Inapplicable to Detainee Disciplinary Claims
  36. $150,000 Jury Award in Beating Case Affirmed
  37. News in Brief
  38. Tuberculosis TRO Issued

More from these topics: