×
You have 2 more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
Supreme Court Rulings Trickle Down: Washington Civil Commitment
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Young v. Weston
Year | 1997 |
---|---|
Cite | 122 F.3d 38 (9th Cir. 1997) |
Level | Court of Appeals |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Young v. Weston, 122 F.3d 38 (9th Cir. 08/05/1997)
[Editor's note: footnotes (if any) trail the opinion]
FOR PUBLICATION
[1] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[2] ANDRE BRIGHAM YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
[3] DAVID WESTON, Superintendent of the Special Commitment Center, Respondent-Appellant.
[4] No. 95-35958
[5] D.C. No. CV-94-00480-C
[6] ORDER
[7] On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
[8] Filed August 5, 1997
[9] Before: Betty B. Fletcher, John T. Noonan, and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges
[10] ORDER
[11] We remand this case to the district court for reconsideration in light of Kansas v. Hendricks, _______ S. Ct. _______ (U.S. June 23, 1997).
[12] REMANDED.
[Editor's note: Illustrations from the original opinion, if any, are available in the print version]
19970805
122 F.3d 38, 1997.C09.1358
Young v. Weston, 122 F.3d 38 (9th Cir. 08/05/1997)
[Editor's note: footnotes (if any) trail the opinion]
FOR PUBLICATION
[1] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[2] ANDRE BRIGHAM YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
[3] DAVID WESTON, Superintendent of the Special Commitment Center, Respondent-Appellant.
[4] No. 95-35958
[5] D.C. No. CV-94-00480-C
[6] ORDER
[7] On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
[8] Filed August 5, 1997
[9] Before: Betty B. Fletcher, John T. Noonan, and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges
[10] ORDER
[11] We remand this case to the district court for reconsideration in light of Kansas v. Hendricks, _______ S. Ct. _______ (U.S. June 23, 1997).
[12] REMANDED.
[Editor's note: Illustrations from the original opinion, if any, are available in the print version]
19970805
122 F.3d 38, 1997.C09.1358