×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Massachusetts Court Avoids Ruling on Consent Decree Termination
Loaded on June 15, 1997
published in Prison Legal News
June, 1997, page 9
A federal district court in Massachusetts avoided ruling on the constitutionality of the Prison Litigation Reform Act's (PLRA) provisions requiring immediate termination of jail and prison consent decrees, 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b)(2), by refusing to vacate a jail consent decree but instead holding the decree would no longer be enforced ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- America's Private Gulag, by Ken Silverstein
- Speedy Death Penalty Provisions Enjoined in California
- Strange Bedfellows; CCA's Political Connections, by Alex Friedmann
- Texas Sheriff Exploits Prisoner Labor
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Grievance Retaliation Unconstitutional
- Qualified Immunity for Strip Search
- PLRA Not Enough for Fourth Circuit
- Sixth Circuit Issues PLRA IFP Order
- Fifth Circuit Holds that PLRA Requires Fees in All Pending Cases
- Ninth Circuit: PLRA Doesn't Apply to Habeas
- Massachusetts Court Avoids Ruling on Consent Decree Termination
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics (Declaratory Relief), by John Midgley
- Federal Parolees Kicked off Internet
- Texas Prison Building Corruption, Problems and Dangers
- A Matter of Fact
- Jury Verdict in Prisoner Attack Affirmed
- On the Edge of Midnight, by Mr Wolf
- CDC Consent Decree Contempt Vacated
- California Prisoner Wins Judgment Against Guard in Shooting
- PLN Readers Dissatisfied with Freedom Press
- California Slave Labor Loses Money
- Denial of Eyeglasses Violates Eighth Amendment
- Swastika Carved on CDC Prison Guard Rifle
- Illinois Jail Conditions Suit States Claim
- FTCA Suit Not Barred by Prior Bivens Claim
- Trial Required on ADA EFV Claim
- California Prisoners Entitled to Contact Attorney Visits
- No Frivolousness Review Allowed When Filing Fee Paid
- Book Review - Privatization and the Provision of Correctional Services: Context and Consequences
- Iowa Retaliation Verdict Affirmed
- Pro Se Litigant Entitled to Defendant's Identity
- Relation Back Period Suspended during IFP Application
- 'Scared Straight' Youths Molested in Texas Prison
- Prison NA Meetings Violate Establishment Clause
- BOP Owes Duty of Care to Prisoners
- TB Isolation May Violate RFRA
- News in Brief
- Habeas Petition Not Mooted by Segregation Release
- BOP Can't Set Restitution
- Wisconsin RFRA Jewelry Ruling Affirmed
- Mississippi Detainees Awarded Damages in Disciplinary Suit
- Prisoners' Spouses Challenge Washington 35% Law
- Massachusetts Prisoners Awarded Back Pay
- $7,500 Awarded in Guard Beating
More from these topics:
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Finding Indiana Grievance Process “Unavailable,” Federal Judge Grants Summary Judgment to 22 Prisoners on Same Day, April 1, 2024. PLRA, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Tenth Circuit: Colorado Prisoner’s Injury Requiring Medical Treatment Not De Minimus, July 15, 2023. Failure to Treat, PLRA.
- After Eleventh Circuit Says ICE Detainee Is Not “Prisoner” Subject to PLRA, He Goes Missing from Georgia, March 1, 2023. PLRA, Detainers.
- Eighth Circuit Says Judge Dismissing Claim of Federal Prisoner in Arkansas Was Premature in Counting It a PLRA ‘Strike’, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Eleventh Circuit Says No PLRA ‘Strike’ for Dismissal of Case Removed From State to Federal Court, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Third Circuit Says Mixed Dismissal of Civil Rights Action Not a Strike Under PLRA, April 1, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Civilly Detained Sex Offender Plaintiff Proceeding In Forma Pauperis Not a Prisoner Under PLRA, Dec. 1, 2021. PLRA, Sex Offender Classification.
- Seventh Circuit: PLRA Mandates Dismissal for Deceit on IFP Application, Sept. 1, 2021. PLRA, Indigent Defense, False Statements/Perjury.
- Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Prisoner's Non-Prison Lawsuit Under PLRA's 3-Strikes Rule, Even Though Unrelated to Prison Conditions, March 15, 2020. Totality of Conditions, PLRA, Three Strikes.