×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Experiment in Access: Law Libraries Eliminated in Arizona Prisons
Loaded on Oct. 15, 1997
by O'Neil Stough
published in Prison Legal News
October, 1997, page 1
The August 1996, issue of PLN reported Lewis v. Casey, 116 S.Ct. 2174 (1996). The Lewis court, though not explicitly overturning Bounds v. Smith, 430 US 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491 (1977), redefined the meaning of "court access" as it applies to prisoners. The Bounds court held that prison officials are ...
Filed under:
Attorney Client,
Law Library Access/Adequacy,
Paralegals,
Photocopies,
Telephones,
Attorney Calls,
Legal Mail.
Location:
Arizona.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Experiment in Access: Law Libraries Eliminated in Arizona Prisons, by O'Neil Stough
- U.S. Sues Prisons in Arizona and Michigan
- A Matter of Fact
- Seventh Circuit Applies ADA to Prisoners
- Three Texas Guards Indicted in Beating Death
- ADA Suits Not Affected by PLRA Attorney Fee Caps, by John Emry
- Editorial, by Dan Pens
- No Qualified Immunity for Denial of Exercise
- Managed Care Infects Prison Health Services
- Fifth Circuit Reverses Scott
- Georgia Prison Guards Speak Out, by Dan Pens
- Senior DOC Officials Implicated
- Felon Disenfranchisement Laws Challenged in Washington
- Prison Conditions in Venezuela
- Get More Georgia Prison Information
- Mississippi Good Time Violates Ex Post Facto
- California Limits Prison Appeals, by Willie Wisely
- Filing Fee Assessed in Dismissed Appeal
- Consent Decree Termination Provision Upheld
- Released Prisoners Must Pay Filing Fees
- PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Habeas
- Released Prisoner Must Pay Filing Fees
- PLRA Physical Harm Requirement Not Retroactive
- PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Released Prisoners
- PLRA Attorney Fee Cap Not Applicable to Pending Cases
- Arizona DOC Contempt Fines Affirmed
- Magistrates Lack Jurisdiction to Impose Contempt Sanctions
- Clemency Letter Ban Questioned
- $5,000 Verdict for Snitch Jacketing Affirmed
- Eleventh Circuit Reinstates Beating Verdict
- Court Allows Silencing of Environmental Whistle-Blower, by Paul Wright
- California Guards Set Up Prisoners, by Willie Wisely
- California, Texas, Arizona Suit Seeking Alien Incarceration Money Fails
- Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Civil Rights
- Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Habeas Corpus
- Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Court Access
- CCA Prison Off to a Rocky Start
- A Day at the Human Zoo, by Alice Lynd
- Prison Uprisings Sweep Columbia
- Free to Wardens But Not Convicts?
- Same Sex Harassment of Prisoner Workers Okayed
- LSC Ban on Funding Prison Litigation Enjoined
- Arizona Prisoner Entitled to Kosher Diet
- Sexual Abuse by Guard Nets New York Jail Prisoner $750,000
- Rhode Island Probation Fee Ruling Reversed
- News in Brief
- New York AA Program Violates Establishment Clause
More from O'Neil Stough:
- Former Arizona Governor Sentenced, July 15, 1998
- Experiment in Access: Law Libraries Eliminated in Arizona Prisons, Oct. 15, 1997
- Arizona's New Tin Horn Dictator, April 15, 1996
- Oppression on the Rise in Arizona, Aug. 15, 1994
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit: Leaman Doctrine Did Not Bar Ohio Prisoner’s Pro Se Federal Civil Rights Suit Over Interference with Legal Mail, Feb. 15, 2025. Legal Mail, Censorship, Lost Property.
- California Prisoner Awarded Over $1.26 Million in Suit Challenging Withheld Legal Mail Which Resulted in Habeas Loss, Jan. 15, 2025. Settlements, Habeas Corpus, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail.
- Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Violating Jail Phone Policy Does Not Waive Attorney-Client Privilege, Sept. 15, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney Calls.
- Washington Prisoner’s Sentence Vacated After Attorney Calls and Visits Were Recorded, Aug. 15, 2024. Attorney Client, Prisoner Privileges, Disclosure of Records, Recordings, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of.
- In New Jersey, Yet More Privileged Phone Calls Between Prisoners and Attorneys Recorded and Used by Prosecutors, July 1, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney/Client, Recorded Calls.
- Los Angeles County Makes Jail Phone Calls Free, June 1, 2024. Telephones, Telephone Rates.
- Lawsuit Over Mailroom Abuses by Washington DOC Leads to Policy Changes, June 1, 2024. Retaliation for Litigating, Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Photos, Sexually Explicit Materials, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail.
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Florida County Makes Free Jail Phone Calls Available, April 1, 2024. Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Securus.
- Eleventh Circuit Revives Claim Against Florida Jail That Forced Detainee to Scan Legal Mail Into Computer with Memory Chip, March 1, 2024. Jail Specific, Supervisory Liability, Municipal Liability, Legal Mail, First Amendment, rights, Attorney/Client.