×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
LSC Ban on Funding Prison Litigation Enjoined
Loaded on Oct. 15, 1997
published in Prison Legal News
October, 1997, page 24
In the July, 1996, issue of PLN we reported passage of the 1996 federal budget. In addition to severe budget cuts for the Legal Services Corporation (LSC), a private non profit corporation that distributes government funds to independent legal programs around the country, Congress also imposed severe limitations on how ...
Filed under:
Appointment of Counsel,
Attorney Client,
Court Access,
Preliminary Injunctions/TRO's.
Location:
Hawaii.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Experiment in Access: Law Libraries Eliminated in Arizona Prisons, by O'Neil Stough
- U.S. Sues Prisons in Arizona and Michigan
- A Matter of Fact
- Seventh Circuit Applies ADA to Prisoners
- Three Texas Guards Indicted in Beating Death
- ADA Suits Not Affected by PLRA Attorney Fee Caps, by John Emry
- Editorial, by Dan Pens
- No Qualified Immunity for Denial of Exercise
- Managed Care Infects Prison Health Services
- Fifth Circuit Reverses Scott
- Georgia Prison Guards Speak Out, by Dan Pens
- Senior DOC Officials Implicated
- Felon Disenfranchisement Laws Challenged in Washington
- Prison Conditions in Venezuela
- Get More Georgia Prison Information
- Mississippi Good Time Violates Ex Post Facto
- California Limits Prison Appeals, by Willie Wisely
- Filing Fee Assessed in Dismissed Appeal
- Consent Decree Termination Provision Upheld
- Released Prisoners Must Pay Filing Fees
- PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Habeas
- Released Prisoner Must Pay Filing Fees
- PLRA Physical Harm Requirement Not Retroactive
- PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Released Prisoners
- PLRA Attorney Fee Cap Not Applicable to Pending Cases
- Arizona DOC Contempt Fines Affirmed
- Magistrates Lack Jurisdiction to Impose Contempt Sanctions
- Clemency Letter Ban Questioned
- $5,000 Verdict for Snitch Jacketing Affirmed
- Eleventh Circuit Reinstates Beating Verdict
- Court Allows Silencing of Environmental Whistle-Blower, by Paul Wright
- California Guards Set Up Prisoners, by Willie Wisely
- California, Texas, Arizona Suit Seeking Alien Incarceration Money Fails
- Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Civil Rights
- Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Habeas Corpus
- Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Court Access
- CCA Prison Off to a Rocky Start
- A Day at the Human Zoo, by Alice Lynd
- Prison Uprisings Sweep Columbia
- Free to Wardens But Not Convicts?
- Same Sex Harassment of Prisoner Workers Okayed
- LSC Ban on Funding Prison Litigation Enjoined
- Arizona Prisoner Entitled to Kosher Diet
- Sexual Abuse by Guard Nets New York Jail Prisoner $750,000
- Rhode Island Probation Fee Ruling Reversed
- News in Brief
- New York AA Program Violates Establishment Clause
More from these topics:
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces When Deciding Defendant’s Pro Se Motion Requesting Counsel on Postconviction Review, Trial Court Must Either Deny Entire Motion or Permit All Claims If Any Have Arguable Merit, Dec. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, After Request for Counsel, Pro Se Issues.
- $25 Million Contempt Fine Prompts Release of Pretrial Detainees from Philadelphia Lockups, Dec. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Contempt (Civil Procedure), Bail/Pretrial Release, Fines.
- Seventh Circuit Lets BOP Restrict Access to Federal Register from Prison in Illinois, Dec. 15, 2024. Court Access, Administrative Procedures Act (State), Bureau of Prisons (BOP).
- Indigent Defense: Appointed Counsel Does Not Mean Free Counsel, Dec. 1, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Indigent Defense, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses.
- In Oregon Case, Ninth Circuit Limits Pretrial Detention Without Counsel to Seven Days, Nov. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Pretrial Detention and Detainees, Speedy Trial Clock - Tolling of.
- Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Violating Jail Phone Policy Does Not Waive Attorney-Client Privilege, Sept. 15, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney Calls.
- Washington Prisoner’s Sentence Vacated After Attorney Calls and Visits Were Recorded, Aug. 15, 2024. Attorney Client, Prisoner Privileges, Disclosure of Records, Recordings, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of.
- In New Jersey, Yet More Privileged Phone Calls Between Prisoners and Attorneys Recorded and Used by Prosecutors, July 1, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney/Client, Recorded Calls.
- Indiana Supreme Court Clarifies Framework for Determining When Courts May Apply Cash Bail to Public-Defender Costs and to Fines, Costs, and Fees, June 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Costs, Restitution, Bail Bonds.
- At BOP California “Rape Club” Prison: Historic Ruling, FBI Raid, Warden Removed, April 1, 2024. Staff-Prisoner Assault, DOC/BOP misconduct, Retaliation for Litigating, Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Whistleblowing, Retaliatory Searches, Retaliatory Segregation, Systemic Medical Neglect, Failure to Treat, Staffing, Preliminary Injunctions/TRO's, Special Masters, Failure to Treat (Mental Illness), Special Master.