×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Parole Change May Violate Ex Post Facto; Change Can Be Challenged Via § 1983
Loaded on April 15, 1999
published in Prison Legal News
April, 1999, page 24
Parole Change May Violate Ex Post Facto; Change Can Be Challenged Via § 1983In two separate rulings the court of appeals for the District of Columbia circuit held that changes to parole eligibility schemes may violate the ex post facto clause and such changes can be challenged via 42 ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- The Mental Torture of American Prisoners: Cheaper Than Lab Rats, Part 2, by Hans Sherrer
- Medical Care Unconstitutional in Puerto Rico Prisons
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- PLN Sues Michigan DOC over Censorship of The Celling of America
- Michigan Department of Corrections Fined $300,000 in Contempt Case
- Former Jail Prisoner Awarded $8,000 for Abuse; PLRA Attorney Fee Limit Inapplicable to Juveniles
- Jailhouse Journalism: The Fourth Estate Behind Bars by James McGrath (Book Review), by Paul Wright
- Losing the Vote: The Impact of Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States (Book Review), by Alex Friedmann
- PLRA Exhaustion Requirement Not Retroactive
- PLRA Fee Provisions Apply to All Pending Cases in the Fifth Circuit
- Eighth Circuit Upholds, Defines IFP Provisions
- IFP Application Not Required When Suit Filed
- Physical Injury Requirement Not Retroactive
- No Leave to Amend Complaint for IFP Litigants
- PLRA Doesn't Ban Class Actions
- Trouble in Mind: ADX – The Fourth Year, by Ray Luc Levasseur
- Daring Death Row Escape Shakes up Texas
- Oregon "Predatory Sex Offender" Label Requires Notice and Hearing
- De Facto Ban on Live Testimony Unconstitutional
- South Carolina Parole Elimination Violates Ex Post Facto
- Illegal Detention Violates Substantive Due Process
- Jury Awards $8,000 in California Prison Assault
- New York Prisoners Have Right to Staff Assistance and Witness Testimony
- Seventh Circuit Defines Court Access Claims Involving Property
- Failure to Give Summary Judgement Notice is Reversible Error
- Indiana May Not Deny Pay and Educational Programs to Protective Custody Prisoners
- No Appeal Allowed in Louisiana Consent Decree Dissolution
- U.S. District Courts Have No Authority To Grant Or Deny Credit Toward Sentence
- Denial of Good Time Because of Jury Sentencing Choice Violates Equal Protection
- $45,000 Award in BOP Tort Claim Medical Neglect Suit
- Released Sex Offender Not "In Custody" for Habeas
- New York Jail Brutality Suit Settled for $3,500
- Timothy "Little Rock" Reed Released on Parole
- $1,500 in Disabled Prisoner Work Suit
- $355,000 Verdict in New York Asthma Death
- Mauro Vacated for Rehearing
- Parole Change May Violate Ex Post Facto; Change Can Be Challenged Via § 1983
- BOP Violent Offender Notification Policy Overinclusive
- Twenty-Four Hour Notice of Disciplinary Charges Required
- Seizure of Trust Account Interest Violates Takings Clause
- Denial of Handicapped Jail Facilities Set for Trial
- News in Brief
- Cane Seizure Can Violate Eighth Amendment
- $250,000 FTCA Beating Judgment Reversed
More from these topics:
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Habeas Relief in ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ Case, Feb. 1, 2025. junk science, Habeas Corpus, Forensic Sciences, Child Abuse/Abusers, Evidence - Admissibility.
- Fifth Circuit Leaves Louisiana Prisoner Waiting for Reinstated Parole, Jan. 15, 2025. Parole, Overdetention, Victim's Rights to Enforce Collection.
- California Prisoner Awarded Over $1.26 Million in Suit Challenging Withheld Legal Mail Which Resulted in Habeas Loss, Jan. 15, 2025. Settlements, Habeas Corpus, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail.
- Georgia Supreme Court Grants Habeas Relief Where Both Trial and Appellate Counsel Provided Ineffective Assistance by Failing to Challenge Indictment for Residential Burglary That Failed to Allege Defendant Illegally Entered a ‘Dwelling’, Jan. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Constitutional Challenges/Law.
- Ninth Circuit Holds District Courts Have No Authority Under Rule 4 of Rules Governing § 2254 Cases to Dismiss Habeas Petition on the Merits, Dec. 15, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Dismissal, Authority and Jurisdiction.
- Ninth Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to California Prisoner on Napue Claim Because Prosecution Failed to Correct Informant’s False Testimony That He Did Not Receive Any Benefit In Exchange for His Testimony, Dec. 1, 2024. Informants, Habeas Corpus, Informants and Paid Witnesses, False Testimony.
- Public Defender Files Habeas Petitions for Detainees at “Horrific” Baltimore Lockup, Nov. 15, 2024. Failure to Treat, Conditions of Confinement, Hygiene Supplies, Disclosure of Records, Habeas Corpus.
- Ninth Circuit Denies Habeas Relief to Prisoner Who Invoked Fifth Amendment Right to Counsel During Custodial Interrogation but Made Incriminating Statements to Undercover Informant Posing as Fellow Prisoner Because Right to Counsel Not Violated, Nov. 1, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Custodial Interrogations/Statements, Counsel - Right to.
- Arizona Supreme Court Allows Third PCR Motion Based on IAC for Erroneous Advice About Parole Eligibility Due to ‘Pervasive Confusion’ Regarding Parole Within Legal Community, Nov. 1, 2024. Parole, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.