×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Pro Se IFP Litigant Entitled to Amend Suit in Second Circuit
Loaded on Aug. 15, 1999
published in Prison Legal News
August, 1999, page 23
The court of appeals for the Second circuit held that district courts must grant leave to indigent pro se litigants to amend their complaints before the suit is dismissed. The suit in this case was filed by a non prisoner pro se litigant with in forma pauperis (IFP) status. The ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- "Victims' Rights" as a Stalkinghorse for State Repression, by Paul Wright
- No Equal Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System, by David Cole (Review), by Alex Friedmann
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- PLN Sues Alabama DOC Over Gift Subscription Ban
- Notes from the Unrepenitentiary, by Laura Whitehorn
- Prison-Industrial Complex Conferences Are Spreading the Word, by Hans Sherrer
- Kentucky Jail Settles Strip Search Suit for $11.5 Million
- Washington 35% Law Struck Down by State Court
- Washington Legislature Amends 35% Law, Again, by Paul Wright
- Washington DOC Illegally Penalizes Indigents
- Class Action Suits Challenge Rip-Off Prison and Jail Phone Rates
- FCC Requires Rate Disclosure for Prison Phones
- Kentucky Utilities Commission Reduces Prison and Jail Phone Rates
- Warden Used "Force" in Sexual Assault
- Private Prison Operators Enter Medical Care Market, by Alex Friedmann
- Jury Awards Beaten Texas Prisoner $250,000
- Physical Injury Rule Applied to Pre-PLRA Asbestos Exposure
- CCA Settles Youngstown Suit for $2.48 Million
- Attorney Fees Must Be Expressly Reserved
- PLN Sues Utah Jail over "Bulk Mail" Ban
- First Amendment Guarantees Kosher Meals
- Frivolous Qualified Immunity Appeals Warrant Sanctions
- Individual Capacity Claims Not Applicable to RA and ADA
- Franklin Reversed; DC Prisoners Have No Right to Qualified Interpreters
- No Qualified Immunity for Texas Sheriff and CCRI Guards Who Abused Missouri Prisoners
- No Liberty Interest in Illinois Parole Laws
- BOP Erred in Denying Early Release Eligibility
- Denial of Pain Medication Violates Eighth Amendment
- Motive Question Precludes Summary Judgment in Medical Suit
- Tarrant County Jail's Christian Education Unit May Violate Texas and Federal Establishment Clauses
- Iowa Ban on Tapes with Parental Warning Upheld, by Paul Wright
- AA Probation Requirement Continues to Violate Establishment Clause
- Pro Se IFP Litigant Entitled to Amend Suit in Second Circuit
- California Guard Union Doles Out Millions to Politicians
- PLRA Consent Decree Termination Provision Upheld by 2nd and 3rd Circuits
- Costs Imposed Regardless of Ability to Pay
- PLRA Attorney Fee Cap Applies in $65,000 Beating Case
- Heck Doesn't Apply After Release from Prison
- No Administrative Exhaustion Requirement for Ex-Prisoners
- PLRA Doesn't Require Notice of Claim for Exhaustion
- Contaminated Water Claim Not Barred by PLRA Physical Injury Rule
- BOP Warden Held in Contempt for Failure to Forward PLRA Filing Fee
- Seventh Circuit Clarifies Good Faith Appeal Standard, Again
- News in Brief
- Alabama Jail Injuction Dissolved
More from these topics:
- Regional Jail in Kentucky Settles DOJ Complaint, Agrees to Provide Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, Sept. 15, 2024. Complaints, Drug Treatment/Rehab, Drug Testing/Treatment Programs.
- Ninth Circuit Refunds Filing Fee to “Struck-Out” California Prisoner Denied Indigent Status Under PLRA, May 1, 2024. Filing Fees (PLRA), Recalling Mandate, Three Strike Litigants.
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Fourth Circuit: South Carolina Prisoner’s Bivens Claim Must Detail Unconstitutional Acts of Each Defendant, April 26, 2024. Complaints, Civil Rights Actions or Offenses/Bivens Actions, Dismissal.
- Finding Indiana Grievance Process “Unavailable,” Federal Judge Grants Summary Judgment to 22 Prisoners on Same Day, April 1, 2024. PLRA, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Seventh Circuit Reinstates Wisconsin Prisoner’s ADA Claim for Untreated Knee Injury, March 1, 2024. Failure to Treat, Bedding, Complaints, Americans with Disabilities Act, Sufficiency of Pleadings, Deliberate Indifference.
- Eleventh Circuit Says Florida Prisoner’s Dismissed Complaint Doesn’t Count as a “Strike”, Dec. 1, 2023. Complaints, Dismissal, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.
- Tenth Circuit: Colorado Prisoner’s Injury Requiring Medical Treatment Not De Minimus, July 15, 2023. Failure to Treat, PLRA.
- After Eleventh Circuit Says ICE Detainee Is Not “Prisoner” Subject to PLRA, He Goes Missing from Georgia, March 1, 2023. PLRA, Detainers.
- Eighth Circuit Says Judge Dismissing Claim of Federal Prisoner in Arkansas Was Premature in Counting It a PLRA ‘Strike’, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.