×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Employers Entitled to Discovery on Plaintiffs Mental State
A plaintiff who alleged mental distress in an employment case did not place
his mental condition "in controversy" entitling the defendants to a Rule 35
psychiatric examination. At 194: "No specific psychiatric malady has been
alleged nor has Bowen asserted a claim of unusually severe emotional
distress within the meaning ...
his mental condition "in controversy" entitling the defendants to a Rule 35
psychiatric examination. At 194: "No specific psychiatric malady has been
alleged nor has Bowen asserted a claim of unusually severe emotional
distress within the meaning ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login