×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Expert Testimony Fails to Prove Subjective Mental Intent of Psychiatrist
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that expert testimony does not
establish a psychiatrist's subjective mental intent in a prisoner's 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate
indifference to serious medical needs. This action was brought by a
prisoner at the Georgia Women's Correctional ...
establish a psychiatrist's subjective mental intent in a prisoner's 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate
indifference to serious medical needs. This action was brought by a
prisoner at the Georgia Women's Correctional ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login