×
You have 2 more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
No Right to Smoke
The court of appeals for the Eighth circuit held that Iowa prisoners have no constitutional right to smoke. No court has held otherwise. Given the rise in suits over exposure to second hand tobacco smoke more states are banning smoking. See: Grass v. Sargent, 903 F.2d 1207 (8th Cir. 1990).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Grass v. Sargent
| Year | 1990 |
|---|---|
| Cite | 903 F.2d 1207 (8th Cir. 1990) |
| Level | Court of Appeals |
| Attorney Fees | 0 |
| Damages | 0 |
Grass v. Sargent, 903 F.2d 1206 (8th Cir. 05/29/1990)
[1] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
[2] No. 89-2957
[3] 1990, 903 F.2d 1206
[4] filed: May 29, 1990.
[5] LARRY WAYNE GRASS, APPELLANT
v.
WILLIS SARGENT, WARDEN, CUMMINS UNIT; A. L. LOCKHART, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, APPELLEES
[6] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Honorable G. Thomas Eisele.
[7] COUNSEL
[8] Counsel who represented the Appellant was Larry Wayne Grass, Pro Se.
[9] Counsel who represented the Appellee was (no brief filed).
[10] McMillian, Fagg, and Bowman, Circuit Judges.
[11] Author: Per Curiam
[12] Larry Wayne Grass, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting a violation of his constitutional rights by the Arkansas Department of Correction's newly implemented policy prohibiting smoking in the prison visitation area during visiting hours.
[13] There is no constitutional right to smoke in prison. See Doughty v. Board of County Comm'rs, 731 F. Supp. 423, 426 (D.Colo. 1989). The state regulation Grass cites directs prison officials to establish a smoking policy, but does not contain particularized substantive criteria to guide the officials or mandatory language requiring them to act in a certain way and thus does not create a liberty interest. See Williams v. Armontrout, 852 F.2d 377, 379 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 996, 109 S. Ct. 564, 102 L. Ed. 2d 589 (1988). Grass's complaint must also fail as an eighth amendment claim because the policy does not deprive inmates of a "minimal civilized measure of life's necessities." Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347, 69 L. Ed. 2d 59, 101 S. Ct. 2392 (1981). We agree with the district court that the complaint has no basis in law and is nothing more than a claim of infringement of a legal interest that does not exist. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 109 S. Ct. 1827, 1831, 1833, 104 L. Ed. 2d 338 (1989).
[14] Accordingly, we affirm.
[1] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
[2] No. 89-2957
[3] 1990, 903 F.2d 1206
[4] filed: May 29, 1990.
[5] LARRY WAYNE GRASS, APPELLANT
v.
WILLIS SARGENT, WARDEN, CUMMINS UNIT; A. L. LOCKHART, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, APPELLEES
[6] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Honorable G. Thomas Eisele.
[7] COUNSEL
[8] Counsel who represented the Appellant was Larry Wayne Grass, Pro Se.
[9] Counsel who represented the Appellee was (no brief filed).
[10] McMillian, Fagg, and Bowman, Circuit Judges.
[11] Author: Per Curiam
[12] Larry Wayne Grass, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting a violation of his constitutional rights by the Arkansas Department of Correction's newly implemented policy prohibiting smoking in the prison visitation area during visiting hours.
[13] There is no constitutional right to smoke in prison. See Doughty v. Board of County Comm'rs, 731 F. Supp. 423, 426 (D.Colo. 1989). The state regulation Grass cites directs prison officials to establish a smoking policy, but does not contain particularized substantive criteria to guide the officials or mandatory language requiring them to act in a certain way and thus does not create a liberty interest. See Williams v. Armontrout, 852 F.2d 377, 379 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 996, 109 S. Ct. 564, 102 L. Ed. 2d 589 (1988). Grass's complaint must also fail as an eighth amendment claim because the policy does not deprive inmates of a "minimal civilized measure of life's necessities." Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347, 69 L. Ed. 2d 59, 101 S. Ct. 2392 (1981). We agree with the district court that the complaint has no basis in law and is nothing more than a claim of infringement of a legal interest that does not exist. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 109 S. Ct. 1827, 1831, 1833, 104 L. Ed. 2d 338 (1989).
[14] Accordingly, we affirm.