×
You have no more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
Disciplinary Rule Description Rather than Title Controls
Snider was taken to see a nurse at St. Mary’s Correctional Institution. During the visit, he asked the nurse why he experienced bleeding in his scrotum. Snider told the nurse he believed it occurred as a result of “choking his tube” in the shower. He then asked the nurse to have sex with him and “ran his hand over [her] breast.”
Snider was charged and convicted of a DR for rape. He challenged his DR conviction because no penetration had occurred. The Court held the rule prohibited a prisoner from attempting to physically force another person to submit to any sexual act, and Snider’s actions qualified under the rule. The trial court’s denial of habeas relief was affirmed. See: Snider v. Fox, 218 W.Va. 663, 627 S.E.2d 353 (W.Va. 2006).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Snider v. Fox
Year | 2006 |
---|---|
Cite | 218 W.Va. 663, 627 S.E.2d 353 (W.Va. 2006) |
Level | State Supreme Court |
Injunction Status | N/A |