×
You have 2 more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
Attorney Admonished for Improper Advertising
By Brandon Sample
On December 26, 2006, the Florida Bar admonished an attorney for sending improper advertisements to prisoners.
David Milo Lamos, a Florida attorney, sent a direct mail advertisement to prisoners. The advertisement contained statements creating “unjustified expectations,” was not marked “advertisement” in red, and included a contract/order form that was not marked “Sample, Do Not Sign” as required.
Finding that Lamos’ conduct violated Florida Bar rules, Lamos was admonished and directed to obtain “pre-publication review and approval of all future advertisements for one year.” See: The Florida Bar v. Lamos, File No. 2006-90, 166 (025).
On December 26, 2006, the Florida Bar admonished an attorney for sending improper advertisements to prisoners.
David Milo Lamos, a Florida attorney, sent a direct mail advertisement to prisoners. The advertisement contained statements creating “unjustified expectations,” was not marked “advertisement” in red, and included a contract/order form that was not marked “Sample, Do Not Sign” as required.
Finding that Lamos’ conduct violated Florida Bar rules, Lamos was admonished and directed to obtain “pre-publication review and approval of all future advertisements for one year.” See: The Florida Bar v. Lamos, File No. 2006-90, 166 (025).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
The Florida Bar v. Lamos
| Year | 2006 |
|---|---|
| Cite | File No. 2006-90, 166 (025) |
| Level | Administrative Agency |
| Injunction Status | N/A |