Bjs Report Sexual Violence in Prisons 2006
Download original document:
![Brief thumbnail](/media/cache/1e/22/1e22a466c4af853cd9eaaabdf2d4e2a6.jpg)
Document text
![Brief thumbnail](/media/cache/1e/22/1e22a466c4af853cd9eaaabdf2d4e2a6.jpg)
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 August 2007, NCJ 218914 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 By Allen J. Beck, Ph.D. Paige M. Harrison, BJS Statisticians and Devon B. Adams, Policy Analyst The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-79) requires the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) to develop new national data collections on the incidence and prevalence of sexual violence within correctional facilities. This report fulfills the requirement under Sec. 4 (c)(1) of the Act for submission of an annual report on the activities of BJS with respect to prison rape. Between January 1 and June 30, 2007, BJS completed the third annual national survey of administrative records in adult correctional facilities, covering calendar year 2006. Although the results were limited to incidents reported to correctional officials, the survey provides an understanding of what officials know, based on the number of reported allegations, and the outcomes of follow-up investigations.1 By comparing results of the 2006 survey with those from 2004 and 2005, BJS is able to assess trends in sexual violence for the first time since the Act was passed. Administrative records surveys are one part of BJS’s multimeasure, multi-mode implementation strategy. During 2006, BJS completed development and testing of survey methodologies that rely on reports of victimization provided directly by prison and jail inmates, former inmates, and youth held in juvenile facilities. These methodologies rely on self-administered surveys that offer anonymity to victims of sexual violence to report their experiences. Using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview procedures, respondents interact with a computer-administered questionnaire using a touch-screen and follow audio instructions delivered via headphones. (See box on page 2 for a status report and national implementation schedule.) 1 A survey of State-operated juvenile systems and privately or locally operated juvenile facilities was also conducted for 2006. Results from the 2005 and 2006 juvenile surveys will be published in a separate report. The 2006 administrative records survey provides the basis for the annual statistical review required under the Act. The survey included all Federal and State prison systems and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The survey also included representative samples of jail jurisdictions, privately operated adult prisons and jails, and jails in Indian country. Altogether, the administrative survey included facilities housing more than 1.8 million inmates, or 81% of all inmates held in adult facilities in 2006. (See Methodology for detailed sampling description.) As with previous administrative records surveys, the 2006 survey results should not be used to rank systems or facilities. Given the absence of uniform reporting, caution is necessary for accurate interpretation of the survey results. Higher or lower counts among facilities may reflect variations in definitions, reporting capacities, and procedures for recording allegations as opposed to differences in the underlying incidence of sexual violence. In 2004 BJS developed uniform definitions of sexual violence. Incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence were classified as either nonconsensual sexual acts (the most serious violent forms of sexual assault) or abusive sexual contacts (less serious, but unwanted). Incidents involving staff were separated into staff sexual misconduct (any act of a sexual nature directed toward an inmate) or staff sexual harassment (repeated verbal statements of a sexual nature to an inmate). For this report, all such incidents are considered sexual violence. (See Methodology for detailed definitions.) Detailed tabulations of the survey results by system and sampled facility are presented in Appendix tables 1a – 4b, available on the BJS web site at <http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ bjs/pub/pdf/svrca06.pdf>. Allegations of sexual violence rose during 2006 Reports of sexual violence varied across systems and sampled facilities, with every State prison system except Alaska and New Mexico reporting at least one allegation of sexual violence. Among the 344 sampled local jail jurisdictions participating in the survey, 161 (47%) reported an allegation. About 52% of the 46 sampled privately operated prisons and jails reported at least one allegation. The 2006 survey recorded 5,605 allegations of sexual violence. Taking into account weights for sampled facilities, the estimated total number of allegations for the Nation was 6,528. Since the Prison Rape Elimination Act was passed in 2003, the estimated number of allegations nationwide has risen by 21% (5,386 in 2004; 6,241 in 2005). Some of the increase may have resulted from adoption of BJS definitions and improved reporting by correctional authorities. Collection of victim self-report of sexual violence in prisons and jails underway BJS is working toward full implementation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act. As of June 30, 2007, BJS and its data collection agents had completed all phases of development and testing. BJS has entered into cooperative agreements to collect reports of sexual violence directly from inmates in prisons and jails, former State prison inmates, and youth in State juvenile facilities. BJS has worked extensively with 1. Research Triangle International (RTI) (Raleigh, NC) to collect data from inmates in prisons and jails; 2. Westat, Inc. (Rockville, MD) to collect data from adjuducated youth in State and local juvenile facilities; 3. National Opinion Research Center (NORC) (Chicago, IL) to collect data from State inmates under active parole supervision. Though underlying survey methodology and logistical procedures differ with each of these data collections, the measurement strategies are consistent. The surveys consist of an Audio Computer-Assisted SelfInterview (ACASI) in which respondents interact with a computer-administered questionnaire using a touchscreen and follow audio instructions delivered via headphones. The use of ACASI is expected to overcome many limitations of previous research. The following work has been completed or is underway: Prison and jail inmates • Implementation of the National Inmate Survey (NIS) began in April 2007 in 148 prisons and 302 jails. Data collection will continue through December 2007, with about 90,000 completed interviews anticipated. • On August 30, 2007, BJS will consult with corrections administrators and experts in statistical scaling to discuss various measures of sexual violence by which to rank facilities. 2 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 • Rankings of prison facilities, as required under the Act, are expected in November 2007; jail rankings are expected shortly after the completion of the data collection. Youth in custody • Testing of the National Survey of Youth in Custody (NSYC) was completed in June 2007. The test involved 12 juvenile facilities in 6 States with more than 750 completed interviews. • Results of the testing and plans for implementation will be presented to juvenile administrators, researchers, and other stakeholders at a national workshop on August 28, 2007. • National implementation is expected in early 2008, pending approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). When fully implemented, the NSYC will include about 15,000 adjudicated youth in a sample of 208 Stateoperated facilities and 48 large non-State facilities (that had an average daily population of 90 or more youth during 2005). Former State prisoners • The Former Prisoner Survey (FPS) was tested in 16 parole offices with 788 former inmates on active parole supervision. In May 2007, the collection was submitted to OMB for review. • The survey will provide a national estimate of the incidence and prevalence of sexual vicitimization based on reports of former State prison inmates. Data will be collected on the totality of the prior term of incarceration, including any time in a police lockup, local jail, State prison, or community correctional facility prior to final discharge. • National implementation will begin in late 2007, pending OMB approval. When fully implemented the survey will include about 16,500 former inmates in a sample of 285 parole offices. Expressed as rates, there were 2.91 allegations of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates held in prison, jail, and other adult correctional facilities in 2006, up from 2.46 per 1,000 inmates in 2004. Overall, the rate in State prisons (3.75 per 1,000) was higher than the rate in local jails (2.05 per 1,000) (table 1). About 36% of the reported allegations of sexual violence in 2006 involved staff sexual misconduct; 34%, inmate-oninmate nonconsensual sexual acts; 17%, staff sexual harassment; and 13%, inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts. These percentages were nearly unchanged from those reported in 2005. Correctional authorities reported Table 1. Allegations of sexual violence and rates per 1,000 inmates, by type of facility, 2005 and 2006 Facility type Total Prisons Public-Federala Public-State Private Local jails Public Private Other adult facilities Indian country jailsb Military-operated ICE-operated National estimate 2006 2005 Rate per 1,000 inmates 2006 2005 6,528 6,241 2.91 2.83 242 4,516 200 268 4,341 182 1.50 3.75 1.91 1.71 3.68 1.80 1,521 12 1,384 22 2.05 0.72 1.86 1.33 29 3 5 32 8 4 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^Too few cases to provide a reliable rate. aFederal numbers for 2006 are not comparable to those in 2005 due to a change in reporting. bExcludes facilities housing juveniles only. 3,489 allegations of staff sexual misconduct and harassment during 2006, compared to 3,470 during 2005.2 Allegations of sexual violence, by type of incident, 2005 and 2006 National estimate Percent Incident type 2006 2005 2006 2005 Total Inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Staff sexual misconduct Staff sexual harassment 6,528 6,241 100% 100% 2,205 2,160 34 35 834 2,371 1,118 611 2,386 1,084 13 36 17 10 38 17 Upon investigation, most allegations were unsubstantiated or unfounded The most common outcome of investigations was a determination that the evidence was insufficient to show whether the alleged incident occurred. In 2006 more than half of all allegations (55%) were unsubstantiated; more than a quarter (29%) were unfounded (determined not to have occurred). About a sixth of all allegations (17%) were substantiated. Previous surveys recorded similar outcomes. Based on completed investigations, allegations of staff sexual harassment and inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts were less likely to have been substantiated than other types of allegations (table 2). During 2006, 7% of allegations of staff sexual harassment and 14% of inmate-oninmate nonconsensual sexual acts were substantiated, compared to 19% of the allegations of inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts and 25% of the allegations of staff sexual misconduct. 2See Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2005 at <http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/svrca05.htm>. Table 2. Outcomes of investigations into allegations of sexual violence, by type of facility, 2006 All facilitiesa Number Inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Staff sexual misconduct Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Staff sexual harassment Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing 2,205 262 1,030 616 297 834 158 491 165 20 2,371 471 877 535 489 1,118 70 595 292 161 Percentb 100% 14 54 32 100% 19 60 21 100% 25 47 28 100% 7 62 31 State and Federal prisons Number Percentb 1,390 147 707 304 232 707 125 426 139 17 1,677 235 745 309 388 984 47 537 258 142 100% 13 61 26 100% 18 62 20 100% 18 58 24 100% 6 64 31 Local jails Number 725 111 295 259 60 116 31 54 28 2 575 229 91 166 90 105 15 50 34 6 Percentb Private prisons and jails Number 100% 17 44 39 100% 27 48 25 100% 47 19 34 100% 15 51 34 87 3 28 52 4 11 0 9 0 1 95 15 36 37 9 19 0 7 0 12 Percentb 100% 4 34 63 100% 0 100 0 100% 17 41 42 100% 0 100 0 Note: Detail may not sum to total due to rounding. aIncludes b jails in Indian country and facilities operated by the U.S. military and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Percents based on allegations for which investigations have been completed. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 3 Overall, 967 incidents of sexual violence were substantiated in 2006, compared to 885 in 2005 (table 3). Relative to the number of inmates, the rate of substantiated incidents of sexual violence in 2006 was 4.3 per 10,000 inmates, nearly unchanged from the 4.0 per 10,000 inmates recorded in 2005. Rates were lowest in Federal prisons and privately operated prisons (fewer than 1 in 10,000). Rates of substantiated incidents in State prisons, local jail jurisdictions, and privately operated jails were 4 to 5 times higher. Substantiated incidents were too few to provide reliable estimates for other types of facilities. Surveys reveal consistent patterns of sexual violence in correctional facilities In 2005 and 2006, correctional authorities were asked to provide detailed information on all substantiated incidents of sexual violence on a separate incident form. Authorities reported information on the circumstances of each incident, characteristics of victims and perpetrators, type of pressure or physical force, sanctions imposed, and victim assistance. The two surveys provide a profile of victims and perpetrators and reveal consistent patterns among the substantiated incidents. Data provided on incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence revealed that — • More than one inmate was reported to have been victimized in 8% of the incidents in 2006 and 4% of those in 2005 (table 4). • More than one perpetrator was involved in 10% of the incidents in 2006 and 7% of those in 2005. • Males constituted 82% of the victims and 85% of the perpetrators in 2006, compared to 88% of the victims and 91% of the perpetrators in 2005. • In both years, victims were on average younger than perpetrators. In 2006, 44% of victims were age 24 or younger, while 81% of perpetrators were age 25 or older. Table 3. Substantiated incidents of sexual violence and rates per 1,000 inmates, by type of facility, 2005 and 2006 Facility type Total Prisons Public-Federal Public-State Private Local jails Public Private Other adult facilities Indian country jails* Military-operated ICE-operated National estimate 2006 2005 Rate per 1,000 inmates 2006 2005 967 885 0.43 0.40 5 549 9 41 458 24 0.03 0.46 0.09 0.26 0.39 0.24 385 8 336 13 0.52 0.48 0.45 0.78 7 2 2 10 2 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^Too few cases to provide a reliable rate. *Excludes facilities housing juveniles only. 4 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 • In 2006 whites made up 72% of the victims; blacks, 16%; and Hispanics, 9%. Among perpetrators, 39% were white; 49% black; and 10% Hispanics. Similar distributions were observed in 2005. • In both years at least half of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence was interracial: 6% of incidents in 2006 involved a white perpetrator and a non-white victim; 35%, a black perpetrator and a non-black victim; and 8%, a Hispanic perpetrator and a non-Hispanic victim (not shown in table). Number of victims and perpetrators by race/ Hispanic origin Perpetrator Victim White* Black* Hispanic Other* Total 200 227 52 8 White* 171 146 32 7 Black* 9 58 7 0 Hispanic 14 19 11 0 Other* 6 4 2 1 *Excludes persons of Hispanic origin. Table 4. Characteristics of victims and perpetrators in substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, 2005 and 2006 2006 Victim characteristics Number of victims 1 2 or more Gender Male Female Age Under 25 25-39 40 or older Race/Hispanic origin Whitea Blacka Hispanic Othera,b Perpetrator characteristics Number of perpetrators 1 2 or more Gender Male Female Age Under 25 25-39 40 or older Race/Hispanic origin Whitea Blacka Hispanic Othera,b a b 2005 92% 8 96% 4 82% 18 88% 12 44% 40 15 53% 39 8 72% 16 9 3 73% 12 9 6 90% 10 93% 7 85% 15 91% 9 20% 53 28 26% 44 30 39% 49 10 2 43% 39 15 3 Excludes victims and perpetrators of Hispanic origin. Includes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. Most incidents of sexual violence among inmates involve force or threat of force and occur in the victim’s cell, in the evening injured rose, from 15% in 2005 to 20% in 2006. Anal or rectal tearing was reported at nearly the same levels (5% in 2006 and 6% in 2005). Correctional authorities reported that physical force or threat of force was used in more than half of all substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence (table 5). In 21% of the incidents in 2006, no force was used or threatened. In 30% of incidents, victims were talked into it. In 7% of incidents, victims were offered protection, bribed, or blackmailed. Incidents of sexual violence among inmates occurred most often in a victim’s cell or dormitory (totaling more than 70% in both years). By contrast, 17% of the incidents in 2006 and 21% of the incidents in 2005 occurred in a common area, such as a shower or dayroom. In 6% of the incidents in 2006 and 9% in 2005, the location was a program service area, such as a storage room, hallway, laundry, cafeteria, kitchen, or workshop. Force or the threat of force was more common among incidents of nonconsensual sexual acts (67%) than among incidents of abusive sexual contact (44%). The victim was held down or restrained in 38% of the incidents of nonconsensual sexual acts during 2006. In 18% of these incidents, the victim was physically harmed or injured. Although abusive sexual contacts are typically less serious forms of assault, the victim was held down or restrained in 28% of the incidents, and the victim was physically harmed or injured in 10% of the incidents (not shown in table). Overall, the use or threat of force was more prevalent among incidents reported in 2006 (58%) than in 2005 (51%). In addition, the proportion of victims who were Sexual violence among inmates was more common in the evening (between 6 p.m. and midnight) than at any other time of the day, exceeding 40% of all incidents in both surveys. In 2005 it was least common between midnight and 6 a.m. (18%); in 2006 it was least common between 6 a.m. and noon (20%). Incidents of sexual violence among inmates, when reported, are typically reported by a victim or another inmate and not by a correctional officer or other staff. In 2006, 83% of the substantiated incidents of inmate sexual violence were reported by the victim or another inmate; in 2005, 91%. Table 5. Circumstances surrounding substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, by type, 2005 and 2006 Number of incidents All types 2006 2005 Nonconsensual sexual acts 2006 2005 Abusive sexual contacts 2006 2005 Type of pressure or force None Force/threat of force Persuasion or talked into it Other 21% 58 30 7 30% 51 18 17 14% 67 32 8 18% 59 22 22 31% 44 28 4 57% 33 10 8 Victim injured No Yes 80% 20 85% 15 74% 26 78% 22 87% 13 97% 3 Where occurred In victim's cell/room In a dormitory In a common area Other areas 64% 9 17 13 59% 12 21 14 76% 6 11 10 59% 11 23 10 46% 14 26 17 59% 15 16 24 Time of dayb 6 a.m. to noon Noon to 6 p.m. 6 p.m. to midnight Midnight to 6 a.m. 20% 26 45 26 28% 20 44 18 17% 18 47 32 22% 18 50 18 24% 37 41 17 41% 25 31 18 Who reported the incident Victim Another inmate Correctional officer Other 70% 13 17 4 83% 8 11 6 72% 16 12 2 84% 8 11 6 65% 9 24 7 79% 10 10 4 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 5 Most victims experienced a change in their housing; most inmate perpetrators received solitary confinement The sexual relationship “appeared to be willing” in 57% of incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment The most common response to a reported incident of sexual violence among inmates was to place the victim in administrative segregation or protective custody and to move the perpetrator to solitary confinement or other higher level of custody. Among victims of inmate sexual violence reported in the 2006 survey, 40% were placed in administrative segregation or protective custody; 13% were placed in a medical unit; and 16% were transferred to another facility (not shown in table). Nearly a quarter (24%) experienced no change in their housing or custody level. Among victims in the 2005 survey, nearly the same actions had been taken; a slightly higher percent (32%) had experienced no change in housing. Correctional authorities also reported detailed data on 544 substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment (up from 344 in 2005). To address concerns about the reporting and interpretation of data in the 2005 survey, BJS changed the item related to the nature of the incidents in 2006. The option “Romantic” was replaced by “Sexual relationship between inmate and staff appeared to be willing.” The options “Other” and “Level of coercion unknown” were added. In addition, the options were reordered from most to least coercive. (See Methodology for further details.) Inmate perpetrators were moved to solitary confinement in 78% of the incidents of sexual violence in 2006, compared to 71% in 2005 (table 6). Perpetrators of the most serious incidents, nonconsensual sexual acts, were the most likely to receive solitary confinement (81% in 2006, 72% in 2005). Legal sanctions, including arrest, referral for prosecution, or a new sentence, were imposed on perpetrators in 41% of the incidents in 2006 and 51% of the incidents in 2005. This drop was attributed to a decline in legal sanctions imposed on perpetrators of abusive sexual contacts (39% in 2005; 18% in 2006). In addition, perpetrators in 2006 received a combination of other sanctions, including confinement to their cell or room (16%), loss of privileges (20%), placement in a higher custody level (22%), and transfer to another facility (22%). These types of sanctions were imposed in 2005 at similar rates, except for confinement to their cell or room (28%). Table 6. Sanctions imposed on perpetrators in substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, by type of incident, 2005 and 2006 Nonconsensual Abusive sexual All incidents sexual acts contacts 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 Solitary/disciplinary Legal action Arrested Referred for prosecution Confined to own cell/ room Placed in higher custody Loss of privileges Transferred to another facility 78% 41 16 71% 51 12 81% 56 21 72% 58 16 75% 18 6 70% 39 4 33 46 46 51 13 35 16 28 18 25 12 33 22 20 20 21 24 23 27 22 20 16 5 19 22 19 24 18 17 21 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple sanctions may have been imposed. Though these changes were introduced in 2006, the findings remained similar to those reported in 2005. • The sexual relationship “appeared to be willing” in 57% of incidents in 2006 (table 7). In comparison, the relationship was classified as “romantic” in 68% of the incidents in 2005. • Physical force, abuse of power, or pressure was involved in 7% of the incidents in 2006, compared to 15% of the incidents in 2005. • A third of the incidents in 2006 involved other forms of assault, including sexual harassment (15%), indecent exposure/invasion of privacy (9%), and unwanted touching for sexual gratification (5%). • In 12% of the incidents in 2006, correctional authorities reported the “level of coercion unknown.” Table 7. Characteristics of substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2006 Characteristic Number of incidents Nature of the incidentb Relationship appeared to be willing Sexual harassment Unwanted touching Indecent exposure Pressure/abuse of power Physical force Other/unknown Number of staff involvedc 1 2 Number of victimsc 1 2 3 4 or more 544 282 Jail 239 57% 15 5 9 5 2 12 62% 16 9 2 7 2 9 51% 15 2 18 2 0 16 98% 2 98% 2 98% 2 83% 14 2 2 89% 5 2 3 74% 25 0 0 a Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. b Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. c 6 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 All facilitiesa Prison Detail may not sum to 100% due to rounding. Other data reported on substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment during 2006 revealed that — • In more than half of the incidents, the victim (29%) or another inmate (27%) reported the misconduct (table 8). • Most incidents occurred outside the inmate’s living area: 46% in a program area, 8% in a common area, and 8% outside of the facility. • Incidents occurred most often between noon and 6 p.m. in prisons (53%) and between 6 p.m. and midnight in local jails (74%). • More than one staff member was involved in the sexual misconduct in 2% of the incidents. • Staff had victimized more than one inmate in 18% of the incidents. Table 8. Circumstances of substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2006 All facilitiesa Circumstance Prison Jail b Who reported the incident Victim Another inmate Family of victim Correctional officer Administrative staff Medical/healthcare staff Instructor/teacher/counselor Other (anonymous/letter) 29% 27 8 25 8 1 1 3 29% 23 2 27 11 2 1 5 29% 29 16 21 4 0 1 1 Where occurred In victim's cell/room In a dormitory In a common area In temporary holding area In a program service area Outside the facility In transit Staff office/infirmary Other/unknown 10% 14 8 8 46 8 <1 5 7 9% 10 10 0 49 12 <1 9 9 13% 20 4 18 41 3 <1 1 6 Time of day 6 a.m. to noon Noon to 6 p.m. 6 p.m. to midnight Midnight to 6 a.m. 35% 32 56 14 38% 53 38 16 36% 11 74 12 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. a Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. b The category "Chaplain/other religious official" was not marked in any incident. Female staff more frequently implicated in sexual misconduct in prisons; male staff in local jails In the 2006 survey, characteristics of victims and perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct and harassment differed by type of facility: • In State and Federal prisons, 65% of inmate victims of staff sexual misconduct and harassment were male, while 58% of staff perpetrators were female (tables 9 and 10). • In local jails, 80% of victims were female, while 79% of perpetrators were male. • 49% of staff perpetrators in prisons were age 40 or older, while 65% of victims were under age 35. • 56% of staff perpetrators in jails were age 40 or older, while 86% of victims were under age 35. • Among staff perpetrators in prisons and jails, 71% were white; 20%, black; and 7%, Hispanic. Among inmate victims, 66% were white; 23%, black; and 8%, Hispanic. • A correctional officer was identified as the perpetrator in 54% of incidents in prisons, and in 98% of incidents in jails (table 11). • A contract employee was involved in 17% of the incidents in prisons and in 2% of those in jails. Table 9. Characteristics of inmates involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2006 Characteristic All facilitiesa Prison Jail 44% 56 65% 35 20% 80 0% 18 33 25 13 8 3 0% 16 29 20 21 9 5 0% 21 38 27 6 7 1 66% 23 8 3 54% 32 12 2 80% 14 5 1 b Gender Male Female Ageb Under 18 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45 or older Race/Hispanic origin Whitec Blackc Hispanic Otherc,d aIncludes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. b The number of victims of staff misconduct totaled 671: gender was reported for 636; age for 631; and race/Hispanic origin for 628. c Excludes inmates of Hispanic origin. d Includes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 7 Table 10. Characteristics of staff involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2006 All facilitiesa Table 11. Type and position of staff involved in staff sexual misconduct and harassment, by type of facility, 2006 Prison Jail 60% 40 42% 58 79% 21 Age 24 or younger 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54 55 or older 8% 10 13 17 24 19 9 9% 14 12 17 16 24 9 4% 6 14 19 34 15 7 Race/Hispanic originb Whitec Blackc Hispanic Otherc,d 71% 20 7 2 70% 24 5 <1 74% 16 9 1 Genderb Male Female b aIncludes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. bGender was reported for 558 staff; age for 532; and race/Hispanic origin for 530. c Excludes staff of Hispanic origin. d Includes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. Three-quarters of staff perpetrators in 2006 lost their jobs; 56% were arrested or referred for prosecution Correctional authorities indicated that staff had been discharged or resigned in 77% of substantiated incidents in 2006, compared to 82% in 2005 (table 12). Staff had also been arrested or referred for prosecution in 56% of incidents (compared to 45% of incidents in 2005). Approximately 10% of staff perpetrators in 2006 were disciplined, transferred or demoted, compared to 17% in 2005. Among the multiple types of sanctions imposed on staff perpetrators during 2006, discharge or resignation was the most common, constituting 79% of incidents in prisons and 74% of those in jails. Jail staff were more likely than prison staff to be arrested or prosecuted (73% versus 43%). Sanctions imposed on staff in substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, 2005 and 2006 2006 2005 Legal sanction Arrest Referred for prosecution Loss of job Other sanction 56% 24 45 77 10 45% 28 34 82 17 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple response were allowed. 8 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Type of staff involved Full/part-time employee Contract employee/vendor Volunteer/intern Position of staff involved Administrator Correctional officer Clerical Maintenance Medical/health care Educational Other program staff Other All facilities* Prison Jail 89% 80% 99% 10 1 17 1 0% 75 1 10 8 3 2 1 0% 54 2 17 14 6 5 2 2 0 0% 98 0 1 1 0 0 0 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because more than one type of staff have been involved. *Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. Half of inmates involved in staff sexual misconduct were transferred or placed in segregation Correctional authorities indicated that the victims of staff sexual misconduct or harassment during 2006 were often transferred to another facility (31%) or placed in administrative segregation or protective custody (25%). Inmate victims had been transferred to another facility in 48% of the incidents in local jails and in 19% of the incidents in State and Federal prisons. Victims were less likely to have been moved to administrative segregation or protective custody when the incident occurred in a jail (19%) than in a prison (28%). In most incidents of staff sexual misconduct or harassment (76%), victims received no medical followup, counseling or mental health treatment. Victims were given a medical examination in 6% of the incidents in prisons and jails. They were provided counseling or mental health treatment in 12% of the incidents. Table 12. Impact on inmate and staff in substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct and harassment, 2006 All facilitiesa Medical followup for inmate Given medical examination Administered rape kit Tested for HIV/AIDS Tested for other STDs Provided counseling or mental health treatment None of the above Any change in housing/custody for inmate Placed in administratve segregation or protective custody Placed in medical unit Confined to own cell/room Given a higher custody level within facility Transferred to another facility Otherb None of the above Sanctions on staff Legal sanction Arrested Referred for prosecution Loss of job Discharged Staff resigned (prior to investigation) Staff resigned (after investigation) Other sanction Reprimanded/disciplined Demoted/diminished responsibilities Transferred to another facility 6% 10 2 2 Prison 8% 1 3 3 Jail 5% 18 2 2 12 76 17 79 8 74 25% 1 3 28% 1 4 19% 0 2 5 31 3 46 5 19 5 50 6 48 1 42 56% 24 45 77 44 43% 14 39 79 33 73% 34 57 74 57 26 37 13 7 10 10 10 12 11 5 9 8 1 <1 2 1 1 <1 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. aIncludes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. bIncludes "stayed in same unit," "transferred elsewhere in facility," and "incident reported after release." Methodology Measures of sexual violence In 2004 BJS developed uniform definitions of sexual violence. All incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence involve sexual contacts with any person without his or her consent, or with a person who is unable to consent or refuse. The most serious incidents, nonconsensual sexual acts, include: • Contact between the penis and the vagina or the penis and the anus including penetration, however slight; or • Contact between the mouth and the penis, vagina, or anus; or • Penetration of the anal or genital opening of another person by a hand, finger, or other object. The less serious incidents, abusive sexual contacts, include: • Intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person. • Incidents in which the intention is to sexually exploit (rather than to only harm or debilitate). Incidents of staff-with-inmate sexual violence are separated into two categories. Staff sexual misconduct includes any behavior or act of a sexual nature, either consensual or nonconsensual, directed toward an inmate by an employee, volunteer, official visitor, or agency representative. Such acts include: • Intentional touching of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks with the intent to abuse, arouse, or gratify sexual desire; or • Completed, attempted, threatened, or requested sexual acts; or • Occurrences of indecent exposure, invasion of privacy, or staff voyeurism for sexual gratification. Staff sexual harassment involves repeated verbal statements or comments of a sexual nature to an inmate by an employee, volunteer, official visitor, or agency representative. Such statements include demeaning references to gender or derogatory comments about body or clothing; or profane or obscene language or gestures. Since BJS first developed these definitions, correctional authorities have significantly enhanced their abilities to report uniform data on sexual violence. Authorities in 42 State and Federal prison systems were able to report incidents of abusive sexual contacts separately, as defined in the 2006 survey. Only two States limited reports to substantiated incidents. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 9 Most prison systems (44) were able to report data on staff sexual misconduct using survey definitions. Five systems were unable to separate sexual harassment from misconduct. One system did not record staff sexual harassment in a central database. Jail authorities were less likely than prison authorities to meet survey definitions. More than a third of the jail jurisdictions were unable to separate abusive sexual contacts from the more serious nonconsensual sexual acts; a quarter were unable to report staff sexual harassment separately from staff sexual misconduct. Sampling procedures The 2006 Survey of Sexual Violence was based on seven separate samples, corresponding to the different facilities covered under the Act. The following samples were drawn: 1. The survey included all 50 State adult prison systems and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Prison administrators were directed to report only on incidents of sexual violence that occurred within publicly operated adult facilities. 2. A sample of 41 privately operated prison facilities was drawn to produce a 10% sample of the 408 private prisons identified in the 2005 Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities. Facilities were ranked by average daily population (ADP) in the 12-month period ending June 30, 2005. Four facilities with an ADP of more than 2,005 inmates were selected with certainty due to their size. The remaining facilities were sorted by region and ADP within region and then sampled systematically with a probability proportional to their size. 3. A sample of 350 publicly operated jail facilities was selected based on data reported in the 2005 Census of Jail Inmates. Jail jurisdictions were sorted into five strata based on ADP during the 12-month period ending June 30, 2005, and sampled systematically to produce a representative national sample. In 2006 the second-largest jail jurisdiction in each State was selected from stratum 1 to avoid selecting with certainty the same jurisdiction as in 2005. (In previous surveys the 46 largest jails in each State were selected.) An additional 61 jail jurisdictions (forming stratum 2) were selected with certainty due to size (an ADP of 1,500 inmates or more). The remaining 2,813 jail jurisdictions in the 2005 census were then grouped into 3 strata: stratum 3 contained 1,599 jails with an ADP of 85 inmates or fewer; stratum 4 included 785 jails with an ADP of 86 to 283 inmates; and stratum 5 included 429 jails with an ADP of 284 to 1,499 inmates. Jail jurisdictions in these 3 strata were selected systematically with probabilities proportionate to their size, resulting in 46 selections from stratum 3, 52 from stratum 4, and 145 from stratum 5. 10 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Of the 350 selected jail jurisdictions, 5 did not respond to the survey: Rockdale County, GA Beaver County, PA Lycoming County, PA Greenville County, SC Ellis County, TX One of the facilities closed in 2006: Crossville City, AL 4. A sample of 5 privately operated jails was also selected based on data reported in the 2005 Census of Jail Inmates. The 42 private facilities were sorted by region, State, and ADP. Facilities were systematically sampled with probabilities proportionate to size. 5. Three additional samples of other correctional facilities were drawn to represent: a) jails in Indian Country (10 facilities holding adult and juvenile inmates were selected from a total of 68 based on the ADP during 2004); b) military-operated facilities (all 59 facilities operated by the Armed Services in the continental U.S.); c) 14 facilities operated by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Of the facilities selected, one had closed (Navajo Department of Corrections – Chinle, AZ). Data for each correctional system and sampled facility are displayed in Appendix tables 1a – 4b. In each table a measure of population size has been provided as a basis for comparison. National estimates and accuracy Survey responses were weighted to produce national estimates by type of correctional facility. Data from the Federal Bureau of Prisons, all State systems, military facilities, and ICE facilities received a weight of 1.00, since these systems and facilities were all selected (sampled with certainty). Among publicly operated jails, private prisons, private jails and jails in Indian country, facilities were assigned a weight equal to the inverse of their probability of selection. Estimates for public jail jurisdictions were adjusted for nonresponse by multiplying each estimate by the ratio of the total ADP in all jurisdictions to the ADP among participating jurisdictions. Survey estimates for public jail jurisdictions, private prisons and jails, and jails in Indian country are subject to sampling error. The error, as measured by an estimated sampling error, varies by the size of the estimate and the size of the base population. Estimates of the standard errors for selected survey items are presented in tables 13 and 14. These standard errors may be used to construct confidence intervals around survey estimates (e.g., numbers, rates, and percentages), as well as differences in these estimates. For example, the 95% confidence interval around the number of allegations of sexual violence is approximately 6,528 plus or minus 1.96 times 143 (or 6,248 to 6,808). Table 13. Estimated standard errors for number of allegations and substantiated incidents, by type, 2006 Allegations National Standard estimate error Total Inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Staff sexual misconduct Staff sexual harassment Substantiated incidents National Standard estimate error 6,528 143 967 72 2,205 68 263 23 834 2,371 1,118 16 106 41 157 469 78 6 68 8 Detail on substantiated incidents The 2006 Survey of Sexual Violence recorded 704 substantiated incidents of sexual violence; that is, incidents that were investigated and determined to have occurred. Taking into account sampling of local jail jurisdictions, private prisons and jails, and jails in Indian country, the estimated total for the Nation was 967. Correctional authorities provided detail on 99% of all substantiated incidents. Through use of a separate incident form, the survey collected details on circumstances surrounding each incident, characteristics of victims and perpetrators, type of pressure or physical force, sanctions imposed, and victim assistance. These data are displayed in Appendix tables 5 – 8. In response to concerns raised about the 2005 survey, BJS changed the survey item related to staff sexual misconduct and harassment. Item 27 of the 2006 survey read as follows: What was the nature of the incident? Table 14. Estimated standard errors for selected characteristics of substantiated incidents, by type, 2006 Characteristic National estimate Standard error Inmate-on-inmate sexual violence Occurred between 6 p.m. and midnight Occurred in victim's cell Force/threat of force used Victim injured Victim given medical examination Victim placed in administrative segregation Perpetrator placed in solitary Legal action imposed on perpetrator 45% 64 58 20 60 40 78 41 3% 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 Staff-on-inmate sexual violence Relationship appeared to be willing Occurred between 6 p.m. and midnight Occurred in victim's cell Victim placed in administrative segregation Victim transferred to another facility Legal sanction imposed on staff Staff discharged or resigned 57% 56 10 25 31 56 77 6% 7 3 5 8 6 6 (Mark all that apply.) 1. Pressure or abuse of power resulting in a nonconsensual sexual act 2. Indecent exposure, invasion of privacy, or voyeurism for sexual gratification 3. Unwanted touching for sexual gratification 4. Sexual harassment or repeated verbal statements of a sexual nature by staff 5. Sexual relationship between inmate and staff that appeared to be willing 6. Other – Specify 7. Level of coercion unknown Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 11 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics *NCJ~218914* PRESORTED STANDARD POSTAGE & FEES PAID DOJ/BJS Permit No. G-91 Washington, DC 20531 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 The Bureau of Justice Statistics is the statistical agency of the U.S. Department of Justice. Jeffrey L. Sedgwick is the director. Allen J. Beck, Paige M. Harrison and Devon B. Adams, wrote this report. Carolyn Williams produced and edited the report, and Jayne Robinson prepared the report for publication, under the supervision of Doris J. James. This report in portable document format (includes 8 appendix tables) and in ASCII and its related statistical data are available at the BJS World Wide Web Internet site: <http://www. ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/svrca06.htm> Office of Justice Programs Innovation • Partnerships • Safer Neighborhoods http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov 12 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Pamela H. Butler, Greta B. Clark, and Shannon Clerkin carried out data collection and processing, under the supervision of Charlene M. Sebold, Governments Division, Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. Pearl E. Chase, Patricia D. Torryson, Kathryn DiMeglio, and Lisa A. McNelis assisted in the data collection. Suzanne M. Dorinski drew the facility samples and provided sampling weights. August 2007, NCJ 218914. Appendix table 1a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by State or Federal prison authorities, by type, 2006 Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Prisoners in custody, Substan- UnsubInvestigaSubstan- UnsubInvestiga6/30/2006a Allegations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Allegations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Jurisdiction Total 1,367,204 1,390 147 707 304 232 707 125 426 139 17 Federal 161,871 State 1,205,333 Alabamab 23,995 Alaskab 3,540 Arizona 30,391 Arkansas 12,643 California 169,561 Colorado 17,204 Connecticut 19,606 Delaware 7,090 Florida 82,223 Georgiab 46,359 Hawaii 3,898 Idaho 4,735 Illinois 45,440 Indiana 22,539 Iowa 8,659 Kansas 8,952 Kentucky 12,967 Louisiana 17,387 Maine 2,028 Maryland 22,860 Massachusetts 10,683 Michigan 50,701 Minnesota 8,017 Mississippib 11,528 Missouri 30,149 Montanac 1,968 Nebraska 4,546 Nevadab 12,412 New Hampshire 2,522 New Jersey 23,987 New Mexico 3,876 New York 63,479 North Carolinab 37,277 North Dakota 1,370 Ohio 44,759 Oklahoma 17,149 Oregon 13,091 Pennsylvania 41,957 Rhode Island 3,645 South Carolinad 22,898 South Dakota 3,573 Tennessee 14,235 Texas 140,166 Utah 4,978 Vermont 1,678 Virginiab 29,539 Washington 15,289 West Virginiad 4,276 Wisconsinb 22,279 Wyoming 1,229 7 1,383 2 0 35 10 76 28 19 6 145 53 1 17 38 29 20 47 10 24 0 15 22 33 22 1 49 12 7 21 8 2 0 34 22 2 67 17 23 24 9 2 1 17 297 15 12 16 26 1 40 6 0 147 0 0 0 4 5 5 0 2 1 2 0 9 4 0 2 4 1 3 0 2 7 10 0 0 2 3 2 0 7 0 0 1 4 1 16 2 0 5 3 2 0 0 4 4 6 1 4 1 17 1 0 707 2 0 20 0 41 17 14 2 140 14 0 5 30 23 10 21 7 5 0 6 7 23 4 0 28 7 4 7 0 2 0 22 16 1 5 7 4 5 4 0 0 14 136 11 3 2 19 0 17 2 7 297 0 0 12 6 17 5 0 2 1 1 0 3 0 6 8 21 2 16 0 1 8 0 17 1 18 2 1 8 1 0 0 0 2 0 45 8 2 14 2 0 0 2 45 0 1 8 3 0 6 2 0 232 0 0 3 0 13 1 5 0 3 36 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 17 0 0 0 1 1 112 0 2 5 0 0 0 1 11 696 / / 4 5 8 15 3 0 22 / 0 17 0 15 34 13 6 2 0 1 32 18 5 / 15 4 7 / 1 1 0 16 / 5 34 0 2 1 3 0 3 7 349 15 18 / 7 0 / 8 1 124 / / 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 / 0 10 0 3 13 0 1 2 0 0 8 18 1 / 2 2 2 / 1 0 0 4 / 3 9 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 19 1 9 / 3 0 / 4 0 426 / / 2 0 5 11 0 0 22 / 0 6 0 8 14 3 5 0 0 0 16 0 2 / 7 1 4 / 0 1 0 5 / 2 5 0 2 0 1 0 0 4 279 12 5 / 3 0 / 1 9 130 / / 2 5 0 2 3 0 0 / 0 1 0 4 7 10 0 0 0 1 8 0 2 / 6 1 1 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 20 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 43 2 3 / 1 0 / 3 1 16 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 7 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 / 0 0 / 0 /Not reported a Excludes inmates in private facilities. Counts were based on National Prisoners Statistics (NPS-1A), 2006. b Allegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. c Includes consensual sexual acts between inmates. dAllegations limited to substantiated occurrences only. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 13 Appendix table 1b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported by State or Federal prison authorities, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction Total Federal State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevadaa New Hampshire New Jerseya New Mexicoa New York North Carolinaa North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Islanda South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texasb Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Substanti- UnsubstanInvestigation Allegations ated tiated Unfounded ongoing 1,677 235 745 309 388 984 47 537 258 142 133 1,544 4 0 26 7 52 44 12 2 152 133 0 14 23 32 48 41 7 71 2 17 61 27 15 5 73 2 13 11 3 2 0 209 9 3 89 25 14 24 2 0 3 14 79 6 20 39 34 7 53 15 4 231 1 0 8 4 11 8 1 0 0 6 0 7 11 7 11 4 5 9 0 0 7 2 2 2 7 1 2 1 1 0 0 19 8 0 4 7 3 7 0 0 2 8 10 0 10 13 5 6 6 5 50 695 3 0 10 0 15 6 9 2 131 26 0 5 9 16 15 30 1 42 1 6 6 8 6 1 24 0 2 6 1 0 0 119 1 1 78 15 4 5 0 0 0 4 28 5 5 2 24 0 20 3 0 309 0 0 6 3 14 23 0 0 10 0 0 2 0 9 21 7 1 18 1 5 17 16 5 2 40 1 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 6 2 2 12 2 0 0 0 10 1 5 17 5 1 27 5 79 309 0 0 2 0 12 7 2 0 11 101 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 6 31 1 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 71 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 31 0 0 7 0 0 0 2 91 893 3 0 8 19 30 8 0 2 144 73 1 3 0 8 39 4 0 66 2 1 11 337 0 0 21 2 2 / 1 / / 34 / 2 21 2 8 6 / 0 2 7 / 2 8 3 2 0 9 2 0 47 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 2 7 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 2 2 1 / 0 / / 2 / 0 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 2 / 1 4 1 1 0 2 2 46 491 3 0 4 4 11 1 0 2 133 21 0 2 0 4 13 3 0 31 0 1 5 179 0 0 15 0 1 / 1 / / 25 / 0 19 2 1 0 / 0 0 4 / 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 258 0 0 3 15 6 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 19 0 0 29 1 0 4 143 0 0 4 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 2 0 0 6 6 / 0 2 1 / 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 45 97 0 0 1 0 11 1 0 0 7 46 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 7 / 0 2 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 /Not reported aReports b Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Substanti- UnsubstanInvestigation Allegations ated tiated Unfounded ongoing of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. Reports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central database. 14 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 Average daily Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts population, Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubInvestigaJurisdiction and facility 2006 tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Total Alabama Butler County Calhoun Countya Cullman Countya Etowah County Jefferson Countya Shelby County Talledega Countya Tarrant City Alaska Seward County Kodiak City Arizona Coconino County Maricopa Countya Navajo County Pima County Arkansas Arkansas Countya Johnson Countya Sebastian County Siloam Springs Citya,b Washington Countya,b,c California Alameda County Contra Costa County El Dorado County Fresno Countya Kern County Los Angeles Countya Orange County Riverside County Sacramento Countya San Bernardino County West Valleya,b,c,d San Diego County San Francisco Citya San Joaquin Countya San Luis Obispo Countya San Mateo County Santa Barbara County Santa Clara County Santa Clara County Mountain View Santa Cruz Countya Ventura County Yuba County Colorado Arapahoe County Boulder County Denver County El Paso County Logan County Pueblo Countya Rio Grande Countya District of Columbia District of Columbia 380,894 403 52 192 123 36 73 19 38 14 2 36 370 194 800 964 503 226 9 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 / 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 509 9,247 354 1,858 0 16 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 109 29 322 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / / / 0 / 501 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 4,020 1,663 363 3,024 2,324 19,011 6,157 3,287 2,121 8 1 0 0 0 44 3 1 2 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 43 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 1 / 0 1 / 1 0 0 / 0 / 0 1 / 0 0 0 / 1 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 5,567 5,168 1,915 1,431 0 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 / 6 / / / 1 / / / 3 / / / 1 / / / 1 / / 531 1,124 980 4,471 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 2 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 2 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 184 537 1,651 419 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 1,335 470 2,475 1,433 120 526 32 2 1 9 2 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 1 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 3,473 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 15 Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 (cont). Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Average daily popu- Allega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigaJurisdiction and facility lation, 2006 tions tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing Florida Alachua Countya Broward Countya Escambia County Highlands County Hillsborough Countya Indian River Countya Jackson County Jacksonville City Lee Countyc Manatee County Marion Countya Martin County Miami-Dade Countya Orange Countya Palm Beach Countya Pinellas Countya Polk County St Lucie County Seminole County Taylor County Volusia County Georgia Atlanta City Bibb County Carroll County Corr. Inst. Carroll County Chatham Countya Clayton Countye Clinch County Cobb County DeKalb Countya Dougherty County Fulton County Glynn Countya Gwinnett Countya Houston County Jackson Countya Lamar Countya Lee County Murray Countya Muscogee Countya Newton Countyc Rockdale County Spalding County Idaho Benewah County Canyon County Kootenai Countya Illinois Champaign Countya Cook Countya Du Page County Lake Countya McLean County St Clair Countya,b Schuyler Countya,b,c Whiteside County 1,065 5,662 1,908 386 4,637 559 233 3,629 1,899 1,466 1,881 595 6,686 4,104 1,902 3,630 2,523 1,349 1,017 84 1,536 8 12 1 0 4 6 0 0 3 1 3 0 1 0 3 0 6 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 9 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 3 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 8 0 1 / 1 / / / / 2 1 0 0 2 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 1 / / / / 0 1 0 0 2 / / 0 0 / / 0 5 0 1 / 0 / / / / 2 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 3 0 0 / 0 / / / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / / / 0 0 0 0 0 1,079 637 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 525 513 1,622 1,585 20 2,042 2,849 876 143 428 2,280 420 172 135 69 106 588 553 * 461 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 / / 0 2 / 0 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 * 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 * 0 0 0 / / 0 1 / 0 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 * 0 0 0 / / 0 1 / 0 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 * 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 * 0 19 683 370 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 213 9,359 824 603 230 427 27 98 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 1 / 0 / / 0 / / 1 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 16 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 (cont.) Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Average daily popu- Allega- Substanti- UnsubInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubInvestigaJurisdiction and facility lation, 2006 tions ated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Indiana Allen County Howard County Kosciusko Countya Lake County La Porte County Marion County Montgomery County Porter County Pulaski Countya,c Union County Iowa Adams County Dubuque Countya Jasper County Linn Countya Kansas Crawford County Graham Countye,f Johnson County Meade County Shawnee County Kentucky Calloway Countyb Estill County Franklin County Kenton County Laurel County Lexington-Fayette County Louisville Metropolitan Dept. of Corr.a Pulaski Countya,d Rockcastle County Warren County Louisiana Bayou Dorcheat Corr. Ctr.a,c East Baton Rouge Prison Grant Parish Jefferson Parisha Madison Corr. Ctr.a,b Ouachita Parish New Orleans Parisha St. Charles Parisha St. Tammany Parisha,b Tangipahoa Parish Union Parisha Vermilion Parish Terrebonne Parisha Maine Cumberland County York Countya Maryland Allegany County Baltimore City Baltimore Countya Frederick Countya Prince Georges County Washington County Worcester Countya 736 378 186 902 275 334 144 468 2 22 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 6 116 60 389 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 97 7 880 29 435 0 / 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 172 26 308 428 327 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 256 82 565 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 481 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 1,778 103 738 600 25 1,896 552 0 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 / / 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 / / 1 0 / / 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 / / 687 520 313 146 636 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / 474 187 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 167 3,708 1,290 496 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 1,439 391 223 2 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 17 Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 (cont.) Jurisdiction and facility Massachusetts Berkshire County Essex Countya Hampden Countya Plymouth County Suffolk County Worcester County Michigan Allegan County Genesee Countya Gogebic County Jackson County Macomb County Monroe County Oakland County Ottawa County Wayne Countya Minnesota Hennepin County Mille Lacs County Pipestone County Sherburne Countyb,c Washington County Mississippi Adams County Desoto County Harrison Countya Hinds Countya Humphreys County Issaquena Countya,c Kemper-Neshoda County Reg. Corr. Fac.e Leake County Winston/Chocktaw Reg. Corr. Fac. Missouri Cass Countya Howard Countya Lincoln County St Charles County St. Louis City St. Louis County Taney Countya Vernon County Montana Anaconda-Deer Lodge Countya Cascade County Yellowstone Countya,b Nebraska Clay County Douglas County Lancaster County Nevada Clark County Las Vegas Citya,d Washoe County New Hampshire Rockingham County Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Average daily popu- Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubInvestigalation, 2006 tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing 257 1,167 2,017 1,598 1,760 1,397 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 2 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / / 0 2 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 163 638 26 409 1,348 367 1,973 369 3,005 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 3 0 0 1 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 / 0 0 2 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 586 71 11 510 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 368 815 925 27 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 283 345 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 11 152 282 1,727 993 69 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / 0 26 427 409 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / 7 976 429 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,540 1,119 1,137 0 1 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 / 4 0 / 0 1 / 2 1 / 2 0 / 0 338 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 (cont.) Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Average daily popu- Allega- Substanti- UnsubInvestigaAllega- Substanti- UnsubInvestigaJurisdiction and facility lation, 2006 tions ated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions ated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing New Jersey Atlantic County Camden County Cape May County Cumberland Countyd Essex County Gloucester County Hudson Countya Passaic Countya Union County New Mexico Bernalillo Countya Dona Ana Countya Luna Countya Otero County Quay Countya New York Albany County Allegany Countya,b Broome County Dutchess County Erie Countya Montgomery County Nassau Countyc New York Citya Suffolk Countya North Carolina Buncombe County Cabarrus County Carteret Countyd Cumberland County Gaston County Mecklenburg County Rockingham County Swain County Wake County North Dakota Burleigh County Rolette County Ohio Cuyahoga County Franklin Countya Greene County Hamilton County Logan Countya Lorain County Montgomery Countya Noble County Northwest Ohio Reg. Corr. Ctr.a Richland County Warren Countya Oklahoma Garfield Countya Grady Countyf Harmon Countye,f Oklahoma County Pawnee Countya Oregon Marion County Multnomah County Northern Oregon Reg. Fac. Washington County 1,358 1,646 279 575 2,081 358 2,008 1,946 1,122 0 3 2 2 0 0 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 2,377 890 394 242 80 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 / / / / 0 / / / / 0 / / / / 0 / / / / 0 / 832 53 527 309 925 119 1,633 13,788 1,632 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / / 458 230 122 532 526 2,484 165 44 1,240 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,066 2,377 380 2,157 108 476 904 15 3 1 0 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 3 / 0 / 0 1 / 0 3 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 581 131 193 4 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / 182 324 7 2,859 9 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 4 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 4 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / 540 1,673 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 169 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 19 Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 (cont.) Jurisdiction and facility Pennsylvania Allegheny Countya Beaver County Berks County Bucks County Clinton Countya Erie County Lycoming County Philadelphia Prison System Schuykill Countya Warren County Westmoreland County York Countya,c South Carolina Anderson County Charleston Countya Cherokee County Greenville County Marlboro County Spartanburg Countya Sumter-Lee Reg. Det. Ctr. South Dakota Charles Mix County Pennington County Tennessee Blount Countya Cheatham Countyd Clay Countya Davidson County Madison County Marion County McMinn Countyb,c,d Shelby County Corr. Ctr. Shelby County Justice Ctr.a Sullivan County Washington County Texas Bell County Bexar Countya Culberson County Dallas Countya Denton Countya Ector County Ellis County El Paso Countya Harris County Hays Countya,b Hidalgo Countyb Live Oak County McLennan County Milam Countya Montgomery County Orange Countya Rusk Countya Tarrant County Tom Green Countya Travis County Walker County Webb Countya Wharton Countya Wichita Countya Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Average daily popu- Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubInvestigalation, 2006 tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing 2,584 * 1,324 987 332 740 * 2 * 2 2 0 0 * 0 * 1 0 0 0 * 2 * 0 1 0 0 * 0 * 1 1 0 0 * 0 * 0 0 0 0 * / * 1 1 / 0 * / * 1 1 / 0 * / * 0 0 / 0 * / * 0 0 / 0 * / * 0 0 / 0 * 8,603 270 120 598 2,031 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 / 1 / 0 0 / 433 1,722 160 * 71 808 0 4 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 3 0 * 0 0 0 1 0 * 0 0 0 / 0 * 0 / 0 / 0 * 0 / 0 / 0 * 0 / 0 / 0 * 0 / 0 / 0 * 0 / 430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 421 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 347 95 12 2,297 331 80 188 2,288 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 2,741 588 500 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 689 4,027 13 6,324 1,020 529 * 2,090 9,249 315 1,128 23 860 95 1,067 214 86 3,356 514 2,584 150 681 130 495 1 0 0 2 0 0 * 0 17 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 * 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 * / 6 / 0 0 1 / 0 / / 0 / 2 0 / / / 0 / 0 / / 0 * / 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / / 0 / 0 / / 0 * / 5 / 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 2 0 / / / 0 / 0 / / 0 * / 0 / 0 0 1 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / / 0 / 0 / / 0 * / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 0 / / / 20 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 (cont.) Jurisdiction and facility Utah Daggett County Davis County Salt Lake Countya Weber Countya Virginia Abingdon Reg. Jail Fac. Augusta County Blue Ridge Reg. Jail Auth. Gloucester County Middle River Reg. Jail New River Valley Reg. Jaila Norfolk City Northern Neck Reg. Jail Peumansend Creek Reg. Jaila Portsmouth City Prince William-Manassas Reg. Adult Corr. Ctr.a Richmond City Riverside Reg. Jail Virginia Beach Municipala Washington Clark County Cowlitz County Issaquah County King Countya Pierce Countya Spokane County Whatcom County West Virginia Eastern Reg. Jail Marshall County Northern Reg. Jail & Corr. Complex North Central Reg. Jaila Raleigh County Southern Reg. Jaila Wisconsin Dane Countyg Jefferson Countyc Milwaukee County Milwaukee County House of Corr.a Outagamie Countye Racine County Vernon County Walworth Countya Wyoming Laramie County Uinta County Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Average daily popu- Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubInvestigalation, 2006 tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing 92 500 1,963 1,024 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 383 230 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,170 75 517 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 630 1,733 423 4 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 295 557 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 721 1,564 1,096 1,501 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / 790 277 54 2,666 1,359 569 358 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 1 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 1 0 0 0 / / 0 0 386 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 323 524 1 11 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 521 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 931 183 886 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 2,331 460 683 49 343 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / 268 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /Not reported. *No response. a Allegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. b Allegations limited to substantiated occurrences only. c Allegations limited to completed acts only. dBased e f on jail population on December 31, 2006. Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database. Jurisdiction does not record allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. g Jurisdiction cannot access allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts or abusive sexual contacts electronically. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 21 Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction and facility Total Alabama Butler Countya Calhoun Countya Cullman County Etowah County Jefferson Countya Shelby County Talledega Countya Tarrant City Alaska Seward County Kodiak City Arizona Coconino County Maricopa Countya Navajo Countya Pima County Arkansas Arkansas Countya Johnson Countya Sebastian County Siloam Springs Cityb Washington Countya,b California Alameda County Contra Costa County El Dorado County Fresno Countya Kern County Los Angeles County Orange County Riverside County Sacramento County San Bernardino County West Valleya San Diego County San Francisco City San Joaquin Countya San Luis Obispo Countya San Mateo County Santa Barbara County Santa Clara Countya Santa Clara County Mountain View Santa Cruz Countya Ventura County Yuba County Colorado Arapahoe County Boulder County Denver Countyb El Paso County Logan County Pueblo County Rio Grande Countya,b District of Columbia District of Columbia Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigations tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing 217 58 58 66 35 35 9 11 10 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 1 / 0 / 0 / / 0 0 / 0 / 0 / / 0 0 / 0 / 0 / / 0 1 / 0 / 0 / / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / / / 0 0 / 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 0 / / 0 1 / / 0 0 / / 0 1 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 2 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 10 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 22 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction and facility Florida Alachua County Broward County Escambia County Highlands County Hillsborough County Indian River Countya Jackson County Jacksonville City Lee County Manatee County Marion County Martin County Miami-Dade Countya Orange County Palm Beach Countya Pinellas County Polk County St Lucie County Seminole County Taylor County Volusia County Georgia Atlanta City Bibb County Carroll County Corr. Inst.a Carroll County Chatham County Clayton Countya Clinch County Cobb County DeKalb Countya Dougherty County Fulton County Glynn County Gwinnett County Houston County Jackson County Lamar Countya Lee County Murray County Muscogee Countya,b Newton County Rockdale County Spalding County Idaho Benewah County Canyon County Kootenai County Illinois Champaign County Cook Countya Du Page County Lake County McLean County St Clair Countya,b Schuyler County Whiteside Countya Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 1 / 0 1 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 * 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 * 0 0 1 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 * 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 * 0 0 0 / 0 1 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 * 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 23 Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction and facility Indiana Allen County Howard County Kosciusko Countya Lake Countya La Porte County Marion Countya Montgomery County Porter County Pulaski County Union County Iowa Adams County Dubuque Countya Jasper County Linn Countyc Kansas Crawford County Graham Countyc,d Johnson County Meade County Shawnee County Kentucky Calloway Countyb Estill County Franklin County Kenton County Laurel Countya Lexington-Fayette County Louisville Metropolitan Dept. of Corr. Pulaski Countyc,d Rockcastle County Warren County Louisiana Bayou Dorcheat Corr. Ctr. East Baton Rouge Prison Grant Parish Jefferson Parish Madison Corr. Ctr.b Ouachita Parish New Orleans Parisha St. Charles Parish St. Tammany Parishb Tangipahoa Parish Union Parish Vermilion Parish Terrebonne Parish Maine Cumberland County York County Maryland Allegany County Baltimore City Baltimore County Frederick Countya Prince Georges County Washington County Worcester Countya Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigations tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigations tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 6 0 / 0 0 3 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 3 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 24 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction and facility Massachusetts Berkshire County Essex Countya Hampden County Plymouth County Suffolk County Worcester County Michigan Allegan County Genesee County Gogebic County Jackson County Macomb County Monroe County Oakland Countya Ottawa County Wayne County Minnesota Hennepin County Mille Lacs County Pipestone County Sherburne Countyb Washington County Mississippi Adams County Desoto County Harrison Countya Hinds Countya Humphreys County Issaquena County Kemper-Neshoda County Reg. Corr. Fac. Leake County Winston/Chocktaw Reg. Corr. Fac. Missouri Cass County Howard County Lincoln County St Charles County St. Louis City St. Louis County Taney County Vernon County Montana Anaconda-Deer Lodge Countya Cascade County Yellowstone Countya Nebraska Clay County Douglas County Lancaster County Nevada Clark County Las Vegas Citya,d Washoe County New Hampshire Rockingham County Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Allega- Substanti- UnsubInvestigations ated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substanti- UnsubInvestigations ated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing 1 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / / 0 / 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 / 1 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 1 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 25 Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction and facility New Jersey Atlantic Countya Camden County Cape May Countya Cumberland County Essex County Gloucester County Hudson Countya Passaic County Union County New Mexico Bernalillo Countya Dona Ana County Luna Countya Otero County Quay Countya New York Albany County Allegany Countyb Broome County Dutchess County Erie County Montgomery County Nassau County New York Citya Suffolk County North Carolina Buncombe County Cabarrus County Carteret Countya Cumberland Countya Gaston Countya Mecklenburg County Rockingham County Swain County Wake County North Dakota Burleigh County Rolette County Ohio Cuyahoga County Franklin County Greene County Hamilton County Logan County Lorain County Montgomery Countya Noble County Northwest Ohio Reg. Corr. Ctr.a Richland County Warren County Oklahoma Garfield County Grady County Harmon Countyc,d Oklahoma County Pawnee County Oregon Marion County Multnomah County Northern Oregon Reg. Fac.b Washington County Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction and facility Pennsylvania Allegheny County Beaver County Berks County Bucks County Clinton County Erie County Lycoming County Philadelphia Prison Systema Schuykill County Warren County Westmoreland County York Countya,b South Carolina Anderson Countya Charleston County Cherokee County Greenville County Marlboro County Spartanburg County Sumter-Lee Reg. Det. Ctr. South Dakota Charles Mix County Pennington County Tennessee Blount Countya Cheatham Countya Clay County Davidson County Madison County Marion Countya McMinn Countyb Shelby County Corr. Ctr. Shelby County Justice Ctr. Sullivan County Washington County Texas Bell County Bexar Countya Culberson County Dallas County Denton County Ector County Ellis County El Paso Countya Harris County Hays Countya Hidalgo County Live Oak County McLennan County Milam Countya Montgomery County Orange Countya Rusk Countya Tarrant Countyc Tom Green Countya Travis County Walker Countya Webb Countya Wharton Countya Wichita Countya Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing 2 * 0 0 0 0 * 16 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 * 8 0 0 0 0 2 * 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 * 8 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 * / 0 0 0 / 0 * 0 0 0 0 * / 0 0 0 / 0 * 0 0 0 0 * / 0 0 0 / 0 * 0 0 0 0 * / 0 0 0 / 0 * 0 0 0 0 * / 0 0 0 / 0 7 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 2 0 * 0 0 0 0 4 0 * 0 0 0 0 1 0 * 0 0 0 / 0 0 * 0 1 0 / 0 0 * 0 0 0 / 0 0 * 0 0 0 / 0 0 * 0 1 0 / 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 3 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 2 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 1 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 * 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 * / 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 / / / / 2 / / / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 * / 1 / 0 0 0 / 0 / / / / 2 / / / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 * / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / / / / 0 / / / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 * / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / / / / 0 / / / / 0 / 0 0 0 0 * / 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 / / / / 0 / / / / Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 27 Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction and facility Utah Daggett County Davis County Salt Lake County Weber County Virginia Abingdon Reg. Jail Fac. Augusta County Blue Ridge Reg. Jail Auth. Gloucester County Middle River Reg. Jail New River Valley Reg. Jail Norfolk City Northern Neck Reg. Jail Peumansend Creek Reg. Jaila,b Portsmouth Cityb Prince William-Manassas Reg. Adult Corr. Ctr.b Richmond City Riverside Reg. Jail Virginia Beach Municipala Washington Clark County Cowlitz County Issaquah County King County Pierce Countyc Spokane County Whatcom County West Virgina Eastern Reg. Jail Marshall County Northern Reg. Jail & Corr. Complex North Central Reg. Jail Raleigh County Southern Reg. Jail Wisconsin Dane County Jefferson County Milwaukee County Milwaukee County House of Corr.a Outagamie County Racine County Vernon County Walworth Countya Wyoming Laramie County Uinta County Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigations tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigations tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 1 1 0 11 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 2 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / / 0 0 0 / 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /Not reported. *No response. a Allegations of staff sexual harrassment could not be counted separately from allegations of staff sexual misconduct. b Reports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only. cReports d of staff sexual harrassment are not recorded in a central database. Reports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central database. 28 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 3a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported in private prisons and jails, 2006 Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Average daily popula- Allega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigaJurisdiction and facility tion, 2006 tions tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing Total Arizona Eloy Det. Ctr. (CCA)a Phoenix CCC (BSS)a California California City Corr. Ctr. (CCA) Central Valley Community Corr. (GEO) San Diego County Probation Dept. (CAI) Taft Corr. Inst. (GEO) Colorado Cheyenne Martain ReEntry Ctr. (CEC) Crowley County Corr. Fac. (CCA) Longmont Community Treatment Ctr. (CMI) Florida Bay Corr. Inst. (CCA) Bay County Jail & Annex (CCA) South Bay Corr. Fac. (GEO) Suncoast Work Release Ctr. (Goodwill) Georgia Coffee Corr. Fac. (CCA) D. Ray James Prison (Cornell) McRae Corr. Fac. (CCA) Kentucky Owensboro (Dismas) Louisiana Allen Corr. Ctr. (GEO)a,b Minnesota Prairie Corr. Fac. (CCA) Mississippi East Mississippi Corr. Fac. (GEO)c Tallahatchie County Corr. Fac. (CCA) Wilkinson County Corr. Fac. (CCA) Montana Crossroads Corr. Ctr. (CCA)a Nevada Cornell Corr. (Cornell)a New Jersey Kintock I, II, III (Kintock)a New Mexico New Mexico Women's Corr. Fac. (CCA)b 48,594 51 1 19 28 3 6 0 5 0 1 1,241 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / / / / / / 2,603 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 2,330 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 467 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,277 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 747 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 850 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1,856 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,680 13 0 0 13 0 2 0 2 0 0 1,640 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1,665 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,540 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 1,480 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 857 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 1,002 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 946 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 504 1 0 0 1 0 / / / / / 75 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 595 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 616 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 29 Appendix table 3a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported in private prisons and jails, 2006 (cont.) Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Average daily popula- Allega- Substanti- UnsubInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubInvestigaJurisdiction and facility tion, 2006 tions ated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing Ohio Fresh Start, Inc. Lake Erie Corr. Inst. (MTC) Oklahoma Center Point, Inc.a Cimarron Corr. Fac. (CCA) Diamondback Corr. Fac. (CCA) Lawton Corr. Fac. (GEO)a Pennsylvania George W. Hill Corr. Fac. (GEO) Kintock Pre-Release (Kintock) Tennessee Hardeman County Corr. Ctr. (CCA)b Metro Davidson County Det. Fac. (CCA) South Central Corr. Ctr. (CCA) Texas Bartlett (CCA) B.M. Moore (CCA) Bridgeport PreParole Fac. (CCA) Dawson State Jail (CCA)a Dickens County Corr. Ctr. (GEO)a Mineral Wells PreParole Fac. (CCA)a Reeves County Det. Ctr. (GEO) Willacy County State Jail (CCA)a Virginia Lawrenceville Corr. Ctr. (GEO) 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,464 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 963 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,980 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,016 10 0 5 3 2 / / / / / 1,801 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 283 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,966 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 992 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,634 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 996 498 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 519 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,182 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 474 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 2,075 1 0 0 1 0 / / / / / 780 6 0 6 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1,057 3 0 0 3 0 / / / / / 1,567 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: Initials identify the following: BSS - Behavioral Systems Southwest. CAI - Correctional Alternatives Incorporated. CCA - Corrections Corporation of America. CEC - Community Education Center. CMI - Correctional Management, Inc. Cornell - Cornell Companies, Incorporated. GEO - Global Expertise in Outsourcing. MTC - Management and Training Corporation. /Not reported. a Allegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. b Allegations limited to substantiated occurrences only. cDoes not record allegations of abusive sexual contact in a central database. 30 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 3b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction and facility Total Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigations tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing 39 Arizona Eloy Det. Ctr. (CCA)a 0 Phoenix CCC (BSS)a,b 0 California California City Corr. Ctr. (CCA) 1 Central Valley Community Corr. (GEO) 0 San Diego County Probation Dept. (CAI) 0 Taft Corr. Inst. (GEO) 1 Colorado Cheyenne Martain Re-Entry Ctr. (CEC) 0 Crowley County Corr. Fac. (CCA) 0 Longmont Community Treatment Ctr. (CMI) 0 Florida Bay Corr. Inst. (CCA) 1 Bay County Jail & Annex (CCA) 0 South Bay Corr. Fac. (GEO) 0 Suncoast Work Release Ctr. (Goodwill) 0 Georgia Coffee Corr. Fac. (CCA) 11 D. Ray James Prison (Cornell) 4 McRae Corr. Fac. (CCA) 2 Kentucky Owensboro (Dismas) 0 Louisiana Allen Corr. Ctr. (GEO)b 0 Minnesota Prairie Corr. Fac. (CCA) 2 Mississippi East Mississippi Corr. Fac. (GEO) 0 Tallahatchie County Corr. Fac. (CCA) 1 Wilkinson County Corr. Fac. (CCA) 0 Montana Crossroads Corr. Ctr. (CCA)a 0 Nevada Cornell Corr. (Cornell)a 0 New Jersey Kintock I, II, III (Kintock) 0 New Mexico New Mexico Women's Corr. Fac. (CCA) 0 Ohio Fresh Start, Inc. 0 Lake Erie Corr. Inst. (MTC) 0 6 21 7 5 11 0 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / / / / / / 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 31 Appendix table 3b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2006 (cont.) Jurisdiction and facility Oklahoma Center Point, Inc. Cimarron Corr. Fac. (CCA) Diamondback Corr. Fac. (CCA) Lawton Corr. Fac. (GEO)a Pennsylvania George W. Hill Corr. Fac. (GEO) Kintock Pre-Release (Kintock) Tennessee Hardeman County Corr. Ctr. (CCA) Metro Davidson County Det. Fac. (CCA) South Central Corr. Ctr. (CCA) Texas Bartlett (CCA) B.M. Moore (CCA) Bridgeport Pre-Parole Fac. (CCA)a Dawson State Jail (CCA)a Dickens County Corr. Ctr. (GEO)a Mineral Wells Pre-Parole Fac. (CCA)a Reeves County Det. Ctr. (GEO) Willacy County State Jail (CCA)a Virginia Lawrenceville Corr. Ctr. (GEO) Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubstanInvestigations tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated tiated Unfounded tion ongoing 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 / / / / / / / / / / 1 1 0 0 0 / / / / / 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: Initials identify the following: BSS - Behavioral Systems Southwest. CAI - Correctional Alternatives Incorporated. CCA - Corrections Corporation of America. CEC - Community Education Center. CMI - Correctional Management, Inc. Cornell - Cornell Companies, Incorporated. GEO - Global Expertise in Outsourcing. MTC - Management and Training Corporation. /Not reported. a Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. bReports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only. 32 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 4a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported in other correctional facilties, by type, 2006 Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Average daily popula- Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigaAllega- Substanti- UnsubInvestigaJurisdiction and facility tion, 2006 tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions ated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing U.S. Military Total Air Force Army Marines Navy U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Total Aguadilla, PR Aurora, CO Batavia, NY El Centro, CA Elizabeth, NJ El Paso, TXa,b,c Florence, AZa Houston, TXa Laredo, TX Los Fresnos, TX Miami, FL San Diego, CA San Pedro, CA Tacoma, WAa Jails in Indian Country Total Gila River Dept. of Corr. & Rehab., AZa Hopi Rehab. Ctr., AZ Klyuska O'Tipi Reintegration Ctr., SDa Ponca Tribal Police Dept., OK Red Lake Law Enforcement Services, MN Rocky Boy Police Dept., MT Rosebud Sioux Tribe Law Enforcement, SD Taos Tribal Det. Ctr., NM Yakama Police Dept., WA 1,937 91 1,019 194 633 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,033 32 381 454 456 297 785 617 830 335 810 677 1,196 388 775 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / 0 0 0 0 0 / 279 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / / 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /Not reported. a Allegations of abusive sexual contacts could not be counted separately from allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts. b Allegations limited to substantiated incidents only. cAllegations limited to completed acts only. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 33 Appendix table 4b. Allegations of staff-on-inmate sexual violence reported in other correctional facilities, by type, 2006 Jurisdiction and facility Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates Allega- Substan- UnsubInvestigaAllega- Substan- UnsubInvestigation tions tiated stantiated Unfounded tion ongoing tions tiated stantiated Unfounded ongoing U.S. Military Total Air Force Army Marines Navy U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Total Aguadilla, PR Aurora, CO Batavia, NY El Centro, CA Elizabeth, NJ El Paso, TX Florence, AZ Houston, TX* Laredo, TX Los Fresnos, TX Miami, FL San Diego, CA San Pedro, CA Tacoma, WA Jails in Indian Country Total Gila River Dept. of Corr. & Rehab. AZ Hopi Rehab. Ctr., AZ Klyuska O'Tipi Reintegration Ctr., SD Ponca Tribal Police Dept., OK Red Lake Law Enforcement Services, MN Rocky Boy Police Dept., MT Rosebud Sioux Tribe Law Enforcement, SD Taos Tribal Det. Ctr., NM Yakama Police Dept., WA 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /Not reported. *Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. 34 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 5. Characteristics of victims in substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, by type, 2006 Characteristic Number of incidents Number of victims 1 2 3 4 or more Genderb Male Female Ageb Under 18 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45 or older Race/Hispanic originb Whitec Blackc Hispanic Otherc,d All facilitiesa Prison Jail 410 272 132 92% 7 1 <1 92% 8 <1 <1 93% 6 1 0 82% 18 80% 20 84% 16 4% 40 18 12 10 6 9 1% 37 21 15 7 8 11 13% 44 14 6 15 3 5 72% 16 9 3 76% 13 8 3 65% 21 12 1 aIncludes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. bBased on characteristics of victims for whom gender (443), age (442), or race/Hispanic origin (445) were reported. c Excludes perpetrators of Hispanic origin. d Includes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. Appendix table 6. Characteristics of perpetrators in substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, by type, 2006 Characteristic Number of incidents Number of perpetrators 1 2 3 4 or more Genderb Male Female Ageb Under 18 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45 or older Race/Hispanic originb Whitec Blackc Hispanic Otherc,d All facilitiesa Prison Jail 410 272 132 90% 6 2 1 90% 7 2 1 90% 5 5 0 85% 15 82% 18 92% 8 1% 19 21 19 13 12 16 1% 20 16 19 15 9 19 0% 14 31 19 9 18 9 39% 49 10 2 48% 43 7 2 22% 60 15 4 Note: Detail may not sum to 100% due to rounding. aIncludes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. bBased on characteristics of perpetrators for whom gender (448), age (443), or race/Hispanic origin (444) were reported. c Excludes perpetrators of Hispanic origin. dIncludes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 35 Appendix table 7. Circumstances surrounding substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence, by type, 2006 All facilities* Number of incidents Type of pressure or force None Force/threat of force Threatened with physical harm Physically held down or restrained Physically harmed or injured Threatened with a weapon Persuasion or talked into it Bribery/blackmail Gave victim drugs/alcohol Offered protection from other inmates Where occurred In victim's cell/room In perpetrator's cell/room In a dormitory In a common area In temporary holding area In a program service area Outside the facility While in transit Time of dayb 6 a.m. to noon Noon to 6 p.m. 6 p.m. to midnight Midnight to 6 a.m. Who reported the incident Victim Another inmate Family of victim Correctional officer Administrative staff Medical/healthcare staff Counselor/teacher Chaplain/other religious official 409 Prison 272 Jail Nonconsensual sexual acts Abusive sexual contacts 250 159 131 21% 58 32 34 15 2 30 3 1 21% 53 24 27 15 2 32 3 <1 18% 70 47 51 16 4 29 4 2 14% 67 43 38 18 4 32 3 1 31% 44 14 28 10 0 28 4 0 3 3 3 4 1 64% 5 9 17 <1 6 2 <1 57% 6 10 22 0 8 1 <1 79% 5 7 7 1 2 2 0 76% 5 6 11 0 5 <1 0 46% 6 14 26 1 6 3 1 20% 26 45 26 22% 28 46 20 15% 21 41 37 17% 18 47 32 24% 37 41 17 70% 13 1 17 2 1 <1 1 66% 10 2 23 1 2 <1 1 75% 21 0 5 2 0 0 0 72% 16 <1 12 0 1 <1 1 65% 9 2 24 4 1 0 0 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. *Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. 36 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 Appendix table 8. Impact on victim and perpetrator in substantiated incidents of inmate-oninmate sexual violence, by type, 2006 Incident impact Victim injured No Yesb Anal/vaginal tearing Teeth chipped/knocked out Bruises, black eye, sprains, cuts, scratches, swelling Medical followup for victim Given medical examination Administered rape kit Tested for HIV/AIDS Tested for other STD Provided counseling or mental health treatment None of the above Change in housing/custody for victim Placed in administrative segregation or protective custody Placed in medical unit Confined to own cell/room Given higher custody level Transferred to another facility/elsewhere in facility Other (reported after release/transfer) None of the above Sanction imposed on perpetrator Solitary/disciplinary Confined to own cell/room Placed in higher custody Transferred to another facility Loss of good time Given extra work Loss of privileges Legal action Arrested Referred for prosecution Given new sentence Disciplinary report issued All facilitiesa Prison Jail Nonconsensual Abusive sexual sexual acts contacts 80% 20 5 1 81% 19 6 0 76% 24 5 2 74% 26 8 1 87% 13 1 0 13 12 15 14 12 60% 22 11 12 54% 20 11 11 74% 28 13 14 70% 34 19 19 45% 3 0 0 50 22 56 25 40 16 53 17 45 30 40% 13 9 2 46% 7 10 2 30% 24 5 2 45% 19 7 2 31% 3 11 1 16 6 24 21 2 26 7 15 20 16 7 16 17 4 39 78% 16 22 22 24 2 20 41 16 33 5 5 77% 17 21 25 26 2 25 30 3 26 4 7 81% 13 26 16 20 0 12 67 42 49 9 0 81% 18 24 24 20 2 23 56 21 46 6 4 75% 12 20 17 31 1 16 18 6 13 4 6 Note: Detail may sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed for each item. a Includes substantiated incidents reported by private prisons and jails, Indian country jails, and facilities operated by the U.S. military and ICE. b The categories "knife or stab wounds," “broken bones,” "internal injuries," and "knocked unconscious" were not marked in any incident. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006 37