Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Letcher Co KY Prison, BOP, Mar 2016
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
REVISED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR PROPOSED UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY AND FEDERAL PRISON CAMP Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Capacity Planning and Construction Branch March 2016 (This page intentionally left blank) REVISED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR PROPOSED UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY AND FEDERAL PRISON CAMP LETCHER COUNTY, KENTUCKY March 2016 Lead Agency: Federal Bureau of Prisons Title of Proposed Action: United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Letcher County, Kentucky Point of Contact: Mr. Issac Gaston, Site Selection Specialist Federal Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street NW Washington, DC 20534 igaston@bop.gov Abstract The Federal Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) has prepared this Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of site acquisition and development of a proposed United States Penitentiary (USP) and Federal Prison Camp (FPC) in Letcher County, Kentucky. This Revised Final EIS supersedes the Final EIS published in July 2015. The Bureau withdrew the July 2015 Final EIS after consideration of comments received following its publication and to correct inconsistencies in the Final EIS. Also, as a result of comments received following release of the Final EIS, the Bureau concluded that written notice of availability of the Final EIS had not been directly provided to at least 22 parties who had requested it. With publication of this Revised Final EIS, the public, including any parties who may not have received timely notice of the Final EIS publication, are being afforded a new 30-day review period within which to submit comments so that they can be considered by the Bureau prior to and in connection with a Record of Decision for the proposed action. The Revised Final EIS makes no change to the proposed action, which is to acquire the property and construct and operate a new USP, FPC, ancillary facilities, and access roads. The purpose of the proposed federal correctional facility in Letcher County, Kentucky, is to develop additional high-security facilities to increase capacity for current inmate populations in the Mid-Atlantic Region based on an identified need for additional bedspace. The Bureau has determined that there is a need for additional high-security facilities within this region to reduce the demonstrated overcrowding that compromises the mission of the Bureau. The Revised Final EIS analyzes the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the No Action Alternative and two build alternatives, Alternative 1 – Payne Gap and Alternative 2 – Roxana, with regard to land use and zoning, topography, geology, and soils, socioeconomics and environmental justice, community facilities and services, transportation and traffic, air quality, noise, infrastructure and utilities, cultural, water, and biological resources, and hazardous substances. The Bureau has identified Alternative 2 – Roxana as the preferred alternative. (This page intentionally left blank) Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Federal Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) has prepared this Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to analyze the impacts associated with the proposed construction and operation of a new United States Penitentiary (USP), Federal Prison Camp (FPC), and associated ancillary facilities in Letcher County, Kentucky. The Bureau published the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Letcher County, Kentucky on July 31, 2015. In consideration of comments received following publication of the Final EIS and to correct inconsistencies in the Final EIS, the Bureau concluded the Final EIS would be withdrawn and a Revised Final EIS would be issued. A Revised Final EIS would enable the Bureau to provide more complete discussion of some topics addressed in the Final EIS, and provide more complete responses to comments received on the Draft EIS than were provided in the FEIS. Also, as a result of comments received following release of the Final EIS, the Bureau concluded that written notice of availability of the Final EIS had not been directly provided to at least 22 parties who had requested it; therefore, those parties received less than the intended, full 30-day review period in which to submit comments on the Final EIS. By publishing this Revised Final EIS and by providing a 30-day review period, the public, including any parties who may not have received timely notice of the Final EIS publication, are being afforded a new 30-day review period within which to submit comments on the Revised Final EIS so that they can be considered by the Bureau prior to and in connection with a Record of Decision for the proposed action. This EIS has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality regulations implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500–1508), and the U.S. Department of Justice procedures for implementing NEPA (28 CFR 61). PURPOSE AND NEED The purpose of the proposed federal correctional facility in Letcher County, Kentucky, is to provide an additional high-security penitentiary and an associated prison camp to increase capacity for current inmate populations in the Mid-Atlantic Region based on an identified need for additional bedspace. The Bureau has determined that there is a need for additional high-security facilities within this region to reduce the demonstrated overcrowding that compromises the mission of the Bureau. PROPOSED ACTION This Revised Final EIS makes no change to the proposed action. The proposed action evaluated in this Revised Final EIS is the acquisition of property and the construction and operation of a federal correctional facility in Letcher County, Kentucky. The Bureau proposes to acquire approximately 800 acres (324 hectares) to construct a USP (approximately 61,654 square meters or 663,638 square feet) and FPC (approximately 6,063 square meters or 65,262 square feet) in Letcher County. The proposed facilities would house approximately 1,216 total inmates: approximately 960 within the USP and approximately 256 within the FPC. Inmates housed in the USP would be high-security male inmates and those housed in the FPC would be minimum-security male inmates. In addition to the USP and FPC, several ancillary facilities necessary for the operation of the USP and FPC would be constructed. The ancillary facilities would include a central utility plant, outdoor firing range, outside warehouse, staff Executive Summary March 2016 ES-i Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky training building, and garage/landscape building. A non-lethal/lethal fence would also be installed around the perimeter of the USP. The non-lethal/lethal fence would be placed between two parallel, chain link and razor wire fences. Operation of the USP and FPC would require approximately 300 full-time staff. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Three alternatives were analyzed in the Revised Final EIS, the No Action Alternative and two build alternatives: Alternative 1 – Payne Gap and Alternative 2 – Roxana. Figure ES-1 depicts the locations of Alternatives 1 and 2. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative does not meet the project purpose and need; however, it represents the existing conditions and is analyzed in the Revised Final EIS as a baseline for comparing the proposed action. The purpose for this comparison is to allow the federal agency to assess the effects of taking no action versus implementing the proposed action. In some cases the No Action Alternative would result in impacts to certain resources if the proposed action is not implemented. Therefore, the assessment of the No Action Alternative is an important component of all NEPA documents. Alternative 1 – Payne Gap Under Alternative 1, the Bureau would acquire approximately 753 acres (305 hectares) of land known as the Payne Gap site. The site is located in eastern Letcher County, approximately 7 miles northeast of Whitesburg, along the Kentucky and Virginia border. Alternative 1 would require extensive earthwork to prepare the site for development. Approximately 8,342,922 cubic meters (10,912,130 cubic yards) of excavation and 10,568,450 cubic meters (13,823,012 cubic yards) of fill would be required prior to the beginning of construction activities. Alternative 2 – Roxana Under Alternative 2, the Bureau would acquire approximately 700 acres (283 hectares) of land known as the Roxana site. The site is located 7.5 miles west of Whitesburg, Kentucky. Alternative 2 would also require extensive earthwork to prepare the site for development. Approximately 7,766,032 cubic meters (10,157,586 cubic yards) of material would need to be excavated from the site and approximately 7,188,790 cubic meters (9,402,582 cubic yards) of fill would be required to prepare the site for construction activities. PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Alternative 2 – Roxana is the preferred alternative because it best meets the project needs and would have fewer impacts to the human environment. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The Bureau published a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS on July 26, 2013. The Bureau held a 30-day scoping period between July 26 and August 26, 2013. A public scoping meeting was held during the scoping period. The meeting was held on August 13, 2013, to inform the public about the proposed project and to explain NEPA and the associated environmental impact analysis. A total of 453 community ES-ii Executive Summary March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure ES-1. Payne Gap and Roxana Site Locations Executive Summary March 2016 ES-iii Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) ES-iv Executive Summary March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky members attended the public meeting and a total of 320 comments were received during the 30-day scoping period. Additionally, 169 letters of support were presented at the scoping meeting, as well as two petitions in support of the project with a combined total of 124 signatures. Of the 320 comments received, 317 comments were in support of the project and 3 were not in support of the project. Issues raised in the letters that did not support the project included: socioeconomics, previous mining activities, infrastructure, and alternatives. These resources and areas of concern were analyzed in the Draft EIS. The Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS was published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2015. A Notice of Public Meeting for the Draft EIS was published in the Federal Register on February 10, 2015. A notice of availability of the Draft EIS and public meeting was also published in the Mountain Eagle on February 11, 2015 and the Lexington Herald-Leader on February 8, 2015. The notice announced that the Draft EIS would be available for public review and comment between February 13 and March 30, 2015. The notice identified the local libraries where hard copies of the document could be reviewed, as well as a project website, www.fbopletchercountyeis.com, where an electronic version of the document could be reviewed. The public meeting was held on March 12, 2015, between 5:30 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Approximately 350 members of the public attended the public meeting. Comments received during the public comment period included 158 comments received at the public meeting; 31 comments received via mail or email; three petitions in support of the project with 1,001 signatures, one petition in support of the project at the Roxana site with 155 signatures, and 1,005 letters of support. Of the comments received, 1,157 of the comments (not including the petitions in support of the project) were in support of the project and 12 comments were in opposition of the project. Twenty-four of the comments in support of the project favored the Payne Gap site and 44 of the comments in support of the project favored the Roxana site. All comments on the Draft EIS, as well as the Bureau’s responses to those comments, are provided in Appendix E-1 of this Revised Final EIS. The Notice of Availability of the Final EIS was published in the Federal Register on July 31, 2015, beginning a 30-day public review period. The notice was also published in the Mountain Eagle on July 22, 2015, and the Lexington Herald-Leader on July 26, 2015. A total of 16 comments and one online petition signed by 625 individuals in opposition of the project were received during the 30-day review period, and two comments were received after the 30-day review period. In consideration of comments received following release of the Final EIS, the Bureau concluded that written notice of publication of the Final EIS had not been directly provided to at least 22 parties who had requested it; consequently, those parties received less than the intended, full 30-day review period in which to submit comments on the Final EIS. By publishing this Revised Final EIS and providing a 30-day review period, the public, including any parties who may not have received timely notice of the Final EIS publication, are being afforded a new 30-day review period within which to submit comments on the Revised Final EIS so that they can be considered by the Bureau prior to issuing a Record of Decision for the proposed action. All comments received on the withdrawn Final EIS will remain part of the Administrative Record for the proposed action, and have been included in this Revised Final EIS in Appendix E-2. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS Table ES-1 provides a summary of the potential environmental effects from the No Action Alternative and the two build alternatives: Alternative 1 – Payne Gap and Alternative 2 – Roxana. Potential mitigation and site preparation costs have also been provided in this table. These mitigation measures and Executive Summary March 2016 ES-v Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky costs are likely to change over the course of the project as a result of coordination with various agencies and formal development of mitigation measures with the agencies; however, this was the best available information at the time this EIS was published and serves to assist in the comparison of the alternatives. Table ES-1. Summary of Environmental Consequences Alternative 1 (Payne Gap) Alternative 2 (Roxana) • Compatibility issues with adjacent properties • Significant impacts to topography, geology, and soils • No significant adverse effects • Potential beneficial economic effects • Compatibility issues with adjacent properties • Significant impacts to topography, geology, and soils • No significant adverse effects • Potential beneficial economic effects • No adverse impacts • No adverse impacts • No impact Transportation and Traffic • No adverse impacts to traffic and roadways • Minor roadway improvements would be required • No adverse impacts to traffic; however, there would be potential adverse impacts to roadways • Roadway improvements would be required • No impacts to traffic Air Quality • No significant impacts on the local or regional air quality • No significant impacts on the local or regional air quality Noise • Short-term, temporary construction related impacts • Short-term, temporary construction related impacts Infrastructure and Utilities • Significant impacts to wastewater and natural gas infrastructure • No significant direct impacts • Cumulative impacts to wastewater infrastructure Cultural Resources • No adverse impacts • No adverse impacts • 2.40 acres (0.97 hectares) of wetland impacts • 10,512 linear feet of stream impacts • 218 acres (88 hectares) of deforestation • Impacts to Indiana, northern long-eared, and gray bat habitat • 2.45 acres (1.0 hectares) of wetland impacts • 4,117 linear feet of stream impacts • 93 acres (38 hectares) of deforestation • Impacts to Indiana and northern long-eared bat habitat • No adverse impacts • No adverse impacts Resource Area Land Use and Zoning Topography, Geology, and Soils Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice Community Facilities and Services Water Resources Biological Resources Hazardous Materials and Waste Known Mitigation and Associated Costs Infrastructure and $8,895,000 Utilities Threatened and $1,030,000 -$1,373,400 Endangered Species* Excavation and $217,327,748 Grading Costs No Action Alternative • No compatibility issues • No impacts to topography, geology, and soils • Opportunity for beneficial economic effects would not exist • No increases in air emissions; therefore, no impacts to air quality • No construction or operation of a new facility; therefore, no impacts from increases in noise • No construction or operation of a new facility; therefore, no increase in demand on infrastructure and utilities • No construction or operation of a new facility; therefore, no impacts to cultural resources • No construction or operation of a new facility; therefore, no impacts to water resources • No construction or operation of a new facility; therefore, no impacts to biological resources. • No impacts $15,825,000 No Cost $732,375-$1,024,355 No Mitigation $141,116,447 No Cost Notes: *Estimated costs are based on United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) cost per acre for impacts to Indiana bat and northern long-eared bat habitat for Payne Gap and Swarming P1/P2 habitat for Roxana. Cost was calculated based on total forest impacts for each site and time of year habitat is removed. Cost is based only on summer habitat impacts. ES-vi Executive Summary March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................ES-i 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION .......................................................................1-1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Security Levels ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Existing Federal Prison Population .............................................................................................. 1-2 Federal Bureau of Prisons Mid-Atlantic Region ......................................................................... 1-3 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................... 1-4 Proposed Action .............................................................................................................................. 1-4 General Design Features of the United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp ..................................................................................................... 1-5 Environmental Review Process ..................................................................................................... 1-5 National Environmental Policy Act .............................................................................. 1-5 Related Environmental Documents .............................................................................. 1-6 Agency Coordination...................................................................................................... 1-6 Public Involvement ......................................................................................................... 1-6 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ..........................................................................................................................................2-1 No Action Alternative..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Alternative Locations-Nationwide ................................................................................................ 2-2 Alternatives Development .............................................................................................................. 2-3 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap ............................................................................................................. 2-5 Alternative 2 – Roxana ................................................................................................................... 2-8 Preferred Alternative ..................................................................................................................... 2-8 3.0 DEFINITION OF RESOURCE....................................................................................................................3-1 Land Use and Zoning ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 Topography, Geology, and Soils .................................................................................................... 3-1 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice ................................................................................. 3-1 Community Facilities and Services ............................................................................................... 3-2 Transportation and Traffic............................................................................................................ 3-3 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 3-3 Noise................................................................................................................................................. 3-5 Infrastructure and Utilities ............................................................................................................ 3-5 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................................................... 3-6 Water Resources ............................................................................................................................. 3-7 Surface Water ................................................................................................................. 3-7 Wetlands .......................................................................................................................... 3-8 Groundwater ................................................................................................................... 3-8 Floodplains ...................................................................................................................... 3-9 Biological Resources ....................................................................................................................... 3-9 Hazardous Materials and Waste ................................................................................................. 3-10 Hazardous Materials .................................................................................................... 3-10 Hazardous Waste .......................................................................................................... 3-10 Toxic Substances ........................................................................................................... 3-10 Cumulative Impact Analysis........................................................................................................ 3-10 Assessing Significance .................................................................................................................. 3-11 4.0 ALTERNATIVE 1 – PAYNE GAP ..............................................................................................................4-1 Land Use and Zoning ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 4-1 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2.1 Construction ..................................................................................................... 4-1 Table of Contents March 2016 i Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4.1.2.2 Operations ........................................................................................................ 4-1 No Action Alternative..................................................................................................... 4-1 Mitigation ........................................................................................................................ 4-3 Topography, Geology, and Soils .................................................................................................... 4-3 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 4-3 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.2.1 Construction ..................................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.2.2 Operations ........................................................................................................ 4-4 No Action Alternative..................................................................................................... 4-4 Mitigation ........................................................................................................................ 4-4 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice ................................................................................. 4-4 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 4-5 4.3.1.1 Population......................................................................................................... 4-5 4.3.1.2 Employment and Income .................................................................................. 4-5 4.3.1.3 Housing ............................................................................................................ 4-7 4.3.1.4 Environmental Justice ...................................................................................... 4-7 4.3.1.5 Protection of Children ...................................................................................... 4-8 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................... 4-8 4.3.2.1 Population......................................................................................................... 4-8 4.3.2.2 Employment and Income .................................................................................. 4-9 4.3.2.3 Housing ............................................................................................................ 4-9 4.3.2.4 Environmental Justice ...................................................................................... 4-9 4.3.2.5 Protection of Children .................................................................................... 4-10 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-10 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-10 Community Facilities and Services ............................................................................................. 4-10 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 4-10 4.4.1.1 Police .............................................................................................................. 4-10 4.4.1.2 Fire ................................................................................................................. 4-10 4.4.1.3 Health Care ..................................................................................................... 4-11 4.4.1.4 Schools ........................................................................................................... 4-11 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 4-12 4.4.2.1 Police .............................................................................................................. 4-12 4.4.2.2 Fire ................................................................................................................. 4-12 4.4.2.3 Health Care ..................................................................................................... 4-12 4.4.2.4 Schools ........................................................................................................... 4-13 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-13 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-13 Transportation and Traffic.......................................................................................................... 4-13 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 4-13 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 4-14 4.5.2.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 4-14 4.5.2.2 Operations ...................................................................................................... 4-14 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-15 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-15 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................... 4-15 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 4-16 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 4-17 4.6.2.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 4-17 4.6.2.2 Operations ...................................................................................................... 4-17 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-18 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-18 Noise............................................................................................................................................... 4-18 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 4-18 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 4-19 4.7.2.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 4-19 ii Table of Contents March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4.7.2.2 Operations ...................................................................................................... 4-21 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-21 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-21 Infrastructure and Utilities .......................................................................................................... 4-21 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 4-21 4.8.1.1 Potable Water ................................................................................................. 4-21 4.8.1.2 Wastewater ..................................................................................................... 4-22 4.8.1.3 Natural Gas ..................................................................................................... 4-22 4.8.1.4 Electricity ....................................................................................................... 4-22 4.8.1.5 Telecommunications....................................................................................... 4-22 4.8.1.6 Solid Waste..................................................................................................... 4-22 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 4-22 4.8.2.1 Potable Water ................................................................................................. 4-22 4.8.2.2 Wastewater ..................................................................................................... 4-24 4.8.2.3 Natural Gas ..................................................................................................... 4-24 4.8.2.4 Electricity ....................................................................................................... 4-24 4.8.2.5 Telecommunications....................................................................................... 4-24 4.8.2.6 Solid Waste..................................................................................................... 4-24 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-25 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-25 Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 4-25 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 4-25 4.9.1.1 Archaeological Resources .............................................................................. 4-25 4.9.1.2 Traditional Cultural Properties ....................................................................... 4-26 4.9.1.3 Architectural Resources.................................................................................. 4-26 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 4-28 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-28 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-28 Water Resources ........................................................................................................................... 4-28 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 4-28 4.10.1.1 Surface Water ................................................................................................. 4-28 4.10.1.2 Wetlands ......................................................................................................... 4-29 4.10.1.3 Groundwater ................................................................................................... 4-31 4.10.1.4 Floodplains ..................................................................................................... 4-31 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 4-31 4.10.2.1 Surface Water ................................................................................................. 4-31 4.10.2.2 Wetlands ......................................................................................................... 4-31 4.10.2.3 Groundwater ................................................................................................... 4-32 4.10.2.4 Floodplains ..................................................................................................... 4-32 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-32 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-32 Biological Resources ..................................................................................................................... 4-32 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 4-32 4.11.1.1 Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 4-32 4.11.1.2 Wildlife........................................................................................................... 4-32 4.11.1.3 Threatened and Endangered Species .............................................................. 4-33 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 4-36 4.11.2.1 Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 4-36 4.11.2.2 Wildlife........................................................................................................... 4-36 4.11.2.3 Threatened and Endangered Species .............................................................. 4-36 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-37 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-37 Hazardous Materials and Waste ................................................................................................. 4-38 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 4-38 4.12.1.1 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................... 4-38 4.12.1.2 Hazardous Wastes .......................................................................................... 4-39 Table of Contents March 2016 iii Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4.12.1.3 Toxic Substances ............................................................................................ 4-39 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 4-40 4.12.2.1 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................... 4-40 4.12.2.2 Hazardous Wastes .......................................................................................... 4-40 4.12.2.3 Toxic Substances ............................................................................................ 4-41 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 4-41 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 4-41 5.0 iv ALTERNATIVE 2 – ROXANA....................................................................................................................5-1 Land Use and Zoning ..................................................................................................................... 5-1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 5-1 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.2.1 Construction ..................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.2.2 Operations ........................................................................................................ 5-1 No Action Alternative..................................................................................................... 5-1 Mitigation ........................................................................................................................ 5-1 Topography, Geology, and Soils .................................................................................................... 5-3 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 5-3 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.2.1 Construction ..................................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.2.2 Operations ........................................................................................................ 5-4 No Action Alternative..................................................................................................... 5-4 Mitigation ........................................................................................................................ 5-4 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice ................................................................................. 5-4 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 5-4 5.3.1.1 Population......................................................................................................... 5-4 5.3.1.2 Employment and Income .................................................................................. 5-5 5.3.1.3 Housing ............................................................................................................ 5-7 5.3.1.4 Environmental Justice ...................................................................................... 5-7 5.3.1.5 Protection of Children ...................................................................................... 5-8 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................... 5-8 5.3.2.1 Population......................................................................................................... 5-8 5.3.2.2 Employment and Income .................................................................................. 5-9 5.3.2.3 Housing ............................................................................................................ 5-9 5.3.2.4 Environmental Justice ...................................................................................... 5-9 5.3.2.5 Protection of Children .................................................................................... 5-10 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-10 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-10 Community Facilities and Services ............................................................................................. 5-10 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 5-10 5.4.1.1 Police .............................................................................................................. 5-10 5.4.1.2 Fire ................................................................................................................. 5-10 5.4.1.3 Health Care ..................................................................................................... 5-11 5.4.1.4 Schools ........................................................................................................... 5-11 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 5-11 5.4.2.1 Police .............................................................................................................. 5-11 5.4.2.2 Fire ................................................................................................................. 5-12 5.4.2.3 Health Care ..................................................................................................... 5-12 5.4.2.4 Schools ........................................................................................................... 5-12 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-13 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-13 Transportation and Traffic.......................................................................................................... 5-13 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 5-13 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 5-13 5.5.2.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 5-14 5.5.2.2 Operations ...................................................................................................... 5-14 Table of Contents March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-14 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-14 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................... 5-15 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 5-15 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 5-15 5.6.2.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 5-15 5.6.2.2 Operations ...................................................................................................... 5-15 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-16 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-16 Noise............................................................................................................................................... 5-16 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 5-16 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 5-17 5.7.2.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 5-17 5.7.2.2 Operations ...................................................................................................... 5-18 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-18 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-18 Infrastructure and Utilities .......................................................................................................... 5-19 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 5-19 5.8.1.1 Potable Water ................................................................................................. 5-19 5.8.1.2 Wastewater ..................................................................................................... 5-19 5.8.1.3 Natural Gas ..................................................................................................... 5-19 5.8.1.4 Electricity ....................................................................................................... 5-19 5.8.1.5 Telecommunications....................................................................................... 5-21 5.8.1.6 Solid Waste..................................................................................................... 5-21 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 5-21 5.8.2.1 Potable Water ................................................................................................. 5-21 5.8.2.2 Wastewater ..................................................................................................... 5-21 5.8.2.3 Natural Gas ..................................................................................................... 5-21 5.8.2.4 Electricity ....................................................................................................... 5-22 5.8.2.5 Telecommunications....................................................................................... 5-22 5.8.2.6 Solid Waste..................................................................................................... 5-22 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-22 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-22 Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 5-22 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 5-23 5.9.1.1 Archaeological Resources .............................................................................. 5-23 5.9.1.2 Traditional Cultural Properties ....................................................................... 5-23 5.9.1.3 Architectural Resources.................................................................................. 5-23 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 5-23 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-23 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-23 Water Resources ........................................................................................................................... 5-25 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 5-25 5.10.1.1 Surface Water ................................................................................................. 5-25 5.10.1.2 Wetlands ......................................................................................................... 5-26 5.10.1.3 Groundwater ................................................................................................... 5-27 5.10.1.4 Floodplains ..................................................................................................... 5-29 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 5-29 5.10.2.1 Surface Water ................................................................................................. 5-29 5.10.2.2 Wetlands ......................................................................................................... 5-29 5.10.2.3 Groundwater ................................................................................................... 5-29 5.10.2.4 Floodplains ..................................................................................................... 5-30 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-30 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-30 Biological Resources ..................................................................................................................... 5-31 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 5-31 Table of Contents March 2016 v Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 5.11.1.1 Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 5-31 5.11.1.2 Wildlife........................................................................................................... 5-31 5.11.1.3 Threatened and Endangered Species .............................................................. 5-31 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 5-34 5.11.2.1 Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 5-34 5.11.2.2 Wildlife........................................................................................................... 5-34 5.11.2.3 Threatened and Endangered Species .............................................................. 5-35 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-35 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-35 Hazardous Materials and Waste ................................................................................................. 5-36 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 5-36 5.12.1.1 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................... 5-36 5.12.1.2 Hazardous Wastes .......................................................................................... 5-39 5.12.1.3 Toxic Substances ............................................................................................ 5-40 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 5-40 5.12.2.1 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................... 5-40 5.12.2.2 Hazardous Wastes .......................................................................................... 5-41 5.12.2.3 Toxic Substances ............................................................................................ 5-42 No Action Alternative................................................................................................... 5-42 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 5-42 6.0 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHORT-TERM USE OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY ..........................................................................................................................6-1 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES ...............................7-1 8.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ..........................................................................................................................8-1 Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ....................................................... 8-1 Gateway Regional Business Park .................................................................................. 8-1 Letcher County Airport Project .................................................................................... 8-1 Infrastructure and Utility Projects ............................................................................... 8-2 Proposed Action .............................................................................................................. 8-2 Potential Cumulative Impacts ....................................................................................... 8-5 8.1.5.1 Land Use .......................................................................................................... 8-5 8.1.5.2 Topography, Geology, and Soils ...................................................................... 8-5 8.1.5.3 Traffic and Transportation ................................................................................ 8-5 8.1.5.4 Air Quality........................................................................................................ 8-6 8.1.5.5 Noise................................................................................................................. 8-6 8.1.5.6 Infrastructure and Utilities ................................................................................ 8-6 8.1.5.7 Water Resources ............................................................................................... 8-7 8.1.5.8 Biological Resources ........................................................................................ 8-7 9.0 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................................9-1 10.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ...............................................................................................................................10-1 11.0 DISTRIBUTION LIST ................................................................................................................................11-1 APPENDIX A AGENCY COORDINATION .......................................................................................................A-1 APPENDIX B EXCAVATION AND GRADING CALCULATIONS ................................................................ B-1 APPENDIX C AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS ..........................................................................................C-1 APPENDIX D ENHANCED UTILITY REPORT................................................................................................D-1 vi Table of Contents March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX E-1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIS ................................................................. E1-1 APPENDIX E-2 COMMENTS ON FINAL EIS ................................................................................................. E2-1 APPENDIX F TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ......................................................................................................... F-1 APPENDIX G ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS ............................................................................. G-1 APPENDIX H INVESTIGATION OF ROCK RUBBLE MATERIAL, ROXANA SITE ............................... H-1 List of Figures Figure ES-1. Payne Gap and Roxana Site Locations ........................................................................................ ES-iii Figure 2-1. Payne Gap and Roxana Site Locations................................................................................................2-4 Figure 2-2. Payne Gap Project Location.................................................................................................................2-6 Figure 2-3. Payne Gap USP and FPC Conceptual Layout ....................................................................................2-7 Figure 2-4. Roxana Project Location ......................................................................................................................2-9 Figure 2-5. Roxana USP and FPC Conceptual Layout .......................................................................................2-10 Figure 4-1. Payne Gap Land Use.............................................................................................................................4-2 Figure 4-2. Payne Gap Existing Utilities ...............................................................................................................4-23 Figure 4-3. Architectural Resources Evaluated in the APE for Alternative 1 ..................................................4-27 Figure 4-4. Payne Gap Wetlands and Streams ....................................................................................................4-30 Figure 5-1. Roxana Land Use ..................................................................................................................................5-2 Figure 5-2. Roxana Existing Utilities ....................................................................................................................5-20 Figure 5-3. Architectural Resources Evaluated in the APE for Alternative 2 ..................................................5-24 Figure 5-4. Roxana Wetlands and Streams ..........................................................................................................5-28 List of Tables Table ES-1. Summary of Environmental Consequences ...................................................................................ES-vi Table 1-1. Mid-Atlantic Region USP Inmate Population as of December 3, 2015 ..............................................1-4 Table 2-1. Estimated Site Preparation Quantities for Alternative 1 - Payne Gap ..............................................2-5 Table 2-2. Estimated Site Preparation Quantities for Alternative 2 - Roxana ....................................................2-8 Table 3-1. Ambient Air Quality Standards ............................................................................................................3-4 Table 3-2. Sound Levels Estimated by Population Density ...................................................................................3-5 Table 4-1. Study Area Population Trends, 2000–2010 ...........................................................................................4-5 Table 4-2. Study Area Employment, 2013 ..............................................................................................................4-6 Table 4-3. Study Area Percent Unemployment Rates ...........................................................................................4-6 Table 4-4. Study Area Personal and Per Capita Income .......................................................................................4-7 Table 4-5. Study Area Housing Units, 2013 ............................................................................................................4-7 Table 4-6. Study Area Percent Race and Ethnicity, 2013 .....................................................................................4-8 Table 4-7. Study Area Percent Below Poverty Level, 2013 ...................................................................................4-8 Table 4-8. Study Area Percent Under the Age of 18, 2013 ....................................................................................4-8 Table 4-9. Letcher County Schools Enrollment and Capacity for 2014–2015...................................................4-12 Table of Contents March 2016 vii Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 4-10. Estimated Peak Hour Trip Generation.............................................................................................4-14 Table 4-11. Construction Emission Estimates for Payne Gap Site .....................................................................4-17 Table 4-12. Estimated Annual Operational Emissions ........................................................................................4-18 Table 4-13. OSHA Permissible Noise Exposures .................................................................................................4-19 Table 4-14. Airborne Construction Related Noise Emissions .............................................................................4-20 Table 4-15. Architectural Resources in the Payne Gap Site APE Evaluated for NRHP Eligibility ......................................................................................................................................4-28 Table 4-16. Wetland and Streams Delineated at Payne Gap ..............................................................................4-29 Table 4-17. State and Federal Report of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Plants, and Animals of Letcher County, Kentucky ..................................................................4-33 Table 5-1. Study Area Population Trends, 2000–2010 ...........................................................................................5-5 Table 5-2. Study Area Employment, 2013 ..............................................................................................................5-6 Table 5-3. Study Area Percent Unemployment Rates ...........................................................................................5-6 Table 5-4. Study Area Personal and Per Capita Income .......................................................................................5-7 Table 5-5. Study Area Housing Units, 2013 ............................................................................................................5-7 Table 5-6. Study Area Percent Race and Ethnicity, 2013 .....................................................................................5-8 Table 5-7. Study Area Percent Below Poverty Level, 2013 ...................................................................................5-8 Table 5-8. Study Area Percent Under the Age of 18, 2013 ....................................................................................5-8 Table 5-9. Letcher County Schools Enrollment and Capacity for 2014–2015...................................................5-11 Table 5-10. Estimated Peak Hour Trip Generation.............................................................................................5-14 Table 5-11. Construction Emission Estimates for Roxana Site ..........................................................................5-15 Table 5-12. Estimated Annual Operational Emissions ........................................................................................5-16 Table 5-13. Airborne Construction Related Noise Emissions .............................................................................5-18 Table 5-14. Architectural Resources in the Roxana Site APE Evaluated for NRHP Eligibility ......................................................................................................................................5-23 Table 5-15. Wetland and Streams Delineated at Roxana ....................................................................................5-27 Table 5-16. State and Federal Report of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Plants, and Animals of Letcher County, Kentucky ..................................................................5-32 Table 5-17. Generic Statewide Ambient Background Concentrations for Arsenic ..........................................5-38 Table 8-1. Estimated GHG Emissions from Construction Activities at Payne Gap Site ....................................8-4 Table 8-2. Estimated GHG Emissions from Construction Activities at Roxana Site .........................................8-4 viii Table of Contents March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AEP American Electric Power AMSL above mean sea level AMUs Adjusted Mitigation Unit(s) APE Area of Potential Effects ARH Appalachian Regional Healthcare AST(s) aboveground storage tank(s) ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials BMPs Best Management Practices Bureau Federal Bureau of Prisons CAA CCR(s) CEQ CERCLIS Clean Air Act Consumer Confidence Report(s) Council on Environmental Quality Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CFR Code of Federal Regulations CH4 methane CMOA Conservation Memorandum of Agreement CO carbon monoxide CO2 HAP(s) hazardous air pollutant(s) HUC Hydrologic Unit Code ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers KAR Kentucky Administrative Regulations KDEP Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection KGS Kentucky Geological Survey KHC Kentucky Heritage Council KRADD Kentucky River Area Development District KY SHWS KYLMI KYTC LOS LCWSD MBTA MOU MSAT(s) MSL NAAQS Kentucky State Hazardous Waste Sites Kentucky Labor Market Information Kentucky Transportation Cabinet level of service Letcher County Water and Sewer District Migratory Bird Treaty Act Memorandum of Understanding Mobile Source Air Toxic(s) mean sea level National Ambient Air Quality Standards carbon dioxide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent NHPA National Historic Preservation Act CWA Clean Water Act N2O nitrogen oxide decibels NO2 nitrogen dioxide A-weighted decibels NOx nitrogen oxides dB dBA EA Environmental Assessment NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service EIS Environmental Impact Statement NRHP National Register of Historic Places EIU Ecological Integrity Unit EMTs emergency medical technicians EO Executive Order ESA Endangered Species Act FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FPC Federal Prison Camp FPPA Farmland Protection Policy Act GHGs greenhouse gases Acronyms and Abbreviations March 2016 NWI O3 OSHA National Wetland Inventory ozone Occupational Safety and Health Administration PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls pCi/L picocuries per liter PM2.5 particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less PM10 particulate matter with a diameter less than 10 microns ix Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky ppb parts per billion ppm parts per million RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RECs Recognized Environmental Conditions RSLs Regional Screening Levels SHPO SO2 TCPs TMDL State Historic Preservation Officer sulphur dioxide Traditional Cultural Properties Total Maximum Daily Load TPY tons per year TRI Toxics Release Inventory TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act UCL Upper Confidence Limit U.S. United States USACE USC USDA U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Code U.S. Department of Agriculture USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS USP UST(s) VOC WWTP yd3 U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Penitentiary underground storage tank(s) volatile organic compound wastewater treatment plant cubic yards µg/kg micrograms per kilogram µg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter µS x microseconds Acronyms and Abbreviations March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION The United States (U.S.) Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) has prepared this Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed construction and operation of a federal correctional facility in Letcher County, Kentucky. The Bureau published the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Letcher County, Kentucky on July 31, 2015. In consideration of comments received following publication of the Final EIS and to correct inconsistencies in the Final EIS, the Bureau concluded the Final EIS would be withdrawn and a Revised Final EIS would be issued. A Revised Final EIS would enable the Bureau to provide more complete discussion of some topics addressed in the Final EIS, and provide more complete responses to comments received on the Draft EIS than were provided in the FEIS. Also as a result of comments received following release of the Final EIS, the Bureau concluded that written notice of availability of the Final EIS had not been directly provided to at least 22 parties who had requested it; therefore, those parties received less than the intended, full 30-day review period in which to submit comments on the Final EIS. By publishing this Revised Final EIS and by providing a 30-day review period on the Revised Final EIS, the public, including any parties who may not have received timely notice of the Final EIS publication, are being afforded a new 30-day review period within which to submit comments on the Revised Final EIS so that they can be considered by the Bureau prior to and in connection with a Record of Decision for the proposed action. This Revised Final EIS makes no change to the proposed action. As did the withdrawn Final EIS, the Revised Final EIS evaluates potential environmental effects that may result from the proposed construction and operation of a United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp at two alternative sites in Letcher County, Kentucky, as well as the No Action Alternative. This EIS has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500–1508), and the U.S. Department of Justice procedures for implementing NEPA (28 CFR 61). BACKGROUND The Bureau was established in 1930 to provide more progressive and humane care for federal inmates, to professionalize the prison service, and to ensure consistent and centralized administration of federal prisons. The mission of the Bureau is to protect society by confining offenders in the controlled environments of prisons and community-based facilities that are safe, humane, cost efficient, and appropriately secure, and that provide work and other self-improvement opportunities to assist offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens. SECURITY LEVELS The Bureau accomplishes its mission through the appropriate use of the following types of communitycorrection, detention, and correctional facilities: • • • Federally owned and operated Federally owned and non-federally operated Non-federally owned and operated 1.0 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action March 2016 1-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Regardless of facility ownership, the Bureau operates correction and detention facilities at various security levels. Each security level is characterized by the type of housing within the institution, internal security features, and staff-to-inmate ratio. Different security levels require particular features such as external patrols, guard towers, security barriers, or detection devices. The five categories of security levels are described as follows: • • • • • Minimum-Security – Also known as Federal Prison Camps (FPCs) or satellite work camps. They are characterized by dormitory housing, a relatively low staff-to-inmate ratio, and are without fences. They are typically associated with a larger institution or military base where inmates can help serve labor needs of the institution or base. Low-Security – Federal Correctional Institutions with double fenced perimeters, primarily dormitory housing, and strong work and program components. Medium-Security – Federal Correctional Institutions with strengthened perimeters (e.g., double fences with electronic detection systems), cell-type housing, a wide variety of work and treatment programs, and an increased inmate-to-staff ratio to provide greater control. High-Security – Also known as United States Penitentiary (USP). These facilities have highly secure perimeters (e.g., walls or double fences with taut wire fencing, non-lethal/lethal fences), multiple single occupant cell housing, guard towers, close staff supervision, and movement controls. Administrative – Institutions that house offenders who require an uncommon level of security due to their serious records of institutional misconduct, involvement in violent or escape-related behavior, and/or who have unusual security needs based on the nature of their offense. These facilities have highly secured perimeters consisting of walled or double fenced enclosures with guard towers. The security level classifications of all of the Bureau’s inmates are reviewed at regularly scheduled intervals during their incarceration. If at the time of the inmate’s classification review the inmate’s security level is no longer appropriate for placement in the current institution, the inmate would be submitted for transfer to a lower or higher security level facility. The classification of inmates is necessary to place each inmate in the most appropriate security level institution that meets their program needs and also ensures and protects society. EXISTING FEDERAL PRISON POPULATION In 1981, the federal inmate population consisted of approximately 23,800 inmates. By 1986 the federal inmate population had increased to about 38,700, a 63 percent increase. Growth continued at a steady rate through the 1990s and in 1998 the federal inmate population had grown 280 percent, reaching 108,000 inmates. At the end of Fiscal Year 2015 (September 30, 2015), the Bureau inmate population totaled 205,723; this includes 165,134 inmates being housed in 122 Bureau institutions, 24,262 being housed in privately-managed secure facilities, and 16,327 being housed in other contract care. Of the 165,134 inmates housed in Bureau institutions, 21,465 were high-security male inmates. The Bureau housed these 21,465 high-security male inmates in 17 USPs located throughout six regions within the U.S.: the MidAtlantic Region; North Central Region; Northeast Region; South Central Region; Southeast Region; and 1-2 1.0 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Western Region. 1 Each region provides facilities for housing inmates at all security levels. At the end of Fiscal Year 2015, the 17 USPs were rated for a total capacity of 14,621 high-security inmates. Therefore, the Bureau’s high-security institutions were 47 percent overcrowded and continue to operate at above rated capacity. The overall prisoner population is declining. However, of the 8,426 net decrease in the total inmate population in Fiscal Year 2015, only a small fraction of the net decrease was realized in the Bureau’s high-security level inmate population (250). The current prison population in high-security male facilities (USPs) remains at overcrowding levels. As of December 3, 2015, the system-wide overcrowding level for all USPs in the Bureau of Prisons is 46 percent. The overcrowding level in the USPs in the Mid-Atlantic Region is currently 48 percent. To meet the current and projected bedspace needs, the Bureau evaluates the bedspace needs of the regions using a geographically balanced program. When making decisions on the placement of an individual, the Bureau considers the origin of the inmate and attempts to place the inmate in an institution that is within the region of the inmate’s origin. Placing inmates within their region of origin provides greater opportunity for visitation with family, which aids in the rehabilitation process. However, an inmate’s region of origin is not the sole factor in determining the inmate’s placement. Other factors that are considered when making placement decisions include, but are not limited to, the level of security and supervision the inmate requires, the level of security and staff supervision the institution is able to provide, the inmate’s program needs, the level of overcrowding at an institution, any security, location or program recommendation by the sentencing court, any additional security measures to ensure the protection of victims/witnesses and the public in general, and any other factor(s) that may involve the inmate’s confinement, the protection of society, and/or the safe and orderly management of a Bureau facility. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS MID-ATLANTIC REGION One of the regions identified by the Bureau as having an increasing need for additional high-security bedspace in order to reduce overcrowding is the Mid-Atlantic Region. As of December 3, 2015, approximately 5,665 high-security inmates are housed within the Mid-Atlantic Region. The current rated capacity for these institutions is 3,821. Therefore, the Bureau has determined that due to the overcrowding in the Mid-Atlantic Region, specifically within the USPs, construction of a new high-security facility and a FPC for mission support would be warranted in the region. There are currently 18 correctional facilities housing male inmates in the Bureau’s Mid-Atlantic Region. Of these, only four are USPs or high-security facilities: USP Hazelton located in Hazelton, West Virginia, USP Lee located in Jonesville, Virginia, USP Big Sandy located in Inez, Kentucky, and USP McCreary located in McCreary, Kentucky. Table 1-1 depicts the current populations associated with each of the USPs in the Mid-Atlantic Region. Inmates houses at the Administrative Maximum Facility in Florence, Colorado and the Administrative USP in Thomson, Illinois were not included in these figures. 1 1.0 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action March 2016 1-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 1-1. Mid-Atlantic Region USP Inmate Population as of December 3, 2015 Hazelton Lee Big Sandy McCreary USP Total Current Inmate Population 1,445 1,329 1,458 1,433 5,665 Rated Capacity 957 960 949 955 3,821 PURPOSE AND NEED The purpose of the proposed federal correctional facility in Letcher County, Kentucky, is to provide an additional high-security penitentiary and an associated prison camp to increase capacity for current inmate populations in the Mid-Atlantic Region. The need for the proposed facility is that the current inmate populations of the USPs in the Mid-Atlantic Region are exceeding their rated capacity and their associated FPCs are at or near capacity. The overcrowding level in the USPs in the Mid-Atlantic Region is currently 48 percent. Current inmates from the four existing USPs in the Mid-Atlantic Region could be moved from these overcrowded facilities to the proposed Letcher County USP. The Bureau has determined that there is a need for additional high-security facilities within this region to reduce the demonstrated overcrowding that compromises the mission of the Bureau. The Bureau’s mission is to protect society by confining offenders in the controlled environments of prisons and community-based facilities that are safe, humane, cost-efficient, and appropriately secured, and that provide work and other self-improvement opportunities to assist offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens. PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action evaluated in this Revised Final EIS is the acquisition of property and the construction and operation of a federal correctional facility in Letcher County, Kentucky. The Bureau proposes to acquire approximately 800 acres (324 hectares) to construct a USP (approximately 61,654 square meters [663,638 square feet]) and FPC (approximately 6,063 square meters [65,262 square feet]) in Letcher County. Inmates housed in the USP would be high-security male inmates and those housed in the FPC would be minimum-security male inmates. The proposed USP and FPC would house approximately 1,216 total inmates (approximately 960 within the USP and approximately 256 within the FPC). Operation of the USP and FPC would require approximately 300 full-time staff. In addition to the USP and FPC, several ancillary facilities necessary for the operation of the USP and FPC would be constructed. The ancillary facilities would include the following: • • • • • • Central Utility Plant (1,217 square meters [13,100 square feet]) Outdoor Firing Range (96 square meters [1,033 square feet]) Outside Warehouse (3,279 square meters [35,295 square feet]) Staff Training Building (910 square meters [9,795 square feet]) Garage/Landscape Building (653 square meters [7,028 square feet]) Access Roads and Parking The outdoor firing range would be used by Bureau staff primarily for annual firearms recertification. The range would be used approximately once a month for small arms training and maintenance. A non-lethal/lethal fence and lighting would also be installed. The non-lethal/lethal fence would be placed around the perimeter of the USP between two parallel, chain link and razor wire fences. The fence would 1-4 1.0 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky be approximately 12 feet high. The site lighting would consist of 100 foot (30 meter) high-mast lighting poles placed along the security perimeter road around the correctional facility, in the parking lot, and around the buildings. The lighting would include hooded fixtures with a mix of high pressure sodium and metal halide lights to provide a minimum of 1.5 footcandles of illumination. The number and mix of light sources used to illuminate the secure compound are selected for the ability to relight the facility quickly in the event of a power outage. The initial step for project development would be property acquisition. Property acquisition would involve acquisition of both surface and mineral rights from multiple owners, and would be estimated to take several months to a year or longer. Project construction would begin after property acquisition is completed, and would take three to four years. General Design Features of the United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp The Bureau has standard design layouts for their correctional facilities, which include similar design characteristics. General design features of a USP include: • • • • • Single road for controlled access to each correctional facility Parking lot located near the public entrance to each correctional facility for use by both employees and visitors One- to four-story structures Multipurpose activity spaces Buffer areas around the facility providing visual and physical setbacks from the site boundaries ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS National Environmental Policy Act In 1969, Congress enacted the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires consideration of environmental issues in federal agency planning and decision-making. Regulations for federal agency implementation of the act were established by the President’s CEQ. NEPA requires federal agencies to prepare an environmental assessment (EA) or environmental impact statement (EIS) for any federal action, except those actions that are determined to be “categorically excluded” from further analysis. An EIS is prepared for those federal actions that may significantly affect the quality of the human and natural environments or where the impacts are largely unknown or controversial. The EIS must disclose significant environmental impacts and inform decision makers and the public of the reasonable alternatives that would avoid or minimize adverse impacts or enhance the quality of the human environment. The intent of this Revised Final EIS is to document the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed action, acquisition of property and construction and operation of a USP and FPC. The Bureau is the decision-maker with regard to this proposed action. This document, together with its appendices and other documents incorporated by reference, constitutes the Revised Final EIS pursuant to NEPA, the CEQ regulations, and the U.S. Department of Justice procedures for implementing NEPA. The Revised Final EIS identifies and evaluates potential environmental impacts of the proposed action alternatives and the No Action Alternative to: land use and zoning; topography, geology, and soils; socioeconomics and environmental justice; community facilities and services (fire, police, and emergency services, health care facilities, and schools); transportation and traffic; air quality; noise; infrastructure and utilities; cultural resources; water resources (surface water, wetlands, groundwater, and floodplains); biological resources (vegetation, wildlife, and threatened and endangered species); and hazardous 1.0 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action March 2016 1-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky materials and waste. Also discussed, as appropriate, is mitigation for the identified environmental impacts. In addition, this Revised Final EIS identifies which of the proposed action alternatives would result in the least amount of impacts to the environment. Related Environmental Documents In 2008, the Bureau conducted a site reconnaissance study in Letcher County, Kentucky. The site reconnaissance report identified several resources associated with potential sites that would require additional studies to determine if the sites were viable for the development of a federal correctional institution. Based on this 2008 study, a second study was conducted in 2010 to rank these sites and verify that the issues originally identified in 2008 had not changed. Based on the data collected from both the 2008 and 2010 studies, it was determined that a feasibility study to analyze the resources of concern would be conducted to further assess the viability of construction at each of the sites. In 2012, the Bureau completed a feasibility study that evaluated four potential sites for the development of a USP and FPC in Letcher County, Kentucky (TEC, Inc. 2012). The purpose of the feasibility study was to conduct additional studies, including wetland identification and delineation, cultural resource surveys, geotechnical studies, boundary surveys, and a utility assessment, of the proposed sites to determine if there would be constraints associated with these resources and the development of the sites. The feasibility study evaluated the benefits, challenges, and potential risks associated with development of each site. Based on the results of the feasibility study and changes with the offers of sites, it was determined that two sites, Payne Gap and Roxana, would be carried forward for analysis in the EIS. Agency Coordination In addition to NEPA, other laws, regulations, permits and licenses may be applicable to the proposed action. Specifically, the proposed action may require: • • • • • Informal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) Service regarding the occurrence of threatened and endangered species within the sites; Concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Officer on cultural resource findings; Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 permit if wetland impacts occur; National Pollutant Discharge Elimination permit for non-point source discharge; and Erosion and sediment control plan for new construction. Public Involvement NEPA requires the public be informed and involved throughout the development of an EIS, beginning with public scoping. The public scoping meeting is an opportunity for the federal agency, in this case the Bureau, to introduce the project to the public and receive input on the scope of the issues to be addressed in the EIS. The local public has knowledge of the area where the proposed action may take place, and can provide insight into local resources, as well as to the concerns of the community. Public involvement in the NEPA process is required and is an extremely valuable tool in the successful completion of NEPA documents. The official scoping period for this project began on July, 26, 2013, when the Bureau published a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS in the Federal Register, and ended on August 26, 2013. The notice was also published in the Lexington Herald-Leader on July 26, 2013, and the Mountain Eagle on July 31, 2013. A scoping meeting was held on August 13, 2013, to inform the public about the proposed project and to 1-6 1.0 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky explain NEPA and the associated environmental impact analysis. A total of 453 people attended the public meeting and a total of 320 comments were received during the 30-day scoping period. Additionally, 169 letters of support were presented at the scoping meeting, as well as two petitions in support of the project with a combined total of 124 signatures. Of the 320 comments received, 317 comments were in support of the project and 3 were not in support of the project. Issues raised in the letters that did not support the project included: socioeconomics, previous mining activities, infrastructure, and alternatives. These resources and areas of concern raised during scoping were analyzed in the Draft EIS. The Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS was published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2015. A Notice of Public Meeting for the Draft EIS was published in the Federal Register on February 10, 2015. The notice provided the date, time, and location of the public meeting to be held on March 12, 2015. A notice of availability of the Draft EIS and public meeting was also published in the Mountain Eagle on February 11, 2015 and the Lexington Herald-Leader on February 8, 2015. The notice announced that the Draft EIS would be available for public review and comment between February 13 and March 30, 2015. The notice identified the local libraries where hard copies of the document could be reviewed, as well as a project website, www.fbopletchercountyeis.com, where an electronic version of the document could be reviewed. The Bureau also sent out 60 hard copies and 161 CDs containing the Draft EIS to federal, state, and local elected officials and regulatory agencies (USFWS, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Kentucky State Clearinghouse, etc.), other interested parties (planning commission, fire departments, police departments, etc.), and individuals who had requested a copy during scoping or at any other time prior to the release of the Draft EIS. The public meeting was held on March 12, 2015, between 5:30 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. at the Letcher County Central High School. The meeting was conducted in an open house format and Bureau representatives were in attendance to answer questions and discuss the project with the attendees. Approximately 350 members of the public attended the public meeting. Attendees were able to provide written comments or give oral comments to a stenographer during the meeting. Attendees were also provided information for mailing their comments to the Bureau. Comments received during the public comment period included 158 comments received at the public meeting; 31 comments received via mail or email; three petitions in support of the project with 1,001 signatures; one petition in support of the project at the Roxana site with 155 signatures; and 1,005 letters of support. Of the comments received, 1,157 of the comments (not including the petitions in support of the project) were in support of the project and 12 comments were in opposition of the project. Twenty-four of the comments in support of the project favored the Payne Gap site and 44 of the comments in support of the project favored the Roxana site. All comments on the Draft EIS, and the Bureau’s responses to those comments, are included in Appendix E-1 of this Revised Final EIS. The Notice of Availability of the Final EIS was published in the Federal Register on July 31, 2015, beginning a 30-day public review period. The notice was also published in the Mountain Eagle on July 22, 2015, and the Lexington Herald-Leader on July 26, 2015. A total of 16 comments and one online petition signed by 625 individuals in opposition of the project were received during the 30-day review period, and two comments were received after the 30-day review period. In consideration of comments received following release of the Final EIS, the Bureau concluded that written notice of publication of the Final EIS had not been directly provided to at least 22 parties who had requested it; consequently, those parties received less than the intended, full 30-day review period in which to submit comments on the 1.0 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action March 2016 1-7 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Final EIS. By publishing this Revised Final EIS and by providing a 30-day review period on the Revised Final EIS, the public, including any parties who may not have received timely notice of the Final EIS publication, are being afforded a new 30-day review period within which to submit comments on the Revised Final EIS so that they can be considered by the Bureau prior to and in connection with a Record of Decision for the proposed action. All comments received on the Final EIS that was withdrawn will remain part of the Administrative Record for the proposed action, and have been included in this Revised Final EIS in Appendix E-2. 1-8 1.0 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2.0 ALTERNATIVES CEQ’s guidelines for implementing the procedural Provisions of the NEPA establish a number of policies for federal agencies, including “…using the NEPA process to identify and assess reasonable alternatives to the proposed action that will avoid or minimize adverse effects of these actions on the quality of the human environment” (40 CFR 1500.2[e]). The guidelines also require an analysis of alternatives based “on the information and analysis presented in the sections on the Affected Environment (§1502.15) and the Environmental Consequences (§1502.16).” The guidelines further state that the analysis “should present the environmental impacts of the proposal and the alternatives in comparative form, thus sharply defining the issues and providing a clear basis for choice.” According to CEQ guidelines the alternatives analysis is also required to: • • • • • • “Include the alternative of no action” “…explore and objectively evaluate all reasonable alternatives, and for alternatives which were eliminated from detailed study, briefly discuss the reasons for their having been eliminated” “Devote substantial treatment to each alternative considered in detail including the proposed action so that reviewers may evaluate their comparative merits” “Include reasonable alternatives not within the jurisdiction of the lead agency”’ “Identify the agency’s preferred alternative or alternatives, if one or more exists, in the draft statement and identify such alternative in the final statement unless another law prohibits the expression of such a preference” “Include appropriate mitigation measures not already included in the proposed action or alternatives” The analysis of alternatives considered in this Revised Final EIS was conducted under these guidelines to address the following: • • • No Action Alternative. A decision not to proceed with the proposed action to develop a new USP and FPC. Alternative Locations-Nationwide. Locations other than the Letcher County, Kentucky area for implementation of the proposed action. Alternative Locations. Within the Geographic Area of Interest Warranting Consideration. Potential site(s) which meet minimum requirements for accommodating the proposed facility are located with the geographic area of interest (Kentucky), and have been offered and are available for Bureau consideration. A discussion of these alternatives follows. No reasonable alternatives outside the jurisdiction of the Bureau (the lead agency) have been identified or warrant inclusion in the Revised Final EIS. NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE Under the No Action Alternative, the Bureau would not acquire property or construct and operate a new USP or FPC. Existing USPs would remain overcrowded and prevent the Bureau from meeting its mission. The No Action Alternative would avoid potential impacts associated with the development of a USP and FPC. The No Action Alternative does not meet the project purpose and need and is therefore, not considered a viable alternative. The No Action Alternative is discussed in this Revised Final EIS because it serves as a baseline against which to compare the action alternatives. 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 2-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS-NATIONWIDE The locations of new federal correctional facilities are determined by the need for incarceration in various regions of the country and the resources available to meet that need. To meet these needs the Bureau routinely identifies and evaluates potential sites that may be appropriate for development of new federal correctional facilities. Under an ongoing Congressional mandate, consideration is given to surplus properties while other publicly or privately owned properties offered to the Bureau are also examined for possible use. The initial steps in the planning process include the identification and evaluation of potential sites. Identification of a site that has the potential to house more than one federal correctional facility is a key factor in the evaluation of sites. Acquisition of property that has the potential for facility expansion provides the Bureau with the opportunity to expand as the inmate population grows. The Bureau also responds to initiatives from communities requesting consideration to host new federal correctional facilities. When approached by a community to host a facility, the Bureau’s first steps are to visit the sites offered and: • • • • • Identify the interest and support of the community, including the support/opposition of elected and appointed officials, community leaders, stakeholders, and the general public in having a federal correctional facility within their community Identify suitable locations for development of the federal correctional facility based on infrastructure conditions, environmental resources, land use and zoning, and other related criteria. Determine the on-site conditions including constructability of the site Identify potential environmental issues that require consideration under NEPA (National Historic Preservation Act [NHPA], CWA, Endangered Species Act, etc.) Determine what further investigations and detailed studies may be warranted to obtain additional information about the potential sites After the initial screening process, those sites with favorable conditions are moved forward and evaluated under another set of criteria, including optimal infrastructure and environmental requirements. The criteria used to evaluate the sites are established by the Bureau; however, these general criteria can be supplemented if needed to assess issues or potential issues and make sure they are addressed adequately in the evaluation of the sites. The general criteria the Bureau uses to screen potential sites for development include: • • • • • 2-2 The site should have sufficient land area (300 to 350 acres minimum [121 to 142 hectares]) to accommodate the institution and ancillary facilities, provide a buffer zone between the facility and neighboring properties, and allow for future expansion Proposed site should be relatively flat (less than 10 percent grade) to provide for minimal site preparation and proper drainage (this can be affected by geographic regions with mountainous terrain) Sites should avoid significant environmental resources (i.e., floodplains, wetlands, threatened and endangered species, cultural and historic resources, etc.) Sites should avoid potential incompatible land use conflicts Emergency services, including police and fire protection, and utilities should be able to provide services to the prospective sites 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky • • Site should be served by well-maintained state and county roadways to ensure safe commutes for employees, service vehicles, and visitors Support of key elected officials, community leaders, the public and owners of the sites Sites that the Bureau determines meet these general criteria, and are viable for the development of a federal correctional facility, are then evaluated in more detail in either an EA or EIS, in compliance with NEPA. ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT The Bureau has a priority need for additional facilities within the Bureau’s Mid-Atlantic Region. No reasonable alternatives (land or existing facilities) outside of the jurisdiction of the Bureau were identified within the Mid-Atlantic Region. In addition, no other lands/facilities in the Mid-Atlantic Region within the jurisdiction of the Bureau have sufficient space to accommodate the development of the proposed facilities. The Bureau was contacted by the Letcher County Planning Commission with an offer of potential sites for a new USP and FPC in Letcher County, Kentucky. Understanding the needs of the Bureau, the Letcher County Planning Commission identified potential locations for development and brought these sites to the attention of the Bureau to determine if the Bureau had an interest in developing a new facility at one of the locations. The opportunity to provide additional bedspace in Letcher County would meet the need for additional capacity within the Mid-Atlantic Region, afford the Bureau continued management of inmates originating from the region, and allow those inmates to remain close to family and friends. The process to identify potential sites for constructing a USP and FPC in Letcher County began in 2008 with site reconnaissance studies of four sites that had been offered to the Bureau by members of the community. The purpose of the site reconnaissance studies was to collect preliminary data on the sites and determine their suitability for development based on site conditions, infrastructure and utilities, and environmental resources. Based on this initial analysis, it was determined that the four sites evaluated should be studied in more detail in a feasibility study: Meadow Branch, Payne Gap, Roxana, and Van/Fields. The feasibility study provided an opportunity for more detailed analysis of each site and identified constraints that may eliminate a site from further consideration. In 2011, the Bureau completed a feasibility study that assessed cultural resources, wetlands, geologic conditions, and infrastructure. The feasibility study also included the production of aerial and topographic mapping, and a boundary survey. During the initial phases of the feasibility study, the Meadow Branch site was removed from further consideration due to changes with the offeror, and the site no longer available for consideration by the Bureau; therefore, no detailed analysis of the site was included in the feasibility study. During the feasibility study for the remaining three sites, wetlands were delineated, archaeological and historic structures surveys were completed, and geotechnical studies were conducted. The feasibility study highlighted potential concerns with development of the sites, as well as estimated costs of infrastructure improvement and site preparation (excavation and/or fill at each site, and grading activities) on each site. The feasibility study determined that there were no constraints that would prevent development of the three sites (TEC, Inc. 2012). During the finalization of the feasibility study there were changes with the offeror of the Van/Fields site, and this site was removed from further consideration. The remaining two sites, Payne Gap and Roxana, were identified as alternatives to be carried forward for study in an EIS (Figure 2-1). 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 2-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 2-1. Payne Gap and Roxana Site Locations 2-4 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky ALTERNATIVE 1 – PAYNE GAP Under Alternative 1, the Bureau would acquire approximately 753 acres (305 hectares) of land known as the Payne Gap site. The site is located in eastern Letcher County, approximately 7 miles northeast of Whitesburg, along the Kentucky and Virginia border (Figures 2-1 and 2-2). The Bureau would then construct and operate a USP and FPC on this site. The site is situated on a gently sloped to steeply sloped upland land form above the Kentucky River at its confluence with the Laurel Fork. U.S. Route 119 is located along the north end of the proposed site and would provide site access. Figure 2-3 depicts the proposed conceptual layout of the facility at the Payne Gap site. The site is forested with secondary growth forests, and the original topography of portions of the site have been altered by past surface and deep mining and by associated mining activities such as spoil piles, roads, and fill piles. Mining permit applications indicate surface and underground mining operations have occurred within the proposed project site since the 1950s. No active mining is occurring on site. The Bureau would require a minimum of 300 acres (121 hectares) for construction of the USP and FPC at this site. To accommodate the USP, FPC, ancillary buildings, and roads as described in Section 1.6, Proposed Action, the site would require forest clearing and clear mined area, and extensive excavation and fill material to level and prepare the site for construction. All excavated materials, which would include the removal of mine spoil, would be used on-site for structural fill or placed as spoil fill. The excavated soil and rock would be compacted to create a structural fill for the building pads or filled into the valleys adjacent to the northwest, west, and southeast of the proposed USP location. Table 2-1 depicts the site preparation quantities. Table 2-1. Estimated Site Preparation Quantities for Alternative 1 - Payne Gap Spoil Excavation Rock Excavation Structural Fill Spoil Fill Clear Mined Area Clear Forest Area Note: yd3 = cubic yards. 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 Activity Quantity 2,794,660 yd3 8,117,470 yd3 1,716,095 yd3 12,106,917 yd3 7 acres (3 hectares) 211 acres (85 hectares) 2-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 2-2. Payne Gap Project Location 2-6 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 2-3. Payne Gap USP and FPC Conceptual Layout 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 2-7 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky ALTERNATIVE 2 – ROXANA Under Alternative 2, the Bureau would acquire approximately 700 acres (283 hectares) of land known as the Roxana site. The site is located 7.5 miles west of Whitesburg, Kentucky (Figures 2-1 and 2-4). The Bureau would then construct and operate a USP and FPC on this site. Figure 2-5 depicts the proposed conceptual layout of the facility at the Roxana site. The site is forested except for a large open area near the center of the site created from past surface mining activities. Mining permit applications indicate the site was surface mined in the late 1980s to early 1990s. No active mining is occurring on site. The Bureau would require a minimum of 300 acres (121 hectares) for construction of the USP and FPC at this site. To accommodate the USP, FPC, ancillary buildings, and roads as described in Section 1.6, Proposed Action, the site would require extensive excavation of spoil material and lesser amounts of structural fill and spoil fill. Preparation of the site for construction activities would also require clear mined area and forest clearing. Excavation of the site would include the removal of mine spoil. All excavated materials would be used on-site for structural fill. The excavated soil and rock would be compacted to create a structural fill for the building pads or filled into the valleys adjacent to the northwest and southwest of the proposed USP location. Table 2-2 depicts site preparation quantities. Table 2-2. Estimated Site Preparation Quantities for Alternative 2 - Roxana Spoil Excavation Rock Excavation Structural Fill Spoil Fill Clear Mined Area Clear Forest Area Activity Note: yd3 = cubic yards. Quantity 9,204,340 yd3 953,246 yd3 9,402,582 yd3 0 81 acres (33 hectares) 110 acres (44 hectares) PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Alternative 2 – Roxana is the preferred alternative because it best meets the project needs and, on balance, would have fewer impacts to the human environment. Threatened and endangered species was a factor in the identification of the preferred alternative. Studies identified both summer roosting habitat and winter hibernaculum of federally listed bat species at the Payne Gap site. Identification of the winter bat hibernaculum would require additional studies to determine the extent of winter hibernaculum and impacts to the hibernaculum. Additionally, the site would impact a significant amount of summer roosting habitat versus the amount that would be impacted at the Roxana site. The Payne Gap site would also have significant impacts to potable water capacity, wastewater treatment, and natural gas infrastructure, while the Roxana site would have less than significant impacts to infrastructure and utilities. Based upon comparison of these and other potential environmental impacts applicable to each site, including wetlands and stream impacts and significantly greater site preparation required for the Payne Gap site, the Roxana site would have fewer natural resource and other environmental impacts. Therefore, the Roxana site has been determined to be the preferred alternative. 2-8 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 2-4. Roxana Project Location 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 2-9 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 2-5. Roxana USP and FPC Conceptual Layout 2-10 2.0 Alternatives March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 3.0 DEFINITION OF RESOURCE LAND USE AND ZONING Land use often refers to human modification of land for residential or economic purposes. Land use categories typically include agriculture (includes livestock production), forestry, residential, commercial, industrial, transportation, utilities, mining, recreation, and communication. Land uses are frequently regulated by management plans, land use plans, comprehensive plans, and local zoning and ordinances. These plans and regulations assist in identifying where future development can occur so it is compatible with surrounding land uses and, in protecting specially designated or environmentally sensitive uses. Land use is interrelated with other resource areas including noise, socioeconomics, biological resources, and cultural resources. The impact analysis in this Revised Final EIS for land use focuses on those areas affected by proposed construction and operation of the USP and FPC. TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND SOILS Topography describes the physical surface of the land and includes elevation, slope, and other general surface features. Geologic factors influence soil stability, bedrock depth, and seismic properties. Soil is the unconsolidated material above bedrock. Soil is formed from the weathering of bedrock and other parent materials. The Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) (7 U.S. Code [USC] 4201 et seq.) was introduced to conserve farmland soil and discourage the conversion of prime farmland soil to a non-agricultural use. The FPPA considers prime farmland soils as those that have the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops, and are also available for these uses. It has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply needed to economically produce sustained high yields of crops when treated and managed. Soils of statewide importance are those soils that are nearly prime farmland and that economically produce high yields of crops when treated and managed according to acceptable farming methods. The FPPA is based on the protection of prime farmland soils and not on whether the area is in agricultural use. Topography, geology, and soil resources are analyzed in this Revised Final EIS in terms of drainage, excavation and fill activities, erosion, and prime farmland. The analysis focuses on the area of soils that would be disturbed, the potential for erosion of soils from construction areas, and the potential for eroded soils to become pollutants in downstream surface water during storm events. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are identified to minimize soil impacts and prevent or control pollutant releases into stormwater. SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Socioeconomics describes the basic attributes and resources associated with the human environment, particularly population, employment, income, and housing. The affected area for socioeconomics is defined as the area where principal effects arising from the construction and operation of the proposed USP and FPC are likely to occur. The proposed action alternatives have the potential to cause socioeconomic impacts to the communities around the proposed sites through changes or relocation of Bureau personnel and construction expenditures. 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 3-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Executive Order (EO) 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low-Income Populations (Environmental Justice), was issued in 1994. It stipulates that each federal agency is to make achieving environmental justice a part of its mission by identifying and addressing disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority and low-income populations. A minority population is defined as either: 1) the minority population of the affected area exceeds 50 percent, or 2) the minority population percentage of the affected area is meaningfully greater than the minority population percentage in the appropriate community of comparison. Low-income populations are identified where a meaningfully greater portion of the population is living below the poverty level threshold as compared to the appropriate community of comparison (CEQ 1997). The environmental justice analysis in this Revised Final EIS addresses the characteristics of race, ethnicity, and poverty status for populations residing in the immediate area of the proposed USP and FPC. EO 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (Protection of Children) was issued in 1997 requiring federal agencies to identify and assess environmental health risks and safety risks that may disproportionately affect children. It also requires that each federal agency is to ensure that its policies, programs, activities, and standards address disproportionate risks to children that result from environmental health risks or safety risks. In this Revised Final EIS, the protection of children analysis addresses the population under 18 residing in areas potentially affected by the construction and operation of the proposed USP and FPC. This socioeconomic analysis focuses on impacts due to population changes and construction expenditures. Economic impacts are defined to include direct effects, such as changes to employment, payrolls, and expenditures that affect the flow of dollars into the local economy and secondary effects, which result from the “ripple effect” of spending and re-spending in response to the direct effects. Socioeconomic impacts, particularly impacts such as those being evaluated in this Revised Final EIS, are often mixed: beneficial in terms of gains in jobs, expenditures, tax revenues, etc., and adverse in terms of growth management issues such as demands for housing and community services. This analysis in this Revised Final EIS identifies potential environmental justice issues. Impacts to environmental justice populations are identified where high and adverse human health or environmental effects may disproportionately affect minority or low-income populations. Impacts to children would occur if there was an increased disproportionate environmental, health, or safety risk to children. COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES Community services include police protection, fire protection, health care services and schools. The potentially affected area includes the cities, towns, and county where the proposed sites are located and where Bureau employees associated with the proposed action would live and work. The analysis in this Revised Final EIS focuses on the existing conditions of community services within the adjacent communities in terms of capacity and availability. The anticipated demand for community services is described in relation to proposed population increases in inmates, Bureau personnel, and their families. Lastly, the analysis describes ability of community services to accommodate anticipated changes in the demand for those services resulting from the proposed action. 3-2 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC Transportation and traffic refers to vehicle movement throughout a road and highway network. The study area for transportation and traffic includes the road and highway networks that surround and support the Payne Gap and Roxana sites. The American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials classify roadways as principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Principal arterials (i.e., arterial highways and interstates) serve to move traffic regionally and between population and activity centers with a minimal level of access to adjacent properties. Collector roadways (i.e., minor arterial and collector streets) serve to move traffic from population and activity centers and funnel them onto principal arterials with a moderate level of access to adjacent properties. Local roadways provide access to adjacent properties and move traffic onto collector and arterial roadways. Average daily traffic and design capacity of the roadway represent two parameters to measure traffic (Transportation Research Board 2010). Using these two measures of traffic, each roadway segment receives a corresponding level of service (LOS). The LOS designation is a professional industry standard used to describe the operating conditions of a roadway segment or intersection. The LOS is defined on a scale of A to F that describes the range of operating conditions on a particular type of roadway facility. LOS A through LOS B indicates free flow travel. LOS C indicates stable traffic flow. LOS D indicates the beginning of traffic congestion. LOS E indicates the nearing of traffic breakdown conditions. LOS F indicates stop-and-go traffic conditions and represents unacceptable congestion and delay. Impacts to transportation and traffic are analyzed in this Revised Final EIS by considering the possible changes to existing traffic conditions and the capacity of area roadways from proposed increases in commuter and construction traffic. Traffic impact studies were performed and the results, together with proposed mitigation measures appropriate for each site are included in Appendix F. AIR QUALITY Air quality is defined by ambient air concentrations of specific pollutants determined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to be of concern related to the health and welfare of the general public and the environment and are widespread across the U.S. The primary pollutants of concern, called “criteria pollutants,” include carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), suspended particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter (PM10), fine particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), and lead. Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the USEPA has established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for these pollutants (40 CFR 50). The NAAQS represent the maximum levels of background pollution that are considered acceptable, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect public health and welfare. Short-term standards (1-, 3-, 8-and 24-hour periods) are established for pollutants contributing to acute health effects, while long-term standards (quarterly and annual averages) are established for pollutants contributing to chronic health effects. The Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection (KDEP) has adopted the NAAQS, which are presented in Table 3-1. 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 3-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 3-1. Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant CO Lead NO2 PM10 PM2.5 O3 SO2 Averaging Time 8-hr 1-hr Rolling 3-Month Average Annual (arithmetic average) 1-hr 24-hr Annual (arithmetic average) 24-hr 8-hr 1-hour 3-hour Primary Standard 9 ppm 35 ppm Secondary Standard None 0.15 µg/m3 Same as Primary 53 ppb Same as Primary 100 ppb 150 µg/m3 None Same as Primary 12.0 µg/m3 15.0 µg/m3 35 µg/m 0.075 ppm 75 ppb - Same as Primary Same as Primary 0.5 ppm 3 Notes: ppb = parts per billion; ppm = parts per million; µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter. Source: USEPA 2011. In addition to the ambient air quality standards for criteria pollutants, national standards exist for hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) which are regulated under Section 112(b) of the 1990 CAA Amendments. The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants regulate HAP emissions from stationary sources. HAPs emitted from mobile sources are called Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSATs); these are compounds emitted from highway vehicles and non-road equipment that are known or suspected to cause cancer or other serious health and environmental effects. In 2001, USEPA issued its first MSAT Rule, which identified 21 compounds as being HAPs that required regulation. A subset of six of these MSAT compounds were identified as having the greatest influence on health and include benzene; 1,3-butadiene; formaldehyde; acrolein; acetaldehyde; and diesel particulate matter. In February 2007, USEPA issued a second MSAT Rule, which generally supported the findings in the first rule and provided additional recommendations of compounds having the greatest impact on health. The rule also identified several engine emission certification standards that must be implemented. Unlike the criteria pollutants, there are no NAAQS for HAPs. The primary control methodologies instituted by federal regulation for MSATs involve technological improvements for reducing their content in fuel and altering engine operating characteristics to reduce the volume of pollutants generated during combustion. MSATs would be the primary HAPs emitted by mobile sources during construction and operation of the proposed action alternatives. The equipment used during construction would likely vary in age and have a range of pollution reduction effectiveness. Construction equipment, however, would be operated intermittently over a large area and would produce negligible ambient HAPs in a localized area. Therefore, MSAT emissions are not considered further in this analysis. A region’s air quality is influenced by many factors including the type and amount of pollutants emitted into the atmosphere, the size and topography of the air basin, and the prevailing meteorological conditions. Pollutant emissions typically refer to the amount of pollutants or pollutant precursors introduced into the atmosphere by a source or group of sources. Pollutant emissions contribute to the ambient air concentrations of criteria pollutants, either by directly affecting the pollutant concentrations measured in the ambient air or by interacting in the atmosphere to form criteria pollutants. Primary pollutants, such as CO, SO2, lead, and some particulates, are emitted directly into the atmosphere from emission sources. Secondary pollutants, such as O3, NO2, and some particulates are formed through 3-4 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky atmospheric chemical reactions that are influenced by meteorology, ultraviolet light, and other atmospheric processes. NOISE Sound is a physical phenomenon consisting of minute vibrations that travel through a medium, such as air or water, and are sensed by the human ear. The perception and evaluation of sound involves three basic physical characteristics: • • • Intensity – the acoustic energy, which is expressed in terms of sound pressure, in decibels (dB). Frequency – the number of cycles per second the air vibrates, in Hertz. Duration – the length of time the sound can be detected. Noise is defined as unwanted or annoying sound that interferes with or disrupts normal human activities. Although continuous and extended exposure to high noise levels (e.g., through occupational exposure) can cause hearing loss, the principal human response to noise is annoyance. The response of different individuals to similar noise events is diverse and is influenced by the type of noise, perceived importance of the noise, its appropriateness in the setting, time of day, type of activity during which the noise occurs, and sensitivity of the individual. Levels of noise are measured in units called dB. However, a number of factors affect how the human ear perceives sound: the actual level of noise, frequency, period of exposure, and fluctuations in noise levels during exposure. The human ear cannot equally perceive all pitches or frequencies and noise measurements are therefore adjusted or weighted to compensate for the human lack of sensitivity to lowand high-pitched sounds. This adjusted unit is known as the A-weighted decibel, or dBA. The A-weighted metric, de-emphasizes very low and very high pitched sound and is most often applied to noise generated by motor vehicle traffic, small boats, and aircraft. Background, or ambient, noise levels are all sounds present in an environment and are dependent upon land use. Very rural areas with little human activity would be expected to have the lowest levels of background noise, typically on the order of 15 to 20 dBA (USEPA 1971). Noise increases with increased population, as demonstrated in Table 3-2. Table 3-2. Sound Levels Estimated by Population Density Description Rural (undeveloped) Quiet suburban Normal suburban Urban Noisy urban Very noisy urban Source: USEPA 1982. Population Density (people per square mile) 20 60 600 2,000 6,000 20,000 Sound Level (dB) 35 45 50 55 60 65 INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES Infrastructure refers to the system of public works, such as utilities, that provides the underlying framework for a community. Infrastructure components and utilities discussed in this Revised Final EIS include the water supply system, wastewater system, stormwater drainage system, electrical supply facilities, natural gas system, and solid waste management facilities. Transportation infrastructure, including roadway and street systems, the movement of vehicles, and mass transit, are discussed in Section 3.5, Transportation and Traffic. 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 3-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Because infrastructure and utilities systems are directly related to activities within the communities from which they draw their services, the potentially affected area includes the county where they occur. The assessment of impacts is based on comparing existing use and conditions to anticipated changes in capacity associated with the utilities. The analysis compares current use with anticipated future demands to determine potential impacts. CULTURAL RESOURCES Cultural resources are defined as prehistoric or historic sites, buildings, structures, objects, archaeological sites, districts, or other physical evidence of human activity that are considered important to a culture or community for scientific, traditional, or religious reasons. Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic archaeological resources, architectural resources, and traditional cultural properties (TCPs). • • • Archaeological resources – places where people changed the ground surface or left artifacts or other physical remains (e.g., arrowheads or bottles). Architectural resources – standing buildings, dams, canals, bridges, and other structures. Traditional cultural properties – resources associated with the cultural practices and beliefs of a living community that link that community to its past and help maintain its cultural identity. TCPs may include archaeological resources, locations of historic events, sacred areas, sources of raw materials for making tools, sacred objects, or traditional hunting and gathering areas. Section 106 of the NHPA of 1966, as amended, and as implemented by 36 CFR 800, requires federal agencies to consider the effects of their actions on historic properties before undertaking a project that uses federal funds or is located on federal lands. A historic property is defined as any cultural resource that is included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The NRHP, administered by the National Park Service, is the official inventory of cultural resources that are significant in American history, prehistory, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture. The NRHP also includes National Historic Landmarks. In consideration of 36 CFR 800, federal agencies are required to consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Indian Tribes, representatives of local governments, and the public in a manner appropriate to the agency planning process for the planned action (undertaking) and to the nature of the undertaking and its potential to cause effects on historic properties. The methodology for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating impacts to cultural resources has been established through federal laws and regulations including the NHPA, the Archaeological Resource Protection Act, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, and the American Indian Religious Freedom Act. The affected environment for cultural and traditional resources is also referred to as the area of potential effects (APE). The APE must be defined in order to assess the effects of a proposed action on a historic property. An APE is defined as the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause changes in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist (36 CFR 800.16[d]). The analysis in this Revised Final EIS applies the criteria of adverse effect (36 CFR 800.5) to evaluate the effects of the proposed action on any historic properties located in the APE of each action alternative. A project affects a historic property when it alters the property’s characteristics (including relevant features of its environment or use) that qualify it as significant according to National Register criteria. Adverse effects may include the following: physical destruction, damage, or alteration of all or part of the resource; alteration of the character of the surrounding environment that contributes to the resource’s 3-6 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky qualifications for the NRHP; introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric elements that are out of character with the resource or alter its setting; and neglect of the resource resulting in its deterioration or destruction. Impacts to traditional Native American tribal properties can be determined only through consultation with the affected Tribes. However, ground disturbance to prehistoric archaeological sites and graves has often been cited as an adverse impact. Analysis of potential impacts to historic properties considers both direct and indirect impacts. Direct impacts may be the result of physically altering, damaging, or destroying all or part of a historic property, or neglecting the property to the extent that it deteriorates or is destroyed. Indirect impacts are those that may occur as a result of the completed project by altering characteristics of the surrounding environment through the introduction of visual or audible elements that are out of character for the period the property represents. An example of an indirect effect is increased vehicular or pedestrian traffic in the vicinity of the property. WATER RESOURCES Water resources include both surface and subsurface water. For the purposes of this Revised Final EIS, water resources include the following topics: surface water, wetlands, groundwater, and floodplains. Surface Water Wetlands, lakes, ponds, impoundments, rivers, and streams compose surface water resources that are important for economic, ecological, recreational, and human health reasons. According to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), streams are drainage features that may contain perennial streams (permanent flows), intermittent streams (flows during much of the year but drying seasonally), or ephemeral streams (flows only after storm events). Ponds are open water bodies (USACE 1987). Waters of the U.S. are defined as (1) traditional navigable waters, (2) wetlands adjacent to navigable waters, (3) non-navigable tributaries of traditional navigable waters that are relatively permanent where the tributaries typically flow perennially or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3 months), and (4) wetlands that directly abut such tributaries under Section 404 of the CWA, as amended, and are regulated by the USEPA and the USACE. Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, as amended (33 USC § 403) regulates structures or work that would affect navigable waters of the U.S. Structures include any pier, wharf, bulkhead, etc. Work includes dredging, filling, excavation, or other modifications to navigable waters of the U.S. The USACE issues permits for work or structures in navigable waters of the U.S. Anyone proposing to conduct a project that requires a federal permit or involves dredge or fill activities that may result in a discharge to surface waters and/or waters of the U.S. is required to obtain a CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification, verifying that the project activities will comply with water quality standards. Water quality refers to the suitability of water for a particular use based on selected physical, chemical, and biological characteristics. Potential uses considered include potable water, irrigation, and water able to support life. For the purposes of this Revised Final EIS, water quality is considered with the statutory requirements regarding water quality conditions. 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 3-7 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky The CWA of 1972, as amended (33 USC §§ 1251 et seq.), is the primary federal law that protects the nation’s waters, including lakes, rivers, and coastal areas. The primary objective of the CWA is to restore and maintain the integrity of the nation’s waters. The CWA prohibits all unpermitted discharge of any pollutant into any jurisdictional waters of the U.S. The USEPA is responsible for administering the water quality requirements of the CWA. To this end, the USEPA developed pollutant-specific water quality standards (referred to as total maximum daily load [TMDL]) to identify waters for which quality is sufficiently poor and for which effluent limits would be insufficient to meet water quality standards (KDEP 2013). Water quality is regulated under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended by the CWA. The CWA prohibits spills, leaks, or other discharges of oil or hazardous substances into the waters of the U.S. in quantities that may be harmful. Direct discharges of effluents are regulated under the CWA through National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit program administered by the USEPA or under state National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System programs approved by the USEPA. The CWA also requires each state to establish water quality standards for its surface waters derived from the amount of pollutants that can be assimilated by a body of water without deterioration of a designated use. Waters not meeting the water quality standards may require the establishment of a TMDL for the waterbody. Impaired waters requiring a TMDL are called 303(d) listed waters (KDEP 2013). Wetlands According to USACE regulations, wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands are currently regulated by the USACE under Section 404 of the CWA as a subset of all “waters of the U.S.” The term “waters of the U.S.” has a broad meaning under the CWA and incorporates deepwater aquatic habitats and special aquatic habitats, including wetlands. Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. regulated under the CWA include coastal and inland waters, lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, intermittent streams, and “other” waters that, if degraded or destroyed, could affect interstate commerce. The full regulatory definition of waters of the U.S. is provided in the CWA. EO 11990, Protection of Wetlands, directs federal agencies to take action to minimize the destruction, loss, or degradation of wetlands on their property and mandates review of proposed actions on wetlands through procedures established by NEPA. It requires that federal agencies establish and implement procedures to minimize development in wetlands. Wetlands provide many functions and values such as flood flow alteration, groundwater recharge/discharge, and fish and wildlife habitat. The CWA Section 404 requires an USACE-issued permit for the dredging and/or filling of wetlands or other waters of the U.S. Groundwater Groundwater is water that flows or seeps downward and saturates soil or rock, supplying springs and wells. Groundwater is used for water consumption, agricultural irrigation, and industrial applications. The principal federal regulation concerning the protection of groundwater is the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (42 USC §§ 300 et seq.; amended in 1986 and 1996). This act was set forth to protect the nation’s 3-8 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky public water supplies, including groundwater in areas where it is the main potable water source. The USEPA and the KDEP Division of Water enforce Safe Drinking Water Act standards and related legislation to protect public health. Floodplains EO 11988, Floodplain Management, defines floodplains as the lowland and relatively flat areas adjoining inland waters, including at a minimum, that area subject to a 1 percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. The area subject to a 1 percent chance of flooding is referred to as the 100-year floodplain. Floodplain delineation maps are produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and provide a basis for comparing the locale of the proposed action to the floodplains. EO 11988 directs federal agencies to avoid construction in Revised Final floodplains and establishes a process for analysis and public notice if development is unavoidable. In this Revised Final EIS, the analysis of floodplains considers if any new construction is proposed within a floodplain or may impede the functions of floodplains in conveying floodwaters. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Biological resources include living, native, or naturalized plant and animal species and the habitats where they occur. Plant associations are referred to as vegetation and animal species are referred to as wildlife. Habitat can be defined as the resources and conditions present in an area that supports the existence of a plant or animal (Hall et al. 1997). Although the existence and preservation of biological resources are intrinsically valuable, these resources also provide aesthetic, recreational, and socioeconomic values to society. This analysis focuses on species or vegetation types that are important to the function of the ecosystem, of special societal importance, or are protected under federal or state law or statute. For purposes of this Revised Final EIS, these resources are divided into three major categories: vegetation, wildlife, and threatened and endangered species. Vegetation includes terrestrial plant communities. The analysis focuses on vegetation types that are important to the function of the ecosystem or are protected under federal or state law. Wildlife includes all vertebrate animals (i.e., mammals, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and fish) and sometimes invertebrate species or species groups such as mollusks or insects. Virtually all birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The MBTA was designed to protect migratory birds (including their eggs, nests, and feathers) and their habitats. An activity has a significant adverse effect if, over a reasonable period of time, it diminishes the capacity of a population of a migratory bird species to maintain genetic diversity, to reproduce, and to function effectively in its native ecosystem. Threatened and endangered species include plant and animal species that are listed or proposed for listing by the USFWS under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The federal ESA provides for the conservation of threatened and endangered species of plants and animals and the habitats where they are found. ESA candidate species are plant or animal species for which the USFWS has sufficient information on file regarding biological vulnerability and threats to support a proposal that would list them as endangered or threatened under the ESA, based on the most recent candidate review. In addition, designated and proposed critical habitat for ESA-listed species are also included in this Revised Final EIS, as appropriate. Critical habitat is a specific geographic area that contains features essential for the conservation of a 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 3-9 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky threatened or endangered species and that may require special management and protection. This Revised Final EIS also addresses species that are listed by the Commonwealth of Kentucky as threatened or endangered. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE The analysis of hazardous materials, hazardous waste, toxic substances, and contaminated sites focuses on the potential for these substances to be introduced into the environment from maintenance or during construction activities. Potentially affected areas consist of construction and operational maintenance areas. Factors considered in the analysis include the potential for increased human health risk or environmental exposure, as well as changes in the quantity and types of hazardous substances transported, stored, used, and disposed. The methodology for contaminated sites compares the proximity of proposed facility development to contaminated sites and considers the operational uses of the facilities to determine potential impacts to or from the sites. Hazardous Materials Hazardous materials are chemical substances that pose a substantial hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, handled, used, packaged, stored, transported, or disposed. Hazardous materials are identified and regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (42 USC 9601 et seq.); the Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 USC 651 et seq.); and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (42 USC 11001 et seq.). Hazardous materials commonly used at Bureau facilities include petroleum and oil. Hazardous Waste The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (40 CFR 240–280) and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (40 CFR 260) define hazardous waste as a solid waste, or combination of wastes that due to its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical or infectious characteristics, may cause or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible or incapacitating reversible illness, or may pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, disposed of, or otherwise managed. A solid waste is a hazardous waste if it is not excluded from regulation as a hazardous waste under 40 CFR 261.4(b) and if it exhibits identified characteristics of hazardous waste or meets other specified criteria [see 40 CFR 261.3(a)]. Toxic Substances The Toxic Substance Control Act addresses those chemical substances and mixtures that may present unreasonable risk of personal injury or health of the environment from their manufacturing, processing, distribution, use, or disposal. The Toxic Substance Control Act Chemical Substances Inventory lists information on more than 62,000 chemicals and substances, such as asbestos, lead-based paint, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS This section defines cumulative impacts and describes the approach taken in the analysis of cumulative impacts. Chapter 8, Cumulative Impacts, contains descriptions of other actions relevant to cumulative impacts, an analysis of the incremental interaction the proposed action may have with other actions, and an evaluation of the cumulative impacts potentially resulting from these interactions. 3-10 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky The approach taken in the analysis of cumulative impacts follows the objectives of NEPA, CEQ regulations, and CEQ guidance. Cumulative impacts are defined in 40 CFR 1508.7 as: “the impact on the environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (Federal or Non-Federal) or person undertakes such other actions.” Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time. A cumulative impact results from the additive effect of all projects in the same geographical area. Generally, an impact can be considered cumulative if: a) effects of several actions occur in the same locale, b) effects on a particular resource are the same in nature, and c) effects are longterm in nature. The common factor key to cumulative assessment is identifying any potential temporally and/or spatially overlapping or successive effects that may significantly affect resources in the analysis areas. ASSESSING SIGNIFICANCE Chapters 4 and 5 present the affected environment and analysis of the potential direct and indirect effects of each alternative for each resource area described in this chapter. Chapter 8 presents the analysis of the potential cumulative effects of each alternative for each resource area. The level of significance is assessed according to NEPA implementing regulations at 40 CFR 1508.27, which requires considerations of both context and intensity. 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 3-11 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) 3-12 3.0 Definition of Resource March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4.0 ALTERNATIVE 1 – PAYNE GAP LAND USE AND ZONING Potential impacts to land use are assessed by comparing the existing land uses with the changes that would occur from implementation of the proposed action, including induced effects. Impacts to land use are evaluated for significance by determining the degree to which proposed development and uses conflict with existing land use and local plans and policies. Under the proposed action, potential short-term and long-term impacts to land use would occur from construction and operation of the USP and FPC. Growth induced impacts to land use could result from spending wages and salaries by direct and indirect employees on items such as food, housing, transportation, and medical services. This spending creates induced employment in nearly all sectors of the economy; especially service sectors (see Section 4.3, Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice). Affected Environment Land use associated with the proposed location of Alternative 1 primarily consists of forested areas. Portions of the Payne Gap site were previously deep mined; however, mining activities no longer occur at the site. Land use surrounding the site is also primarily forested, with small single-family residences adjacent to the site. Coal mining once occurred in the area, but currently there are only three active coal mining operations located between 1 and 5 miles from the Payne Gap site (Kentucky Mine Mapping Information System 2008). There are no zoning ordinances or land use classifications identified for this area (DePriest 2013). Figure 4-1 depicts existing land use associated with Alternative 1. Environmental Consequences 4.1.2.1 Construction Construction of a USP and FPC would result in changes to land use on the 753-acre (305-hectare) Payne Gap site. Approximately 218 acres (88 hectares) of the Payne Gap site would be converted from forested and former mining land uses to a government/institutional land use. However, a buffer area would remain around the USP and FPC to separate the federal correctional facility from the adjacent properties, and would be compatible with the adjacent land uses. Due to the lack of zoning ordinances and land use classifications, construction of the proposed USP and FPC would not result in incompatible land uses from a regulatory perspective. 4.1.2.2 Operations There would be no impacts to adjacent land uses from operation of the USP and FPC, as the federal correctional facility would be separated from adjacent properties by a buffer area. The buffer area would be compatible with adjacent land uses. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the USP and FPC would not be constructed at the Payne Gap site and no potential land use compatibility issues with adjacent land uses would occur. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 4-1. Payne Gap Land Use 4-2 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Mitigation Federal agencies are not subject to local/regional zoning or land use development regulations. However, the Bureau would take the following measures to help minimize potential adverse impacts to surrounding land uses: • • provide an open space and vegetative buffer between the USP and FPC to maintain visual compatibility with surrounding properties design and locate the facilities to reduce the visual presence of the facility from neighboring properties TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND SOILS Affected Environment The topography on the Payne Gap site is typified by the mountains valleys complex associated with western Appalachian Mountains. The topography at Payne Gap has been significantly affected by strip mining activities, which historically occurred on site. According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute Jenkins West topographic quadrangle map, elevations on site range from a low of 1,385 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the North Fork of the Kentucky River to a high of 2,965 feet AMSL on Pine Mountain in the southern portion of the site (University of Kentucky 2013). The majority of slopes on site are very steep, well over 15 percent. The Payne Gap site is underlain by the Breathitt Group, which is composed of the Pikeville Formation and the Hyden Formation. The geology underlying the Payne Gap site is primarily Pikeville Formation (Kentucky Geological Survey [KGS] 2013). The soils on the Payne Gap site are varied as a result of topography and mining disturbance, but none of the soils are listed as hydric by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The three most common soils at the Payne Gap site are composed of the Cloverlick-Kimper-Highsplint complex (30 to 65 percent slopes), the Dekalb-Gilpin-Raye complex (25 to 65 percent slopes), and the Kaymine, Fairpoint, and Fiveblock soil series (2 to 70 percent slopes). To a lesser degree, the following soils are on the site: Caneyville-Renox-Bledsoe complex (50 to 80 percent slopes), Shelocta-Highsplint complex (30 to 65 percent slopes), and Urban land Udorthents complex (0 to 15 percent slopes) (NRCS 2013). These soils have not been designated by NRCS as prime farmland soils. Environmental Consequences Implementation of the proposed action under Alternative 1 would result in significant impacts to topography, geology, and soils. 4.2.2.1 Construction Development of the site would require significant excavation and fill activities to create a level pad for construction of the facilities and access roads. A 2:1 fill slope and a 1:1 cut slope were used in the estimate of fill and excavation quantities adjacent to the building pads and roads to transition to the original topography at the Payne Gap site. More detail on the earthwork calculations can be found in Appendix B, Excavation and Grading Calculations. As identified in Table 2-1, Estimated Site Preparation Quantities for Alternative 1 - Payne Gap, excavation activities (cut) would include 2,794,660 cubic yards (2,136,671 cubic meters) of soil material and 8,117,470 cubic yards (6,206,251 cubic meters) 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky of rock. The excavated soil and rock would be filled into the valleys as spoil or compacted to create a structural fill for the building pads. The amount of structural fill was estimated to be 1,716,095 cubic yards (1,312,048 cubic meters) and the amount of spoil fill would be 12,106,917 cubic yards (9,256,402 cubic meters). All excavated materials would be used on-site for structural fill or placed as spoil fill. The maximum cut (excavation) at Payne Gap would be approximately 60 meters and the maximum fill would be approximately 80 meters. Removal of bedrock would require blasting activities. Impacts resulting from the cut and fill activities would include loss of productive soil, erosion, and destabilization of slopes. As a result of the excavation and fill activities, the topography of the site would change at the maximum cut from 555 meters to 495 meters (mean sea level [MSL]) in the main building area and at the maximum fill from 470 meters to 550 meters MSL in the prison camp area. The project area does not contain soils classified as prime farmland soils, which are protected under the FPPA; therefore, prime farmland soils would not be impacted and no coordination with NRCS would be required. 4.2.2.2 Operations No further impacts to topography, geology or soils are anticipated from the operation of the USP and FPC. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the USP and FPC would not be constructed. Therefore, significant excavation, fill, and grading activities would not occur. As a result, there would be no impacts to topography, geology, or soils. Mitigation The Bureau would prepare a soil erosion and sediment control plan and submit it to the Kentucky Division of Water for approval prior to construction. The erosion and sediment control plan would outline the measures and BMPs to be used for controlling on-site erosion and sedimentation during construction. BMPs could include placement of silt fencing adjacent to surface waters and wetlands to prevent the introduction of sediment; the use of hay bales to minimize the spread of sediment off the construction site; stabilization of steep slopes; use of tree clearing plans; and stormwater control plans to manage stormwater runoff and keep it on-site during construction. Additionally, construction of the USP, FPC, and ancillary facilities could be phased to occur at different times, resulting in the minimization of disturbed soil by clearing only the area necessary for the current phase of construction. Re-vegetation of disturbed areas following the completion of construction would also occur to minimize the erosion of exposed soil. SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE This socioeconomic analysis focuses on impacts due to construction and operation of the proposed action. The assessment examines how the alternatives would affect population, employment, income, and housing characteristics in the study area. Economic impacts are defined to include direct effects, such as changes to employment and expenditures that affect the flow of dollars into the local economy, and indirect effects, which result from the “ripple effect” of spending and re-spending in response to the direct effects. 4-4 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Socioeconomic impacts, particularly impacts such as those being evaluated in this Revised Final EIS, are often mixed: beneficial in terms of gains in jobs, expenditures, tax revenues, etc., and potentially adverse in terms of growth management issues such as demands for housing and community services. This analysis also identifies potential environmental justice issues. Impacts to environmental justice populations are identified where high and adverse human health or environmental effects may disproportionately affect minority or low-income populations. Impacts to children would occur if there was an increased disproportionate environmental health or safety risk to children. Affected Environment 4.3.1.1 Population The 2013 population of Letcher County was 24,025. Letcher County’s population decreased by approximately 3 percent between 2000 and 2010 (Table 4-1). The City of Whitesburg grew by approximately 34 percent from 2000 to 2010 and the City of Jenkins population decreased by 3 percent during the same time period. The decrease in population is likely the result of people who leave the area for better education and employment opportunities (Kentucky River Area Development District [KRADD] 2013). This trend is anticipated to continue within the county with the population decreasing by an additional 7 percent by the year 2020. Table 4-1. Study Area Population Trends, 2000–2010 Geographic Area 2000 2010 Percent Change 2000–2010 Whitesburg, Kentucky 1,598 2,139 33.85 --- --- Jenkins, Kentucky 2,273 2,203 -3.08 --- --- Letcher County, Kentucky 25,275 24,519 -2.99 22,655 -6.88 4,041,769 4,339,357 7.36 4,699,880 8.3 Kentucky 2020 Projected Population* Projected Percent Change 2010–2020 Note: *2020 Projections only available for county and state. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2000, U.S. Census Bureau 2010, Proximity One 2014. 4.3.1.2 Employment and Income Letcher County’s 2013 employed civilian labor force was 7,103, out of a total civilian labor force of 8,201. Employment by industry in Letcher County is depicted in Table 4-2. The industries that employ the greatest number of people in Letcher County include educational services, and health care and social assistance (33.4 percent); agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining (13.0 percent); and retail trade (12.7 percent). In Kentucky, the largest industry employers are educational services, and health care and social assistance (24.5 percent); manufacturing (13.7 percent); and retail trade (11.8 percent) (U.S. Census Bureau 2014a). Letcher County is part of the largest coal producing area in eastern Kentucky. While study area jobs in the coal mining industry have been declining, positions in the health care, retail, and the secondary wood industries have increased. However, these jobs typically pay less than coal mining jobs. The study area is part of a region characterized by high unemployment and poverty rates (KRADD 2013). 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 4-2. Study Area Employment, 2013 Industry Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation and warehousing, and utilities Information Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental/leasing Professional, scientific, management, and administrative and waste management services Educational services, health care and social assistance Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food services Other services, except public administration Public administration Total Letcher County, Kentucky Number Percent Employed Employed Kentucky Number Percent Employed Employed 922 13.0 52,348 2.8 442 213 209 904 6.2 3.0 2.9 12.7 111,646 255,938 49,171 219,721 6.0 13.7 2.6 11.8 360 5.1 112,005 6.0 98 1.4 29,217 1.6 199 2.8 102,380 5.5 413 5.8 144,589 7.8 2,369 33.4 456,293 24.5 468 6.6 159,679 8.6 252 3.5 87,228 4.7 254 7,103 3.6 85,390 1,865,605 4.6 Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014a. While unemployment rates in Kentucky have decreased from a peak of 10.3 percent in 2009 to 6.5 percent in 2014, the unemployment rate in Letcher County increased dramatically from 10.6 percent in 2009 to 17.3 percent in 2013 (Table 4-3). The preliminary 2014 unemployment rate for Letcher County has decreased to 11.5 percent. The comparable rate for the U.S. was 6.3 percent (Kentucky Labor Market Information [KYLMI] 2014). Unemployment rates in the study area are higher than the comparable rates for the state and the nation. Along with the “displaced worker,” the study area has a higher percentage of “discouraged” workers who no longer actively seek employment and are, therefore, not included in the official unemployment statistics. Therefore, the official unemployment rate in the study area is deceptively lower than actual unemployment (KRADD 2013). Table 4-3. Study Area Percent Unemployment Rates Jurisdiction Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky 2007 7.7 5.6 2008 7.1 6.6 2009 10.6 10.3 2010 11.4 10.2 Notes: Unemployment rates are not seasonally adjusted. aAugust 2014, preliminary. Source: KYLMI 2014. 2011 10.3 9.5 2012 13.8 8.3 2013 17.3 8.3 2014a 11.5 6.5 Total personal income includes net earnings by place of residence; dividends, interest, and rent received; and benefits paid by federal, state, and local governments and businesses. A larger portion of personal income in Letcher County comes from government and business benefits than for Kentucky and the U.S (U.S. Department of Commerce 2014). 4-6 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Total personal income in Letcher County decreased by almost 2 percent from 2010 to 2012, while over the same period, personal income increased by approximately 10 percent in Kentucky (Table 4-4). Between 2010 and 2012, per capita income increased in Letcher County by less than 1 percent while per capita income in Kentucky increased by 8 percent. The national per capita income was $43,735 (U.S. Department of Commerce 2014). Table 4-4. Study Area Personal and Per Capita Income Jurisdiction Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky 2010 Personal Income (000)a 2012 Personal Income (000)a Percent Change 2010–2012 2010 Per Capita Income 2012 Per Capita Income Percent Change 2010–2012 $686,680 $674,369 -1.8 $27,948 $28,155 0.7 $143,210,961 $157,043,042 9.7 $32,947 $35,643 8.2 Notes: Not adjusted for inflation. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce 2014. 4.3.1.3 Housing There were 11,519 housing units in Letcher County in 2013, with a total vacancy rate of approximately 19 percent (Table 4-5). The vacancy rate for owner-occupied units was 0.3 percent and the vacancy rate for rental units was 1.9 percent. The comparable vacancy rates in Kentucky were higher, at 12.4 percent, 2.1 percent, and 6.7 percent respectively (U.S. Census Bureau 2014b). Table 4-5. Study Area Housing Units, 2013 Geographic Area Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014b. 4.3.1.4 Vacant Housing Units Housing Units 11,519 2,155 1,933,019 239,620 Percent Vacant 18.7 12.4 Homeowner Vacancy Rate 0.3 2.1 Rental Vacancy Rate 1.9 6.7 Environmental Justice For the purpose of this evaluation, minority refers to people who identified themselves in the census as Black or African American, Asian, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaskan Native, other non-White races, or as being of Hispanic or Latino origin. Persons of Hispanic and Latino origin may be of any race (CEQ 1997). The CEQ identifies these groups as minority populations when either (1) the minority population of the affected area exceeds 50 percent or (2) the minority population percentage in the affected area is meaningfully greater than the minority population percentage in the general population or the geographic region of comparison (most often the state in which the affected area is part). The geographical unit for comparison in this analysis is Kentucky. U.S. Census Bureau data on the racial and ethnic composition of the study area in 2013 are summarized in Table 4-6. Overall, the majority of the study area is white. Letcher County has a smaller percentage of minority and Hispanic populations than Kentucky. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-7 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 4-6. Study Area Percent Race and Ethnicity, 2013 Jurisdiction Whitesburg, Kentucky Jenkins, Kentucky Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky White 97.1 98.4 98.3 87.8 Black/African American 1.5 0.5 0.2 7.9 American Indian/Alaska Native 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 Asian 0.6 0.0 0.6 1.2 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hispanic or Latino Origina 1.3 0.9 0.7 3.2 Notes: Data presented reflects most reported race and ethnicity categories; percentages may not add to 100 percent due to rounding. *Hispanic origin may be of any race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014c. Table 4-7 presents data on low-income families and individuals in the study area. The percentages of low-income families and individuals in Letcher County with incomes below poverty level (based on family size and composition) are greater than for Kentucky. In the study area, the City of Jenkins has the highest percentages of families and individuals with incomes below the poverty level. Table 4-7. Study Area Percent Below Poverty Level, 2013 Jurisdiction Whitesburg, Kentucky Jenkins, Kentucky Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014a. 4.3.1.5 Families Below Poverty Level 5.5 27.6 20.0 14.6 Individuals Below Poverty Level 14.2 32.1 24.2 19.1 Protection of Children The percentage of children under the age of 18 is lower in Whitesburg, Jenkins, and Letcher County than for Kentucky (Table 4-8). Table 4-8. Study Area Percent Under the Age of 18, 2013 Jurisdiction Whitesburg, Kentucky Jenkins, Kentucky Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014c. <18 16.4 20.8 22.3 23.3 Environmental Consequences 4.3.2.1 Population Approximately 300 new employees would be needed to operate the proposed USP and FPC. It is anticipated that some of these employees would be existing Bureau employees who would relocate to the area and the rest would be hired locally. Under a maximum case scenario, all 300 new personnel are assumed to move to the study area. The Bureau personnel would likely be accompanied by their families or other household members. The U.S. Census Bureau has determined that the average household size for the U.S., which is assumed to be similar to the average household size of transfer employees, is 2.58 (U.S. Census Bureau 2010). Under this assumption, approximately 774 people would be added to the study area population. This would represent 3.2 percent of the Letcher County 2013 population. This gain would help to offset some of the 4-8 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky recent and projected population losses in Letcher County. Alternative 1 would result in a minor beneficial impact to the study area’s short- and long-term population trends. 4.3.2.2 Employment and Income The increase of 300 full-time positions would represent approximately 4 percent of the Letcher County 2013 civilian labor force. Study area personal income would also increase as a result of job growth. Some of the increased wage earnings would be paid to taxes, and some would be saved and invested, but most would be spent on consumer goods and services in the study area. This spending would, in turn, “ripple” through the economy, generating additional indirect jobs and income and benefitting the study area economy. Given the rate of unemployment in the study area (11.5 percent), it would be expected that many of these indirect positions would be filled by unemployed local residents. In addition, inmates’ family members would be expected to visit, boosting visitor spending in hotels/motels and restaurants in the study area. No population in-migration to the study area would be expected as a result of indirect job growth. The increase in construction spending would also generate direct construction jobs and indirect jobs, typically in food services and retail trade. Additional construction workers may move into the study area in response to the direct construction jobs, but these workers would most likely leave the area for other opportunities when the construction project nears completion. Further, given the study area unemployment rate, it would be expected that most of the indirect positions would be filled by unemployed study area workers. While there may be some population in-migration to the study area as a result of construction spending, it would not be expected to significantly affect population trends. Alternative 1 would result in beneficial employment and income impacts in the study area. While the purchase of land by the Bureau for Alternative 1 would reduce property tax revenues, additional taxes would accrue to federal, state, and local governments as a result of the increase in payrolls, and operational and construction spending. It is anticipated that, on balance, the fiscal/economic impacts would be beneficial and there would be no significant adverse fiscal/economic impacts. 4.3.2.3 Housing Alternative 1 would result in an increase of 300 full-time positions in the study area. Under a conservative scenario, all these personnel would seek housing in Letcher County at the same time. This would represent about 2.6 percent of Letcher County’s total housing units and approximately 14 percent of the vacant units. Some additional housing may be developed by the private market to support USP and FPC employees who choose to live in Letcher County. However, not all new personnel would live in Letcher County and the increase in personnel would occur over the construction period before the USP and FPC become operational, reducing any potential negative impacts to the study area’s housing market. 4.3.2.4 Environmental Justice As set forth in the preceding assessment and discussion, the proposed facility at Payne Gap would be expected to result in minor beneficial economic impacts to the local population as well as beneficial employment and income impacts to the surrounding community. There are no adverse environmental impacts that would have disproportionately high or adverse environmental effects on minority or lowincome populations. Therefore, Alternative 1 would not result in significant adverse impacts to environmental justice communities. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-9 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4.3.2.5 Protection of Children There are no adverse environmental impacts that would result in disproportionate health or safety risks to children. Therefore, Alternative 1 would not result in significant adverse impacts to the health or safety of children. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the USP and FPC would not be constructed. As a result, there would be no potential for beneficial socioeconomic impacts such as new jobs and potential growth of business within the region. This could result in the sustained poor economic climate in the region. The No Action Alternative would not result in adverse impacts to environmental justice communities or children. Mitigation No adverse impacts to socioeconomics, environmental justice populations, or children would be expected; therefore, no mitigation would be warranted. COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES Affected Environment 4.4.1.1 Police Law enforcement servicing the area around and including the Payne Gap site includes the Fleming Neon Police Department, Jenkins Police Department, Letcher County Sheriff, and Kentucky State Police. The Fleming Neon Police Department has three full-time employees consisting of one police chief and two police officers, as well as one volunteer, who operate out of a single station in Fleming Neon. The station has three squad cars and provides service 24-hours a day, seven days a week (Fleming Neon Police Department 2013). The Jenkins Police Department has six full-time personnel consisting of one police chief, four police officers, and the Public Safety Director. The department is currently short staffed by one person. The police department operates out of one station in Jenkins. The station has eight squad cars and provides 24hour coverage (Jenkins Police Department 2013). The Letcher County Sheriff’s office is comprised of 13 full-time employees including 10 deputies and 3 dispatchers. The office operates 10 squad cars and is headquartered in Whitesburg. The office provides 24-hour coverage, seven days a week (Letcher County Sheriff 2013). The Kentucky State Police Post 13 operates out of Hazard, and covers five counties, including Letcher County. The Hazard Post currently has 39 state troopers, 18 dispatchers, 3 clerks, 1 custodian, 1 criminal analyst, and 1 arson specialist. They operate 39 squad cars, and have 8 to 10 spare squad cars available in the event one is needed (Kentucky State Police 2013). 4.4.1.2 Fire Fire departments that provide emergency services for the Payne Gap area include the Fleming Neon Fire Department, Jenkins Volunteer Fire Station, and Whitesburg Fire and Rescue. The Fleming Neon Fire Department has approximately 36 firefighters and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) at the Fleming Neon Volunteer Fire Station. Sixteen are paid, full-time employees and 20 are volunteers. The station has seven paramedics and eight EMTs. The department has a single station in Fleming Neon and a substation 4-10 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky in Whitesburg. The Fleming Neon Station has two fire engines, 10 ambulances, 1 tanker truck, 1 rescue truck, 1 dive trailer (for underwater rescue) and 1 all-terrain vehicle for search and rescue operations. Four ambulances run during the day and 1 run at night. Firefighters run 3 crews during the day and 1 crew at night. The station has mutual aid agreements with all the towns in Letcher County (Fleming Neon Fire Department 2013). The Jenkins Volunteer Fire Station consists of between 25 and 28 firefighters and three administrative personnel with two stations in Jenkins. All firefighters are volunteers and 5 of the firefighters are also EMTs. Equipment associated with the stations includes 2 fire engines, an 85-foot tower truck, a 65-foot ladder truck, a 2,500-gallon tanker truck, 1 heavy rescue truck, and 1 vehicle for personnel transport. The Jenkins Volunteer Fire Station has mutual aid agreements with all other stations in Letcher County (Jenkins Volunteer Fire Station 2013). Whitesburg Fire and Rescue consists of 30 firefighters: 25 volunteer and 5 paid. Five of the firefighters are EMTs. The station has five fire engines and a boom truck with a snorkel. Whitesburg Fire and Rescue has mutual aid agreements with the rest of Letcher County and is able to assist with emergencies throughout the county if dispatched (Whitesburg Fire and Rescue 2013). 4.4.1.3 Health Care Appalachian Regional Healthcare (ARH) serves over 350,000 residents in eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia. Their operations in Letcher County, Kentucky include the Whitesburg ARH Hospital, ARH Whitesburg Clinic, Jenkins ARH Family Care Center, Neon ARH Family Care Center, Whitesburg ARH Surgical Clinic, ARH Cardiology Associates-Whitesburg, and Whitesburg ARH Home Health Agency. Whitesburg ARH completed an $11 million renovation project in 2011 that included a 15,000 square foot addition to the facility that houses surgical, obstetric, and newborn patients. Renovations to the existing space included a complete remodel of the third floor to include six Intensive Care Unit beds and 20 private patient rooms. Whitesburg ARH Hospital provides 24-hour emergency service for both adult and pediatric patients and has an on-site heliport for receiving and transferring patients. Whitesburg ARH is an acute care hospital that covers internal medicine, family practice, pediatrics, general surgery, advanced laparoscopic surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, cardiology, pulmonology, radiology and emergency services (ARH 2014). Mountain Comprehensive Health Corporation is one of the largest rural health centers in Kentucky. Its Whitesburg facility is the largest clinic, and offers dental, family and internal medicine, pediatrics, cardiology, pulmonology, and obstetrics and gynecological services, as well as a rehabilitation program. Mountain Comprehensive Health Corporation also has a full service laboratory (Mountain Comprehensive Health Corporation 2015). 4.4.1.4 Schools The schools in Letcher County are administered by the Letcher County School District. There are five elementary schools, three middle schools, and one high school. Table 4-9 identifies the names of the schools, the grades they serve, the number of students enrolled for the 2014–2015 school year, and the actual capacity of each school. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-11 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 4-9. Letcher County Schools Enrollment and Capacity for 2014–2015 School Arlie Boggs Elementary Cowan Elementary Fleming Neon Middle School Letcher County Elementary Letcher County Middle School Letcher County Central High School West Whitesburg Elementary School Whitesburg Middle School Martha Jane Potter Elementary Source: Wagoner 2014. Grades K-8 K-8 6-8 K-5 6-8 9-12 K-5 6-8 K-5 Number of Students 127 423 202 372 158 929 392 170 438 Capacity 248 440 352 418 225 1,033 440 225 425 Environmental Consequences 4.4.2.1 Police The vast majority of inmate incidents that would be likely to occur at the proposed USP would be addressed internally through Bureau disciplinary proceedings. However, to the extent that limited and infrequent response by state or local law enforcement is needed, law enforcement groups with jurisdiction over the Payne Gap site would be able to provide assistance in the event of an emergency that required assistance beyond the capabilities of the USP and other federal resources. The pertinent state and local law enforcement agencies have stated that they would be willing to discuss the development of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Bureau to provide these services. Further, they have indicated that no significant impacts to their services are expected as a result of the proposed facility. Therefore, Alternative 1 would have no adverse impacts to law enforcement resources. 4.4.2.2 Fire The proposed USP and FPC would have trained staff and fire-fighting equipment and resources capable of responding to and handling most fires or fire-related emergencies that would be likely to occur. However, to the extent that limited and infrequent response by outside fire or emergency resources would be needed, the local emergency service providers have indicated that they would be able to provide assistance in the event of an emergency that was beyond the capabilities of Bureau staff. These local providers have also indicated that providing such services, if requested, would not be expected to result in impacts to their services or require the hiring of additional staff (refer to communication logs in Appendix A, Agency Coordination). Therefore, Alternative 1 would not result in significant impacts to local fire and rescue services. 4.4.2.3 Health Care Bureau medical staff would be able to address most health care needs or emergencies that would arise at the proposed USP and FPC. However, health care facilities are located near the Payne Gap site and would be able to accommodate inmates at the proposed USP and FPC if needed. Discussions with ARH indicate they have staff familiar with accommodating inmates and the necessary security requirements that would need to be implemented to bring an inmate into an ARH facility. ARH indicated this would not be a problem and they would be able to accommodate the facility if an inmate would require care outside of the USP or FPC. ARH also indicated they would be willing to work with the Bureau to develop an MOU (Sparkman 2014). Therefore, there would be no adverse impact to health care services under Alternative 1. 4-12 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4.4.2.4 Schools Approximately 300 new employees would be needed to operate the proposed USP and FPC. It is anticipated that some of these employees would be existing Bureau employees that would relocate to the area. Under a maximum case scenario, it is assumed Bureau employees relocating to operate the facility would reside within the immediate area (Whitesburg, Jenkins, or Letcher County). With the exception of Martha Jane Potter Elementary school, all the schools within Letcher County School District have sufficient capacity to accept new students. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the USP and FPC would not be constructed. Community facilities and services would continue to operate under existing conditions. Law enforcement, emergency services, and health care providers within the area would not be asked to support the facility in emergency situations; therefore, no impacts to these services would occur. Mitigation Alternative 1 would have no significant impacts to community facilities and services; therefore, no mitigation would be required. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC The analysis of transportation and traffic describes both personal and public vehicle movement throughout a road and highway network. The study area for transportation and traffic includes the road and highway networks that surround and provide access to the proposed site parcels. Rural collector roads are divided into major and minor collector roads. Major collector roads are used for inter-county travel or for carrying vehicles to routes of higher classification (principal arterials and minor arterials) (Division of Planning 2011). Minor collector roads collect traffic from local roads and carry it to major collector roads, minor arterial roads, and/or principal arterials. Rural principal arterials are those roadways that have continuous routes that lend themselves to statewide or interstate travel and typically have limited access (Division of Planning 2011). Affected Environment The Payne Gap site is located approximately 7 miles northeast of Whitesburg. This project alternative would be constructed to the south of U.S. Route 119, to the east of Bottom Fork Road (KY 3406), and to the west of Talman Drive. In the project vicinity, U.S. Route 119 is designated as a rural principal arterial on the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet’s (KYTC’s) statewide map of roadway functional classifications (KYTC 2014a). KYTC traffic count station 272 is located on U.S. Route 119 approximately 0.5 miles west of the site. The year 2010 Annual Average Daily Traffic volume at this location was 6,778 vehicles per day (KYTC 2014b). The Payne Gap site has several access options. These include driveways onto Bottom Fork Road, U.S. Route 119, Talman Drive, and a connection to Fork Drive, which is an existing roadway that extends southward from U.S. Route 119. As defined by KYTC, rural principal arterials “comprise a system of continuous, connected, rural routes having trip length and density suitable for statewide or interstate travel. They provide for movement between all urban areas with a population of 50,000 or more and most urban areas with a population of at least 25,000” (KYTC 2014a). 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-13 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky A traffic impact study for the Payne Gap site was prepared and concurrence on the results of the study was received from the KYTC Central Office on April 30, 2015 and from the KYTC District 12 Office on May 4, 2015 (Appendix A, Agency Coordination). The study identified that U.S. Route 119 is currently operating at LOS A during both a.m. and p.m. peak periods (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., respectively) (Parsons 2015). Environmental Consequences 4.5.2.1 Construction Implementation of Alternative 1 would involve temporary traffic impacts resulting from construction activities. The following types of additional trips are expected to be added to the highway network: • • • Construction worker commuting trips Trips involving the delivery and removal of construction equipment and materials Trips involving the removal of demolition debris and/or excess fill material These trips would be temporary, and would not continue after the completion of project construction. Whereas construction worker commuter trips are expected to be concentrated during the traditional peak commuting periods, other trips would likely be dispersed throughout the typical working day. Trucks would be used to deliver/remove construction equipment and materials and to remove demolition debris and/or excess fill material during construction. Because of their size and weight, trucks have a relatively greater impact on street capacity and pavement conditions, as compared to passenger cars. Given the temporary nature of construction truck traffic, and given that trucks are not expected to be concentrated in peak commuting periods, the potential impact to roadway capacity would be less than significant. The potential impact to roadway wear and tear would be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of the mitigation described below in Section 4.5.4, Mitigation. With implementation of this measure, the addition of construction-related trips is not expected to result in a significant traffic-related impact. 4.5.2.2 Operations Following construction, the proposed federal correctional facility would add traffic to the surrounding street network on a recurring basis. This traffic increase would include employee commuting trips plus additional trips (such as the transfer of inmates, inmate visitors, delivery of supplies and equipment, etc.) that would not necessarily coincide with peak commuting periods. As discussed in Section 1.6, Proposed Action, the proposed facility would have a staff of 300 full-time employees. The proposed action’s traffic generation was estimated using trip generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (ITE 2012). Table 4-10 presents peak hour traffic generation. As shown in this table, the proposed facility would add approximately 156 trips during the morning peak hour and 204 trips during the afternoon peak hour. Table 4-10. Estimated Peak Hour Trip Generation In 97 A.M. Peak Hour Trips Out 59 Total 156 In 55 P.M. Peak Hour Trips Out 149 Total 204 Note:(a) Land use and trip rates from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition (ITE 2012) for Land Use 571 (Prison). Source: Parsons 2015. 4-14 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky It is anticipated that a higher number of trips are expected to be generated in the p.m. peak period based on the previous studies performed and documented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual of traffic patterns associated with a federal correctional facility (Parsons 2015). Additional trips to/from the site are expected to occur during off-peak hour commuting periods. These off-peak trips may include the transfer of inmates, inmate visitors, and delivery of supplies and equipment. Based on the relatively low traffic volumes on U.S. Route 119, there is no anticipated impact associated with these off-peak trips. The traffic impact analysis determined that with the additional peak hour trips, U.S. Route 119 would continue to operate at a LOS A during both a.m. and p.m. peak periods. The study also found that the intersection of U.S. Route 119 and the entrance to the facility would operate at LOS A for westbound traffic during both a.m. and p.m. peak periods and LOS B for northbound traffic during the same peak periods (Parsons 2015). Appendix F contains the traffic impact study and Appendix A contains the email communications with KYTC regarding the traffic impact study. These potential impacts would be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of the mitigation described below in Section 4.5.4, Mitigation. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the USP and FPC would not be constructed and increases in traffic to area roadways would not occur. It is anticipated that traffic would remain close to existing conditions; therefore, no impacts to transportation or traffic would occur. Mitigation Although there are no significant impacts to traffic outlined in the traffic impact study, KYTC has recommended that consideration be given to constructing a left turn lane on U.S. Route 119 for vehicles traveling westbound. The left turn lane would minimize the potential for rear-end vehicle collisions. AIR QUALITY The air quality analysis evaluates projected future emissions, including construction and operations. Air quality impacts would be significant if emissions associated with the proposed action would: 1) increase ambient air pollution concentrations above the NAAQS, 2) impair visibility within federally mandated Prevention of Significant Deterioration Class I areas, 3) result in the potential for any stationary source to be considered a major source of emissions if total emissions of any pollutant subject to regulation under the CAA is greater than 250 tons per year (TPY) for attainment areas, or 4) for mobile source emissions, result in an increase in emissions to exceed 250 TPY for any pollutant. The air quality assumptions and calculations are provided in Appendix C, Air Emissions Calculations. Pollutants considered in this analysis include the criteria pollutants. Airborne lead is classified as a criteria pollutant. The only possible source of lead associated with the proposed action is from weapon firing at the outdoor firing range. The potential emission of airborne lead particles from weapon firing is a general environmental issue and the impacted media are water and soil. Issues regarding lead contamination are covered under the hazardous waste regulations established under the CWA, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; therefore, potential impacts of lead contamination are discussed in Sections 4.12.2.2 and 5.12.2.2, Hazardous Wastes. There is also the potential for human exposure due to the proximity of the weapon firing to the breathing zone of the weapon user and instructor, which would be regulated under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. As such, airborne emissions of lead are not relevant to ambient air 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-15 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky quality and the NAAQS established as part of the CAA. Therefore, lead emissions are not carried forward in the criteria pollutant analysis. For criteria pollutant emissions, 250 TPY per pollutant was used as a comparative analysis threshold. This value is used by the USEPA in their New Source Review standards as an indicator for impact analysis for listed new major stationary sources in attainment areas. No similar regulatory threshold is available for mobile source emissions, which are the primary sources for the construction phases, and also a component of operational emissions for the proposed action. Lacking any mobile source emissions thresholds, the 250 TPY major stationary source threshold was used to equitably assess and compare mobile source emissions. Pollutants would be generated by numerous sources, including diesel exhaust from construction equipment, gasoline exhaust from employee commuting trips, and operations such as generators and boilers. In general, volatile organic compound (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (NOx), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions would be primarily generated by diesel-fueled heavy equipment operating in construction areas. Particulate matter (PM) emissions, in the form of PM10 and PM2.5, would be primarily due to fugitive dust created by land disturbance activities, which would include land clearing; soil excavation, cutting, and filling; and grading. The fugitive dust emission factor for PM10, which is used as part of the PM2.5 calculation (Midwest Research Institute 2005), is assumed to include the effects of typical control measures such as routine site watering and other measures for dust control. A dust control effectiveness of 50 percent is assumed, based on the estimated control effectiveness of watering (Western Governors’ Association 2006). Other sources of emissions include diesel emissions from heavy construction equipment. Refer to Appendix C, Air Emissions Calculations, for further discussion of the technical approach and assumptions. Air emissions were analyzed, where applicable, based on proposed construction activities and on operational emissions that would occur during full operation. Under the CAA, motor vehicles and construction equipment are exempt from air permitting requirements. Since the emissions from these sources associated with the proposed action would occur in areas that are in attainment of the NAAQS for all criteria pollutants, the General Conformity Rule is not applicable. Nonetheless, NEPA and its implementing regulations require analysis of the significance of air quality impacts from these sources as well as non-major stationary sources. However, neither NEPA nor its implementing regulations have established criteria for determining the significance of air quality impacts from such sources in CAA attainment areas. As noted above, the General Conformity Rule is not applicable to these mobile sources and minor (i.e., non-major) stationary sources in attainment areas. Therefore, the analysis of construction and operational incremental emissions from these sources in attainment areas and the significance criteria selected (250 TPY) are solely for the purpose of informing the public and decision makers about the relative air quality impacts from the proposed action under NEPA requirements. Affected Environment The study area for the air quality analysis includes the Appalachian Intrastate Air Quality Control Region, which is defined in 40 CFR 81.191, and comprises several counties in Kentucky, including Letcher County. Air quality in the study area is considered good, with the study area designated as unclassifiable, attainment, or better than national standards for all criteria pollutants. Because the study area is in 4-16 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky attainment for all criteria pollutants, the CAA General Conformity Rule does not apply and is not addressed in this analysis. Although a conformity analysis is not required, impacts to air quality from emissions associated with construction and operations are addressed in Sections 4.6.2 and 5.6.2, Environmental Consequences. Environmental Consequences The results of the air emissions analysis show that construction and operational emissions under Alternative 1 would remain well below the significance thresholds and would not have a significant impact on the local or regional air quality. A summary of the analysis is presented below and the complete analysis is provided in Appendix C, Air Emissions Calculations. 4.6.2.1 Construction Direct impacts from emissions from construction would include combustion emissions from fossil fuelpowered equipment and fugitive dust emissions (PM10 and PM2.5) during clearing, demolition activities, earth moving activities, and operation of equipment on bare soil. Table 4-11 presents estimates for the primary construction activities that would utilize heavy duty diesel equipment for the Payne Gap site. Table 4-11. Construction Emission Estimates for Payne Gap Site Site Payne Gap Payne Gap Year 1 2 VOC Tons 7.80 7.80 CO Tons 32.35 32.35 NOx Tons 108.53 108.53 SO2 Tons 1.90 1.90 PM10 Tons 217.59 147.09 PM2.5 Tons 27.05 20.00 Fugitive dust from land disturbance activities would be the primary source of emissions during construction, with most of the emissions occurring during Year 1. PM10 emissions are estimated using wetting and other typical reduction practices to reduce dust release by 50 percent. PM10 emissions are predicted to be greatest in Year 1 at the Payne Gap site, at 217.59 TPY. These emissions, however, would remain well below the significance threshold of 250 TPY. Construction emissions would not have direct or indirect significant impacts on the region’s air quality. Direct impacts to air quality may also include emissions from the burning of construction debris, if such an activity were undertaken during construction. Vegetative debris and/or demolition and construction materials would be disposed in accordance with all laws and regulations. Should open burning be necessary, it would be conducted in accordance with Title 401 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations (KAR), Chapter 63, Section 5 (401 KAR 63:005), Open Burning. 4.6.2.2 Operations Table 4-12 presents the annual emissions based on the site being fully operational. Operational emissions would be the same regardless of the location selected. Stationary sources operating on-site include two 2000-kilowatt diesel-powered emergency generators and three boilers to provide heat and hot water for the site. The boilers have been estimated at 15 MMBtu/hr. One of the boilers would serve as a backup, so air emission calculations evaluated use of two boilers. All of these stationary sources would require an air permit and be regulated by the KDEP, Division for Air Quality. Analysis of permit requirements based on the final stationary source(s) type and design would be performed as design requirements are more fully delineated. This would ensure regulatory permit compliance and that all requisite source registrations would be submitted. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-17 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky In addition to stationary sources, the emissions from staff commuting to and from work have been estimated at 300 employees and working 365 days per year. The round trip was estimated at 40 miles because of the rural location of the Payne Gap site. Table 4-12. Estimated Annual Operational Emissions Source Generators Boilers Staff Vehicles Total VOC Tons/Year 0.25 0.26 0.19 0.70 CO Tons/year 2.15 3.80 23.38 29.33 NOx Tons/ Year 5.09 15.2 1.07 21.36 SO2 Tons/Year 0.00 0.16 0.02 0.18 PM10 Tons/Year 0.27 0.76 0.12 1.16 PM2.5 Tons/Year 0.27 0.19 0.11 0.58 All of the criteria pollutant emissions remain well below the significance threshold of 250 TPY. Based on the emission estimates, operation of the federal correctional facility at the Payne Gap site would not have direct or indirect significant impacts on the local or regional air quality. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the USP and FPC would not be constructed in Letcher County. The No Action Alternative would not result in emissions of any air pollutants. Therefore, there would be no impact to regional air quality. Mitigation Best management practices would be implemented to reduce air emissions. They may include, but are not limited to: • • • • Periodic wetting during clearing, excavation, filling, and grading activities to minimize impacts to air quality (PM10 emissions) from fugitive dust Utilization of alternatively fueled equipment Utilization of other emission controls that are applicable to the equipment being used on-site Reduction of idling time of equipment and construction vehicles NOISE Affected Environment The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates noise impacts to workers and sets forth thresholds for a safe work environment. OSHA has set permissible noise exposure limits (codified in 29 CFR 1910.95[b]). Based on these limits, an employee should not be subjected to continuous noise exceeding 90 dBA for durations lasting more than 8 hours per day (Table 4-13). As the level increases, the allowed duration of noise decreases. The maximum limit is 115 dBA for duration of 15 minutes or less. OSHA standards are the best documented requirements in regards to long-term human noise exposure. In addition, OSHA standards state that exposure to impulsive or impact noise (loud, short duration sounds) is not to exceed 140 dB peak sound pressure level (OSHA 2013). 4-18 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 4-13. OSHA Permissible Noise Exposures Duration per Day (hours) 8 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 0.5 0.25 or less Source: 29 CFR 1910.95(b). Sound Level (dBA) 90 92 95 97 100 102 105 110 115 The Payne Gap site is located in a rural area with minimal noise. Areas of the site located immediately adjacent to U.S. Route 119 would experience some noise from traffic traveling through the area. There is nothing located on the site that currently generates noise. Environmental Consequences 4.7.2.1 Construction Construction activities under Alternative 1 would result in temporary, short-term increases in noise levels. Noise associated with construction equipment and vehicles, as well as blasting activities to remove bedrock, would occur during site preparation and construction. As stated in Section 4.7.1, Affected Environment, OSHA standards (29 CFR 1910.95) state that employees should not be subjected to continuous noise exceeding 90 dBA for durations lasting more than 8 hours per day. For the purposes of this analysis, noise at a sensitive receptor above the level for a residential district, 55 dBA, is noted for impacts, and noise emissions exceeding 90 dBA for more than 8 hours per day at a sensitive receptor location would be considered to have significant adverse impacts. A noise sensitive receptor is defined as a location or facility where people involved in indoor or outdoor activities may be subject to stress or considerable interference from noise. Such locations or facilities often include residential dwellings, hospitals, nursing homes, educational facilities, and libraries. Sensitive noise receptors may also include supporting habitat for certain wildlife species or noise sensitive cultural practices. Alternative 1 would generate noise during the construction phases of the USP and FPC. Phases of construction that would generate noise include: land clearing and excavations, pile driving, foundation and capping, erection of structural materials, and construction of exterior walls. Noise from construction equipment operating at the site, construction/delivery vehicles traveling to and from the site, and pile driving activities required for placement of deep pile foundations would impact noise levels. Noise levels at a given receptor location would depend on the type and number of pieces of construction equipment being operated and the receptor’s distance from the construction site. Construction related noise emissions are listed in Table 4-14 and can range from 74 to 101 dBA when measured 50 feet from the respective piece of equipment. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-19 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 4-14. Airborne Construction Related Noise Emissions Equipment Description Flat Bed Truck Welder/Torch Man Lift Dump Truck Backhoe Compressor (air) Concrete Mixer Truck Drill Rig Truck Front End Loader Rivet Buster/Chipping Gun Ventilation Fan Drum Mixer Vibratory Concrete Mixer Concrete Pump Truck Crane Generator Pumps Dozer Boring Jack Power Unit Warning Horn Auger Drill Rig Scraper Pneumatic Tools Vacuum Excavator Vibrating Hopper Jackhammer Concrete Saw Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram) Sheers (on backhoe) Impact Pile Driver Vibratory Pile Driver Source: Federal Highway Administration 2006. Actual Measured Lmax at 50 feet (dBA) 74 74 75 76 78 78 79 79 79 79 79 80 80 81 81 81 81 82 83 83 84 84 85 85 87 89 90 90 96 101 101 Small increases in noise levels would be expected as a result of the operation of delivery trucks and other construction vehicles. However, larger increases in noise levels would result if pile driving activities are necessary. Increased noise levels would be greatest during the early stages of each construction phase, although these periods would be of relatively short duration. However, under the worst case scenario during pile driving, there would be periods during construction when noise would range from 101 dBA at 50 feet from the equipment to 89 dBA at 200 feet from the equipment. The 200-foot radius from the equipment would encompass primarily rural undeveloped areas, depending on the location of the pile driving equipment at any given time on the Payne Gap site. Residences adjacent to the Payne Gap site are well over 200 feet from the majority of construction areas. When compared to the existing noise conditions at the Payne Gap site (35 dBA) and the OSHA noise thresholds for workers, the pile driving activities would result in significant short-term impacts to noise receptors located within 200 feet of the pile driving equipment location at the construction site, which would vary as the foundation piles would be driven throughout the foundation footprint. Moderate noise impacts would extend up to 1.5 miles from the construction site, as this is the distance at which noise levels would attenuate down to 55–60 dBA. 4-20 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky In conclusion, temporary and short-term noise disturbance would occur during construction; however, implementation of noise attenuation measures described below would reduce potential disturbance from noise. Therefore, implementation of Alternative 1 would have no significant impacts to sensitive noise receptors from noise. 4.7.2.2 Operations The operation of the proposed USP and FPC, once construction is completed, is not expected to significantly increase ambient noise levels. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the USP and FPC would not be constructed and no increases in noise as a result of construction or operation would occur. It is anticipated that the site would remain undeveloped; therefore, no increases in noise that my present impacts to nearby noise receptors would occur. Mitigation To minimize the impact to noise receptors during the operation of the pile driving equipment, a variety of measures would be taken, including but not limited to: • • • Using noise bellows systems to provide further noise attenuation Performing the work during daytime hours Scheduling the louder construction activities for less intrusive times (mid-morning to midafternoon) INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES Affected Environment 4.8.1.1 Potable Water Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, public water systems are required to regularly test produced water for more than 90 contaminants, such as bacteria, nitrates, and other chemicals. The KDEP Division of Water is responsible for protecting the public’s potable drinking water supply. Title 401 KAR Chapter 8 outlines the requirements for public water systems. This includes both treatment of water for distribution to the public, as well as quality assurance procedures. Under 401 KAR Chapter 8, public water suppliers must submit monthly reports to the Division of Water. A public water system must take corrective action and notify its customers when water samples exceed the limit for a contaminant. The Letcher County Water and Sewer District (LCWSD) purchases water from the City of Jenkins to distribute in the Payne Gap area. The Bureau reviewed the Consumer Confidence Reports (CCRs or Water Quality Reports) for the LCWSD and the City of Jenkins for the past three reporting years of 2012, 2013, and 2014. In 2014, the LCWSD had an issue for failing to submit reports to the drinking water database on time. A review of the CCRs for 2012, 2013 and 2014 for the Jenkins Water Treatment plant indicates some issues regarding the timely submission of regular monitoring reports, but no violations. The Jenkins Water Treatment plant is now in compliance. The Jenkins Water Treatment Plant has a current capacity of 83,520 gallons per day (Lewis 2015). The LCWSD has been extending its service area, including an area along U.S. Route 119, adjacent to the Payne Gap site. The water main at this location is 8 inches in diameter and has water pressure near the 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-21 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky connection point of approximately 110 pounds per square inch. Potable water would be provided by the LCWSD via a connection approximately 3.5 miles away from the Payne Gap site (Cardno 2014a). Because municipally supplied water in the city of Jenkins is drawn from surface waters of Jenkins Lake in the North Fork Kentucky River watershed, indirect impacts to public health have the potential to occur if drinking water quality were to be compromised by coal mining or other activities in the watershed (LCWSD 2014). The water supply would need be treated to meet drinking water standards prior to distribution to consumers. If drinking water standards cannot be met a public health advisory would be issued and consumers would be advised as to how to further treat the water at home (i.e., boiling) or a consumption ban would be implemented and consumers would be provided with bottled water (KDEP 2015). 4.8.1.2 Wastewater Sanitary sewer service would be provided by the City of Jenkins and treated at the Jenkins Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The nearest connection point is located at the Gateway Industrial Park in Jenkins, approximately 1.5 miles east of the Payne Gap site (Figure 4-2). The facility was designed to treat approximately 600,000 gallons per day and currently treats approximately 400,000 gallons per day (KRADD 2013). 4.8.1.3 Natural Gas There is one gas well located in the northeast corner of the Payne Gap site. In addition, there is also an aboveground 16-inch high pressure transmission line running directly through the property. The gas well and transmission line are both owned by EQT (Cardno 2014a). 4.8.1.4 Electricity American Electric Power (AEP) lines extend along U.S. Route 119 in the vicinity of the Payne Gap site and would be able to provide electricity to the Payne Gap site (Cardno 2014a). 4.8.1.5 Telecommunications Windstream provides telecommunications service in the area of Payne Gap with fiber and copper cables in the vicinity of U.S. Route 119. Windstream has sufficient capacity in this area to provide adequate service to the proposed Bureau facility (Cardno 2014a). 4.8.1.6 Solid Waste Solid waste generated within Letcher County is disposed of at the Laurel Ridge Landfill in London, Kentucky, approximately 90 miles west of Whitesburg (Laurel Ridge Landfill 2014). The Laurel Ridge Landfill has a maximum annual limit of 350,000 tons. The landfill currently receives approximately 320,000 tons annually. Based on their current capacity, the landfill has a 30-year life expectancy. Environmental Consequences 4.8.2.1 Potable Water The Bureau would purchase potable water from the LCWSD for the Payne Gap site under Alternative 1. CCRs for the LCWSD and the City of Jenkins for the past three reporting years did not indicate any violations for drinking water quality standards. Therefore, implementation of Alternative 1 would have no significant impacts to water quality. 4-22 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 4-2. Payne Gap Existing Utilities 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-23 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky The USP and FPC are anticipated to require 214 gallons per day per inmate. Based on an anticipated inmate population of 1,200, a total of 258,000 gallons per day would be required under the proposed action. Additionally, the utility plant, warehouses, and training building would require approximately 6,160 gallons per day. Therefore, operation of the proposed federal correctional facility would require approximately 264,000 gallons of potable water per day. The current capacity of the Jenkins Water Treatment Plant is 83,520 gallons per day. If the Bureau selects Alternative 1, modifications to the Jenkins Water Treatment Plant would be needed to meet the increased demand. Consequently, Alternative 1 would result in significant impacts to LCWSD’s potable water capacity. 4.8.2.2 Wastewater Average wastewater generated by the USP, FPC, and ancillary facilities is anticipated to be 224,000 gallons per day. This would result in the City of Jenkins WWTP exceeding their design capacity of 600,000 gallons per day by approximately 24,000 gallons per day. As a result, Alternative 1 would result in significant impacts to the City of Jenkins wastewater treatment capacity. 4.8.2.3 Natural Gas Implementation of the proposed action at the Payne Gap site would result in the closure and abandonment of a gas well and relocation of an aboveground natural gas pipeline. Closure of the gas well would result in lost natural gas production and profit to the owner of the well, EQT. Additionally, the relocation of the natural gas pipeline would result in a loss of transmission and resulting profit to EQT during the relocation process. EQT would also have to expend resources to relocate the gas line, as well as acquire right-of-way and permits to complete the relocation. Due to the location of the Jefferson National Forest to the south, the relocation of the line is limited to moving it to the north of its current location. As a result of the implementation of Alternative 1, significant impacts to natural gas infrastructure would occur. 4.8.2.4 Electricity In coordination with the electric service provider, AEP has indicated it has ample capacity to provide service to the federal correctional facility. AEP would extend overhead lines to a predetermined handoff point to the secure facility and the Bureau would extend the service on-site to the needed facilities (Cardno 2014a). There would be no charge to extend the overhead lines to the handoff point and no issues with capacity; therefore, no adverse impacts to electrical capacity would occur under Alternative 1. 4.8.2.5 Telecommunications Windstream has indicated that they have sufficient capacity to meet the needs of the proposed USP, FPC, and ancillary facilities at the Payne Gap site. The Bureau would be responsible for connecting the fiber cables at a splice location adjacent to the Payne Gap site, as well as connecting copper cables at the Gateway Industrial Park in Jenkins. Connection costs would be approximately $35,000. Under Alternative 1, there would be no significant impacts to telecommunications service. 4.8.2.6 Solid Waste The Bureau estimates that an inmate would generate 4 pounds of solid waste per day or 1,460 pounds per year. With an estimated 1,200 inmates, the proposed action would generate 4,800 pounds per day of solid waste, or 1,752,000 pounds per year (876 TPY). The solid waste generated at the federal correctional facility would increase the amount of solid waste taken to the Laurel Ridge Landfill from 320,000 TPY to 4-24 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 320,876 TPY. This increase would not result in the landfill going over its current yearly maximum intake of solid waste; therefore, there would be no adverse impacts to the Laurel Ridge Landfill from implementation of Alternative 1. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the USP and FPC would not be constructed and the Payne Gap site is anticipated to remain undeveloped. If the Payne Gap site is not developed, then there would be no requirement for additional utilities. Therefore, it is anticipated that utility usage would remain similar to existing usage. Mitigation Mitigation for impacts to wastewater treatment as a result of the implementation of the proposed action at the Payne Gap site would require either the upgrade of the existing City of Jenkins WWTP or the construction of a new WWTP closer to the Payne Gap site. Coordination with the City of Jenkins indicates there are two options to provide wastewater treatment to the Payne Gap site (Cardno 2014a). The Bureau would have to pay for these mitigation measures, which would total approximately $3,800,000. Mitigation for impacts to natural gas infrastructure at the Payne Gap site would require the Bureau to pay for the closure of the gas well and relocation of the natural gas pipeline. The cost of closing the gas well would be $850,000. Additionally, the aboveground gas line would require relocation off-site. It is anticipated that 9,000 linear feet of gas line would need to be relocated at a cost of $455 per linear foot (Cardno 2014a; see Appendix D, Enhanced Utility Report). This would result in a total cost for relocation of approximately $4,095,000. The Bureau would also have to pay a connection fee of $110,000. In addition to the relocation costs, it would take a minimum of two years to design, permit, and install the pressure main. The Bureau would also be required to assess the impacts of both the removal of the gas line and the relocation of the gas line, which could result in additional studies and mitigation (i.e., wetland delineation, cultural resource studies, threatened and endangered species). The gas well on the Payne Gap site would be permanently closed and abandoned and the gas line relocated according to standards required by federal and state regulations. Groundwater at the Payne Gap site would not be used for any purpose at the USP or FPC. CULTURAL RESOURCES An APE was defined to take into consideration both potential direct and indirect effects to cultural resources from implementation of the proposed action at the Payne Gap site. The APE for Alternative 1 includes the 753-acre (305-hectare) Payne Gap site and adjacent areas to the north (Figure 4-3). The APE extends beyond the north boundary of the Payne Gap site because of the potential for visual effects to any historic properties that may be present within the viewshed of the proposed federal correctional facility’s one- to four-story buildings. Effects to archaeological resources, however, would be limited to the 300acre (121-hectare) area within the APE where construction (direct ground disturbance) would occur. Affected Environment 4.9.1.1 Archaeological Resources The Payne Gap site has been subject to previous mining activities; however, the mining activities did not appear to extend to the entire site. Therefore, a Phase I Archaeological Survey was conducted in August 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-25 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2011 and an additional Phase I archaeological investigation was conducted in August 2014. The surveys included pedestrian traversal of transects across areas that were not too steep, surface survey in areas of high ground surface visibility, search of rocky outcrops for rockshelters and other cultural features, and limited subsurface testing of flatter ridgetop, ridgeline, and slope terraces. In addition, background research indicated that no previously identified archaeological sites were present at the proposed Payne Gap site. A total of 40 shovel test pits were excavated within the APE during both Phase I surveys. No artifacts and no prehistoric or historic archaeological sites eligible for listing on the NRHP were discovered. As a result of both surveys, no further work was recommended at the proposed Payne Gap site. Concurrence on the 2011 survey recommendation was received from the SHPO on January 24, 2012, and concurrence on the 2014 survey recommendation was received on December 22, 2014 (Appendix A, Agency Coordination). 4.9.1.2 Traditional Cultural Properties Under Section 106 of the NHPA, a federal agency is required to give consideration to issues of traditional religious or cultural areas concerning Native American groups. No TCPs have been identified within the APE for Alternative 1 based on there being no federally recognized tribes within Kentucky. 4.9.1.3 Architectural Resources Architectural surveys were conducted to identify historic properties in the Payne Gap site APE. The initial reconnaissance survey of the APE was conducted in May 2011. The survey recommended four architectural resources for further investigation to determine their eligibility for inclusion in the NRHP. Other architectural resources located in the APE were not associated with significant historical or architectural contexts of Letcher County and/or were in poor condition; therefore, they were not recommended for further work (TEC, Inc. 2011a). The Kentucky Heritage Council (KHC), the Kentucky SHPO, concurred with the reconnaissance survey recommendations (KHC 2011). An intensive level survey of the four architectural resources recommended for further investigation as a result of the reconnaissance survey was conducted in August 2013. The resources consist of two cemeteries (LR149 and LR150); a late-nineteenth century vernacular T-plan house (LR151); and an earlytwentieth century vernacular central passage, double pile house (LR188) (Figure 4-3; Table 4-15). 4-26 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 4-3. Architectural Resources Evaluated in the APE for Alternative 1 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-27 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 4-15. Architectural Resources in the Payne Gap Site APE Evaluated for NRHP Eligibility Site Number LR149 LR150 LR151 Property Name Laurel Fork Cemetery Wright Cemetery Samuel J. Wright House Year Built 1918–present 1863–1961 Ca. 1885 LR188 Holbrook-Craft House Ca. 1903–1914 Description Cemetery Private, family cemetery Vernacular T-plan residence Vernacular central passage, double pile house NRHP Eligibility Not Eligible Not Eligible Not Eligible Not Eligible Archival and historical research and detailed field survey were undertaken to evaluate the NRHP eligibility of each property. Based on the field and research data, the survey concluded that none of the resources are eligible because they do not meet the NRHP criteria for eligibility (Cardno 2014b). The KHC concurred that the resources are not eligible for the NRHP (KHC 2014) (Appendix A, Agency Coordination). Environmental Consequences The cultural resources surveys for the proposed action did not identify any archaeological sites or architectural resources eligible for inclusion in the NRHP in the APE for the Payne Gap site. Therefore, Alternative 1 would have no effect on NRHP-listed or eligible cultural resources. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the USP and FPC would not be constructed and the site would remain undeveloped and no potential impacts to cultural resources would occur. Mitigation Alternative 1 would have no impact to NRHP-listed or eligible cultural resources; therefore, no mitigation is required. WATER RESOURCES Affected Environment 4.10.1.1 Surface Water The U.S. is divided and sub-divided into successively smaller hydrologic units, which are classified into six levels: regions, sub-regions, basins, sub-basins, watersheds, and sub-watersheds. The Payne Gap site lies in the Ohio Region (Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 05); Kentucky-Licking Subregion (HUC 0510); the Kentucky River Basin (HUC 051002); and the North Fork Kentucky River Watershed (HUC 05100201) (USEPA 2013a). The Payne Gap site contains surface water features including headwater intermittent and perennial streams. Hydrology at the site has been highly disturbed by historic mining activities. None of the streams on the Payne Gap site have been assessed for state water quality standards (USEPA 2013a). There are no identified impaired waters or TMDLs for the Payne Gap site. The closest assessed water body to the Payne Gap site is Fish Pond, located north of the site, on the opposite side of U.S. Route 119. Fish Pond was determined to be good for secondary contact recreation water, warm water aquatic habitat, and cold water aquatic habitat (USEPA 2013a). 4-28 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Mining operations in the region have the potential to affect water quality of the North Fork Kentucky River Watershed. There are three active mining operations in the watershed. These mining operations have no direct impacts on water quality of the Payne Gap site due to their distance and hydrological separation from the site. 4.10.1.2 Wetlands Site-specific wetland data was collected through on-site field work, aerial photographs, topographic maps, National Wetland Inventory wetland maps, and Natural Resources Conservation Service soil surveys. Pursuant to EO 11990, Protection of Wetlands, Section 404 of the CWA, and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, an investigation was conducted to identify potential jurisdictional waters of the U.S. Wetlands in areas proposed to be impacted by the proposed action were delineated in May 2011. Proposed impact areas included excavation needed for construction, access roads (approximately 50 feet on either side of the existing access roads), and areas previously disturbed by past mining or gas line activities. Additional wetland delineation was conducted in 2014 based on the proposed conceptual layout. The 2011 and 2014 wetland delineations included jurisdictional waters of the U.S. and isolated wetlands that may be exempt from USACE jurisdiction but may be protected by the KDEP. These studies supplant the usage of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Wetland Mapper because it is believed they are significantly more accurate; however, NWI data was used for areas not delineated during fieldwork. The delineations identified approximately 2.84 acres (1.15 hectares) of wetlands within the proposed project area on the Payne Gap site. The majority of the wetlands are located immediately adjacent to an existing or historic road, which has impacted water movement in the area. The NWI does not depict any wetlands within or outside of the proposed project area. In addition, several intermittent, perennial, and ephemeral streams were delineated on site (TEC, Inc. 2011b; Cardno 2014c). Hydrology supporting the wetlands is a result of both groundwater and surface water, runoff, and direct precipitation. Dominant vegetation within the wetlands identified at the Payne Gap site consists of Eleocharis obtusa, common rush (Juncus effuses), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia), and sallow sedge (Carex lurida). Figure 4-4 depicts the wetlands and streams delineated within the Payne Gap site and Table 4-16 lists the acreages of wetlands by type and the linear feet of jurisdictional streams. Table 4-16. Wetland and Streams Delineated at Payne Gap Payne Gap Site Acres/Hectares Linear Feet Feature Type Wetlands Palustrine Emergent Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Palustrine Forested Streams Jurisdictional Stream Non-Jurisdictional Stream Note: N/A = Not Applicable. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Total 0.9/0.4 1.2/0.5 0.8/0.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.9/1.2 13,317 13,317 4-29 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 4-4. Payne Gap Wetlands and Streams 4-30 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4.10.1.3 Groundwater The Payne Gap site has two domestic single household drinking water wells located on the northern portion of the site. One well is at an elevation of 1,500 feet with water found at 60 feet below the surface. The second well is located at an elevation of 1,480 feet with water found at an elevation of 40 feet below the surface (KGS 2013). Groundwater flow tends to follow the sloped topography and is assumed to flow to the north, east, and west towards the North Fork Kentucky River, Cook Hollow, and Laurel Fork, respectively. Variations in groundwater conditions are expected based on location and elevation across the site, seasonal conditions, and weather patterns. The Payne Gap site is underlain by the Breathitt Group, which is composed of the Pikeville Formation and the Hyden Formation. The Breathitt Group yields more than 500 gallons per day in more than three-quarters of the wells drilled in valley bottoms, more than 500 gallons per day in about three-quarters of the wells on hillsides, and more than 100 gallons per day to nearly all wells on ridges within Letcher County (KGS 2013). There are no sole source aquifers underlying the site (USEPA 2013b). The quality of the groundwater in Letcher County ranges from moderately hard in most of the county to moderately soft south of Pine Mountain. Naturally occurring contaminants present in the groundwater consist of sulfate, salt (sodium chloride), iron, and manganese (KGS 2013). According to the Kentucky Division of Water, Groundwater Branch, Letcher County has areas of moderate and high sensitivity to groundwater pollution. The hydrogeologic sensitivity reflects the ease and speed with which a contaminant can move into and within a groundwater system. The hydrogeologic sensitivity of Letcher County has been assigned a value of three out of five, with five being the most susceptible to groundwater pollution and one being the least susceptible. The region is given a three due to subcutaneous drain and enlarged fractures influence groundwater recharge, fissure networks influence flow, and bidirectional dispersal patterns influence overall dispersion (KDEP 1994). 4.10.1.4 Floodplains The Payne Gap site is depicted on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 21133C00140C. The map indicates the Payne Gap site is not located in a 100-year floodplain (FEMA 2008). Environmental Consequences 4.10.2.1 Surface Water It is not anticipated that water quality of nearby streams and wetlands would be adversely impacted by on site construction. BMPs would be implemented based on an approved erosion and sediment control plan, which would minimize sediment and pollutants from the construction site being carried into nearby water courses. 4.10.2.2 Wetlands Implementation of Alternative 1 at the Payne Gap site would result in approximately 10,512 linear feet of stream impacts, 0.43 acres (0.17 hectares) of impacts to palustrine emergent wetlands, 0.76 acres (0.31 hectares) of impacts to palustrine forested wetlands, and 1.2 acres (0.49 hectares) of impacts to palustrine scrub-shrub wetlands. These impacts would be to the streams and wetlands delineated in 2011 and 2014 (refer to Table 4-16), and would result primarily from the excavation and grading activities that would be required to prepare the site for the development of the USP, FPC, ancillary buildings, and roads. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-31 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4.10.2.3 Groundwater The Bureau would prepare and implement a groundwater protection plan in accordance with Kentucky regulations (401 KAR 5:037) to protect groundwater quality during construction and operation of the federal correctional facility under Alternative 1. The site-specific groundwater protection plan would describe the activities that have the potential to pollute groundwater and include the measures and practices that will be implemented during construction and operation of the facility. Groundwater at the Payne Gap site would not be used for any purpose at the USP or FPC; therefore, there would be no human health impacts associated with groundwater use, nor would there be direct or indirect impacts to groundwater quantity. Therefore, construction and operation of the USP and FPC under Alternative 1 would have no significant impacts related to groundwater. 4.10.2.4 Floodplains The Payne Gap site is not located within a 100-year floodplain; therefore, no impacts to floodplains would occur under Alternative 1. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the Payne Gap site would not be developed and no impacts to surface waters or wetlands would occur. Mitigation The Bureau met with the USACE on May 19, 2015 to discuss mitigation related to wetland and stream impacts. Since the Payne Gap site is not the preferred alternative no mitigation would be warranted for the site at this time. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Affected Environment 4.11.1.1 Vegetation The Payne Gap site is dominated by mature hardwood second growth forest with herbaceous and scrub shrub vegetation in areas previously disturbed by historic strip mining activities and along the shoulders of the site access roads. Site observations indicate upland vegetation on the Payne Gap site includes American beech (Fagus grandifolia), tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera), northern red oak (Quercus rubra), sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), American elm (Ulmus americana), Allegheny blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis), autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), white clover (Trifolium repens), sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), and summer grape (Vitis aestivalis). Wetland vegetation includes American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), black willow (Salix nigra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), common rush, broadleaf cattail, fowl mannagrass (Glyceria striata), sallow sedge, and woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus). 4.11.1.2 Wildlife Non-avian species likely to be found on the Payne Gap site include coyote (Canis latrans), Virginia opossum (Dipelphis virginiana), American black bear (Ursus americanus), eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans), eastern spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius), white tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), green frog (Rana clamitans melanota), American toad (Bufo americanus), black rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta obsolete), copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix), eastern 4-32 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky hognose snake (Heterodon platirhinos), and fence lizard (Sceloporus undulates) (Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources 2013). A herd of eastern elk (Cervus elaphus) was observed on the Payne Gap site during a site visit. The MBTA is the primary legislation established to conserve migratory birds. The act prohibits taking, killing, or possessing migratory birds unless permitted by regulation. Representative migratory bird species potentially occurring in Letcher County and within the project area include tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), black-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus erythropthalmus), blue-winged warbler (Vermivora pinus), cerulean warbler (Dendroica cerulea), Kentucky warbler (Oporornis formosus), prairie warbler (Dendroica discolor), Swainson’s warbler (Limnothlypis swainsonii), worm eating warbler (Helmitheros vermivorum), fox sparrow (Passerella iliaca), wood thrush (Hylocichia mustelina), Louisiana waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla), least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus), rusty blackbird (Euphagus carolinus), willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii), loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), pied-billed grebe (Podilymbus podiceps), wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo), and short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) (USFWS 2015a). 4.11.1.3 Threatened and Endangered Species Due to the number of state-listed species listed by Kentucky as potentially occurring in Letcher County, the following section focuses on federally listed species. A full list of listed species and their status is included in Table 4-17. Table 4-17. State and Federal Report of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Plants, and Animals of Letcher County, Kentucky Scientific Name Liverworts Plagiochila caduciloba Mosses Anomodon rugelii Brachythecium populeum Cirriphyllum piliferum Dicranodontium asperulum Entodon brevisetus Neckera pennata Oncophorus raui Polytrichum pallidisetum Polytrichum strictum Sphagnum quinquefarium Vascular Plants Adlumia fungosa Angelica triquinata Baptisia tinctoria Botrychium matricariifolium Boykinia aconitifolia Carex aestivalis Carex appalachica Castanea pumila Circaea alpine Corydalis sempervirens 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Common Name Status (State/Federal) Gorge Leafy Liverwort E/N None Matted Feather Moss None None None None None A Hair Cap Moss None Five-ranked Bogmoss T/N E/N T/N E/N E/N T/N E/N T/N E/N E/N Allegheny-vine Filmy Angelica Yellow Wild Indigo Matricary Grape-fern Brook Saxifrage Summer Sedge Appalachian Sedge Allegheny Chinkapin Small Enchanter’s Nightshade Rock Harlequin H/N E/N T/N E/N E/N E/N T/N T/N S/N S/N 4-33 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 4-17. State and Federal Report of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Plants, and Animals of Letcher County, Kentucky Scientific Name Cymophyllus fraserianus Cypripedium parviflorum Eupatorium steelei Gentiana decora Hexastylis contracta Houstonia serpyllifolia Hydrophyllum virginianum Juglans cinerea Leucothoe recurve Lilium superbum Listera smallii Monotropsis odorata Oenothera oakesiana Oenothera perennis Orontium aquaticum Pogonia ophioglossoides Prosartes maculate Sanguisorba Canadensis Saxifraga michauxii Saxifraga micranthidifolia Solidago curtisii Trillium undulatum Terrestrial Snails Glyphyalinia rhoadsi Neohelix dentifera Patera panselenus Crustaceans Cambarus bunting Cambarus parvoculus Insects Amphiagrion saucium Calephelis borealis Erora laeta Litobrancha recurvate Papaipema speciosissima Phyciodes batesii Stylurus notatus Stylurus scudderi Fishes Chrosomus cumberlandensis Etheostoma sagitta spilotum Amphibians Cryptobranchus a. alleganiensis Plethodon wehrlei Birds Accipiter striatus Corvus corax Pheucticus ludovicianus Tyto alba Vermivora chrysoptera 4-34 Common Name Fraser’s Sedge Small Yellow Lady’s-slipper Steele’s Joe-pye-weed Showy Gentian Southern Heartleaf Michaux’s Bluets Eastern Waterleaf White Walnut Red-twig Doghobble Turk’s Cap Lily Kidney-leaf Twayblade Sweet Pinesap Evening Primrose Small Sundrops Golden Club Rose Pogonia Nodding Mandarin Canada Burnet Michaux’s Saxifrage Lettuce-leaf Saxifrage Curtis’ Goldenrod Painted Trillium Status (State/Federal) E/N T/N T/N S/N E/SOMC E/N T/N T/SOMC E/N T/N T/N T/SOMC H/N E/N T/N E/N S/N E/N T/N E/N S/N T/N Sculpted Glyph Big-tooth Whitelip Virginia Bladetooth T/N T/N S/N Longclaw Crayfish Mountain Midget Crayfish S/N T/N Eastern Red Damsel Northern Metalmark T Early Hairstreak A Burrowing Mayfly Osmunda Borer Moth Tawny Crescent Elusive Clubtail Zebra Clubtail E/N T/N T/N S/N E/N H/SOMC E/SOMC E/N Blackside Dace Kentucky Arrow Darter T/LT S/PT Eastern Hellbender Wehrle’s Salamander E/SOMC E/N Sharp-shinned Hawk Common Raven Rose-breasted Grosbeak Barn Owl Golden-winged Warbler S/N T/N S/N S/N T/SOMC 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 4-17. State and Federal Report of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Plants, and Animals of Letcher County, Kentucky Scientific Name Mammals Clethrionomys gapperi maurus Corynorhinus rafinesquii Mustela nivalis Myotis grisescens Myotis leibii Myotis septentrionalis Myotis sodalis Sorex cinereus Sorex dispar blitchi Spilogale putorius Ursus americanus Common Name Kentucky Red-backed Vole Rafinesque’s Big-eared Bat Least Weasel Gray Bat Eastern Small-footed Myotis Northern Long-Eared Bat Indiana Bat Cinereus Shrew Long-tailed Shrew Eastern Spotted Skunk American Black Bear Status (State/Federal) S/SOMC S/SOMC S/N T/E T/SOMC E/T E/E S/N E/N S/N S/N Notes: E = Endangered, H = Historical, LT = Listed as Threatened, N = None, PT = Proposed Threatened, S = Special Concern, SOMC = Species of Management Concern, T = Threatened. Sources: Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission 2014; USFWS 2014, 2015c, d. Based on coordination with the USFWS, four federally listed species have the potential to occur within the Payne Gap site: gray bat, Indiana bat, northern long-eared bat, and Kentucky arrow darter (USFWS 2014). The gray bat (Myotis grisescens) is federally listed as endangered and listed by Kentucky as threatened. The gray bat roosts in caves throughout the year although suitable caves are rare. For winter hibernacula the bats require vertical caves with domed halls. The winter caves must also have a temperature of between 6 and 11 degrees Celsius. Forested areas along the banks of streams and lakes provide important protection for adults and young. Summer caves are always within 1 kilometer (0.62 mile) of a river or reservoir where the bats forage. Forests provide important feeding areas for young bats, which will not forage in areas where the forests have been cleared (Natureserve 2013a). The Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) is federally and state-listed as endangered. The Indiana bat hibernates in caves; however, maternity sites are generally behind loose bark of dead or dying trees or in tree cavities. They forage in riparian areas, upland forests, ponds, and fields, but forested landscapes are the most important habitat. They typically hibernate in the coldest area of a cave to ensure a low enough metabolic rate in order to conserve fat reserves throughout the winter; however, they will move away from areas that dip below freezing. Known roost tree species include elm, oak, beech, hickory, maple, ash, sassafras, birch, sycamore, locust, aspen, cottonwood, pine, and hemlock with a preference for trees with exfoliating bark (Natureserve 2013b). The northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) was listed as threatened under the ESA in April 2015 and is listed by Kentucky as endangered (Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission 2014; USFWS 2015d). The northern long-eared bat hibernates in the small cracks and crevices of caves and mines that have large passages and relatively constant, cool temperatures with high humidity and no air currents. During the summer they roost singly or in colonies underneath bark or in cavities, crevices, or hollows of both live and dead trees within forests, woodlots with dense or loose aggregates of trees, riparian forests, and other wooded corridors. Males or non-reproductive females may also roost in caves or mines. In addition, northern long-eared bats have been observed roosting in structures such as barns and bridges. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-35 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky They are not considered to be a long-distance migrant, as they typically migrate 35–55 miles between their winter hibernacula and summer habitat (USFWS 2015b). A Phase I bat survey conducted in December 2014 confirmed the presence of both winter and summer habitat at the Payne Gap site (Copperhead Environmental Consulting 2015). In addition, one mine opening contained a torpid Indiana bat at its entrance. The USFWS concurred with the findings of the Phase I survey and indicated additional studies at the Payne Gap site would be required if this site were moved forward for development (Appendix A, Agency Coordination). The Kentucky arrow darter was proposed for listing as a threatened species under the ESA in September 2015 (USFWS 2015c). The Kentucky arrow darter is known to exist in the upper Kentucky River basin. Habitat for the species consists of pools and transitional areas between riffles and pools in moderate to high gradient streams (USFWS 2015c). The streams within the Payne Gap site are primarily small channels that do not contain riffle and pool complexes. There is no federally designated critical habitat on the Payne Gap site (USFWS 2013). Environmental Consequences 4.11.2.1 Vegetation Direct impacts to vegetation would occur under Alternative 1 as approximately 218 acres (88 hectares) of forested area would be cleared on the Payne Gap site for excavation and grading activities required to prepare the site for development. 4.11.2.2 Wildlife Wildlife species found on the Payne Gap site would likely be displaced during construction activities due to the loss of habitat and increases in noise. However, approximately 535 acres (217 hectares) of the site would remain undisturbed and continue to provide habitat, including breeding and foraging areas, for wildlife species found on-site. Additionally, the site is surrounded by similar habitat that could accommodate species that are displaced by construction activities. Based on the available habitat that would remain on site and habitat adjacent to the site (Jefferson National Forest), it is anticipated that these impacts would not adversely affect wildlife species that are currently present on-site. Use of the non-lethal/lethal fence has the potential to result in adverse impacts to small animals and avian species, should they pass through the outer fences and into the area of the non-lethal/lethal fence. 4.11.2.3 Threatened and Endangered Species Implementation of the proposed action at the Payne Gap site has the potential to impact the federally listed Indiana bat, gray bat, and northern long-eared bat. Approximately 218 acres (88 hectares) of summer roosting habitat would be impacted under Alternative 1. Additionally, based on the presence of mine openings and an Indiana bat, the USFWS requested additional studies be conducted at the Payne Gap site to further assess impacts if the proposed action were to be implemented at the site. These studies would include conducting spring or fall portal surveys on all suitable mine openings that may be either directly or indirectly impacted by the proposed action. Based on the Phase I survey and coordination with the USFWS, the Bureau determined Alternative 1 may affect, is likely to adversely affect the Indiana bat, gray bat, and northern long-eared bat and both their summer roosting habitat and winter hibernaculum. Adverse 4-36 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky effects to these bat species from nighttime light pollution and glare may also occur. Indirect impacts may come from the noise from the proposed outdoor firing range. It is not anticipated that the Kentucky arrow darter would be impacted by implementation of the proposed action at the Payne Gap site. The streams within the project site are small channels and do not contain riffle pool complexes. Additionally, conductivity measurements were taken within streams on the project site in June 2015. Conductivity measurements ranged from 562 microseconds (µS) to 1,970 µS. Studies have demonstrated that Kentucky arrow darters are not likely to be present when conductivity levels exceed approximately 250 µS (USFWS 2010). Therefore, no significant impacts to Kentucky arrow darter are anticipated under Alternative 1. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the Payne Gap site would not be developed and there would be no impacts to vegetation, wildlife, or threatened and endangered species. Mitigation Mitigation measures for construction impacts to vegetation and wildlife would include minimizing disturbance of existing vegetation to the greatest extent possible. An open area with a direct line of site is required for the areas surrounding the USP and FPC; however, upon completion of construction, disturbed areas would be re-vegetated with native, non-invasive plants to the maximum extent possible while maintaining the Bureau’s site requirements. The Bureau met with the USFWS on May 20, 2015 to discuss the Payne Gap site and potential additional studies and mitigation. If the site were to be developed, additional studies of winter hibernaculum would be required to further assess impacts and potential mitigation. The USFWS currently has a Conservation Memorandum of Agreement (CMOA) for impacts to summer habitat of 100 acres (40 hectares) or less. Impacts to summer habitat under Alternative 1, which would be greater than 100 acres, would not be covered under the CMOA; therefore, formal Section 7 consultation with the USFWS would be required for development of the Payne Gap site. Additional studies of summer and winter habitat and the preparation of a biological assessment addressing potential impacts to both summer roosting habitat and winter hibernacula would also be required. The USFWS would then issue a biological opinion on the findings of the biological assessment. Based on discussions with the USFWS, because Alternative 1 is not the preferred alternative and development of the Payne Gap site is not anticipated, no additional studies or coordination are required at this time (Appendix A, Agency Coordination). Should this change in the future, the Bureau would be required to notify the USFWS, conduct any required studies, and initiate formal Section 7 consultation, if necessary, prior to any development of the site. The Bureau has conducted prior impact assessments for the installation of non-lethal/lethal fences, especially for potential impacts to avian and small mammal species (Bureau 2009). These prior assessments have found less than significant adverse impacts; consequently, less than significant impacts are anticipated with the non-lethal/lethal fence to be installed as part of this proposed action. However, following activation of the non-lethal/lethal fence, the Bureau would monitor the fence line to determine if wildlife, particularly avian species, is being adversely affected. The Bureau would collect data regarding these occurrences including identification of species and photographs. The data would be used to document and analyze emerging trends. If adverse effects were identified, the Bureau would contact the 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-37 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky USFWS and appropriate state wildlife agencies to determine if changes to the operation of the fence are warranted. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE Affected Environment 4.12.1.1 Hazardous Materials The Payne Gap site is located in a relatively undeveloped area. No hazardous materials are known to be in storage or in use in this area. According to the USEPA “Cleanups In My Community” mapping tool, there are no Brownfield, Superfund, or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action sites in the vicinity of the Payne Gap site. No sites in the town of Payne Gap were listed in the USEPA’s Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), or RCRA databases. No hazardous materials or evidence of their presence (i.e., stressed vegetation, stained soils, drums) on the site were observed during site visits conducted by Cardno in 2011, 2013, and 2014. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed on the Payne Gap site in July 2015. The Environmental Site Assessment was conducted in accordance with the American Society for Materials and Testing International Designation: E1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM E1527-13). The goal of the assessment was to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) on the Payne Gap site. An REC is defined in ASTM E1527-13 as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” An REC includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. De minimis conditions are not RECs, generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment, and generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Structures on the Payne Gap site were also assessed for the potential presence of asbestos-containing material, lead-based paint, and radon, although no samples were collected during the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. As part of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, federal, state, and local databases were searched to meet, at a minimum, the government records search requirements of ASTM E1527-13. Only one of the numerous databases searched, the KY SPILLS database, contained information relevant to the Payne Gap site. The KY SPILLS database is a listing of spill and/or release related incidents. One incident, recorded in 2006, documents the reporting of fugitive emissions of dust from coal truck traffic in an area off of U.S. Route 119 halfway between Jenkins and Whitesburg in Bill Lewis Hollow. Based on the nature and location of the reported release, approximately 2 miles the east of the Payne Gap site, it is not considered to pose a threat of contaminating to the site. Visual inspections of the site and the adjoining properties (to the extent adjoining properties were accessible) were conducted to identify evidence of potential environmental contamination, such as: • stained surface soils or distressed vegetation; • disturbed surface soils or reclaimed areas; • discarded containers, residues, and pools of liquid; • electrical equipment such as transformers and capacitors; 4-38 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky • aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), underground storage tanks (USTs), piping, sumps, or other types of impoundment structures; • abandoned structures and associated utilities; and • drainage structures and direction of stormwater runoff on the subject parcels and adjacent areas. No RECs or hazardous materials were observed on the site. Appendix G contains the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Payne Gap site. 4.12.1.2 Hazardous Wastes No hazardous wastes are known to be stored on the Payne Gap site or generated in this area. According to the USEPA “Cleanups In My Community” mapping tool, there are no Brownfield, Superfund, or RCRA Corrective Action sites in the vicinity of the Payne Gap site. No sites in the town of Payne Gap were listed in the USEPA’s TSCA, TRI, or RCRA databases. No hazardous wastes or evidence of their presence (i.e., stressed vegetation, stained soils, drums, batteries) on the site and no evidence of acid mine drainage was observed during site visits conducted by Cardno in 2011, 2013, and 2014. No slurry ponds or coal mine waste facilities are located on or near the Payne Gap site (USEPA 2015a, USEPA 2015b, and Sierra Club 2015). The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment database search did not identify any hazardous waste sites or generators at or near the Payne Gap site. In addition, no hazardous wastes were observed on the site during the site inspections conducted in July 2015. Coal mining occurs in Letcher County; however, no active mining sites are located in the vicinity of the proposed Payne Gap site. Investigations using the Coal Impoundment Location and Information System (National Technology Transfer Center at Wheeling Jesuit University 2009) indicate that there are no active coal mines, coal processing facilities, or waste disposal sites on the Payne Gap site or within a 1-mile radius. Maps of active mines in Kentucky prepared by the Kentucky Department of Energy Development and Independence and the Kentucky Geological Survey were reviewed (KGS 2015) and cross referenced with maps prepared by the Kentucky Mine Mapping Information System to determine their current status. No currently active mines were found within a 1-mile radius of the proposed site. Therefore, coal mining in the area is not adversely affecting the environment of the site. 4.12.1.3 Toxic Substances During site inspections, remnants of a 75 foot by 35 foot warehouse type structure were observed. The structure was of concrete block construction with a concrete slab-on-grade floor and steel roof trusses. Based on review of historic aerial photos, the structure appears to have been constructed in the late 1990s. Therefore, it would not contain hazardous building materials, such as asbestos-containing material or leadbased paint. No toxic substances were observed on the site. Radon is a naturally occurring, colorless, odorless, radioactive gas produced by the decay of uranium in rock and soil. Radon is a known carcinogen, responsible for increasing the risk of lung cancer when inhaled. Electrically charged radon atoms can attach to indoor air dust particles. Subsequently these dust particles may be inhaled and adhere to the lining of the lungs. The deposited atoms decay by emitting radiation that has the potential to cause cellular damage. Typically outside air contains very low levels of radon (USEPA 2015c), but tends to accumulate in enclosed indoor spaces. When present, radon gas would 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-39 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky typically concentrate in relatively airtight buildings with little outside air exchange. The USEPA classifies Letcher County as having a moderate potential for radon intrusion (Zone 2). Zone 2 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level between 2 and 4 picocuries per liter (pCi/L). The USEPA action level for radon requiring treatment is 4 pCi/L. Environmental Consequences 4.12.2.1 Hazardous Materials Construction activities would require the use of hazardous materials. The majority of the hazardous materials expected to be used are common to construction and include diesel fuel, gasoline, and propane to fuel the construction equipment; hydraulic fluids, oils, and lubricants; and batteries. The transport and use of hazardous materials would have the potential to result in accidental spills that could adversely impact soil and groundwater on and adjacent to the construction site or along transportation routes. Hazardous materials associated with construction activities would be delivered and stored in a manner that would prevent these materials from leaking, spilling, and potentially polluting soils or groundwater, and in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental and public and occupational health and safety regulations. With the implementation of appropriate handling and management procedures, hazardous materials used during construction would have no significant impacts to the environment. 4.12.2.2 Hazardous Wastes Hazardous waste would be generated during construction activities and would include but not be limited to empty containers, spent solvents, waste oil, spill cleanup materials (if used), and lead-acid batteries from construction equipment. Construction contractors would be responsible for safely removing these construction-generated wastes from the construction site and for arranging for recycling or disposal in accordance with applicable regulations. The total monthly generation of hazardous waste during construction is anticipated to be less than 100 kilograms during a calendar month. The construction contractor would be responsible for determining their regulatory status regarding hazardous waste generation during construction, and obtaining and maintaining compliance in accordance with federal and state laws. Hazardous wastes associated with construction activities would be handled and stored in a manner that would minimize human exposure to these materials and prevent these materials from polluting soils or groundwater, and in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental and human health and safety regulations. Adherence to these policies, procedures, and regulations would minimize the potential impacts from exposure and accidental releases during construction. In the event of an accidental release, contaminated media would be treated on-site or would be promptly removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations. With the implementation of appropriate handling and management procedures, hazardous wastes generated during construction would have no significant impacts to the environment. Operation of the USP and FPC would require the use of small amounts of hazardous materials such as petroleum, oils, and lubricants for lawn maintenance equipment, pesticides, and paints. These materials would be acquired as needed and large volumes would not be stored on site. Those volumes that are stored on site would be stored, used, and disposed in accordance with applicable regulations and would have no significant impacts on the environment. The outdoor firing range at the proposed USP and FPC would be used an average of once a month for small arms training and maintenance, and would include the use of lead bullets. The range would be 4-40 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky designed according to Bureau Technical Design Guidelines, which require incorporating safety baffles, berms, and backstops to contain bullets to a designated area. Impoundments, traps, and other structures would catch lead particles. The design of the firing range would also include stormwater systems to gather runoff and allow infiltration within the range bermed area. This aids in preventing contamination outside of the range itself. To ensure this feature continues to work, regular range maintenance would include adding more soil to the berm and ensuring it is seeded with grass. If there is cause, the berm soil would be sifted to remove the lead. The lead would then be recycled and the soil replaced on the range berm. Bureau institutions with an active firing range use the web-based software TRI-Me to report releases of lead to USEPA. Therefore, firing range operations would have no significant impacts to the environment. 4.12.2.3 Toxic Substances Under Alternative 1, facilities intended for human occupancy would be designed to prevent occupant exposures to radon above the USEPA action level of 4 pCi/L. Therefore, there would not be adverse impacts associated with radon under Alternative 1. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the Payne Gap site would not be developed and there would be no impacts associated with hazardous materials and waste. Mitigation Alternative 1 would have no significant impacts to hazardous materials and wastes; therefore, no mitigation is required. 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 4-41 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) 4-42 4.0 Alternative 1 – Payne Gap March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 5.0 ALTERNATIVE 2 – ROXANA LAND USE AND ZONING Affected Environment Land use associated with the proposed location of Alternative 2 primarily consists of forest and reclaimed land from previous surface mining. Other on-site land uses include an agricultural field, a residential area, oil and gas wells, and a small model airplane airstrip. Land use surrounding the site is also primarily forested, with small single-family residences in the area. There are also several state parks and nature preserves within the area. They include Bad Branch Falls State Nature Preserve, Kingdom Come State Park, Lilley Cornett Woods, and Pine Mountain Wildlife Management Area. Coal mining once occurred throughout the area, but currently there are five active coal mining operations located between 1 and 6 miles from the Roxana site (Kentucky Mine Mapping Information System 2008). There are no zoning ordinances or land use classifications identified for this area (DePriest 2013). Land use associated with the Roxana site is depicted in Figure 5-1. Environmental Consequences 5.1.2.1 Construction Changes to land use on the 700-acre (283-hectare) Roxana site would occur from construction of a USP and FPC. Approximately 118 acres (48 hectares) of the site would be converted from a primarily forested area to a government institution consisting of several facilities, parking lots, and roads. Additionally, the model airplane strip would be removed. The oil and gas wells would be plugged and abandoned; these impacts are further discussed in Section 5.8, Infrastructure and Utilities. A buffer area would remain around the USP and FPC, separating the federal correctional facility from the adjacent properties. The buffer area would be compatible with the adjacent land uses. Due to the lack of zoning ordinances and land use classifications, construction of the proposed USP and FPC would not result in incompatible land uses from a regulatory perspective. 5.1.2.2 Operations There would be no impacts to adjacent land uses from operation of the USP and FPC, as the federal correctional facility would be separated from adjacent properties by a buffer area. The buffer area would be compatible with adjacent land uses. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.1.3. Mitigation Federal agencies are not subject to local/regional zoning or land use development regulations. However, the Bureau would take the following measures to help minimize potential adverse impacts to surrounding land uses: • • provide an open space and vegetative buffer between the USP and FPC to maintain visual compatibility with surrounding properties design and locate the facilities to reduce the visual presence of the facility from neighboring properties 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 5-1. Roxana Land Use 5-2 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND SOILS Affected Environment The topography at the Roxana site has been significantly impacted by mountaintop removal coal mining. A plateau resulting from surface mining has replaced a mountain ridge in the central portion of the site. This change has not been accounted for on USGS topographic maps; however, the highest point and lowest points of the site remain unchanged. The highest elevation is located in the southeastern portion of the site at an elevation of approximately 1,850 feet AMSL. The lowest elevation on site is approximately 1,035 feet AMSL, located in the northwestern portion of the site adjacent to the North Fork of the Kentucky River. The Roxana site is underlain by the Breathitt Group, which comprises the Pikeville Formation and the Hyden Formation. The Roxana site is also underlain by the Four Corners Formation. The geology underlying the Roxana site is primarily the Hyden Formation (KGS 2013). The three most common soils on the Roxana site are the Cloverlick-Kimper-Highsplint complex, (30 to 65 percent slopes), the Kaymine, Fairpoint and Fiveblock soils map unit (2 to 70 percent slopes), and the Shelocta-Highsplint (30 to 65 percent slopes). To a lesser degree the following soils are also on the site: Allegheny Loam (2 to 25 percent slopes), Dekalb-Gilpin-Rayne complex (25 to 65 percent slopes), Fiveblock and Kaymine soils (0 to 30 percent slopes), Gilpin-Shelocta complex (12 to 25 percent), Grigsby sandy loam (occasionally flooded), Grigsby-Urban land complex (0 to 6 percent slopes), Urban land-Udorthents complex (0 to 15 percent slopes), and Urban land-Udorthents-Grigsby complex (0 to 6 percent slopes) (NRCS 2013). The Roxana site contains a small area of soils classified as farmland of statewide importance (NRCS 2013). The soil is Allegheny Loam and is located in the floodplain of the North Fork of the Kentucky River in the northernmost portion of the site. None of the soils associated with the Roxana site are listed as hydric by NRCS. Environmental Consequences 5.2.2.1 Construction Development of the site would require significant excavation and fill activities to create a level pad for construction of the facilities and access roads. A 2:1 fill slope and a 1:1 cut slope were used in the estimate of fill and excavation quantities adjacent to the pads and roads to transition to the original topography at the Roxana site. More detail on the earthwork calculations can be found in Appendix B, Excavation and Grading Calculations. As identified in Table 2-2, Estimated Site Preparation Quantities for Alternative 2 – Roxana, excavation activities (cut) would include 9,204,340 cubic yards (7,037,223 cubic meters) of spoil material and 953,246 cubic yards (728,809 cubic meters) of rock. The excavated soil and rock would be compacted to create a structural fill for the building pads and in the valleys. The amount of structural fill was estimated to be 9,402,582 cubic yards (7,188,790 cubic meters). All excavated materials would be used on-site for structural fill. The maximum cut (excavation) at Roxana would be approximately 20 meters and the maximum fill would be approximately 65 meters. Removal of bedrock would require blasting activities. Impacts resulting from the cut and fill activities would include loss of productive soil, erosion, and destabilization of slopes. As a result of the excavation and fill activities, the topography of the site would change at the maximum cut from 465 meters to 445 meters 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky MSL in the main building area and at the maximum fill from 370 meters to 445 meters MSL in the firing range area. No construction would occur in the area of soils classified as farmland of statewide importance; therefore, farmland soils would not be impacted and no coordination with NRCS would be required. 5.2.2.2 Operations No further impacts to topography, geology or soils are anticipated from the operation of the USP and FPC. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.2.3. Mitigation The Bureau would prepare a soil erosion and sediment control plan and submit it to the Kentucky Division of Water for approval prior to construction. The erosion and sediment control plan would outline the measures and BMPs to be used for controlling on-site erosion and sedimentation during construction. BMPs could include placement of silt fencing adjacent to surface waters and wetlands to prevent the introduction of sediment; the use of hay bales to minimize the spread of sediment off the construction site; stabilization of steep slopes; use of tree clearing plans; and stormwater control plans to manage stormwater runoff and keep it on-site during construction. Additionally, construction of the USP, FPC, and ancillary facilities could be phased to occur at different times, resulting in the minimization of disturbed soil by clearing only the area necessary for the current phase of construction. Re-vegetation of disturbed areas following the completion of construction would also occur to minimize the erosion of exposed soil. SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Affected Environment 5.3.1.1 Population The 2013 population of Letcher County was 24,025. Letcher County’s population decreased by approximately 3 percent between 2000 and 2010 (Table 5-1). The City of Whitesburg grew by approximately 34 percent from 2000 to 2010 and the City of Jenkins population decreased by 3 percent during the same time period. The decrease in population is likely the result of people who leave the area for better education and employment opportunities (KRADD 2013). This trend is anticipated to continue within the county with the population decreasing by an additional 7 percent by the year 2020. 5-4 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 5-1. Study Area Population Trends, 2000–2010 Geographic Area 2000 2010 Percent Change 2000–2010 Whitesburg, Kentucky 1,598 2,139 33.85 --- --- Jenkins, Kentucky 2,273 2,203 -3.08 --- --- Letcher County, Kentucky 25,275 24,519 -2.99 22,655 -6.88 4,041,769 4,339,357 7.36 4,699,880 8.3 Kentucky 2020 Projected Population* Projected Percent Change 2010–2020 Note: *2020 Projections only available for county and state. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2000, U.S. Census Bureau 2010, Proximity One 2014. 5.3.1.2 Employment and Income Letcher County’s 2013 employed civilian labor force was 7,103, out of a total civilian labor force of 8,201. Employment by industry in Letcher County is depicted in Table 5-2. The industries that employ the greatest number of people in Letcher County include educational services, and health care and social assistance (33.4 percent); agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining (13.0 percent); and retail trade (12.7 percent). In Kentucky, the largest industry employers are educational services, and health care and social assistance (24.5 percent); manufacturing (13.7 percent); and retail trade (11.8 percent) (U.S. Census Bureau 2014a). Letcher County is part of the largest coal producing area in eastern Kentucky. While study area jobs in the coal mining industry have been declining, positions in the health care, retail, and the secondary wood industries have increased. However, these jobs typically pay less than coal mining jobs. The study area is part of a region characterized by high unemployment and poverty rates (KRADD 2013). 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 5-2. Study Area Employment, 2013 Industry Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation and warehousing, and utilities Information Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental/leasing Professional, scientific, management, and administrative and waste management services Educational services, health care and social assistance Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food services Other services, except public administration Public administration Total Letcher County, Kentucky Number Percent Employed Employed Kentucky Number Percent Employed Employed 922 13.0 52,348 2.8 442 213 209 904 6.2 3.0 2.9 12.7 111,646 255,938 49,171 219,721 6.0 13.7 2.6 11.8 360 5.1 112,005 6.0 98 1.4 29,217 1.6 199 2.8 102,380 5.5 413 5.8 144,589 7.8 2,369 33.4 456,293 24.5 468 6.6 159,679 8.6 252 3.5 87,228 4.7 254 7,103 3.6 85,390 1,865,605 4.6 Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014a. While unemployment rates in Kentucky have decreased from a peak of 10.3 percent in 2009 to 6.5 percent in 2014, the unemployment rate in Letcher County increased dramatically from 10.6 percent in 2009 to 17.3 percent in 2013 (Table 5-3). The preliminary 2014 unemployment rate for Letcher County has decreased to 11.5 percent. The comparable rate for the U.S. was 6.3 percent (KYLMI 2014). Unemployment rates in the study area are higher than the comparable rates for the state and the nation. Along with the “displaced worker,” the study area has a higher percentage of “discouraged” workers who no longer actively seek employment and are, therefore, not included in the official unemployment statistics. Therefore, the official unemployment rate in the study area is deceptively lower than actual unemployment (KRADD 2013). Table 5-3. Study Area Percent Unemployment Rates Jurisdiction Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky 2007 7.7 5.6 2008 7.1 6.6 2009 10.6 10.3 2010 11.4 10.2 Notes: Unemployment rates are not seasonally adjusted. aAugust 2014, preliminary. Source: KYLMI 2014. 2011 10.3 9.5 2012 13.8 8.3 2013 17.3 8.3 2014a 11.5 6.5 Total personal income includes net earnings by place of residence; dividends, interest, and rent received; and benefits paid by federal, state, and local governments and businesses. A larger portion of personal income in Letcher County comes from government and business benefits than for Kentucky and the U.S (U.S. Department of Commerce 2014). Total personal income in Letcher County decreased by almost 2 percent from 2010 to 2012, while over the same period, personal income increased by approximately 10 percent in Kentucky (Table 5-4). 5-6 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Between 2010 and 2012, per capita income increased in Letcher County by less than 1 percent while per capita income in Kentucky increased by 8 percent. The national per capita income was $43,735 (U.S. Department of Commerce 2014). Table 5-4. Study Area Personal and Per Capita Income Jurisdiction Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky 2010 Personal Income (000)a 2012 Personal Income (000)a Percent Change 2010–2012 2010 Per Capita Income 2012 Per Capita Income Percent Change 2010–2012 $686,680 $674,369 -1.8 $27,948 $28,155 0.7 $143,210,961 $157,043,042 9.7 $32,947 $35,643 8.2 Notes: Not adjusted for inflation. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce 2014. 5.3.1.3 Housing There were 11,519 housing units in Letcher County in 2013, with a total vacancy rate of approximately 19 percent (Table 5-5). The vacancy rate for owner-occupied units was 0.3 percent and the vacancy rate for rental units was 1.9 percent. The comparable vacancy rates in Kentucky were higher, at 12.4 percent, 2.1 percent, and 6.7 percent respectively (U.S. Census Bureau 2014b). Table 5-5. Study Area Housing Units, 2013 Geographic Area Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014b. 5.3.1.4 Vacant Housing Units Housing Units 11,519 2,155 1,933,019 239,620 Percent Vacant 18.7 12.4 Homeowner Vacancy Rate 0.3 2.1 Rental Vacancy Rate 1.9 6.7 Environmental Justice For the purpose of this evaluation, minority refers to people who identified themselves in the census as Black or African American, Asian, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaskan Native, other non-White races, or as being of Hispanic or Latino origin. Persons of Hispanic and Latino origin may be of any race (CEQ 1997). The CEQ identifies these groups as minority populations when either (1) the minority population of the affected area exceeds 50 percent or (2) the minority population percentage in the affected area is meaningfully greater than the minority population percentage in the general population or the geographic region of comparison (most often the state in which the affected area is part). The geographical unit for comparison in this analysis is Kentucky. U.S. Census Bureau data on the racial and ethnic composition of the study area in 2013 are summarized in Table 5-6. Overall, the majority of the study area is white. Letcher County has a smaller percentage of minority and Hispanic populations than Kentucky. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-7 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 5-6. Study Area Percent Race and Ethnicity, 2013 Jurisdiction Whitesburg, Kentucky Jenkins, Kentucky Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky White 97.1 98.4 98.3 87.8 Black/African American 1.5 0.5 0.2 7.9 American Indian/Alaska Native 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 Asian 0.6 0.0 0.6 1.2 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hispanic or Latino Origina 1.3 0.9 0.7 3.2 Notes: Data presented reflects most reported race and ethnicity categories; percentages may not add to 100 percent due to rounding. *Hispanic origin may be of any race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014c. Table 5-7 presents data on low-income families and individuals in the study area. The percentages of low-income families and individuals in Letcher County with incomes below poverty level (based on family size and composition) are greater than for Kentucky. In the study area, the City of Jenkins has the highest percentages of families and individuals with incomes below the poverty level. Table 5-7. Study Area Percent Below Poverty Level, 2013 Jurisdiction Whitesburg, Kentucky Jenkins, Kentucky Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014a. 5.3.1.5 Families Below Poverty Level 5.5 27.6 20.0 14.6 Individuals Below Poverty Level 14.2 32.1 24.2 19.1 Protection of Children The percentage of children under the age of 18 is lower in Whitesburg, Jenkins, and Letcher County than for Kentucky (Table 5-8). Table 5-8. Study Area Percent Under the Age of 18, 2013 Jurisdiction Whitesburg, Kentucky Jenkins, Kentucky Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2014c. <18 16.4 20.8 22.3 23.3 Environmental Consequences 5.3.2.1 Population Approximately 300 new employees would be needed to operate the proposed USP and FPC. It is anticipated that some of these employees would be existing Bureau employees who would relocate to the area and the rest would be hired locally. Under a maximum case scenario, all 300 new personnel are assumed to move to the study area. The Bureau personnel would likely be accompanied by their families or other household members. The U.S. Census Bureau has determined that the average household size for the U.S., which is assumed to be similar to the average household size of transfer employees, is 2.58 (U.S. Census Bureau 2010). Under this assumption, approximately 774 people would be added to the study area population. This would represent 3.2 percent of the Letcher County 2013 population. This gain would help to offset some of the 5-8 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky recent and projected population losses in Letcher County. Alternative 2 would result in a minor beneficial impact to the study area’s short- and long-term population trends. 5.3.2.2 Employment and Income The increase of 300 full-time positions would represent approximately 4 percent of the Letcher County 2013 civilian labor force. Study area personal income would also increase as a result of job growth. Some of the increased wage earnings would be paid to taxes, and some would be saved and invested, but most would be spent on consumer goods and services in the study area. This spending would, in turn, “ripple” through the economy, generating additional indirect jobs and income and benefitting the study area economy. Given the rate of unemployment in the study area (11.5 percent), it would be expected that many of these indirect positions would be filled by unemployed local residents. In addition, inmates’ family members would be expected to visit, boosting visitor spending in hotels/motels and restaurants in the study area. No population in-migration to the study area would be expected as a result of indirect job growth. The increase in construction spending would also generate direct construction jobs and indirect jobs, typically in food services and retail trade. Additional construction workers may move into the study area in response to the direct construction jobs, but these workers would most likely leave the area for other opportunities when the construction project nears completion. Further, given the study area unemployment rate, it would be expected that most of the indirect positions would be filled by unemployed study area workers. While there may be some population in-migration to the study area as a result of construction spending, it would not be expected to significantly affect population trends. Alternative 2 would result in beneficial employment and income impacts in the study area. While the purchase of land by the Bureau for Alternative 2 would reduce property tax revenues, additional taxes would accrue to federal, state, and local governments as a result of the increase in payrolls, and operational and construction spending. It is anticipated that, on balance, the fiscal/economic impacts would be beneficial and there would be no significant adverse fiscal/economic impacts. 5.3.2.3 Housing Alternative 2 would result in an increase of 300 full-time positions in the study area. Under a conservative scenario, all these personnel would seek housing in Letcher County at the same time. This would represent about 2.6 percent of Letcher County’s total housing units and approximately 14 percent of the vacant units. Some additional housing may be developed by the private market to support USP and FPC employees who choose to live in Letcher County. However, not all new personnel would live in Letcher County and the increase in personnel would occur over the construction period before the USP and FPC become operational, reducing any potential negative impacts to the study area’s housing market. 5.3.2.4 Environmental Justice Based on the assessment of socioeconomic and potential environmental impacts for the proposed Roxana facility, beneficial employment and income impacts, as well as minor beneficial impacts to population in the surrounding communities would be expected as a result of Alternative 2. There are no adverse environmental impacts that would have disproportionately high or adverse environmental effects on minority or low-income populations. Therefore, Alternative 2 would not result in significant adverse impacts to environmental justice communities. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-9 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 5.3.2.5 Protection of Children There are no adverse environmental impacts that would result in disproportionate health or safety risks to children. Therefore, Alternative 2 would not result in significant adverse impacts to the health or safety of children. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.3.3. Mitigation No adverse impacts to socioeconomics, environmental justice populations, or children would be expected; therefore, no mitigation would be warranted. COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES Affected Environment 5.4.1.1 Police Law enforcement servicing the area around and including the Roxana site includes the Whitesburg Police Department, Letcher County Sheriff, and Kentucky State Police. The Whitesburg Police Department is comprised of 6 police officers, 1 chief of police, 1 second in command, and 1 secretary. They are currently short staffed one police officer. The department has eight squad cars and provides 24-hour coverage (Whitesburg Police Department 2013). The Letcher County Sheriff’s office is comprised of 13 full-time employees including 10 deputies and 3 dispatchers. The office operates 10 squad cars and is headquartered in Whitesburg. The office provides 24-hour coverage, seven days a week (Letcher County Sheriff 2013). The Kentucky State Police Post 13 operates out of Hazard, and covers five counties, including Letcher County. The Hazard Post currently has 39 state troopers, 18 dispatchers, 3 clerks, 1 custodian, 1 criminal analyst, and 1 arson specialist. They operate 39 squad cars, and have 8 to 10 spare squad cars available in the event one is needed (Kentucky State Police 2013). 5.4.1.2 Fire Fire departments that provide emergency services for the Roxana area include Letcher County Fire and Rescue, Whitesburg Fire and Rescue, and the Kings Creek Volunteer Fire Department. The Letcher County Fire and Rescue provide fire response to the area of the Roxana site. Letcher County Fire and Rescue is comprised of 32 firefighters (20 paid and 12 volunteer). Fifteen of the personnel are EMTs. Letcher County Fire and Rescue has stations in Jeremiah, Blackey, and Hallie, and services the western portion of Letcher County. Fire rescue equipment includes five ambulances, two tanker trucks, and three engines (Letcher County Fire and Rescue 2013). Whitesburg Fire and Rescue consists of 30 firefighters: 25 volunteer and 5 paid. Five of the firefighters are EMTs. The station has five engines and a boom truck with a snorkel. Whitesburg Fire and Rescue has mutual aid agreements with the rest of Letcher County and is able to assist with emergencies throughout the county if dispatched (Whitesburg Fire and Rescue 2013). The Kings Creek Volunteer Fire Department is located on KY 60 approximately 1.5 miles from the Roxana site. The fire department has 23 volunteers, 1 pumper truck, and 2 large tanker trucks. The Kings 5-10 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Creek Volunteer Fire Department has relationships with other local volunteer fire departments and through a local paging system, can request assistance from these departments (Kings Creek Volunteer Fire Department 2015). 5.4.1.3 Health Care Appalachian Regional Healthcare (ARH) serves over 350,000 residents in eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia. Their operations in Letcher County, Kentucky include the Whitesburg ARH Hospital, ARH Whitesburg Clinic, Jenkins ARH Family Care Center, Neon ARH Family Care Center, Whitesburg ARH Surgical Clinic, ARH Cardiology Associates-Whitesburg, and Whitesburg ARH Home Health Agency. Whitesburg ARH completed an $11 million renovation project in 2011 that included a 15,000 square foot addition to the facility that houses surgical, obstetric, and newborn patients. Renovations to the existing space included a complete remodel of the third floor to include six Intensive Care Unit beds and 20 private patient rooms. Whitesburg ARH Hospital provides 24-hour emergency service for both adult and pediatric patients and has an on-site heliport for receiving and transferring patients. Whitesburg ARH is an acute care hospital that covers internal medicine, family practice, pediatrics, general surgery, advanced laparoscopic surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, cardiology, pulmonology, radiology and emergency services (ARH 2014). Mountain Comprehensive Health Corporation is one of the largest rural health centers in Kentucky. Its Whitesburg facility is the largest clinic, and offers dental, family and internal medicine, pediatrics, cardiology, pulmonology, and obstetrics and gynecological services, as well as a rehabilitation program. Mountain Comprehensive Health Corporation also has a full service laboratory (Mountain Comprehensive Health Corporation 2015). 5.4.1.4 Schools The schools in Letcher County are administered by the Letcher County School District. There are five elementary schools, three middle schools, and one high school. Table 5-9 identifies the names of the schools, the grades they serve, the number of students enrolled for the 2014–2015 school year, and the actual capacity of each school. Table 5-9. Letcher County Schools Enrollment and Capacity for 2014–2015 School Arlie Boggs Elementary Cowan Elementary Fleming Neon Middle School Letcher County Elementary Letcher County Middle School Letcher County Central High School West Whitesburg Elementary School Whitesburg Middle School Martha Jane Potter Elementary Source: Wagoner 2014. Grades K-8 K-8 6-8 K-5 6-8 9-12 K-5 6-8 K-5 Number of Students 127 423 202 372 158 929 392 170 438 Capacity 248 440 352 418 225 1,033 440 225 425 Environmental Consequences 5.4.2.1 Police The vast majority of inmate incidents that arise at USPs, including those that could arise at the proposed USP at Roxana, would be addressed internally through the Bureau’s disciplinary process. However, 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-11 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky should a law enforcement emergency arise at the proposed USP for which outside law enforcement assistance is needed, the Letcher County Sheriff and Kentucky State Police have advised that they would be able to provide such assistance if needed. Both these agencies, respectively, have stated that they would be willing to discuss development of an MOU with the Bureau to provide these services. Both of these law enforcement agencies also advised that the proposed facility would not result in impacts to their services or require the hiring of additional staff. A Whitesburg city official indicated that the Whitesburg Police Department could also assist if requested, although doing so might have some impact on its operations and might require additional equipment (refer to communication logs in Appendix A, Agency Coordination). Therefore, while there is potential for impacts to the Whitesburg Police Department if requested to respond to a law enforcement emergency at the proposed USP, given that other state and local law enforcement agencies would be available to respond, less than significant impacts to law enforcement resources are expected under Alternative 2. 5.4.2.2 Fire The proposed USP and FPC would have designated Bureau staff and on-site fire-fighting equipment and resources capable of responding to and handling most fires or fire-related emergencies that might occur. However, to the extent that limited and infrequent response by outside fire or emergency resources would be needed, the local emergency service providers have indicated they would be able to provide assistance in the event of an emergency that was beyond the capabilities of Bureau staff. These providers have indicated interest in discussing the development of an MOU with the Bureau to provide these services. They have also indicated that providing such services, if requested, would not be expected to result in impacts to their services or require the hiring of additional staff (refer to communication logs Appendix A, Agency Coordination). Therefore, Alternative 2 would not have significant impacts to local fire and emergency services. 5.4.2.3 Health Care Most health care needs or emergencies that would arise at the proposed USP and FPC would be handled by Bureau medical staff. However, health care facilities are located near the Roxana site and would be able to accommodate inmates at the proposed USP and FPC if needed. Discussions with ARH indicate they have staff familiar with accommodating inmates and the necessary security requirements that would need to be implemented to bring an inmate into an ARH facility. ARH indicated this would not be a problem and they would be able to accommodate the facility if an inmate would require care outside of the USP or FPC. ARH also indicated they would be willing to work with the Bureau to develop an MOU (Sparkman 2014). Therefore, there would be no adverse impact to health care services under Alternative 2. 5.4.2.4 Schools Approximately 300 new employees would be needed to operate the proposed USP and FPC. It is anticipated that some of these employees would be existing Bureau employees that would relocate to the area. Under a maximum case scenario, it is assumed that Bureau employees relocating to operate the facility would reside within the immediate area (Whitesburg, Jenkins, or Letcher County). With the exception of Martha Jane Potter Elementary school, all the schools within Letcher County School District have sufficient capacity to accept new students. 5-12 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.4.3. Mitigation With the exception of the potential for an adverse impact to the Whitesburg Police Department, no impacts to community facilities and services would occur; therefore, no mitigation would be warranted. With respect to the Whitesburg Police Department, the Bureau would discuss the development of an MOU with the chief of police and the Mayor of Whitesburg and determine the department’s status and what steps may be taken to off-set those impacts. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC Affected Environment The Roxana site is located approximately 7.5 miles west of Whitesburg, and would be constructed to the south of KY 588 and to the west of KY 160. Proximate to the proposed correctional facility, KY 588 is a two-lane roadway designated as a Class II highway. Class II highways have lower speed collector roads and are primarily designed to provide access. KY 160 is classified as a rural major collector (KYTC 2014a). In terms truck weight, both KY 588 and KY 160 are Class “A” roadways that can accommodate trucks having a gross vehicle weight of up to 44,000 pounds (KYTC 2014c; KYTC 2015). Potential access points include a connection to the north to KY 588, a connection to the east to KY 160, and/or a connection to the west to an existing roadway that traverses north/south between KY 588 and Lilly Cornett Branch Road. A traffic impact study (Appendix F) was conducted for the proposed action in April 2015. Based on the analysis in the traffic impact study, the current Annual Average Daily Traffic for KY 160 is 550 per day, and for KY 588 it is 330 per day (Parsons 2015). KY 588 a.m. and p.m. peak periods both function at an LOS A. Environmental Consequences The transportation network associated with the Roxana site is primarily two-lane unstriped rural roadways. The infrastructure would not be able to support construction equipment and vehicles traveling to the site. As defined by KYTC, rural minor collectors “provide service to…smaller communities, link locally important traffic generators to larger towns, and collect traffic from local roads. They should be spaced at intervals consistent with population density to bring all developed areas within a reasonable distance of a collector road” (KYTC 2014a). Per KYTC, rural major collectors “provide service to county seats, larger towns, and other traffic generators of intracounty importance, which are not directly served by a higher system and link them to larger towns or routes with higher classifications. Examples of traffic generators for this classification include schools, shipping points, county parks, and important mining and agricultural areas” (KYTC 2014a). For the purposes of this analysis it was assumed the most likely access to the site would be from KY 588. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-13 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 5.5.2.1 Construction Alternative 2 would involve the same types of construction activities as Alternative 1, and would temporarily increase traffic volumes during the construction period. Trucks would be used to deliver/remove construction materials and equipment, and to haul excess fill material and/or construction debris. Because traffic volumes are relatively low on roadways that provide access to the site, the temporary increase in truck traffic is not expected to have a significant effect on street capacity. However, particularly heavy trucks could exceed the maximum weight limit of certain bridges located near the Roxana site. This potential impact would be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of the mitigation described below in Section 5.5.4, Mitigation. With the implementation of this measure, the addition of construction related trips is not expected to result in a significant trafficrelated impact. Additionally, impacts to KY 588 are anticipated due to truck traffic transporting construction equipment and materials to the proposed Roxana site. KY 588 has narrow lane widths and pavement design that is not at a level for a national or state truck route (Parsons 2015). 5.5.2.2 Operations Following construction, the proposed federal correctional facility would add traffic to the surrounding street network on a recurring basis. This traffic increase would include commuting trips of 300 full-time employees plus additional trips such as the transfer of inmates, inmate visitors, and delivery of supplies and equipment, which would not necessarily coincide with peak commuting periods. Table 5-10 presents peak hour traffic generation. As shown in this table, the proposed facility would add approximately 156 trips during the morning peak hour and 204 trips during the afternoon peak hour. Accordingly, operations traffic for Alternative 2 has the potential to incrementally increase congestion on the surrounding roadway network. Potential effects include increased delay at intersections and/or reduced travel speed on roadway segments. These potential impacts would be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of mitigation described below in Section 5.5.4, Mitigation. Table 5-10. Estimated Peak Hour Trip Generation In 97 AM Peak Hour Trips Out 59 Total 156 In 55 PM Peak Hour Trips Out 149 Total 204 Note::(a) Land use and trip rates from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition (ITE 2012) for Land Use 571 (Prison). Source: Parsons 2015. Based on the trip generation and existing conditions, the traffic impact analysis determined that KY 588 in the vicinity of the Roxana site would function at LOS B. Additionally, the traffic impact analysis determined that the intersection of KY 588 and the proposed access to the Roxana site would function at LOS A during a.m. and p.m. peak periods for both northbound and westbound traffic (Parsons 2015). Based on the traffic impact analysis, there would be no significant impacts to traffic. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.5.3. Mitigation Mitigation measures would include a requirement that the selected construction contractor perform an assessment of the routing of construction traffic to the site. The construction contractor would also be required to: 5-14 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Route construction vehicles so that gross vehicle weight does not exceed the maximum weight limitations established by the KYTC Bond the roads where limitations may be exceeded and repair the roads upon completion of construction Develop and implement a maintenance of traffic plan to maintain traffic flow when construction equipment is being transported to the site • • • AIR QUALITY Affected Environment Like Alternative 1, the affected environment for Alternative 2 includes the Appalachian Intrastate Air Quality Control Region. Air quality in the study area is considered good, with the study area designated as unclassifiable, attainment, or better than national standards for all criteria pollutants. Environmental Consequences The results of the air emissions analysis show that construction and operational emissions under Alternative 2 would remain well below the significance thresholds and would not have a significant impact on the local or regional air quality. A summary of the analysis is presented below and the complete analysis is provided in Appendix C, Air Emissions Calculations. 5.6.2.1 Construction Direct impacts from emissions from construction would include combustion emissions from fossil fuelpowered equipment and fugitive dust emissions (PM10 and PM2.5) during clearing, demolition activities, earth moving activities, and operation of equipment on bare soil. Table 5-11 presents estimates for the primary construction activities that would utilize heavy duty diesel equipment for the Roxana site. Table 5-11. Construction Emission Estimates for Roxana Site Site Roxana Roxana Year 1 2 VOC Tons 3.27 3.27 CO Tons 13.87 13.87 NOx Tons 42.32 42.32 SO2 Tons 0.83 0.83 PM10 Tons 158.71 106.64 PM2.5 Tons 18.05 12.85 Fugitive dust from land disturbance activities would be the primary source of emissions during construction, with most of the emissions occurring during Year 1. PM10 emissions are estimated using wetting and other typical reduction practices to reduce dust release by 50 percent. PM10 emissions are predicted to be greatest in Year 1 at the Roxana site, at 158.71 TPY. These emissions, however, would remain well below the significance threshold of 250 TPY. Construction emissions would not have direct or indirect significant impacts on the region’s air quality. Direct impacts to air quality may also include emissions from the burning of construction debris, if such an activity were undertaken during construction. Vegetative debris and/or demolition and construction materials would be disposed in accordance with all laws and regulations. Should open burning be necessary, it would be conducted in accordance with 401 KAR 63:005, Open Burning. 5.6.2.2 Operations Table 5-12 presents the annual emissions based on the site being fully operational. Stationary sources operating on-site would include two 2000-kilowatt diesel-powered emergency generators and three 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-15 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky boilers to provide heat and hot water for the site. The boilers have been estimated at 15 MMBtu/hr. One of the boilers would serve as a backup, so air emission calculations evaluated use of two boilers. All of these stationary sources would require an air permit and be regulated by the KDEP, Division for Air Quality. Analysis of permit requirements based on the final stationary source(s) type and design would be performed as design requirements are more fully delineated. This would ensure regulatory permit compliance and that all requisite source registrations would be submitted. In addition to stationary sources, the emissions from staff commuting to and from work have been estimated at 300 employees and working 365 days per year. The round trip was estimated at 40 miles because of the rural location of the Roxana site. Table 5-12. Estimated Annual Operational Emissions Source Generators Boilers Staff Vehicles Total VOC Tons/Year 0.25 0.26 0.19 0.70 CO Tons/year 2.15 3.80 23.38 29.33 NOx Tons/ Year 5.09 15.2 1.07 21.36 SO2 Tons/Year 0.00 0.16 0.02 0.18 PM10 Tons/Year 0.27 0.76 0.12 1.16 PM2.5 Tons/Year 0.27 0.19 0.11 0.58 All of the criteria pollutant emissions remain well below the significance threshold of 250 TPY. Based on the emission estimates, operation of the federal correctional facility at the Roxana site would not have direct or indirect significant impacts on the local or regional air quality. No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, construction of the USP and FPC would not occur. The No Action Alternative would not result in emissions of any air pollutants. Therefore, there would be no impact to regional air quality Mitigation Best management practices would be implemented to reduce air emissions. They may include, but are not limited to: • • • • Periodic wetting during clearing, excavation, filling, and grading activities to minimize impacts to air quality (PM10 emissions) from fugitive dust Utilization of alternatively fueled equipment Utilization of other emission controls that are applicable to the equipment being used on-site Reduction of idling time of equipment and construction vehicles NOISE Affected Environment The Roxana site is located in a rural area with minimal noise. Areas of the site located immediately adjacent to KY 588 and KY 160 would experience some noise from traffic traveling through the area. There is nothing located on the site that currently generates noise. 5-16 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Environmental Consequences 5.7.2.1 Construction Construction activities under Alternative 2 would result in temporary, short-term increases in noise levels. Noise associated with construction equipment and vehicles, as well as blasting activities to remove bedrock, would occur during site preparation and construction. Alternative 2 would generate noise during the construction phases of the USP and FPC. Phases of construction that would generate noise include: land clearing and excavations, pile driving, foundation and capping, erection of structural materials, and construction of exterior walls. Noise from construction equipment operating at the site, construction/delivery vehicles traveling to and from the site, and pile driving activities required for placement of deep pile foundations would impact noise levels. Noise levels at a given receptor location would depend on the type and number of pieces of construction equipment being operated and the receptor’s distance from the construction site. Table 5-13 lists construction related noise emissions, which can range from 74 to 101 dBA when measured 50 feet from the respective piece of equipment. Small increases in noise levels would be expected as a result of the operation of delivery trucks and other construction vehicles. However, larger increases in noise levels would result if pile driving activities are necessary. Increased noise levels would be greatest during the early stages of each construction phase, although these periods would be of relatively short duration. However, under the worst case scenario during pile driving, there would be periods during construction when noise would range from 101 dBA at 50 feet from the equipment to 89 dBA at 200 feet from the equipment. The 200-foot radius from the equipment would encompass primarily rural undeveloped areas, depending on the location of the pile driving equipment at any given time on the Roxana site. Residences adjacent to the Roxana site are well over 200 feet from the majority of construction areas. When compared to the existing noise conditions at the Roxana site (35 dBA) and the OSHA noise thresholds for workers, the pile driving activities would result in significant short-term impacts to noise receptors located within 200 feet of the pile driving equipment location at the construction site, which would vary as the foundation piles would be driven throughout the foundation footprint. Moderate noise impacts would extend up to 1.5 miles from the construction site, as this is the distance at which noise levels would attenuate down to 55–60 dBA. In conclusion, temporary and short-term noise disturbance would occur during construction; however, implementation of noise attenuation measures described below would reduce potential disturbance from noise. Therefore, implementation of Alternative 2 would have no significant impacts to sensitive noise receptors from noise. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-17 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 5-13. Airborne Construction Related Noise Emissions Equipment Description Flat Bed Truck Welder/Torch Man Lift Dump Truck Backhoe Compressor (air) Concrete Mixer Truck Drill Rig Truck Front End Loader Rivet Buster/Chipping Gun Ventilation Fan Drum Mixer Vibratory Concrete Mixer Concrete Pump Truck Crane Generator Pumps Dozer Boring Jack Power Unit Warning Horn Auger Drill Rig Scraper Pneumatic Tools Vacuum Excavator Vibrating Hopper Jackhammer Concrete Saw Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram) Sheers (on backhoe) Impact Pile Driver Vibratory Pile Driver Source: Federal Highway Administration 2006. 5.7.2.2 Actual Measured Lmax at 50 feet (dBA) 74 74 75 76 78 78 79 79 79 79 79 80 80 81 81 81 81 82 83 83 84 84 85 85 87 89 90 90 96 101 101 Operations The operation of the proposed USP and FPC, once construction is completed, is not expected to significantly increase ambient noise levels. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.7.3. Mitigation To minimize the impact to noise receptors during the operation of the pile driving equipment, a variety of measures would be taken, including but not limited to: • • • 5-18 Using noise bellows systems to provide further noise attenuation Performing the work during daytime hours Scheduling the louder construction activities for less intrusive times (mid-morning to midafternoon) 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES Affected Environment 5.8.1.1 Potable Water The LCWSD purchases water from Knott County to distribute in the Roxana area. The Bureau reviewed the Consumer Confidence Reports (CCRs or Water Quality Reports) for the LCWSD and the Knott County Water and Sewer District for the past three reporting years of 2012, 2013, and 2014. The LCWSD CCR for 2012 indicated two violations of turbidity levels for water provided to LCWSD by Knott County. LCWSD also had an issue in 2014 for failing to submit reports to the drinking water database on time. The Knott County Water and Sewer District CCR for 2012 indicates their system exceeded the turbidity standard on two occasions, as mentioned above. In 2013, Knott County had no violations for the water their system provided; however, they were cited for failing to provide their customers with a CCR. In 2014, the Knott County Water and Sewer District had no violations. Knott County Water and Sewer District has a withdrawal permit of 4 million gallons per day. Current usage between Knott County and the LCWSD is approximately 2 million gallons per day (Lewis 2015). The LCWSD is currently in the process of extending their water system to the eastern property boundary of the proposed Roxana site. The water main at this location is 8 inches in diameter and has water pressure near the connection point of approximately 110 pounds per square inch. Potable water would be provided by the LCWSD via this connection at the eastern property boundary (Cardno 2014a). Because municipally supplied water in Knott County is drawn from surface waters of the North Fork of the Kentucky River, indirect impacts to public health have the potential to occur if drinking water quality were to be compromised by coal mining or other activities in the watershed (LCWSD 2014). The water supply would need be treated to meet drinking water standards prior to distribution to consumers. If drinking water standards cannot be met a public health advisory would be issued and consumers would be advised as to how to further treat the water at home (i.e., boiling) or a consumption ban would be implemented and consumers would be provided with bottled water (KDEP 2015). 5.8.1.2 Wastewater The LCWSD provides sanitary sewer service to the Roxana area. As with the water service, the LCWSD is currently extending their wastewater collection service in the area of the Roxana site. The closest existing connection is approximately 2.75 miles from the Roxana site (Figure 5-2). The LCWSD does not currently have plans to extend the sanitary sewer service to the property boundary of the Roxana site (Cardno 2014a). The LCWSD has a permitted capacity of 600,000 gallons per day and currently treats approximately 300,000 gallons per day. 5.8.1.3 Natural Gas The Roxana site contains multiple gas wells and gas transmission lines. There are 14 Hayden Harper gas wells and one EQT gas well within the Roxana site (Cardno 2014a). Gas transmission lines are also adjacent to the Roxana site. 5.8.1.4 Electricity AEP lines extend along KY 160 and Big Branch-Tolson Creek Road in the vicinity of the Roxana site and would be able to provide electricity to the Roxana site (Cardno 2014a). 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-19 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 5-2. Roxana Existing Utilities 5-20 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 5.8.1.5 Telecommunications Birch Communications provides telecommunications services to the area where the Roxana site is located. Birch Communications has the capacity to provide telecommunications service to the Roxana site (Cardno 2014a). 5.8.1.6 Solid Waste Solid waste generated within Letcher County is disposed of at the Laurel Ridge Landfill in London, Kentucky, approximately 90 miles west of Whitesburg (Laurel Ridge Landfill 2014). The Laurel Ridge Landfill has a maximum annual limit of 350,000 tons. The landfill currently receives approximately 320,000 tons annually. Based on their current capacity, the landfill has a 30-year life expectancy. Environmental Consequences 5.8.2.1 Potable Water The LCWSD has assured the Bureau that the Knott County Water and Sewer District, the supplier of potable water to the LCWSD for the Roxana site, has resolved past water quality issues and should not have further violations of drinking water quality standards (Lewis 2015). The most recent water report for LCWSD (2014) indicates no violations of drinking water standards. Therefore, implementation of Alternative 2 would have no significant impacts related to water quality. The USP and FPC are anticipated to require 214 gallons per day per inmate. Based on an anticipated inmate population of 1,200, a total of 258,000 gallons per day would be required under the proposed action. Additionally, the utility plant, warehouses, and training building would require approximately 6,160 gallons per day. Therefore, operation of the proposed federal correctional facility would require approximately 264,000 gallons of potable water per day. The Knott County Water and Sewer District has a withdrawal permit of 4 million gallons per day. Current usage between Knott County and LCWSD is approximately 2 million gallons per day; therefore, available capacity is 2 million gallons per day. The LCWSD does not have a limit on the amount of water it can purchase. The proposed action requirement for 264,000 gallons per day is well within the available capacity. Therefore, the additional usage by the USP, FPC, and ancillary facilities would not result in impacts to the water supply under Alternative 2. 5.8.2.2 Wastewater Implementation of the proposed action under Alternative 2 would generate approximately 224,000 gallons per day of wastewater. This would increase wastewater treatment at the LCWSD to 524,000 gallons per day, which would not result in the LCWSD exceeding their permitted capacity of 600,000 gallons per day. Therefore, no adverse impacts to wastewater would occur under Alternative 2. 5.8.2.3 Natural Gas Implementation of the proposed action under Alternative 2 would require the closure and plugging of 15 gas wells that are located within the Roxana site. It would take approximately six months to close these wells. Closure of the 15 gas wells would result in significant impacts to Hayden Harper and EQT, the owners of the gas wells. The Bureau would be able to connect to the natural gas distribution system located adjacent to the Roxana property for the cost of the meter and tap, which is estimated to be $110,000. There is sufficient natural gas available and, therefore, the use of natural gas at the USP and FPC would not impact natural gas availability. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-21 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 5.8.2.4 Electricity In coordination with the electric service provider, AEP has indicated it has ample capacity to provide service to the federal correctional facility. AEP would extend overhead lines to a predetermined handoff point to the secure perimeter, and the Bureau would extend the service on-site to the needed facilities (Cardno 2014a). There would be no charge to extend the overhead lines to the handoff point and no issues with capacity; therefore, no adverse impacts to electrical capacity would occur under Alternative 2. 5.8.2.5 Telecommunications Implementation of the proposed action under Alternative 2 would not result in impacts to the available capacity of Birch Communications; however, in order to provide the service a new remote terminal would need to be constructed, as well as the installation of approximately 4 miles of fiber optic cables and 0.5 miles of copper cable. Construction of the terminal and cables would be the responsibility of the Bureau (Cardno 2014a). Costs to complete construction and install the cables would be approximately $190,000. 5.8.2.6 Solid Waste The Bureau estimates that an inmate would generate 4 pounds of solid waste per day or 1,460 pounds per year. With an estimated 1,200 inmates, the proposed action would generate 4,800 pounds per day of solid waste, or 1,752,000 pounds per year (876 TPY). The solid waste generated at the federal correctional facility would increase the amount of solid waste taken to the Laurel Ridge Landfill from 320,000 TPY to 320,876 TPY. This increase would not result in the landfill going over its current yearly maximum intake of solid waste; therefore, there would be no adverse impacts to the Laurel Ridge Landfill from implementation of Alternative 2. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.8.3. Mitigation Mitigation for impacts to the gas wells at the Roxana site would require the Bureau to pay the owners of the wells (Hayden Harper and EQT) for the costs associated with closure and abandonment of the wells. The anticipated costs range from $300,000 to $1,000,000 per well based on the remaining production of each well. The anticipated cost to close all 15 wells is $12.75 million (Cardno 2014a; see Appendix D, Enhanced Utility Report). All gas wells on the Roxana site would be permanently closed and abandoned and the pipes relocated according to standards required by federal and state regulations. Groundwater at the Roxana site would not be used for any purpose at the USP or FPC. No other mitigation would be required. CULTURAL RESOURCES An APE was defined to take into consideration both potential direct and indirect effects to cultural resources from implementation of the proposed action at the Roxana site. The APE for Alternative 2 includes the 700-acre (283-hectare) Roxana site and adjacent areas to the north (Figure 5-3). The APE extends beyond the north boundary of the Roxana site because of the potential for visual effects to any historic properties that may be present within the viewshed of the proposed federal correctional facility’s one- to four-story buildings. Effects to archaeological resources, however, would be limited to the 300acre (121-hectare) area within the APE where construction (direct ground disturbance) would occur. 5-22 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Affected Environment 5.9.1.1 Archaeological Resources Mapping, aerial photos, and a pedestrian reconnaissance in August 2011 and August 2014 indicated that the Roxana site had been completely disturbed by former surface mining activities. Photo-documentation was conducted at the site; however, no subsurface testing was completed. In addition, background research indicated that no previously identified archaeological sites were present at the proposed Roxana site. No archaeological resources eligible for listing on the NRHP are present and no further work was recommended at the Roxana site as a result of the 2011 and 2014 archaeological surveys. Concurrence was received from the SHPO on January 24, 2012 and on December 22, 2014 (Appendix A, Agency Coordination). 5.9.1.2 Traditional Cultural Properties Under Section 106 of the NHPA, a federal agency is required to give consideration to issues of traditional religious or cultural areas concerning Native American groups. No TCPs have been identified within the APE for Alternative 2. 5.9.1.3 Architectural Resources The 2011 reconnaissance survey of the Roxana site APE identified two architectural resources for further investigation; the other architectural resources in the APE were not recommended for further work because they were not associated with significant historical or architectural contexts of Letcher County and/or were in poor condition (TEC, Inc. 2011a). An intensive-level survey of two mid-twentieth century square-plan pyramidal houses (LR152 and LR153) was conducted in 2013 to determine the NRHP eligibility of the properties (Figure 5-3; Table 5-14). One of the houses (LR153) also included several domestic and agricultural outbuildings. Both properties were recommended not eligible for listing in the NRHP because they do not meet the NRHP criteria for eligibility (Cardno 2014b). The KHC concurred that both properties are not eligible (KHC 2014) (Appendix A, Agency Coordination). Table 5-14. Architectural Resources in the Roxana Site APE Evaluated for NRHP Eligibility Site Number LR152 LR153 Property Name Pearl Whitaker House George Whitaker House Year Built Ca. 1940 1940 Description Square-plan pyramidal house Square-plan pyramidal house and nine outbuildings NRHP Eligibility Not Eligible Not Eligible Environmental Consequences The cultural resources surveys for the proposed action did not identify any archaeological sites or architectural resources eligible for inclusion in the NRHP in the APE for the Roxana site. Therefore, Alternative 2 would have no effect on NRHP-listed or eligible cultural resources. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.9.3. Mitigation Alternative 2 would have no impact to NRHP-listed or eligible cultural resources; therefore, no mitigation is required. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-23 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 5-3. Architectural Resources Evaluated in the APE for Alternative 2 5-24 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky WATER RESOURCES Affected Environment 5.10.1.1 Surface Water The Roxana site is situated on top of a plateau, which is the result of surface mining of a portion of the mountain. As a result of the mining, the hydrology of the site has been greatly disturbed. There are several ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial unnamed, small streams identified and mapped within the proposed project area. Additionally, an open water wetland (pond) comprising approximately 0.41 acres (0.17 hectares) is located along the eastern boundary, north of Rise Branch. The Roxana site lies in the same watershed as the Payne Gap site. The HUC units are the Ohio Region (HUC 05); Kentucky-Licking Subregion (HUC 0510); the Kentucky River Basin (HUC 051002); and the North Fork Kentucky River Watershed (HUC 05100201) (USEPA 2013a). The Roxana site contains surface water features including headwater intermittent and perennial streams. Water quality of the streams on the Roxana site has not been assessed by the USEPA, and there are no identified impaired waters or TMDLs for the Roxana site (USEPA 2013a). The closest assessed water body to the Roxana site is the North Fork of the Kentucky River, located approximately 0.2 miles north of the site on the opposite side of KY 588/KY 160. The North Fork of the Kentucky River was assessed for primary contact recreation and was determined to be impaired as a result of elevated levels of fecal coliform. The elevated levels of fecal coliform were believed to be the result of point source discharges from sewage package plants (USEPA 2013a). Mining operations have the potential to affect water quality of the North Fork Kentucky River Watershed. There are five active mining operations in the watershed. These mining operations have no direct impacts on water quality of the Roxana site due to their distance (approximately 1 mile or greater) and hydrological separation from the site. Because municipally supplied water is drawn from the North Fork in Letcher County, indirect impacts to public health have the potential to occur if drinking water quality were to be compromised by coal mining or other activities in the North Fork watershed. The water supply would need be treated to meet drinking water standards prior to distribution to consumers. If drinking water standards cannot be met, a public health advisory would be issued and consumers would be advised as to how to further treat the water at home (i.e. boiling) or a consumption ban would be implemented and consumers would be provided with bottled water (KDEP 2015). The potable water supply is discussed further in Section 5.8, Infrastructure and Utilities. Regular post-mining surface water monitoring was conducted on the Roxana site in the mid-1990s. Results from mining permit-related water quality reports from 1993 to 1995 show the waters exhibited net alkalinity and moderate pH values, indicating alkaline-rich minerals that neutralize acid production, and low iron and manganese, indicating low dissolved metals concentrations in general (Cardno 2016a). This condition signifies that any acidity generated upon initial exposure of the rock was fully neutralized by the inherent alkalinity, such that acidic and/or metals-rich discharges did not occur. An investigation of the previous surface mining-related overburden at the Roxana site was conducted in November 2015 and finalized in January 2016 (see Appendix H) to determine the geochemical character of the rock rubble and whether its excavation and on-site relocation for development of the proposed federal correctional facility would be likely to generate material environmental impacts on the site and/or to streams receiving drainage from the redistributed material. The investigation included subsurface 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-25 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky sampling of the rubble material itself and sampling of existing water discharges on the site to document existing surface and groundwater quality and determine whether there is likelihood of acid mine drainage, including dissolution of metals of possible health concern. For the water sampling, water samples were collected from six different locations on the site: the discharges of three hollow fills in the east, southeast, and northwest portions of the site, the eastern hollow fill discharge below the pond, and the mouths of the two small streams flowing westerly from the site. The water samples were analyzed for general chemistry including metals to document existing water quality and identify indications of water quality impacts from contact with the mine overburden. Analysis of the water samples shows the existing water in the hollow fill discharges contains elevated levels of total dissolved solids and sulfate, indicating a high degree of weathering has occurred since mining and the continued flushing out of weathering-produced dissolved sulfidic minerals. However, the water also contains substantial acid-neutralizing minerals (principally calcium and magnesium), which fully neutralize any acidic drainage generated during the weathering process. Specifically, the results of the samples indicate there are no concentrations of metals at levels of human health concern in water that has percolated through the rock rubble (Cardno 2016a). The subsurface sampling of the rock rubble consisted of drilling two boreholes each at the proposed locations of the USP, the FPC, and the Outside Warehouse and Central Utility Plant. Forty-five rock samples from the six borings were tested to determine the acid-production or acid-neutralization potential of the mine overburden material. The results of the boring sample tests indicate the sampled material is relatively low in sulfur content, with very low potential to generate acidic drainage. Additionally, the rock that would be excavated and relocated is generally well-weathered material that contains more acidneutralizing than acid-generating potential, and thus, is likely to produce neutral or somewhat alkaline drainage upon weathering, rather than acid drainage (Cardno 2016a). That finding is consistent with that of the water sampling program. No significant change in water quality is expected to result from redistribution of the rubble material. A detailed report on the results of the investigation is provided in Appendix H, Investigation of Rock Rubble Material, Roxana Site. 5.10.1.2 Wetlands Site-specific wetland data was collected through onsite field work, aerial photographs, topographic maps, NWI wetland maps, and Natural Resources Conservation Service soil surveys. Wetland delineations on the Roxana site were conducted in May 2011 and August 2014, and included identification of waters of the U.S. Approximately 3.1 acres (1.3 hectares) of wetlands were delineated on the Roxana site. The majority of the wetlands are located within the east and west sides of the south-central portion of the site. In addition, several intermittent, perennial, and ephemeral streams were delineated on site (TEC, Inc. 2011c; Cardno 2014c). Hydrology supporting the wetlands on the Roxana site is a result of surface runoff from the surrounding lands, groundwater, and direct precipitation. Dominant vegetation within the wetlands identified on the Roxana site is typified by broadleaf cattail, black willow, spicebush (Lindera benzoin), Nepalese browntop (Microstegium vimineum), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), and woolgrass. Table 5-15 summarizes acres by wetland type and linear feet of jurisdictional stream within the Roxana site. Figure 5-4 depicts wetlands and streams delineated within the Roxana site. 5-26 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 5-15. Wetland and Streams Delineated at Roxana Feature Type Wetlands Palustrine Emergent Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Palustrine Forested Palustrine Upland Island Streams Jurisdictional Stream Non-Jurisdictional Stream Roxana Site Acres/Hectares Linear Feet Total Notes: N/A = Not Applicable. 5.10.1.3 0.8/0.3 1.4/0.6 0.7/0.3 0.2/0.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.1/1.3 8,383 182 8,565 Groundwater There are no groundwater wells on the Roxana site, but there is a domestic single household well located approximately 250 feet north of the site at an elevation of 1,200 feet with a depth to water of 80 feet (KGS 2013). Groundwater flow tends to follow the sloped topography and is assumed to flow to the north, east, and west towards the North Fork Kentucky River, Kings Creek, and Tolson Branch, respectively. Variations in groundwater conditions are expected based on location and elevation across the site, seasonal conditions, and weather patterns. The Roxana site is underlain by subsurface geology of the Breathitt Group, which is comprised of the Pikeville Formation and the Hyden Formation, and the Four Corners Formation. The Breathitt Group yields more than 500 gallons of groundwater per day in more than three-quarters of the wells drilled in valley bottoms, more than 500 gallons per day in about three-quarters of the wells on hillsides, and more than 100 gallons per day to nearly all wells on ridges within Letcher County (KGS 2013). There are no sole source aquifers underlying the site (USEPA 2013b). The quality of the groundwater in Letcher County ranges from moderately hard in most of the county to moderately soft south of Pine Mountain. Naturally occurring contaminants present in the groundwater consist of sulfate, salt (sodium chloride), iron, and manganese (KGS 2013). According to the Kentucky Division of Water, Groundwater Branch, Letcher County has areas of moderate and high sensitivity to groundwater pollution. The hydrogeologic sensitivity reflects the ease and speed with which a contaminant can move into and within a groundwater system. The hydrogeologic sensitivity of Letcher County has been assigned a value of three out of five, with five being the most susceptible to groundwater pollution and one being the least susceptible. The region is given a three due to subcutaneous drain and enlarged fractures influence groundwater recharge, fissure networks influence flow, and bidirectional dispersal patterns influence overall dispersion (KDEP 1994). As described above in Section 5.10.1.1, Surface Water, the rock overburden from previous surface mining consists of well-weathered material with significant amounts of acid-neutralizing minerals. The six water samples from the site confirm that any acid production from the weathering process has been completely neutralized (refer to Appendix H, Investigation of Rock Rubble Material, Roxana Site). Analysis of the results of the water samples also indicates there has been no impact to groundwater quality from the existing gas wells within the site (refer to Section 5.8.1.3, Natural Gas), as the samples contain very low concentrations of sodium, chloride, and barium, parameters that are often indicators of leakage from gas or oil wells (Cardno 2016a). 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-27 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Figure 5-4. Roxana Wetlands and Streams 5-28 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 5.10.1.4 Floodplains The Roxana site is not located in a 100-year floodplain (Environmental Data Resources 2015). Environmental Consequences 5.10.2.1 Surface Water It is not anticipated that water quality of nearby streams and wetlands would be adversely impacted by on site construction. BMPs would be implemented based on an approved erosion and sediment control plan, which would minimize sediment and pollutants from the construction site being carried into nearby water courses. An investigation of the previous surface mining-related overburden at the Roxana site and water discharges at the hollow fills around the perimeter of the reclaimed mine site indicates a very low likelihood that acid mine drainage would be generated by the excavation and on-site relocation of the rock material for development of the proposed federal correctional facility (Appendix H, Investigation of Rock Rubble Material, Roxana Site). The sampled rock from the deep borings consists of well-weathered, lowreactivity material exhibiting more acid-neutralizing potential than acid-generating potential, and poses no significant risk of producing acidic drainage or drainage with significant levels of dissolved metals of concern to human health in occupancy of the site. Furthermore, there are no concentrations of metals at levels of potential human health concern in water that has drained through the rubble rock material. The water quality of current drainage is similar to that which existed after surface mining operations ended, and would not be likely to change by the proposed site development activities. Therefore, under Alternative 2, construction of the USP and FPC would not result in significant impacts to surface water quality. 5.10.2.2 Wetlands Implementation of the proposed action at the Roxana site would result in permanent impacts to approximately 4,117 linear feet of stream, 0.37 acres (0.15 hectares) of forested wetlands, 0.7 acres (0.28 hectares) of emergent wetlands, and 1.38 acres (0.56 hectares) of scrub-shrub wetlands. These impacts would be to the streams and wetlands delineated in 2011 and 2014 (Table 5-15) and would result primarily from the excavation and grading activities that would be required to prepare the site for the development of the USP, FPC, ancillary buildings, and roads. 5.10.2.3 Groundwater The Bureau would prepare and implement a groundwater protection plan in accordance with Kentucky regulations (401 KAR 5:037) to protect groundwater quality during construction and operation of the federal correctional facility under Alternative 2. The site-specific groundwater protection plan would describe the activities that have the potential to pollute groundwater and include the measures and practices that will be implemented during construction and operation of the facility such as providing secondary containment for petroleum storage tanks. Groundwater at the Roxana site would not be used for any purpose at the USP or FPC; therefore, there would not be human health impacts associated with groundwater use, nor would there be direct or indirect impacts to groundwater quantity. Therefore, construction and operation of the USP and FPC under Alternative 2 would have no significant impacts related to groundwater. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-29 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky An investigation of the previous surface mining-related overburden on the Roxana site and water discharges at the hollow fills around the perimeter of the reclaimed mine site indicates a very low likelihood that acid mine drainage would be generated by the excavation and on-site relocation of the rock material for development of the proposed federal correctional facility (Appendix H, Investigation of Rock Rubble Material, Roxana Site). The sampled rock from the deep borings consists of well-weathered, lowreactivity material exhibiting more acid-neutralizing potential than acid-generating potential, and poses no significant risk of producing acidic drainage or drainage with significant levels of dissolved metals of concern to human health in occupancy of the site. Furthermore, there are no concentrations of metals at levels of potential human health concern in water that has drained through the rubble rock material. The water quality of current drainage is similar to that which existed after surface mining operations ended, and would not be likely to change by the proposed site development activities. Therefore, under Alternative 2, construction of the USP and FPC would not result in significant impacts to groundwater quality. As discussed in Section 5.8.2.3, Natural Gas, under Alternative 2 the gas wells on the Roxana site would be permanently closed and plugged, and associated transmission lines relocated. The test results of the water discharge samples from the Roxana site reveal that the water includes very low concentrations of sodium, chloride, and barium. This finding indicates that there is no significant or detectable impact from deep saline waters that may have been encountered with installation of the gas wells at the site. Their closure would ensure that no such impact is likely to occur in the future. 5.10.2.4 Floodplains The Roxana site is not located within a 100-year floodplain; therefore, no impacts to floodplains would occur under Alternative 2. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.10.3. Mitigation The Bureau met with the USACE on May 19, 2015 to discuss mitigation for the Roxana site. Wetland mitigation would be paid into an in-lieu fee fund. Wetland impact mitigation is calculated by adding total acreage of wetlands to be impacted and multiplying by 2. Wetland impacts on the Roxana site total 2.43 acres X 2 = 4.86 AMUs (Adjusted Mitigation Units) to be purchased. To determine the cost associated with wetland mitigation, the Bureau would contact the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources to determine the cost of AMUs at the time of purchase. The last recent quote was $43,000 per AMU, which would equate to $208,980 for wetland impact mitigation at the Roxana Site. These rates may increase depending on when the Section 404 permit is acquired. Stream mitigation would be based on Ecological Integrity Units (EIU). The EIU is calculated based on the stream rating (assessed using the USEPA’s Rapid Bioassessment Protocol Sheets). To account for cumulative and temporary impacts, the EIU is multiplied by 1.2 (20 percent cumulative and temporary impacts); the result is a total of 1,414 EIUs. The current In Lieu Fee Credits are $755 per credit (EIU). Therefore, the total for stream mitigation would be $1,067,570 at current 2015 rates. When construction funding becomes available, the Section 404 permit would be applied for and mitigation costs would be updated according to the current mitigation rates and permit requirements. Mitigation In Lieu Fees for stream and wetland mitigation combined, using 2015 In Lieu Fee rates would total $1,276,550. 5-30 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Affected Environment 5.11.1.1 Vegetation A large portion of the Roxana site has been disturbed by historic mining activities, which created a relatively level area on the mountaintop. A site visit indicated a level portion of the site is farmed and portions not under agriculture are routinely bushhogged or are dominated by scrub shrub vegetation (e.g., autumn olive, multiflora rose, etc.). The mountain slopes are primarily forested with the exception of slopes created by fill from mining; these slopes are dominated by invasive species such as autumn olive and paradise tree (Ailanthus altissima). Upland vegetation includes northern red oak, eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), sericea lespedeza, paradise tree, Allegheny blackberry, Virginia pine (Pinus virgininana), bluestem broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), tuliptree, American beech, Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), Ohio buckeye (Aesculus glabra), red maple (Acer rubrum), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica), and Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides). Wetland vegetation at the Roxana site includes American sycamore, woolgrass, black willow, spicebush, Nepalese browntop, small spike falsenettle (Boehemeria cylindrica), and cinnamon fern. 5.11.1.2 Wildlife Non-avian species likely to be found on the Roxana site include coyote (Canis latrans), Virginia opossum (Dipelphis virginiana), American black bear (Ursus americanus), eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans), eastern spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius), white tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), green frog (Rana clamitans melanota), American toad (Bufo americanus), black rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta obsolete), copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix), eastern hognose snake (Heterodon platirhinos), and fence lizard (Sceloporus undulates) (Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources 2013). Representative migratory bird species potentially occurring in Letcher County and within the project area include tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), black-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus erythropthalmus), blue-winged warbler (Vermivora pinus), cerulean warbler (Dendroica cerulea), Kentucky warbler (Oporornis formosus), prairie warbler (Dendroica discolor), Swainson’s warbler (Limnothlypis swainsonii), worm eating warbler (Helmitheros vermivorum), fox sparrow (Passerella iliaca), wood thrush (Hylocichia mustelina), Louisiana waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla), least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus), rusty blackbird (Euphagus carolinus), willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii), loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), pied-billed grebe (Podilymbus podiceps), wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo), and shorteared owl (Asio flammeus) (USFWS 2015a). 5.11.1.3 Threatened and Endangered Species Due to the number of state-listed species listed by Kentucky as potentially occurring in Letcher County, the following section focuses on federally listed species. A full list of listed species and their status is included in Table 5-16. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-31 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 5-16. State and Federal Report of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Plants, and Animals of Letcher County, Kentucky Scientific Name Liverworts Plagiochila caduciloba Mosses Anomodon rugelii Brachythecium populeum Cirriphyllum piliferum Dicranodontium asperulum Entodon brevisetus Neckera pennata Oncophorus raui Polytrichum pallidisetum Polytrichum strictum Sphagnum quinquefarium Vascular Plants Adlumia fungosa Angelica triquinata Baptisia tinctoria Botrychium matricariifolium Boykinia aconitifolia Carex aestivalis Carex appalachica Castanea pumila Circaea alpine Corydalis sempervirens Cymophyllus fraserianus Cypripedium parviflorum Eupatorium steelei Gentiana decora Hexastylis contracta Houstonia serpyllifolia Hydrophyllum virginianum Juglans cinerea Leucothoe recurve Lilium superbum Listera smallii Monotropsis odorata Oenothera oakesiana Oenothera perennis Orontium aquaticum Pogonia ophioglossoides Prosartes maculate Sanguisorba Canadensis Saxifraga michauxii Saxifraga micranthidifolia Solidago curtisii Trillium undulatum Terrestrial Snails Glyphyalinia rhoadsi Neohelix dentifera Patera panselenus 5-32 Common Name Status (State/Federal) Gorge Leafy Liverwort E/N None Matted Feather Moss None None None None None A Hair Cap Moss None Five-ranked Bogmoss T/N E/N T/N E/N E/N T/N E/N T/N E/N E/N Allegheny-vine Filmy Angelica Yellow Wild Indigo Matricary Grape-fern Brook Saxifrage Summer Sedge Appalachian Sedge Allegheny Chinkapin Small Enchanter’s Nightshade Rock Harlequin Fraser’s Sedge Small Yellow Lady’s-slipper Steele’s Joe-pye-weed Showy Gentian Southern Heartleaf Michaux’s Bluets Eastern Waterleaf White Walnut Red-twig Doghobble Turk’s Cap Lily Kidney-leaf Twayblade Sweet Pinesap Evening Primrose Small Sundrops Golden Club Rose Pogonia Nodding Mandarin Canada Burnet Michaux’s Saxifrage Lettuce-leaf Saxifrage Curtis’ Goldenrod Painted Trillium H/N E/N T/N E/N E/N E/N T/N T/N S/N S/N E/N T/N T/N S/N E/SOMC E/N T/N T/SOMC E/N T/N T/N T/SOMC H/N E/N T/N E/N S/N E/N T/N E/N S/N T/N Sculpted Glyph Big-tooth Whitelip Virginia Bladetooth T/N T/N S/N 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Table 5-16. State and Federal Report of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Plants, and Animals of Letcher County, Kentucky Scientific Name Crustaceans Cambarus bunting Cambarus parvoculus Insects Amphiagrion saucium Calephelis borealis Erora laeta Litobrancha recurvate Papaipema speciosissima Phyciodes batesii Stylurus notatus Stylurus scudderi Fishes Chrosomus cumberlandensis Etheostoma sagitta spilotum Amphibians Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis Plethodon wehrlei Birds Accipiter striatus Corvus corax Pheucticus ludovicianus Tyto alba Vermivora chrysoptera Mammals Clethrionomys gapperi maurus Corynorhinus rafinesquii Mustela nivalis Myotis grisescens Myotis leibii Myotis septentrionalis Myotis sodalis Sorex cinereus Sorex dispar blitchi Spilogale putorius Ursus americanus Common Name Status (State/Federal) Longclaw Crayfish Mountain Midget Crayfish S/N T/N Eastern Red Damsel Northern Metalmark T Early Hairstreak A Burrowing Mayfly Osmunda Borer Moth Tawny Crescent Elusive Clubtail Zebra Clubtail E/N T/N T/N S/N E/N H/SOMC E/SOMC E/N Blackside Dace Kentucky Arrow Darter T/LT S/PT Eastern Hellbender E/SOMC Wehrle’s Salamander E/N Sharp-shinned Hawk Common Raven Rose-breasted Grosbeak Barn Owl Golden-winged Warbler S/N T/N S/N S/N T/SOMC Kentucky Red-backed Vole Rafinesque’s Big-eared Bat Least Weasel Gray Bat Eastern Small-footed Myotis Northern Long-Eared Bat Indiana Bat Cinereus Shrew Long-tailed Shrew Eastern Spotted Skunk American Black Bear S/SOMC S/SOMC S/N T/E T/SOMC E/T E/E S/N E/N S/N S/N Notes: E = Endangered, H = Historical, LT = Listed as Threatened, N = None, PT = Proposed Threatened, T = Threatened, S = Special Concern, SOMC = Species of Management Concern. Sources: Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission 2014; USFWS 2014, 2015c, d. Based on coordination with the USFWS, four federally listed species have the potential to occur within the Roxana site: gray bat, Indiana bat, northern long-eared bat, and Kentucky arrow darter (USFWS 2014). The gray bat is federally listed as endangered and listed by Kentucky as threatened. The gray bat roosts in caves throughout the year although suitable caves are rare. For winter hibernacula the bats require vertical caves with domed halls. The winter caves must also have a temperature of between 6 and 11 degrees Celsius. Forested areas along the banks of streams and lakes provide important protection for adults and young. Summer caves are always within 1 kilometer (0.62 mile) of a river or reservoir where the bats 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-33 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky forage. Forests provide important feeding areas for young bats, which will not forage in areas where the forests have been cleared (Natureserve 2013a). The Indiana bat is federally and state-listed as endangered. The Indiana bat hibernates in caves; however, maternity sites are generally behind loose bark of dead or dying trees or in tree cavities. They forage in riparian areas, upland forests, ponds, and fields, but forested landscapes are the most important habitat. They typically hibernate in the coldest area of a cave to ensure a low enough metabolic rate in order to conserve fat reserves throughout the winter; however, they will move away from areas that dip below freezing. Known roost tree species include elm, oak, beech, hickory, maple, ash, sassafras, birch, sycamore, locust, aspen, cottonwood, pine, and hemlock with a preference for trees with exfoliating bark (Natureserve 2013b). The northern long-eared bat was listed as threatened under the ESA in April 2015 and is listed by Kentucky as endangered. The northern long-eared bat hibernates in the small cracks and crevices of caves and mines that have large passages and relatively constant, cool temperatures with high humidity and no air currents. During the summer they roost singly or in colonies underneath bark or in cavities, crevices, or hollows of both live and dead trees within forests, woodlots with dense or loose aggregates of trees, riparian forests, and other wooded corridors. Males or non-reproductive females may also roost in caves or mines. In addition, northern long-eared bats have been observed roosting in structures such as barns and bridges. They are not considered to be a long-distance migrant, as they typically migrate 35–55 miles between their winter hibernacula and summer habitat (USFWS 2015b). Based on coordination with the USFWS, the Roxana site is in known P1/P2 swarming habitat for the Indiana bat (USFWS 2014). A Phase I bat survey conducted in December 2014 identified the presence of summer habitat for Indiana, northern long-eared and gray bats, but no potential winter habitat (i.e., caves or hibernacula) for Indiana, northern long-eared, and gray bats (Copperhead Environmental Consulting 2015). The USFWS concurred with the findings of the Phase I survey (Appendix A, Agency Coordination). The Kentucky arrow darter was proposed for listing as a threatened species under the ESA in September 2015 (USFWS 2015c). The Kentucky arrow darter is known to exist in the upper Kentucky River basin. Habitat for the species consists of pools and transitional areas between riffles and pools in moderate to high gradient streams (USFWS 2015c). The streams within the Roxana site are primarily small channels that do not contain riffle and pool complexes (USFWS 2013). There is no federally designated critical habitat on the Roxana site (USFWS 2013). Environmental Consequences 5.11.2.1 Vegetation Direct impacts to vegetation would occur under Alternative 2 as approximately 93 acres (38 hectares) of forested area would be cleared on the Roxana site for excavation and grading activities required to prepare the site for development. 5.11.2.2 Wildlife Wildlife species found on the Roxana site would likely be displaced during construction activities due to the loss of habitat and increases in noise. However, approximately 607 acres (246 hectares) of the site would remain undisturbed and continue to provide habitat, including breeding and foraging areas, for wildlife species found on-site. Additionally, the site is surrounded by similar habitat that could accommodate species that are displaced by construction activities. Based on the available habitat that 5-34 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky would remain on site and habitat adjacent to the site (Jefferson National Forest), it is anticipated that these impacts would not adversely affect wildlife species that are currently present on-site. Use of the non-lethal/lethal fence has the potential to result in adverse impacts to small animals and avian species, should they pass through the outer fences and into the area of the non-lethal/lethal fence. 5.11.2.3 Threatened and Endangered Species Implementation of the proposed action at the Roxana site has the potential to impact the federally listed Indiana bat and northern long-eared bat. A Phase I bat habitat survey was conducted for Indiana, northern long-eared, and gray bats. Based on the conceptual design, the proposed action would impact approximately 93 acres (38 hectares) of potential summer roosting and foraging habitat for the Indiana bat and northern long-eared bat and potential summer foraging habitat for the gray bat at the Roxana site. The survey did not identify suitable winter roosting habitat for Indiana and northern long-eared bats or summer and winter roosting habitat for gray bats at the Roxana site. Therefore, the Bureau determined Alternative 2 may affect, is likely to adversely affect the Indiana bat and the northern long-eared bat. Adverse effects to both bat species from nighttime light pollution and glare may also occur. Indirect impacts may result from the noise from the proposed outdoor firing range. The Bureau met with the USFWS on May 20, 2015 to discuss additional studies and mitigation (Appendix A, Agency Coordination). It is not anticipated that the Kentucky arrow darter would be impacted by implementation of the proposed action at the Roxana site. The streams within the Roxana site are small channels and do not contain riffle pool complexes. Additionally, conductivity measurements were taken within streams on the project site in June 2015. Conductivity measurements were taken within one stream that contained flow and the result was a conductivity of 332 µS. Studies have demonstrated that Kentucky arrow darters are not likely to be present when conductivity levels exceed approximately 250 µS (USFWS 2010). Therefore, no significant impacts to the Kentucky arrow darter are anticipated under Alternative 2. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.11.3. Mitigation Mitigation measures for construction impacts to vegetation and wildlife would include minimizing disturbance of existing vegetation to the greatest extent possible. An open area with a direct line of site is required for the areas surrounding the USP and FPC; however, upon completion of construction, disturbed areas would be re-vegetated with native, non-invasive plants to the maximum extent possible while maintaining the Bureau’s site requirements. The USFWS issued comments on the July 2015 Final EIS and stated that the Bureau sufficiently identified the potential impacts to threatened and endangered species as a result of the proposed project (refer to Appendix E-2 for correspondence from the USFWS). The Bureau will mitigate for take of Indiana bats and northern long-eared bats through a Conservation Memorandum of Agreement (CMOA) following the guidance provided in the USFWS’s April 2015 Conservation Strategy for Forest Dwelling Bats in the Commonwealth of Kentucky (Conservation Strategy). The Biological Opinion that supports the Conservation Strategy concludes with a “non-jeopardy” determination for adverse effects to the Indiana bat and the northern long-eared bat and exempts the take resulting from the habitat removal specified in the CMOA (the CMOA does not cover tree removal in June and July). Once the CMOA has been completed, the Bureau will be in compliance for these species for this project. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-35 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Under the CMOA, the Bureau would pay into the Imperiled Bat Conservation Fund for summer roosting habitat impacted under Alternative 2. Payment into the fund would be based on the time of year habitat is removed. Based on 2015 rates, mitigation costs would range from $732,375 to $1,024,325. The Imperiled Bat Conservation Fund would then provide the mitigation fees to the Kentucky Natural Lands Trust to purchase and protect important bat habitat. The Bureau would implement conservation measures to avoid and minimize potential effects of site lighting on the Indiana bat and northern long-eared bat during construction and operations. To maintain the character of the surrounding rural environment, hooded lights with reflectors would be used to completely conceal the light source above the rim of the fixture, and which would result in maximum down-lighting effects. Illumination of forest will be kept to an absolute minimum. In addition, all outdoor construction activities would be conducted during daylight hours in known or suitable summer habitat to avoid harassment of foraging Indiana and northern long-eared bats (April 15 through October 31). The Bureau has conducted prior impact assessments for the installation of non-lethal/lethal fences, especially for potential impacts to avian and small mammal species (Bureau 2009). These prior assessments have found less than significant adverse impacts; consequently, less than significant impacts are anticipated with the non-lethal/lethal fence to be installed as part of this proposed action. However, following activation of the non-lethal/lethal fence, the Bureau would monitor the fence line to determine if wildlife, particularly avian species, is being adversely affected. The Bureau would collect data regarding these occurrences including identification of species and photographs. The data would be used to document and analyze emerging trends. If adverse effects were identified, the Bureau would contact the USFWS and appropriate state wildlife agencies to determine if changes to the operation of the fence are warranted. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE Affected Environment 5.12.1.1 Hazardous Materials The Roxana site is located in a relatively undeveloped area. No hazardous materials are known to be in storage or in use in this area. According to the USEPA “Cleanups In My Community” mapping tool, there are no Brownfield, Superfund, or RCRA Corrective Action sites in the vicinity of the Roxana site. No sites in the town of Roxana were listed in the USEPA’s TSCA or TRI databases. Site visits conducted in 2011, 2013, and 2014 did not observe any hazardous wastes or evidence of their presence (i.e., stressed vegetation, stained soils, drums) on the site. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed on the Roxana site in July 2015. The Environmental Site Assessment was conducted in accordance with the American Society for Materials and Testing International Designation: E1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM E1527-13). The goal of the assessment was to identify RECs on the Roxana site. An REC is defined in ASTM E1527-13 as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” An REC includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. De minimis conditions are not RECs, generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment, and generally would not be 5-36 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Structures on the Roxana site were also assessed for the potential presence of asbestos-containing material, lead-based paint, and radon, although no samples were collected during the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Federal, state, and local databases were searched and three of the numerous databases, the Kentucky State Hazardous Waste Sites (KY SHWS), Kentucky Underground Storage Tank (KY UST), and KY SPILLS databases, contained information relevant to the Roxana site. The KY SHWS database is Kentucky’s equivalent of the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS). These sites may or may not already be listed on the CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. One KY SHWS site was reported to be located over 1 mile from the Roxana site. The Kentucky West Virginia Gas Pipeline (well line W-837) is located 1.215 miles north-northwest of the Roxana site. According to the report, this gas line has been closed and the site restored. Therefore, it would not have any impact on site conditions at the Roxana site. The KY UST database contains information regarding USTs regulated under Subtitle I of RCRA that must be registered with the commonwealth. Two registered USTs were reported to occur within 0.125 mile of the Roxana site. The Lee Gentry property, located at Highway 588 West, approximately 0.014 mile north-northeast of the site, was reported to contain a 560-gallon diesel UST and a 1,000-gallon gasoline UST. The USTs were reportedly removed in March 1998. This property is located at a lower elevation than the Roxana site, and consequently, would not have an impact on site conditions. The John W. Ison Grocery, located at 14858 Highway 160, approximately 0.115 miles east of the site, was reported to contain one 1,000-gallon, one 2,000-gallon, and two 3,000-gallon gasoline USTs. The 1,000-gallon and 2,000-gallon USTs were reportedly removed in July 1994 and the 3,000-gallon USTs were reportedly removed in January 2014. This property is located at a lower elevation than the Roxana site and consequently, would not have an impact on site conditions. The KY SPILLS database is a listing of spill and/or release related incidents. One spill was reported to have occurred within 0.25 mile of the Roxana site in 2004. According to the report, a coal company was oiling a haul road resulting in soil contamination on the site. The incident was reported as being in compliance. As a result, the spill would not have any impacts on the Roxana site that would constitute a REC. A site inspection of the property was conducted on July 20 and 21, 2015, in association with the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Relevant observations are described in the following paragraphs. Several large ASTs were observed on the Roxana site. A storage tank was considered to be an REC due to the fact that an open drainage valve presented a material threat of release. The tank was associated with an active oil extraction operation and, therefore, was assumed to contain petroleum crude oil, as placarded. A large plastic oil storage tank was observed approximately 1,000 feet east of a natural gas compressor station and was damaged resulting in a release of a portion of its contents. This AST is within a lined and bermed area; however, the liner was observed to have deteriorated and was essentially ineffective. This site was considered to be an REC. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-37 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky The natural gas compressor station was observed to have experienced a release, and cleanup methods to address the leak were observed to be insufficient. The compressor station and surrounding soils are considered to be an REC. Additionally, two open topped containers of petroleum were observed adjacent to the compressor station and, as such, presented a material threat of release. The containers and the compressor station were considered to be RECs. Two transformers on the site could not be discounted as containing PCBs. No placarding was observed on either transformer. As such, these transformers were assumed to contain PCBs and were considered RECs. Appendix G contains the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (July 2015) for the Roxana site. Following recommendations contained in the Phase I, a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment was conducted in November 2015 and concluded in February 2016 to assess the conditions at each of the aforementioned RECs (see Appendix G, Environmental Site Assessments). Soil samples were collected and analyzed to determine the absence or presence of environmental contamination both in vertical and horizontal contexts, as appropriate. Groundwater was not encountered during sample collected so no groundwater samples were collected or analyzed. The results of the soil chemical analyses were compared to the USEPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs), used in accordance with 401 KAR 100:030, Remediation Requirements, and with standards established by the Commonwealth of Kentucky to determine the absence/presence of contaminants of concern. Arsenic was detected in all soil samples collected at the identified RECs at concentrations well above the USEPA RSL. With regards to inorganic compounds (i.e., metals), the Commonwealth of Kentucky provides guidance for establishing background concentrations in the Kentucky Guidance for Ambient Background Assessment (January 8, 2004; as found in KDEP 2009, Appendix B). According to the Kentucky Guidance, surface and subsurface site data should be compared with the generic statewide ambient background numbers and the following three criteria should be used to demonstrate whether or not the site data is background (i.e., not attributable to an identifiable release): 1. The mean site concentration for inorganic constituents must be below the 95 percent Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) of the mean concentrations of background for inorganic constituents 2. At least half of the data points should be less than the 60th percentile 3. No data points should be above the upper bound value (95th percentile) Table 5-17 presents the background concentration numbers for Kentucky for arsenic. Table 5-17. Generic Statewide Ambient Background Concentrations for Arsenic Mean (µg/kg) 8,900 95% UCL of Mean (µg/kg) 9,400 60th Percentile (µg/kg) 8,300 90th Percentile (µg/kg) 21,200 Note: µg/kg = micrograms per kilogram. Source: KDEP 2009, Appendix B. Arsenic concentrations in the collected samples for the RECs ranged between “Not Detected” and 7,790 µg/kg. Because all of the detected arsenic values fall below the mean generic statewide ambient background concentration, the 95 percent UCL of mean, the 60th percentile, and the 95th percentile, arsenic concentrations can be attributed to background conditions and, as such, arsenic is not a contaminant of concern on the Roxana site. 5-38 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky The results of the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment also indicated that soils at three of the REC locations on the Roxana site have been adversely impacted by petroleum: the AST open drain valve, the damaged AST, and the natural gas compressor station. Exceedances of Kentucky petroleum standards, as set forth in 401 KAR 100:030 for petroleum releases not regulated under the underground storage tank program, were observed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons at each of these locations. Contaminated soils on these cited areas of the subject property are limited to the top 2 feet of soil or less and are not considered hazardous or require special handling (Cardno 2016b). 5.12.1.2 Hazardous Wastes No hazardous wastes are known to be stored on the Roxana site or generated in this area. According to the USEPA’s “Cleanups In My Community” mapping tool, there are no Brownfield, Superfund, or RCRA Corrective Action sites in the vicinity of the Roxana site. No sites in the town of Roxana were listed in the USEPA’s TSCA, TRI, or RCRA databases. Three sites were listed in the USEPA’s RCRA database: Roxana BP, Coastal Coal Company LLC, and Enterprise Mining Company LLC. The Roxana BP site is a service station located approximately 500 feet east of the proposed Roxana site and is unlikely to impact site conditions based on the topography and inferred hydrology of the area. The Coastal Coal and Enterprise Mining sites are located over a mile to the east of the proposed Roxana site and are also unlikely to impact site conditions based on the topography and inferred hydrology of the area. Site visits conducted in 2011, 2013, and 2014 did not observe any hazardous wastes or evidence of their presence (i.e., stressed vegetation, stained soils, drums, batteries) on the site and no evidence of acid mine drainage was observed. Coal mining occurs in Letcher County; however, no active mining sites are located in the vicinity of the proposed Roxana site. Maps of active mines in Kentucky prepared by the Kentucky Department of Energy Development and Independence and the Kentucky Geological Survey were reviewed (KGS 2015) and cross referenced with maps prepared by the Kentucky Mine Mapping Information System to determine their current status. No currently active mines were found within a 1-mile radius of the proposed correctional facility site. Therefore, coal mining in the area does not affect the environment of the Roxana site. Additional investigations using the Coal Impoundment Location and Information System (National Technology Transfer Center at Wheeling Jesuit University 2009) also indicate that there are no active coal mines, coal processing facilities, or waste disposal sites on the Roxana site or within a 1-mile radius of the proposed site. According to the Kentucky Mine Mapping Information System (2008) mine reports, the mines close to the Roxana site are abandoned. While coal is processed at the Old House Branch mine over a mile away, no combustion or disposal of coal ash or other combustion byproducts occurs at the site. Once washed, the ore is trucked off-site to generation plants located elsewhere (Mullins 2015). Additionally, the Old House Branch impoundment is contained within a topographic ridge along its western side while the loading facility is located at a substantially lower elevation than the proposed correctional facility. The presence of the ridge between the impoundment and the Roxana site would act as a barrier and hinder the movement of wind-blown particles generated at the impoundment site. As a result, any fugitive dust generated by the operations of the Old House Branch mine is unlikely to affect the environment of the Roxana site. There is a coal slurry impoundment located approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the Roxana site (Enterprise Mining Company). According to the Coal Impoundment Location and Information System, 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-39 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky the impoundment has a maximum capacity of 50 acre-feet (2,178,000 cubic feet or 16,292,572 gallons). According to the U.S. Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration, no violations have been reported at this facility. In the event of failure, the release of water from this impoundment would have no direct impacts on the Roxana site as the site is hydrologically and topographically separated from the impoundment. If the drinking water supply were to be affected the LCWSD would be required to take steps to meet federal minimum drinking water quality standards. 5.12.1.3 Toxic Substances A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed on the property and several structures were observed to be present. The structures observed on the Roxana site appear to have been constructed in the early 1980s and therefore are not likely to contain lead-based paint or asbestos. However, painted items of undetermined age were observed inside of one structure and may contain lead-based paint. The USEPA classifies Letcher County as having a moderate potential for radon intrusion (Zone 2). Zone 2 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level between 2 and 4 pCi/L. The USEPA action level for radon is 4 pCi/L. Environmental Consequences 5.12.2.1 Hazardous Materials Construction activities would require the use of hazardous materials. The majority of the hazardous materials expected to be used are common to construction and include diesel fuel, gasoline, and propane to fuel the construction equipment; hydraulic fluids, oils, and lubricants; and batteries. The transport and use of hazardous materials would have the potential to result in accidental spills that could adversely impact soil and groundwater on and adjacent to the construction site or along transportation routes. Hazardous materials associated with construction activities would be delivered and stored in a manner that would prevent these materials from leaking, spilling, and potentially polluting soils or groundwater, and in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental and public and occupational health and safety regulations. With the implementation of appropriate handling and management procedures, hazardous materials used during construction would have no significant impacts to the environment. Operation of the proposed correctional facility would require the use of batteries, pesticides, herbicides, paints, solvents, and fluorescent light fixtures. Paints, solvents, pesticides, and herbicides would be used up, and thus, not require disposal. Pesticides and herbicides would be used as part of routine grounds and facility maintenance and would be applied and managed in accordance with applicable regulations and manufacturer instructions. Those hazardous materials that do require disposal would be properly managed and stored in accordance with federal and state regulations. As a result, operation of the proposed correctional facility would have less than significant impacts with regards to hazardous materials. The Phase II Environmental Site Assessment identified that soils at three of the REC locations on the Roxana site have been adversely impacted by petroleum. All areas affected by petroleum releases would be cleaned up to acceptable federal and state standards prior to construction of the proposed federal correctional facility. Specifically, remediation of the petroleum releases would be achieved through removal of the contaminants to acceptable levels based on the current update of the USEPA RSLs and the procedures outlined for ASTs and surface releases in DEP 7079C, Closure Report for Petroleum Releases and Exempt Petroleum Tank Systems (KDEP 2009). Upon decommissioning of the petroleum extraction 5-40 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky operation, the identified contaminated soils would be excavated and disposed of at a permitted disposal facility (i.e., a soil recycling facility or landfill permitted to accept petroleum contaminated soil). The walls and floor of all excavated areas would be sampled to demonstrate compliance with Kentucky cleanup standards for petroleum hydrocarbons in residential areas as per DEP 7079C, Table B. All reports, analytical results, mapping, chain of custody forms, and waste manifests would be submitted to the KDEP, Division of Waste Management, Superfund Branch-Petroleum Cleanup Section in accordance with the procedures outlined for clean closure of ASTs and surface releases in DEP 7079C. 5.12.2.2 Hazardous Wastes Hazardous waste would be generated during construction activities and would include but not be limited to empty containers, spent solvents, waste oil, spill cleanup materials (if used), and lead-acid batteries from construction equipment. Construction contractors would be responsible for safely removing these construction-generated wastes from the construction site and for arranging for recycling or disposal in accordance with applicable regulations. The total monthly generation of hazardous waste during construction is anticipated to be less than 100 kilograms during a calendar month. The construction contractor would be responsible for determining their regulatory status regarding hazardous waste generation during construction, and obtaining and maintaining compliance in accordance with federal and state laws. Hazardous wastes associated with construction activities would be handled and stored in a manner that would minimize human exposure to these materials and prevent these materials from polluting soils or groundwater, and in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental and human health and safety regulations. Adherence to these policies, procedures, and regulations would minimize the potential impacts from exposure and accidental releases during construction. In the event of an accidental release, contaminated media would be treated on-site or would be promptly removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations. With the implementation of appropriate handling and management procedures, hazardous wastes generated during construction would have no significant impacts to the environment. Operation of the USP and FPC is anticipated to generate small volumes of hazardous waste such as petroleum, oils, lubricants, solvents, and batteries. Hazardous wastes would be properly managed and stored in accordance with federal and state regulations. As a result, operation of the proposed correctional facility would have less than significant impacts with regards to hazardous wastes. The outdoor firing range at the proposed USP and FPC would be used an average of once a month for small arms training and maintenance, and would include the use of lead bullets. The range would be designed according to Bureau Technical Design Guidelines, which require incorporating safety baffles, berms, and backstops to contain bullets to a designated area. Impoundments, traps, and other structures would catch lead particles. The design of the firing range would also include stormwater systems to gather runoff and allow infiltration within the range bermed area. This aids in preventing contamination outside of the range itself. To ensure this feature continues to work, regular range maintenance would include adding more soil to the berm and ensuring it is seeded with grass. If there is cause, the berm soil would be sifted to remove the lead. The lead would then be recycled and the soil replaced on the range berm. Bureau institutions with an active firing range use the web-based software TRI-Me to report releases of lead to USEPA. Therefore, firing range operations would have no significant impacts to the environment. 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 5-41 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 5.12.2.3 Toxic Substances Under Alternative 2, facilities intended for human occupancy would be designed to prevent occupant exposures to radon above the USEPA action level of 4 pCi/L. Therefore, there would not be adverse impacts associated with radon under Alternative 2. No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative would be the same as that described in Section 4.12.3. Mitigation Alternative 2 would have no significant impacts to hazardous materials and wastes; therefore, no mitigation is required. 5-42 5.0 Alternative 2 – Roxana March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 6.0 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHORT-TERM USE OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY Regulations for the preparation of Environmental Impact Statements require they address the relationship between short-term use of the environment and the maintenance of long-term productivity. Construction of proposed facilities on the site would last an estimated 36 to 48 months following groundbreaking. Construction would involve clearing and grubbing, excavating and filling, paving, erecting structures, installation of lighting and signage, and landscaping. There would also be temporary disruptions to traffic associated with construction vehicles and equipment utilizing area roadways. It is anticipated that disruptions would be temporary and that construction and operation of the proposed USP and FPC would generate economic productivity in terms of new construction jobs, new payrolls, induced personal income, purchasing of materials, supplies, and services, and potential purchasing of new homes by Bureau staff once the facility opens. The economic viability of the Letcher County, Kentucky region would experience long-term benefits by virtue of the approximately 300 new permanent jobs that would need to be filled at the USP and FPC. 6.0 Relationship Between Short-Term Use and Long-Term Productivity March 2016 6-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) 6-2 6.0 Relationship Between Short-Term Use and Long-Term Productivity March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES Regulations for the preparation of EISs also require they address irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources associated with the proposed action. Construction and operation of the proposed USP and FPC would result in both direct and indirect commitments of resources. In some cases, resources committed would be recovered in a relatively short period of time. In other cases resources would be irreversibly or irretrievably committed by virtue of being consumed or by the apparent limitlessness of the period of their commitment to a specific use. Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources can sometimes be compensated for by the provision of similar resources with substantially the same use or value. Under the proposed action only a portion of the site would be required for the actual construction of the USP and FPC. Resources consumed as a result of the development of the correctional facility would be offset by the creation of the facility and the resulting societal benefits. The use of the developed portion of the land could be considered irretrievably committed. The proposed action would also require the commitment of various construction materials, including cement, aggregate, steel, asphalt, and lumber. There is the potential, however, that these materials could be recycled at some point in the future; therefore, they may not be an irreversible or irretrievable commitment of resources. The proposed action would also require the consumption of fossil fuels and electrical energy during both the construction and operation of the facility and would be considered an irretrievable commitment of these resources. Costs associated with roadway and utility improvements to serve the site are not precisely known at this time; however, these costs would be offset by the direct economic benefits of the total project-related expenditures and the annual operating budget. Over the long term, construction of the proposed facility could result in an increase in the pace of development within Letcher County than would occur if the project were not constructed. Although the nature of such development can be controlled through the application of land use regulations, any induced land development is for all practical purposes, an irreversible and irretrievable commitment of land and materials. 7.0 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources March 2016 7-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) 7-2 7.0 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 8.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS This chapter (1) describes past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions relevant to cumulative impacts, (2) analyzes the incremental interaction the proposed action may have with other actions, and, (3) evaluates cumulative impacts potentially resulting from these interactions. The definition of cumulative impacts was discussed in Section 3.13, Cumulative Impact Analysis. PAST, PRESENT, AND REASONABLY FORESEEABLE FUTURE ACTIONS This section identifies past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions not related to the proposed action that have the potential to cumulatively impact the resources in the affected environment for the proposed action and its regionally affected area. Geographic distribution, intensity, duration, and historical effects of similar activities are considered when determining whether a particular activity may contribute cumulatively and significantly to the impacts of Alternative 1 or Alternative 2 on the resources identified in the EIS. Based on discussions with the economic development leaders for Letcher County, development within the county has not been strong and there are very few past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions that when combined with the proposed action would result in cumulative impacts to the resources evaluated in this Revised Final EIS (DePriest 2016). An ongoing project in the area is the Gateway Regional Business Park. One future project identified includes a new regional airport. In addition to these projects, there are infrastructure and utility projects associated with the proposed action that have the potential to result in cumulative impacts. Gateway Regional Business Park The Gateway Regional Business Park is approximately 262 acres (106 hectares) located just north of Payne Gap. The site was developed about 10 years ago and initially included eight businesses; four businesses are currently operating on the site (DePriest 2016). The original master plan for the business park accommodated 24 lots (Appalachian Industrial Authority 2004). Construction and operation of the business park would have potential impacts to land use, topography and soils, socioeconomics, transportation and traffic, air quality, noise, infrastructure and utilities, and water resources. The Gateway Regional Business Park has the potential to be incompatible with surrounding land uses; however, Letcher County does not have any zoning ordinances that would regulate development and compatibility. Topography and soils would have been impacted as a result of construction activities. An increase in job opportunities in the area from operation of the businesses would likely have a positive impact on the local economy. Full development of the business park would likely increase traffic on U.S. Route 119 and may contribute to impacts to congestion on area roadways. It is anticipated that short-term temporary impacts to air quality and noise would have occurred as a result of construction activities. Infrastructure and utilities would have the potential to be impacted due to increased demands on potable water, wastewater treatment, natural gas, electricity, and solid waste. Additionally, the business park has the potential for water resources to be impacted by changes to drainage patterns, redirecting or increasing surface water runoff, and increases to erosion and sedimentation. Letcher County Airport Project In 2006, the Letcher County Airport Board applied to be included in the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems Program and be eligible to receive FAA funding for the Letcher County Airport project. The Kentucky Department of Aviation funded a site 8.0 Cumulative Impacts March 2016 8-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky selection study, and based on the study, a site near Isom in the northern part of Letcher County was identified for development of the airport (Summit Engineering 2008). The site is approximately 11.5 miles from Payne Gap and 8 miles from Roxana. The airport board recently executed a purchase option for 600 acres. Preparation of an EIS is planned to begin in late 2016 (DePriest 2016). Potential impacts resulting from the project could include land use, topography, geology, and soils, socioeconomics, transportation and traffic, air quality, noise, infrastructure and utilities, cultural resources, water resources, and biological resources. Siting of the airport may have impacts to land use compatibility with adjacent land uses. Excavation and grading activities to prepare the site for development may result in changes and impacts to topography, geology, and soils. Development of the airport has the potential to result in shortterm and long-term impacts to traffic as a result of construction vehicles accessing the site during construction and long-term impacts as a result of increased traffic to area roadways once the airport is operational. Both short- and long-term impacts to air quality could occur as the result of construction and operation activities of the airport. Short-term and long-term impacts due to increases in noise would likely result from construction activities and the operation of aircraft. It is anticipated that infrastructure and utilities would have increased demands placed on them during construction as well as operation of the airport. Other impacts that could result due to construction of the airport include cultural, water, and biological resources. Beneficial impacts to the economy of the region would be anticipated due to new jobs and potential tax base. Infrastructure and Utility Projects Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 would both require utility companies to upgrade facilities, extend cable, and construct new facilities to provide service to the proposed USP, FPC, and ancillary facilities. These projects would be dependent on the preferred alternative and conducted by the individual utility company. Letcher County has several future sewer extension projects planned, two in Jenkins and three in Whitesburg (Kentucky Infrastructure Authority 2015). These projects would provide service to residents with failing septic systems or to those using direct discharge to waterways via straight pipes. The City of Jenkins also has a future project for sewer line repairs and improvements to the WWTP that will reduce inflow and improve capacity of the plant. The future projects are designed to provide for expansion of the Gateway Regional Business Park. These projects are reasonably foreseeable in the future, but have not been funded. Letcher County has many residents using illegal straight pipes that have not yet been included in future sewer projects. These residential areas may ultimately be included in future wastewater infrastructure planning. Impacts associated with these projects have the potential to include land use, soils, air quality, noise, infrastructure and utilities, cultural resources, water resources, and biological resources. The projects have the potential to be incompatible with surrounding land use, disturb soils that could result in erosion and sedimentation issues, result in temporary increases to air emissions and temporary air quality impacts, result in temporary noise impacts due to construction activities, and impact cultural, biological, and water resources depending on the type and location of the upgrade or new construction and placement of cable. The projects would also result in a cumulative impact on the demand for wastewater treatment. Proposed Action Implementation of the proposed action would have potential impacts to land use, topography, geology, and soils, socioeconomics, transportation and traffic, air quality, noise, infrastructure and utilities, water resources, and biological resources. The proposed action would result in conversion of land uses. Letcher 8-2 8.0 Cumulative Impacts March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky County does not have any zoning ordinances that would regulate development and compatibility. Nonetheless, the buffer area to be maintained around the federal correctional facility would be compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed action would disturb and redistribute soils and rock, resulting in significant impacts on topography, geology, and soils within the project area of either Alternative 1 or 2. These impacts would be managed through the use of appropriate BMPs to prevent erosion and sedimentation. It is expected the proposed action would have a positive impact on the local economy in terms of employment and income. The proposed action would result in temporary traffic impacts during construction, and post-construction increases in traffic associated with the operation of the federal correctional facility at either alternative site. The proposed action would also contribute to short-term temporary increases to noise, and increase local air emissions, as well as have an overall contribution to greenhouse gases (GHGs). The proposed action would result in a significant impact to potable water capacity, wastewater treatment capacity, and natural gas infrastructure under Alternative 1. Under Alternative 2, the proposed action would have a significant impact to natural gas infrastructure. Implementation of the proposed action under either Alternative 1 or Alternative 2 would have adverse impacts on streams and wetlands. The proposed action would result in impacts to vegetation and to federally listed bat species and their habitat during construction of the federal correctional facility. As discussed in Sections 4.6 and 5.6, Air Quality, increases in air emissions for criteria pollutants that would occur at either site under the proposed action would have no direct or indirect significant impacts on local or regional air quality. As a result, this cumulative impacts analysis focuses on GHGs. Since individual sources of GHG emissions are not large enough to have an appreciable effect on climate change and the potential effects of proposed GHG emissions on climate change are global by nature, the study area for this aspect is not defined. GHGs are gases in the Earth’s atmosphere that prevent heat from escaping into space, resulting in climate change as the Earth’s surface temperature increases above past levels. GHGs result primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels, and include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). EO 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, requires federal agencies to inventory and report direct and indirect emissions of GHGs, including those associated with fuel consumption and the purchase of electricity. In addition, facilities with stationary combustion sources must determine applicability of the USEPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, as promulgated in 40 CFR Part 98, which requires reporting from facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons CO2 equivalent (CO2e) or more per year from stationary source fuel combustion. Emission sources evaluated in this Revised Final EIS are associated with construction and site operations. The primary GHG emission associated with these sources is CO2, and to a lesser extent, CH4 and N2O. Emissions of these GHGs are carried forward in the analysis. GHGs are produced from the burning of fossil fuels, as well as through industrial and biological processes. There are no published NEPA thresholds of significance for GHG emissions resulting from a proposed action and formulation of thresholds is difficult when attempting to identify what level of emissions would substantially contribute to global climate change. The cumulative effects for GHG emissions were evaluated for the proposed construction and subsequent operation activities. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix C, Air Emissions Calculations. Table 8-1 presents the GHG emissions associated with the proposed construction activities at the Payne Gap site. The estimated GHG emissions from the proposed construction activities at the Payne Gap site 8.0 Cumulative Impacts March 2016 8-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky are considerably less than the 25,000 metric ton per year reference point recommended for quantitative disclosure by the CEQ (CEQ 2014). In addition to GHGs that would be generated by the operation of equipment during construction, there is also the overall reduction in carbon sequestration capability that would be the result of the loss of 218 acres (88 hectares) of vegetation that would need to be cleared in order to develop the site. After the site is developed, a portion of it would be re-vegetated with trees, although the portion that can be re-vegetated would be a fraction of the total acreage. As a result, approximately 200 acres (81 hectares) of long-term carbon storage would be permanently lost, which is an estimated annual storage loss of 3,893 metric tons of CO2 using the method developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service to calculate carbon sequestration in a forest approximately 25 years old (Smith et al. 2006). Table 8-1. Estimated GHG Emissions from Construction Activities at Payne Gap Site Year 1 2 CO2e (metric tons per year) 10,913 10,913 Table 8-2 presents the GHG emissions associated with the proposed construction activities at the Roxana site. The estimated GHG emissions from the proposed construction activities at the Roxana site are considerably less than the 25,000 metric ton per year reference point for quantitative disclosure recommended by the CEQ (CEQ 2014). In addition to GHGs that would be generated by the operation of equipment during construction, there is also the overall reduction in carbon sequestration capability that would result from the loss of 161 acres (65 hectares) of vegetation that would be cleared during site development. After the site is developed, a portion of it would be re-vegetated with trees, although the portion that can be re-vegetated would be a fraction of the total acreage. As a result, approximately 150 acres (61 hectares) of long-term carbon storage would be permanently lost, which is an estimated annual storage loss of 2,919 metric tons of CO2 using the method developed by the USDA Forest Service to calculate carbon sequestration in a forest approximately 25 years old (Smith et al. 2006). Table 8-2. Estimated GHG Emissions from Construction Activities at Roxana Site Year 1 2 CO2e (metric tons per year) 4,006 4,006 The GHG emissions associated with the proposed operation of stationary sources (boilers and emergency generators) and staff commuter emissions once the facilities are operational would be approximately 1,271 metric tons per year. These emissions, which would occur throughout the life of the operating facility, are well below the 25,000 ton per year quantitative threshold recommended for analysis by the CEQ. Individual sources of anthropogenic GHG emissions are not large enough to have an appreciable effect on climate change. For this reason, emissions of GHGs from the proposed action alone would not cause appreciable global warming that would lead to climate change. These emissions would increase the atmosphere’s concentration of GHGs, and, in combination with past and future emissions from all other sources, contribute incrementally to the global warming that produces the adverse effects of climate 8-4 8.0 Cumulative Impacts March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky change. As such, a net small, adverse impact would result from the development and operation of the proposed action. Potential Cumulative Impacts 8.1.5.1 Land Use When past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects are analyzed together, there would be changes to land use from projects in Letcher County. The proposed action would likely contribute to permanent impacts to land use. However, Letcher County does not have any zoning ordinances regulating development and compatibility. Nonetheless, under the proposed action, land use compatibility issues with adjacent properties would be minimized through the siting of the facility and use of buffer areas to reduce potential incompatibility issues with surrounding residences and forested/undeveloped areas. Implementation of either Alternative 1 or 2 along with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would result in cumulative impacts to land use; however, the impacts would not be significant. 8.1.5.2 Topography, Geology, and Soils Excavation and grading activities associated with the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would impact topography, geology, and soils. Alternative 1 or Alternative 2 in conjunction with these other projects would result in significant impacts to topography, geology, and soils. However, erosion and sedimentation controls would be employed for all construction projects as required by federal and state regulations, and the impacts would be managed through the use of appropriate BMPs. When past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects are analyzed together with Alternative 1 or Alternative 2, there would be an overall positive impact to the socioeconomics of the region. Except for the infrastructure and utility projects, the cumulative projects would have short- and long-term beneficial economic impacts. It is assumed that short-term jobs would be created in the construction of facilities for the projects, and long-term jobs would be created for their operation. It is anticipated the projects would bring additional residents and workers who would likely spend money in the local area, resulting in beneficial cumulative impacts on the local and regional economy. The proposed action would be expected to result in a minor increase in population when considered in conjunction with the cumulative projects. 8.1.5.3 Traffic and Transportation Located in northern Letcher County, the proposed Letcher County Airport is unlikely to have the potential to interact with the proposed action under either Alternative 1 or Alternative 2 and would not cumulatively impact traffic in the vicinity of Payne Gap or Roxana. The infrastructure and utility projects are not likely to result in traffic increases. However, there would be potential cumulative traffic impacts from the Gateway Regional Business Park in conjunction with Alternative 1. Regular traffic would be expected on U.S. Route 119 during weekday business hours in association with operation of the businesses at the Gateway Regional Business Park. Under Alternative 1, potential impacts to traffic on U.S. Route 119 may occur during a.m. and p.m. peak periods. However, the potential impact to traffic would be reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of mitigation outlined in the Traffic Impact Study (Appendix F). Therefore, while Alternative 1 may contribute to cumulative impacts, mitigation measures would be in place and the cumulative impact would be considered less than significant. 8.0 Cumulative Impacts March 2016 8-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 8.1.5.4 Air Quality The past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in conjunction with the proposed action have the potential to contribute to changes in air quality. The majority of the impacts would be short-term construction impacts from the Gateway Regional Business Park and infrastructure and utility projects, which may occur during the same time period as the federal correctional facility construction. Neither the business park nor the infrastructure and utility projects would have long-term impacts to air quality. The Letcher County Airport project would likely have long-term operational emissions. The amount of emissions for any of the criteria pollutants is not known at this time, and would be dependent on the type and frequency of aircraft operations at the airport. The proposed action would not significantly impact local or regional air quality; therefore, in conjunction with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, the proposed action would not contribute to significant cumulative impacts to air quality. 8.1.5.5 Noise There is potential for construction of additional businesses at the Gateway Regional Business Park or certain infrastructure and utility projects to overlap with the construction of the proposed action. Therefore, there would be potential for cumulative noise impacts in the vicinity of either Payne Gap or Roxana from construction activities and construction vehicles traveling to/from project sites. Construction activities would be limited during certain days and hours during the week to minimize impacts. These cumulative impacts would be temporary and not significant. Operations of the federal correctional facility in conjunction with the cumulative projects would generate some level of noise, but any increase in ambient noise levels would not be significant. Increases in noise levels would be anticipated from aircraft operations at the Letcher County Airport; however, these impacts would be considered infrequent. Implementation of the proposed action along with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would not result in significant cumulative noise impacts. 8.1.5.6 Infrastructure and Utilities The proposed action would contribute to cumulative impacts on infrastructure and utility demand. Cumulative wastewater treatment demand under Alternative 1 would considerably exceed the capacity of the Jenkins WWTP; therefore, cumulative impacts to wastewater treatment capacity would be significant under Alternative 1. The demand for treatment of wastewater under Alternative 2 would increase the Whitesburg WWTP to approximately 87 percent of its current design capacity; therefore, Alternative 2 combined with reasonably foreseeable future projects would potentially exceed the capacity of the plant and be a significant impact. However, most of the future projects in the Whitesburg service area currently do not have funding and have not been programmed for construction. The effort to include the existing pending projects and any potential future projects requires extensive planning and would need to be approved through the facilities planning and approval process (Nesbitt 2015). The region prepares a facilities plan approximately every 10 years. The city of Whitesburg is currently in the initial phase of this 10-year planning process (Nesbitt 2015). Furthermore, the Kentucky River Area Development District 2012–2013 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Update included planning for infrastructure for a new federal prison. Currently, there is ample capacity to handle the flow from Alternative 2, as wastewater flow from the proposed prison was incorporated into the design of the plant. The existing plant was designed to accommodate 8-6 8.0 Cumulative Impacts March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky expansion in the future. The WWTP site was selected for its ample space for expansion. Plans for this expansion and an approach to the connection of the illegal straight pipes and any other approved extensions will be incorporated in the next regional facilities plan (Nesbitt 2015). The timing of the future sewer projects and future planning for expansion of the Whitesburg WWTP would minimize the cumulative impacts of Alternative 2. 8.1.5.7 Water Resources Implementation of the proposed action along with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would disturb soils and would result in temporary increases in soil disturbance and potential soil erosion and a permanent increase in impervious surfaces in the area, with a consequential increase in stormwater runoff. Implementation of BMPs as parts of an erosion and sediment control plan and groundwater protection plan for construction of the proposed action would minimize these impacts. Under Kentucky regulations, the Letcher County Airport, and likely also the Gateway Regional Business Park, would require a groundwater protection plan. This assessment assumes these projects would implement BMPs to limit erosion and runoff. Therefore, cumulative impacts to local water resources would not be significant. The proposed action would adversely affect an estimated 10,512 linear feet of streams and 2.4 acres (0.97 hectares) of wetlands under Alternative 1, and approximately 4,117 linear feet of streams and 2.45 acres (1.0 hectares) of wetlands under Alternative 2. As part of its Section 404 permit from the USACE, the Bureau would pay into an in-lieu fee fund to mitigate the impacts under the preferred alternative (Alternative 2). The mitigation would reduce the direct impacts to less than significant. Direct impacts to wetlands and streams by the other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future construction projects are unknown. Given the size of the projects, particularly the Letcher County Airport, impacts to wetlands or streams would be expected. Compliance with federal regulations for wetlands and stream impacts would require full mitigation of impacts. As a result, cumulative impacts would not be significant. 8.1.5.8 Biological Resources The proposed action would involve ground disturbing activities and tree clearing for construction of new facilities. Direct impacts to forested land would comprise an estimated 218 acres (88 hectares) under Alternative 1, and an estimated 118 acres (48 hectares) under Alternative 2. When considered cumulatively, it is anticipated that the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the area would result in the development of several hundred acres of land in Letcher County. Much of this land is forested. The cumulative loss of several hundred acres of forest would constitute a loss of a small fraction of forested land within the 338 square mile land area of Letcher County, and is not considered to be significant. Construction-related noise has the potential to temporarily disturb wildlife in the immediate vicinity of the project areas. Permanent impacts to wildlife would result from the cumulative loss of habitat from construction of the proposed action and cumulative projects in the area. Wildlife species would be permanently displaced by the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, however, suitable habitat would be available on adjacent land areas. Under the proposed action, more than two-thirds of the project site under either Alternative 1 or Alternative 2 would remain undisturbed and continue to provide habitat for wildlife species found on-site. Therefore, cumulative impacts to wildlife would not be significant. 8.0 Cumulative Impacts March 2016 8-7 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky The proposed action has the potential to impact summer roosting habitat and winter hibernaculum of the Indiana bat and northern long-eared bat under Alternative 1, and the summer roosting habitat of both bats under Alternative 2. Under Alternative 2, the preferred alternative, the Bureau would mitigate the direct impacts to the Indiana bat and northern long-eared bat by paying into the Imperiled Bat Conservation Fund. Conservation measures would also be implemented to minimize potential indirect impacts to these bat species from site lighting. Cumulative impacts to both bat species and their habitat could result from construction and operation of the Letcher County Airport; however, specific impacts are not known at this time. If mitigation and conservation measures are implemented for the Letcher County Airport project, it is anticipated that the cumulative impacts to Indiana bat and northern long-eared bat would not be considered significant. 8-8 8.0 Cumulative Impacts March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 9.0 REFERENCES Appalachian Industrial Authority. 2004. Gateway Business Park Site Plan. Appalachian Regional Healthcare (ARH). 2014. Analysis of Whitesburg ARH Hospital Services. April 15. Cardno. 2014a. Enhanced Utilities Report Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. October. Cardno. 2014b. Historic Architectural Resources Survey for a Proposed Federal Correctional Facility, Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. February. Cardno. 2014c. Draft Supplemental Jurisdictional Delineation Payne Gap and Roxana Sites. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. August. Cardno. 2016a. Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. January. Cardno. 2016b. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana, Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. February. Copperhead Environmental Consulting. 2015. Desktop Analysis and Habitat Survey for the Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis), Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens), and Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) at two Sites for a Proposed Federal Correctional Facility in Letcher County, KY. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. January. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 1997. Environmental Justice, Guidance Under the National Environmental Policy Act. December 10. CEQ. 2014. Revised Draft Guidance on the Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews. December. DePriest, Joe. 2013. Economic Development Director, Letcher County. Personal communication. DePriest, Joe. 2016. Economic Development Director, Letcher County. Personal communication, March 9. Division of Planning. 2011. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet: Traffic Station Counts, Letcher County. February. Environmental Data Resources (EDR). 2015. The EDR Radius Map™ Report With Geocheck. June 16, 2015. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Bureau). 2009. Categorical Exclusion: Proposed Electrified Fence Project, United States Penitentiary - Martin County, Kentucky. July 21. 9.0 References March 2016 9-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2008. Flood Insurance Rate Map Letcher County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas. Map number 21133C0140C. March 18. Federal Highway Administration. 2006. Highway Traffic Noise: Construction Noise Handbook, Chapter 9. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/handbook/handbook09.cfm. Last updated July 5, 2011, accessed March 7, 2013. Fleming Neon Fire Department. 2013. Scott Collins, Captain. Personal communication, September 4. Fleming Neon Police Department. 2013. Mike Dingus, Chief of Police. Personal communication, September 4. Hall, L.S., P.R. Krausman, and M.L. Morrison. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:173–182. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). 2012. Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. Washington, DC. Jenkins Police Department. 2013. Todd DePriest, Public Safety Director for the City of Jenkins. Personal communication, September 4. Jenkins Volunteer Fire Station. 2013. Todd DePriest, Public Safety Director for the City of Jenkins. Personal communication, September 4. Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection (KDEP). 1994. Division of Water: Groundwater Branch. Groundwater Sensitivity Regions of Kentucky. Retrieved from http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsweb/download/wrs/sensitivity.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2013. KDEP. 2009. Instruction Booklet for DEP 7097C [Closure Report for Petroleum Releases and Exempt Petroleum Tank Systems]. Division of Waste Management, Superfund Branch – Petroleum Cleanup Section, Frankfort, Kentucky. October. KDEP. 2013. Division of Water, Total Maximum Daily Load Program. http://water.ky.gov/waterquality/Pages/303dList.aspx. Accessed July 17, 2013. KDEP. 2015. Division of Water Public Notification. KDEP Energy and Environment Cabinet, Drinking Water Compliance Section, Frankfort, Kentucky. Accessed at http://water.ky.gov/DrinkingWater/Pages/PublicNotification.aspx. Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources. 2013. Species Information; Species Observations for Letcher County. http://fw.ky.gov/kfwis/speciesInfo/countyList.asp?strGroup=3. Accessed July 22, 2013. Kentucky Geological Survey (KGS). 2013. Kentucky Geologic Map Information Service. University of Kentucky, Lexington. http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsmap/kgsgeoserver/viewer.asp. Accessed July 17, 2013. KGS. 2015. Kentucky Energy Infrastructure. Kentucky Department for Energy Development and Independence and Kentucky Geological Survey. http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsmap/KYCoal/viewer.asp. Accessed December 18, 2015. 9-2 9.0 References March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Kentucky Heritage Council (KHC). 2011. Letter from Linda Casebier, Acting Executive Director and State Historic Preservation Officer, to Bridgette Lyles, Site Selection Specialist, Bureau of Prisons, regarding the Architectural Resource Reconnaissance Survey, Letcher County, Kentucky. September 13. KHC. 2014. Letter from Craig A. Potts, Executive Director and State Historic Preservation Officer, to Issac Gaston, Capacity Planning and Site Selection Branch, Bureau of Prisons, regarding the Historic Architectural Resources Survey, for Proposed Federal Correctional Facility, Letcher County, Kentucky. April 24. Kentucky Infrastructure Authority. 2015. Kentucky Wastewater Mapping, Project Profiles. http://kygeonet.ky.gov/kia/cw/index.html. Accessed October 20, 2015. Kentucky Labor Market Information (KYLMI). 2014. Labor Force, Employment and Unemployment for Letcher County, Kentucky in Multiple Time Periods. https://kylmi.ky.gov/vosnet/analyzer/results.aspx?session=labforce. Accessed November 5. Kentucky Mine Mapping Information System. 2008. http://minemaps.ky.gov/. Last updated September 18, 2008. Accessed December 18, 2015. Kentucky River Area Development District (KRADD). 2013. Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Update, FY 2012–2013, Mapping the Progress of the Kentucky River Area Economy. Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission. 2014. County Report of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Plants, Animals, and Natural Communities of Kentucky. Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. August. Kentucky State Police. 2013. Claude Little, Investigative Lieutenant. Personal communication, September 4. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC). 2014a. Functional Classification. http://transportation.ky.gov/Planning/Pages/Functional-Classification.aspx. Accessed September 30. KYTC. 2014b. Traffic Station Counts. http://transportation.ky.gov/planning/pages/count-maps.aspx. Accessed September 30. KYTC. 2014c. Truck Weight Limits on State-Maintained Routes. http://apps.transportation.ky.gov/HIS_Reports/TruckWeightLimitsParam.aspx. Accessed November 6. KYTC. 2015. Kentucky Truck Weight Classification. http://transportation.ky.gov/Planning/Documents/Weight%20Class.pdf. Kings Creek Volunteer Fire Department. 2015. Robert Meade, Fire Chief. Personal communication, March 12. Laurel Ridge Landfill. 2014. Bruce Crouch, Manager. Personal communication, March 6. Letcher County Fire and Rescue. 2013. John Amburgey, EMS Lieutenant. Personal communication, September 7. 9.0 References March 2016 9-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Letcher County Sheriff. 2013. Eugene Slone, Victims Advocate for Letcher County. Personal communication, September 4. Letcher County Water and Sewer District (LCWSD). 2014. Water Quality Report for year 2014. KY0670462. Lewis, Mark. 2015. Letcher County Water and Sewer District, General Manager. Personal communication, October 7 and 14. Midwest Research Institute. 2005. Analysis of the Fine Fraction of Particulate Matter in Fugitive Dust. October 12. Mountain Comprehensive Health Corporation. 2015. Services and locations. http://www.mountaincomprehensivehealth.com/about.html. Accessed August 17, 2015. Mullins, Paul. 2015. Director of Land Management, Enterprise Mining. Personal communication, September 25. National Technology Transfer Center at Wheeling Jesuit University. 2009. Coal Impoundment Location and Information System. http://coalimpoundment.nttc.edu/locate/list.asp. Accessed September 2, 2015. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2013. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed July 19, 2013. Natureserve. 2013a. Explorer: Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens), Ecology and Life History. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?searchName=Myotis+grisescens. Accessed July 19, 2013. Natureserve. 2013b. Explorer: Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis), Ecology and Life History. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?searchName=Myotis+sodalis. Accessed July 19, 2013. Nesbitt, Paul. 2015. Whitesburg City Engineer, Personal communication, October 2. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2013. General Industry Digest. OSHA 220105R 2013. Parsons. 2015. Federal Correctional Facility Environmental Impact Statement, Draft Traffic Impact Study. April. Proximity One. 2014. Demographic Trends 2010–2060. http://proximityone.com. Accessed October 13. Sierra Club. 2015. Coal Ash Waste-Beyond Coal. http://content.sierraclub.org/coal/disposal-ash-waste. Accessed June 15, 2015. Smith, James E., Linda S. Heath, Kenneth E. Skog, Richard A. Birdsey. 2006. Methods for Calculating Forest Ecosystem and Harvested Carbon with Standard Estimates for Forest Types of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA. April. Sparkman, Dena. 2014. CEO Whitesburg ARH Hospital. Personal communication. 9-4 9.0 References March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Summit Engineering. 2008. Preliminary Engineering Report: Roxana Prison Site. Prepared for the Letcher County Planning Commission. Prepared by Summit Engineering, Lexington, Kentucky. TEC, Inc. 2011a. Architectural Resource Reconnaissance Survey, Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for the Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. August. TEC, Inc. 2011b. Draft Wetland Identification and Delineation Report, Payne Gap/Lawson Site, Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. August. TEC, Inc. 2011c. Draft Wetland Identification and Delineation Report, Roxana/Meade Farm, Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. August. TEC, Inc. 2012. Feasibility Study for Proposed Correctional Facility, Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC. June. Transportation Research Board. 2010. Highway Capacity Manual. Fifth Edition. Washington, DC. University of Kentucky. 2013. Kentucky Maps. http://www.uky.edu/KGS/gis/krgweb/. Accessed July 18, 2013. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y-87-1 (online edition). U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Table DP-1, Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000. Summary File 1. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?fpt=table. Accessed November 10, 2014. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Table DP-1, Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 2010. Demographic Profile Data. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF. Accessed November 10, 2014. U.S. Census Bureau. 2014a. 2011–2013 American Community Survey 3-Year Estimates, Table DP03, Selected Economic Characteristics. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?fpt=table. Accessed November 11, 2014. U.S. Census Bureau. 2014b. 2011–2013 American Community Survey 3-Year Estimates, Table DP04, Selected Housing Characteristics. http://factfinder2.census.gov/rest/dnldController/deliver?_ts=433256505856. Accessed November 5, 2014. U.S. Census Bureau. 2014c. 2011–2013 American Community Survey 3-Year Estimates, Table DP05, Demographic and Housing Estimates. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?fpt=table. Accessed November 6, 2014. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2014. Bureau of Economic Analysis. BEARFACTS Letcher County, Kentucky. http://www.bea.gov/REGIONAL/bearfacts/action.cfm?fips=21133&areatype=21133. Accessed November 6, 2014. 9.0 References March 2016 9-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1971. Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment and Home Appliances. USEPA. 1982. Guidelines for Noise Impact Analysis. April. USEPA. 2011. National Ambient Air Quality Standards. http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html. USEPA. 2013a. My Waters Mapper. http://watersgeo.epa.gov/mwm/. Accessed July 16, 2013. USEPA. 2013b. Region 4: Ground Water Protection, Sole Source Aquifers in the Southeast. http://www.epa.gov/region4/water/groundwater/r4ssa.html. Accessed July 18, 2013. USEPA. 2015a. Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) –Surface Impoundments with High Hazard Potential Ratings. http://www.epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/industrial/special/fossil/ccrs-fs/. Accessed June 15. USEPA. 2015b. Coal Combustion Residuals Impoundment Assessment Reports. http://www.epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/industrial/special/fossil/surveys2/index.htm. Accessed June 15. USEPA. 2015c. Radon. http://www.epa.gov/radon/. Accessed June 1, 2015. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2010. Species Assessment and Listing Priority Assignment Form. March. USFWS. 2013. Critical Habitat Mapper. http://criticalhabitat.fws.gov/crithab/flex/crithabMapper.jsp?. Accessed July 19, 2013. USFWS. 2014. FWS 2013-B-0627; Federal Bureau of Prisons; proposed federal penitentiary; located in Letcher County, Kentucky. Kentucky Ecological Services Field Office, Frankfort, KY. August 7. USFWS. 2015a. IPaC [Information for Planning and Conservation] Trust Resource Report. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Accessed December 21, 2015. USFWS. 2015b. Factsheet, Northern Long-Eared Bat, Myotis septentrionalis. http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/nlebFactSheet.html. June 18. USFWS. 2015c. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status for Kentucky Arrow Darter with 4(d) Rule; Proposed Rule. Federal Register 80:60962–60988. USFWS. 2015d. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status for the Northern Long-Eared Bat with 4(d) Rule. Federal Register 80: 17974–18033. Wagoner, Lisa. 2014. Letcher County Schools. Personal communication. Western Governors’ Association. 2006. WRAP Fugitive Dust Handbook. Prepared for Western Governors’ Association, Denver, CO, by Countess Environmental, Westlake Village, CA. September 7. Whitesburg Fire and Rescue. 2013. Benny Bentley, Volunteer Firefighter. Personal communication, September 4. Whitesburg Police Department. 2013. Garnet Sexton, City Clerk and Treasurer for Whitesburg. Personal communication, September 4. 9-6 9.0 References March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 10.0 LIST OF PREPARERS Federal Bureau of Prisons Thomas Webber, Branch Chief, Capacity Planning and Construction Issac Gaston, Site Selection Specialist Cardno Cristina Ailes – Public Involvement Specialist B.S. Environmental Science B.A. International Studies Years of Experience: 7 Scott Barker – Transportation and Traffic M.S. Civil Engineering/City Planning Years of Experience: 24 Erika Fuery – Hazardous Materials and Waste M.S. Environmental Science Years of Experience: 15 Kathy Hall – Quality Control B.A Earth and Environmental Sciences Years of Experience: 18 Lesley Hamilton – Air Quality B.A. Chemistry Years of Experience: 27 Deborah Henson – Project Manager M.S. Geo-environmental Studies Years of Experience: 17 Joanne Lortie – Socioeconomics M.A. Economics Years of Experience: 24 Kathleen Riek – Project Director B.S. Biology Years of Experience: 21 10.0 List of Preparers March 2016 Kimberly Sebestyen – Archaeological Resources M.A. American Studies Years of Experience: 21 Abby Shoff – GIS Specialist, Graphics B.S. Geographical Information Systems Years of Experience: 2 Lori Thursby – Architectural Resources M. Architectural History Years of Experience: 17 Jill Yamaner – Infrastructure and Utilities M.S. Environmental Engineering Years of Experience: 22 Dale Nicholson – Grading and Excavation Modeling B.S. Civil Engineering Years of Experience: 35 John Feddock – Quality Control Grading and Excavation Modeling M.S. Mining Engineering Years of Experience: Sam Moore – Roadway Design and Site Grading Years of Experience: 35 Dave McChesney – Cut and Fill Modeling B.S. Mining Engineering Years of Experience: 31 10-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) 10-2 10.0 List of Preparers March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 11.0 DISTRIBUTION LIST Federal Elected Officials Senator Mitch McConnell 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Representative Harold Rogers 2406 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Senator Rand Paul 124 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 State Elected Officials Governor Matt Bevin 700 Capitol Avenue, Suite 100 Frankfort, KY 40601 Representative Leslie Combs 245 E. Cedar Drive Pikeville, KY 41501 Senator Johnny Ray Turner 849 Crestwood Drive Prestonsburg, KY 41653 Representative John Short 240 Briarwood Lane Mallie, KY 41836 Local Elected Officials Mayor James Craft 38 East Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 James Bates 38 East Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Mayor Todd DePriest P.O. Box 568 Jenkins, KY 41537 Robin Bowen-Watko 27 Della Drive Whitesburg, KY 41858 Keith Adams P.O. Box 5 Jeremiah, KY 41826 Larry Everidge 38 East Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Terry Adams P.O. Box 488 Isom, KY 41824 Jamie Hatton, County Attorney 95 A Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Honorable Edison G. Banks, II 48 East Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Bobby Howard 247 Tunnel Road Whitesburg, KY 41858 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 11-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Don McCall 156 Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Jim Ward, Letcher County Judge Executive 156 Main Street, Suite 107 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Honorable Kevin R. Mullins 156 Main Street, Suite 101C Whitesburg, KY 41858 Danny Webb, Sheriff 6 Broadway Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Tom Sexton 38 East Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 John Williams 146 Maryland Drive Whitesburg, KY 41858 Sheila Short 181 Shady Drive Whitesburg, KY 41858 Honorable Samuel T. Wright, III 156 Main Street, Suite 205 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Federal Agencies U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – EIS Filing Section Heinz Mueller U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, GA 30303 Lee Andrews U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Kentucky Field Office 330 W Broadway, Suite 265 Frankfort, KY 40601 David Baldridge U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Louisville District 845 Sassafras Creek Road Sassafras, KY 41759 State Agencies State Clearinghouse Ronald T. Price Executive Staff Advisor Office of the Commissioner Department for Environmental Protection 300 Fair Oaks Lane Frankfort, KY 40604 Local Agencies Letcher County Economic Development Joe DePriest Box 186 Jenkins, KY 41437 11-2 Letcher County Planning Commission Box 370 Whitesburg, KY 41858 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Letcher County Emergency Management 156 Main Street, Suite 107 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Individuals and Organizations Barbara Adams 69 Adams Ln Redfox, KY 41847 Bobby Adams 1797 Highway 343 McRoberts, KY 41835 D Adams 126 Walter Br Rd Isom, KY 41824 Danielle Adams P.O Box 568 Jenkins, KY 41537 Danny Adams P.O. Box 843 Jenkins, KY 41537 Doug Adams 24 Baker Dr Whitesburg, KY 41858 Frank Adams 309 Seco Dr. Seco, KY 41849 Hettie Adams Address Withheld Larry Adams P.O. Box 111 Isom, KY 41824 Larry Adams P.O. Box 1054 Hazard, KY 41702 Paul Adams 63 Arizona Avenue Whitesburg, KY 41858 Trish Adams 412 Roy Campbell Drive, Suite 100 Hazard, KY 41701 Wade Adams 1168 Rainbow Valley Whitesburg, KY 41858 Stephen Amber P.O. Box 436 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Emily Anderson 159 Corkwood Ln Mayking, KY 41838 Craig Baily P.O. Box 67 Isom, KY 41824 Kevin and Courtney Baker 3197 Highway 803 Millstone, KY 41838 Marty Baker Address Withheld Shad Baker P.O. Box 204 Jenkins, KY 41537 Ruth Bamberger 596 River’s Breeze Dr Ludlow, KY 41016 Bob Banks 4625 Highway 7 South Letcher, KY 41832 Connie Bates 3267 Highway 15 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Danny and Dionne Bates 44 Steelbridge Rd Blackey, KY 41804 Davis Banks 234 Boney Banks Cemetery Rd Whitesburg, KY 41858 Wendy Bates 126 Big Shelby Creek Jenkins, KY 41537 Sally Barto 100 Tennessee Avenue Whitesburg, KY 41858 Duane Beachey 2670 Highway 1148 Isom, KY 41824 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 11-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Dan Berger Address Withheld Scottie Billiter P.O. Box 815 Jenkins, KY 41537 Black Lives Matter Kentucky 3208 W. Broadway Louisville, KY 40211 Benjamin Blair 53 Log Cabin Dr. Mayking, KY 41837 Randy Blair 347 Chissom Rd Jeremiah, KY 41826 Black Lives Matter (Lexington Group) 2369 Aristocracy Circle Lexington, KY 40509 Teresa Blair P.O. Box 587 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Daryl Boggs P.O. Box 806 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Melinda Boggs 334 Highway 3404 Partridge, KY 40862 Zachary Boggs P.O. Box 974 Pound, VA 24279 Anita Bolt 451 Murphy Street NW Norton, VA 24273 Thomas Bornes 98 B & O Hill Jenkins, KY 41537 Chad Bowling 671 Old Long Fork Road Virgie, KY 41572 Tony Bowling 41 Commercial Dr Hazard, KY 41701 Bette Braddock 304 Indian Creek Road Whitesburg, KY 41858 Jeffery Breeding P.O. Box 442 Neon, KY 41840 Shirley Breeding Address Withheld Tim Breeding P.O. Box 86 Isom, KY 41824 Kinnita Brock 1150 Pert Creek Rd Whitesburg, KY 41858 Henry Brooks P.O. Box 279 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Aaron Brown 101 Tolliver Rd Whitesburg, KY 41858 Charlotte Brown 960 Little Dry Fork Whitesburg, KY 41858 Nancy Brown 18 Tyler Lane Whitesburg, KY 41858 Dana Beasley Brown Kentuckians For The Commonwealth 250 Plaza Dr., Suite 4 Lexington, KY 40503 Regina Brown 4380 Highway 7 South Blackey, KY 41804 Roland Brown 1141 Doty Creek Jeremiah, KY 41826 Tracy Brown 16 Tyler Lane Whitesburg, KY 41858 Ron Brunty 149 Hiram Bailey Loop Letcher, KY 41832 Dwight Buckley Address Withheld Lori Ann Burd Center for Biological Diversity Address Withheld Jack Burkich 79 Mountain View Ave Whitesburg, KY 41858 Theresa Callihan 9886 Highway 931 South Whitesburg, KY 41858 Nancy Campbell 40 Windmill Acres Blackey, KY 41804 11-4 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky William Campbell 31 North Adams Ridge Hazard, KY 41701 Stephanie Cassell Address Withheld Holly Caudill 1119 Highway 1148 Isom, KY 41824 Jill Caudill P.O. Box 560 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Mike and Joy Caudill P.O. Box 831 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Reed Caudill Address Withheld Sally Caudill 25 Mountain View Ave Whitesburg, KY 41858 Sandy Caudill P.O. Box 234 Ermine, KY 41818 William Caudill 1936 Carcassonne Rd Blackey, KY 41804 David Clark P.O. Box 902 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Sarah Clark P.O. Box 319 101 Chestnut St Berea, KY 40404 Harry Collins 562 Smoot Creek Whitesburg, KY 41858 Victoria Collins Address Withheld Johnny Combs 8141 Highway 15 Isom, KY 41824 Debbie Cook P.O. Box 1052 Thornton, KY 41855 Rebecca Cook Address Withheld Sandra Cook P.O. Box 336 Mayking, KY 41837 Sandra Cook Virginia Organizing 703 Concord Ave Charlottesville, VA 22903 Elwood Cornett 262 Elwood Rd Blackey, KY 41804 Heather Corbett P.O. Box 626 Jenkins, KY 41537 Terry Cornett 15844 Highway 160 Linefork, KY 41833 Amy Craft P.O. Box 8 Mayking, KY 41837 Anna Craft Address Withheld Roland Craft P.O. Box 568 Jenkins, KY 41537 Amy Crawford P.O. Box 333 Mayking, KY 41837 Sandi Curd P.O. Box 1738 London, KY 40741 Jean Curry 37 Arlington Circle Jenkins, KY 41537 Rick Damron 60 Camden Rd Jenkins, KY 41537 Lisa Daniels 131 Summit Dr Pikeville, KY 41501 Carol Day P.O. Box 1106 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Dauphus Day 52 Boggs Hollow Whitesburg, KY 41858 Joe DePriest P.O. Box 186 Jenkins, KY 41530 Todd DePriest P.O. Box 2 Jenkins, KY 41537 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 11-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Michael Dingus P.O. Box 1224 Jenkins, KY 41537 Daniel Dixon 192 Turkey Creek Road Hallie, KY 41821 Jennifer Dixon 168 Emory Ln Blackey, KY 41804 Harlin Eldridge 215 Scarlett Lane Neon, KY 41840 Hazel Eldridge 172 Breezie Ridge Hallie, KY 41821 Kim Ellis Larry Everidge P.O. Box 844 Whitesburg, KY 41858 James Fields 966 Tolly Br Hallie, KY 41821 Dr. Preston Elrod Nell Fields 12225 Highway 160 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Brian Fieldsong 2641 Highway 588 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Bea Fleming P.O. Box 432 Pound, VA 24279 Brad and Teresa Fleming P.O. Box 1432 Pound, VA 24279 Dennis Fleming P.O. Box 280 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Nancy Fleming P.O. Box 88 Jenkins, KY 41539 Paul Fleming P.O. Box 88 Jenkins, KY 41537 Charles Frazier 60 Chandler Dr. Hallie, KY 41821 Doris Jean Frazier Address Withheld Alfred Fysste P.O. Box 428 Isom, KY 41840 Chris Gang 557 Burlew Dr Charleston, WV 25302 Chris Gang Codell Gibson 533 Coperhead Lane Ermine, KY 41815 Deborah Gibson 337 Highway 3401 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Emily Gillespie 373 Henry St Appalachia, VA 24216 Alana Godner-Abravanel Hampshire College 893 West St Amherst, MA 01002 Peggy Green P.O. Box 263 Jenkins, KY 41537 Michelle Griffin P.O. Box 304 Mayking, KY 41837 David Halcomb 322 Sackett Loop Whitesburg, KY 41850 Glenna Halcomb 200 Noras Road Cornettsville, KY 41731 Brad Hall 3249 N Mayo Trail Pikeville, KY 41501 Dixie Hall Address Withheld Eric Hall 190 Misty Branch Neon, KY 41840 William and Jennifer Hall 251-C Medical Plaza Whitesburg, KY 41858 11-6 Radical Action for Mountain Peoples’ Survival P.O. Box 121 Rock Creek, WV 25174 Eastern Kentucky University 521 Lancaster Ave, Stratton 467 Richmond, KY 40475 Stories from South Central WV Address Withheld 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky April Hall-Ilone P.O. Box 488 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Margaret Hammonds 122 Dow Collins Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Margaret Hammonds Whitaker Bank, Inc. 187 Main St Whitesburg, KY 41858 Phillip Hampton P.O. Box 2314 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Robert Hares Address Withheld Jill Harmer Address Withheld Crystal Hart P.O. Box 44 Mayking, KY 41837 Jill Hatel P.O. Box 412 Isom, KY 41824 Douglas and Alice Hayes 20 Bayview Dr. Jenkins, KY 41537 Gabrielle Helle 150 Rainbow Dr Whitesburg, KY 41858 Jon Henrikson 3128 Highway 3408 Blackey, KY 41804 Jarrad Hipps 24 Frazier Ave Whitesburg, KY 41858 Connie Hogg 8371 Highway 160 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Sandy Hogg Address Withheld Angie Holbrook P.O. Box 223 Eolia, KY 40826 Sheila Holbrook P.O. Box 293 Neon, KY 41840 Robert Holcomb 9538 Highway 15 Isom, KY 41824 Caleb Howard 15 Frazier Ave Whitesburg, KY 41858 Henry Hughes 700 College Road Cumberland, KY 40823 Danny and Nancy Ingram 11638 Highway 160 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Carol Ison Cowan Community Center 81 Sturgill Branch Whitesburg, KY 41858 James Ison P.O. Box 149 Isom, KY 41824 Kendall and Carol Ison 5431 Highway 931 South Whitesburg, KY 41858 Patricia Ison 271 Stallard Road Whitesburg, KY 41858 Sherwood and Rhoda Ison 9769 Highway 522 Totz, KY 40870 Eliza Jane P.O. Box 265 Jenkins, KY 41537 Brian Johnson P.O. Box 1201 Jenkins, KY 41537 James Johnson 953 Sorgon Road Whitesburg, KY 41815 Tonya Johnson 340 Tyler Ln Whitesburg, KY 41858 Elizabeth Jones 252 Fairview Ln Neon, KY 41840 Janet Keating Ellis Keyes 240 Hospital Road Whitesburg, KY 41858 James Kincaid P.O. Box 105 Roxana, KY 41804 Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition P.O. Box 6753 Huntington, WV 25773 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 11-7 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Brenda Kincer 243 Heritage Drive Whitesburg, KY 41858 G. Kincer P.O. Box 1202 Jenkins, KY 41537 Robin and Dwayne Kincer P.O. Box 183 Jenkins, KY 41537 Sandra Kincer P.O. Box 202 Jenkins, KY 41537 Larry King Address Withheld Amelia Kirby 1356 Jenkins Rd Whitesburg, KY 41858 R.F. and Edna Kiser 559 Bill Moore Br. Whitesburg, KY 41858 Melissa Knight 82 Improvement Branch Jenkins, KY 41537 Jeanette Ladd P.O. Box 261 Cromona, KY 41810 Margaret Lewis Address Withheld Shawn Lind 4091 Highway 805 Jenkins, KY 41537 John Lindon 210 Apple Ridge Lane Hazard, KY 41701 Dewey Little P.O. Box 43 Pine Top, KY 41731 Shane Lyle 801 Corporate Dr Lexington, KY 40503 Bridgette Madden 1108 Racetrack Holw Whitesburg, KY 41858 Royce Maggard Jr. Address Withheld Roger Martin 2743 Highway 7 South Dena, KY 41859 Ricky Mason 588 Stinking Branch Thornton, KY 41855 Josh May P.O. Box 18 Mayking, KY 41837 Jordan Mazurek 3401 Gatewood Ct, Apt 56 Lexington, KY 40517 Jim and Karen McAuley 87 Kona Dr Whitesburg, KY 41858 Bennie McCall P.O. Box 646 Neon, KY 41840 Bill McClanahan Address Withheld Dustin McDaniel Abolitionist Law Center P.O. Box 8654 Pittsburgh, PA 15221 James McDannel 116 Vermillion Ave Whitesburg, KY 41858 Roger and Geraldine McDonald 170 Virginia Ave Whitesburg, KY 41858 Eddie Meade 2 Stevens Fork Deane, KY 41812 Eugene Meade 19 Fields Cliff Whitesburg, KY 41858 Robert Meade 11010 Highway 160 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Shelia Meade P.O. Box 316 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Twyla Messer 219 Yellow Mt. Rd Leburn, KY 41831 Delena Miller 9145 Highway 931 S. Whitesburg, KY 41858 Mary Miller Address Withheld 11-8 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Belinda Morris 493 Highway 3404 Partridge, KY 40862 Annette Napier 917 Perry Park Road Hazard, KY 41701 Durward and Deborah Narramore 71 Elm St Jenkins, KY 41537 Lisa Narramore 26 Pine St Whitesburg, KY 41858 Paul Nesbitt 227 North Upper St Lexington, KY 40507 Freddy Oakes P.O. Box 1102 Thornton, KY 41855 Stanley Osborne 3374 Highway 317 Jackhorn, KY 41825 Leslie and Paul Parsons 1771 Highway 931 North Whitesburg, KY 41858 Ike Patterson 166 Long Ave Whitesburg, KY 41858 James and Rhonda Perry P.O. Box 197 Lynch, KY 40855 Anne Petermann Global Justice Ecology Project Address Withheld Rodney Pigman 71 Darcas Branch Whitesburg, KY 41858 Pine Mountain Grill Address Withheld Susan Polis 843 Highway 317 Isom, KY 41840 Lona Leigh Pomraning 134 Ohio St Whitesburg, KY 41858 Emily Posner Address Withheld Gary and Rita Pratt 187 Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Prison Books Collective Address Withheld Maxine Quillen 77 Sydney Dr Whitesburg, KY 41858 Stephen Raher 1120 N.W. Couch Street 10th Floor Portland, OR 97209-4128 Tarence Ray 260 Main Street, Apt B Whitesburg, KY 41858 JoAnn Redmond P.O. Box 311 Mayking, KY 41837 Cathy Rose 2792 Highway 3406 Jenkins, KY 41537 Elizabeth Sanders 1348 Jenkins Road Whitesburg, KY 41858 Janet Sandlin P.O. Box 834 Hazard, KY 41702 Charles Saxton 412 Solomon Road Whitesburg, KY 41858 Ann Sayer 50 Twin Creek Drive Eolia, KY 40826 Judah Schept Address Withheld Corinne Sereni Address Withheld Tony Sergent Letcher County Public Schools 224 Parks St Whitesburg, KY 41858 David and Linda Setzer 76 Texas Avenue Whitesburg, KY 41858 Jeannie Sexton 395 Sunset View Loop Mayking, KY 41837 Lovell Sexton Address Withheld 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 11-9 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Michael Sexton 3703 Thornton Rd Thornton, KY 41855 Sybil Shell 20 Autumn Winds Lane Whitesburg, KY 41858 Michael Shepherd 24 Brett Dr. Whitesburg, KY 41858 Caleb Short 200 Alaska Ave, Apt 223 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Susan Short 255 Highway 1087 East Leburn, KY 41831 Carl Shoupe P.O. Box 185 Benham, KY 40807 Robert Shubert 72 Goodwater Circle Jenkins, KY 41537 Eugene Slone 122 Company Br Ermine, KY 41815 Joshua Smallwood 466 Pine Valley Rd Hazard, KY 41701 Sharon Smallwood 84 Hummingbird Ln Jenkins, KY 41537 Ada Smith Address Withheld Kyle Smith Address Withheld Nathan Snowden 14 Dye Addition Whitesburg, KY 41858 Juanita Spangler 202 Frogpond Lane Whitesburg, KY 41858 Dena Sparkman Address Withheld Duran/Dena Sparkman 99 Royal Melbourne Ln Jenkins, KY 41537 Major Sparks 440 Foothills Rd Whitesburg, KY 41858 Marjorie Sparks 874 Highway 3406 Mayking, KY 41837 Raphael Sperry Architects/Designers/Planners for Social Responsibility Address Withheld Paul Stambaugh 230 Chopping Branch McRoberts, KY 41835 Howard Stanfill P.O. Box 363 Blackey, KY 41804 James Stephens P.O. Box 299 Jenkins, KY 41537 Stop Mass Incarceration KY 2369 Aristocracy Circle Lexington, KY 40509 Amanda Stunp 600 Highway 3408 Blackey, KY 41858 Stacey Sturgill P.O Box 776 Lynch, KY 40855 Calvin Tackett 40 Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Michael Thornsberry 7266 Highway 582 Pine Top, KY 41843 Lisa Tidal 18 Collier Court Whitesburg, KY 41858 Panagiotti Tsolkas Tanya Turner HRDC’s Prison Ecology P.O. Box 463 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Project Address Withheld Freda Turnmyre 11984 Highway 805 Jenkins, KY 41537 Priscilla Tyler 52 Tyler Ln Whitesburg, KY 41858 11-10 Grace Walters 519 Lakeside Dr. Jenkins, KY 41537 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Katie and Marlene Walters 350 Ironwood Dr Hallie, KY 41821 Jim Ward P.O. Box 630 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Anthony Warlick 2928 Highway 343 McRoberts, KY 41835 Thomas Watko 27 Della Drive Whitesburg, KY 41858 Bonnell Watts 247 Croses Br. Letcher, KY 41832 Deborah Watts P.O. Box 74 Jenkins, KY 41537 Earnest Watts 75 Watts Dr Cornettsville, KY 41731 Freddie Watts 310 Old Dixon Road Blackey, KY 41804 Jenna Watts P.O. Box 34 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Ken Watts 180 Old Dixon Rd Blackey, KY 41804 Tyler and Linda Watts 310 Old Dixon Road Blackey, KY 41804 Charles and Tina Whitaker P.O. Box 217 Cromona, KY 41810 Ivan Whitaker 9024 Highway 588 Roxana, KY 41858 Larry and Betty Whitaker 236 Scarlett Lane Neon, KY 41840 Marion Whitaker 481 C. Hill Rd. Cornettsville, KY 41731 Mary Whitaker 5442 Highway 1103 Hallie, KY 41821 Ricky Whitaker 820 Tolby Branch Hallie, KY 41821 Pamela White P.O. Box 493 Jenkins, KY 41357 Shellie Williams P.O. Box 23 Whitesburg, KY 41858 Brady Wilson P.O. Box 444 Ermine, KY 41815 Women in Transition P.O. Box 1808 Louisville, KY 40201 Working Narratives 1512 Orange St Wilmington, NC 28401 Brian Wright 227 Low Gap Branch Isom, KY 41824 Donald and Mary Wright 2804 Highway 3406 Jenkins, KY 41537 Jennifer Wright P.O. Box 255 Mayking, KY 41838 Jenny Wright 1013 Lucerne Ave Lake Worth, FL 33460 Mitchell Wright P.O. Box 9 Isom, KY 41824 Paul Wright Human Rights Defense Center P.O. Box 1151 Lake Worth, FL 33460 Heather Yates 155 Barton Branch Partridge, KY 40862 Denise Yonts Letcher County Public Schools 224 Parks St Whitesburg, KY 41858 Don and Melissa Young 1589 Highway 343 Neon, KY 41840 Fred Young 1117 Highway 343 Neon, KY 41840 Mark Young P.O. Box 45 McRoberts, KY 41835 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 11-11 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Mark and Deborah Young 279 Wintergreen Drive McRoberts, KY 41835 In addition to the agencies, individuals, and organization listed above, notification of the availability of the Revised Final EIS was sent to 34 individuals who requested their name and address be withheld. Libraries Harry M. Caudill Memorial Library 220 Main Street Whitesburg, KY 41858 Jenkins Public Library 9543 Highway 805 Jenkins, KY 41537 Blackey Public Library 295 Main St. Loop Blackey, KY 41804 Lillian Webb Memorial Library 1049 Highway 317 Neon, KY 41840 11-12 11.0 Distribution List March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX A AGENCY COORDINATION Appendix A March 2016 A-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) A-2 Appendix A March 2016 STEVEN l. 8ESHEAR BoB STEWART TOURISM, ARTS AND HERITAGE CABINET KENTUCKY HERITAGE COUNCIL GOVERNOR THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 300 WASHINGTON STREET FRANKFORT,KENTUCKY40601 PHONE(502)564-7005 FAX(502)564-5820 SECRETARY CRAIG A. POTTS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER www.heritage.ky.gov April 24, 2014 Issac Gaston United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Capacity Planning and Site Selection Branch 320 First St. NW Washington, DC 20534 Re: Historic Architectural Resources Survey for Proposed Federal Correctional Facility, Letcher County, Kentucky Dear Mr. Gaston: On March 27, we received the above referenced report for review and comment. Six historic resources (LR-149 through 153 and LR-188) were evaluated. None ofthe sites are considered eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, and the consultant recommends no further work. We concur with the results of the survey. If you have questions regarding these comments, please contact Jill Howe of my staff at 502-564-7005, ext. 121. Sincerely, CZ>~I?K..Craig A. Potts Executive Director and State Historic Preservation Officer CP:jh KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com -ventu~ ~~UNBRIDLED SPIRIT'!/. An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Kentucky Ecological Services Field Office 330 West Broadway, Suite 265 Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 (502) 695-0468 August 7, 2014 Ms. Deborah Henson Cardno Tec 18 S. George Street, Suite 400 York, PA 17401 Re: FWS 2013-B-0627; Federal Bureau of Prisons; proposed federal penitentiary; located in Letcher County, Kentucky Dear Ms. Henson: Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the above-referenced project. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed this proposed project and offers the following comments in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). This is not a concurrence letter. Please read carefully, as further consultation with the Service may be required. In accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the Service has reviewed the project with regards to the effects the proposed actions may have on wetlands and/or other jurisdictional waters. We recommend that project plans be developed to avoid impacting wetland areas and/or streams, and reserve the right to review any required federal or state permits at the time of public notice issuance. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted to assist you in determining if wetlands or other jurisdictional waters are present or if a permit is required. In accordance to section 7 of the ESA, the Service must evaluate the potential for all the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of a proposed project on federally listed species. This includes effects of any "interrelated actions" that are part of a larger action and depend on the larger action for their justification and "interdependent actions" that have no independent utility apart from the action under consideration. Please include information about all of the potential impacts associated with the proposed project, including those from interrelated or interdependent actions (e.g.; utilities, etc.) and future actions that are reasonably certain to occur as a result of the proposed project. In order to assist you in determining if the proposed project has the potential to impact protected species we have searched our records for occurrences of listed species within the vicinity of the proposed project. Based upon the information provided to us and according to our databases, we believe that the following federally listed species have the potential to occur within the project vicinity: Group Mammals Fishes Species Common name Legal* Status Myotis sodalis Indiana bat E Myotis grisescens gray bat E Myotis septentrionalis northern long-eared bat P Etheostoma sagitta spilotum Kentucky arrow darter C * Key to notations: E - Endangered, 7' - Threatened P - Proposed, C - Candidate, CH - Critical Habitat We must advise you that collection records available to the Service may not be all-inclusive. Our database is a compilation of collection records made available by various individuals and resource agencies. This information is seldom based on comprehensive surveys of all potential habitats and thus does not necessarily provide conclusive evidence that protected species are present or absent at a specific locality. Indiana bat The entire state of Kentucky is within the range of the Indiana bat; (1) caves, rockshelters, and abandoned underground mines provide suitable wintering habitat for the Indiana bat; and (2) forested areas provide suitable summer roosting and foraging habitat for the Indiana bat. In order to address the concerns and be in compliance with the ESA, we have the following recommendations relative to potential direct and/or indirect effects as a result of impacts to the habitats listed above: (1) During hibernation, the Indiana bat prefers limestone caves, sandstone rockshelters, and abandoned underground mines with stable temperatures of 39 to 46 degrees F and humidity above 74 percent but below saturation. Prior to hibernation, Indiana bats utilize the forest habitat up to five miles from the hibernacula to feed and roost until temperatures drop to a point that forces them into hibernation. This "swarming" period is dependent upon weather conditions and lasts from about September 15 to about November 15. This is a critical time for Indiana bats, since they are acquiring additional fat reserves and mating prior to hibernation. Based on the presence of numerous caves, rock shelters, and underground mines in Kentucky, we believe that it is reasonable to assume that other caves, rock shelters, and/or abandoned underground mines may occur within the project area, and, if they occur, they could provide winter habitat for Indiana bats. Therefore, we recommend that the project proponent conduct a phase 1 winter hibernacula habitat assessment following the March 15, 2014 "Supplemental Indiana bat survey guidance for Kentucky." This assessment should identify any caves, rock shelters, and underground mines and assess their potential as suitable Indiana bat hibernacula. Depending on the results of the habitat assessment, subsequent bat presence/absence surveys may be necessary to determine if the species is using a feature as a hibernaculum. These presence/absence surveys must be conducted between September 1 and October 31 or April 1 and April 21 following the protocol found in the guidance document cited above. (2) The Indiana bat utilizes a wide array of forested habitats, including riparian forests, bottomlands, and uplands for both summer foraging and roosting habitat. Indiana bats typically roost under exfoliating bark, in cavities of dead and live trees, and in snags (i.e., dead trees or dead portions of live trees). Trees in excess of 16 inches diameter at breast 2 height (DBH) are considered optimal for maternity colony roosts, but trees in excess of 9 inches DBH appear to provide suitable maternity roosting habitat. Male Indiana bats have been observed roosting in trees as small as 5 inches DBH. We recommend that the project proponent design or modify the proposed project to eliminate or reduce impacts to suitable Indiana bat habitat, thus avoiding impacts. A habitat assessment may useful in determining if suitable Indiana bat summer roosting or foraging habitat is present in the action area of the proposed project. If suitable habitat removal cannot be avoided, the following are the typical options available to address potential impacts to the species: • The project proponent survey the project site to determine the presence or likely absence of Indiana bats within the project area in an effort to determine if potential effects are likely. A qualified biologist who holds the appropriate collection permits for the Indiana bat must undertake such surveys in accordance with our most current survey guidance. If any Indiana bats are identified, we would request written notification of such occurrence(s) and further coordination and consultation. • The project proponent can request formal section 7 consultation through the lead federal action agency associated with the proposed project. To request formal consultation, the project proponent would need to submit a Biological Assessment that describes the action and evaluates the effects of the action on the listed species in the project area. After formal consultation is initiated, the Service has 135 days to prepare a Biological Opinion that analyzes the effects of the action on the listed species and recommends strategies to minimize those effects. • The project proponent may provide the Service with additional information through the informal consultation process, prepared by a qualified biologist, that includes sitespecific habitat information and a thorough effects analysis (direct, indirect, and cumulative) to support a "not likely to adversely affect" determination. "I he Service will review this and decide if there is enough supporting information to concur with the determination. • The project proponent may choose to assume presence of the species in the project area and enter into a Conservation Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Service to account for the incidental take of Indiana bats. By entering into a Conservation MOA with the Service, Cooperators gain flexibility with regard to the removal of suitable Indiana bat habitat. In exchange for this flexibility, the Cooperator provides recovery-focused conservation benefits to the Indiana bat through the implementation of minimization and mitigation measures that are described in the Indiana Bat Mitigation Guidance for the Commonwealth of Kentucky. For additional information about this option, please notify our office. The Payne Gap / Lawson site is in potential Indiana bat habitat; all of the options listed above are appropriate for addressing potential impacts to the species at this site. Because the Roxana site is in known "Pl/P2 swarming" habitat, we already know that the species is present in the proposed project area, and, therefore, further surveys are not necessary. Impacts to the species at the Roxana site should be addressed by using one of the last three bullet points listed above. 3 Gray bat Gray bats roost, breed, rear young, and hibernate in caves year round. They migrate between summer and winter caves and will use transient or stopover caves along the way. Gray bats eat a variety of flying aquatic and terrestrial insects present along streams, rivers, and lakes. Low-flow streams produce an abundance of insects and are especially valuable to the gray bat as foraging habitat. For hibernation, the roost site must have an average temperature of 42 to 52 degrees F. Most of the caves used by gray bats for hibernation have deep vertical passages with large rooms that function as cold air traps. Summer caves must be warm, between 57 and 77 degrees F, or have small rooms or domes that can trap the body heat of roosting bats. Summer caves are normally located close to rivers or lakes where the bats feed. Gray bats have been known to fly as far as 12 miles from their colony to feed. Because we have concerns relating to the gray bat on this project and due to the lack of occurrence information available on this species relative to the proposed project area, we have the following recommendations relative to gray bats. • Based on the presence of numerous caves, rock shelters, and underground mines in Kentucky, we believe that it is reasonable to assume that other caves, rock shelters, and/or abandoned underground mines may occur within the project area, and, if they occur, they could provide winter/summer habitat for gray bats. Therefore, we would recommend that the project proponent survey the project area for caves, rock shelters, and underground mines. Additional evaluation and/or surveys may be necessary if suitable gray bat hibernacula and/or roosting habitat exists in the action area of the proposed project. • Sediment Best Management Practices (BMPs) should be utilized and maintained to minimize siltation of the streams located within and in the vicinity of the project area, as these streams represent potential foraging habitat for the gray bat. Northern long eared bat The northern long-eared bat was proposed for federal listing under the ESA on October 2, 2013. The Service has extended the deadline for the final determination to April 2, 2015. Both proposed project sites are located in "known summer" northern-long-eared bat habitat. During the summer, northern long-eared bats typically roost singly or in colonies in a wide-variety of forested habitats, where they seek shelter during daylight hours underneath bark or in cavities/crevices of both live trees and snags, including relatively small trees and snags that are less than 5 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH). Northern long-eared bats have also been documented roosting in man-made structures (i.e., buildings, barns, etc.) during the summer. According to current winter occurrence data, northern long-eared bats predominately winter in hibernacula that include caves, tunnels, and underground mine passages. - Although species proposed for listing are not afforded protection under the ESA, when a species is listed, the prohibitions against jeopardizing its continued existence and unauthorized take are effective immediately, regardless of an action's stage of completion. Therefore, to avoid significant project delays, we recommend that the project proponent evaluate and address potential impacts to northern long-eared bat summer habitat and winter habitat that is present in the action area of the proposed project. 4 Kentucky Arrow Darter The Kentucky arrow darter is a rather large, brightly colored darter that is restricted to the upper Kentucky River basin in eastern Kentucky. The species' preferred habitat consists of pools or transitional areas between riffles and pools (runs and glides) in moderate to high gradient streams with bedrock, boulder, and cobble substrates. The species' habitat and range have been severely degraded and limited by water pollution from surface coal mining and gas-exploration activities; removal of riparian vegetation; stream channelization; increased siltation associated with poor mining, logging, and agricultural practices; and deforestation of watersheds. A habitat assessment and/or survey may be necessary to determine if impacts to these species are likely as a result of the proposed project. As a federal candidate species, the Service sufficient information on the biological status and threats of the species to propose it as endangered or threatened under the ESA, but development of a proposed listing regulation is precluded by other higher priority listing activities. Candidate species receive no statutory protection under the ESA. The Service encourages cooperative conservation efforts for these species because they are, by definition, species that may warrant future protection under the ESA. Addressing the needs of Kentucky arrow darter before the regulatory requirements associated with a listed threatened or endangered species come into play, would allow future developers, landowners, and other entities greater management flexibility to stabilize or restore the species and its habitat for future projects. In addition, as such threats are reduced and populations are increased or stabilized, priority for listing can be shifted to those species in greatest need of the ESA's protective measures. Ideally, sufficient threats can be removed to eliminate the need for listing. Presence/absence surveys would provide additional information regarding the likelihood that the proposed project would impact Kentucky arrow darter. Surveys would not be necessary if habitat assessments, especially specific conductivity measurements, supported that suitable habitat does not exist in the action area of the proposed project. Thank you again for your request. Your concern for the protection of endangered and threatened species is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions regarding the information that we have provided, please contact Jessi Miller at (502) 695-0468 extension 104. Sincerely, Virgil Lee Andrews, Jr. Field Supervisor 5 ,.. STEVEN l. BESHEAR GOVERNOR w TOURISM, ARTS AND HERITAGE CABINET KENTUCKY HERITAGE COUNCIL THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 300 WASHINGTON STREET FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 40601 PHONE(502)564-7005 FAX(502)564-5820 8os STEWART SECRETARY CRAIG A. POTTS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER www.heritage.ky.gov December 22, 2014 Mr. Issac Gaston, Site Selection Specialist Federal Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street NW Washington, DC 20534 Re: Addendum Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Federal Bureau of Prisons Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Letcher County Kentucky, by Kimberly Sebestyen and Steven Brann (Cardno, Inc). Dear Mr. Gaston: Thank you for your correspondence regarding the above referenced report for an archaeological survey conducted in Letcher County, Kentucky for the proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp project. The survey found no evidence of cultural resources. Therefore, the author concluded that the project will have no adverse effect on cultural resources that are potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. I concur with the author's findings. Therefore, in accordance with 36CFR Part 800.4 (d) of the Advisory Council's revised regulations our finding is that there are No Historic Properties Present within the undertaking's area of potential impact. Therefore, we have no further comments and responsibility to consult with the Kentucky State Historic Preservation Officer under the Section 106 review process on this project is fulfilled. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Yvonne Sherrick of my staff at 564-7005, ext. 113. Sincerely, ~~ Craig A. Potts Executive Director and State Historic Preservation Officer CP:43104 cc. George Crothers, Johnathan Kerr (CRA) KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com l(tz!l!!~ An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Wu.1hington. /)C 2053-1 January 16, 2015 Ms. Jessica Miller United States Fish and Wildlife Service Kentucky Field Office 330 W Broadway, Suite 265 Frankfort, KY 40601 Subject: Phase I Indiana and Gray Bat Survey for the Environmental Impact Statement for new Federal Bureau of Prisons United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp in Letcher County, Kentucky Dear Ms. Miller: Please find attached one copy of the Desktop Analysis and Habitat Survey for the Indiana Bat (Myotis soda/is), Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens), and Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionafis) at two Sites for a Proposed Federal Correctional Facility in Letcher County, Kentucky for your review. The report has been prepared in accordance with your letter dated August 7, 2014. Please contact me with any questions at 202-514-6470 or at igaston@bop.gov. Siy, ~:,,C~::cialist Capacity Branch Planning and Construction From: To: Subject: Date: Walker, Lindsay A. Henson, Deborah FW: Letcher Co TIS - Revised per KYTC Comments Tuesday, May 05, 2015 4:21:35 PM Fyi – From KYTC Central Office From: Brown, Robert F (KYTC) [mailto:RobertF.Brown@ky.gov] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 1:13 PM To: Walker, Lindsay A. Subject: RE: Letcher Co TIS - Revised per KYTC Comments Lindsay, I have no further comments on the TIS. Thank you, Robert Brown, P.E. Division of Traffic Operations Phone 502.564.3020 Fax 502.564.7759 Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Confidentiality Statement - This communication contains information which is confidential. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of distribution, copying, forwarding or use of this communication or the information therein is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please return it to the sender. From: Walker, Lindsay A. [mailto:WalkerLi@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 1:06 PM To: Couch, Greg (KYTC-D12); Collins, Mandy (KYTC-D12); Brown, Robert F (KYTC) Cc: Holbrook, Mary W (KYTC-D12) Subject: Letcher Co TIS - Revised per KYTC Comments Good afternoon, Thanks again for taking the time to review and provide comments on the Letcher County TIS for the new proposed prison. I have incorporated them into the document (as shown by the highlighted sections. Cardno (our client) and the Federal Bureau of Prisons has reviewed and accepted these changes. Please let me know if you have any further comment on them; otherwise we will finalize and include as part of the overall FEIS. Thanks so much! Lindsay Lindsay Walker, PE, PTOE, AICP Traffic / Transportation Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff 1792 Alysheba Way, Suite 230 Lexington, KY 40509 859-245-3869 (office) 859-252-6491 (cell) walkerli@pbworld.com<mailto:mcaclister@pbworld.com www.pbworld.com<http://www.pbworld.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies. ______________________________________________________________________ NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies. From: To: Subject: Date: Walker, Lindsay A. Henson, Deborah FW: Letcher Co TIS - Revised per KYTC Comments Tuesday, May 05, 2015 4:20:40 PM Fyi – from District 12 From: Collins, Mandy (KYTC-D12) [mailto:Mandy.Collins@ky.gov] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 8:01 AM To: Walker, Lindsay A.; Couch, Greg (KYTC-D12); Brown, Robert F (KYTC) Cc: Holbrook, Mary W (KYTC-D12) Subject: RE: Letcher Co TIS - Revised per KYTC Comments I have no further comments. Sorry for the delay. Mandy Collins-Justice From: Walker, Lindsay A. [mailto:WalkerLi@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 1:06 PM To: Couch, Greg (KYTC-D12); Collins, Mandy (KYTC-D12); Brown, Robert F (KYTC) Cc: Holbrook, Mary W (KYTC-D12) Subject: Letcher Co TIS - Revised per KYTC Comments Good afternoon, Thanks again for taking the time to review and provide comments on the Letcher County TIS for the new proposed prison. I have incorporated them into the document (as shown by the highlighted sections. Cardno (our client) and the Federal Bureau of Prisons has reviewed and accepted these changes. Please let me know if you have any further comment on them; otherwise we will finalize and include as part of the overall FEIS. Thanks so much! Lindsay Lindsay Walker, PE, PTOE, AICP Traffic / Transportation Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff 1792 Alysheba Way, Suite 230 Lexington, KY 40509 859-245-3869 (office) 859-252-6491 (cell) walkerli@pbworld.com<mailto:mcaclister@pbworld.com www.pbworld.com<http://www.pbworld.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies. ______________________________________________________________________ NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies. From: To: Subject: Date: Branham, Justin L LRL Henson, Deborah RE: BOP Letcher County EIS (UNCLASSIFIED) Wednesday, June 03, 2015 9:34:12 AM Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Deb, Thank you for sending the summary. As mentioned previously, I hope to get out and take a look at those streams when I get a break in the schedule. However, I was reviewing some previously authorized projects in the Roxana area and there was a recent project issued on a gas line project near the old Consol haulroad that we traveled. I believe that the consultant could very well have the scores that you need for the project. Considering my limited time to be out in the field, I'm unsure when I'll be able to check the streams. If you would want to contact the consultant and ask them about their data, I'd be more than glad to pass their contact information along to you. The data is valid because I have already concurred with it. If this is an option for you, just let me know and I'll give you the contact information. If not, then I'll try and schedule a visit over that way when I get a chance. Justin Branham Team Leader / Regulatory Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Louisville District Eastern Kentucky Regulatory Office 845 Sassafras Creek Road Sassafras, KY 41759 Phone: 606-642-3208 Email: Justin.L.Branham@usace.army.mil Comments on our Regulatory Services are invited: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=regulatory_survey -----Original Message----From: Henson, Deborah [mailto:Deborah.Henson@cardno-gs.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 9:27 AM To: Branham, Justin L LRL Cc: Scheuerman, Clint; igaston@bop.gov Subject: [EXTERNAL] BOP Letcher County EIS Hi Justin, Thanks again for taking the time to meet with us on May 19th. We appreciate your input and help with this project. The following is a summary of our meeting: 1) The Bureau is requesting a preliminary JD of the Roxana site based on the findings of the site visit conducted on May 18, 2015, the 2011 Roxana Wetland Report, and the 2014 Wetland Report. 2) The Bureau will conduct mitigation for wetlands at a 2:1 ratio. Currently, there are approximately 2 acres of wetland impacts anticipated which would result in roughly 4 acres of mitigation, which is anticipated to be covered by the in-lieu fee program. Currently, the in-lieu fee program is $45,000 per acre which would result in payment, at existing costs, of approximately $190,000. The Bureau understands that this cost my increase before the project is ready to obtain permits and begin construction activities. 3) Stream mitigation will be covered at a cost per linear foot based on Ecological Integrity Unit Scores (which range from 0.1 to 1.0) for the impacted streams. The Ecological Integrity Unit Score for each stream impacted is multiplied by the linear feet of impact to that stream and then multiplied by $750.00. 4) Based on our discussion, the USACOE will take some data from the streams to assist the Bureau in obtaining the Ecological Integrity Unit Scores for the impacted streams. USACOE asks that a map with the streams labeled be forwarded to aide in this task (map is attached). 5) The project may qualify for a Nationwide Permit 39, if the District Engineer waives the linear feet/acreage threshold. 6) The Bureau will continue coordination with USACOE throughout the course of the project to ensure all permit requirements and mitigation measures are implemented. If you have any comments or edits to this summary, please let me know and I will revise. Deborah Henson PROJECT MANAGER GOVERNMENT SERVICES DIVISION CARDNO Office (+1) 717-547-6278 Mobile (+1) 717-433-7550 Fax (+1) 717-547-6357 Address 145 Limekiln Road, Suite 100, New Cumberland, PA 17070 Email deborah.henson@cardno-gs.com <mailto:deborah.henson@cardno-gs.com> Web www.cardno.com <http://www.cardno.com> Celebrating 70 Years of Shaping the Future - 1945 - 2015 <http://www.cardno.com/en-us/AboutUs/Pages/70-yearsof-Shaping-the-Future.aspx> This email and its attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). All electronically supplied data must be checked against an applicable hardcopy version which shall be the only document which Cardno warrants accuracy. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution or copying of the information contained in this email and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please email the sender by replying to this message and immediately delete and destroy any copies of this email and any attachments. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Cardno. Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE From: To: Subject: Date: Branham, Justin L LRL Deborah Henson RE: Letcher County EIS (UNCLASSIFIED) Friday, June 26, 2015 9:30:26 AM Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE No. That would be it. I will be working up the JD request and getting you a JD letter back to you. It won't really affect the EIS at all but it will verify your delineation. Justin Branham Team Leader / Regulatory Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Louisville District Eastern Kentucky Regulatory Office 845 Sassafras Creek Road Sassafras, KY 41759 Phone: 606-642-3208 Email: Justin.L.Branham@usace.army.mil Comments on our Regulatory Services are invited: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=regulatory_survey -----Original Message----From: Deborah Henson [mailto:Deborah.Henson@cardno-gs.com] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 9:26 AM To: Branham, Justin L LRL Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letcher County EIS Good morning Justin, I just received the stream data and mitigation calculations from James. We will be submitting those ASAP. I have included the mitigation in the Final EIS. The Bureau will be reviewing the Draft FEIS over the next two weeks, so if you have any comments on the mitigation please let me know and we will include in the Final EIS before it goes out for public review. At this point is there anything else you need prior to the release of the Final EIS? Thanks, Deb Deborah Henson PROJECT MANAGER GOVERNMENT SERVICES DIVISION CARDNO Office (+1) 717-547-6278 Mobile (+1) 717-433-7550 Fax (+1) 717-547-6357 Address 145 Limekiln Road, Suite 100, New Cumberland, PA 17070 Email deborah.henson@cardno-gs.com <mailto:deborah.henson@cardno-gs.com> Web www.cardno.com From: To: Subject: Date: Deborah Henson "Miller, Jessica" RE: FW: Letcher County Indiana and Northern Long-Eared Bat Mitigation Tuesday, June 30, 2015 1:54:00 PM Thanks Jessi. I will make sure that is clear in the mitigation section of the FEIS. Deborah Henson PROJECT MANAGER GOVERNMENT SERVICES DIVISION CARDNO Office (+1) 717-547-6278 Mobile (+1) 717-433-7550 Fax (+1) 717-547-6357 Address 145 Limekiln Road, Suite 100, New Cumberland, PA 17070 Email deborah.henson@cardno-gs.com Web www.cardno.com This email and its attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). All electronically supplied data must be checked against an applicable hardcopy version which shall be the only document which Cardno warrants accuracy. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution or copying of the information contained in this email and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please email the sender by replying to this message and immediately delete and destroy any copies of this email and any attachments. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Cardno. From: Miller, Jessica [mailto:jessica_miller@fws.gov] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 1:49 PM To: Deborah Henson Subject: Re: FW: Letcher County Indiana and Northern Long-Eared Bat Mitigation That looks good, Deb. The only other thing that comes to mind is that tree removal during June and July is not covered under the CMOA. Jessi On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Deborah Henson <Deborah.Henson@cardno-gs.com> wrote: Hi Jessi, I just wanted to follow up on the below email and make sure there is nothing else you need prior to us moving forward with publication of the Final EIS? Thanks, Deb Deborah Henson PROJECT MANAGER GOVERNMENT SERVICES DIVISION CARDNO Office (+1) 717-547-6278 Mobile (+1) 717-433-7550 Fax (+1) 717-547-6357 Address 145 Limekiln Road, Suite 100, New Cumberland, PA 17070 Email deborah.henson@cardno-gs.com Web www.cardno.com This email and its attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). All electronically supplied data must be checked against an applicable hardcopy version which shall be the only document which Cardno warrants accuracy. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution or copying of the information contained in this email and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please email the sender by replying to this message and immediately delete and destroy any copies of this email and any attachments. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Cardno. From: Henson, Deborah Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 9:32 AM To: Jessica Miller (jessica_miller@fws.gov) Cc: igaston@bop.gov Subject: Letcher County Indiana and Northern Long-Eared Bat Mitigation Good morning Jessi, Just a follow up to our May 20, 2015 meeting to discuss mitigation for the Indiana and northern long-eared bat at the Roxana site. Below is the summary of that meeting and subsequent discussions we have had regarding the Roxana site and mitigation. 1) During the May 20 meeting we discussed that approximately 105 acres of summer habitat for the Indian bat and northern long-eared bat would be impacted at the Roxana site. To be covered under the MOA the impacts must be under 100 acres. Subsequently, the impact areas were re-evaluated and impacts will be approximately 92.5 acres. Based on coordination with you on June 11, 2015 you reviewed the map detailing the impact areas and agree that based on this impact assessment, the Roxana site can be covered through the Conservation Memorandum Agreement (CMOA) following the guidance provided in the USFWS's April 2015 Conservation Strategy for Forest Dwelling Bats in the Commonwealth of Kentucky (Conservation Strategy). 2) The CMOA will be put in place between the USFWS and the Bureau when construction funds become available. Mitigation will be in place prior to any disturbance to the site would occur. 3) Mitigation identified in the CMOA would include payment to the Kentucky Natural Lands Trust which would be placed in the Imperiled Bat Conservation Fund. The mitigation payment would be used to acquire, protect, and manage bat habitat in Kentucky. Based on 2015 rates mitigation would range from approximately $930,00.00 to $1.3 million. Mitigation payment will depend on the time of year the habitat is impacted and rates may change prior to construction funding becoming available. 4) Once construction funding is available, the Bureau will meet with USFWS to ensure the CMOA is in place and mitigation requirements are fulfilled prior to any disturbance at the site (excavation, grading, timber removal, etc.). 5) Sediment Best Management Practices would be implemented to minimize sediment being carried to streams on site which may be potential foraging habitat for the gray bat. 6) At this time, based on the Preferred Alternative (Roxana), no formal Section 7 consultation is required for the Letcher County EIS project. Should anything change during the development of the final design site plans, the Bureau will notify USFWS to discuss any changes and how they may effect additional studies and mitigation. Please let me know if you concur with this summary or have any additions or questions. Thanks, Deb Deborah Henson PROJECT MANAGER GOVERNMENT SERVICES DIVISION CARDNO Office (+1) 717-547-6278 Mobile (+1) 717-433-7550 Fax (+1) 717-547-6357 Address 145 Limekiln Road, Suite 100, New Cumberland, PA 17070 Email deborah.henson@cardno-gs.com Web www.cardno.com Celebrating 70 Years of Shaping the Future – 1945 - 2015 This email and its attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). All electronically supplied data must be checked against an applicable hardcopy version which shall be the only document which Cardno warrants accuracy. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution or copying of the information contained in this email and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please email the sender by replying to this message and immediately delete and destroy any copies of this email and any attachments. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Cardno. -Jessica Blackwood Miller Fish & Wildlife Biologist Kentucky Field Office U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 330 W. Broadway, Suite 265 Frankfort, KY 40601 Ph: (502) 695-0468 ext. 104 Fax: (502) 695-1024 SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): ~ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Deborah Henson (Cardno Tee) on 5/12/l!::i. D Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. D Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. D Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ~ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Completed by PM for formatting. D Corps navigable waters' study:. D U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: 0 USGS NHD data. 0 USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. ~ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1: 24, ooo Roxana D USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: D National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: D State/Local wetland inventory map(s). D FEMA/FIRM maps: D 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ~ Photographs:~ Aerial (Name & Date):Google Satellite 10-8-2013 Imagery or~ Other (Name & Date):Field photos submitted 5/12/15 D Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:. D Other information (please specify):. IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. ,/ // (1..£ /,;nJ_ z/u,/zot" l~fM- o~gnature and date of Z -tA9- z,;/{, /'Signatl.(e and date of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) 3 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG 9/4/13 Date: 10:30 Time: Phone Call Meeting Type and Location: NA Recorded by: Luke DuPont, Cardno TEC; Mr. Scott Collins, Paramedic Participant Names and and Captain at the Fleming Neon Fire Department organizations: 606-855-7303 Contact Information: Discussion Points: Luke DuPont called the Fleming Neon fire department to ask to ask questions regarding their personnel, jurisdiction, and equipment. He spoke with Mr. Scott Collins, a Captain at the fire department. Mr. Collins indicated the following: There are a total of between 36 firefighters and EMTs at the Fleming Neon Volunteer Fire Station. Sixteen of which are paid full time employees and twenty are volunteers. The station has seven paramedics and eight EMTs. They only have a single station in Fleming Neon and a substation in Whitesburg. Fleming Neon has two fire engines, 10 ambulances, one tanker truck, one rescue truck, one dive trailer for underwater rescue, one ATV for search and rescue. The run four ambulances during the day and two at night. The firefighters run three crews during the day and one at night The station has with all of the towns in Letcher County. He indicated the Payne Gap site has hydrants or hydrants in close proximity. Spoke with Charles Polly regarding additional questions. Mr. Polly, a firefighter and EMT at Fleming Neon indicated they would be open to discussing an MOU and in the event they were to assist with a fire it would not impact operations. He indicated they are close enough to cover Payne Gap; however, Roxana is a 25 minute drive and they would likely be called in under the overarching mutual aid agreement which covers all of Letcher County. Under the mutual aid agreement all fire departments help out when requested. Action Items or Resolutions: None Page 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG 9/4/13 Date: 11:32 Time: Phone Call Meeting Type and Location: NA Recorded by: Luke DuPont, Cardno TEC; Mr. Mike Dingus, Chief of Participant Names and Police at the Fleming Neon Police Department organizations: 606-855-7900 Contact Information: Discussion Points: Luke DuPont called the Fleming Neon Police Department to ask questions regarding their personnel, jurisdiction, and equipment. He spoke with Mr. Mike Dingus, the Chief of Police for the Fleming Neon Police Department. Mr. Dingus indicated the following: Fleming Neon has three fulltime employees comprised of one police chief and two police officers. In addition they have one volunteer. They have a ratio of citizen to police of 262:1. They would be able to assist the Payne Gap site if required. They are approximately 6 miles from Payne Gap. They provide service 24 hours a day seven days a week, although may have to be dispatched from home. They have a single station in Fleming Neon, three squad cars (one of which is an SUV). They have county wide jurisdiction Action Items or Resolutions: None Page 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG Date: Time: Meeting Type and Location: Recorded by: Participant Names and organizations: 9/4/13 10:15 Phone Call NA Luke DuPont, Cardno TEC; Todd Depriest Public Safety Director for the City of Jenkins City Hall (606) 832 4411 Mr. Depriest Cell (606)-6346958 Contact Information: Discussion Points: Luke DuPont called the Jenkins City Hall to inquire about personnel, equipment, and jurisdiction of the Jenkins’ Police Department and Fire and Rescue and was given Mr. Todd Depriest’s cell phone number. Mr. Depriest is the Public Safety Director for the Town of Jenkins. Mr Depriest indicated the following: Jenkins’ Fire Department There is an average of between 25-28 firefighters at the Jenkins Volunteer Fire Station. In addition, the station has three administrative personnel. All of the firefighters are volunteers and five of them are EMTs. They have 2 stations in Jenkins. The station has 2 fire engines, an 85-foot tower truck, a 65-foot ladder truck, a 2,500 gallon tanker truck, one heavy rescue truck, and an expedition for personnel transport. The station has mutual aid agreements with all other stations in Letcher County and will cover down at another town’s station or assist in firefighting activities. He also indicated that Payne Gap would fall within their jurisdiction. Jenkins’ Police Mr. Depriest also was also knowledgeable about the Jenkins’ police department. He indicated the following: Jenkins has six full time personnel working for the police in Jenkins. Four of them are the actual police, one is the police chief, and the Public Safety Director for the town, Mr. Depriest. He further indicted they are short staffed one person. The ratio of citizens to police officers is approximately 400:1. There is one police station present in Jenkins. Page 1 of 2 The station has 8 squad cars. They have 24 hour coverage with the police officers they have on staff. The Jenkins police have county wide jurisdiction in Letcher County, but are seldom asked by the Sheriff Department of the Kentucky State Police to respond to incidents outside of Jenkins. Mr. DePriest believes the Jenkins Police and Fire Departments would be interested in discussing an MOU with the BOP; however, he would have to defer to the Mayor of Jenkins. Additionally, Mr. Depriest does not believe assisting BOP would result in impacts to current operations. Action Items or Resolutions: None Page 2 of 2 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG 9/4/13 Date: 12:49 Time: Phone Call Meeting Type and Location: NA Recorded by: Luke DuPont, Cardno TEC; Claude Little, Investigative Participant Names and Lieutenant, Kentucky State Police-Hazard Post organizations: 606-435-6069 Contact Information: Discussion Points: Luke DuPont called Mr. Claude Little, an Investigative Lieutenant for the Kentucky State Police, to inquire about personnel, equipment, and jurisdiction for the Kentucky State Police in the vicinity of the BOP proposed action. Mr. Little indicated the following: The Hazard Post covers the southeastern portion of Kentucky and includes five counties to include Letcher County. He indicated that unless called upon by the State Police or the Sheriff’s Office, the local community law enforcement would not assist the state police outside of their respective communities. Due to budget constraints the State Police laid off five officers at the Hazard Post and are subsequently short staffed five officers. They currently have 39 state troopers, 18 dispatchers, three clerks, one custodian, one criminal analyst, and one arson specialist. The SWAT team is not based out of Hazard County. The state police have 39 squad cars, with between 8-10 spares in the event a squad car goes down. They typically do not have anyone on the road between 4 AM to 6 AM. When asked about interest in discussing a possible MOU Mr. Little indicated the State Police would be interested. Additionally, Mr. Little did not believe assisting BOP would impact their operations. Action Items or Resolutions: NA Page 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG 9/4/13 Date: 10:03 Time: Phone Call Meeting Type and Location: NA Recorded by: Luke DuPont, Cardno TEC; Benny Bentley, volunteer Participant Names and firefighter, Whitesburg Fire and Rescue organizations: 606-633-2126 Contact Information: Discussion Points: Luke DuPont called Mr. Benny Bentley at the Whitesburg Fire and Rescue Service to ask questions about their personnel, equipment, and jurisdiction. Mr. Bentley indicated the following: The fire department has 30 firefighters, 25 volunteer and five paid. In addition they have three administrative personnel. Five of the firefighters are also EMTs. The station has five engines, a boom truck with a snorkel. The station has mutual aid agreements with the rest of the county and would be able to help out on anything in the county if dispatched. Gary Mullins, the Fire Chief, answered additional questions regarding interest in an MOU with the BOP and potential impacts to operation. Mr. Mullins indicated Whitesburg Fire and Rescue would be interested in discussing an MOU and indicated their support of BOP would not impact their operations. Action Items or Resolutions: NA Page 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG 9/4/13 Date: 11:05 Time: Phone Call Meeting Type and Location: NA Recorded by: Luke DuPont, Cardno TEC; Garnet Sexton, City Clerk and Participant Names and Treasurer for Whitesburg organizations: 606-633-3700 Contact Information: Discussion Points: Luke DuPont called the Ms. Garnet Sexton, the City Clerk and Treasurer for the City of Whitesburg to inquire about personnel, equipment, and jurisdiction for the Whitesburg Police Department. Ms. Sexton indicates the following: There are nine fulltime employees comprised of six police officers, one chief of police, one second in command, and one secretary. They have a citizen to officer ration of 270:1. They are short staffed one police officer. The department has eight squad cars. The department has one police station in Whitesburg. They provide 24 hour coverage seven days a week. The department’s jurisdiction is limited to the county but could assist at both sites if asked to. Ms. Sexton further indicated that she believe the Whitesburg Police Department would be open to an MOU but the Mayor and Chief of Police of Whitesburg would have the final word. Furthermore, she indicated operations may be impacted in the event they needed to assist. She is concerned there may not be enough proper equipment. Action Items or Resolutions: NA Page 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG 9/4/13 Date: 11:42 Time: Phone Call Meeting Type and Location: NA Recorded by: Luke DuPont, Cardno TEC; Eugene Slone, Victims Participant Names and Advocate for Letcher County Sheriff organizations: (606) 633-2293 Contact Information: Discussion Points: Luke DuPont called the Letcher County Sheriff to inquire about the department. He spoke with Mr. Eugene Slone, Victims Advocate for Letcher County Sheriff. Mr. Slone indicates the following: There are 13 fulltime employees comprised of 10 deputies, and 3 dispatchers. They have 10 squad cars. They have a headquarters in Whitesburg. They provide 24 hour coverage seven days a week. They can provide assistance to both the Payne Gap and Roxana sites. Their jurisdiction is limited to the county. Action Items or Resolutions: NA Page 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG 9/7/13 Date: 2:16 Time: Phone Call Meeting Type and Location: NA Recorded by: Luke DuPont, Cardno TEC; John Amburgey, EMS Participant Names and Lieutenant, Letcher County Fire and Rescue. organizations: 606-633-8058 Contact Information: Discussion Points: Luke DuPont called Mr. John Amburgey, an EMS Lieutenant for Letcher County Fire and Rescue, to inquire about personnel, equipment, and jurisdiction of the Letcher County Fire and Rescue Service. Mr. Amburgey indicated the following: They have 32 firefighters, comprised of 20 paid firefighters and 12 volunteer firefighters. Their jurisdiction is comprised of the southern side of Letcher County. Fifteen of their personnel are EMTs. They have three stations; Jeremiah, Blackey, and Hallie, The have five ambulances, two tanker trucks, and three engines. Roxana is within their jurisdiction. Gary Rodgers, Director of Fire and Ambulance for the Letcher County Fire and Rescue, answered additional questions regarding potential discussion with BOP for an MOU and potential impacts on operations. Mr. Rodgers indicated they would be interested in discussing an MOU and their operations would not be impacted if they needed to assist BOP. Action Items or Resolutions: NA Page 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG 3/6/14 Date: 10:15 Time: Phone Call Meeting Type and Location: NA Recorded by: Luke DuPont, Cardno TEC; Bruce Crouch Laurel Ridge Participant Names and Landfill Manager organizations: Mr. Crouch Office: 606-864-7996 Contact Information: Discussion Points: Luke DuPont called the Laurel Ridge Landfill, which has a transfer station located in Letcher County and spoke with the Laurel Ridge Manager (Bruce Crouch) Mr. Crouch indicated the Laurel Ridge landfill, which the Letcher County transfer station delivers to, is permitted for an additional 34 years. He further indicated he expects the landfill to take at least that long to reach capacity. He also indicated there is potential for expansion of the existing landfill and they may be able to get an additional 20 years of use from an expansion. Currently the landfill receives approximately 40-50 tons of refuse per day. Action Items or Resolutions: None Page 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING/TELEPHONE LOG Date: Time: Meeting Type and Location: Recorded by: 3/12/15 7:00 p.m. Public Meeting NA Deborah Henson, Cardno Project Manager and Robert Meade, Fire Chief, Kings Creek Volunteer Fire Department N/A Participant Names and organizations: Contact Information: Discussion Points: Mr. Meade discussed with Ms. Henson the ability and willingness of the Kings Creek Volunteer Fire Department to work with the Bureau to develop and MOU to assist the proposed facility if it were constructed at the Roxana site. Mr. Meade indicated the fire department is 1.5 miles from the site. Mr. Meade stated that the fire department has 23 volunteers, one pumper truck and two large tanker trucks. In addition to the 23 volunteers the department has relationships with other local volunteer fire departments and has an agreement among these departments to assist one another. A local paging system allows the numerous volunteer fire departments to request assistance from one another. Mr. Meade indicated that participating in an MOU and providing assistance to the facility in the event of an emergency would not impact the Kings Creek Volunteer Fire Department. Action Items or Resolutions: NA Page 1 of 1 (This page intentionally left blank) Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX B EXCAVATION AND GRADING CALCULATIONS Appendix B March 2016 B-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) B-2 Appendix B March 2016 Cardno MM&A 5480 Swanton Drive Lexington, KY 40509 USA Phone +1 859 263 2855 Fax +1 859 263 2839 www.cardno.com October 24, 2014 Mr. Deborah Henson, Project Manager Cardno Government Services Division 145 Limekiln Road, Suite 100 New Cumberland, Pennsylvania 17070 Subject: Revised Earthwork Quantities and Construction Costs; Proposed Federal Correction Facility • Payne Gap and Roxana Sites Cardno MM&A Project No. CARD003 Dear Ms. Henson: Per your request, Cardno MM&A (Cardno) is providing revised earthwork quantities and construction costs for the “Proposed Federal Correction Facility (FCF)” in Letcher County, Kentucky. The original document was prepared for the Payne Gap and Roxana sites and published in a report by Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc. (now Cardno MM&A) titled “Geotechnical Feasibility Report dated June 2012.” Earthwork quantities and construction costs were presented in the 2012 report for both of these sites. The United States Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) provided a conceptual plan for the supporting facilities and access roads for the FCF at both the Payne Gap and Roxana sites. The proposed “cut shading” on the BOP drawing for the Payne Gap site differed from the proposed cut shading in the Cardno 2012 report. There were no adjustments made in the earthwork quantities provided in this letter report related to this difference. The fill slopes for the supporting facilities at Payne Gap and Roxana were designed at 2:1. “Cut” slopes were designed for the two sites at 1:1. Additional geotechnical studies may indicate the cut slopes can be constructed at ½:1 or steeper. Select fill slopes for the access roads at Payne Gap were steeper than 2:1 to accommodate the existing topography. Slopes steeper than 2:1 may require stabilization which was not estimated for this revision. Cardno determined the best fit for the access roads and supporting facilities relative to the topography present at the two sites. Australia • Belgium • Canada • Colombia • Ecuador • Germany • Indonesia • Italy • Kenya • New Zealand • Papua New Guinea • Peru • Tanzania • United Arab Emirates • United Kingdom • United States • Operations in 85 countries www.cardnomma.com Cardno Government Services Division October 24, 2014 Page 2 1 The unit costs for the construction quantities were based on “RSMeans Cost Data” and updated to reflect 2014 costs. The earthwork quantities were determined for the supporting facilities and added to the quantities previously determined for the Payne Gap FCF. A 25 % swell factor was used for all fill at the site. A site plan depicting the facilities along with the earthwork cut and fills is attached to this letter report as Map No. PG-4 (Revised). The additional parking area and additional spoil fill area shown on the site plan for the Payne Gap site were added to the main building area. Payne Gap Earthwork Quantities Unit Cost Item Unit Cost Units Units $/Cubic Meters $/Cubic Yards Soil Excavation $13.08 $10.00 2,136,671 2,794,660 $27,947,657 Rock Excavation $27.47 $21.00 6,206,251 8,117,470 $170,485,715 Structural Fill $3.92 $3.00 1,312,049 1,716,095 $5,143,232 Spoil Fill $1.31 $1.00 9,256,402 12,106,917 $12,125,887 $/Hectare $/Acres Cubic Meters Cost Hectare Cubic Yards Acres $ Dollars $ Dollars Clear Mined Area $740 $300 2.7 7 $1,998 Clear Forest Area $19,030 $7,700 85.3 211 $1,623,259 Total $217,327,748 The earthwork quantities were determined for the supporting facilities and added to the quantities previously determined for the Roxana FCF. Due to space limitations at the site and for cut/fill balancing purposes, all material cut will have to be placed as a structural fill. The swell factor for the rock excavation was 25% and the mine spoil was reduced by 10% for the structural fill. The rock elevations at the prison camp were inferred from borings to the south. The actual rock elevations should be confirmed. Constructing the prison camp at different levels could reduce the amount of rock excavation. A site plan depicting the facilities along with the earthwork cut and fills is attached to this letter report as Map No. RX-4 (Revised). Two locations shown as cut in the main building area will require further investigation. 1 Fortier, Robert, PE, Senior Editor, RSMeans Heavy Construction Cost Data, 28th Annual Edition, A Division of Reed Construction Data, LLC, Construction Publishers & Consultants, 2014. www.cardnomma.com Cardno Government Services Division October 24, 2014 Page 3 Roxana Earthwork Quantities Item Unit Cost Unit Cost Units Units Cost $/Cubic Meters $/Cubic Yards Cubic Meters Cubic Yards $ Dollars Spoil Excavation $13.08 $10.00 Rock Excavation $27.47 $21.00 $3.92 $3.00 Structural Fill $/Hectare $/Acres 7,037,223 9,204,340 $92,046,877 728,809 953,246 $20,020,383 7,188,790 9,402,582 $28,180,057 Hectare Acres $ Dollars Clear Mined Area $740 $300 32.7 81 $24,198 Clear Forest Area $19,030 $7,700 44.4 110 $844,932 Total $141,116,447 The revised earthwork quantities and construction costs are based on the provided conceptual plan and the analysis of same, as well as published data and information collected during the 2012 Geotechnical Feasibility Study. Additional geotechnical studies should be conducted to confirm that the earthwork volumes estimated are adequate to meet the quantified material required for structural fills in the final design. The earthwork quantities were itemized by facility and are presented on the Tables PG-1A and RX-1A attached to this letter report. We reserve the right to amend our computations, if any additional information becomes available. This revision is furnished as privileged and confidential to the addressee. Release to any other company, concern, or individual is solely the responsibility of the addressee. We appreciate the opportunity to have assisted you with this project. Sincerely, W. Dale Nicholson, P.E., P.L.S. Senior Forensic Engineer for Cardno MM&A Direct Line 859-977-8865 Email: Dale.Nicholson@cardno.com WDN/cfn Attachments Map PG-4 (Revised) – “Site Grading – Payne Gap Study Area” Map RX-4 (Revised) – “Site Grading – Roxana Study Area” Tables PG-1A and RX-1A c: File/CARD003 File: Revised Earthwork.docx www.cardnomma.com Cardno Government Services Division Payne Gap/Lawson Site Table PG-1A Volumes by Facility Item (Cubic Meters) Spoil Excavation Rock Excavation Structural Fill Spoil Fill Base Elevation Main Building 1,266,966 5,005,811 883,064 8,096,932 Roadway 95,830 19,850 14,920 40,050 Training Center 356,105 587,430 249,150 414,805 Utility Plant 140,405 185,610 30,890 704,615 Prison Camp 277,365 407,550 134,025 0 495 Varies 480 480 550 CARD003 Roxana-PayneGap - Attachment (2) 10-24-14, PG-1A, 10/24/2014 Total 2,136,671 6,206,251 1,312,049 9,256,402 1 of 1 Cardno Government Services Division Roxana/Meade Farm Site Table RX-1A Volumes by Facility Item (Cubic Meters) Spoil Excavation Rock Excavation Structural Fill Base Elevation Main Building 4,881,322 0 3,322,628 Roadway 445 CARD003 Roxana-PayneGap - Attachment (2) 10-24-14, RX-1A, 10/24/2014 0 169,438 3,742 Training Center 0 0 3,862,420 Utility Plant 1,507,283 0 0 Prison Camp 648,618 559,371 0 Varies 445 451 425 Total 7,037,223 728,809 7,188,790 1 of 1 (This page intentionally left blank) Site Grading - Payne Gap Study Area FUTURE STAFF TRAINING CENTER WITH PARKING PROPOSED FIRING RANGE Notes PROPOSED UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY ADDITIONAL PARKING AREA 91 METER BUFFER ZONE TRAINING CENTER AREA MAIN BUILDING AREA UTILITY PLANT AREA PRISON CAMP AREA PROPOSED GARAGE / LANDSCAPE BUILDING PROPOSED WAREHOUSE PROPOSED UTILITY PLANT WITH RADIO TOWER PROPOSED WASTE WATER SCREENING BUILDING PROPOSED FEDERAL PRISON CAMP Roxana Study Area RT 588 PROPOSED FEDERAL PRISON CAMP Ro ut e 20 36 ell Jew te Sta n i Ma Notes RT 588 PRISON CAMP AREA RT 0 16 RT PROPOSED UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY B ig B ra nc h Tol son Cr 0 16 R RX-01 L ill y nch Bra t t e n Cor T 16 0 RX-07 PROPOSED PARKING RX-06 RX-05 MAIN BUILDING AREA RX-11 Big Branch Tolson Cr 91 METER BUFFER ZONE RX-04 RX-08 PROPOSED WASTE WATER SCREENING BUILDING UTILITY PLANT AREA RX-03 RX-10 PROPOSED GARAGE / LANDSCAPE BUILDING RX-09 PROPOSED FIRING RANGE FUTURE STAFF TRAINING CENTER WITH PARKING PROPOSED OUTSIDE WAREHOUSE PROPOSED UTILITY PLANT WITH RADIO TOWER Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX C AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS Appendix C March 2016 C-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) C-2 Appendix C March 2016 TAB A. SUMMARY Alternative 1 Activity Construction Construction Operations Payne Gap/Larson Site Year 1 2 Yearly Alternative 2 Activity Construction Construction Operations VOC Tons 7.51 7.51 0.70 CO Tons 31.38 31.38 29.33 NOx Tons 104.89 104.89 21.36 SO2 Tons 1.83 1.83 0.18 PM10 Tons 217.39 146.89 1.16 PM2.5 CO2 Tons Metric Tons 26.86 10,913 19.81 10,913 0.58 1,271 CO Tons 12.90 12.90 29.33 NOx Tons 38.68 38.68 21.36 SO2 Tons 0.76 0.76 0.18 PM10 Tons 158.52 106.45 1.16 PM2.5 CO2 Tons Metric Tons 17.87 4,006 12.66 4,006 0.58 1,271 Roxana Site Year 1 2 Yearly VOC Tons 2.99 2.99 0.70 TAB B. CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Alternative 1 - Payne Gap/Larson Table 1.1 Clearing 218 acres Off-road Equipment Dozer Loader/Backhoe Small Backhoe Hours of Operation 2,529 2,529 2,529 Engine HP 145 87 55 Load Factor 0.58 0.21 0.21 Dozer Loader w/ integral Backhoe Small backhoe On-road Equipment Dump Truck Hours of Operation 1,158 Engine HP 230 Speed (mph) 16 Dump Truck Subtotal in lbs Clearing Grand Total in Tons Clearing Grand Total in Metric Tons VOC g/hp-hr 0.38 1.43 1.43 VOC lb 176.60 145.84 92.20 CO g/hp-hr 1.41 7.35 7.35 CO lb 663.13 748.63 473.27 NOx g/hp-hr 4.17 6.35 6.35 NOx lb 1,956.81 646.67 408.81 SO2 g/hp-hr 0.12 0.15 0.15 SO2 lb 54.03 15.15 9.58 PM10 g/hp-hr 0.30 1.06 1.06 PM10 lb 138.78 108.29 68.46 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.29 1.03 1.03 PM2.5 lb 134.61 105.04 66.41 CO2 g/hp-hr 536 692 692 CO2 lb 251,166 70,450 44,538 VOC lb/mile 0.0015 VOC lb 28.56 443 0.22 CO lb/mile 0.0080 CO lb 150.98 2036 1.02 NOx lb/mile 0.0361 NOx lb 677.18 3689 1.84 SO2 lb/mile 0.0000 SO2 lb 0.34 79 0.04 PM10 lb/mile 0.0015 PM lb 28.24 344 0.17 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.0015 PM2.5 lb 27.37 333 0.17 CO2 lb/mile 3.4385 CO2 lb 64,555 430709 195.4 Table 1.2 Site Prep Site Prep - Excavate/Fill (CY) 25,760,829 CY Grading (SY) 1,055,120 SY Off-road Equipment Excavator Skid Steer Loader Dozer (Rubber Tired) Compactor Grader Hours 85,869 103,043 93,336 1,297 375 VOC g/hp-hr 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.34 VOC lb 9,334.40 3,203.99 6,630.48 67.51 46.94 Assume compact 0.5 feet (0.166 yards) = CO NOx SO2 PM10 g/hp-hr g/hp-hr g/hp-hr g/hp-hr 1.21 4.03 0.12 0.22 1.47 4.34 0.12 0.31 1.41 4.17 0.12 0.30 1.57 4.57 0.12 0.32 1.21 4.07 0.12 0.23 CO NOx SO2 PM lb lb lb lb 32,820.31 109,366.82 3,128.13 6,047.26 12,288.30 36,268.76 963.29 2,553.02 24,897.59 73,469.64 2,028.50 5,210.52 268.33 780.18 19.69 54.53 164.93 555.75 15.74 30.80 175,150 CY PM2.5 CO2 g/hp-hr g/hp-hr 0.22 536 0.30 536 0.29 536 0.31 536 0.22 536 PM2.5 CO2 lb lb 5,865.84 14,542,105 2,476.43 4,478,179 5,054.20 9,430,197 52.89 91,526 29.87 73,160 VOC lb/mile 0.0015 CO lb/mile 0.0080 NOx lb/mile 0.0361 SO2 lb/mile 0.0000 PM10 lb/mile 0.0015 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.0015 VOC lb 4,990.66 24,274 12.14 CO lb 26,381.47 96,821 48.41 NOx lb 118,326.87 338,768 169.38 SO2 lb 59.19 6,215 3.11 PM lb 4,935.37 18,832 9.42 PM2.5 CO2 lb lb 4,782.13 11,280,045 18,261 39,895,212 9.13 18,096 Dozer Wheel Loader for Spreading Compactor VOC g/hp-hr 0.34 0.35 0.36 VOC lb 7.32 4.36 8.56 CO g/hp-hr 1.21 1.25 1.34 CO lb 25.69 15.62 31.88 NOx g/hp-hr 4.08 4.23 4.45 NOx lb 86.83 52.96 106.02 SO2 g/hp-hr 0.12 0.12 0.12 SO2 lb 2.45 1.44 2.74 PM10 g/hp-hr 0.23 0.24 0.26 PM10 lb 4.81 2.99 6.12 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.22 0.23 0.25 PM2.5 lb 4.67 2.90 5.94 VOC lb/mile 0.0015 VOC lb 26.91 CO lb/mile 0.0080 CO lb 142.25 NOx lb/mile 0.0361 NOx lb 638.01 SO2 lb/mile 0.0000 SO2 lb 0.32 PM10 lb/mile 0.0015 PM10 lb 26.61 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.0015 PM2.5 lb 25.78 CO2 lb/mile 3.4385 CO2 lb 60,821 Engine HP 243 160 145 103 285 Load Factor 0.59 0.23 0.59 0.58 0.58 Excavator Skid Steer Loader Dozer (Rubber Tired) Compactor Grader On-road Equipment Dump Truck (14 CY) Miles 85,869 MPH 5 Engine HP 230 Dump Truck (12 CY) Subtotal in lb: Site Prep Grand Total in Tons Site Prep Grand Total in Metric Tons Table 1.3 Off-road Equipment Dozer Wheel Loader for Spreading Compactor On-road Equipment Dump Truck Gravel Work Hours 88 111 244 Miles 17,688 CO2 lb/mile 3.4385 8,844 CY Engine HP 185 87 103 Engine HP 230 Dump Truck Load Factor 0.59 0.59 0.43 CO2 g/hp-hr 536 536 536 CO2 lb 11,403 6,703 12,759 Subtotal (lbs): Gravel Work Grand Total in Tons Gravel Work Grand Total in Metric Tons Table 1.4 Concrete Work Foundation Work Sidewalks, etc. Total Off-road Equipment Concrete Mixer Concrete Truck Hours of Operation 375 339 47 0.02 7 0.00 41 0.02 39 0.02 91,686 Note: Assume all excavated soil is accounted for in Excavate/Fill and Trenching Load Factor 0.43 0.43 VOC g/hp-hr 0.69 0.38 VOC lb 0.86 36.60 37 0.02 Concrete Mixer Concrete Truck Subtotal (lbs): Concrete Work Grand Total in Tons Concrete Work Grand Total in Metric Tons Table 1.5 884 0.44 42 6,676 CY 445 CY 7,120 CY Engine HP 3.5 300 215 0.11 CO g/hp-hr 3.04 1.75 CO lb 3.79 168.36 172 0.09 Emission Factors NOx SO2 PM10 g/hp-hr g/hp-hr g/hp-hr 6.17 0.13 0.54 6.18 0.11 0.27 Annual Emissions NOx SO2 PM lb lb lb 7.68 0.16 0.67 25.91 596.22 10.99 27 604 11 0.30 0.01 0.01 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.52 0.26 PM2.5 lb 0.65 25.14 26 0.01 CO2 g/hp-hr 588 530 CO2 lb 732 51,102 51,834 24 Building Construction 360,497 SF Foundation 802,922 SF Total Off-road Equipment Crane Concrete Truck Diesel Generator Telehandler Scissors Lift Skid Steer Loader Pile Driver All Terrain Forklift Hours of Operation 4,015 4,015 3,212 8,029 6,423 4,015 9,295 161 Engine HP 330 300 40 99 83 67 260 84 Load Factor 0.58 0.43 0.43 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.43 0.59 VOC g/hp-hr 0.25 0.19 0.26 0.51 0.51 1.69 0.46 0.51 CO g/hp-hr 1.22 1.45 1.41 3.94 3.94 7.97 1.55 3.94 VOC lb 416.23 214.20 31.97 526.84 353.35 592.11 1063.00 8.94 CO lb 2065.88 1660.73 171.58 4073.46 2732.10 2787.66 3555.00 69.13 VOC lb/mile 0.0015 VOC lb 1319.21 4,526 2.26 CO lb/mile 0.0080 CO lb 6973.59 24,089 12.04 Crane Concrete Truck Diesel Generator Telehandler Scissors Lift Skid Steer Loader Pile Driver All Terrain Forklift On-road Equipment Delivery Truck Hours of Operation 19,270 Engine HP 265 Speed (mph) 45 Delivery Truck Subtotal (lbs): Building Construction Grand Total in Tons Building Construction Grand Total in Metric Tons Paving Pavement - Surface Area Paving - HMA Hours of Off-road Equipment Operation Engine HP Grader 717 145 Roller 1,076 401 Paving Machine 1,434 164 Asphalt Curbing Machine 143 130 Emission Factors NOx SO2 PM10 g/hp-hr g/hp-hr g/hp-hr 5.26 0.11 0.21 4.32 0.12 0.21 3.51 0.11 0.23 4.93 0.13 0.52 4.93 0.13 0.52 6.70 0.15 1.19 5.90 0.11 0.31 4.93 0.13 0.52 Annual Emissions NOx SO2 PM lb lb lb 8910.25 193.24 351.89 4933.15 131.71 239.84 427.25 13.14 28.24 5096.29 132.25 538.81 3418.12 88.70 361.38 2343.40 51.99 416.05 13520.50 260.50 719.00 86.48 2.24 9.14 NOx lb/mile 0.0361 NOx lb 31278.14 70,014 35.01 SO2 lb/mile 0.0000 SO2 lb 15.65 889 0.44 PM lb/mile 0.0015 PM lb 1304.60 3,969 1.98 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.51 0.51 1.15 0.30 0.51 CO2 g/hp-hr 530 536 536 595 595 691 530 595 PM2.5 lb 341.33 232.65 27.39 522.64 350.54 403.57 697.00 8.87 CO2 lb 898,343 612,276 65,301 614,797 412,349 241,715 1,213,343 10,433 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.0015 PM2.5 lb 1264.09 3,848 1.92 CO2 lb/mile 3.4385 CO2 lb 2,981,731 7,050,288 3,198 Table 1.6 234,173 SF 117,087 CF Load Factor 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 Grader Roller VOC g/hp-hr 0.38 0.34 0.38 0.40 VOC lb 50.91 191.53 4,337 CY CO g/hp-hr 1.41 2.46 1.44 1.57 CO lb 191.01 1,381.86 NOx g/hp-hr 4.16 5.53 4.25 4.57 NOx lb 562.86 3,105.60 SO2 g/hp-hr 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 SO2 lb 15.59 64.67 PM g/hp-hr 0.30 0.34 0.30 0.32 PM lb 40.00 190.04 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.29 0.33 0.29 0.31 PM2.5 lb 38.80 184.34 CO2 g/hp-hr 536 536 536 536 CO2 lb 72,458 300,633 On-road Equipment Dump Truck Water Truck Hours of Operation 865 23 Paving Machine Asphalt Curbing Machine 116.27 9.58 441.36 38.09 1,301.01 110.74 35.26 2.79 91.79 7.74 89.04 7.51 163,901 12,991 Productivity based Speed 0 10 VOC lb/mile 0.001521 0.001521 VOC lb 21.99 0.35 CO lb/mile 0.008042 0.008042 CO lb 116.26 1.85 NOx lb/mile 0.036070 0.036070 NOx lb 521.44 8.28 SO2 lb/mile 1.80E-05 1.80E-05 SO2 lb 0.26 0.00 PM lb/mile 0.001504 0.001504 PM lb 21.75 0.35 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.001458 0.001458 PM2.5 lb 21.07 0.33 CO2 lb/mile 3.438541 3.438541 CO2 lb 49,709 789 PM10 lb 352 0.18 PM2.5 lb 341 0.17 CO2 lb 600,480 Engine HP 230 230 Dump Truck Water Truck Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Standard Hot Mix Asphalt Table 1.7. Volume of Weight of HMA HMA (tons) (ft3) 117,087 8,489 VOC lb/ton 0.04 Subtotal (lbs): Paving Grand Total in Tons Paving Grand Total in Metric Tons Year Year 1 Year 2 Fugitive Dust Emissions PM 10 tons/acre/ mo acres 0.42 65.40 0.42 43.60 Year Year 1 Year 2 Total Emissions VOC Tons 7.51 7.51 Table 1.8 CO Tons 31.38 31.38 VOC lb 339.55 730 0.37 NOx Tons 104.89 104.89 2,170 1.09 NOx lb 5,610 2.80 SO2 lb 119 0.06 272 days of disturbance 154 154 CO lb - PM2.5/ PM10 Total 211.5 141.0 PM10 Ratio 0.1 0.1 PM2.5 Total 21.2 14.1 SO2 Tons 1.83 1.83 PM10 Tons 217.39 146.89 PM2.5 CO2 Tons Metric Tons 26.86 10,913 19.81 10,913 VOC g/hp-hr 0.38 1.43 1.43 VOC lb 130.42 107.70 68.09 CO g/hp-hr 1.41 7.35 7.35 CO lb 489.74 552.88 349.52 NOx g/hp-hr 4.17 6.35 6.35 NOx lb 1,445.16 477.59 301.92 SO2 g/hp-hr 0.12 0.15 0.15 SO2 lb 39.90 11.19 7.07 PM10 g/hp-hr 0.30 1.06 1.06 PM10 lb 102.49 79.98 50.56 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.29 1.03 1.03 PM2.5 lb 99.42 77.58 49.04 CO2 g/hp-hr 536 692 692 CO2 lb 185,494 52,030 32,892 VOC lb/mile 0.0015 CO lb/mile 0.0080 NOx lb/mile 0.0361 SO2 lb/mile 0.0000 PM10 lb/mile 0.0015 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.0015 CO2 lb/mile 3.4385 VOC lb 21.09 327 0.16 CO lb 111.50 1504 0.75 NOx lb 500.12 2725 1.36 SO2 lb 0.25 58 0.03 PM lb 20.86 254 0.13 PM2.5 lb 20.21 246 0.12 CO2 lb 47,676 318092 Alternative 2 - Roxana Table 2.1 Clearing 161 acres Off-road Equipment Dozer Loader/Backhoe Small Backhoe Hours of Operation 1,868 1,868 1,868 Engine HP 145 87 55 Load Factor 0.58 0.21 0.21 Dozer Loader w/ integral Backhoe Small backhoe On-road Equipment Dump Truck Hours of Operation 855 Engine HP 230 Speed (mph) 16 Dump Truck Subtotal in lbs Clearing Grand Total in Tons Clearing Grand Total in Metric Tons 144.3 Table 2.2 Site Prep Site Prep - Excavate/Fill (CY) 8,124,680 CY Grading (SY) 779,240 SY Off-road Equipment Excavator Skid Steer Loader Dozer (Rubber Tired) Compactor Grader Hours 27,082 32,499 29,437 958 277 Engine HP 243 160 145 103 285 Load Factor 0.59 0.23 0.59 0.58 0.58 VOC g/hp-hr 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.34 VOC Assume compact 0.5 feet (0.166 yards) = CO NOx SO2 PM10 g/hp-hr g/hp-hr g/hp-hr g/hp-hr 1.21 4.03 0.12 0.22 1.47 4.34 0.12 0.31 1.41 4.17 0.12 0.30 1.57 4.57 0.12 0.32 1.21 4.07 0.12 0.23 CO NOx SO2 PM 787,517 CY PM2.5 CO2 g/hp-hr g/hp-hr 0.22 536 0.30 536 0.29 536 0.31 536 0.22 536 PM2.5 CO2 lb 2,943.97 1,010.50 2,091.18 49.86 34.67 lb 10,351.16 3,875.59 7,852.42 198.17 121.81 lb 34,493.08 11,438.76 23,171.51 576.19 410.44 lb 986.58 303.81 639.77 14.54 11.62 lb 1,907.24 805.19 1,643.34 40.27 22.75 lb 1,850.02 781.04 1,594.04 39.06 22.06 lb 4,586,419 1,412,368 2,974,180 67,595 54,031 VOC lb/mile 0.0015 CO lb/mile 0.0080 NOx lb/mile 0.0361 SO2 lb/mile 0.0000 PM10 lb/mile 0.0015 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.0015 CO2 lb/mile 3.4385 VOC lb 206.00 6,336 3.17 CO lb 1,088.97 23,488 11.74 NOx lb 4,884.29 74,974 37.49 SO2 lb 2.44 1,959 0.98 PM lb 203.72 4,623 2.31 PM2.5 lb 197.40 4,484 2.24 CO2 lb 465,617 9,560,210 Excavator Skid Steer Loader Dozer (Rubber Tired) Compactor Grader On-road Equipment Dump Truck (14 CY) Hours 27,082 MPH 5 Engine HP 230 Dump Truck (12 CY) Subtotal in lb: Site Prep Grand Total in Tons Site Prep Grand Total in Metric Tons Table 2.3 Gravel Work Off-road Equipment On-road Equipment Dump Truck 8,571 CY Dozer Wheel Loader for Spreading Compactor VOC g/hp-hr 0.34 0.35 0.36 VOC lb 7.09 4.23 8.30 CO g/hp-hr 1.21 1.25 1.34 CO lb 24.90 15.13 30.90 NOx g/hp-hr 4.08 4.23 4.45 NOx lb 84.15 51.33 102.75 SO2 g/hp-hr 0.12 0.12 0.12 SO2 lb 2.38 1.40 2.66 PM10 g/hp-hr 0.23 0.24 0.26 PM10 lb 4.66 2.89 5.93 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.22 0.23 0.25 PM2.5 lb 4.52 2.81 5.76 VOC lb/mile 0.0015 VOC lb 26.08 46 0.02 CO lb/mile 0.0080 CO lb 137.86 209 0.10 NOx lb/mile 0.0361 NOx lb 618.31 857 0.43 SO2 lb/mile 0.0000 SO2 lb 0.31 7 0.00 PM10 lb/mile 0.0015 PM10 lb 25.79 39 0.02 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.0015 PM2.5 lb 24.99 38 0.02 CO2 lb/mile 3.4385 CO2 lb 58,943 88,855 Hours Dozer Wheel Loader for Spreading Compactor Engine HP 185 87 103 86 107 236 Miles 17,142 Load Factor 0.59 0.59 0.43 Engine HP 230 Dump Truck Subtotal (lbs): Gravel Work Grand Total in Tons Gravel Work Grand Total in Metric Tons Table 2.4 Off-road Equipment Concrete Mixer Concrete Truck Concrete Work Foundation Work Sidewalks, etc. Total Hours of Operation 375 339 6,676 CY 445 CY 7,120 CY Engine HP 3.5 300 Off-road Equipment Crane Concrete Truck Diesel Generator Telehandler Scissors Lift Skid Steer Loader Pile Driver All Terrain Forklift CO2 g/hp-hr 536 536 536 CO2 lb 11,051 6,496 12,366 40 Load Factor 0.43 0.43 Concrete Mixer Concrete Truck Subtotal (lbs): Concrete Work Grand Total in Tons Concrete Work Grand Total in Metric Tons Table 2.5 4,336 Note: Assume all excavated soil is accounted for in Excavate/Fill and Trenching VOC g/hp-hr 0.69 0.38 VOC lb 0.86 36.60 37 0.02 CO g/hp-hr 3.04 1.75 CO lb 3.79 168.36 172 0.09 Emission Factors NOx SO2 PM10 g/hp-hr g/hp-hr g/hp-hr 6.17 0.13 0.54 6.18 0.11 0.27 Annual Emissions NOx SO2 PM lb lb lb 7.68 0.16 0.67 25.91 596.22 10.99 27 604 11 0.30 0.01 0.01 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.52 0.26 PM2.5 lb 0.65 25.14 26 0.01 CO2 g/hp-hr 588 530 CO2 lb 732 51,102 51,834 24 Building Construction 360,497 SF Foundation 802,922 SF Total Hours of Operation 4,015 4,015 3,212 8,029 6,423 4,015 9,295 161 Engine HP 330 300 40 99 83 67 260 84 Load Factor 0.58 0.43 0.43 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.43 0.59 VOC g/hp-hr 0.25 0.19 0.26 0.51 0.51 1.69 0.46 0.51 CO g/hp-hr 1.22 1.45 1.41 3.94 3.94 7.97 1.55 3.94 Emission Factors NOx SO2 PM10 g/hp-hr g/hp-hr g/hp-hr 5.26 0.11 0.21 4.32 0.12 0.21 3.51 0.11 0.23 4.93 0.13 0.52 4.93 0.13 0.52 6.70 0.15 1.19 5.90 0.11 0.31 4.93 0.13 0.52 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.51 0.51 1.15 0.30 0.51 CO2 g/hp-hr 530 536 536 595 595 691 530 595 VOC lb 416.23 214.20 31.97 526.84 353.35 592.11 1063.00 8.94 CO lb 2065.88 1660.73 171.58 4073.46 2732.10 2787.66 3555.00 69.13 VOC lb/mile 0.0015 VOC lb 1319.21 4,526 2.26 CO lb/mile 0.0080 CO lb 6973.59 24,089 12.04 Crane Concrete Truck Diesel Generator Telehandler Scissors Lift Skid Steer Loader Pile Driver All Terrain Forklift On-road Equipment Delivery Truck Hours of Operation 19,270 Engine HP 265 Speed (mph) 45 Delivery Truck Subtotal (lbs): Building Construction Grand Total in Tons Building Construction Grand Total in Metric Tons Paving Pavement - Surface Area Paving - HMA Hours of Off-road Equipment Operation Engine HP Grader 627 145 Roller 940 401 Paving Machine 1,253 164 Asphalt Curbing Machine 125 130 Annual Emissions NOx SO2 lb lb 8910.25 193.24 4933.15 131.71 427.25 13.14 5096.29 132.25 3418.12 88.70 2343.40 51.99 13520.50 260.50 86.48 2.24 NOx lb/mile 0.0361 NOx lb 31278.14 70,014 35.01 SO2 lb/mile 0.0000 SO2 lb 15.65 889 0.44 PM lb 351.89 239.84 28.24 538.81 361.38 416.05 719.00 9.14 PM2.5 lb 341.33 232.65 27.39 522.64 350.54 403.57 697.00 8.87 CO2 lb 898,343 612,276 65,301 614,797 412,349 241,715 1,213,343 10,433 PM lb/mile 0.0015 PM lb 1304.60 3,969 1.98 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.0015 PM2.5 lb 1264.09 3,848 1.92 CO2 lb/mile 3.4385 CO2 lb 2,981,731 7,050,288 3,198 Table 2.6 204,645 SF 102,323 CF Load Factor 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 Grader Roller Paving Machine Asphalt Curbing Machine On-road Equipment Dump Truck Water Truck Hours of Operation 756 20 Engine HP 230 230 Productivity based Speed 17 10 Dump Truck Water Truck Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Standard Hot Mix Asphalt Volume of Weight of HMA HMA (tons) 3 (ft ) 102,323 7,418 VOC lb/ton 0.04 Subtotal (lbs): Paving Grand Total in Tons Paving Grand Total in Metric Tons 3,790 CY VOC g/hp-hr 0.38 0.34 0.38 0.40 VOC lb 50.91 191.53 116.27 9.58 CO g/hp-hr 1.41 2.46 1.44 1.57 CO lb 191.01 1,381.86 441.36 38.09 NOx g/hp-hr 4.16 5.53 4.25 4.57 NOx lb 562.86 3,105.60 1,301.01 110.74 SO2 g/hp-hr 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 SO2 lb 15.59 64.67 35.26 2.79 PM g/hp-hr 0.30 0.34 0.30 0.32 PM lb 40.00 190.04 91.79 7.74 PM2.5 g/hp-hr 0.29 0.33 0.29 0.31 PM2.5 lb 38.80 184.34 89.04 7.51 CO2 g/hp-hr 536 536 536 536 CO2 lb 72,458 300,633 163,901 12,991 VOC lb/mile 0.001521 0.001521 VOC lb 19.22 0.31 CO lb/mile 0.008042 0.008042 CO lb 101.60 1.61 NOx lb/mile 0.036070 0.036070 NOx lb 455.69 7.23 SO2 lb/mile 1.80E-05 1.80E-05 SO2 lb 0.23 0.00 PM lb/mile 0.001504 0.001504 PM lb 19.01 0.30 PM2.5 lb/mile 0.001458 0.001458 PM2.5 lb 18.42 0.29 CO2 lb/mile 3.438541 3.438541 CO2 lb 43,441 690 PM10 lb 349 0.17 PM2.5 lb 338 0.17 CO2 lb 594,113 VOC lb 296.74 685 0.34 CO lb 2,156 1.08 NOx lb 5,543 2.77 SO2 lb 119 0.06 269.48 Table 2.7. Fugitive Dust Emissions Year Year 1 Year 2 Table 2.8 Year Year 1 Year 2 PM 10 tons/acre/ mo 0.42 0.42 Total Emissions VOC Tons 2.99 2.99 days of acres 48.30 32.20 CO Tons 12.90 12.90 disturbance 154 154 NOx Tons 38.68 38.68 PM2.5/ PM10 Total 156.2 104.1 SO2 Tons 0.76 0.76 PM10 Ratio 0.1 0.1 PM10 Tons 158.52 106.45 PM2.5 Total 15.6 10.4 PM2.5 CO2 Tons Metric Tons 17.87 4,006 12.66 4,006 TAB C. OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Factory-fabricated and assembled water-tube flexible tube boilers, dual fired natural gas and fuel oil. Two diesel Emergency Generators -2 megawatts each or 2682 HP each Table 1. Operational Emissions - Emergency Generators Assume the IC engines are typically operated 0.5 hours per week for testing and maintenance = 26 hr/yr Assume additional five 24-hour periods for total power outages per year = Pollutant 120 hr/yr 146 Total Hours Emission Factors Diesel Fuel a, b > 447 kW Generator kW 2000 # 2 Tons/yr VOC CO NOx SO2 PM CO2 lb/yr 503 0.25 lb/yr 4,307 2.15 lb/yr 10,181 5.09 lb/yr 10 0.00 lb/yr 548 0.27 lb/yr 908,447 454 NOx PM 412 SO2 metric tons/yr lb/hp-hr CO c S d VOC CO2 b 0.0055 0.013 0.0007 0.00809 S 0.0015 0.000642 1.16 Emission factors from U.S. EPA. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors - Volume I (AP-42), Section 3.4, 5th Edition; . factors based upon power output c The variable S in the emissions factor equals the sulfur content of the fuel expressed as percent weight. VOC = TOC - methane (9%) d SO2 factor was assumed to equal 0.0015 for diesel fuel. Table 2. Operational Parameters - Boilers 1-02-005-02/03, 1-03-005-02/03 Distillate oil fired Boilers <100 Million Btu/hr Example boiler that is < 100 MM Btu: Emission Factor Pollutant (lb/103 gal)a,b Heat Input (MMBtu/hr)a Fuel Type Annual Hours of Operation 15 15 Oil Oil 5100 5100 Total est. quantity of oil consumed annually 140,000 btu/gal fuel oil Assume heat 10/15 to 4/14 Est. Qty Oil consumed Annually (gal) 759,900 759,900 1,519,800 gal 149 gal/hour fuel consumption @ 80 % efficiency CO 5 NOx PM10 20 1 PM2.5 SO2 VOC CO2 N2O CH4 0.25 0.213 0.34 22,300 0.26 0.216 0.0015 Percent Sulfur content in fuel a 182 heating days 183 non heating days Emission factors from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors - Volume I (AP-42), Section 1.3, 5th Edition. b 3 Emission factors based on burning fuel oil with a heating value of 140 MMBtu/10 gal Table 3. Annual Emissions for Boilers Annual Emissions in lbs PM10 PM2.5 Emission Source VOC CO NOx SO2 Boiler 1 Boiler 2 258 258 3800 3800 15198 15198 162 162 760 760 0.26 3.80 15.20 0.16 0.76 Total in Tons/yr CO2 N2O CH4 190 190 3800 3800 198 198 164 164 0.19 3.80 0.20 0.16 CO2e = 62 metric tons/yr Table 4. Total Annual Emissions for All Equipment Stationary Source Generators Boilers Total VOC t/yr 0.25 0.26 0.51 CO t/yr 2.15 3.80 5.95 Table 5. Commuting Staff NOx t/yr 5.09 15.20 20.29 SO2 t/yr 0.00 0.16 0.17 300 per day 3 Vehicles passenger vehicles PM10 t/yr PM2.5 t/yr CO2e MT/yr 0.27 0.27 412 0.76 0.19 62 1.03 0.46 474 # vehicles 300 # days 365 4 mi/day 40 Tons per Year Metric Tons per Year VOCs lb/mi 8.593E-05 3 CO 3 NOx 3 SO2 3 PM10 lb/mi 5.68927E-05 3 PM2.5 lb/mi 1.067E-02 lb/mi 4.873E-04 lb/mi 7.357E-06 lb/mi 5.19227E-05 VOCs lb 376.36 CO lb 46755.73 NOx lb 2134.28 SO2 lb 32.23 PM10 lb 249.19 PM2.5 lb 227.42 0.19 23.38 1.07 0.02 0.12 0.11 CO2e in metric tons/year Table 6. Total Annual Operating Emissions from Stationary Sources and Commuters Operating Emissions VOC t/yr 0.70 CO t/yr 29.33 NOx t/yr 21.36 SO2 t/yr 0.18 PM10 t/yr PM2.5 t/yr CO2e MT/yr 1.16 0.58 1,271 4,5 CO2 g/mi 182.00 CO2 g 797,160,000 797 797 TAB D. CONSTRUCTION ASSUMPTIONS Buildings Common to both alternatives Project Name Clearing (AC) Central Utility Plant Firing Range Outside Warehouse UNICOR Warehouse* Staff Training Bldg Penitentiary Prison Camp Roads/Parking - Payne Gap Fill/Excavate - Payne Gap Grading - Payne Gap Clearing Payne Gap Payne Gap Total Roads/Parking - Roxana Fill/Excavate - Roxana Grading - Roxana Clearing Roxana Roxana Total Grading (SY) Site Prep Building Building Foundation Excavate/Fill Construction - Construction - Foundation footprint (CY) Total Size (sm) Total Size (sf) footprint (sm) (sf) 1,217 96 3,279 1,375 910 61,654 6,063 13,100 1,033 35,295 14,800 9,795 663,637 65,262 1,217 96 3,279 1,375 910 20,551 6,063 13,100 1,033 35,295 14,800 9,795 221,212 65,262 # Stories Paving (CY) 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 16 1 44 18 12 273 80 243 19 654 274 181 4,097 1,209 4,337 243 19 654 274 181 4,097 1,209 2,168 4,337 3,790 8,844 1,895 445 6,676 3,790 8,571 445 6,676 25,760,829 1,055,120 218 218 1,055,120 25,760,829 74,594 802,922 33,491 360,497 8,124,680 779,240 161 161 779,240 8,124,680 74,594 33,491 Note: *The Air Emissions Calculations were prepared prior to the removal of UNICOR operation from the proposed action. 300 full-time staff Alternative 1. Payne Gap/Larson 753 acres 218 2,794,660 8,117,470 1,540,797 13,307,902 acres cleared CY soil excavation CY rock excavation CY structural fill CY spoil fill Road Estimates Entry road/to warehouses Gravel Work (CY) Concrete Concrete Work Work sidewalks, foundation etc (CY) (CY) 10,912,130 CY total excavation 14,848,699 CY total fill Assume road width of 900 m 18 feet 2,953 ft Total excavation + fill= 25,760,829 USP access Camp access 600 m 2000 m Parking/paved areas 27,480 sf total Alternative 2 700 161 2,928,922 902,757 2,087,607 2,205,394 25 1,969 ft 6,562 ft 11,483 ft total 206,693 SF total Require parking for 100 vehicles per shift; overlap; visitors; deliveries Roxana acres acres cleared CY soil excavated CY rock excavated CY structural fill CY spoil fill ac dynamic compaction 3,831,679 CY total excavation 4,293,001 CY total fill Road Estimates Assume road width of Total length 18 3000 9,843 177,165 feet m ft total SF total Parking/paved areas 27,480 sf total Require parking for 100 vehicles per shift; overlap; visitors; deliveries Total excavation + fill= 8,124,680 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX D ENHANCED UTILITY REPORT Appendix D March 2016 D-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Note: The Enhanced Utility Report was prepared prior to the removal of UNICOR operation from the proposed action. D-2 Appendix D March 2016 Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Federal Bureau of Prisons Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared by: United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons 320 First St NW Washington, DC 20534 October 2014 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2011, Cardno (formerly TEC Inc.) was retained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to conduct a Feasibility Study for the development of a 1,800-bed federal correctional facility to be located at one of three identified sites located near the town of Whitesburg in Letcher County, Kentucky (KY). As part of the Feasibility Study, a Utility Investigation Report was prepared in order to assess the viability and costs associated with providing utilities to each site. The purpose of the utility report was to assess the availability of water, sanitary sewer, natural gas, electricity, and telecommunications for each of the proposed locations. The results of the Feasibility Study have allowed the project to proceed into the next phase, which includes the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). At the conclusion of the Feasibility Study, it was determined that one of the three potential sites is not a viable option for constructing a new BOP correctional facility and therefore the EIS includes the assessment of only two sites. Also, since the conclusion of the Feasibility Study, the size of the facility has been reduced to a 1,200-bed correctional facility. To address this change and account for any other possible changes to the utilities over the past three years, the EIS includes the preparation of this Enhanced Utility Investigation Report. This “enhanced” report replaces the initial Utility Study. All information presented in the original report has been updated to reflect the changes associated with the various utility systems. All pertinent utility information is incorporated into this Enhanced Utility Investigation Report. It is assumed that the on-site utility requirements would be comparable for both sites and that the factors determining the most viable and cost effective option would be related to connecting each of the potential sites to the existing utility infrastructure. Therefore, on-site utilities have not been included in this assessment. The two sites included in this report are Roxana/Meade Farm and Payne Gap, both of which are located within 10 miles of the town of Whitesburg. To determine viability of bringing the utilities to both identified sites, the capacity of the existing utility systems and the distance from the proposed connection points were assessed and cost estimates were prepared. For both sites, water service has been extended or is in the process of being extended to the property lines and the wastewater utility providers have indicated that they intend to extend their existing systems to the proposed sites at no cost to BOP; however, it is likely that BOP will need to provide some cost sharing for the sanitary sewer extension to the Roxana site, if it is selected. Conversations with American Electric Power (AEP), the power provider for both sites, indicate that the existing system has ample capacity to handle the facility at either of the potential locations and there would be no costs to BOP associated with the AEP connection, assuming overhead connections. The telecommunications lines also have adequate capacity to provide service to both sites, but BOP will be responsible for the cost of the necessary infrastructure to connect to the existing telecommunications systems. For the natural gas connection, both sites would require the installation of a meter and tap, which would be the responsibility of BOP. This cost would be comparable at both sites. At the Roxana/Meade Farm site there are multiple gas wells that would need to be closed and abandoned and lines that need to be relocated. This would require a BOP investment of approximately $12.8 million. Similarly there is a well at the Payne Gap site that would need to be abandoned and a 16-inch natural gas line that would need to be relocated around the perimeter of the site. These costs are estimated at $5 million. With respect to capital investment for all utilities, the Roxana site is more costly by nearly $7 million. However, the time associated with abandoning the wells is about six months, compared to a minimum of ES-1 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report two years to relocate the 16-inch gas line at Payne Gap. These cost and schedule factors associated with the natural gas components are critical to the site selection recommendation as it pertains to the utilities. All other utility costs and scheduling factors are relatively comparable and have negligible impacts on site selection. In addition to identifying the most viable location for the construction of a new BOP federal correctional facility, this study identifies some potential options for implementing alternative energy and sustainability practices at the new facility. Kentucky does not lie within a prime area of the country that supports the implementation of a primary wind, solar, or geothermal alternative energy system. However, solar and geothermal systems could be further evaluated for supplementing the power systems at the new facility. This evaluation would be needed after site selection is complete and detailed design planning commences. Additionally, the implementation of practices such as gray water disposal, water reduction efforts, and installation of green roof technology should also be considered during design to help meet sustainability goals. ES-2 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Utility Systems ................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.1 Water .......................................................................................................................................................................3 3.1.3 Natural Gas ............................................................................................................................................................4 3.1.2 3.1.4 4.0 3.1.5 Electric ....................................................................................................................................................................4 Telecommunications.........................................................................................................................................4 UTILITY PROVIDERS..................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 4.2 5.0 Sanitary Sewer .....................................................................................................................................................4 Roxana/Meade Farm ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Payne Gap ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY ............................................................................................... 14 5.1 Alternative Energy ........................................................................................................................................ 14 5.1.1 Wind Energy ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 5.1.3 Geothermal Systems ...................................................................................................................................... 17 5.1.2 5.1.4 Photovoltaics ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 Biomass Energy ................................................................................................................................................ 18 5.2 Sustainability ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 6.0 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Field Photographs............................................................................................................................................................. 21 Appendix 2 – Site Investigation Utility Meetings Memo .............................................................................................................. 31 i BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 - Potential BOP Federal Correctional Facility Locations ......................................................................................... 1 Figure 4-1 - Existing Utilities at Roxana/Meade Farm Site .......................................................................................................... 9 Figure 4-2 - Existing Utilities at Payne Gap Site ..............................................................................................................................13 Figure 5-1 - Kentucky Wind Map ...........................................................................................................................................................15 Figure 5-2 - Photovoltaic Solar Resource of the U.S. .....................................................................................................................16 Figure 5-3 - Geothermal Resource of the U.S. ...................................................................................................................................17 Figure 5-4 - Biomass Resources Available in the U.S. ...................................................................................................................18 LIST OF TABLES Table 4-1 – Utility Providers ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 4-2 – Roxana/Meade Farm Utility Service Opinion of Probable Cost ......................................................................... 7 Table 4-3 – Payne Gap Utility Service Opinion of Probable Cost .............................................................................................11 Table 6-1 – Utility Connection - Probable Cost Comparison......................................................................................................20 ii BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION Cardno has been retained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the development of a 1,200-bed federal correctional facility in Letcher County, Kentucky (KY). Two potential sites located near the town of Whitesburg are currently being considered for the construction of the new facility, as illustrated in Figure 1-1. The two potential sites are identified as Roxana/Meade Farm and Payne Gap. As depicted in Figure 1, the Roxana/Meade Farm site is located less than 10 miles to the west of Whitesburg and the Payne Gap site is located on the Kentucky-Virginia border, less than 10 miles to the east of Whitesburg. This report is being prepared in coordination with the EIS and is designed to investigate the availability, cost, and feasibility of providing utilities to both of the potential sites, identify the pros and cons for each of the sites, and develop recommendations for potential development. Figure 1-1 - Potential BOP Federal Correctional Facility Locations 1 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION This “Enhanced” Utility Investigation Report is an enhancement to the Utility Investigation Report prepared for BOP in 2011. In 2011, Cardno (formerly TEC Inc.) was retained by BOP to prepare the initial Utility Investigation Report, in which three sites were considered. In addition to the two sites that remain under consideration, the third site included the Van Fields Site, just north of Whitesburg, on Route 15. Prior to the initial Utility Investigation Report, several studies had previously been performed in support of the potential construction of a new federal correctional facility at the three potential sites. These studies include: • • • Site Reconnaissance Study prepared by the Louis Berger Group (November 2008) Mine History Reports (each site) prepared by Summit Engineering (August 2010) Site Investigation Trip Memo prepared by KCI Technologies (October 2010) Information from each of these studies was utilized in developing background information, baseline data starting points, initial contact information, and additional evaluation criteria. The Site Investigation Trip memo (KCI 2010) provided ranking criteria for the potential sites. Based on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being the highest), the average utilities rank for the three sites ranged from 2.25 to 3.25, indicating the results of the initial utility assessment were fairly comparable for the three potential sites. However, based on other concerns associated with past mining, accessibility, and excavation requirements, KCI recommended that the Payne Gap site be removed from consideration. Since the purpose of this report is to further assess the utilities, the BOP decided to continue to include the Payne Gap site in this study, as it is still a feasible option. Several other studies were performed concurrently with the initial Utility Investigation Report. One such study was a Topographical and Boundary survey performed by Marshall Miller and Associates (MMA). This survey has allowed realistic layouts of the facilities to be developed within the property boundaries. The layouts along with the elevations at the site will be imperative for infrastructure design, most importantly for establishing requirements for water distribution and sanitary sewer lift stations. 2 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA This section describes the utility needs for the proposed BOP federal correctional facility and the utility design criteria to meet those needs. The initial basis for utility design criteria was outlined in the Site Reconnaissance Study prepared by the Louis Berger Group in November 2008. The criteria outlined in the Site Reconnaissance Study were based on a 1,400 bed facility. This was utilized as an initial starting point for discussions with the local utility providers to determine if the required minimum demand was available, and if not, what would be required to provide utilities to the potential sites. In addition to the minimum criteria, the potential for increased capacity due to future expansions and plans was investigated. The initial population of 1,400 beds for the proposed BOP facility, as discussed in the Site Reconnaissance Study, was initially increased to a 1,800 bed facility in the initial Utility Investigation Report, but has been decreased to a 1,200 bed facility in this final study. 3.1 Utility Systems The design criteria used to assess the utilities in this report are based on providing utilities to the US Penitentiary (USP) and Federal Prison Camp (FPC) facilities. The total capacity for these two facilities is 1,200 inmates and it is estimated that approximately 300 full-time staff would be required to operate the two facilities as well as the ancillary support facilities listed below. The utility usage estimated in this section is based on providing utilities to similar types and sizes of facilities. USP and FPC Support Facilities • Central Utility Plant 1,217 square feet • Firing Range 96 square feet • Outside Warehouse 3,279 square feet • UNICOR Warehouse 1,375 square feet • Staff Training Building 910 square feet 3.1.1 • Water Average Water Demand: USP and FPC Facilities: 215 gallons per day (gpd) per bed x 1,200 beds = 258,000 gpd Utility Plant: 2,000 gpd per acre x 0.03 acres = 60 gpd Warehouses: 1,000 gpd per acre x 0.1 acres = 100 gpd Training Building: 20 gpd per person x 300 people = 6,000 gpd Total Average Water Demand = 264,160 gpd or approximately 185 gallons per minute (gpm) • • • • • Peak Water Demand: 4 times average water demand 185 gpm x 4 = 740 gpm Fire Flow Requirement: 2,000 gpm for four hours Minimum Water Pressure: 40 pounds per square inch (psi) Preferred Water Pressure: 80 psi Water Storage Capacity: 500,000 gallons [The utility provider must be able to meet peak demands and fire flow requirements during select periods when the tank is taken off-line for maintenance and repairs] 3 BOP – Letcher County 3.1.2 • • Sanitary Sewer Natural Gas Usage based on typical correctional facility: Annual Energy Usage: 50 – 70 million cubic feet (mcf) Maximum Hourly Usage: 25,000 – 28,000 cubic feet per hour (cfph) Maximum Daily Usage: 250,000 – 280,000 cubic feet (cf) 3.1.4 • Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Average Wastewater Flow: 85% of Average Water Demand 264,160 gpd x 0.85 ~ 225,000 gpd 156 gpm Peak Wastewater Flow: 3.5 times average wastewater flow 156 gpm x 3.5 = 546 gpm 3.1.3 • **DRAFT** Electric Usage based on typical correctional facility: System Requirements: 12–15 kilovolt (kV) system with 3-phases and 4-wire components Average Energy Usage: 18 – 19 million kilowatt hours (kWh) Demand Load: 4,500 – 5,000 kilowatts (kW) On-site Transformer Requirements: 5,000 kilovolt ampere (kVa) 3.1.5 Telecommunications Telecommunications service also includes internet and security connections for communications with outside correctional officials and facilities. The minimum requirements for new construction, generally coordinated through the local telecommunications company, include: • • • • Primary Rate Interface (PRI) T1 for the Federal Telecommunications System Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) T1 for local calls 200 pair copper 400 continuous Direct Inward Dialing (D.I.D.) numbers 4 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report 4.0 UTILITY PROVIDERS The information regarding utility providers for the five utility systems listed in Section 3.0 was gathered through phone conversations, email communications, and on-site meetings held with the individual utility providers for each of the sites during the preparation of the initial Utility Investigation Report. The Letcher County Water and Sewer District (LWSD) provides sanitary sewer service to the Roxana/Meade Farm site through the Whitesburg Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The Whitesburg WWTP was recently upgraded in anticipation of the proposed BOP federal correctional facility to a capacity of 600,000 gpd with an average load of 300,000 gpd. The facility was built with the ability to phase-in upgrades as necessary to handle additional flows. The LWSD is in the process of upgrading and connecting all of the county’s water systems in order to provide redundancy in the system. These plans have included connections between all the existing water systems, and new connections in the city of Jenkins and Fleming Neon. Water service has been or is in the process of being extended to both potential BOP sites. American Electric Power (AEP) provides electricity in the vicinity of both sites. AEP recently constructed a 4 megawatt facility in the vicinity of the Roxana site for a gas co-generation plant. The plant was never constructed; therefore, there is ample capacity in the existing system to handle the additional load from a new BOP facility, regardless of site selection. Telecommunication and natural gas lines are provided by various utility providers. The providers are listed in Table 4-1, and the systems adjacent to the Roxana/Meade Farm and Payne Gap sites are discussed further in Sections 4.1 and 4.2, respectively. In addition, a brief discussion is provided for each site, which includes estimates of probable connection costs, summaries of the advantages and disadvantages associated with utility connections to each site, a map of each site, and the locations of the existing utility infrastructure. Table 4-1 – Utility Providers Utility Providers Site Water Wastewater Roxana/Meade Farm LWSD LWSD Payne Gap LWSD City of Jenkins Natural Gas Equitable Gas (EQT) & Clean Gas Inc./Hayden Harper EQT 5 Electric Telecommunication AEP Birch Communications AEP Windstream BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report 4.1 Roxana/Meade Farm The Roxana/Meade Farm property is located southwest of Whitesburg, with existing access from Route 160 east of the intersection with State Highway 588. As described in Summit Engineering’s (2010) Mine History Report, the property has past mountaintop mining with approximately 30 feet of spoils and has a level top. There are multiple gas lines and wells throughout the area of interest. Water Service: Public water would be provided by the LWSD. LWSD is in the process of extending their water system to the eastern property boundary of the proposed Roxana site. Therefore, to bring water to the new BOP federal correctional facility, the connection would be limited to a tap on the existing system near the property boundary and the installation of on-site infrastructure. The new line being run to the site is an 8-inch pipeline and should be adequate to meet the 80 psi pressure requested for the BOP facilities. This water system is capable of providing 4 million gallons per day to the region, which is ample capacity to meet the needs of the new BOP facilities. Sanitary Sewer Service: LWSD would also be providing sanitary sewer service to the proposed Roxana site. As with the water service, LWSD is also extending their wastewater collection service, but the extension has not yet been completed as far as the proposed Roxana site. Currently, the connection point is approximately 2.75 miles from the proposed site. To connect to the existing system, construction of a lift station would be required as well as the installation of approximately 2.75 miles of a new collection system. Although the initial intention of LWSD was to construct the required extension all the way to the proposed site at no cost to the BOP, LWSD would likely need some funding assistance to complete the extension of the collection system to the proposed site. This assistance may need to be provided by or be facilitated by BOP. For the purposes of this report, it is assumed that LWSD would require 50% contribution from BOP for this extension. Natural Gas: The site consists of multiple gas wells and gas transmission lines. Currently there are 14 Hayden Harper gas wells and 1 EQT gas well within the Roxana/Meade Farm property. Since the BOP does not own or operate gas wells and does not become involved in mineral rights, all wells within the property boundary would need to be closed and abandoned, regardless of proximity to proposed facilities. It would take up to six months to close and abandon these wells. The cost associated with closure and abandonment of wells can range from $300,000 to $1,000,000. Due to the large production potential of many of the wells at this site, it is estimated that each closure would cost approximately $850,000. To abandon all 15 wells, the associated costs would be approximately $12.75 million. There would also be a connection fee for BOP to connect to the natural gas distribution system. Since the system is in close proximity to the site, the connection would be limited to the cost of the meter and tap, which is estimated at $110,000. Electric Power: As indicated in Section 4.0, AEP has sufficient capacity in the immediate vicinity to supply power to the proposed BOP facility. With the projected load and revenue from the proposed BOP facility, AEP has indicated that the connection to the handoff point for the secure perimeter would be provided at no cost to the BOP. The service would be provided via overhead lines directly to the handoff point to the proposed BOP facility with no on-site facilities needed. If underground connections (conduit) are required for service to the proposed BOP facility, the cost of the conduit and running of lines would be the responsibility of the BOP and would be calculated as part of the site development costs. Telecommunications: Birch Communications, the telecommunications company serving the area, has the capability to meet the minimum requirements of the proposed BOP facility. There is a remote 6 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report terminal located in close proximity. However approximately 2 miles of fiber optic cables and 4 miles of copper cables would be required to bring service to the edge of the property. At this time, it should be assumed that the costs to install these cables would be the responsibility of BOP. However, during the design phase, Birch Communications should be contacted to discuss potential cost-sharing options. Opinion of Probable Costs: The costs to provide adequate utility service to the Roxana/Meade Farm site are presented in Table 4-2. The estimates are based on the information provided through the utility provider interviews and based on the engineering reports listed in Section 2. These costs are intended as an indicator of the general order of magnitude for the activities outlined. These costs should be used for site cost comparison purposes only. More detailed studies will be required to identify all factors associated with the actual costs required for extending the utility infrastructure and making the connections. Table 4-2 – Roxana/Meade Farm Utility Service Opinion of Probable Cost Cost Utility Water Sanitary Sewer Items Included Costs associated with bringing water to the site will be associated with installation of on-site infrastructure - TBD during design - Natural Gas Electrical Telecommunications - Gravity Main Force Main Manholes Lift Station(s) 15% Construction Contingency 30% Design/Admin/ROW/Legal/ Permitting Meter and Tap (incl. connection fees) 1 BOP Others $0 $0 $1.4 million $1.4 million LWSD to provide May require some assistance from BOP (50% assumed) $110,000 Well Closure: $850,000 x 15 $0 $12,750,000 N/A (assumes no underground conduit required) Construction of Local Remote Terminal Installation of fiber optic cables Installation of copper cable Local electronics UTILITY CONNECTION FEES TOTAL $0 $0 $165,000 $0 $14,425,000 $1,400,000 $15,825,000 1. Fee responsibility breakdown assumes the utility provider would contribute the portion of the costs listed above. If conditions change, BOP could potentially be responsible for all or portions of the “Others” fees. 7 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Advantages: • Proposed site is relatively level • Water transmission main has already been brought to the site • LWSD already has plans underway to extend the wastewater collection system to the site • Sufficient capacity available to supply electric power to the site at no cost to BOP Disadvantages: • Multiple gas wells and lines on the property would need to be closed and abandoned and/or relocated off the site at the expense (costly) of BOP • Extension of the wastewater collection system would likely require some funding assistance from BOP • There is no telecommunication remote terminal in the vicinity of the proposed Roxana/Meade Farm site, requiring the construction of a new remote terminal A map of the existing utilities in the vicinity of the Roxana/Meade Farm site is included in Figure 4-1. 8 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Figure 4-1 - Existing Utilities at Roxana/Meade Farm Site 9 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report 4.2 Payne Gap The Payne Gap property is located east of Whitesburg along the south side of Highway 119, between Routes 805 and 23. The property has deep mines and would need to be excavated and filled in order to create a level surface for construction. This location offers the most direct access to major highways. The Site Investigation Trip memo (KCI 2010) recommended that the Payne Gap site be removed from consideration due to “significant concerns with its locations, past mining, and excavation.” However the BOP feels that the site should remain under consideration because of its accessibility and proximity to alternative utility suppliers not associated with the Roxana/Meade Farm site. Water Service: Public water would be provided to the Payne Gap site by the LWSD. As described previously, LWSD has recently been extending its service area. In addition to extending the service to Roxana, the service has already been extended along Highway 119, adjacent to the proposed Payne Gap property. An 8-inch diameter watermain is in the vicinity of the Payne Gap site, and the water pressure near the connection point is approximately 110 psi. This is more than adequate to meet the 80 psi pressure requirements of the BOP facilities. Currently, the system in the vicinity of Payne Gap is being upgraded to ensure the average and peak water demands at the new facilities would be met. As with the Roxana site, the costs to BOP to provide water to its facilities would be limited to tapping the existing watermain and installing the necessary on-site water distribution infrastructure. All other water system upgrades are being provided by LWSD. Sanitary Sewer Service: Sanitary sewer services would be provided by the City of Jenkins and handled at the Jenkins WWTP. The nearest connection point to the Payne Gap site is located in close proximity to the Gateway Industrial Park in Jenkins. The connection point is an 8-inch gravity line, which would provide sufficient capacity for the estimated flow from the proposed BOP federal correctional facility. In order to reach the proposed connection point, construction of a lift station would be required. According to City officials and their representative engineering firm, Nesbitt Engineering, the WWTP has sufficient capacity to handle the proposed volume from the proposed BOP Facility. The City of Jenkins intends to provide construction of the sanitary sewer services to the proposed BOP facility at no cost to the BOP. Natural Gas: There is one gas well on-site, as well as a transmission line running directly through the property. The transmission line is a 16-inch high pressure main, owned and operated by EQT. The well is also owned and operated by EQT. The cost to relocate the gas line would be approximately $455 per linear foot (lf) and there would be a fee of approximately $110,000 for the connection and installation of a meter. Due to its proximity to the Jefferson National Forest, it would be necessary to reroute the new transmission line to the north and along Highway 119. This would require approximately 9,000 feet of a new pressure main. It is anticipated that it would take a minimum of two years to design, permit, and install this pressure main. In addition to the transmission line relocation, the EQT well would need to be abandoned and plugged. This would require an additional investment of approximately $850,000 from the BOP. Electric Power: As indicated previously, AEP has sufficient capacity in the immediate vicinity to supply power to the proposed facility. With the projected load and revenue from the BOP facility, AEP has indicated that the connection to the handoff point for the secure perimeter would be provided at no cost to the BOP. The service would be provided via overhead lines directly to the handoff point to the secure facility with no on-site facilities needed. If underground connections (conduit) are required for service to 10 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report the proposed BOP facility, the cost of the conduit and running of lines would be the responsibility of the BOP and would be considered part of the site development costs. Telecommunications: Windstream, the telecommunications company serving the area, has the capability to meet the minimum requirements of the proposed BOP facility. However, the connection to the existing infrastructure would be the responsibility of BOP. This would include the connection to the fiber cables at a splice location adjacent to the site and the connection to the copper cables at the Gateway Industrial Park in Jenkins. Opinion of Probable Costs: The costs to provide adequate utility service to the Payne Gap site are presented in Table 4-3. The estimates are based on the information provided through the utility provider interviews and based on the engineering reports listed in Section 2. These costs are intended as an indicator of the general order of magnitude for the activities outlined. These costs should be used for site cost comparison purposes only. More detailed studies will be required to identify all factors associated with the actual costs required for extending the utility infrastructure and making the connections. Table 4-3 – Payne Gap Utility Service Opinion of Probable Cost Cost Utility Water Sanitary Sewer Items Included Costs associated with bringing water to the site will be associated with installation of on-site infrastructure - TBD during design - Gravity Main / Force Main - Manholes - Lift Station(s) - 15% Construction Contingency - 30% Design/Admin/ROW/Legal/ Permitting Meter and Tap (incl. connection fees) Natural Gas Telecommunications Others $0 $0 $0 $3.8 million [City of Jenkins] $110,000 16-inch main relocation (9,000 ft @ $455/lf) Well closure Electrical 1 BOP $0 $4,100,000 $850,000 N/A (assumes no underground conduit required) Installation of fiber optic cables Installation of copper cables UTILITY CONNECTION FEES $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $5,095,000 $3,800,000 TOTAL $8,895,000 1. Fee responsibility breakdown assumes the utility provider would contribute the portion of the costs listed above. If conditions change, BOP could potentially be responsible for all or portions of the “Others” fees. 11 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Advantages: • Water service has already been extended to the site with adequate pressure and modifications to the water supply are currently underway to meet the estimated BOP water demand • The City of Jenkins to provide a connection to the existing sanitary sewer collection system at no cost to BOP • Sufficient capacity available to supply electric power to the site at no cost to BOP • Existing telecommunications service is adequate to meet minimum requirements of the proposed BOP facility, with minimal distance to the connection location Disadvantages: • Excavation and fill required to level property • The existing 16-inch natural gas transmission line currently running through the proposed site would need to be relocated at the expense of BOP. Although the current pipeline is approximately 4,000 feet, it would require more than twice that distance to reroute the transmission line around the property. It would require at least two years to design, permit and construct the new line. • There are two EQT gas wells on site that need to be relocated A map of the existing utilities in the vicinity of the Payne Gap site is included in Figure 4-2. 12 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Figure 4-2 - Existing Utilities at Payne Gap Site Copper connection location Gateway Industrial Park Fiber splice location 13 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report 5.0 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY Part of Executive Order 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, requires Federal agencies to increase energy efficiency, conserve water, reduce waste, support sustainable communities, and leverage Federal purchasing power to promote environmentally responsible products and technologies. This reduction of demand from the natural environment and load back to the natural environment would benefit not only the local community, but also the proposed BOP federal correctional facility itself by reducing operating costs. Without a detailed design for the proposed BOP facility, specific alternative energy designs and sustainability practices consistent with a new facility are difficult to identify at this time. However, some general practices aimed at the implementation of alternative energy sources and sustainability goals are discussed in this section, along with limitations associated with the sites. It is unlikely that the feasibility of specific practices would vary at the different proposed BOP facility sites that have been assessed. The viability and limitations are primarily associated with the entire region and any space constraints, which are comparable at both sites. 5.1 Alternative Energy Use of alternate or renewable sources of energy supports the Executive Order 13514 initiative by utilizing energy generated from natural resources that can be replenished naturally, without depleting the source. The two most widely recognized sources of renewable energy are related to solar and wind power. However, there are other sources of renewable energy such as biomass energy and geothermal systems that are gaining in popularity. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is focused on the advancement of our nation’s energy goals, through the research and development of renewable energy and implementation of energy efficient systems. Through their research, NREL has performed numerous studies on the efficacy of different types of renewable energy sources. This section provides a discussion on available renewable energy sources, as well as the results of NREL’s research on their effectiveness in various parts of the country, and an assessment of potential use at the proposed BOP facility. The renewable energy sources discussed in this assessment include: • • • • Wind Energy Photovoltaics/Solar Power Geothermal Systems Biomass Energy 14 BOP – Letcher County 5.1.1 **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Wind Energy Wind energy is harnessed through catching naturally occurring wind with wind turbines and converting the wind’s energy into electricity. Turbines are typically installed on towers over 100 feet tall in order to harness higher wind speeds. Wind turbines can be installed individually, or in large groups, depending on their intended application, which can range from supplementing small portions of a facility’s energy consumption to providing the primary source of electricity. In order for wind turbines to harness and convert wind into electricity there needs to be a consistent and sufficient amount of wind. NREL, in coordination with the Department of Energy’s Wind Program, published a wind resource map for the state of Kentucky. The wind resource map shows the predicted mean annual wind speeds at an 80-meter (m) [262.5-ft] height. Areas with annual average wind speeds of 6.5 meters per second and greater at an 80-m height are generally considered to be suitable for wind development. Figure 5-1 shows the wind resource potential at 80-m heights for Kentucky. Figure 5-1 - Kentucky Wind Map Letcher County Source: NREL. Kentucky – Annual Average Wind Speed at 80 m. October 2010. http://apps.eere.energy.gov/wind/ windexchange/pdfs/wind.maps/ky_80m.pdf Letcher County’s average annual wind speed falls below the 5.0 meters per second at the 80-m height. While the map is a nationally produced map and specific localized data was not gathered, it is generally accepted that wind power is an unlikely source for alternative energy for this part of the country. 15 BOP – Letcher County 5.1.2 **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Photovoltaics Solar power is an ever developing trend, with advances in the industry occurring regularly. Photovoltaics (PV) use semiconductor materials to convert sunlight energy into electricity. There are several types of collectors available for collecting the sun’s rays in different ways; some collect only direct rays and others collect both direct rays and reflected light. NREL has published a map of photovoltaic solar resources across the country. As seen in Figure 5-2, eastern Kentucky lies in a more moderate solar resource region. This does not necessarily indicate that PV is not a viable option for the new facility. There are a number of effective PV systems being utilized throughout the state of Kentucky. Figure 5-2 - Photovoltaic Solar Resource of the U.S. Source: NREL. Photovoltaic Solar Resource of the United States. September 2012. http://www.nrel.gov/ gis/images/eere_pv/national_photovoltaic_2012-01.jpg In discussion with a representative of the Kentucky Solar Partnership, solar power in eastern Kentucky can be a feasible option for supplementing power supply. While the energy generated from the solar panels would probably not be cost effective for the entire proposed BOP facility, solar panels could easily be utilized for providing power to the hot water tanks and smaller, energy-hungry appliances that would be utilized at the proposed BOP facility. Additionally, there are incentives and net metering alternatives to help reduce the demand from the energy provider. Therefore, it is recommended that PV systems be further investigated during the design of the new facility as a supplemental source of power. 16 BOP – Letcher County 5.1.3 **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Geothermal Systems Geothermal systems use the temperature of the earth to heat and cool buildings. By installing a series of looped pipes deep into the ground, and pumping fluid through the system of pipes, geothermal systems utilize the relatively constant temperature of the earth to absorb and transfer heat to or from a building. Typically, the upper 10 feet of the Earth’s surface maintains a temperature of between 50° and 60°F (10° and 16°C). Geothermal heat pump systems include the system of pipes, a heat pump, and an air duct system. In the winter, the system pumps the heat into the buildings and in the summer the process is reversed to remove the heat from the building. NREL has published a map of known hydrothermal sites and areas most conducive to the installation of geothermal systems. As seen in Figure 5-3, most geothermal reservoirs of hot water are located in the western states, as are the most favorable conditions for geothermal systems. Although Eastern Kentucky is located in a “Least Favorable” zone, it does not preclude the BOP from implementing a supplemental geothermal system at the proposed correctional facility. These systems are relatively inexpensive to install and maintain, and are available in a wide range of capacities. This type of system would not be viable for providing all the heating and cooling needs of the proposed BOP facility, but such a system could supplement the building’s heating and cooling needs and should be considered during the design of the facility. Figure 5-3 - Geothermal Resource of the U.S. Source: NREL. Geothermal Resource of the United States. Oct. 2009. http://www.nrel.gov/gis/images/geothermal_ resource2009-final.jpg 17 BOP – Letcher County 5.1.4 **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report Biomass Energy Biomass energy is the conversion of plant matter into either electricity or liquid or gaseous fuels. Common sources of biomass are grasses, agricultural crops, and forestry residues. The viability of using biomass energy as an alternative energy source is typically associated with the proximity of the source (plant material) to the point of use. NREL has published a map estimating the range of biomass resources available throughout the country. As seen below in Figure 5-4, the resources available in eastern Kentucky are minimal. Figure 5-4 - Biomass Resources Available in the U.S. Source: NREL. Biomass Resources of the United States. Sep. 2009. http://www.nrel.gov/gis/images/map_biomass_ total_us_new.jpg Although the map does not indicate that Kentucky has a wide supply of resources available to support a biomass energy system, a small system to supplement an existing gas supply system could be plausible, if there is a source within close proximity of the selected site. This option could be considered further during the design of the proposed BOP facility as a supplemental power source. 18 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report 5.2 Sustainability The concept of sustainability is often considered synonymous with environmental stewardship. Although green practices are integral to sustainability, the broader principle of sustainability implements the concept that development that meets the needs of the present should not compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The concept of the “triple bottom line” (TBL) states that success is measured not only by financial performance, but by balanced achievements in environmental stewardship, economic growth and social responsibility. The TBL is achieved when an integrated solution is found that simultaneously achieves excellence in these components, as opposed to finding tradeoffs among these areas. The Environmental Stewardship component of the TBL focuses on practices such as reducing waste, minimizing carbon and water footprints, preventing pollution and conserving natural resources. However, to be truly “sustainable” as opposed to just “green,” it is important to also incorporate economic growth and social responsibility practices. Economic growth concepts focus on practices such as the use of local contractors and supplies, and creating and strengthening markets such as alternative energy. Social responsibility concepts focus on practices such as implementing fair labor practices or educating surrounding communities. To implement these concepts of sustainability with respect to the construction of a new BOP federal correctional facility, there are some components that should be focused on during design and construction. Other practices can be implemented after facility construction and maintained as part of the facility’s standard operating procedures. During construction, recycled building materials should be utilized when available. Also, materials and labor should be selected from local vendors and suppliers, as applicable. As BOP begins to operate the facility, participation in programs promoting waste reduction, recycling, reuse and composting should be coordinated with the local Public Works and Public Health organizations. Some sustainability concepts that could be implemented with respect to reducing utility demands at the new site include: 1. Gray Water Disposal - The Letcher County Environmental Health Department indicated that there is availability to utilize gray water disposals for a portion of the sanitary sewer load. The gray water beds would be connected to the washing machine outfall only and could significantly reduce the amount of flow to the Whitesburg WWTP. 2. Water Reduction – To reduce the water demand at the new facility, the installation of water saving appliances such as low-flow toilets and high-efficiency clothes washers should be considered. Other considerations should be given when selecting landscaping alternatives. Xeriscaping refers to the selection of plants based on their drought tolerance and their ability to thrive without regular maintenance. Xeriscapes offer a viable alternative for attractive exterior space planning without consuming dwindling water resources and creating excessive cuttings or plant waste. 3. Green Roof - The inclusion of a “green” roof on top of the facility has the potential to improve the energy efficiency of the building by providing additional insulation and reducing electricity costs. Additionally, green roofs protect the roof membrane, which can result in a longer roof lifespan. 19 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report 6.0 CONCLUSIONS The purpose of this Enhanced Utility Investigation Report was to assess the viability of providing utilities to the Roxana and Payne Gap sites for the proposed BOP federal correctional facility. Since many of the factors associated with the site work necessary to install the utility infrastructure are comparable at both sites, this comparison focuses on the cost to the BOP for bringing the utility connections to the edge of the properties. Potable water service has already been (or in the process of being) extended to both sites and the LWSD and the City of Jenkins are both amenable to providing wastewater collection lines to both sites. While the intention is to extend wastewater collection service to the sites at no cost to the BOP, it is likely that the Roxana site would require some cost sharing by BOP. Electric and telecommunications services are both readily available at both potential sites with some system extension and connection fees required for telecommunications services. The one utility with significant impact on the costs associated with site development is natural gas. BOP does not want any wells or gas lines located on their property and therefore the construction of a new facility would require abandoning and closing a number of natural gas wells at Roxana or relocating an existing gas line around the property line at Payne Gap. The costs associated with these factors are significant and represent the primary utility cost difference associated with site selection. As seen in Table 6-1, the estimated cost to BOP for the connection at the Payne Gap site is significantly lower than the costs associated with Roxana. However, the relocation of the existing gas line will take approximately two years compared to the six months required to abandon the wells at Roxana. Table 6-1 – Utility Connection - Probable Cost Comparison The two important factors associated with bringing utilities to the sites Location include cost to BOP and the time Roxana/Meade Farm associated with constructing the Payne Gap infrastructure necessary to make the connections to the various services. As discussed previously the costs and time associated with bringing all of the utilities, with the exception of natural gas, to the site are relatively comparable. The exception would be if BOP is required to provide some cost sharing for the extension of the wastewater collection system to Roxana. This could require approximately $1.4 million in BOP funding. The primary difference in cost is the natural gas modifications. As depicted in Table 6.1, the Roxana well closures are much more costly than the Payne Gap gas line relocation. However, with respect to time requirements, the relocation would require at least two years, while abandoning the wells would take about six months. These are the two key factors associated with the utilities that need to be considered during site selection. Utility Connection Costs (in millions) BOP Others TOTAL $14.4 $1.4 $15.8 $5.1 $3.8 $8.9 After site selection is finalized, the BOP would have the opportunity to assess their options for implementing alternate energy systems and sustainability practices. These options and opportunities would need to be assessed in more detail during the design and operation and maintenance phases of this project. Although, it is not practical to install an alternative energy system to power the proposed BOP facility in its entirety, there are numerous systems that could potentially supplement the power provided to the site, and should be considered. Additionally, sustainability practices should be planned and coordinated with the local regulators to allow BOP to meet the goals set forth in Executive Order 13514 to increase energy efficiency, conserve water, reduce waste, and promote environmentally responsible products and technologies. 20 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report APPENDIX 1 – FIELD PHOTOGRAPHS [Includes pictures at all identified sites prior to eliminating non-viable locations] 21 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Enhanced Utility Investigation Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 22 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report Photo #1 – Entrance Drive to Roxana Site Photo #2 – Roxana Field 23 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report Photo #3 – Roxana Field looking West Photo #4 – Buildings on Roxana Site 24 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report Photo #5 – Edge of Roxana Plateau Photo #6 – Overview of Roxana Property 25 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report Photo #7 – Cell Tower on Van Fields Property Photo #8 – Van Fields plateau 26 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report Photo #9 – Van Fields property looking northeast Photo #10 – View of lower field at Van Fields 27 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report Photo #11 – Meadow Branch Entrance Drive Photo #12 – Meadow Branch logging road 28 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report Photo #13 – Results of logging activity at Meadow Branch Photo #14 – Logging Truck leaving Meadow Branch site 29 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report Photo #15 – Entrance drive to Payne Gap in heavy rain Photo #16 – Entrance drive to Payne Gap in heavy rain 30 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report APPENDIX 2 – SITE INVESTIGATION UTILITY MEETINGS MEMO 31 BOP – Letcher County **DRAFT** Utility Investigation Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 32 Memo To: File From: Curtis Lipsey Cc: Deborah Henson Date: May 9, 2011 Re: BOP – Letcher County Utility investigation This memo covers the Utility Investigation Meetings held in Whitesburg Kentucky, week of May 2 – May 5. The utility investigation is one phase of the feasibility study for the four locations identified during the Reconnaissance Report by Louis Berger in 2008. The four sites identified are: 1. Roxana / Meade farm (ROX) 2. Van / Fields (VF) 3. Payne Gap (PG) 4. Meadow Branch (MB) Attendees: The following personnel were present at each of the site visits and utility meetings: • • • • • • • Elwood Cornett – Letcher Co. Planning Commission (LCPC) Jim Jones – LCPC consultant Bridgettte Lyles – Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Parke Ransom – BOP Shaym Sharma – BOP Deborah Henson – TEC Inc. Curtis Lipsey – TEC Inc. Site Visits: Site visits to the four potential sites were conducted on Tuesday, May 3, 2011. In addition to the above listed attendees, Jim Ward - County Judge / Executive and Joe DePriest – LCPC. The field visit to the Payne Gap site was conducted from inside the vehicles due to heavy rains; a short site walk was conducted at the remainder of the three sites. Utility Meetings: The memo is divided into the discussions held for each utility type and provides a brief overview of the capacities, responsibilities, availability, and preliminary cost assumptions. Each meeting was attended by Mr. Elwood Cornett and Mr. Jim Jones, whom also provided input during several of the meetings. WATER/SEWER: Meeting Attendees: Attendee ROX VF PG MB Date W/S W/S W 5-4 S 5-5 W/S 5-2 Jim Ward – County Judge / Executive Benny Hamilton – KRADD Jamie Noe – Bell Engineering Director of Letcher Co Water / Sewer Matt Curtis – Nesbitt Engineering Mayor G.C. Kinder – City of Jenkins Todd DePriest – City of Jenkins Kevin Howard - Summit Engineering W/S W/S W/S W/S Brett Fisher – Summit Engineering Mayor James Wylie – Whitesburg • • • • • • • • • • MB will be served by the Town of Pound VA, whom was unreachable for the meetings. Judge Ward and the Director of Letcher Co Water and Sewer stated several times that water and sewer service would be extended to ROX/VF/PG at no cost to the BOP if one of those sites was selected. ROX: Existing water lines are located within 5 miles of the site. VF: Existing water lines are located adjacent to the site. ROX/VF/PG: Regardless of whether the BOP facility is established, Letcher County is planning on upgrading and connecting the county’s water system with neighboring counties and utility providers for consistency of service. ROX/VF/PG: Bell Engineering will perform an engineering estimate based on the estimated elevation of the facility to determine location and quantity of booster pumps to service the facility and elevated storage tanks. ROX/VF/PG: Bell Engineering to provide pdf maps of proposed county water systems. ROX/VF/PG: Upgrades of nearby tanks and lines may be required in order to provide service to the facility during times the elevated storage tank is off line for maintenance. ROX: Sanitary Sewer is located approximately 9 miles of the site entrance by the Parkway Inn. VF: Sanitary sewer is located approximately 2.5 miles from the site entrance by the Parkway Inn. • • • • • • • ROX: The Whitesburg WWTP is located approximately 10 miles from the site entrance. VF: The Whitesburg WWTP is located approximately 4 miles from the site entrance. ROX / VF: The Whitesburg WWTP was recently upgraded, partly in anticipation of the BOP project, to handle 630,000 gpd and is currently receiving approximately half of the capacity. The plant was designed to be upgraded with additional modules to nearly 1,000,000 gpd. ROX / VF: The County is considering providing a dedicated sanitary line and system for the facility. Letcher County would prefer to know which site is preferred so they could focus their effort towards that location. The county does not have commercial rates, only residential, the connection fees are minimal and may be waived for the project. Mayor Wylie reiterated the planning commissions and Judge wards sentiments regarding provision of service to the selected site. LETCHER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Attendees: • • • • • • • Attendee ROX VF PG MB Date Kevin Nichols – Letcher Co Health X X X X 5-3 On-site wells for water service are no longer a feasible option in Letcher Co. On-site sewer disposal (underground leech fields) would be significant in construction and cost. Basic calculations performed by Kevin Nichols resulted in the following numbers: o 210,000 gal tank o 41,800 lf – 12-ft wide chamber beds o Based on 1400 bed facility On-site WWTP would be permitted through the State Division of Water, Letcher Co representative located in Hazard, KY – Damon White. On-site WWTP would require discharge to a blue line stream – def.: water running in stream all year long. State Division of Water also responsible for spray irrigation option, common in Kentucky. Graywater beds for washing machine discharge – 28,340 lf of 2-ft wide by 2-ft deep beds. o Cross section of bed – 6-in stone / 4-in pipe / 6-in stone / 4-inch straw / topsoil NATURAL GAS SERVICE Attendees: Attendee ROX VF PG MB Date Don Goble – Troublesome Creek (TC) X 5-4 Jed Weinberg – Clean Gas Inc.(CG) X 5-5 Maurice Royster – EQT X X X X 5-5 Darryl Smith – EQT • Each representative stated that most gas contracts regarding the wells and transmission lines have a clause that the gas company will relocate the transmission lines one time at no cost to the property owner. As long as the move is a property development action. Each representative was checking into the applicable properties for clarification. • ROX: In addition to Troublesome Creek and Clean Gas, Kinzer Drilling (KD) also owns wells within the site. Kinzer has since been contacted and a conference call is being established. • ROX: There are several wells (TC/CG/KD) and underground lines within the proposed site location. These wells would be located within the property of the future BOP facility and would either need to be capped and abandoned (at a cost) or agreements with the BOP made to continue operation. The lines will have to be adjusted to avoid the BOP facilities. • VF: EQT has one gas well shown on the mining report map by Summit Engineering. EQT is preparing a cost estimate to abandon the well, including compensation for the well. TC has several wells located just outside of the proposed BOP property limits as estimated by Summit Engineering. • PG: There are no wells located within the proposed property limits of the BOP facility. • PG: EQT has a 16-inch gas main located through the center of the site that will need to be relocated. EQT is researching cost to relocate the gas main as well as legal responsibility. • MG: EQT has a 4-inch gas line running through the proposed site location that will need to be relocated. EQT is researching cost to relocate the gas main as well as legal responsibility. • MB: According to the Mining Report map produced by Summit Engineering, There are three wells by Columbia Natural Resources Inc./Triana Energy (CNR) within the proposed property limits. CNR has been contacted and we are waiting on return calls. • According to Don Goble (TC) a small building for monitoring equipment would be located on-site near the meter and tap. • TC gas wells and transmission lines (4-in) carry 1.23 BTU, zero to low sulfur, and can be routed directly into facility with no treatment processes. • The wells in the ROX area have an estimated 20-25 year life. • Approximate cost to abandon wells - $40,000 construction and $60,000-$80,000 compensation for lost revenues. • CG: Jed Weinberg will pull comparable costs to the wells in the ROX site for cost estimating of abandoning the wells. Typical costs could run between $300,000 and $1,000,000 per well. ELECTRICITY Attendees: Attendee ROX VF PG Mark Abner – Cumberland Valley Elec. (CVE) MB Date X 5-4 Mike Laslo – Appalachia Electric (AEP) X X X 5-5 Mike L. – AEP X X X 5-5 • MB: New transmission lines (69-kV) would need to be run to site. o Approx. 2-year construction time o Temporary service could be provided today. o Would locate a substation on site, 1-acre compound. o Sole Source to BOP facility o Would provide cable to master meter, up to BOP to provide conduit and connect facility to master meter. • ROX / VF / PG: • AEP: Has 12 kV line adjacent to PG site o No on-site facilities would be required. Has 34 kV line adjacent to ROX /VF sites. • ROX / VF / PG: Transmission lines would be run above ground • ROX / VF / PG: 2 month estimated bill deposit required. • AEP: Willing to give discounts for facility providing own “sustainable” power but would not buy back power. TELECOMMUNICATIONS Attendees: Attendee ROX VF PG MB Date Frank Dawahare – SouthEast Telephone (SE) X X X X 5-4 Roy Harlow – Intermountain Cable (IC) Kenny Samons – TVS Cable • X X X 5-5 X 5-5 SE: Provision of services to all four sites is not an issue. Service cost will depend on required bandwidth. o T-1 lines are easily run, cost depends on whether T-1 is constant / dynamic / symmetrical / bonded? o Depending on bandwidth, upgrades to system (signal boosters) may be required. Cost for installation shared amongst SE and BOP. o Concern with service is reliability of upload speed. • Roy Harlow @ intermountain Cable did not show for his meeting but called to apologize and stated we could work via phone and email. • TVS: Can easily service the VF/PG sites but has questionable service to the ROX site. o • PG site can be provided with fiber optic and coax. TVS – suggested checking with ATT for service to ROX site. Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX E-1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIS Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) E1-2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky DRAFT EIS COMMENT INDEX Commenter by Category Page Number Federal/State/Local Agencies US EPA Region 4 (Heinz Mueller) US Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary (Joyce Stanley) KY Department for Environmental Protection (Ronald Price) E1-9 to E1-28 E1-29 E1-30 to E1-32 Federal/State/Local Elected Officials Steven Beshear (Governor of Kentucky) City of Jenkins E1-33 E1-34 Organizations and Businesses Human Rights Defense Center Bereans for Michael Brown (Quentin Savage) Mountain Comprehensive Health Corporation (Mike Caudill) Palmer Engineering (Kevin Damron) Kentucky Highlands Investment Corporation (Jerry Rickett) E1-35 to E1-55 E1-56 E1-57 to E1-58 E1-59 E1-60 Individuals Robin Bowen-Watko (Whitesburg City Council) James Ison Nancy Fleming Annette Napier June Short Coleen Breeding Name Withheld Lori Pigman Name Withheld Connie Bates Kenneth Cornett Homer Pigman Name Withheld Toby Breeding Alex Williams Name Withheld David Clark (Appalachian Real Estate Group) Marlene Walters John Honeycutt Name Withheld Alecia Pratt Timothy Lewis James Fields Name Withheld Irene Thomas Jim McAuley (Letcher County Conservation District) Sue Grason Dixie Hall Name Withheld Name Withheld Maggie Watts Larry Hogg Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-61 E1-62 E1-63 E1-64 E1-65 E1-66 E1-67 E1-68 E1-69 E1-70 E1-71 E1-72 E1-73 E1-74 E1-75 E1-76 E1-77 E1-78 E1-79 E1-80 E1-81 E1-82 E1-83 E1-84 E1-85 E1-86 E1-87 E1-88 E1-89 E1-90 E1-91 E1-92 E1-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Commenter by Category Rita Pratt (Whitaker Bank, Inc.) Freddie Bowling (Jenkins Independent Schools, Superintendent) Name Withheld Name Withheld Name Withheld David Narramore (Letcher Co. Tourism) Lisa Narramore Name Withheld (Jenkins Independent Schools) Name Withheld (Jenkins Independent Schools) Name Withheld (Jenkins Independent Schools) Name Withheld (Jenkins Independent Schools) Bennie McCall (City of Jenkins, City Administrator) Danny Ingram (Hazard Community and Technical College) Bonell Watts Tyler Smith Name Withheld Name Withheld Lovell Sexton Name Withheld Name Withheld Earlene William (Whitesburg City Council) Dauphus Day Name Withheld Tim and Carol Breeding James Fields (Little Zion Baptist Church, Pastor) John Reedy Name Withheld (Letcher County Public Schools) Bob Banks Terry Adams (County Magistrate) Name Withheld (Whitesburg Appalachian Regional Hospital) Roland Brown Brenda Day Gary Pratt Delena Miller Michelle Griffin (MCHC) Holly Caudill Juanita Collier Spangler (Letcher County Teachers Organization) Dwight Brockley (Whitesburg ARH) Nancy Campbell Name Withheld (Letcher County Board of Education) Shane Lyle (GRW) Mitchell Wright (Mitchell Wright Recycling) John Cain II Donald Wright Randi McCall Paul Fleming Name Withheld Melinda Whitaker Delana Banks James Kincaid Lee Caudill (Mountain Comprehensive Health Corporation) E1-4 Page Number E1-93 E1-94 E1-95 E1-96 E1-97 E1-98 E1-99 E1-100 E1-101 E1-102 E1-103 E1-104 E1-105 E1-106 E1-107 E1-108 E1-109 E1-110 E1-111 E1-112 E1-113 E1-114 E1-115 E1-116 E1-117 E1-118 E1-119 E1-120 E1-121 E1-122 E1-123 E1-124 E1-125 E1-126 E1-127 E1-128 E1-128 E1-130 E1-131 E1-132 E1-133 E1-134 E1-135 E1-136 E1-137 E1-138 E1-139 E1-140 E1-141 E1-142 E1-143 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Commenter by Category Robert Holcomb Mary Ann Whitaker Richard Whitaker Ricky Whitaker Stacie Collie Name Withheld (Lewis Electric Security Systems) Brad Collie Robin Kincer Charles Sexton (Charles Sexton Trucking Inc.) Elizabeth Jones Name Withheld (Letcher County Chamber of Commerce) Mary Ruth Wright Stacy Isaac (Letcher County Schools) Carol Ison (Cowan Community Action Group, Inc.) James Perry (FBOP USP Lee) Doug Adams Name Withheld Sherie Caudill (WARH) Hettie Adams (Letcher County Fiscal Court) Cristine Bolling (Letcher County Fiscal Court) Rhonda Perry Doris Frazier (Letcher County Fiscal Court) Robert Meade (Kings Creek Volunteer Fire Department, Chief) Crystal Hart Name Withheld Name Withheld Leigh Blankenbeckley (Whitaker Bank) Wendy Bentley (Community Trust Bank) Randy Bailey (Letcher County Soil Conservation Supervisor) Brenda Blair Tara Damron Name Withheld Name Withheld (Kentucky Works Program/Big Sandy Area Development District) Name Withheld Charles Frazier (Tom Short Ford, General Manager) Abbetina Genty Name Withheld Name Withheld James Craft (City of Whitesburg, Mayor) Richard Lewis Melanie Watts Name Withheld Name Withheld (Letcher County Board of Education) Linda Watts Margaret Lewis Cathy Wright-Rose Name Withheld (Jenkins Independent School Board) Name Withheld Alita Vogel (Letcher County Public Library) Name Withheld (Letcher County Schools) Regina Brown (Letcher County Schools) Jolinda Wright Appendix E-1 March 2016 Page Number E1-144 E1-145 E1-146 E1-147 E1-148 E1-149 E1-150 E1-151 to E1-152 E1-153 to E1-154 E1-155 to E1-156 E1-157 to E1-158 E1-159 to E1-160 E1-161 to E1-162 E1-163 to E1-164 E1-165 to E1-166 E1-167 to E1-168 E1-169 to E1-170 E1-171 to E1-172 E1-173 to E1-174 E1-175 to E1-176 E1-177 to E1-178 E1-179 to E1-180 E1-181 to E1-182 E1-183 to E1-184 E1-185 to E1-186 E1-187 to E1-188 E1-189 to E1-190 E1-191 to E1-192 E1-193 to E1-194 E1-195 to E1-196 E1-197 to E1-198 E1-199 to E1-200 E1-201 to E1-202 E1-203 to E1-204 E1-205 to E1-206 E1-207 to E1-208 E1-209 to E1-210 E1-211 to E1-212 E1-213 to E1-214 E1-215 to E1-216 E1-217 to E1-218 E1-219 to E1-220 E1-221 to E1-222 E1-223 to E1-224 E1-225 to E1-226 E1-227 to E1-228 E1-229 to E1-230 E1-231 to E1-232 E1-233 to E1-234 E1-235 to E1-236 E1-237 to E1-238 E1-239 to E1-240 E1-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Commenter by Category Stephanie Cassell (Jenkins Middle High School) Name Withheld (Whitaker Bank) Name Withheld (Letcher County Schools) Kyle Smith (Knott County Water and Sewer) Richard Smith Marjorie Sparks Randy Campbell Sherwood and Rhoda Ison Larry Whitaker Name Withheld Howard Stanfill (Kentucky Farm Bureau) Melissa McFall (Napa Auto Works/Childers Tire and Supply) Cathy Ingran Shirley Breeding Kate Walters Ralph Cornett Teresa Fleming (MCHC) Name Withheld Sandy Creech Name Withheld Margaret Hammonds (Whitaker Bank Inc.) Robert Hares Kennith Watts Amelia Kirby Addie Raleigh Elizabeth Sanders James Craft Jimmie Farley Lisa Narramore Richard and Pat Yinger James Fields Carol and Louis Brown Ann Hall Charles Holbrook, Jr. Peggy Greer Maura Ubinger Noam Brown Scott Parkin T. Reed Miller Tanya Nguyen Willie Dodson Benjamin Reynoso George Ball Libby Gho Toby Fraser Panagioti Tsolkas Page Number E1-241 to E1-242 E1-243 to E1-244 E1-245 to E1-246 E1-247 to E1-248 E1-249 to E1-250 E1-251 to E1-252 E1-253 E1-254 E1-255 E1-256 E1-257 E1-258 E1-259 E1-260 E1-261 E1-262 E1-263 E1-264 E1-265 E1-266 E1-267 E1-268 E1-269 E1-270 E1-270 E1-271 to E1-272 E1-273 E1-274 E1-275 E1-276 E1-277 E1-278 to E1-279 E1-280 E1-281 to E1-282 E1-283 to E1-284 E1-285 E1-286 E1-287 E1-288 E1-289 E1-290 E1-291 E1-292 E1-293 E1-294 E1-295 to E1-296 Form Letters Form Letter 1 Form Letter 2 Form Letter 3 Form Letter 4 E1-6 E1-297 E1-298 E1-299 E1-300 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Commenter by Category Page Number Form Letter 5 Form Letter 6 Form Letter 7 Form Letter 8 E1-301 E1-302 E1-303 E1-304 Citizen Petitions – received 1,251 signatures E1-557 to E1-594 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-7 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) E1-8 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-9 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-10 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-11 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-12 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-13 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-14 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-15 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-16 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-17 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-18 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-19 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-20 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-21 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-22 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Preferred Alternative has been identified in Section 1. The2.9Preferred Alternative is identified in Section 2.6 of of this FINAL EIS. Revised 2.theThe BureauFinal thanksEIS. you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. 3.Time schedules for the proposed project have not yet The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and been Detailed project schedules will only be hasestablished. noted your comment. a Record of Decision been 4.determined The Bureauif/when thanks you for reviewing the Draft has EIS and has noted your comment. funds required for the project issued and appropriated 5.have Thebeen Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and made available. has noted your comment. Bureauthanks thanks you the Draft EIS and 3. 6.TheThe Bureau youfor forreviewing reviewing the Draft EIS and notedyour your comment. comment. hashas noted 7. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and 1 4. Thehas Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and noted your comment. 8.hasThe Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and noted your comment. 2 5. 9.TheThe Bureau youfor forreviewing reviewing the Draft EIS and Bureauthanks thanks you the Draft EIS and notedyour your comment. comment. hashas noted has noted your comment. 3 4 5 6 6. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 7. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 8. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 7 8 9 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-23 10. Th 2. 11. Th ha 12. Th ha 13. Th ha 14. Th ha 15. Th ha 16. Th ha 17. Th ha 18. Th ha Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 9. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 9 10 E1-24 10. See response No. 1 above and Table ES-1 of the Executive Summary. The Preferred Alternative has been identified in the Revised Final EIS as the Roxana site. The Bureau has conducted coordination with the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to outline minimization measures and develop appropriate mitigation for impacts that cannot be avoided. Chapters 4 and 5 discuss anticipated impacts, agency coordination, and proposed mitigation measures. Appendix A contains agency correspondence. Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-25 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-26 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-27 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-28 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-29 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-30 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-31 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4. These BMPs have been added to the Air Quality sections of the Revised Final EIS. 4 E1-32 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-33 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3 E1-34 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-35 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, the Bureau has evaluated a reasonable number of alternatives based on the project needs. The National Environmental Policy Act and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) do not specify the extent of the alternatives to be evaluated, just that a reasonable number of alternatives are evaluated. CEQ guidance specifically states "What constitutes a reasonable number of alternatives depends on the nature of the proposal and the facts in each case.” Chapter 2 discusses the alternatives development process for the project. 1 E1-36 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau is responsible for housing inmates sentenced by the federal court system. The Bureau is not the agency responsible for developing sentencing guidelines or alternatives to current sentencing guidelines. 2 3. Placement of an inmate depends on numerous factors as outlined in the Bureau’s Program Statement 5100.08. Attempting to locate the inmate within the region of origin provides greater opportunity for visitation with family, which aids in the rehabilitation process. 3 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-37 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4. Public involvement, from the scoping phase and throughout the EIS process for the proposed action, has been extensive, ongoing, and in full compliance with NEPA requirements. Section 1.7.4 of the Revised Final EIS details public involvement activities that occurred for the project. 3 4 E1-38 The public scoping process was used to assist the Bureau in identifying the relevant environmental issues to be included and considered in the Draft EIS. Unlike comments on the Draft EIS, scoping comments are not published or responded to, but rather are summarized and the summary included in the EIS (in Section 1.7.4). A substantial number of public comments on the Draft EIS were received (more than 1,160, not including petitions) reflective of a robust public involvement program. Appendix E-1 contains these public comments and the Bureau’s responses to these comments. Comments submitted on the Final EIS, although withdrawn and replaced by this Revised Final EIS, are part of the Administrative Record for the proposed action and are included in Appendix E-2. Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 4 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-39 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 5. No impacts to the health and safety of persons (inmates, staff, visitors, or contractors) are anticipated as a result of the project or past mining activities on the proposed site. Additional investigation was undertaken to ensure there would be no environmental impacts on site that would have bearing on human health. See response to comment #6. 4 5 E1-40 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 6. Regarding concerns about health hazards from the former 6 mining sites, the Roxana site, the preferred alternative, was investigated to determine whether the excavation and onsite redistribution of the overburden from the former surface coal mine would be likely to induce material environmental impacts on the site and/or to streams receiving drainage from the site that could have significant bearing on human health due to the geochemical nature of the material. The investigation tested existing water discharges around the perimeter of the reclaimed mine site. The results of these tests indicate the drainage is essentially devoid of heavy metal or trace metal components. The investigation also included subsurface sampling of the overburden material. The analysis of 45 samples from six deep borings within the area where construction is proposed found that the rubble material exhibits very low potential to generate acidic drainage, as it is well-weathered material very low in sulfur content and of low reactivity geochemically. Based on the water analyses and the results of the subsurface material tests, there are no areas of overburden that require special handling, and there is very low potential for mobilization of metals of any concern to either human health or aquatic environments on the Roxana site. Appendix H contains the investigation report, and Section 5.10 of the EIS includes a detailed discussion of the results of the investigation. Regarding concerns about prisons located near other coalrelated processing facilities, the Roxana site is located over a mile away from a coal processing site and thus should not be compared to the conditions cited in Dustin McDaniels report, as referenced in the comment letter, regarding Fayette where the prison is immediately adjacent to the coal processing and combustion waste disposal facility. No combustion or disposal of coal ash or other combustion Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-41 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky byproducts occurs at the coal processing site, and the washed ore is trucked off-site to generation plants located elsewhere. Refer to Section 5.12.1.2 of the EIS for further information. 6 The site investigation conducted in 2010 by KCI, referred to in the comment, was a desktop and site walkover study. No detailed studies were conducted. Based on the 2010 memo, the Bureau decided to study how previous mining activity may have impacted the site and if the site could be developed. In 2012, a feasibility study was conducted along with geotechnical studies to determine if the site could be developed. Based on these studies, it was determined that with significant excavation and fill activities, the site could be developed; therefore, it was carried into the EIS for further evaluation. Excavation and grading studies determined that significant earthwork would have to occur to make the site developable. Studies, including geotechnical, were conducted to determine the extent of excavation and grading activities to prepare the site for development. The recommendation that the Payne Gap site be removed from further consideration was based on the need for excessive excavation that would incur additional costs and was not related to health-related concerns from past mining. E1-42 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 7. Sections 4.8.1.1 and 4.8.2.1, and Sections 5.8.1.1 and 5.8.2.1 of the Revised Final EIS address the quality and availability of potable water at the Payne Gap and Roxana sites, respectively. 6 Regarding potential impacts on water quality associated with the gas wells on the Roxana site, as stated in Section 5.10.2.3, testing of water discharge samples from the site reveal that there is no significant or detectable impact from deep saline waters that may have been encountered with installation of the gas wells at the site. Therefore, their closure would ensure that no such impact is likely to occur in the future. 7 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-43 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 8. Facilities intended for human occupancy would be designed to prevent occupant exposures to radon above the USEPA action level of 4 pCi/L. Information about radon and potential for occupant exposure has been added to Sections 4.12 and 5.12 in the Revised Final EIS. 7 8 9 9. Environmental Justice guidance (Executive Order 12898) directs federal agencies to address “disproportionately high and adverse” human health or environmental effects of its actions upon minority and low income populations. Inmates to be incarcerated at the proposed facility would include a population of mixed backgrounds (differing in many respects, including ethnicity, race, income, age, and education). The Bureau is not aware of any provision in guidance to federal agencies for implementation of EO 12898 that identifies inmates, or such a diverse population, as either a low income or minority population for purposes of the Executive Order. However, even assuming inmates to be housed at the proposed USP and FPC were such a population, the Bureau has determined that neither disproportionately high nor adverse human health or environmental impacts to the inmates would result from the proposed facility. A UNICOR operation at this facility is no longer included as part of the proposed action. If UNICOR does operate at this location in the future, all applicable environmental laws and regulations will be adhered to and enforced. E1-44 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 9 10. The proposed facilities would be developed and operated in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, including health and safety as well as environmental requirements. No impacts to the health and safety of persons (inmates, staff, visitors, or contractors) are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Chapters 4 and 5 of the Revised Final EIS discuss the affected environment, environmental consequences, and mitigation if there are impacts. Additionally, Appendix A of the Revised Final EIS includes agency correspondence that describes coordination regarding necessary mitigation. 10 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-45 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 11. Clarification of potential impacts to wastewater under Alternative 1 – Payne Gap has been included in Section 4.8.2.2. Section 8.1.5, Potential Cumulative Impacts, has been updated to address the potential cumulative impacts to wastewater treatment capacity. 10 11 E1-46 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 11 12 13 12. Sections 4.8 and 5.8 in the Revised Final EIS have been revised to clarify the availability of potable water under Alternatives 1 and 2. Sections 4.8 and 5.8 of the Revised Final EIS also address the quality of the potable water supply. 13. The Draft EIS stated in Sections 4.11 and 5.11 that a Phase I bat habitat survey had been conducted and was currently under review by USFWS. The Draft EIS further stated that there is summer habitat at both alternative sites and winter habitat at the Payne Gap site. The Draft EIS also stated that coordination would be ongoing with USFWS to determine appropriate mitigation. The Bureau met with USFWS on May 20, 2015 to discuss mitigation. USFWS issued comments on the Final EIS in accordance with the Endangered Species Act and stated that the Bureau has sufficiently identified the potential impacts to threatened and endangered species as a result of the proposed project. The Bureau proposes to mitigate for take of Indiana bats and northern long-eared bats through a Conservation Memorandum of Agreement following the guidance provided in the USFWS’s April 2015 Conservation Strategy for Forest Dwelling Bats in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Sections 4.11 and 5.11 have been updated to reflect the additional coordination and updated mitigation requirements based on this coordination. Refer to Appendix A and Appendix E-2 for correspondence from USFWS. Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-47 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 14. Appropriate coordination with state and federal agencies occurred to determine if other threatened and endangered species had the potential to be affected. Agency coordination efforts are included in Appendix A and Appendix E-2 of the Revised Final EIS. 14 15. Please see response to comment 13. 15 E1-48 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 16. Appendix A of the Revised Final EIS includes agency correspondence that describes coordination regarding necessary mitigation. 15 16 The Draft EIS stated in Sections 4.11 and 5.11 that a Phase I bat habitat survey had been conducted and was currently under review by USFWS. The Draft EIS further stated that there is summer habitat at both alternative sites and winter habitat at the Payne Gap site. The Draft EIS also stated that coordination would be ongoing with USFWS to determine appropriate mitigation. The Bureau met with USFWS on May 20, 2015 to discuss mitigation. USFWS issued comments on the Final EIS in accordance with the Endangered Species Act and stated that the Bureau has sufficiently identified the potential impacts to threatened and endangered species as a result of the proposed project. The Bureau proposes to mitigate for take of Indiana bats and northern long-eared bats through a Conservation Memorandum of Agreement following the guidance provided in the USFWS’s April 2015 Conservation Strategy for Forest Dwelling Bats in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Sections 4.11 and 5.11 have been updated to reflect the additional agency coordination and updated mitigation requirements based on this coordination. Refer to Appendix A and Appendix E-2 for correspondence from USFWS. Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-49 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 16 17. Records of communication with law enforcement and emergency service providers have been included in Appendix A. The Bureau has coordinated appropriately with these providers to determine what affect the proposed action may have on their ability to provide service. The majority of inmate incidents that would occur at the proposed facility would be handled internally through the Bureau of Prisons’ disciplinary proceedings; federal criminal violations that may occur cannot be tried in state or local courts. Nearly all civil litigation involving federal inmates would also take place in federal, not state or local, courts. Therefore, no significant impact to state or local law enforcement or state or local court resources would be expected as a result of implementing the proposed action at either the Payne Gap site or the Roxana site. 17 E1-50 The Bureau’s Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is a benefit to all full-time employees. This program provides brief counseling, consultation, and referral services to all staff and their immediate family members. These free services can be used to address any variety of workrelated or personal concerns. Each facility also has its own Crisis Support Team (CST), which operates at the discretion of the warden, to attend to the needs of staff and their family during a crisis. Crises can include an individual staff member experiencing a family emergency (e.g., sick child, medical emergency, etc.) to opening and operating a Family Support Center for all staff and their families following a natural disaster. Both programs operate with the support of other regional Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky institutions and resources, as well as the Bureau's Central Office. Together, EAP and CST aim to address most of the mental health needs of its staff, and can be accessed 24/7. 17 18 19 Appendix E-1 March 2016 18. A UNICOR operation at this facility is no longer included as part of the proposed action. The Air Emissions Calculations in Appendix D and the Enhanced Utility Report in Appendix E were prepared prior to the removal of UNICOR operation from the proposed action. If UNICOR does operate at this location in the future, all applicable environmental laws and regulations will be adhered to and enforced. 19. The Revised Final EIS addresses environmental justice in accordance with EO 12898 and NEPA. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed action as described in Sections 4.3 and 5.3 of the Revised Final EIS. There are no adverse environmental impacts that would have disproportionately high or adverse environmental effects on minority or low-income populations or Indian tribes. E1-51 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 20. This is exclusively under legislative and/or election official’s oversight and beyond the Bureau's jurisdiction or control. With regard to potential dilution or other voting impacts, the incarceration of non-voting inmates at the proposed facility, regardless of where they come from, is believed to be a less than significant impact. 20 21 21. As indicated above in the response to comment 18, a UNICOR operation is no longer included in the proposed action. Cumulative impacts are to be evaluated if impacts of a proposed action on a resource, when considered in combination with impacts from other past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future projects or actions, may result in the proposed action contributing to a cumulative impact on that resource. If the agency’s proposed action does not impact a resource it will not contribute to a cumulative impact. If an agency’s proposed action does impact a resource then a cumulative impact assessment is done, if there are other actions affecting the resource. Potential cumulative impacts associated with the Bureau’s proposed action are discussed in Chapter 8. 22. NEPA requires that the EIS evaluate the potential impacts 22 23 associated with the proposed action, including socioeconomic and other environmental impacts; the Bureau has done so for this proposed project. In accordance with NEPA, a separate EIS process that appropriately evaluated potential socioeconomic and other environmental impacts was conducted individually for each of the Bureau facilities identified in the comment. 23. As stated in the Revised Final EIS, Section 1.5, Purpose and Need, the purpose of the project is to increase capacity and reduce overcrowding at high-security facilities within the MidAtlantic Region. The No Action Alternative does not meet the purpose and need of the proposed action. E1-52 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 24. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 25. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 24 26. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 25 26 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-53 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-54 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-55 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-56 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-57 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 E1-58 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The preferred alternative for the proposed action has been identified in Section 2.6, Preferred Alternative, of the Revised Final EIS. At this time there is no information regarding construction schedule. Information about access to the proposed facility for each alternative location is available in Sections 4.5 and 5.5. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-59 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-60 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-61 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-62 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-63 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-64 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-65 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-66 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-67 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-68 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-69 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-70 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-71 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-72 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-73 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS. E1-74 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-75 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-76 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-77 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS. E1-78 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-79 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-80 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-81 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-82 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-83 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-84 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-85 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 E1-86 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-87 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-88 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-89 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-90 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-91 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-92 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-93 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 E1-94 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-95 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-96 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-97 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-98 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-99 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-100 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-101 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 E1-102 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-103 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3 E1-104 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-105 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-106 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-107 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-108 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-109 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 E1-110 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-111 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-112 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-113 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 E1-114 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-115 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-116 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-117 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-118 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-119 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-120 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-121 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-122 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for your participation. Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-123 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-124 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-125 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 E1-126 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for your participation. Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-127 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-128 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-129 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-130 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-131 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-132 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-133 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 E1-134 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-135 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-136 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-137 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-138 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-139 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-140 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-141 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-142 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-143 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-144 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for your participation. Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-145 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for your participation. E1-146 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-147 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for your participation. E1-148 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-149 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for your participation. E1-150 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-151 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-152 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-153 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-154 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-155 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-156 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-157 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-158 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau appreciates your participation and would meet with families to discuss the potential acquisition of properties. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-159 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau appreciates your participation and would meet with families to discuss the potential acquisition of properties. 3. The Bureau would not impact cemeteries. 2 4. Property that is acquired by the Bureau for the facility becomes the Bureau’s property and for safety and security reasons the public cannot have access to the property. 3 5. Figure 2-3 depicts the distance between the proposed facility and nearby residences. 4 5 6 6. The Bureau would not impact or relocate cemeteries. 7. The Bureau appreciates your participation and would meet with families to discuss the potential acquisition of properties. 7 E1-160 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-161 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-162 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-163 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and 2 has noted your comment. 3 E1-164 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-165 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 E1-166 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-167 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 E1-168 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-169 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 4. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3 4 E1-170 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-171 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-172 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-173 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 E1-174 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-175 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-176 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-177 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-178 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-179 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-180 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-181 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3 E1-182 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. Owners of land acquired by the Federal Government are entitled under federal law to “just compensation,” which generally means the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the property. The FMV of each property acquired would be determined by an appraisal conducted pursuant to federal law and in accordance with the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (2000 edition). To the extent a property to be acquired contains commercial timber, the appraisal/FMV determination would typically include the timber value as a component of the entire property value. Should timber be removed/harvested by a landowner prior to acquisition, the resulting appraised value/FMV would generally be reduced to reflect the recent timber removal/harvest. Surrounding landowners, as well as owners of land acquired by the Federal Government, are generally not entitled to consequential damages or damages for any contingent or potential future damages. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-183 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3 E1-184 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-185 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-186 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-187 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-188 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-189 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-190 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-191 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 E1-192 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-193 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-194 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-195 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-196 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. Traffic impact studies were conducted for both sites. Section 5.5 in the Revised Final EIS discusses traffic and roadway conditions, potential impacts, and proposed mitigation for Alternative 2 – Roxana. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-197 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3 E1-198 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-199 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-200 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-201 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-202 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-203 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 E1-204 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-205 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 4. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 4 E1-206 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-207 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-208 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-209 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-210 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-211 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-212 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-213 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-214 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-215 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-216 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-217 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-218 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. Sections 4.8 and 5.8 of the Revised Final EIS discusses infrastructure and utilities, including solid waste. As described in the Revised Final EIS, the county would pick up solid waste from the facility. The Bureau would pay the rate assessed by the county for disposal of their solid waste. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-219 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3 E1-220 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-221 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-222 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-223 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 E1-224 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-225 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 E1-226 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau would not impact cemeteries. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-227 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3 4. The Bureau thanks you for your participation and has noted your comment. 5. The career opportunities brochure has been forwarded to your address, as there is no address provided for your mother. 4 5 E1-228 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-229 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 4. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 5. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 6. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 4 5 6 7. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 8. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 7 8 E1-230 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-231 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 4. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3 4 E1-232 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-233 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-234 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-235 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-236 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-237 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-238 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-239 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-240 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-241 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-242 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-243 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-244 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-245 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-246 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-247 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 4. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 4 5. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 5 E1-248 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-249 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-250 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-251 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 E1-252 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-253 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-254 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-255 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-256 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-257 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-258 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-259 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-260 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-261 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-262 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-263 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-264 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-265 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-266 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-267 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Owners of land acquired by the Federal Government are entitled under federal law to “just compensation,” which generally means the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the property. The FMV of each property acquired would be determined by an appraisal conducted pursuant to federal law and in accordance with the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (2000 edition). To the extent a property to be acquired contains commercial timber, the appraisal/FMV determination would typically include the timber value as a component of the entire property value. Should timber be removed/harvested by a landowner prior to acquisition, the resulting appraised value/FMV would generally be reduced to reflect the recent timber removal/harvest. Surrounding landowners, as well as owners of land acquired by the Federal Government, are generally not entitled to consequential damages or damages for any contingent or potential future damages. 1 E1-268 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-269 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 E1-270 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Section 1.7.4 of the Revised Final EIS has been revised to reflect that many comments were received, and the majority of comments were in support of the project. All comments, positive and negative, that have been submitted have been noted and will be considered by the Bureau in connection with issuance of a Record of Decision regarding the proposed action. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-271 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 2. The Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is a benefit to all full-time 2 3 4 employees. This program provides brief counseling, consultation, and referral services to all staff and their immediate family members. These free services can be used to address any variety of work-related or personal concerns. Each facility also has its own Crisis Support Team (CST), which operates at the discretion of the warden, to attend to the needs of staff and their family during a crisis. Crises can include anything as small as an individual staff member experiencing a family emergency (e.g., sick child, medical emergency, etc.) to something as large as opening and operating a Family Support Center for all staff and their families following a natural disaster. Both programs operate with the support of other regional institutions and resources, as well as the Bureau of Prison’s Central Office. Together, EAP and CST aim to address most of the mental health needs of its staff, and can be accessed 24/7. 3. The Bureau is not the agency responsible for sentencing guidelines 5 nor does it participate in the sentencing of convicted felons. The Bureau's responsibility is for housing those inmates sentenced within the federal court system. 4. No health and safety impacts are anticipated. The Bureau provides healthcare services within their institutions. Under the proposed action, the Bureau would employ healthcare staff to meet the medical, dental, and mental healthcare needs of inmates. In the event of a medical emergency that cannot be accommodated at the facility, coordination with local health care officials indicates that emergency treatment of an inmate can be accommodated by the local hospitals with no impact to the local healthcare system, as described in Sections 4.4.2.3 and 5.4.2.3 of the Revised Final EIS. 5. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. E1-272 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-273 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-274 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-275 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-276 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-277 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau is not the agency responsible for sentencing guidelines nor does it participate in the sentencing of convicted felons. The Bureau's responsibility is for housing those inmates sentenced within the federal court system. 1 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2 4. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 5. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 4 5 E1-278 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-279 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 E1-280 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2. The stream impacts in Sections 4.10 and 5.10 of the Revised Final EIS are correct. The summary table in the Executive Summary reflected inaccurate numbers. These numbers have been revised to correspond to the numbers in Sections 4.10 and 5.10. Engineering design for the proposed facility will require the development of a stormwater control plan to manage stormwater onsite and minimize potential impacts stormwater runoff may have on nearby streams. Additionally, measures would be taken to keep as much of the forested area associated with the sites and the Bureau would evaluate re-vegetation of areas post-construction to reduce runoff, erosion, and sedimentation. 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-281 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 3. The site described in your comment was not offered to the Bureau by the property owner. 3 4. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 4 E1-282 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. The Bureau has identified the Preferred Alternative in Section 2.6 of the Revised Final EIS. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-283 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1 E1-284 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-285 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3 E1-286 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-287 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3 E1-288 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3 Appendix E-1 March 2016 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. E1-289 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 E1-290 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-291 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3 E1-292 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 3. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 3 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-293 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 2. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 2 E1-294 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-295 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS. Please refer to pages E-33 through E-53 for the responses to the attachment comment letter. 1 E1-296 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Form Letter 1 Following are all the signed Form Letter 1s that were received. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-297 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Form Letter 2 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Following are all the signed Form Letter 2s that were received. 1 E1-298 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Form Letter 3 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Following are all the signed Form Letter 3s that were received. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-299 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Form Letter 4 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Following are all the signed Form Letter 4s that were received. 1 E1-300 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Form Letter 5 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Following are all the signed Form Letter 5s that were received. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-301 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Form Letter 6 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Following are all the signed Form Letter 6s that were received. 1 E1-302 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Form Letter 7 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Following are all the signed Form Letter 7s that were received. 1 Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-303 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Form Letter 8 1. The Bureau thanks you for reviewing the Draft EIS and has noted your comment. Following are all the signed Form Letter 8s that were received. 1 E1-304 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-305 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-306 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-307 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-308 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-309 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-310 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-311 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-312 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-313 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-314 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-315 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-316 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-317 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-318 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-319 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-320 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-321 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-322 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-323 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-324 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-325 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-326 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-327 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-328 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-329 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-330 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-331 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-332 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-333 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-334 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-335 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-336 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-337 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-338 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-339 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-340 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-341 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-342 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-343 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-344 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-345 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-346 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-347 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-348 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-349 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-350 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-351 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-352 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-353 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-354 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-355 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-356 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-357 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-358 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-359 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-360 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-361 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-362 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-363 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-364 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-365 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-366 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-367 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-368 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-369 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-370 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-371 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-372 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-373 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-374 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-375 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-376 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-377 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-378 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-379 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-380 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-381 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-382 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-383 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-384 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-385 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-386 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-387 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-388 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-389 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-390 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-391 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-392 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-393 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-394 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-395 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-396 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-397 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-398 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-399 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-400 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-401 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-402 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-403 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-404 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-405 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-406 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-407 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-408 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-409 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-410 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-411 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-412 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-413 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-414 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-415 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-416 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-417 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-418 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-419 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-420 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-421 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-422 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-423 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-424 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-425 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-426 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-427 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-428 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-429 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-430 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-431 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-432 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-433 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-434 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-435 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-436 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-437 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-438 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-439 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-440 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-441 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-442 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-443 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-444 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-445 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-446 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-447 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-448 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-449 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-450 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-451 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-452 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-453 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-454 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-455 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-456 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-457 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-458 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-459 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-460 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-461 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-462 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-463 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-464 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-465 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-466 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-467 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-468 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-469 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-470 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-471 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-472 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-473 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-474 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-475 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-476 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-477 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-478 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-479 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-480 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-481 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-482 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-483 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-484 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-485 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-486 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-487 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-488 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-489 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-490 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-491 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-492 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-493 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-494 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-495 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-496 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-497 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-498 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-499 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-500 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-501 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-502 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-503 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-504 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-505 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-506 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-507 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-508 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-509 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-510 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-511 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-512 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-513 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-514 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-515 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-516 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-517 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-518 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-519 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-520 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-521 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-522 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-523 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-524 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-525 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-526 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-527 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-528 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-529 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-530 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-531 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-532 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-533 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-534 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-535 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-536 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-537 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-538 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-539 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-540 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-541 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-542 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-543 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-544 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-545 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-546 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-547 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-548 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-549 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-550 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-551 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-552 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-553 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-554 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-555 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-556 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-557 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-558 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-559 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-560 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-561 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-562 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-563 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-564 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-565 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-566 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-567 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-568 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-569 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-570 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-571 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-572 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-573 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-574 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-575 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-576 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-577 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-578 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-579 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-580 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-581 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-582 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-583 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-584 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-585 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-586 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-587 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-588 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-589 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-590 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-591 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E1-592 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-1 March 2016 E1-593 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) E1-594 Appendix E-1 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX E-2 COMMENTS ON FINAL EIS Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) E2-2 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky FINAL EIS COMMENT INDEX Commenter by Category Page Number Federal/State/Local Agencies U.S. EPA Region 4 (Christopher A. Militscher) U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (Virgil Lee Andrews, Jr.) Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection (Ronald T. Price) E2-5 E2-6 E2-7 to E2-8 Organizations and Businesses Abolitionist Law Center (Dustin McDaniel) Human Rights Defense Center (Paul Wright) Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition (Janet Keating) Pine Mountain Grill E2-9 to E2-22 E2-23 to E2-38 E2-39 to E2-40 E2-40 Individuals Ruth Bamberger Reed Caudill Anna Craft Alana Godner-Abravanel Margaret Hammonds (Whitaker Bank) Jill Harmer Sandy Hogg Carol Ison (Cowan Community Center) Mary K. Miller Corinne Sereni Tony A. Sergent (Letcher County Public Schools) Dena C. Sparkman (Whitesburg ARH Hospital) Jenny Wright Denise Yonts (Letcher County Public Schools) E2-41 E2-41 E2-42 E2-42 E2-43 E2-43 E2-44 E2-44 E2-45 E2-45 E2-46 E2-46 E2-47 E2-47 Petition Online Petition – received 625 signatures Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-48 to E2-80 E2-3 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) E2-4 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-5 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-6 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-7 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-8 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-9 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-10 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-11 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-12 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-13 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-14 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-15 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-16 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-17 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-18 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-19 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-20 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-21 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-22 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-23 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-24 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-25 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-26 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-27 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-28 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-29 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-30 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-31 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-32 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-33 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-34 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-35 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-36 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-37 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-38 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-39 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-40 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-41 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-42 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-43 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-44 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-45 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-46 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-47 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-48 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-49 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-50 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-51 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-52 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-53 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-54 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-55 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-56 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-57 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-58 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-59 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-60 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-61 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-62 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-63 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-64 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-65 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-66 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-67 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-68 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-69 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-70 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-71 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-72 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-73 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-74 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-75 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-76 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-77 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-78 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E-2 March 2016 E2-79 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky E2-80 Appendix E-2 March 2016 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX F TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Appendix F March 2016 F-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) F-2 Appendix F March 2016 Federal Correctional Facility Environmental Impact Statement Draft Traffic Impact Study Prepared for: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Revision History: Revision Date Description Submitted by 1 2/26/15 Revisions by Cardno L. Walker 2 3/25/15 Revisions by Federal Bureau of Prisons L. Walker 3 4/23/15 Revisions by Kentucky Transportation Cabinet L. Walker TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Study Purpose and Objectives ............................................................................. 1 1.2. Summary of Proposed Action ............................................................................... 1 1.3. Study Area ................................................................................................................ 1 1.4. Data Collection ....................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Existing Conditions and Level of Service...................................................................... 3 3.0 Development .................................................................................................................. 4 4.0 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................... 7 5.0 Trip Distribution and Assignment ................................................................................... 7 6.0 Traffic Forecasting and Analysis ................................................................................... 8 7.0 Construction Traffic Impacts on Roadway ................................................................... 9 8.0 Recommendations / Conclusion ................................................................................ 13 Appendix A – Traffic Counts Appendix B – HCS Output Appendix C – TIS Figures Appendix D – ESAL Calculations Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility i Traffic Impact Study April 2015 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 3-1: Payne Gap Site Development Plan.......................................................................... 5 Figure 3-2: Roxana Site Development Plan................................................................................. 6 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1: AM Peak Period ............................................................................................................. 4 Table 2-2: PM Peak Period ............................................................................................................. 4 Table 4-1: Trip Generation Results ................................................................................................. 7 Table 6-1: Future Year (2020) AM Peak Period ........................................................................... 8 Table 6-2: Future Year (2020) PM Peak Period............................................................................ 8 Table 6-3: Payne Gap Site Intersection Analysis ........................................................................ 8 Table 6-4: Roxana Site Intersection Analysis ............................................................................... 9 Table 7-1: FHWA Vehicle Classification (from FHWA) .............................................................. 11 Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility ii Traffic Impact Study April 2015 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1. Study Purpose and Objectives Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was contracted by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to conduct a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) and provide related traffic engineering services in the evaluation of two alternative sites for a proposed federal correctional facility in Letcher County, Kentucky. The purpose of this TIS is to analyze the traffic operating conditions in the vicinity of the new facility. Specific attention will be given to the proposed access points that will serve the development. It is the goal of this document to follow the guidelines1 established by the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) on traffic impact studies that impact state-maintained facilities. 1.2. Summary of Proposed Action The “Proposed Action” is a proposed federal correctional facility. It is expected that during construction the Proposed Action would temporarily add the following types of trips to the highway network: Construction worker commuting trips Trips involving the delivery and removal of construction equipment Following construction, the proposed facility would add traffic to the surrounding roadway network on a recurring basis. This traffic increase would include employee commuting trips, plus additional trips (such as the transfer of inmates, inmate visitors, delivery of supplies and equipment, etc.) that would not necessarily coincide with peak commuting periods. The proposed facility would have a staff of 300 full-time employees. The employees would be expected to add trips during peak commuting periods. Based on hourly count data from KYTC, existing peak periods are 7:00 – 9:00 AM and 3:00 – 5:00 PM on a typical weekday. 1.3. Study Area Two potential sites have been identified for the Proposed Action. The first site is referred to as the Payne Gap Site. It is located approximately 7.5 miles to the east of Whitesburg, Kentucky. The site is accessed from US 119 and is located east of Bottom Fork Road (KY 3406) and west of Talman Drive. The other site is referred to as the Roxana Site. It is located approximately 7.5 miles to the west of Whitesburg, Kentucky. The site is located south of KY 588 and to the west of KY 160. The site locations are shown in Figure 1-1. 1 2012 KYTC Traffic Impact Study Requirements; http://transportation.ky.gov/Permits/Documents/2012%20POLICY-TIS%20Requirements.pdf Letcher County 1 Traffic Impact Study Federal Correctional Facility April 2015 Figure 1-1: Study Area Access to the Payne Gap Site is expected to be from US 119 only. Roxana Site is expected to be from KY 588 just east of Tolson Creek 1.4. Access to the Data Collection Data (including Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes) collected for this TIS was obtained from two different sources: 1) Existing 48-hour traffic counts provided by the KYTC for routes located near the study sites. These include the following stations: o o o o US 119 – Station 272: 2013 AADT = 6,010 KY 160 – Station 755: 2014 AADT = 550 KY 588 – Station 796: 2014 AADT = 330 KY 2036 – Station 776: 2012 AADT = 80 2) Supplemental 48-hour classification counts at four locations conducted January 19 – 21, 2015. These counts were performed at the following locations: Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 2 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 o o o o US 119 (east of intersection with KY 805) KY 160 (between KY 2036 and KY 588) KY 588 (Big Branch Tolson Creek) KY 588 (just north of Paces Branch Rd) All count data is included in Appendix A. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE For this analysis, the Highway Capacity Software 2010 package (HCS 2010) based on the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual was used to assess the peak period traffic operating conditions for the following study segments that are expected to be most impacted by the Proposed Action: US 119 KY 588 US 119 is a four-lane facility with a flush median, and is therefore evaluated as a multilane highway. KY 588 is a two-lane facility and is considered to be a Class II highway2. Class II highways include lower speed collector roadways and roads primarily designed to provide access. Levels of service for Class II highways are defined only in terms of a vehicle’s percent time spent following. Percent time spent following is the average percent of total travel time that vehicles must travel in platoons behind slower vehicles because of inability to pass on a two-lane highway3. Average travel speed is not considered since drivers typically will tolerate lower speeds on a Class II facility because of its function as an access roadway (serving shorter trips and fewer through trips). For each study segment, the volume to capacity ratio (v/c) as well as the resulting levels of service (LOS) was determined. It was assumed that LOS D or better would be acceptable for KY 588 (rural mountainous collector) based on guidelines from the AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (6th Edition). For US 119 (rural level arterial), LOS B is the desired LOS based on the same guidelines. Also, it should be noted that all HCS 2010 output is included in Appendix B. The major software inputs require roadway geometry (i.e. lane and shoulder widths), as well as traffic volumes by direction. The roadway geometry for the existing conditions was determined from the HIS database as well as aerial photos. The traffic volumes were determined from the data collection efforts. Based on previous hourly counts from KYTC as well as the hourly counts conducted for this study, the peak hours on a weekday were noted between 7:00 – 9:00 AM and 3:00 – 5:00 PM. The highest hourly volumes from the counts were used for this analysis from these time periods. Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 present the v/c ratio and level of service for the study area segments for both the AM and PM peak periods. 2 Highway classifications for two-lane facilities based on the Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Letcher County 3 Traffic Impact Study Federal Correctional Facility April 2015 3 Table 2-1: AM Peak Period Segment v/c ratio LOS US 119 KY 588 0.08 0.04 A A Table 2-2: PM Peak Period Segment v/c ratio LOS US 119 KY 588 0.09 0.02 A A Traffic volumes are very low on KY 588 (less than 50 vehicles per hour). Based on the analysis of the v/c ratio, there is plenty of available capacity along these segments. A ratio of 1.0 is considered at capacity and all ratios shown are substantially below that threshold. 3.0 DEVELOPMENT A copy of the development plan for the correctional facility or United States Penitentiary (USP) was provided by the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Included in this development plan were locations of site access, parking areas and the internal roadway network. The anticipated completion date is 2020. Figure 3-1 and Figure 3-2 provides the preliminary development plans for informational purposes only. Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 4 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 Figure 3-1: Payne Gap Site Development Plan Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 5 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 Figure 3-2: Roxana Site Development Plan Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 6 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 4.0 TRIP GENERATION The primary development under consideration is a federal correctional facility. A review of the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition) does provide data for a similar land use (Land Use 571). Two values are presented for both the AM and PM Peak hours: 1) Number of trips generated in the peak hour of the generator; and, 2) In/out distribution percentages of those trips. The variable these values are based on is the number of employees. Background information provided by Cardno during the scoping process of this study noted that the proposed facility would have a staff of 300 full-time employees. Employees would be expected to add trips during peak commuting periods. Utilizing this information, Table 4-1 provides a summary of the trip generation results. As both sites would have the same number of employees, these numbers are valid for both the Payne Gap and Roxana sites. Table 4-1: Trip Generation Results Variable AM Peak PM Peak 156 62% 38% 204 27% 73% Trips Generated Percent In Percent Out A higher number of trips are expected to be generated in the PM Peak period based on the previous studies performed and documented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual of traffic patterns associated with a federal correctional facility. There are expected to be other trips to / from the sites that would not necessarily coincide with peak commuting periods. These trips include transfer of inmates, inmate visitors, and delivery of supplies and equipment. Given the low volumes on both KY 588 and US 119, there is expected to be little to no impact related to these off-peak trips. The peak periods evaluated represent the “worst case” scenario for traffic impacts to the existing routes. 5.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The data collected for this study was used to determine directional splits of traffic entering / exiting the sites. Only trips generated by the site are included in the distribution and assignment. It is assumed that no pass-by trips are expected for this study given the proposed development. Due to the unique nature of the site as well, it is expected that there will not be any internal capture trips for this study. Appendix C provides a summary of the trip generation / trip distribution for this study. Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 7 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 6.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTING AND ANALYSIS The next step involved forecasting the traffic volumes for year 2020 (anticipated opening year). This was done using historical traffic trends of nearby KYTC count stations. The stations included 272 (US 119) and 796 (KY 588) in Letcher County. The change in traffic volumes from year to year resulted in an average decline for each of these stations ranging from 0.68% to 6.35% per year. Given the trending decline in growth, the conservative estimate for traffic impacts in the future would be to assume no growth at this point. Therefore, volumes evaluated for the 2020 year analysis are assumed to be the same as those used for the current year analysis. Table 6-1 and Table 6-2 presents the level of service for the two segments previously evaluated utilizing the assumed 2020 base year volumes with the added trip generation due to the new prison facility. Table 6-3 and Table 6-4 provide analysis for the new intersections created by the new access road to the prison. The initial analysis assumed the intersections were STOP controlled on the minor approach (access road) with the mainline (KY 588 and US 119) left at free-flow conditions. No turn lanes were assumed for the initial analysis as well to provide a baseline for operations. Table 6-1: Future Year (2020) AM Peak Period Segment v/c ratio LOS US 119 KY 588 0.10 0.09 A B Table 6-2: Future Year (2020) PM Peak Period Segment v/c ratio LOS US 119 KY 588 0.11 0.10 A B Table 6-3: Payne Gap Site Intersection Analysis Approach AM Approach Delay (sec) AM Approach LOS PM Approach Delay (sec) PM Approach LOS Westbound Northbound 8.2 12.3 A B 8.0 13.3 A B Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 8 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 Table 6-4: Roxana Site Intersection Analysis Approach AM Approach Delay (sec) AM Approach LOS PM Approach Delay (sec) PM Approach LOS Westbound Northbound 7.5 9.6 A A 7.4 9.7 A A As shown, the intersections at both sites operate at an acceptable LOS. Based on these volumes, no separate turn lanes are warranted at this time. A review of traffic signal warrants (per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)) found that none of the volume warrants were met (Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume, Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume, and Warrant 3: Peak Hour). Therefore, installation of a traffic control signal is not warranted at this time. After consultation with the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC), a recommendation was made to consider constructing a left turn lane along US 119 and KY 588 into the site. This consideration was made base on safety implications – looking to reduce the possibility of a following vehicle rear-ending the turning vehicle. It may be necessary to move some of the grade drains in the middle of the median along US 119 depending on the exact entrance to the access road. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IMPACTS ON ROADWAYS An additional task as part of this evaluation includes determining the construction impacts on the roadways accessing the sites. First, an analysis of the existing pavement of the two key routes was conducted using construction plans (as available) from KYTC. US 119 Construction traffic may come from the east (Jenkins area) or west (Whitesburg area) along US 119. US 119 is a main route in Eastern Kentucky and should be able to support all associated construction traffic for the development of the site. The evaluation of the pavement and the supportable load is given below. Archived design plans for the section of US 119 near the proposed site are from 1971. The design plans note the following: 24” Stabilized Rock Roadbed 11” Crushed Stone Base 2.75” Asphalt Base Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 9 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 2.75” Asphalt Base 1” Asphalt Surface An Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL) is a measure of pavement damage and is used in pavement design. The ESALs (based on future year traffic and truck volumes) is 2,400,000. According to the KYTC calculation sheet, the current design should be acceptable up to 7,000,000 ESALs. The ESAL calculation sheet is included in Appendix D. It should be noted that US 119 is a state-maintained coal haul route and has a maximum gross vehicle weight of 80,000 lbs per KYTC Truck Weight Classification. Therefore, this route is intended to accommodate heavy truck traffic. KY 588 The construction traffic would likely access this site from Whitesburg. This route follows KY 3401 to KY 588 / KY 160. It is a total of approximately 10 miles. The available archived plans for KY 588 show it as a gravel road. However, it has been paved since then though those plans were not available for review. Through email communication with KYTC it was confirmed that no design plans were available. Therefore, for purposes of this study, an assumption was made that the pavement design of KY 588 would be less than that of a designated US Route such as US 119. It was further assumed that KY 588 (as a rural minor collector road with given traffic volumes and truck traffic) would have a pavement design as follows: 4” Crushed Stone Base 3.00” Asphalt Base 3.00” Asphalt Base 1.25” Asphalt Surface The ESALs (based on future year traffic and truck volumes) for KY 588 are calculated at 100,000. The ESAL calculation sheet is included in Appendix D. Determination or confirmation of the pavement design and calculation of the maximum ESALs the pavement could support should be made and compared to the calculated ESALs (based on traffic volumes) to confirm if the existing pavement can support the projected loadings. It can be noted that per KYTC Truck Weight Classification, KY 588 is designated as a class “A” highway with a maximum gross vehicle weight of 44,000 lbs. Construction Traffic Types Next, research was conducted to obtain the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) vehicles classification. These categories are presented in Table 7-1. Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 10 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 Table 7-1: FHWA Vehicle Classification (from FHWA) Type Description Typical ESALs per Vehicle Motorcycles All two- or three-wheeled motorized vehicles. Typical vehicles in this category have saddle type seats and are steered by handle bars rather than wheels. This category includes motorcycles, motor scooters, mopeds, motorpowered bicycles, and three-wheel motorcycles. This vehicle type may be reported at the option of the State. negligible All sedans, coupes, and station wagons manufactured primarily for the purpose of carrying passengers and including those passenger cars pulling recreational or other light trailers. negligible Other Two-Axle, Four-Tire Single Unit Vehicles All two-axle, four tire, vehicles, other than passenger cars. Included in this classification are pickups, panels, vans, and other vehicles such as campers, motor homes, ambulances, hearses, and carryalls. Other two-axle, fourtire single unit vehicles pulling recreational or other light trailers are included in this classification. negligible 4 Buses All vehicles manufactured as traditional passenger-carrying buses with two axles and six tires or three or more axles. This category includes only traditional buses (including school buses) functioning as passengercarrying vehicles. All two-axle, four-tire single unit vehicles. Modified buses should be considered to be a truck and be appropriately classified. 0.57 5 Two-Axle, Six-Tire, Single Unit Trucks All vehicles on a single frame including trucks, camping and recreational vehicles, motor homes, etc., having two axles and dual rear wheels. 0.26 6 Three-Axle Single Unit Trucks All vehicles on a single frame including trucks, camping and recreational vehicles, motor homes, etc., having three axles. 0.42 Class 1 2 3 Passenger Cars Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 11 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 Typical ESALs per Vehicle Description Class Type 7 Four or More Axle Single Unit Trucks All trucks on a single frame with four or more axles. 0.42 8 Four or Less Axle Single Trailer Trucks All vehicles with four or less axles consisting of two units, one of which is a tractor or straight truck power unit. 0.30 9 Five-Axle Single Trailer Trucks All five-axle vehicles consisting of two units, one of which is a tractor or straight truck power unit. 1.20 10 Six or More Axle Single Trailer Trucks All vehicles with six or more axles consisting of two units, one of which is a tractor or straight truck power unit. 0.93 11 Five or Less Axle MultiTrailer Trucks All vehicles with five or less axles consisting of three or more units, one of which is a tractor or straight truck power unit. 0.82 12 Six-Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks All six-axle vehicles consisting of three or more units, one of which is a tractor or straight truck power unit. 1.06 13 Seven or More Axle MultiTrailer Trucks All vehicles with seven or more axles consisting of three or more units, one of which is a tractor or straight truck power unit. 1.39 Flatbed trucks that may transport construction equipment to / from the site would be classified as a Class 13. Most dump trucks will be classified as Class 7. Therefore construction equipment at the site may consist of a range of vehicles between these classes but these will be assumed to provide the upper and lower boundaries of impact. To avoid damage to the existing roadways, it is recommended that the construction traffic loading not exceed the determined design pavement ESAL loadings calculated for each location. For US 119, vehicle weight limits should not exceed 80,000 lbs to comply with legal weight limits on this route. Mitigation Measures US 119 is not expected to have adverse impacts related to construction traffic based on the assessment of pavement design and geometric standards. Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 12 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 KY 588 has the potential to require mitigation measures due to additional construction traffic given the narrow lane widths and pavement design that is not at a level for a national or state truck route. Construction traffic may also affect other roadways in Letcher County. The location and intensity of these impacts can be estimated following the selection of the construction contractor(s). To minimize impacts on KY 588, and other potentially affected roadways in Letcher County, the selected construction contractor would be required to perform an assessment of the routing of construction traffic to the site. Based on this analysis, the contractor would be required to: 8.0 To the extent feasible, route construction vehicles so that the gross vehicle weight does not exceed the maximum weight limitations established by the KYTC and / or the pavement loading conditions set forth by the ESAL evaluation. For roadways that construction traffic may exceed these limitations, damage to the roadway surface would be need to be repaired by the contractor. For oversized vehicles and loads, maintenance of traffic plans should be developed to accommodate to maintain traffic flow during transport times. This will likely utilize flaggers to negotiate traffic flow as a result of narrow lanes. RECOMMENDATIONS / CONCLUSION The results presented in this document provide an overview of the anticipated traffic impacts associated with the construction of a proposed federal correctional facility in Letcher County, Kentucky. Based on the analysis conducted for this study: Both proposed sites have minimal impact on the traffic operations of the existing nearby state routes (US 119 and KY 588). The projected LOS for traffic operations is LOS A or B which is at or better than the desired LOS B for US 119 and LOS D for KY 588. Consideration should be given to constructing a left turn lane on US 119 and KY 588 into the site to minimize the potential for rear-end vehicle collisions. Depending on the exact site access, grade drains may need to be moved. Construction impacts to the existing US 119 roadway are expected to be minimal (if any). KY 588 has the potential to require mitigation measures as it is not a designated truck route and has limiting geometric features including narrow lane widths. Other roadways in Letcher County may also be affected, depending on the origin(s) of construction trips. The selected contractor for the development of this project would be required to perform an assessment of the routing of construction traffic to the site and potentially repair any surface damage caused by moving equipment as well as provide maintenance of traffic plans for moving oversized vehicles / equipment. Letcher County Federal Correctional Facility 13 Traffic Impact Study April 2015 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX G ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Appendix G March 2016 G-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) G-2 Appendix G March 2016 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp Payne Gap, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared by: October 2015 United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street, NW Washington, DC 20534 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SUMMARY Cardno was retained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) at a 753-acre property, herein referred to as the subject property, located in eastern Letcher County, Kentucky. The subject property, which composed of multiple parcels under private ownership, is being considered for purchase by the Federal Bureau of Prisons for the construction of a new federal correctional facility. This ESA meets or exceeds the requirements of the American Society for Materials and Testing (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process E 1527-13. This document follows the recommended structure for an ESA provided in ASTM E 1527-13. This report was prepared pursuant to an inquiry into the prior ownership and uses of the subject property, consistent with good commercial and customary practice. A REC is defined as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. A REC can include hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions and are defined as conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. No Phase I ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs to exist in connection with a property. This ESA has been prepared to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the existence of RECs in connection with the property, recognizing the limits of cost and time. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the subject property except for an open plastic storage tank with stained soil located at the oil pumping station near the northeast portion of the property. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 2 3 4 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Detailed Scope of Services ........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Significant Assumptions ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Limitations and Exceptions........................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Special Terms and Conditions ...................................................................................................... 3 1.6 User Reliance ................................................................................................................................ 3 Site Description .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location and Legal Description .................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics ..................................................................................... 4 2.3 Current Use of the Property .......................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Description of Structures, Roads and other Improvements on the Subject Property .................... 4 2.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties ........................................................................................... 4 2.6 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.6.1 Climate .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.6.2 Topography ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.6.3 Geology ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.6.4 Soils....................................................................................................................................... 6 2.6.5 Surface Water........................................................................................................................ 6 2.6.6 Groundwater ......................................................................................................................... 6 User Provided Information ................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ................................................................. 7 3.2 Specialized Knowledge ................................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ............................................................................ 7 3.4 Owner, Manager, Occupant Information ...................................................................................... 7 Records Review .................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Title Records ................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2 Standard Environmental Record Sources...................................................................................... 9 4.3 Additional Environmental Record Sources................................................................................. 11 4.3.1 Building Permit Records ..................................................................................................... 11 4.3.2 Tax Map .............................................................................................................................. 11 i Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA 4.4 5 6 7 Historical Use Information of Subject Property and Adjoining Properties ................................ 11 4.4.1 Historical Topographic Maps.............................................................................................. 11 4.4.2 Historical Aerial Photos ...................................................................................................... 12 4.4.3 Sanborn Maps ..................................................................................................................... 13 4.4.4 City Directories ................................................................................................................... 13 Site Reconnaissance............................................................................................................................ 14 5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ....................................................................................... 14 5.2 General Site Setting .................................................................................................................... 14 5.3 Exterior and Interior Observations .............................................................................................. 14 Interviews ........................................................................................................................................... 15 6.1 Owners ........................................................................................................................................ 16 6.2 Officials....................................................................................................................................... 16 6.3 Lessees ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................... 16 7.1 8 October 2015 Findings....................................................................................................................................... 16 7.1.1 Storage Tanks and Pipelines ............................................................................................... 17 7.1.2 Solid Waste ......................................................................................................................... 17 7.1.3 Septic Tanks and/or Leachfields ......................................................................................... 17 7.2 Opinion and Recommendations .................................................................................................. 17 7.3 Data Gaps .................................................................................................................................... 17 7.4 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 18 7.5 Limiting Conditions/Deviations.................................................................................................. 18 Non-Scope Considerations ................................................................................................................. 18 8.1 Asbestos Containing Materials ................................................................................................... 18 8.2 Lead Based Paint......................................................................................................................... 18 8.3 Radon .......................................................................................................................................... 18 9 References........................................................................................................................................... 19 10 Certification ........................................................................................................................................ 20 ii Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Parcel Identification and Property Owners ..................................................................................... 4 Table 2. Deed History of Subject Property Parcels....................................................................................... 8 Table 3. Mining Permit Holders of Subject Property ................................................................................... 9 Table 4. Federal, Kentucky, and Virginia Records – EDR Report ASTM Standard Radius Search .......... 10 Table 5. Historical Topographic Maps Reviewed....................................................................................... 12 Table 6. Historical Aerial Photos Reviewed ............................................................................................... 12 APPENDICES Appendix A: Figures Appendix B: Photographic Record Appendix C: Radius Map Appendix D: Topographic Maps Appendix E: Aerial Photographs Appendix F: City Directories Appendix G: User Questionnaire Appendix H: Qualifications iii Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose Cardno was retained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) at a 753-acre property located in Letcher County, Kentucky, approximately 7 miles northeast of Whitesburg. The subject property is situated along the Kentucky and Virginia border and south of the North Fork Kentucky River just west of its confluence with Kings Creek, and south of U.S. Route 119 (Figure 1 in Appendix A). Cardno conducted this ESA in accordance with the ASTM International Designation: E1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM E1527-13). This standard defines good and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a parcel of real estate with respect to petroleum products and the range of contaminants regulated under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The ASTM standard is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the “innocent landowner” defense to CERCLA liability. However, it should be noted that the property subject to this ESA is composed of multiple, privately-owned parcels of land. This document follows the recommended structure for an ESA provided in ASTM E1527-13. The goal of this Phase I ESA is to identify RECs on the subject property. A REC is defined as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. A REC includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions, generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment, and generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Structures on the subject property were also assessed for the potential presence of suspect asbestos-containing material, lead-based paint, and radon although no samples were collected during the Phase I ESA. This Phase I ESA report documents the environmental conditions of the subject property as observed on July 22 and 23, 2015. The results of this assessment are limited to a visual site reconnaissance, a state and federal regulatory database review, and interviews with individuals familiar with the subject property. No samples were collected of any environmental media (soil, water, asbestos, etc.) during this study. Information pertaining to environmental issues was gathered through site observations, interviews, and available documentation, as appropriate. A series of photographs taken at the subject property is included in the Photographic Record (Appendix B). 1.2 Detailed Scope of Services This report was prepared in response to the request by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to conduct an ESA in accordance with ASTM E1527-13. The scope of services for this ESA included the following: • Phase I ESA in accordance with the standards of the ASTM as set forth in Practice E 1527-13. 1 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA • • • • October 2015 Title search or assessor records review back to the first developed use or to 1940, whichever is earlier. Visual site inspection of the subject property and surrounding area to evaluate present conditions. Evaluation of the historical use of the subject property, by reviewing aerial photographs and historic topographic maps reasonably available from public sources and Sanborn maps. Review of records reasonably available from appropriate federal, state, and local regulatory agencies for documented soil and/or groundwater contamination investigations conducted at the subject property and vicinity, as defined in the ASTM standard. • Review of the compliance history of the subject property, and of any adjacent sites, as identified by the regulatory database review. • • • Interviews with individuals familiar with the subject property and surrounding areas. Review of the proposed site plan. Presentation of the aforementioned services in this report. 1.3 Significant Assumptions The research, site reconnaissance, and interviews conducted in support of this ESA are based upon assumptions intended to be referred to in resolving any ambiguity or exercising such discretion as is accorded the user or environmental professional in performing an ESA or in judging whether a user or environmental professional has conducted appropriate inquiry or has otherwise conducted an adequate ESA. These assumptions are as follows: • Records reviewed are assumed to be complete as provided by the source of the record (government agencies or commercial services) and current as of the date of review. Government information obtained from non-governmental agencies is considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the governmental agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public. • It is assumed that person(s) interviewed in connection with this ESA have answered all questions posed by the person(s) conducting the interview, in good faith, to the extent of their actual knowledge. • No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with a property. This ESA is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with a property, and within reasonable limits of time and cost. All appropriate inquiry does not mean an exhaustive assessment of a clean property. There is a point at which the cost of information obtained or the time required to gather it outweighs the usefulness of the information and, in fact, may be a material detriment to the orderly completion of transactions. • Not every property will warrant the same level of assessment. Consistent with good commercial or customary practice, the level of assessment was guided by the type of property subject to assessment, the expertise and risk tolerance of the user, and the information developed in the course of the inquiry. It is assumed that ESAs must be evaluated based on the reasonableness of judgments made at the time and under the circumstances in which they were made. Subsequent ESAs should not be considered valid standards to judge the appropriateness of any prior 2 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 assessment based on hindsight, new information, use of developing technology or analytical techniques, or other factors. 1.4 Limitations and Exceptions In preparing this report, Cardno has relied on information derived from secondary sources, computer databases, and personal interviews. Except as detailed in the report, Cardno has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of the information derived from the secondary sources cited in the report. Cardno makes no claims, warranties, or guarantees as to the accuracy of the information contained within the studies, reports, and data reviews that Cardno did not complete for this assessment. Cardno therefore offers this report based on the assumption that such information is accurate and complete. The findings, observations, and conclusions set forth in this report are limited by the client (also referred to as “user”) and/or contract technical specifications and the methods employed in meeting these specifications. The services requested by the client have been performed in accordance with currently accepted industry standards for the conduct of ESAs. In order to perform a comprehensive environmental evaluation, subsurface investigation and testing would be required in order to definitively determine whether contamination has affected the subject property. This ESA is site-specific in that it relates to assessment of environmental conditions on a specific parcel of commercial real estate. Consequently, this practice does not address many additional issues raised in transactions such as purchases of business entities, or interests therein, or of their assets, that may well involve environmental liabilities pertaining to properties previously owned or operated or other off-site environmental liabilities. 1.5 Special Terms and Conditions No special terms and conditions associated with the preparation of this report were identified. 1.6 User Reliance This report was prepared solely for the use of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and is not intended for use by third parties. Unauthorized third parties shall indemnify and hold Cardno harmless against any liability for any loss arising out of, or related to, reliance by any third party on any work performed hereunder, or the contents of this report. 2 SITE DESCRIPTION The following text provides a legal description of the subject property, its location, and the general characteristics of the property and surrounding area. 2.1 Location and Legal Description The subject property consists of approximately 753 acres of land encompassing 10 parcels with nine separate land owners identified by the Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN) listed in Table 1. The subject property is located in Payne Gap, Kentucky. The location and boundary of the subject property is illustrated in figures contained in Appendix A. 3 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Table 1. Parcel Identification and Property Owners APN Owner 051-00-00-105.00 Mrs. John C. Craft 051-00-00-108.01 David and Judy Wayne 052-00-00-017.00 Walter Kincer 052-00-00-024.00 James Bullion 052-00-00-023.00 James Bullion 052-00-00-021.00 Donna Bullion 052-00-00-025.00 Louella Hitchcock 052-00-00-022.00 Wilise Page 051-00-00-108.00 Elijah Johnson 052-00-00-042.01 Elkhorn Stone 2.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics The subject property is located approximately 7 miles east of Whitesburg, Kentucky. It is south of U.S. Route 119, east of Bottom Fork Road (KY 3406), and west of Talman Drive (Dark Hollow). The area was previously deep mined; however, mining activities no longer occur at the subject property. Land use surrounding the subject property is also primarily forested, with small single-family residences adjacent to the subject property. There are no zoning ordinances or land use classifications identified for this area (DePriest 2013). 2.3 Current Use of the Property Land use associated with the subject property consists primarily of forested areas. The subject property is adjacent to the Jefferson National Forest. A few residences are located on the perimeter of the subject property. Recreational activities such as off-roading with all-terrain vehicles and hunting occur on the subject property. 2.4 Description of Structures, Roads and other Improvements on the Subject Property Fork Drive and Talman Drive both provide access to the subject property. U.S. Route 119 is designated as a rural principal arterial by the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (2014). Several unnamed, unimproved roads and trails are found on the subject property and may be remnants of mining access roads. Two residences are located on the subject property near the center of its western border. 2.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties Surrounding land uses are predominantly residential to the north, east, and west of the subject property. To the south, the subject property abuts the Virginia border, beyond which is a continuation of the Jefferson National Forest. 4 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 2.6 Physical Setting The following sections describe the environmental setting of the subject property and include information on climate, topography, geology, soils, surface water, and groundwater. 2.6.1 Climate The subject property is located in the Eastern Kentucky Coal Field Region. This region experiences mild spring and autumn weather, but temperatures rise to 90 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) an average of 20 days per year (Arnold 2015). The Kentucky climate is characterized by warm summers, with average high temperatures in the mid-80s, and cool winters, with average low temperatures in the high-30s to mid-40s. Kentucky experiences average annual precipitation ranging from over 40 inches in far northern Kentucky to more than 50 inches in south central Kentucky. Precipitation tends to be well distributed throughout the year, though the fall is typically a bit drier than other seasons. Weather producing extremes of precipitation can develop quickly or persist for extended periods. Flash floods, usually resulting from intense but short lived thunderstorms or from storms training over an area, occur throughout Kentucky, but are a particular concern in the rugged terrain of eastern Kentucky, which is characterized by steep slopes and narrow valleys. Drought occurs periodically in Kentucky. When it does, it is often accompanied by oppressive heat (Foster no date [n.d.]). 2.6.2 Topography The topography on the subject property is typified by the mountains valleys complex associated with western Appalachian Mountains. The topography at Payne Gap has been significantly affected by strip mining activities, which historically occurred on the subject property and ceased in the early 1990’s. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute Jenkins West topographic quadrangle map, the elevation on subject property ranges from a low of 1,385 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the northwest corner of the subject property adjacent to the North Fork of the Kentucky River and a high of 2,965 feet AMSL on Pine Mountain in the southern portion of the subject property (University of Kentucky 2013). The majority of slopes on subject property are very steep, well over 15 percent. 2.6.3 Geology The subject property is underlain by the Breathitt Group, which is composed of the Pikeville Formation and the Hyden Formation. The geology underlying the subject property is primarily Pikeville Formation, which is composed of numerous coal zones, shale members, and limestones (Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky 2015). The area of interest within the project limits has been mined through a combination of pre-law contour mining and room and pillar deep mining from 1950 through 1990. An extensive search of Kentucky mining databases revealed that the coal seams of importance in the area of the subject property consist of the following (in descending order): Upper and Lower Amburgy seams (approximate elevation 1,810 feet), and Upper Elkhorn Number 3 (approximate elevation 1,640 feet). Some of the crop coal of the Elkhorn 3 seam was removed by “pre-law” contour strip mining prior to 1950. Between 1950 and 1960, the majority of the crop coal was removed by the room and pillar method of deep mining. The remaining on-site crop coal of the Elkhorn 3 was removed by contour strip mining; this occurred through 1990. 5 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Extensive mine spoil in varying depths was put back on the abandoned contour strip benches during mine reclamation. These benches are now heavily forested (Letcher County Planning Commission 2009). 2.6.4 Soils The soils underlying the subject property are varied as a result of topography and mining disturbance, but none of the soils are listed as hydric by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The three most common soils at the subject property are composed of the Cloverlick-Kimper-Highsplint complex (30-65 percent slopes), the Dekalb-Gilpin-Raye complex (25-65 percent slopes), and the Kaymine, Fairpoint, and Fiveblock soil series (2-70 percent slopes). To a lesser degree, the following soils underlie the subject property: Caneyville-Renox-Bledsoe complex (50-80 percent slopes), Shelocta-Highsplint complex (30-65 percent slopes), and Urban land Udorthents complex (0-15 percent slopes) (NRCS 2015). These soils have not been designated by NRCS as prime farmland soils. 2.6.5 Surface Water Although the National Wetlands Inventory mapping does not depict any wetlands on the subject property, approximately 2.84 acres (1.15 hectares) of wetlands have been delineated on the subject property (TEC Inc. 2011; Cardno 2014). Wetlands are located throughout the site and are generally associated with surface drainage features, depressions and areas of ponding. Several intermittent, perennial, and ephemeral streams were delineated on subject property (TEC Inc. 2011; Cardno 2014). The North Fork Kentucky River is located just north of the subject property, Laurel Fork is located to the west of the subject property, and Cook Hollow/Holbrook Brook is located to the east of the subject property. The subject property is depicted on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 21133C00140C. According to the map, the subject property is not located in a 100-year floodplain (FEMA 2008). 2.6.6 Groundwater Two domestic single household drinking water wells are located near the northern boundary of the subject property. Well ID 00057785 is approximately 560 feet east of Fork Drive and is reported to be 100 feet deep. Well ID 00045519 is located approximately 530 feet southeast of Fork Drive and is reported to be 160 feet deep (Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky 2015). Groundwater flow tends to follow the sloped topography and is assumed to flow to the north, east, and west towards the North Fork Kentucky River, Cook Hollow, and Laurel Fork, respectively. Variations in groundwater conditions are expected based on location and elevation across the subject property, seasonal conditions, and weather patterns. The subject property is underlain by the Breathitt Group, which is comprised of the Pikeville Formation and the Hyden Formation. The Breathitt Group yields more than 500 gallons per day in more than three-quarters of the wells drilled in valley bottoms, more than 500 gallons per day in about threequarters of the wells on hillsides, and more than 100 gallons per day to nearly all wells on ridges within Letcher County (Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky 2015). There are no sole source aquifers underlying the subject property (United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] 2013). The quality of the groundwater in Letcher County ranges from moderately hard in most of the county to moderately soft south of Pine Mountain. Naturally occurring contaminants present in the groundwater 6 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 consist of sulfate, salt (sodium chloride), iron, and manganese (Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky 2015). According to the Kentucky Division of Water, Groundwater Branch, Letcher County has areas of moderate and high sensitivity to groundwater pollution. The hydrogeologic sensitivity reflects the ease and speed with which a contaminant can move into and within a groundwater system. The hydrogeologic sensitivity of Letcher County has been assigned a value of three out of five, with five being the most susceptible to groundwater pollution and one being the least susceptible. The region is given a three due to the observation that subcutaneous drains and enlarged fractures influence groundwater recharge, fissure networks influence flow, and bidirectional dispersal patters influence overall dispersion (Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection 1994). 3 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 3.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations No information on environmental liens or activity and use limitations were provided by the user. 3.2 Specialized Knowledge No specialized knowledge about the subject property was provided by the user. 3.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues No information on valuation reduction for environmental issues was provided by the user. 3.4 Owner, Manager, Occupant Information The subject property is currently comprised of ten separate parcels with nine property owners. Current property owners are listed in Table 3-1. 4 RECORDS REVIEW The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review records that will help identify RECs in connection with the property. Reasonably ascertainable information from standard environmental and historical record sources is reviewed for the subject and surrounding properties. The objective of consulting historical sources is to develop a history of the previous uses of the property and the surrounding area, in order to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to RECs in connection with the property. Some standard historical sources may be excluded if the sources are not reasonably ascertainable, or if past experience indicates that the sources may not be sufficiently useful, accurate, or complete in terms of satisfying the objectives. 4.1 Title Records Title records for the subject property were reviewed at the Whitesburg Courthouse on July 24, 2015 and are summarized in Table 2. Title records were reviewed back to the first developed use or to 1940, whichever is earlier. 7 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA APN 051-00-00-105.00 051-00-00-108.01 052-00-00-017.00 052-00-00-024.00 052-00-00-023.00 052-00-00-021.00 052-00-00-025.00 052-00-00-022.00 October 2015 Table 2. Deed History of Subject Property Parcels Owner Deed Date Purchased (Current owner shown in bold) Book/Page Mrs. John C. Craft 330/635 November 16, 1994 Donald Lee and Mary Rutherford 330/635 September 7, 1989 Reed Wright Allie Isom Presnell 291/410 September 7, 1989 G.W. Holbrook 86/161 October 14, 1935 David and Judy Wayne 368/246 October 15, 2003 Danny Lee and Joyce Mae Mullins 309/488 September 23, 1992 Samuel and Janice Johnson 280/675 November 7 1986 Joyce Mullins 289/296 December 10, 1984 Walter Kincer 379/234 April 19, 2005 Marie Reed 367/276 January 22, 2003 James Reed and Betty Ables 341/174 December 15, 1998 Emmett and Victoria Kincer 191/362 December 17, 1970 Alice Vanover 424/362 August 9, 1965 Ira Craft No data September 8, 1921 James Bullion 399/295 October 30, 2008 Isaac Craft 391/658 September 7, 2008 Milburn and Francis Craft 188/373 April 7, 1970 Reuben and Norma Craft, Judy 62/450 December 21, 1921 Bullion Craft and Blaine Bullion Northern Coal and Coke Company 38/304 December 10, 1920 James Bullion 389/518 May 21, 2007 Norma Lee Craft 366/695 November 16, 2001 Dale and Stephanie Craft, Donald and 188/374 April 7, 1970 Cora Craft, and William and Linda Sue Williams Norma Lee and Reuben Craft 188/374 April 7,1970 Milburn and Francis Craft, Judy Craft 62/450 December 15, 1971 Bullion and Blaine Bullion Northern Coal and Coke Company 38/304 December 10, 1920 Donna Bullion 354/665 June 14, 2001 Thelma Bullion 295/375 July 14, 1990 Virgil Bullion 185/166 March 31, 1969 Nagatha Venter and Alberta and Jesse 173/293 April 23, 1966 Elkins Laura Brown and John Henry Bentley 173/293 April 23, 1966 Nagatha and Alberta Elkins 149/599 May 27, 1957 Isaac Brown 70/160 January 14, 1927 Louella Hitchcock 392/193 September 24, 2007 Julia Bullion 133/272 December 31, 1949 Marion and Huldy Craft 62/450 December 15, 1921 Northern Coal and Coke Company 38/304 December 10, 1920 Wilise Page 376/659 March 10, 2005 Leona Page 376/656 February 11, 1958 Sillar Craft 66/510 September 23, 1924 8 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA APN 051-00-00-108.00 052-00-00-042.01 October 2015 Table 2. Deed History of Subject Property Parcels Owner Deed Date Purchased (Current owner shown in bold) Book/Page 314/418 September 1992 Elijah Johnson et al. William and Della Johnson 129/43 December 23, 1948 Nannie Isom Craft 59/227 February 9, 1920 402/655 July 15, 2009 Elkhorn Stone Pine Mountain Stone 354/436 January 1, 2001 Clarence Moore and Sam Webb 169/249 Jun 18, 1964 W Melvin and Jean Adams 156/268 June 19, 1959 Elkhorn Coal Company 154/519 December 12, 1958 Commonwealth of Kentucky 151/262 October 8, 1957 A review of the Kentucky Coal Mine Map Viewer and Information System as well as the Kentucky Surface Mining Viewer provided information regarding mining permit holders for the subject property. Mining permit holders are summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Mining Permit Holders of Subject Property State File/Permit Number 92407 A through H 02141/01004 20703/00444 01574 04397-A 05323 04397 02703 17775-2 Permittee Myrtle Coal Co., Elkhorn Coal Co., Little Jake Coal Co., Addington Coal Co., KY River Coal Co., Bentley & White Coal Co., Dotson Coal Co., Johnson Coal Co., Lester Cook Coal Co., Siler & Bates Coal Co. Don Smith Coal Co., Edna Coal Co., Clean Coal Co. Anchor Coal Co. Don Smith Coal Co., Johnson Coal Co., Edna Coal Co., Lester Cook Coal Co., Siler & Bates Coal Co., K. Dan Coal Co. Don Smith Coal Co., Laurel Branch Coal Co., Johnson Coal Co., Lester Cook Coal Co., Adair Coal Co., Siler & Bates Coal Co., W.H. Coal Co., Myrtle Coal Co., KY River Coal Co., Lester Cook Coal Co., Clean Coal Co., Don Smith Coal Co., Johnson Coal Co. Elkhorn Coal Co. Harlow Coal Co. Freeman Fuels of Kentucky Inc. Year 1950 1955 1956 1956 1956 1957 1959 1960 1990 4.2 Standard Environmental Record Sources Documents reviewed for the preparation of this report included the search results of federal and Commonwealth of Kentucky environmental records databases, USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle historical topographic maps, historical aerial photographs, and Sanborn fire insurance maps. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) was contracted to prepare a GeoCheckTM Report to identify potential sources of contamination at the subject and adjacent properties (EDR 2015a). The GeoCheckTM Report was derived from the search of federal and Commonwealth of Kentucky environmental database 9 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 records for the subject and adjacent properties. The report was prepared to meet, at a minimum, the government records search requirements of ASTM E1527-13. EDR also provided the USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle historical topographic maps, historical aerial photographs, and Sanborn maps. Table 4 lists the ASTM-required search databases, the distance searched per database, and the associated results. Due to the size of the parcel being investigated, minimum search distances were extended onequarter mile to ensure complete coverage for the multi-parcel subject property. Extension of the search radius resulted in the need to include some Commonwealth of Virginia databases in the search. Appendix C contains the GeoCheckTM Report, including the list of searched databases (ASTM-required as well as supplemental databases), database descriptions and results, dates when updates were made, specified search distances, and maps. Only one of the numerous databases searched, the KY SPILLS database, contained information relevant to the subject property. The KY SPILLS database is a listing of spill and/or release related incidents. One incident, recorded in 2006, documents the reporting of fugitive emissions of dust from coal truck traffic in an area off of U.S. Route 119 halfway between Jenkins and Whitesburg in Bill Lewis Hollow. Based on the nature and location of the reported release, to the east of the subject property, the incident it is not considered to pose a threat of contaminating the subject property. Table 4. Federal, Kentucky, and Virginia Records – EDR Report ASTM Standard Radius Search Database FEDERAL NPL Proposed NPL Delisted NPL NPL liens CERCLIS CERCLIS-NFRAP FEDERAL FACILITY CORRACTS RCRA-TSDF RCRA-LQG RCRA-SQG RCRA-CESQG ERNS KENTUCKY KY&VA SHWS KY&VA SWF/LF KY SB139 KY PSTEAF INDIAN LUST KY UST INDIAN UST FEMA UST KY&VA ENG CONTROLS KY&VA INST CONTROLS KY&VA VCP INDIAN VCP KY&VA BROWNFIELDS 10 Search Radius (miles) Number of Sites Identified 1.25 1.25 1.25 0.25 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.25 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.25 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Table 4. Federal, Kentucky, and Virginia Records – EDR Report ASTM Standard Radius Search Database Search Radius (miles) 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 US BROWNFIELDS DEBRIS REGION 9 ODI KY HIST LF KY SWRCY INDIAN ODI US CDL KY CDL US HIST CDL HMIRS KY&VA SPILLS Number of Sites Identified 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Source: EDR 2015a. Note: See Appendix C for a complete report, including explanation and description of acronyms. 4.3 Additional Environmental Record Sources A list of the additional records sources reviewed/searched during the preparation of this Phase I ESA is provided in the EDR Radius Map report contained in Appendix C. Only one additional database, the Mines Master Index File (US MINES), contained information regarding the subject property. The US MINES database contains mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. According to the database, 8 mines are located on or within a half-mile of the subject property. 4.3.1 Building Permit Records The complete collection of building permit data available to EDR was searched, and as of June 16, 2015, EDR did not have access to building permits for the municipality in which the subject property is located. 4.3.2 Tax Map EDR performed a search of available property tax maps for the subject property and identified no tax map coverage for the area including the subject property. 4.4 Historical Use Information of Subject Property and Adjoining Properties 4.4.1 Historical Topographic Maps Historical USGS topographic maps are useful for identifying historical land uses in an area, including road networks, development, and agricultural uses and other land use designations. The results of the review of USGS data from historical topographic maps for the years available are presented in Table 5. Copies of the referenced maps are contained in Appendix D. 11 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Table 5. Historical Topographic Maps Reviewed USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle Date 1914 1954 Jenkins West 1979 1992 Details Observed The 1914 topographic map depicts the subject property as being largely undeveloped. Structures located on or near the property are located along existing streams and surface waters of Laurel Fork, Kentucky River, and Holbrook Brook. Route 119 to the north is depicted as a light duty road. Several more structures are depicted on the subject property and unimproved roads are depicted entering the subject property from its western border along Laurel Fork and its eastern border along Holbrook Brook, which is now labeled Cook Hollow. The area is labeled “Strip Mines” and several tunnel or cave entrances are depicted on the subject property. Route 119 to the north has been improved to a secondary highway. The 1979 topographic map looks the same as the 1954 map except the subject property now contains multiple areas of mine tailing deposition throughout the subject property that coincide with the subject property topography. The 1992 topographic map looks similar to the 1979 map except that the mine tailing areas are no longer depicted and several coinciding areas are no longer depicted as being forested. Route 119 to the north has been improved to a highway. Source: EDR 2015b. 4.4.2 Historical Aerial Photos Photographs taken from an aerial platform with sufficient resolution to allow for the identification of development and activities occurring on the subject property and adjoining properties were obtained from EDR and reviewed. The results of the review of the historical aerial photographs for the years available are presented in Table 6. Multiple aerial photos were reviewed for the years 2010, 2011, and 2012 in order to provide complete coverage of the subject property. Copies of these aerial photographs are contained in Appendix E. Table 6. Historical Aerial Photos Reviewed Date 1952 1961 1975 1979 1988 Details Observed The northern half of the subject property is being actively mined and access roads and several areas of disturbance are visible. Disturbed areas appear to coincide with topography. The southern half of the subject property is undisturbed and forested. The 1961 photo is similar to the 1952 photo; however, mining activity appears to have diminished. Disturbed areas in the northern half of the subject property appear smaller in size and are less apparent. The southern half of the subject property is not depicted in the 1961 photos. The 1975 photo is similar to the 1961 photo; however, mining activity appears to have diminished even further. Disturbed areas in the northern half of the subject property appear even smaller in size and are less apparent. The southern half of the subject property is undisturbed and forested. The 1979 photo looks the same as the 1975 photo. Mining activity appears to have increased in the northeastern portion of the subject property in the 1988 aerials photos and new areas of disturbance are apparent. Fork Road is also visible at the subject property’s northern boundary. The southern half of the subject property is undisturbed and forested. 12 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Table 6. Historical Aerial Photos Reviewed Date 1995 2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Details Observed Mining activity in the northeast portion of the subject property is greatly expanded and large areas appear to have been cleared. The northwestern portion of the subject property appears to be recovering and areas of disturbance are becoming less apparent. The southern half of the subject property is undisturbed and forested. The 2000 photo is similar to the 1995 photo; however, mining activity appears to have diminished. Disturbed areas in the northeastern portion of the subject property appear smaller in size and are less apparent. A vehicle staging area can be seen at the northeast corner of the subject property. The southern half of the subject property is undisturbed and forested. In the 2005 photo, nearly all of the formerly mined areas have been vegetated with only one small area of disturbance being visible near the eastern boundary of the subject property. Mining activity appears to have moved to the eastern adjacent area. A residence appears to be located near the western boundary of the subject property. The southern half of the subject property is undisturbed and forested. In the 2008 photo, nearly all of the formerly mined areas have been vegetated and are becoming increasingly forested. Only two small areas of disturbance are on the subject property. Mining activity to the east also appears to have diminished with disturbed areas becoming revegetated. The southern half of the subject property is undisturbed and forested. The 2009 photo appears the same as the 2008 photo. The two small areas of disturbance continue to be disturbed and appear to contain unimproved roads In the 2010 photos, a road traversing the subject property appears to have been widened and improved. The remainder of the subject property appears the same as in the 2009 photo. The 2011 photos appear the same as the 2010 photo. The 2012 photos appear the same as the 2011 photo. Source: EDR 2015c. 4.4.3 Sanborn Maps The complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection were searched by EDR with regard to the subject property, and no fire insurance maps covering the subject property were found. 4.4.4 City Directories A City Directory Report for the subject property was provided by EDR. City Directories are reviewed to evaluate the potential liability of the subject property resulting from past activities. The EDR City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5-year intervals. Cole Information Services Directories were searched for the years 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003, 2006, and 2013. The subject property and adjoining property addresses and property owners were not listed for any of the years searched. Several properties were listed on Highway 119 North for the years 1999, 2003, 2006, and 2013. Only one property, a commercial business, was identified near the subject property in the city directories. The 2006 and 2013 city directories list Kings Corner Rhino Linings was located at 7937 Highway 119 North, across the highway from the subject property. This property was also listed as Perfect Fit Truck and Car Accessories in the 2003 city directory (EDR 2015d). A copy of the city directory search results is contained in Appendix F. 13 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 5 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The objective of the site reconnaissance is to obtain information indicating the likelihood of RECs in connection with the property that may not be obvious to the owner/occupants. 5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions The Cardno staff visited the subject property on July 22 and July 23, 2015 and conducted site reconnaissance to identify visible evidence of potential environmental contamination. Specifically, the ESA team looked for evidence of previous contamination such as: • • • • • • • stained surface soils or distressed vegetation; disturbed surface soils or reclaimed areas; discarded containers, residues, and pools of liquid; electrical equipment such as transformers and capacitors; aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), underground storage tanks (USTs), piping, sumps, or other types of impoundment structures; abandoned structures and associated utilities; and drainage structures and direction of stormwater runoff on the subject parcels and adjacent areas. The survey involved visually inspecting the subject property and the adjoining properties to the extent that these properties were readily accessible during the time of the visual inspection. Cardno staff members inspected the subject property and conducted interviews with persons who were knowledgeable about the historical and current use of the subject property. A complete set of photographs from this inspection is provided in Appendix B and interview forms are provided in Appendix G. The photographs locations are depicted on Figure 2 in Appendix A. 5.2 General Site Setting The subject property is located in a mountainous area of eastern Kentucky and was historically subject to coal mining activity that has resulted in large areas of tailing deposits and steep slopes across the subject property. The subject property is primarily forested, with isolated cleared areas and remnants of a warehouse type structure. A small oil extraction facility is also located on the subject property. The subject property abuts Jefferson National Forest at its southern boundary. 5.3 Exterior and Interior Observations The subject property is largely undeveloped but contains remnant structures from historical mining activities. Along the eastern boundary of the subject property, an active oil extraction operation was observed on property owned by Elkhorn Stone, Incorporated. Placards on the oil extraction equipment indicated it was the property of EQT. The pumping station was secured within a chain link fence and no stained soils or other obvious sign of surface contamination were observed. It should be noted that heavy overnight rains had occurred prior to the site inspection resulting in wet soils that could obscure stains from view. To the north of the pumping station, two aboveground tanks, one plastic and one steel, were observed. Both tanks were within an unlined bermed area and were placarded as containing petroleum crude oil. The plastic container was observed to be open on top and an approximately 2-foot-long area of darkly stained soil was observed beneath it along its western edge. EQT was contacted regarding the tanks, but did not respond to inquiries. Additional rust stained areas were observed near the tank piping. 14 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 No obvious staining was observed beneath the steel tank. The open plastic tank with stained soil is considered to be a REC. South of the oil pumping station are the remnants of a 75 foot by 35 foot warehouse type structure. The structure was of concrete block construction with a concrete slab-on-grade floor and steel roof trusses. The interior of the structure contained floor drains, and roof trusses were observed to be painted. Fires appear to have been lit inside the structure. Based on review of historic aerial photos the structure appears to have been constructed in the late 1990s. Moving southwest through the heavily forested area, a natural gas transmission pipeline was observed. Further west was a large grassy clearing containing a hunting blind, field camera, and feeding station. A tractor was observed at the western extent of the clearing along with tiller and mower attachments, a mattress frame, and several empty containers. The tractor appeared to be in good condition and no leaks or stains were observed on or beneath it. A sandy clearing was observed to the east of the grassy clearing. A portion of the clearing appeared to be heavily worn by off-road vehicles in a small track-like area. An oily sheen observed on some of the puddle surfaces within the track area is considered to be a de minimis condition. Numerous discarded tires were observed in this area as well as empty plastic bottles and other small amounts of household trash. To the west of the track area was a heavily eroded sandy area. The erosion had exposed buried PVC piping. The piping appeared to lead to an area of cinder blocks. Based on review of historic aerial photos, it appears that a manufactured building may have been located in this area when the subject property supported mining operations. The PVC piping is assumed to have conveyed water and possibly waste material to and from the building. A single, pole-mounted light was also observed in this area. No transformers were observed in the vicinity of the light. To the south of the eroded area, a log road leads south up toward Indian Grave Gap. PVC piping was observed along the road side. Several hundred feet up the trail, the PVC piping was observed to be broken with water flowing out of it. At the terminus of the log road a large steel cistern with an interior plastic tank was observed. The cistern appeared to be placed in this location for the collection of spring water for conveyance downhill. It is assumed that this PVC pipeline was connected to the structure whose remnants were observed in the eroded area. A dumping area was observed off of the access road from Bottom Fork-Laurel Fork Road. This dumping area contained an intact cathode ray tube television and construction debris. A second dumping area containing tires was observed along the access road that traverses the northern portion of the subject property. No visible evidence of releases (e.g., distressed vegetation, stained surface soils) was observed in the vicinity of the two dumping sites and no hazardous materials (i.e., paints, solvents pesticides) were observed among the discarded materials. 6 INTERVIEWS The objective of the interviews is to obtain information indicating the likelihood of RECs in connection with the property. In the case of abandoned properties, where there is evidence of potential unauthorized uses of the abandoned property or evidence of uncontrolled access to the abandoned property, interviews with one or more owners or occupants of neighboring or nearby properties are conducted. 15 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 6.1 Owners Cardno interviewed Mr. Elijah Johnson on July 24, 2015 with regard to the condition of the subject property. Mr. Johnson is a current landowner of a large area of the subject property. For the purposes of this Phase I ESA he is considered to be the major occupant of the subject property. Mr. Johnson had no knowledge of any land use restrictions, liens, chemical usage, or historic disposal activities on the subject property. All coal excavations were backfilled with overburden and all machinery used for mining was removed from the subject property. Mr. Johnson had no knowledge of any remediation activities being conducted on the subject property. Cardno interviewed Mr. Link Lemaster of Mountain Enterprises (an affiliate of Elkhorn Stone) on September 28, 2015 with regard to the property. According the Mr. Lemaster, Elkhorn Stone only owns the mineral rights to the limestone on the subject property. Mr. Lemaster indicated that there was a residence on the subject property (Appendix B, Photos 20–25) at one time and that the PVC piping observed during site reconnaissance supplied water to the residence. 6.2 Officials Cardno staff interviewed Mr. Elwood Cornett, Chairman of the Letcher County Planning Commission, on September 3, 2015 regarding the subject property. According to Mr. Cornett, the property was subject to surface mining and deep mining activity for the removal of coal ore. No processing of coal was conducted on the subject property. Coal ore was removed from the subject property and trucked elsewhere for processing. Mr. Cornett had no knowledge of any liens or use limitations associated with the site or of any hazardous materials being present, historically or currently, on the subject property. 6.3 Lessees According to a Mine History report prepared as part of a site feasibility study, the last mining operation at Payne Gap occurred in the 1990s and was conducted by Freeman Fuels of Kentucky, Incorporated. Cardno attempted to contact Mr. Daniel V. Freemen, Director of Freeman Fuels, on September 28, 2015, but he was not available to answer questions (the person answering the call reported his unavailability was due to poor health). Prior to the 1990s mining operations, the area was mined by several companies in the 1950s and 1960s. Similar attempts were made to contact personnel associated with those mining companies and were unsuccessful. 7 EVALUATION 7.1 Findings The results of the visual site inspection, record search, and interviews pertaining to the subject property are discussed below. These findings reflect conditions identified at the subject property or considered to have the potential to affect the subject property and include, but are not limited to, RECs, Controlled RECs, Historical RECs and de minimis conditions as defined in ASTM E1527-13. 16 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 7.1.1 Storage Tanks and Pipelines The open plastic storage tank located at the oil pumping station near the northeast portion of the subject property is considered to be a REC due to the fact that the open tank presents a material threat of release. The stained soil observed adjacent to the tank is also indicative of a release and considered a REC. The fact that the bermed area is unlined is an environmental concern. Although no leaks or stains were observed at the oil pump near the plastic tank, it is considered to be an environmental concern as it is a potential source of petroleum contamination. 7.1.2 Solid Waste Several areas where dumping has occurred were observed on the subject property and are an environmental concern. Although no hazardous materials were observed, the refuse and debris should be removed from the subject property. 7.1.3 Septic Tanks and/or Leachfields A residence was historically located on the subject property and was plumbed with PVC piping. This piping was observed to convey water to the former site of the residence. Additional piping was also observed that may be associated with an on-site septic system. Plastic piping observed to be buried in the vicinity of the residence is an environmental concern. 7.2 Opinion and Recommendations Based on information collected during the preparation of this report, a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment should be performed on the subject property, prior to its acquisition, to confirm the absence/presence of hazardous materials or petroleum products. Specifically the Phase II ESA is recommended at the open plastic tank located at the oil pumping station. At a minimum, it is recommended that field screening of surficial soils be conducted to determine whether a release of petroleum has occurred. If field screening indicates the presence of petroleum in surficial soils, subsurface soil samples should be collected to determine the depth and extent of the release. Prior to sampling, the area should be assessed to determine the presence and effectiveness of any liners inside the bermed area. If groundwater is encountered, groundwater grab samples are recommended. It is also recommended that all household trash, tires and debris be removed from the subject property and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. 7.3 Data Gaps No information regarding the warehouse structure, its use, or potential contents was obtained and is considered a data gap. Information regarding this structure and its use would indicate whether the floor drains observed within it are potential sources of environmental contamination. No information regarding the residential structure formerly located on the site was obtained and is considered a data gap. Information regarding the residence would indicate whether a leachfield is present on the subject property. Limited information regarding the coal mining operations conducted at the site was available for review and no persons directly involved in coal mining activities at the site were available for interview. Therefore, the extent of coal mining operations cannot be ascertained and is considered a data gap. It is 17 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 unknown whether any coal processing was historically conducted at the subject property or how fuels, oils, lubricants, and machinery were stored, managed, or disposed of during mining operations. 7.4 Conclusions Cardno has performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527 of the subject property in Payne Gap, KY. Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 8.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property except for the open plastic storage tank with stained soil located at the oil pumping station near the northeast portion of the subject property. 7.5 Limiting Conditions/Deviations No substantial deviations from ASTM Practice E 1527-00 were involved with the preparation of this report. The subject property was characterized by steep slopes and thick undergrowth that limited access to many areas. All reasonable attempts were made to inspect the subject property to the fullest extent. 8 NON-SCOPE CONSIDERATIONS 8.1 Asbestos Containing Materials No sampling for asbestos was conducted as part of this Phase I ESA. No potentially asbestos containing materials were observed during the site inspection. 8.2 Lead Based Paint No sampling for lead based paint was conducted as part of this Phase I ESA. Based on review of historic aerial photographs, the warehouse structure observed on the subject property appears to have been constructed in the late 1990s and therefore is not likely to contain lead based paint. 8.3 Radon Radon is a naturally occurring, colorless, odorless, radioactive gas produced by the decay of uranium in rock and soil. Radon is a known carcinogen, responsible for increasing the risk of lung cancer when inhaled. Electrically charged radon atoms can attach to indoor air dust particles. Subsequently these dust particles may be inhaled and adhere to the lining of the lungs. The deposited atoms decay by emitting radiation that has the potential to cause cellular damage. Typically outside air contains very low levels of radon (USEPA 2015), but tends to accumulate in enclosed indoor spaces. When present, radon gas would typically concentrate in relatively airtight buildings with little outside air exchange. The USEPA classifies Letcher County as having a moderate potential for radon intrusion (Zone 2). Zone 2 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level between 2 and 4 picocuries per liter (pCi/L). The USEPA action level for radon is 4 pCi/L. 18 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 9 REFERENCES Arnold, Elizabeth. 2015. Climate in the Regions of Kentucky. USA Today. http://traveltips.usatoday.com/climate-regions-kentucky-104975.html Cardno. 2014. Draft Supplemental Jurisdictional Delineation Payne Gap and Roxana Sites. Prepared for Federal Bureau of Prisons. August. DePriest, Joe. 2013. Economic Development Director, Letcher County. Personal Communication. Environmental Data Resources (EDR). 2015a. The EDR Radius Map™ Report With Geocheck. June 16, 2015. . 2015b. EDR Historical Topographic Map Report. . 2015c. EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package. . 2015d. EDR City Directory Image Report. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2008. Flood Insurance Rate Map Letcher County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas. Map number 21133C0140C. March 18. Foster, Stuart. No date (n.d.). Highlighting Kentucky’s Climate: What You Expect Isn’t Always What You Get. Kentucky’s Climate, Tho Cocorah’s “State Climates” Series. Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection. 1994. Division of Water: Groundwater Branch. Groundwater Sensitivity Regions of Kentucky. http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsweb/download/wrs/sensitivity.pdf. Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky. 2015. Kentucky Geologic Map Information Service. http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsmap/kgsgeoserver/viewer.asp. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. 2014. Functional Classification. http://transportation.ky.gov/Planning/Pages/Functional-Classification.aspx. Letcher County Planning Commission. 2009. Mine History Report Volume III, Payne Gap Site. Prepared by Summit Engineering. August. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2015. Websoil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. TEC Inc. 2011. Draft Wetland Identification and Delineation Report, Payne Gap/Lawson Site, Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for Federal Bureau of Prisons. August. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2013. Region 4: Ground Water Protection, Sole Source Aquifers in the Southeast http://www.epa.gov/region4/water/groundwater/r4ssa.html. . 2015. Radon (Rn). http://www.epa.gov/radon/. Updated March 3, 2015, accessed June 1, 2015. 19 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 10 CERTIFICATION I declare, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess the property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. October 8, 2015 Erika A. Fuery Date Environmental Scientist Cardno 20 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix A: Figures Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK K E N T U C K Y _ ^ Letcher County £ ¤ 119 119 £ ¤ u nt Ke y ck rg Vi Legend Subject Property Boundary Major Road ia in Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Figure 1. Subject Property Location Map 0 0.25 0.5 Miles ± Photos 3 through 6 Photos 1 and 2 Photos 7 through 10 Legend Figure 2 Photo Location Map (1 of 3) Photo Location Subject Property Boundary 0 125 ± 250 Feet Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Photo 11 Photo 28 Photo 27 Photo 12 Photos 13 through 15 Legend Figure 3 Photo Location Map (2 of 3) Photo Location Subject Property Boundary 0 125 250 Feet ± Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Photos 16 through 18 Photo 22 Photos 20 and 21 Photo 19 Photo 23 Photos 24 and 25 Legend Figure 4 Photo Location Map (3 of 3) Photo Location Subject Property Boundary 0 125 250 Feet ± Photo 26 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA Appendix B: Photographic Record October 2015 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photo Number: 1 Description: Oil pumping station near eastern boundary of subject property Photo Number: 2 Description: Piping associated with oil pumping station. Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 3 Description: Storage tanks within unlined bermed area northeast of oil pumping station Photo Number: 4 Description: Steel oil storage tank Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 5 Description: Plastic storage tank with stained soil Photo Number: 6 Description: Open top of plastic storage tank Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 7 Description: Remnants of warehouse structure Photo Number: 8 Description: Floor drain in warehouse structure Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 9 Description: Painted roof trusses in warehouse structure Photo Number: 10 Description: Remnants of fire in warehouse structure. Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 11 Description: Gas transmission line observed near center of subject property Photo Number: 12 Description: Hunting blind in grassy clearing near western boundary of subject property Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 13 Description: Tractor and mattress frame at western end of grassy clearing Photo Number: 14 Description: Tractor and mower attachment Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 15 Description: Tiller attachment for tractor at western end of grassy clearing Photo Number: 16 Description: Abandoned tires near sandy clearing near eastern boundary of subject property Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 17 Description: Discarded tires near sandy clearing near eastern boundary of subject property Photo Number: 18 Description: Oily sheen in puddle in race track area near sandy clearing Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 19 Description: Pole mounted light fixture in heavily eroded sandy area Photo Number: 20 Description: PVC piping exposed by erosion Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 21 Description: Additional PVC piping exposed by erosion Photo Number: 22 Description: Remnants of manufactured building Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 23 Description: Broken PVC pipe conveying water Photo Number: 24 Description: Cistern structure for water collection Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 25 Description: Interior of water collection cistern Photo Number: 26 Description: Indian Grave Gap Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 27 Description: Dump site containing electronics and construction debris Photo Number: 28 Description: Discarded tires Location: Payne Gap, KY Date: July 2015 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix C: Radius Map Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Paynes Gap 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 Inquiry Number: 4327237.23s June 16, 2015 The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck® 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com FORM-LBB-DXG TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 12 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-11 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC4327237.23s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 199 COUNTY ROAD 1417 MAYKING, KY 41837 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 37.1421000 - 37˚ 8’ 31.56’’ 82.6972000 - 82˚ 41’ 49.92’’ Zone 17 349261.6 4111780.8 1849 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: Most Recent Revision: 37082-B6 JENKINS WEST, KY VA 1992 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT Portions of Photo from: Source: 20120706, 20120627 USDA TC4327237.23s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 199 COUNTY ROAD 1417 MAYKING, KY 41837 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS RELATIVE ELEVATION DIST (ft. & mi.) DIRECTION A1 FREEMAN FUELS OF KY US MINES Lower 1 ft. A2 BLUEGRASS AUGERS INC US MINES Lower 1 ft. 3 M & N CONSTRUCTION C US MINES Lower 1 ft. A4 FREEMAN FUELS OF KY US MINES Lower 1 ft. KY SPILLS Lower 661, 0.125, NE 5 B6 BLUE GRASS AUGERS IN US MINES Lower 1442, 0.273, WSW B7 A & T AUGERING INC US MINES Lower 1442, 0.273, WSW B8 FREEMAN FUELS OF KY US MINES Lower 1443, 0.273, WSW 9 PHILLIPS CREEK COAL US MINES Higher 1965, 0.372, SE 4327237.23s Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL Proposed NPL NPL LIENS National Priority List Proposed National Priority List Sites Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS FEDERAL FACILITY Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA-SQG RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS US INST CONTROL Engineering Controls Sites List Sites with Institutional Controls TC4327237.23s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS KY SHWS VA SHWS State Leads List This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists KY SWF/LF VA SWF/LF Solid Waste Facilities List Solid Waste Management Facilities State and tribal leaking storage tank lists KY SB193 KY PSTEAF INDIAN LUST SB193 Branch Site Inventory List Facility Ranking List Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists KY UST VA UST INDIAN UST FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries KY ENG CONTROLS VA ENG CONTROLS KY INST CONTROL VA INST CONTROL Engineering Controls Site Listing Engineering Controls Sites Listing State Superfund Database Voluntary Remediation Program Database State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites KY VCP VA VCP INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites Voluntary Remediation Program Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites VA BROWNFIELDS KY BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Site Specific Assessments Kentucky Brownfield Inventory ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations TC4327237.23s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ODI KY HIST LF KY SWRCY INDIAN ODI Open Dump Inventory Historical Landfills Recycling Facilities Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL KY CDL US HIST CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Clandestine Drub Lab Location Listing National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS VA SPILLS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Prep/Spills Database Listing Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR DOT OPS DOD FUDS CONSENT ROD UMTRA TRIS TSCA FTTS HIST FTTS SSTS ICIS PADS MLTS RADINFO FINDS RAATS RMP KY UIC VA UIC KY DRYCLEANERS VA DRYCLEANERS KY NPDES VA NPDES KY AIRS VA AIRS KY LEAD INDIAN RESERV SCRD DRYCLEANERS KY Financial Assurance KY COAL ASH RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Incident and Accident Data Department of Defense Sites Formerly Used Defense Sites Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Records Of Decision Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Substances Control Act FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Section 7 Tracking Systems Integrated Compliance Information System PCB Activity Database System Material Licensing Tracking System Radiation Information Database Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Risk Management Plans UIC Information Underground Injection Control Wells Drycleaner Listing Drycleaner List Permitted Facility Listing Comprehensive Environmental Data System Permitted Airs Facility Listing Permitted Airs Facility List Environmental Lead Program Report Tracking Database Indian Reservations State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Financial Assurance Information Listing Coal Ash Disposal Sites TC4327237.23s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VA COAL ASH VA Financial Assurance LEAD SMELTERS US AIRS EPA WATCH LIST US FIN ASSUR COAL ASH EPA PCB TRANSFORMER COAL ASH DOE 2020 COR ACTION PRP Coal Ash Disposal Sites Financial Assurance Information Listing Lead Smelter Sites Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem EPA WATCH LIST Financial Assurance Information Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB Transformer Registration Database Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data 2020 Corrective Action Program List Potentially Responsible Parties EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR US Hist Auto Stat EDR US Hist Cleaners EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives KY RGA LF KY RGA HWS VA RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Records of Emergency Release Reports KY SPILLS: A listing of spill and/or release related incidents. A review of the KY SPILLS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/05/2015 has revealed that there is 1 KY SPILLS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation ____________________ Not reported Facility Status: Env. Closed Inc ID: 211630 Address ________ Direction / Distance ___________________ Map _____ID Page _____ NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.125 mi.) 5 9 TC4327237.23s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Other Ascertainable Records US MINES: Mines Master Index File. The source of this database is the Dept. of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration. A review of the US MINES list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/30/2014 has revealed that there are 8 US MINES sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ Address ________ PHILLIPS CREEK COAL Lower Elevation ____________________ FREEMAN FUELS OF KY BLUEGRASS AUGERS INC M & N CONSTRUCTION C FREEMAN FUELS OF KY BLUE GRASS AUGERS IN A & T AUGERING INC FREEMAN FUELS OF KY Address ________ Direction / Distance ___________________ Map _____ID Page _____ SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.372 mi.) 9 11 Direction / Distance ___________________ Map ID _____ Page _____ 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.273 mi.) WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.273 mi.) WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.273 mi.) A1 A2 3 A4 B6 B7 B8 8 8 8 9 10 10 10 TC4327237.23s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 3 records. Site Name ____________ Database(s) ____________ DOT PARCEL 127 DOT US 119 - LETCHER CO KY SB193 KY SB193 KY SWF/LF TC4327237.23s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 EDR Inc. EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Database Search Distance (Miles) Target Property >1 Total Plotted < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 NR 0 0 NR 0 0 0 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.750 0.750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0.750 0.750 0.750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL Proposed NPL NPL LIENS 1.250 1.250 0.250 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS FEDERAL FACILITY Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP 0.750 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.250 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.750 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA-SQG RCRA-CESQG 0.500 0.500 0.500 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS US INST CONTROL LUCIS Federal ERNS list ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS KY SHWS VA SHWS 1.250 1.250 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists KY SWF/LF VA SWF/LF 0.750 0.750 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists KY SB193 KY PSTEAF 0.750 0.750 TC4327237.23s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Database Search Distance (Miles) INDIAN LUST 0.750 Target Property >1 Total Plotted < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0.250 0.250 0.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 1 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists KY UST VA UST INDIAN UST FEMA UST 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries KY ENG CONTROLS VA ENG CONTROLS KY INST CONTROL VA INST CONTROL 0.500 0.500 0.750 0.750 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites KY VCP VA VCP INDIAN VCP 0.750 0.750 0.750 State and tribal Brownfields sites VA BROWNFIELDS KY BROWNFIELDS 0.750 0.750 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.750 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9 ODI KY HIST LF KY SWRCY INDIAN ODI 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL KY CDL US HIST CDL Local Land Records LIENS 2 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS KY SPILLS VA SPILLS 0.250 0.250 0.250 TC4327237.23s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Database Search Distance (Miles) Target Property >1 Total Plotted < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 4 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR DOT OPS DOD FUDS CONSENT ROD UMTRA US MINES TRIS TSCA FTTS HIST FTTS SSTS ICIS PADS MLTS RADINFO FINDS RAATS RMP KY UIC VA UIC KY DRYCLEANERS VA DRYCLEANERS KY NPDES VA NPDES KY AIRS VA AIRS KY LEAD INDIAN RESERV SCRD DRYCLEANERS KY Financial Assurance KY COAL ASH VA COAL ASH VA Financial Assurance LEAD SMELTERS US AIRS EPA WATCH LIST US FIN ASSUR COAL ASH EPA PCB TRANSFORMER COAL ASH DOE 2020 COR ACTION PRP 0.500 0.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 0.750 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 1.250 0.750 0.250 0.750 0.750 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.750 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.250 TC4327237.23s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Database Search Distance (Miles) EDR US Hist Auto Stat EDR US Hist Cleaners 0.500 0.500 Target Property >1 Total Plotted < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 4 0 0 9 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives KY RGA LF KY RGA HWS VA RGA LF - Totals -- 0.250 0.250 0.250 0 4 1 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC4327237.23s Page 7 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site A1 FREEMAN FUELS OF KY INC < 1/8 1 ft. LETCHER (County), KY Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number US MINES 1016483390 N/A US MINES 1011164357 N/A US MINES 1011165531 N/A Site 1 of 3 in cluster A Relative: Lower Actual: 1730 ft. US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: A2 BLUEGRASS AUGERS INC < 1/8 1 ft. LETCHER (County), KY 1515793 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 MOUNTAIN TOP #2 FREEMAN FUELS OF KY INC D 19910630 Coal Mining 0 0 37 08 35 082 41 30 Site 2 of 3 in cluster A Relative: Lower Actual: 1746 ft. US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1513686 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 1 SURFACE BLUEGRASS AUGERS INC D 19820901 Coal Mining 0 0 37 08 35 082 41 30 3 M & N CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC < 1/8 1 ft. LETCHER (County), KY Relative: Lower Actual: 1592 ft. US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1514861 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 1 SURFACE M & N CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC D 19860301 Coal Mining 0 0 37 08 51 082 41 57 TC4327237.23s Page 8 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site A4 FREEMAN FUELS OF KY INC < 1/8 1 ft. PIKE (County), KY Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number US MINES 1016151752 N/A KY SPILLS S117104069 N/A Site 3 of 3 in cluster A Relative: Lower Actual: 1730 ft. 5 NE 1/8-1/4 0.125 mi. 661 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1392 ft. US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1516506 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 STRIP AND AUGER #1 FREEMAN FUELS OF KY INC D 19920330 Coal Mining 0 0 37 21 13 082 37 09 LETCHER (County), KY SPILLS: Facility Status: Incident Type: Program Code: Received By Staff: Received Date: Report Date: Dispatch Description: Source Name: Source Address: Substances: Other Substances Desc: Media Impacted: Inc ID: Lead Invest Person ID: Compliance: Notification: Priority: Incident End Date: Follow Up Priority Desc: Most Recent Comp Eval Activity: Most Recent ENF Activity: Begin Emergency Date: End Emergency Date: MARS Function Code: Locked: Closure Type Desc: Latitude: Longitude: Env. Closed AIR RELEASE, FUGITIVE EMISSIONS Not reported McCune, Rich 09/02/2006 8/2/06 12:27 Coal truck traffic is causing excessive amounts of dust. "This dust is killing us." Not reported Off of Highway 119 halfway between Jenkins and Whitesburg in Bill Lewis Hollow in Letcher Co. Not reported Not reported Air 211630 7112 Yes No Routine 9/27/2006 12:00:00 AM Routine Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 82.689372 -37.149764 TC4327237.23s Page 9 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation B6 WSW 1/4-1/2 0.273 mi. 1442 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1607 ft. MAP FINDINGS Site BLUE GRASS AUGERS INC US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: Relative: Lower US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: Relative: Lower Actual: 1607 ft. US MINES 1011167207 N/A US MINES 1011167195 N/A US MINES 1016483547 N/A Site 1 of 3 in cluster B A & T AUGERING INC B8 WSW 1/4-1/2 0.273 mi. 1443 ft. EDR ID Number EPA ID Number LETCHER (County), KY B7 WSW 1/4-1/2 0.273 mi. 1442 ft. Actual: 1607 ft. Database(s) 1516550 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 BLUEGRASS #1 BLUE GRASS AUGERS INC D 19891102 Coal Mining 0 0 37 08 16 082 42 29 LETCHER (County), KY Site 2 of 3 in cluster B 1516538 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 1 AUGER A & T AUGERING INC D 19930512 Coal Mining 0 0 37 08 16 082 42 29 FREEMAN FUELS OF KY INC LETCHER (County), KY Site 3 of 3 in cluster B US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1516496 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 2 STRIP AND AUGER FREEMAN FUELS OF KY INC D 19910123 Coal Mining 0 0 37 08 16 082 42 29 TC4327237.23s Page 10 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 9 SE 1/4-1/2 0.372 mi. 1965 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 2813 ft. MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) PHILLIPS CREEK COAL COMPANY US MINES EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1011237978 N/A WISE (County), VA US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 4405157 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 1 PHILLIPS CREEK COAL COMPANY D 19811218 Coal Mining 0 0 37 07 45 082 41 09 TC4327237.23s Page 11 Count: 3 records. ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s) ERMINE PAYNE GAP WHITESBURG S106987675 S106855020 S109843222 DOT PARCEL 127 DOT US 119 - LETCHER CO US 119 US 23 AT HWY 119 US 119 41858 41537 41858 KY SB193 KY SB193 KY SWF/LF TC4327237.23s Page 12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 Telephone 312-886-6686 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4327237.23s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC4327237.23s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.23s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS KY SHWS: State Leads List State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 03/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4327237.23s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING VA SHWS: This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: 0 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4236 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists KY SWF/LF: Solid Waste Facilities List Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/23/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually VA SWF/LF: Solid Waste Management Facilities Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 04/17/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4238 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists KY SB193: SB193 Branch Site Inventory List The inventory indicates facilities that have performed permanent closure activities at a regulated underground storage tank facility and have known soil and/or groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: 09/05/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2006 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-5981 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned KY PSTEAF: Facility Ranking List The Underground Storage Tank Branch (USTB) has ranked all PSTEAF reimbursable facilities requiring corrective action, in accordance with 401 KAR 42:290. Directive letters will be issued on the basis of facility ranking and available PSTEAF funding in sequential order as ranked. For example, Rank 2 facilities will be issued directives before Rank 3 facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-5981 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4327237.23s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 01/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 01/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 184 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.23s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists KY UST: Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 02/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/04/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-5981 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly VA UST: Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4010 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12/14/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 271 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.23s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/29/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries TC4327237.23s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING KY ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Site Listing A listing of sites that use engineering controls. Date of Government Version: 03/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VA ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites Listing A listing of sites with Engineering Controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4228 Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KY INST CONTROL: State Superfund Database A list of closed sites in the State Superfund Database. Institutional controls would be in place at any site that uses Contained or Managed as a Closure Option. Date of Government Version: 03/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VA INST CONTROL: Voluntary Remediation Program Database Sites included in the Voluntary Remediation Program database that have deed restrictions. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4228 Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites KY VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites Sites that have been accepted into the Voluntary Cleanup Program or have submitted an application. Date of Government Version: 03/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VA VRP: Voluntary Remediation Program The Voluntary Cleanup Program encourages owners of elected contaminated sites to take the initiative and conduct voluntary cleanups that meet state environmental standards. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4228 Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4327237.23s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 04/02/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites VA BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Site Specific Assessments To qualify for Brownfields Assessment, the site must meet the Federal definition of a Brownfields and should have contaminant issues that need to be addressed and a redevelopment plan supported by the local government and community. Virginia’s Department of Environmental Quality performs brownfields assessments under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at no cost to communities, property owners or, prospective purchasers. The assessment is an evaluation of environmental impacts caused by previous site uses similar to a Phase II Environmental Assessment. Date of Government Version: 04/29/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4207 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies KY BROWNFIELDS: Kentucky Brownfield Inventory The Kentucky Brownfield Program has created an inventory of brownfield sites in order to market the properties to those interested in brownfield redevelopment. The Kentucky Brownfield Program is working to promote the redevelopment of these sites by helping to remove barriers that prevent reuse, providing useful information to communities, developers and the public and encouraging a climate that fosters redevelopment of contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 05/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Division of Compliance Assistance Telephone: 502-564-0323 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. TC4327237.23s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned KY HIST LF: Historical Landfills This solid waste facility listing contains detail information that is not included in the landfill listing. A listing with detail information is no longer available by the Department of Environmental Protection. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2006 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned KY SWRCY: Recycling Facilities A listing of recycling facilities located in the state of Kentucky. Date of Government Version: 04/07/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. TC4327237.23s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KY CDL: Clandestine Drub Lab Location Listing Clandestine drug lab site locations. Date of Government Version: 03/24/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually KY SPILLS: State spills A listing of spill and/or release related incidents. Date of Government Version: 05/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: DEP, Emergency Response Telephone: 502-564-2380 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.23s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING VA SPILLS WC: Prep Database The Department of Environmental Quality’s POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/30/2009 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, West Central Region Telephone: 540-562-6700 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned VA SPILLS: Prep/Spills Database Listing The Department of Environmental Quality’s POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. PREP staff often work to assist local emergency responders, other state agencies, federal agencies, and responsible parties, as may be needed, to manage pollution incidents. Oil spills, fish kills, and hazardous materials spills are examples of incidents that may involve the DEQ’s PREP Program. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4287 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VA SPILLS BRL: Prep/Spills Database Listing A listing of spills locations located in the Blue Ridge Regional area, Lynchburg. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/18/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2009 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: DEQ, Blue Ridge Regional Office Telephone: 434-582-6218 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies VA SPILLS PC: Pollution Complaint Database Pollution Complaints Database. The pollution reports contained in the PC database include the initial release reporting of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks and all other releases of petroleum to the environment as well as releases to state waters. The database is current through 12/1/93. Since that time, all spill and pollution reporting information has been collected and tracked through the DEQ regional offices. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1996 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/1996 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/1996 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4287 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned VA SPILLS NO: PREP Database The Department of Environmental Quality’s POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 09/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/30/2009 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Northern Region Telephone: 703-583-3864 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned VA SPILLS PD: PREP Database The Department of Environmental Quality’s POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 10/20/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Piedmont Region Telephone: 804-527-5020 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4327237.23s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING VA SPILLS SW: Reportable Spills The Department of Environmental Quality’s POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2010 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Southwest Region Telephone: 276-676-4839 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned VA SPILLS TD: PREP Database The Department of Environmental Quality’s POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 09/17/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Tidewater Region Telephone: trofoia@deq.vir Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly VA SPILLS VA: PREP Database The Department of Environmental Quality’s POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2012 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Valley Regional Office Telephone: 540-574-7800 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/19/2013 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC4327237.23s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 110 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4327237.23s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4327237.23s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 04/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). TC4327237.23s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Telephone: (404) 562-9900 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Biennially KY UIC: UIC Information A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the Kentucky Oil & Gas Wells data base. Date of Government Version: 04/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Kentucky Geological Survey Telephone: 859-323-0544 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly VA UIC: Underground Injection Control Wells A listing of underground injection controls wells. TC4327237.23s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy Telephone: 276-415-9700 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies KY DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations. Date of Government Version: 11/26/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2014 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-573-3382 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VA DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner List A listing of registered drycleaners. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4407 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies KY NPDES: Permitted Facility Listing A listing of permitted wastewater facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-3410 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VA CEDS: Comprehensive Environmental Data System Virginia Water Protection Permits, Virginia Pollution Discharge System (point discharge) permits and Virginia Pollution Abatement (no point discharge) permits. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4077 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually KY AIRS: Permitted Airs Facility Listing A listing of permitted Airs facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-573-3382 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VA AIRS: Permitted Airs Facility List A listing of permitted Airs facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4000 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.23s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING KY LEAD: Environmental Lead Program Report Tracking Database Lead Report Tracking Database Date of Government Version: 08/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2014 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 502-564-4537 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies KY Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information. Date of Government Version: 04/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies KY Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-5981 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies KY COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites A listing of coal ash pond site locations. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.23s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING KY Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VA Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information listing Solid waste financial assurance information. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4123 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. TC4327237.23s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. TC4327237.23s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: N/A VA Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 02/12/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4205 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually VA COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites A listing of facilities with coal ash impoundments. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 804-698-4285 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4327237.23s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives KY RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014 Number of Days to Update: 186 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies KY RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2014 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies VA RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Quality in Virgina. TC4327237.23s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 203 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2014 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4327237.23s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Certified Child Care Homes Source: Cabinet for Families & Children Telephone: 502-564-7130 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Polygon Features Source: Environmental Protection & Public Protection Cabinet Telephone: 502-564-5174 Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. TC4327237.23s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4327237.23s Page GR-27 GEOCHECK ®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS PAYNES GAP 199 COUNTY ROAD 1417 MAYKING, KY 41837 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 37.1421 - 37˚ 8’ 31.56’’ 82.6972 - 82˚ 41’ 49.92’’ Zone 17 349261.6 4111780.8 1849 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Most Recent Revision: 37082-B6 JENKINS WEST, KY VA 1992 EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC4327237.23s Page A-1 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General NW Elevation (ft) 2851 North 2990 1861 1859 1849 1758 1610 1445 1348 1517 1683 1757 1590 1810 2091 2278 2532 2755 3003 SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES South 1897 1919 1954 West 1757 1718 1768 1669 1747 1744 1849 1701 1529 1465 1479 1482 1661 1614 1589 1698 Elevation (ft) TP East TP ✩ Target Property Elevation: 1849 ft. 0 1/2 1 Miles Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC4327237.23s Page A-2 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map Target Property County LETCHER, KY Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: 21133C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data Additional Panels in search area: 51195C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map NWI Quad at Target Property JENKINS WEST HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. MAP ID Not Reported LOCATION FROM TP GENERAL DIRECTION GROUNDWATER FLOW TC4327237.23s Page A-3 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT Era: System: Series: Code: GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Paleozoic Category: Pennsylvanian Atokan and Morrowan Series PP1 (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Stratifed Sequence Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). TC4327237.23s Page A-4 2 2 1 4 3 1 3 2 2 2 0 EDR Inc. 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: Dekalb Soil Surface Texture: channery sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 64 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group 1 0 inches 1 inches channery sandy loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. 2 1 inches 25 inches very channery sandy loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. Unified Soil FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), Lean Clay. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), Lean Clay. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) Max: 141 Min: 42 Max: 5.5 Min: 3.6 Max: 141 Min: 42 Max: 5.5 Min: 3.6 TC4327237.23s Page A-6 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Layer Upper Lower 3 25 inches 29 inches Classification Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group unweathered bedrock Not reported Unified Soil Not reported Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) Max: Min: Max: Min: Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name: Kimper Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group 1 0 inches 5 inches silt loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. 2 5 inches 61 inches silt loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Clayey Soils. Unified Soil COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Clayey sand. COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Silty Sand. COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Clayey sand. Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 7.3 Min: 5.1 Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 6 Min: 4.5 TC4327237.23s Page A-7 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Layer Upper Lower 3 61 inches 79 inches Classification Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group very channery loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. Unified Soil COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Clayey sand. Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 6 Min: 4.5 Soil Map ID: 3 Soil Component Name: Kaymine Soil Surface Texture: channery silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group 1 0 inches 14 inches channery silt loam 2 14 inches 79 inches very channery silt loam Granular materials (35 pct. or less passing No. 200), Silty, or Clayey Gravel and Sand. Granular materials (35 pct. or less passing No. 200), Silty, or Clayey Gravel and Sand. Unified Soil Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Gravels, Gravels with fines, Clayey Gravel Max: 42 Min: 4 Max: 7.8 Min: 5.6 COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Gravels, Gravels with fines, Clayey Gravel Max: 42 Min: 4 Max: 7.8 Min: 5.6 TC4327237.23s Page A-8 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Map ID: 4 Soil Component Name: Shelocta Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group 1 0 inches 3 inches silt loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. 2 3 inches 27 inches silt loam 3 27 inches 55 inches very channery silt loam 4 55 inches 66 inches weathered bedrock Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Clayey Soils. Not reported Unified Soil Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), Lean Clay. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), Lean Clay Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 6.5 Min: 4.5 Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 5.5 Min: 4.5 COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Gravels, Gravels with fines, Clayey Gravel Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 5.5 Min: 4.5 Not reported Max: Min: Max: Min: TC4327237.23s Page A-9 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) Federal USGS Federal FRDS PWS State Database 1.000 Nearest PWS within 1 mile 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION MAP ID E21 G30 WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP USGS40000380388 USGS40000380432 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION MAP ID 1 2 A3 B4 B5 C6 A7 C8 D9 D10 C11 12 13 14 D15 D16 E17 18 19 WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP KY5000000025103 KY5000000025162 KY5000000024909 KY5000000024803 KY5000000024771 KY5000000025185 KY5000000024942 KY5000000025244 KY5000000025033 KY5000000024992 KY5000000025247 KY5000000025269 KY5000000025234 KY5000000025265 KY5000000025059 KY5000000025073 KY5000000025150 KY5000000024690 KY5000000024962 1/4 - 1/2 Mile North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile West 1/2 - 1 Mile West 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile North 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile North 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile West 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW TC4327237.23s Page A-10 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION MAP ID E20 E22 23 24 25 F26 F27 G28 G29 F31 32 WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP KY5000000025187 KY5000000025186 KY5000000025317 KY5000000025466 KY5000000025178 KY5000000025430 KY5000000025467 KY5000000025486 KY5000000025487 KY5000000025485 KY5000000024560 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION MAP ID A1 A2 3 4 B5 B6 7 8 C9 C10 11 D12 D13 WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP KYOG11000120393 KYOG11000120394 KYOG11000105654 KYOG11000105748 KYOG11000119988 KYOG11000119989 KYOG11000091067 KYOG11000012178 KYOG11000121034 KYOG11000121035 KYOG11000091066 KYOG11000121777 KYOG11000121778 1/8 - 1/4 Mile NNE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile NE 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE TC4327237.23s Page A-11 60 80 16 1 60 0 1 11 1 6 1 87 7 6 62 084 00 0 00 1 8 7 1 96 0 2 2 54 4 0 2 6 0 20 0 2 6 4 0 40 27 6 7 28 0 0 2 7 20 6 8 0 8 880 1 2 6 8 0 2 2 2 032 2 0 3 6 0 4 00 60 25 20 0 5 2 4 8 40 2 4 2 4 00 0 2 36 2 2 0 32 2 0 22 22 0 2 2 6 2 5 60 0 0 4 2 2 2 82 0 24 0 2 2 010 2 61 2 8 2 5 6 0 2 60 2 6 0 4 0 2 7 6 0 8 1 7 6 0 1 8 0 0 18 00 1 16 64 00 0 1 8 2 00 1 81 8 1 8 8 04 0 0 0 2 2 7 8 02 0 00 3 0 2 9 2 90 0 20 1 5 2 0 18 00 48 15 0 6 1 5 2 0 19 2 0 4 2 06 0 0 00 80 40 30 3 0 4 0 00 2 9 6 0 1 6 0 0 1 5 52 1 50 6 16 0 1 14 0 6 14 1 71 6 6 80 0 1 840 1 40 1 24 2 4 6 5 2 80 0 00 2 22 8 7 6 3 02 29 92 8 8 40 00 40 2 0 8 0 0 3 04 800 2 9 2 8 2 0 8 4 08 0 11 1 8 8 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 8 0 22 0 0 111 9 89 8 1 800 68 1 7 0 60 1 6 4 0 1 11 1 13 464 4 4 8 0 00 0 0 80 15 21 05 1 6 1 46 0 1 1 6 0 1 6 86 04 0 0 1 6 8 0 19 4 00 60 0 22 1 5 6 0 1 6 4 0 48 0 18 1 9 40 1 52 0 1 4 00 0 11 44 1 5 6 0 1 55 24 8 6 00 0 1 16 1 40 5 5 1 64 20 0 6 3 20 0 1 6 8 0 1 6 4 0 1 13 3 2 1 24 0 0 0 11 4 44 17 20 1 7 60 1 800 8 60 0 0 60 7 1 5 2 1 3 1 4 60 00 1 1 61 06 40 0 16 80 1 41 44 08 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 0 0 1 880 1 800 1 6 40 1 6 1 7 2 80 0 5 1 9 6 0 80 24 KY 0 2 4 4 8 0 2 4 20 2 40 2 3 2 60 2 5 2 0 0 22 2 7 80 2 64 0 2 6 2 22 5 22 5 62 00 22 66 0 0 22 7 76 284 00 2 2 8 8 8 06 0 0 8 40 0 0 2 00 28 2 26 30 2 03 0 24 402 5 2 0 1 8 2 2 84 0 6 27 0 24 0 2 6 0 60 2 5 80 2 5 6 0 29 2 28 0 80 80 80 60 25 2 6 25 00 26 40 2 0 2 5 2 4 24 04 0 0 2 3 2 2 60 8 2 6 0 2 7 2 2 20 2 5 0 80 60 2 72 26 6 70 2 0 60 40 0 28 00 0 64 2 7 2 0 2 2 7 2 68 20 6 0 4 2 60 00 20 1 7 2 24 0 2 8 2 960 2 2 20 2 52 5 2 2 7 0 2 7 62 0 2 6 80 6 0 2 7 8 80 7 20 2 1 6 0 02 2 22 202 4222083 02 2 4 30 6 00 0 2 48 0 2 4 0 25 2 0 20 25 0 00 3 03 40 28 2 8 40 00 3 80 0 0 3 60 2 8 0 0 2 2 77 2 60 2 80 4 2 4 00 00 2 2 2 7 20 40 24 6 0 2 5 4 0 0 0 26 68 0 0 0 80 6 0 2 2 4 2 20 2 4 2 60 0 0 21 0 2 7 22 88 4 0 0 0 0 6 2 7 2 2 02 3 5 2 92 2 2 3 2 9 6 0 5 60 00 80 2 28 60 2 2 2 0 24 2 0 2 6 2 2 24 4 0 2 8 8 40 4 0 30 8 2 60 20 60 31 0 0 08 0 2 7 0 4 33 00 3 6 8 09 2 0 0 8 8 2 2 2 28 0 9 6 65 0 22 66 8 2 9 60 EDR Inc. 00 0 0 0 22 0 4 0 8 0 18 00 1 9 2 0 600 0 1 9 2 22 8 1 8 8 0 18 4 0 1 8 00 0 10 7 6 72 60 00 0 1 18 8 4 98 2 1 0 2 6 4 2 6 20 05 6 0 0 0 20 0 68 760 1 1 7 8 00 1 1 7 6 0 20 2 22 33 26 00 0 1 51 66 0 0 2 6 8 0 9 20 8 0 1 08 1 8 40 18 0 6 0 1 7 1 0 9 1 1 9 60 2 0 4 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 6 2 4 0 0 82 00 1 0 0 2 0 22 1 2 0 0 48 222 44 84 0 2 22 2 6 00 0 5 0 20 2 32 4 2 6 00 2 26 64 00 0 0 26 0 0 4 4 0 2 4 8 0 2 92 29 06 33 30 4 0 0 1 16 20 0 2 00 2 0 4 0 22 0 8 0 0 0 2 1 60 0 1 2 0 2 2 2 2 42 2 8 0 2 3 22 03 6 0 0 84 0 0 18 0 1 8 8 1 20 0 00 1 6 20 0 1 17 7 6 1 7 2 0 60 1 6 4 10 6 8 0 1 7 2 0 1 0 15 6 1 64 00 0 1 68 0 1 76 2 0 1 40 16 1 4 20 1 9 00 0 8 1 68 0 1 6 00 1 4 8 0 1 5 2 0 1 5 60 16 2 10 8 40 2 8 0 0 1 8 4 0 1 8 0 0 1 0 1 66 48 0 1 1 1 17 6 40 1 6 160 1 0 1 71 72 06 0 0 1 7 2 1 71 6 2 0 40 18 1 6 8 0 8 0 2 05 6 0 14151 0 1 86 0 17 1 8 4 0 20 1 15 1 24 0 80 0 6 0 7 08 7 21 6 6 40 8 1 1 15 526 006 0 0 1 80 0 0 00 1 61 15 5 6 2 60 17 00 1 6 16 20 1 17 00 1 5 6 0 1 4 4 0 1 6 1 6 0 0 4 0 1 4 0 0 1 4 4 0 40 14 20 0 15 0 40 4 40 4 1 0 1 1 4 0 1 4 8 02 0 0 1 114 55 6 0 1 36 1 3 6 0 1 4 4 05 112 44 08 00 1 1 5 06 0 148 0 1 56 20 0 1 50 0 1 6 1 6 6 8 40 0 1 16 0 1 5 6 0 1 56 1 1 16 64 0 00 4 8 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 8 40 40 18 00 16 08 1 7 80 6 1 7 60 1 7 2 0 1 111677826 00 6 0 1 6 04 0 0 1 6 0 0 17 6 0 1 6 18 60 4 0 6 0 1 5 0 1 60 5 1 6 0 1 5 2 0 0 1 680 1 4 8 0 1 3 20 80 40 16 56 0 1 1 11 0 36 00 80 1 0 0 20 16 17 52 0 0 0 41 44 0 8 2480 15 1 14 8 0 00 6 60 15 62 0 21 0 0 4 011 7 1 7 8 06 4 1 6 10 0 6 1 60 1 50 2 5 1 14 4 1 40 1 7 2 0 6 1 17 76 1 6 20 0 80 2920 0 1 6 8 1 06 0 0 6 52 0 11 5 8 0 1 44 0 1 6 8 0 40 0 1 1 65 02 15 4 0 16 0 60 1 1 6 0 0 00 20 16 14 00 1 76 0 00 00 0 8 0 1 8 1 1 72 16 14 81 0 60 1 7 0 40 18 0 80 1 6 04 00 80 8 11 8 1 8 4 20 1 5 0 60 0 608 0 1 9 20 0 1 8 0 1 2 80 0 60 0 1 5 1 6 4 2 0 1 71 1 11 77 62 00 1 5 6 0 1 4 48 40 0 0 0 3 6 0 1 1 4 1 1 5 2 0 1 5 6 0 1 6 0 0 3 12 30 6 0 08 0 0 52 1 40 11 8 0 0 6 68 40 0 1 4 8 00 1 4 60 0 20 1 80 14 4 4 0 41 0 0 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database 1 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 233568 37.14788 -82.69682 00045519 Domestic KY5000000025103 Site type: Constructi: 2 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: A3 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: B4 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: B5 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Site type: Constructi: KY5000000024909 Water Well 02-OCT-99 KY WELLS 233543 37.14205 -82.70627 00031622 Domestic KY5000000024803 KY5000000025162 Water Well 08-APR-96 KY WELLS 312475 37.14399 -82.70593 00052568 Domestic KY5000000024909 KY5000000025103 Water Well 13-JUL-96 KY WELLS 267492 37.14899 -82.69849 00043617 Domestic KY5000000025162 EDR ID Number KY5000000024803 Water Well 07-DEC-93 KY WELLS KY5000000024771 TC4327237.23s Page A-13 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: 312768 37.14149 -82.70627 00053932 Domestic KY5000000024771 Site type: Constructi: C6 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 261962 37.14927 -82.69516 00057785 Domestic KY5000000025185 Site type: Constructi: A7 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: 250096 37.1448 -82.70605 00054838 Domestic KY5000000024942 Site type: Constructi: Site type: Constructi: D9 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: KY5000000025244 Water Well 01-SEP-92 KY WELLS 312769 37.14649 -82.70577 00053933 Domestic KY5000000025033 KY5000000024942 Water Well 01-JAN-00 KY WELLS 45002 37.15011 -82.69544 00029095 Domestic KY5000000025244 KY5000000025185 Water Well 28-JAN-02 KY WELLS C8 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Water Well 21-JUN-00 KY5000000025033 Water Well 24-JUN-00 TC4327237.23s Page A-14 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database D10 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 263455 37.14571 -82.70649 00057351 Domestic KY5000000024992 Site type: Constructi: C11 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: 12 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: 13 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: 14 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Site type: Constructi: KY5000000025269 Water Well 30-DEC-99 KY WELLS 250224 37.15011 -82.70043 00049773 Domestic KY5000000025234 KY5000000025247 Water Well 15-JAN-87 KY WELLS 73348 37.15038 -82.69571 Not Reported Domestic KY5000000025269 KY5000000024992 Water Well 29-APR-02 KY WELLS 31560 37.15011 -82.69432 00004249 Domestic KY5000000025247 EDR ID Number KY5000000025234 Water Well 13-JUN-98 KY WELLS KY5000000025265 TC4327237.23s Page A-15 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: 312757 37.15032 -82.69421 00053908 Domestic KY5000000025265 Site type: Constructi: D15 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 250097 37.14699 -82.70621 00050539 Domestic KY5000000025059 Site type: Constructi: D16 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: 250098 37.14732 -82.70605 00050536 Domestic KY5000000025073 Site type: Constructi: Site type: Constructi: 18 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: KY5000000025150 Water Well 01-JAN-86 KY WELLS 249487 37.14038 -82.70849 00048573 Domestic KY5000000024690 KY5000000025073 Water Well 01-MAY-73 KY WELLS 250349 37.14891 -82.70466 00050534 Domestic KY5000000025150 KY5000000025059 Water Well 01-JAN-00 KY WELLS E17 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Water Well 18-FEB-00 KY5000000024690 Water Well 19-SEP-97 TC4327237.23s Page A-16 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database 19 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 61095 37.1452 -82.70818 Not Reported Domestic KY5000000024962 Site type: Constructi: KY WELLS 73347 37.14955 -82.70515 Not Reported Domestic KY5000000025187 Site type: Constructi: FED USGS USGS-KY USGS Kentucky Water Science Center USGS-370858082421901 I29A0037 Well Not Reported 05100201 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Latitude: -82.7051575 Sourcemap scale: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: Interpolated from map NAD83 Vert measure val: feet Vertacc measure val: feet Interpolated from topographic map NGVD29 Countrycode: Not Reported Breathitt Formation Not Reported Not Reported Welldepth: ft Wellholedepth: ft KY5000000025187 Water Well 30-DEC-99 E21 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Huc code: Drainagearea Units: Contrib drainagearea units: Longitude: Horiz Acc measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: Aquifer type: Construction date: Welldepth units: Wellholedepth units: KY5000000024962 Water Well 30-DEC-99 E20 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: EDR ID Number USGS40000380388 Not Reported Not Reported 37.1495463 24000 seconds 1320.00 20 US 9 9 TC4327237.23s Page A-17 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel ------------------------------------------------1960-07-21 5.39 E22 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 316549 37.14955 -82.70516 Not Reported Unknown KY5000000025186 Site type: Constructi: 23 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: 24 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: 39540 37.15371 -82.70182 00018061 Domestic KY5000000025466 Site type: Constructi: Site type: Constructi: KY5000000025466 Water Well 07-SEP-90 KY WELLS 267893 37.14955 -82.7096 00058596 Domestic KY5000000025178 KY5000000025317 Water Well 09-AUG-91 KY WELLS 25 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Water Well 30-DEC-99 KY WELLS 41844 37.15122 -82.70544 00019270 Domestic KY5000000025317 KY5000000025186 KY5000000025178 Water Well 13-SEP-02 TC4327237.23s Page A-18 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database F26 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 33363 37.15316 -82.7046 00006625 Domestic KY5000000025430 Site type: Constructi: F27 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: G28 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: G29 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: G30 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Site type: Constructi: KY5000000025486 Water Well 30-DEC-99 KY WELLS 73352 37.15399 -82.70349 Not Reported Domestic KY5000000025487 KY5000000025467 Water Well 05-OCT-98 KY WELLS 316553 37.15399 -82.70349 Not Reported Unknown KY5000000025486 KY5000000025430 Water Well 11-NOV-87 KY WELLS 248649 37.15377 -82.70371 00050549 Domestic KY5000000025467 EDR ID Number KY5000000025487 Water Well 30-DEC-99 FED USGS USGS40000380432 TC4327237.23s Page A-19 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Org. Identifier: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Huc code: Drainagearea Units: Contrib drainagearea units: Longitude: Horiz Acc measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: Aquifer type: Construction date: Welldepth units: Wellholedepth units: USGS-KY USGS Kentucky Water Science Center USGS-370914082421301 I29A0045 Well Not Reported 05100201 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Latitude: -82.7034907 Sourcemap scale: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: Interpolated from map NAD83 Vert measure val: feet Vertacc measure val: feet Interpolated from topographic map NGVD29 Countrycode: Not Reported Breathitt Formation Not Reported Not Reported Welldepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 37.1539908 24000 seconds 1400.00 20 US Not Reported Not Reported Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 F31 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 243791 37.15399 -82.70377 Not Reported Domestic KY5000000025485 Site type: Constructi: 32 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Water Well 30-DEC-99 KY WELLS 35628 37.13788 -82.71377 00012573 Domestic KY5000000024560 Site type: Constructi: KY5000000025485 KY5000000024560 Water Well 23-AUG-88 TC4327237.23s Page A-20 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance A1 NNE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 16133017890000 H 9 N W JENKINS WEST EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY 569734 000 Not Reported TRM 30-DEC-99 Not Reported Not Reported 106534 H 37.14498 -82.69573 37.144985 -82.695729 EDR ID Number OIL_GAS KYOG11000120393 Kgs recno: Number : Fns: Few: Surf elev: County: 139017 82 1826 1245 1653 LETCHER Td: Deepst pay: Org wclass: Cmpl date: Plug afdvt: Cuttings: Plotsymbol: 0 341CLVD UNC 30-DEC-99 Not Reported 0 TRM Site id: KYOG11000120393 A2 NNE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: Database OIL_GAS 16133017900000 H 9 N W JENKINS WEST EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY 569733 000 Not Reported TRM 30-DEC-99 Not Reported Not Reported 106533 H 37.14505 -82.69574 37.145048 -82.695743 Kgs recno: Number : Fns: Few: Surf elev: County: 139018 82 1803 1241 1654 LETCHER Td: Deepst pay: Org wclass: Cmpl date: Plug afdvt: Cuttings: Plotsymbol: 0 341HURN UNC 30-DEC-99 Not Reported 0 TRM Site id: KYOG11000120394 KYOG11000120394 TC4327237.23s Page A-21 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance 3 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 4 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Database EDR ID Number OIL_GAS KYOG11000105654 16133006140000 Kgs recno: 123210 H Number : 82 8 Fns: 2518 N Few: 821 E Surf elev: 1630 JENKINS WEST County: LETCHER PIKE-LETCHER LAND COMPANY KINZER, J W 1115 Td: 4465 341OHIO Deepst pay: 340BBSI Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 22-OCT-01 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 FDC Plotsymbol: GAS 92316 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/3/R00123210/R00123210.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.143084 -82.702816 37.143186 -82.702696 Site id: KYOG11000105654 OIL_GAS KYOG11000105748 16133006150000 Kgs recno: 123304 H Number : 82 8 Fns: 1148 S Few: 184 E Surf elev: 2032 JENKINS WEST County: LETCHER PIKE-LETCHER LAND COMPANY KINZER, J W 1116 Td: 4856 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: EXT GAS Cmpl date: 27-OCT-01 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 FDC Plotsymbol: GAS 92317 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/3/R00123304/R00123304.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.136486 -82.700631 TC4327237.23s Page A-22 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 37.136588 -82.700511 Site id: B5 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: OIL_GAS 16133017360000 H 9 N E JENKINS WEST EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY 569297 000 Not Reported GAS 30-DEC-99 Not Reported Not Reported 106141 H 37.14544 -82.69011 37.145438 -82.690112 Kgs recno: Number : Fns: Few: Surf elev: County: 138478 82 1661 1976 1448 LETCHER Td: Deepst pay: Org wclass: Cmpl date: Plug afdvt: Cuttings: Plotsymbol: 4113 341HURN UNC 30-DEC-99 Not Reported 16168 GAS Site id: KYOG11000119988 B6 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: KYOG11000105748 OIL_GAS 16133017370000 H 9 N E JENKINS WEST EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY 569298 000 Not Reported GAS 30-DEC-99 Not Reported Not Reported 106142 H 37.14543 -82.69003 Kgs recno: Number : Fns: Few: Surf elev: County: 138479 82 1663 1951 1448 LETCHER Td: Deepst pay: Org wclass: Cmpl date: Plug afdvt: Cuttings: Plotsymbol: 3682 341CLVD UNC 30-DEC-99 Not Reported 0 GAS KYOG11000119988 KYOG11000119989 TC4327237.23s Page A-23 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 7 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 8 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.145433 -82.690026 Site id: KYOG11000119989 OIL_GAS KYOG11000091067 16133003960000 Kgs recno: 102990 H Number : 82 9 Fns: 1070 N Few: 1710 E Surf elev: 1633 JENKINS WEST County: LETCHER EREX (SAM WRIGHT) EQUITABLE RESOURCES EXPL, INC KF1977 Td: 3418 337BRDN Deepst pay: 332BIGL 70 MCFGPD Org wclass: DEV O&G Cmpl date: 26-MAR-91 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 644 DIL Plotsymbol: O&G 81334 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/0/2/R00102990/R00102990.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.147061 -82.689198 37.147163 -82.689077 Site id: KYOG11000091067 OIL_GAS KYOG11000012178 16133008090000 Kgs recno: 12421 H Number : 82 8 Fns: 1050 N Few: 2375 W Surf elev: 1587 JENKINS WEST County: LETCHER ELKHORN COAL CO, INC KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA GAS CO 1743 Td: 4399 344CORN Deepst pay: 000 Not Reported Org wclass: DEV D&A Cmpl date: 23-DEC-80 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: PA Not Reported Cuttings: 14306 FDC Plotsymbol: D&A 37657 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/0/1/2/R00012421/R00012421.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.147116 -82.708519 TC4327237.23s Page A-24 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 37.147218 -82.708399 Site id: C9 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: OIL_GAS 16133018400000 H 9 N E JENKINS WEST EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY 570817 000 Not Reported TRM 30-DEC-99 Not Reported Not Reported 107183 H 37.14715 -82.68517 37.147155 -82.685165 Kgs recno: Number : Fns: Few: Surf elev: County: 139658 82 1036 534 1016 LETCHER Td: Deepst pay: Org wclass: Cmpl date: Plug afdvt: Cuttings: Plotsymbol: 0 000 UNC 30-DEC-99 Not Reported 0 TRM Site id: KYOG11000121034 C10 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: KYOG11000012178 OIL_GAS 16133018410000 H 9 N E JENKINS WEST EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY 570818 000 Not Reported TRM 30-DEC-99 Not Reported Not Reported 107184 H 37.14717 -82.68509 Kgs recno: Number : Fns: Few: Surf elev: County: 139659 82 1031 512 1611 LETCHER Td: Deepst pay: Org wclass: Cmpl date: Plug afdvt: Cuttings: Plotsymbol: 0 000 UNC 30-DEC-99 Not Reported 0 TRM KYOG11000121034 KYOG11000121035 TC4327237.23s Page A-25 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 37.147168 -82.68509 Site id: 11 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: OIL_GAS KYOG11000091066 16133003950000 Kgs recno: 102989 H Number : 82 2 Fns: 1025 S Few: 2220 E Surf elev: 1629 JENKINS WEST County: LETCHER EREX (SAM WRIGHT) EQUITABLE RESOURCES EXPL, INC KF1976 Td: 3352 337BRDN Deepst pay: 332BIGL 762 MCFGPD Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 10-MAY-91 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 647 DIL Plotsymbol: GAS 81333 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/0/2/R00102989/R00102989.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.152815 -82.69095 37.152917 -82.690829 Site id: KYOG11000091066 D12 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: KYOG11000121035 OIL_GAS 16133018600000 H 10 N W JENKINS WEST EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY 570820 341HURNL Not Reported GAS 30-DEC-99 Not Reported Not Reported 107419 H 37.14835 -82.68132 Kgs recno: Number : Fns: Few: Surf elev: County: 140440 82 600 588 1841 LETCHER Td: Deepst pay: Org wclass: Cmpl date: Plug afdvt: Cuttings: Plotsymbol: 9615 000 DEV 31-JAN-11 Not Reported 16241 GAS KYOG11000121777 TC4327237.23s Page A-26 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 37.148352 -82.681316 Site id: D13 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: KYOG11000121777 OIL_GAS 16133018610000 H 10 N W JENKINS WEST EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY 570819 341CLVD Not Reported GAS 30-DEC-99 Not Reported Not Reported 107418 H 37.14836 -82.68137 37.148462 -82.681249 Kgs recno: Number : Fns: Few: Surf elev: County: 140441 82 597 572 1842 LETCHER Td: Deepst pay: Org wclass: Cmpl date: Plug afdvt: Cuttings: Plotsymbol: 9337 000 DEV 31-JAN-11 Not Reported 16236 GAS Site id: KYOG11000121778 KYOG11000121778 TC4327237.23s Page A-27 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION Federal EPA Radon Zone for LETCHER County: 2 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for LETCHER COUNTY, KY Number of sites tested: 2 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L Living Area - 1st Floor Living Area - 2nd Floor Basement 0.900 pCi/L Not Reported 2.400 pCi/L 100% Not Reported 100% 0% Not Reported 0% 0% Not Reported 0% TC4327237.23s Page A-28 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Polygon Features Source: Environmental Protection & Public Protection Cabinet Telephone: 502-564-5174 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW R Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4327237.23s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Kentucky Water Well Records Database Source: Kentucky Geological Survey Telephone: 859-257-5500 Water Wells in Kentucky. Data from the Kentucky Ground Water Data Repository. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Kentucky Geological Survey Telephone: 859-257-5500 Oil and gas well locations in the state of Kentucky RADON State Database: KY Radon Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 502-564-4856 Radon Test Results Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey TC4327237.23s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4327237.23s Page PSGR-3 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA Appendix D: Topographic Maps October 2015 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Paynes Gap 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 Inquiry Number: 4327237.25 June 16, 2015 EDR Historical Topographic Map Report EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Historical Topographic Map → N TARGET QUAD NAME: POUND MAP YEAR: 1914 SERIES: SCALE: 15 1:62500 SITE NAME: Paynes Gap ADDRESS: 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 LAT/LONG: 37.1421 / -82.6972 CLIENT: Cardno TEC CONTACT: Erika Fuery INQUIRY#: 4327237.25 RESEARCH DATE: 06/16/2015 Historical Topographic Map → N TARGET QUAD NAME: JENKINS WEST MAP YEAR: 1954 SERIES: SCALE: 7.5 1:24000 SITE NAME: Paynes Gap ADDRESS: 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 LAT/LONG: 37.1421 / -82.6972 CLIENT: Cardno TEC CONTACT: Erika Fuery INQUIRY#: 4327237.25 RESEARCH DATE: 06/16/2015 Historical Topographic Map → N TARGET QUAD NAME: JENKINS WEST MAP YEAR: 1979 PHOTOREVISED FROM :1954 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 SITE NAME: Paynes Gap ADDRESS: 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 LAT/LONG: 37.1421 / -82.6972 CLIENT: Cardno TEC CONTACT: Erika Fuery INQUIRY#: 4327237.25 RESEARCH DATE: 06/16/2015 Historical Topographic Map → N TARGET QUAD NAME: JENKINS WEST MAP YEAR: 1992 SERIES: SCALE: 7.5 1:24000 SITE NAME: Paynes Gap ADDRESS: 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 LAT/LONG: 37.1421 / -82.6972 CLIENT: Cardno TEC CONTACT: Erika Fuery INQUIRY#: 4327237.25 RESEARCH DATE: 06/16/2015 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA Appendix E: Aerial Photographs October 2015 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Paynes Gap 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 Inquiry Number: 4327237.34 June 23, 2015 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: Aerial PhotographyJune 23, 2015 Target Property: 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 Year Scale Details Source 1952 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: April 08, 1952 EDR 1952 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: April 08, 1952 EDR 1952 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: April 08, 1952 EDR 1961 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: April 19, 1961 EDR 1961 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: April 19, 1961 EDR 1975 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Flight Date: May 01, 1975 EDR 1975 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Flight Date: May 01, 1975 EDR 1979 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Flight Date: December 04, 1979 EDR 1979 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Flight Date: December 04, 1979 EDR 1988 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: March 28, 1988 EDR 1988 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: March 28, 1988 EDR 1988 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: March 28, 1988 EDR 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: March 24, 1995 EDR 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: March 24, 1995 EDR 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: March 24, 1995 EDR 2000 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: April 05, 2000 USGS/DOQQ 2000 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: April 05, 2000 USGS/DOQQ 2000 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: April 05, 2000 USGS/DOQQ 2000 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: April 05, 2000 USGS/DOQQ 4327237.34 2 Year Scale Details Source 2000 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: April 05, 2000 USGS/DOQQ 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2009 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2009 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2009 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2009 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2009 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2011 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2011 USDA/NAIP 2011 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2011 USDA/NAIP 4327237.34 3 Year Scale Details Source 2011 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2011 USDA/NAIP 2011 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2011 USDA/NAIP 2011 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2011 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 4327237.34 4 INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1952 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1952 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1952 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1961 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1961 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1975 = 1000' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1975 = 1000' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1979 = 1000' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1979 = 1000' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1988 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1988 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1988 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1995 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1995 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 1995 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2000 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2000 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2000 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2000 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2000 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2005 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2005 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2005 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2005 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2005 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2009 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2009 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2009 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2009 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2009 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2011 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2011 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2011 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2011 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2011 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2012 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2012 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2012 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2012 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.34 2012 = 500' Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix F: City Directories Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Paynes Gap 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 Inquiry Number: 4327237.27 June 17, 2015 The EDR-City Directory Image Report Environmental Data Resources Inc 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year 2013 2008 2003 1999 1995 1992 Target Street ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ Cross Street þ þ þ þ ¨ ¨ Source Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Cole Information Services RECORD SOURCES EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. 4327237- 27 Page 1 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET 199 County Road 1417 Mayking, KY 41837 Year CD Image Source COUNTY RD 1417 2013 - Cole Information Services Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 2008 - Cole Information Services Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 2003 - Cole Information Services Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1999 - Cole Information Services Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1995 - Cole Information Services Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1992 - Cole Information Services Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 4327237- 27 Page 2 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS Year CD Image Source HIGHWAY 119 N 2013 pg. A2 Cole Information Services 2008 pg. A4 Cole Information Services 2003 pg. A6 Cole Information Services 1999 pg. A7 Cole Information Services 1995 - Cole Information Services Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1992 - Cole Information Services Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 4327237- 27 Page 3 City Directory Images Target Street - Cross Street HIGHWAY 119 N 3397 3406 3433 3441 3729 3886 4150 4675 4686 6594 6749 6785 6983 7112 7246 7247 7294 7316 7318 7320 7332 7360 7368 7370 7376 7378 7398 7400 7541 7569 7641 7759 7860 7869 7876 7915 7937 7959 7979 7993 8005 8041 8043 8059 8109 8137 8155 8171 8257 Source Cole Information Services 2013 WHITESBURG POST OFFICE PRECISION INCORPORATED DOLLAR GENERAL STORE STANDARD LABORATORIES WALTER ALLEN H BOLLING CHESTER ADAMS MELISSA SMITH GORDON WEBB HOPE WHITE MARK WRIGHT EDWARD WRIGHT CHARLES ENGLE JOSH YONTS CORA STURGILL ANDREA POTTER OCCUPANT UNKNOWN JERRY WALKER ALISON BROWN RACHEL DYER CHARLES KILGORE PAM SPANGLER OCCUPANT UNKNOWN BRIAN BOWMAN BARBRA FOX T STURGILL TOM TOLLIVER MARCIA VANOVER BILLIE KINCER OCCUPANT UNKNOWN CHARLES HOLBROOK GARY ROSE CARRIE WRIGHT JAMES HITCHCOCK OCCUPANT UNKNOWN JAMES HITCHCOCK KINGS CORNER LININGS RHINO GARY FLEMING GRUBBS CERAMIC GIFTS & FLORALS BUDDY GRUBB CHUCK GRUBBS JIMMY WRIGHT CASSIE WHITAKER BOB KNIGHT TOMMY ROSE JAMES STAMBAUGH ELMER BROWN ELMER BROWN KENNETH WEBB 4327237.27 Page: A2 Target Street - Cross Street HIGHWAY 119 N 9282 9404 9424 9499 9504 9598 9645 9700 9731 9773 9802 9868 9936 9941 9966 9978 9984 10006 10053 10318 10336 10600 Source Cole Information Services 2013 (Cont'd) OCCUPANT UNKNOWN PATRICIA BOLLING ROY BENTLEY OCCUPANT UNKNOWN RONNIE WRIGHT KIM PAGE WAYLON BODY SHOP LARRY ELKINS AMBER WYATT JOHN WHITAKER JAMIE ANDERSON JEFFS COLLISION CENTER INC REGINA SEXTON OCCUPANT UNKNOWN SILAS PARROTT BILL VANOVER SILAS PARROTT REBA DUNN ROBERT INGRAM ROGER COLLIER TIMOTHY RICHARDSON MARVIN BOGGS 4327237.27 Page: A3 Target Street - Cross Street HIGHWAY 119 N 3411 4686 6088 6242 6269 6594 6749 6825 6983 7112 7246 7247 7308 7318 7320 7360 7368 7376 7378 7398 7400 7541 7569 7641 7869 7876 7915 7937 7959 7979 7993 8005 8041 8043 8109 8137 8155 8257 8957 9404 9424 9485 9645 9731 9773 Source Cole Information Services 2008 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO GORDON WEBB ROLAND WHITE USED CARS MARK COOK RED ROOF BINGO NOLAN WHITE MARK WRIGHT DOUG HOLBROOK CHARLE ENGLE BILLY STAMPER BRUCE OUTLAW DEBBIE DAVIS SABRINA BARNETT ALISON BROWN HEATHER SEXTON RACHEL DYER TERESA BURKE JEFFREY RAEHAL GREGORY TRENT JEFF SEXTON TOM TOLLIVER PAUL VANOVER JEANNE CHANNELL LAUREL FORK INVESTMENTS INC WALTER KINCER CHARLES HOLBROOK JAMES BULLION RICHARD HITCHCOCK JAMES HITCHCOCK LININGS RHINO RHINO LININGS GARY FLEMING GRUBBS CERAMICS GIFTS & FLORALS BUDDY GRUBB CHUCK GRUBBS JIMMY WRIGHT JASON SMITH TOMMY ROSE JAMES STAMBAUGH ELMER BROWN EVA YOUNG BLANCHE WEBB P BOLLING ROY BENTLEY G & L CUSTOM EXHAUST GREGORY BENTLEY ROADTRIP MOTOR CO MCPEEK HEATING & COOLING & ELECTRI PEGGY CORNETT JOHN WHITAKER 4327237.27 Page: A4 Target Street - Cross Street HIGHWAY 119 N 9868 9936 9941 9978 9984 10318 10336 10600 Source Cole Information Services 2008 (Cont'd) JEFFS COLLISION CENTER LAWRENCE SEXTON GEORGE BEVINS BILL VANOVER SILAS PARROTT ROGER COLLIER CAN RICHARDSON MARVIN BOGGS 4327237.27 Page: A5 Target Street - Cross Street HIGHWAY 119 N 2587 4675 4686 6088 6625 6749 6785 6983 7112 7246 7360 7400 7541 7641 7689 7759 7869 7876 7937 7959 7979 8005 8041 8085 8137 8257 8957 9404 9424 9485 9598 9645 9700 9731 9812 9868 9941 9966 9978 10053 10311 10318 10336 Source Cole Information Services 2003 JOE HOLBROOK ARLIN SHEPHERD GORDON WEBB ROLAND WHITE USED CARS GLENDA RICHARDSON HARVEST HOUSE MARK WRIGHT WRIGHTS MARINE & RV INC DELORES ENGLE DONNIE FIELDS DANA OUTLAW ESTHER WRIGHT M ADAMS LAUREN CHANNELL CHARLES HOLBROOK BOBBY WARF FRANK MULLINS JAMES BULLION CARL HITCHCOCK PERFECT FIT TRUCK & CAR ACSRY GARY FLEMING GRUBBS CERAMICS GIFTS & FLRL CHUCK GRUBBS COUNTRY COTTAGE FURNITURE JIMMY WRIGHT TOMMY ROSE JAMES STAMBAUGH JAMES YOUNG HENRY WEBB P BOLLING ROY BENTLEY ROADTRIP AUTO SALES MARTIN PAGE MCPEEK HTNG & CLNG & ELCTRCL APRIL ANDERSON PEGGY SEXTON DOROTHY MILLER JEFFS BODY & CUSTOM SHOP INC JEFFS BODY SHOP GEORGE BEVINS DOROTHY DOTSON BILL VANOVER ROBERT INGRAM RAY STALLARD ROGER COLLIER CAN RICHARDSON 4327237.27 Page: A6 Target Street - Cross Street HIGHWAY 119 N 4150 4675 4686 6625 7876 7959 8005 8041 8257 8945 8957 9404 9485 9598 9941 9966 9978 10311 10336 Source Cole Information Services 1999 CHESTER ADAMS ARLIN SHEPHERD G WEBB GLENDA RICHARDSON RICHARDSON AL & GLENDA GIFTS AND DECORATING RICHARD HITCHCOCK GARY FLEMING CHUCK GRUBBS JIMMY WRIGHT DICKIE COOK GREG KELLY HENRY WEBB P BOLLING GREGORY BENTLEY MARTIN PAGE GEORGE BEVINS DOROTHY DOTSON BILL VANOVER RAY STALLARD CAN RICHARDSON 4327237.27 Page: A7 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA Appendix G: User Questionnaire October 2015 Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix H: Qualifications Federal Bureau of Prisons Payne Gap Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ERIKA FUERY ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST TEC INC. - MIDDLETOWN, CT EDUCATION 1995/B.A./Field Biology/Environmental Studies/University of Northern Colorado 2004/M.S./Environmental Science/University of New Haven CERTIFICATIONS Professional Certification in Geographical Information Systems, University of New Haven, 2001 OSHA HAZWOPER Certification Niton XRF Certification Trimble GPS Training ISO 14001:2004 E.M.S. Lead Auditor YEARS EXPERIENCE: 10 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Ms. Fuery is an Environmental Scientist who specializes in dredged material management, Phase I/Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, remedial investigations and documentation, and Geographical Information Systems analysis. She has conducted remedial investigations in Massachusetts, Delaware, Virginia and Connecticut and provided management alternatives analyses for contaminated material for projects in Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida, New York and Connecticut. She has worked closely with state and Federal agencies and has successfully assisted clients in making management decisions regarding contaminated materials by providing comprehensive cost analyses for available disposal methods that have been approved by the EPA. Ms. Fuery has contributed to numerous NEPA documents and has assisted in preparation of Federal and state environmental permit applications. Completed Detailed Phase I Environmental Site on Several Properties in the Northeast U.S.. The primary objective of the Phase I ESA is to render an opinion as to whether surficial or historical evidence indicates the presence of recognized environmental conditions which would result in a release of hazardous materials into the environment, as defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Practice E1527-00 for Phase I ESAs. The studies included; site reconnaissance; review of the property history; and, review of selected local, state and federal regulatory records. Completed Numerous Phase II Subsurface Investigations to Determine Absence or Presence of Contamination at Sites in Pennsylvania, Connecticut and Massachusetts. Phase II investigations involved the sampling of soil and groundwater in areas deemed likely to have been impacted by hazardous materials based on current and historical land use practices. The results of the Phase II investigations determined whether remediation was necessary at the sites. Contributed to Work Plan Development, Site Assessment, Long Term Monitoring and Remediation of a Contaminated Park in East Hartford, CT. The project was located in a municipal park near a residential neighborhood and a school. The site was formerly a gravel pit that was filled in 1960s and 1970s. As a result of the filling activities, elevated levels of regulated compounds were present in the soil and groundwater at several locations within the property boundaries. The remediation of the site included excavation and disposal of impacted soils, backfilling the excavations with clean material to render the site acceptable for residential activities, and long-term, quarterly groundwater monitoring in accordance with Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection requirements. Dredge Material Management and Environmental Assessment of Pier 3 Replacement, Naval Weapons Station Earle, Colts Neck, NJ - Team analyst, conducted a Dredged Material Disposal Alternatives Analysis as required under NEPA. The analysis involved detailed evaluations of disposal and dewatering options, locations and costs for several thousand cubic yards of contaminated dredged material as well as several thousand cubic yards of creosotetreated timber piles. Data provided in this analysis was also incorporated into the Environmental Assessment for this project. Development of Confined Aquatic Disposal Site and Environmental Assessment for Pier 6 Replacement, Naval Submarine Base, New London, CT - Team analyst, conducted a Dredged Material Disposal Alternatives Analysis as required under NEPA for several thousand cubic yards of contaminated sediment. The analysis involved detailed evaluations of treatment, disposal and dewatering options and well as a siting study and cost analysis. The analysis led to the conclusion that Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD) would provide the most cost-effective dredge material disposal option for the contaminated sediment. The successful CAD development was the first of this type of disposal method executed in the Thames River. Data provided in this analysis was also incorporated into the EA for this project. Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment for Maintenance Dredging of Naval Inactive Ship Reserve Basin Philadelphia, PA - Team Analyst, contributed to the development of a Feasibility Study and an EA for the proposed dredging, treatment, and disposal of approximately 300,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment from the NISMO Reserve Basin. Project challenges included heavy sediment contamination, presence of unexploded ordnance, and lack of available land area for dewatering and treatment of the contaminated sediments. Master Plan for Port of Vlora, Albania - Team Analyst, contributed to the development of a feasibility study for the development of an energy park in Vlora, Albania. The study analyzed the potential to develop a new, dedicated cargo port and adjacent energy park to the north of the city of Vlora. Project challenges included heavy mercury contamination at the proposed New Port site, lack of suitable waste stream controls, poorly maintained infrastructure, and a weak economy. Environmental Assessment for the Transfer of the Melville Marina Property at Naval Station Newport in Newport, RI – Team Analyst. Contributed to the development of an Environmental Assessment for the transfer of a former fueling depot property from the Navy to the state of Rhode Island. The waterfront property was identified as a historic district and had a long history of heavy industrial use. The site is being managed under the base IR program and remedial actions are currently ongoing at the site. Planning for Maintenance Dredging of Hague Basin at United States Merchant Marine Academy, Kings Point, NY - Team Analyst and Health and Safety Officer. Conducted a Dredged Material Disposal Alternatives Analysis as required under NEPA. The analysis involved detailed evaluations of disposal and dewatering options, locations and costs for several thousand cubic yards of contaminated dredged material. Participated in Sampling Plan development and results reporting and oversaw sampling activities to ensure compliance with the Sampling Plan and the Health and Safety Plan. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp Roxana, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared by: October 2015 United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street, NW Washington, DC 20534 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SUMMARY Cardno was retained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) at the 700-acre property, herein referred to as the subject property, located in eastern Letcher County, 7.5 miles west of Whitesburg, Kentucky (Figure 1 in Appendix A). The subject property, which is composed of multiple parcels under private ownership, is proposed for purchase by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to support development of a new federal correctional facility. This ESA meets or exceeds the requirements of the American Society for Materials and Testing (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process E 1527-13. This document follows the recommended structure for an ESA provided in ASTM E 1527-13. This report was prepared pursuant to an inquiry into the prior ownership and uses of the subject property, consistent with good commercial and customary practice. A REC is defined as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. A REC can include hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions and are defined as conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. No Phase I ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs to exist in connection with a property. This ESA has been prepared to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the existence of RECs in connection with the property, recognizing the limits of cost and time. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property with the exception of: • • • • The open drain at the large aboveground storage tank located to the north of the Meade compound The compressor station and surrounding soils and open containers of petroleum products The damaged plastic aboveground storage tank located approximately 1,000 feet east of the compressor station Two transformers located near the Meade compound Cardno recommends that a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment should be conducted before the Federal Bureau of Prisons begins the property acquisition process. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ i 1 2 3 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Detailed Scope of Services ........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Significant Assumptions ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Limitations and Exceptions........................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Special Terms and Conditions ...................................................................................................... 3 1.6 User Reliance ................................................................................................................................ 3 Site Description ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location and Legal Description .................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics ..................................................................................... 4 2.3 Current Use of the Property .......................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Description of Structures, Roads and other Improvements on the Site ........................................ 4 2.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties ........................................................................................... 5 2.6 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.6.1 Climate .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.6.2 Topography ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.6.3 Geology ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.6.4 Soils....................................................................................................................................... 6 2.6.5 Surface Water........................................................................................................................ 6 2.6.6 Groundwater ......................................................................................................................... 7 User Provided Information.................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ................................................................. 7 3.2 Specialized Knowledge ................................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ............................................................................ 7 3.4 Owner, Manager, Occupant Information ...................................................................................... 8 Records Review .................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Title Records ................................................................................................................................. 8 4.2 Standard Environmental Record Sources...................................................................................... 9 4.3 Additional Environmental Record Sources................................................................................. 11 4.3.1 Building Permit Records ..................................................................................................... 12 4.3.2 Tax Map .............................................................................................................................. 12 4.4 Historical Use Information of Subject Property and Adjoining Properties ................................ 12 i Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA 5 6 7 4.4.1 Historical Topographic Maps.............................................................................................. 12 4.4.2 Historical Aerial Photos ...................................................................................................... 12 4.4.3 Sanborn Maps ..................................................................................................................... 13 4.4.4 City Directories ................................................................................................................... 13 Site Reconnaissance ............................................................................................................................ 14 5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ....................................................................................... 14 5.2 General Site Setting .................................................................................................................... 15 5.3 Exterior and Interior Observations .............................................................................................. 15 Interviews ............................................................................................................................................ 17 6.1 Owners ........................................................................................................................................ 17 6.2 Officials....................................................................................................................................... 17 6.3 Lessees ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................... 18 7.1 8 9 10 October 2015 Findings....................................................................................................................................... 18 7.1.1 Red Steel Barrel .................................................................................................................. 18 7.1.2 Storage Tanks and Pipelines ............................................................................................... 18 7.1.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls .................................................................................................. 19 7.1.4 Solid Waste ......................................................................................................................... 19 7.2 Opinion and Recommendations .................................................................................................. 19 7.3 Data Gaps .................................................................................................................................... 19 7.4 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 19 7.5 Limiting Conditions/Deviations.................................................................................................. 20 Non-Scope Considerations.................................................................................................................. 20 8.1 Asbestos Containing Materials ................................................................................................... 20 8.2 Lead Based Paint......................................................................................................................... 20 8.3 Radon .......................................................................................................................................... 20 References ........................................................................................................................................... 21 Certification .................................................................................................................................... 22 ii Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Parcel Identification and Property Owners ..................................................................................... 4 Table 2. Deed History of Subject Property Parcels....................................................................................... 8 Table 3. Mining Permit Holders of Subject Property ................................................................................... 9 Table 4. Federal and Kentucky Records – EDR Report ASTM Standard Radius Search .......................... 11 Table 5. Historical Topographic Maps Reviewed....................................................................................... 12 Table 6. Historical Aerial Photos Reviewed ............................................................................................... 13 Table 7. City Directory Results................................................................................................................... 14 APPENDICES Appendix A Figures Appendix B Photographic Record Appendix C Radius Map Appendix D Topographic Map Appendix E Aerial Photographs Appendix F City Directories Appendix G User Questionnaire Appendix H Qualifications iii Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose Cardno was retained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) at a 700-acre property located in eastern Letcher County, 7.5 miles west of Whitesburg, Kentucky. The subject property is south of KY Route 588 and west of KY Route 160 (Figure 1 in Appendix A). Cardno conducted this ESA in accordance with the American Society for Materials and Testing International Designation: E1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM E1527-13). This standard defines good and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a parcel of real estate with respect to petroleum products and the range of contaminants regulated under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The ASTM standard is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the “innocent landowner” defense to CERCLA liability. However, it should be noted that the property subject to this ESA is composed of multiple, privately-owned parcels of land.. This document follows the recommended structure for an ESA provided in ASTM E 1527-13. The goal of this Phase I ESA is to identify RECs on the subject property. A REC is defined as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. A REC includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions, generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment, and generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Structures on the subject property were also assessed for the potential presence of suspect asbestos-containing material, lead-based paint, and radon although no samples were collected during the Phase I ESA. This Phase I ESA report documents the environmental conditions of the subject property as observed on July 20 and 21, 2015. The results of this assessment are limited to a visual site reconnaissance, a state and federal regulatory database review, and interviews with individuals familiar with the subject property. No samples were collected of any environmental media (soil, water, asbestos, etc.) during this study. Information pertaining to environmental issues was gathered through site observations, interviews, and available documentation, as appropriate. A series of photographs taken at the subject property is included in the Photographic Record (Appendix B). 1.2 Detailed Scope of Services This report was prepared in response to the request by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to conduct an ESA accordance with ASTM E1527-13. The scope of services for this ESA included the following: • • Phase I ESA in accordance with the standards of the ASTM as set forth in Practice E 1527-13. Title search or assessor records review back to the first developed use or to 1940, whichever is earlier. 1 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA • • • October 2015 Visual site inspection of the subject property and surrounding area to evaluate present conditions. Evaluation of the historical use of the subject property, by reviewing aerial photographs and historic topographic maps reasonably available from public sources and Sanborn maps. Review of records reasonably available from appropriate federal, state, and local regulatory agencies for documented soil and/or groundwater contamination investigations conducted at the subject property and vicinity, as defined in the ASTM standard. • Review of the compliance history of the subject property, and of any adjacent sites, as identified by the regulatory database review. • • • Interviews with individuals familiar with the subject property and surrounding areas. Review of the proposed site plan. Presentation of the aforementioned services in this report. 1.3 Significant Assumptions The research, site reconnaissance, and interviews conducted in support of this ESA are based upon assumptions intended to be referred to in resolving any ambiguity or exercising such discretion as is accorded the user or environmental professional in performing an ESA or in judging whether a user or environmental professional has conducted appropriate inquiry or has otherwise conducted an adequate ESA. These assumptions are as follows: • Records reviewed are assumed to be complete as provided by the source of the record (government agencies or commercial services) and current as of the date of review. Government information obtained from non-governmental agencies is considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the governmental agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public. • It is assumed that person(s) interviewed in connection with this ESA have answered all questions posed by the person(s) conducting the interview, in good faith, to the extent of their actual knowledge. • No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with a property. This ESA is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with a property, and within reasonable limits of time and cost. All appropriate inquiry does not mean an exhaustive assessment of a clean property. There is a point at which the cost of information obtained or the time required to gather it outweighs the usefulness of the information and, in fact, may be a material detriment to the orderly completion of transactions. • Not every property will warrant the same level of assessment. Consistent with good commercial or customary practice, the level of assessment was guided by the type of property subject to assessment, the expertise and risk tolerance of the user, and the information developed in the course of the inquiry. It is assumed that ESAs must be evaluated based on the reasonableness of judgments made at the time and under the circumstances in which they were made. Subsequent ESAs should not be considered valid standards to judge the appropriateness of any prior assessment based on hindsight, new information, use of developing technology or analytical techniques, or other factors. 2 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 1.4 Limitations and Exceptions In preparing this report, Cardno has relied on information derived from secondary sources, computer databases, and personal interviews. Except as detailed in the report, Cardno has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of the information derived from the secondary sources cited in the report. Cardno makes no claims, warranties, or guarantees as to the accuracy of the information contained within the studies, reports, and data reviews that Cardno did not complete for this assessment. Cardno therefore offers this report based on the assumption that such information is accurate and complete. The findings, observations, and conclusions set forth in this report are limited by the client (also referred to as “user”) and/or contract technical specifications and the methods employed in meeting these specifications. The services requested by the client have been performed in accordance with currently accepted industry standards for the conduct of ESAs. In order to perform a comprehensive environmental evaluation, subsurface investigation and testing would be required in order to definitively determine whether contamination has affected the subject property. This ESA is site-specific in that it relates to assessment of environmental conditions on a specific parcel of commercial real estate. Consequently, this practice does not address many additional issues raised in transactions such as purchases of business entities, or interests therein, or of their assets, that may well involve environmental liabilities pertaining to properties previously owned or operated or other off-site environmental liabilities. 1.5 Special Terms and Conditions No special terms and conditions associated with the preparation of this report were identified. 1.6 User Reliance This report was prepared solely for the use of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and is not intended for use by third parties. Unauthorized third parties shall indemnify and hold Cardno harmless against any liability for any loss arising out of, or related to, reliance by any third party on any work performed hereunder, or the contents of this report. 2 SITE DESCRIPTION The following text provides a legal description of the subject property, its location, and the general characteristics of the property and surrounding area. 2.1 Location and Legal Description The subject property consists of approximately 700 acres of land encompassing nine parcels with eight separate land owners identified by the Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN) listed in Table 1. The subject property is located in Roxana, Kentucky. The location and boundary of the subject property is illustrated in Figure 1 contained in Appendix A. 3 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Table 1. Parcel Identification and Property Owners APN Owner 044-00-00-049.00 Ira Frazier 044-00-00-073.00 Mitchum Whitaker 044-00-00-076.00 Richard Isom Trust III (2 parcels with same APN) 044-00-00-043.00 Lee Gentry Heirs 044-00-00-037.00 Sandra Creech 044-00-00-039.00 Carlos Isom 044-00-00-077.00 Randall Meade 044-80-00-003.00 Thomas Stahl 2.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics The subject property is located approximately 7.5 miles west of Whitesburg, Kentucky. It is south of KY Route 588 and west of KY Route 160. The area was previously surface mined; however, mining activities no longer occur at the subject property. Land use surrounding the subject property is also primarily forested, with small single-family residences in the area. There are also several state parks and nature preserves within the area. They include Bad Branch Falls State Nature Preserve, Kingdom Come State Park, and Pine Mountain Wildlife Management Area. There are no zoning ordinances or land use classifications identified for this area (DePriest 2013). 2.3 Current Use of the Property Land use associated with the subject property includes residential and undeveloped areas. The undeveloped areas are predominantly forested and are primarily used for recreational activities such as hiking, primitive camping, and hunting. Several tree stands were observed. There are also former surface mined areas and a small agricultural area. The subject property also provides a venue for family gatherings and celebrations. A model airplane strip is also located on the subject property, as is. 2.4 Description of Structures, Roads and other Improvements on the Site Bluegrass Ridge Road traverses the property and connects KY Route 160 and Big Branch-Tolson Creek Road/Southeast Road. Both KY Route 588 and KY Route 160 are Class “A” roadways that can accommodate trucks having a gross vehicle weight of up to 44,000 pounds (Kentucky Transportation Cabinet 2014). A network of unimproved roads provide access to the subject property and to 14 natural gas wells located throughout the subject property. A natural gas compressor station is located along the western portion of the property and a small crude oil well is located near the northern extent of the property. A model airplane landing strip and small pavilion are located near the center of the subject property. A small open shed structure is located to the north of the landing strip. The purpose of this structure is not known, but old windows and doors were observed inside. To the east of the open shed is the Meade family compound. The compound contains several structures including two small concession buildings that contained tables and chairs, a small house that was not accessible at the time of inspection, a large open pavilion with a food preparation area and bandstand, and 4 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 modern and primitive restroom buildings. The modern restroom building was also not accessible at the time of inspection. There is electricity in the compound and two transformers were observed on the property. 2.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties Areas to the north of the subject property are largely forested but also support residential and agricultural uses. To the east are residences, a small market, and a railroad. Portions of the railroad were observed to be unmaintained and it is assumed that the railroad is no longer in use. To the south there is some agricultural activity and isolated residences, however, the area is largely forest as are areas to the west. 2.6 Physical Setting The following sections describe the environmental setting of the subject property and include information on climate, topography, geology, soils, surface water, and groundwater. 2.6.1 Climate The subject property is located in the Eastern Kentucky Coal Field Region. This region experiences mild spring and autumn weather, but temperatures rise to 90 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) an average of 20 days per year (Arnold 2015). The Kentucky climate is characterized by warm summers, with average high temperatures in the mid-80s, and cool winters, with average low temperatures in the high-30s to mid-40s. Kentucky experiences average annual precipitation ranging from over 40 inches in far northern Kentucky to more than 50 inches in south-central Kentucky. Precipitation tends to be well distributed throughout the year, though the fall is typically a bit drier than other seasons. Weather producing extremes of precipitation can develop quickly or persist for extended periods. Flash floods, usually resulting from intense but short lived thunderstorms or from storms training over an area, occur throughout Kentucky, but are a particular concern in the rugged terrain of eastern Kentucky, which is characterized by steep slopes and narrow valleys. Drought occurs periodically in Kentucky. When it does, it is often accompanied by oppressive heat (Foster no date [n.d.]). 2.6.2 Topography The topography at the subject property has been significantly impacted by mountaintop removal coal mining that occurred. According to mining permits issued for the site, mining activity occurred in the late 1960s and continued in varying degrees of intensity until the early 1990s. A plateau resulting from mining has replaced a mountain ridge in the central portion of the subject property. This change has not been accounted for on United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps; however, the highest point and lowest points of the subject property remain unchanged. The highest elevation is located in the southeastern portion of the subject property at an elevation of approximately 1,850 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The lowest elevation on the subject property is approximately 1,035 feet AMSL, located in the northwestern portion, adjacent to the North Fork of the Kentucky River. 2.6.3 Geology Pennsylvanian age sedimentary sandstones, siltstones, and shales of the Breathitt Formation characterize the surface geology of the subject property. The major formations below the Breathitt Formation (in order of occurrence) are the Lee Formation, Pennington Formation, Newman Limestone, Grainger Formation, 5 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 and the Chattanooga Shale. The principal mineral resources in the vicinity of the subject property are bituminous coal (Breathitt Formation) and natural gas (Chattanooga Shale). The natural gas bearing strata is over 3,000 feet below the subject property (Letcher County Planning Commission n.d.). The Fire Clay coal seam (approximate elevation 1,460 feet) is the principal seam of economic significance in the vicinity of the subject property. Surface mining in this seam created the relatively flat topography on the subject property. The site is unusual for Letcher County because most mountaintop removal operations in the county are underlain by extensive underground mines (Letcher County Planning Commission n.d.). However, at the subject property, the Whitesburg Coal Zone (approximate elevation 1,300 feet) is too thin to be of economic importance. Further, the next significant coal seam down column, the Elkhorn No. 3 (approximate elevation 1,100 feet), is below drainage at the site. The relative thinness of the seam (6 inches to 4 feet thickness) and its location below drainage make coal resources within this seam costly to recover. The lack of existing deep mines in the Elkhorn No. 3 seam in the vicinity of the subject property suggests that this seam is currently uneconomical to mine (Letcher County Planning Commission n.d.). 2.6.4 Soils The three most common soils on the subject property are the Cloverlick-Kimper-Highsplint complex (3065 percent slopes), the Kaymine, Fairpoint and Fiveblock soils map unit (2-70 percent slopes), and the Shelocta-Highsplint (30-65 percent slopes). To a lesser degree the following soils underlie the subject property: Allegheny Loam (2-25 percent slopes), Dekalb-Gilpin-Rayne complex (25-65 percent slopes), Fiveblock and Kaymine soils (0-30 percent slopes), Gilpin-Shelocta complex (12-25 percent), Grigsby sandy loam (occasionally flooded), Grigsby-Urban land complex (0-6 percent slopes), Urban landUdorthents complex (0-15 percent slopes), and Urban land-Udorthents-Grigsby complex (0-6 percent slopes) (Natural Resources Conservation Service [NRCS] 2013). The subject property contains a small area of soils designated as farmland of statewide importance (NRCS 2013). The soil is Allegheny Loam and is located in the floodplain of the North Fork of the Kentucky River in the northernmost portion of the subject property. None of the soils associated with the subject property are listed as hydric by NRCS. 2.6.5 Surface Water The subject property is situated on top of a plateau, which is the result of mining a portion of the mountain. As a result of the mining, the hydrology of the subject property has been greatly disturbed. Approximately 3.1 acres (1.3 hectares) of wetlands have been delineated on the subject property. The majority of the wetlands are located within the east and west sides of the south-central portion of the subject property (TEC Inc., 2011; Cardno 2014). There are several small ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial unnamed streams identified and mapped on the subject property. Additionally, an open water wetland (pond) comprising approximately 0.41 acres (0.17 hectares) is located along its eastern boundary, north of Rise Branch. The subject property is not located in a 100-year floodplain (Environmental Data Resources [EDR] 2015a). 6 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 2.6.6 Groundwater There are no groundwater wells on the subject property, but there is a single domestic household well located north of the subject property at an elevation of 1,200 feet with a depth to water of 80 feet. Groundwater flow tends to follow the slope topography and is assumed to flow towards the north, east, and west of the subject property toward North Fork Kentucky River, Kings Creek, and Tolson Branch, respectively. Variations in groundwater conditions are expected based on location and elevation across the subject property, seasonal conditions, and weather patterns. The subject property is underlain by the Breathitt Group, which is comprised of the Pikeville Formation and the Hyden Formation, and the Four Corners Formation. The Breathitt Group yields more than 500 gallons per day in more than three-quarters of the wells drilled in valley bottoms, more than 500 gallons per day in about three-quarters of the wells on hillsides, and more than 100 gallons per day to nearly all wells on ridges within Letcher County (Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky 2015). There are no sole source aquifers underlying the subject property (United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] 2013). The quality of the groundwater in Letcher County ranges from moderately hard in most of the county to moderately soft south of Pine Mountain. Naturally occurring contaminants present in the groundwater consist of sulfate, salt (sodium chloride), iron, and manganese (Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky 2015). Groundwater sample data compiled by the Kentucky Division of Mine Permits indicate that groundwater pH is at or near neutral (i.e., 7) and ranges between 6.4 and 8 with sulfate concentrations ranging between 24 and 340 (no units given) (Kentucky Division of Mine Permits 2015). Sulfate does not have a health-based drinking water standard, however, the USEPA has established a nonenforceable secondary standard of 250 mg/L (parts per million). According to the Kentucky Division of Water, Groundwater Branch, Letcher County has areas of moderate and high sensitivity to groundwater pollution. The hydrogeologic sensitivity reflects the ease and speed with which a contaminant can move into and within a groundwater system. The hydrogeologic sensitivity of Letcher County has been assigned a value of three out of five, with five being the most susceptible to groundwater pollution and one being the least susceptible. The region is given a three due to the observation that subcutaneous drains and enlarged fractures influence groundwater recharge, fissure networks influence flow, and bidirectional dispersal patterns influence overall dispersion (Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection 1994). 3 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 3.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations No information on environmental liens or activity and use limitations were provided by the user. 3.2 Specialized Knowledge No specialized knowledge about the subject property was provided by the user. 3.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues No information on valuation reduction for environmental issues was provided by the user. 7 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 3.4 Owner, Manager, Occupant Information The subject property is currently comprised of nine separate parcels with eight property owners. Current property owners are listed in Table 1. 4 RECORDS REVIEW The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review records that will help identify RECs in connection with the property. Reasonably ascertainable information from standard environmental and historical record sources is reviewed for the subject and surrounding properties. The objective of consulting historical sources is to develop a history of the previous uses of the property and the surrounding area in order to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to RECs in connection with the property. Some standard historical sources may be excluded if the sources are not reasonably ascertainable, or if past experience indicates that the sources may not be sufficiently useful, accurate, or complete in terms of satisfying the objectives. 4.1 Title Records Title records for the subject property were reviewed at the Whitesburg Courthouse on Tuesday, July 21, 2015 and are summarized in Table 2. Title search or assessor records review back to the first developed use or to 1940, whichever is earlier. APN 044-00-00-049.00 044-00-00-073.00 044-00-00-076.00 044-00-00-043.00 044-00-00-043.00 Table 2. Deed History of Subject Property Parcels Owner Deed (Current owner shown in bold) Book/Page Ira Frazier 71/7 Ira and Rosa Hogg Q/164 Mitchum Whitaker 337/537 Jeff and Tommie Whitaker 336/578 Richard Isom Trust III 385/537 Edward Day 268/505 Mineral Development Corporation 116/568 Joseph Altemus No data Virginia Stamper 263/263 Birchil Stamper No data Gregory Fleenor and Jackie Todd Crabtree 268/514 Annabelle Ratliff 132/247 Duncan Hampton No data Lee Gentry Jr. 155/163 Kingdon and Rachel Frazier 87/266 Lee Gentry Jr. 357/238 Maurice and Caretta Brashears 222/226 Virginia Stamper 166/534 Kingdon Frazier 142/261 Nora and Hiram Frazier 87/266 8 Date Purchased March 26, 1926 1892 January 16, 1998 November 13, 1945 August 21, 2005 August 10, 1982 September 30, 1946 July 15, 1901 December 10, 1983 June 11, 1964 December 7, 1983 April 26, 1948 No Date October 17, 1958 February 25, 1935 November 30, 2001 October 8, 1976 June 11, 1964 April 16, 1953 February 25, 1935 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA APN 044-00-00-037.00 044-00-00-039.00 044-00-00-077.00 044-80-00-003.00 October 2015 Table 2. Deed History of Subject Property Parcels Owner Deed (Current owner shown in bold) Book/Page 264/449 Sandra Creech Irvin Ison, Rhoda Ison and Carlos Ison 102/261 George and Vina Caudill, Ollie Fields, 103/103 G.M. Fields Carlos Isom 264/454 Irving and Eva Isom 102/261 George and Vina Caudill and Ollie and 103/103 G.M. Fields Rondall and Sharon Meade 200/695 Nathan and Delcie Hall 193/287 Nora and Kingdon Frazier 87/266 Thomas Stahl 312/28 CMH Homes Incorporated 307/106 Doug Lee and Patty Sue Gentry 275/731 Andrew Jackson and Geneva Gentry 134/283 S.R. and Lula Gentry 95/153 Date Purchased October 14, 1982 November 21, 1941 June 10, 1939 October 14, 1982 November 21, 1941 June 10, 1939 June 6, 1973 June 18, 1971 February 25, 1935 October 25, 1993 November 14, 1992 August 5, 1985 November 26, 1949 September 10, 1938 A review of the Kentucky Coal Mine Map Viewer and Information System as well as the Kentucky Surface Mining Viewer provided information regarding mining permit holders for the subject property. Mining permit holders are summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Mining Permit Holders of Subject Property State File/ Permit Number Permittee Year 575876X KY Carolina Coal Company 1977 13652 Triple G and T Coal Company 1978 0670105 Richard Isom 1982 8674008 C and C Coal Company 1986 8675055 Highland Resources 1987 8675062 Big Oak Coal Company 1987 8670298 Meade and Shepherd Coal Company 1989 4.2 Standard Environmental Record Sources Documents reviewed for the preparation of this report included the search results of federal and Commonwealth of Kentucky environmental records databases, USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle historical topographic maps, historical aerial photographs, and Sanborn fire insurance maps. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) was contracted to prepare a GeoCheckTM Report to identify potential sources of contamination at the subject and adjacent properties (EDR 2015a). The GeoCheckTM Report was derived from the search of federal and Commonwealth of Kentucky environmental database records for the subject and adjacent properties. The report was prepared to meet, at a minimum, the 9 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 government records search requirements of ASTM E 1527-13. EDR also provided the USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle historical topographic maps, historical aerial photographs, and Sanborn maps. Table 4 lists the ASTM-required search databases, the distance searched per database, and the associated results. Due to the size of the parcel being investigated, minimum search distances were extended onequarter mile to ensure complete coverage for the multi-parcel subject property. Appendix C contains the GeoCheckTM Report, including the list of searched databases (ASTM-required as well as supplemental databases), database descriptions and results, dates when updates were made, specified search distances, and maps. Three of the numerous databases searched, the Kentucky State Hazardous Waste Sites (KY SHWS), Kentucky Underground Storage Tank (KY UST), and KY SPILLS databases, contained information relevant to the subject property. The KY SHWS database is Kentucky’s equivalent to federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLIS). These sites may or may not already be listed on the CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. One KY SHWS was reported to be located over 1 mile from the subject property. The Kentucky West Virginia Gas Pipeline (well line W-837) is located 1.215 miles north-northwest of the subject property. According to the report, this gas line has been closed and the site restored. Therefore, it would not have any impact on site conditions at the subject property. The KY UST database contains information regarding UST’s regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) that must be registered with the commonwealth. Two registered USTs were reported to occur within 0.125 mile of the subject property. The Lee Gentry property, located at Highway 588 West, approximately 0.014 mile north-northeast of the subject property, was reported to contain a 560-gallon diesel UST and a 1,000-gallon gasoline UST. The USTs were reportedly removed in March 1998. This property is located at a lower elevation than the subject property and consequently, would not have an impact on site conditions at the subject property. The John W. Ison Grocery, located at 14858 Highway 160, approximately 0.115 miles east of the subject property, was reported to contain one 1,000-gallon, one 2,000-gallon, and two 3,000-gallon gasoline USTs. The 1,000-gallon and 2,000-gallon USTs were reportedly removed in July 1994 and the 3,000-gallon USTs were reportedly removed in January 2014. This property is located at a lower elevation than the subject property and consequently, would not have an impact on site conditions at the subject property. The KY SPILLS database is a listing of spill and/or release related incidents. One spill was reported to have occurred within 0.25 mile of the subject property in 2004. According to the report, a coal company was oiling a haul road resulting in soil contamination on the site. The incident was reported as being in compliance. As a result, the spill would not have any impacts on the subject property that would constitute a REC. 10 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Table 4. Federal and Kentucky Records – EDR Report ASTM Standard Radius Search Database FEDERAL NPL Proposed NPL Delisted NPL NPL liens CERCLIS CERCLIS-NFRAP FEDERAL FACILITY CORRACTS RCRA-TSDF RCRA-LQG RCRA-SQG RCRA-CESQG ERNS KENTUCKY KY SHWS KY SWF/LF KY SB139 KY PSTEAF INDIAN LUST KY UST INDIAN UST FEMA UST KY ENG CONTROLS KY INST CONTROLS KY VCP INDIAN VCP KY BROWNFIELDS US BROWNFIELDS DEBRIS REGION 9 ODI KY HIST LF KY SWRCY INDIAN ODI US CDL KY CDL US HIST CDL HMIRS KY SPILLS Search Radius (miles) Number of Sites Identified 1.25 1.25 1.25 0.25 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.25 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.25 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Source: EDR 2015a. Note: See Appendix C for the complete report, including explanation and description of acronyms. 4.3 Additional Environmental Record Sources A list of the additional records sources reviewed/searched during the preparation of this Phase I ESA is provided in the EDR Radius Map report contained in Appendix C. Only one additional database, the 11 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Mines Master Index File (US MINES), contained information regarding the subject property. The US MINES database contains mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. According to the database, 20 mines are located on or within a half mile of the subject property. 4.3.1 Building Permit Records The complete collection of building permit data available to EDR was searched, and as of June 16, 2015, EDR did not have access to building permits for the municipality in which the subject property is located. 4.3.2 Tax Map EDR performed a search of available property tax maps for the subject property and identified was no tax map coverage for the area including the subject property. 4.4 Historical Use Information of Subject Property and Adjoining Properties 4.4.1 Historical Topographic Maps Historical USGS topographic maps are useful for identifying historical land uses in an area, including road networks, development, and agricultural uses and other land use designations. The results of the review of USGS data from historical topographic maps for the years available are presented in Table 5. Copies of the referenced maps are contained Appendix D. Table 5. Historical Topographic Maps Reviewed USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle Date Whitesburg 1915 Roxana 1954 1976 Details Observed On the 1915 topographic map, several residences can be seen on the subject property and are located adjacent to streams and surface waters. School No. 6 is located along the western boundary of the subject property. On the 1954 topographic map, several residences still appear along the streams and surface waters on and adjacent to the subject property. Several areas have been cleared of forest. School No. 6 has been renamed Tolson School and a cemetery is located at the northern end of the subject property. Route 160 has been improved and extended to the west of the subject property The 1976 topographic map looks similar to the 1954 topographic map. Source: EDR 2015b. 4.4.2 Historical Aerial Photos Photographs taken from an aerial platform with sufficient resolution to allow for the identification of development and activities occurring on the subject property and adjoining properties were obtained from EDR and reviewed. The results of the review of the historical aerial photographs for the years available are presented in Table 6. Copies of these aerial photographs are contained in Appendix E. 12 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Table 6. Historical Aerial Photos Reviewed Date 1952 1983 1988 1991 1995 2008 2010 2012 Details Observed In the 1952 aerial photograph, the northern portion of the subject property appears to support agricultural uses. Some mining activity and disturbed and cleared areas are visible in two areas in the center and southeast corner of the subject property. In the 1983 aerial photograph, a very large area of disturbance is visible near the center of the subject property. Several narrow and sinuous areas of disturbance are visible across the subject property and coincide with area topography. In the 1988 aerial photograph, the disturbed areas near the center and throughout the subject property have been greatly expanded. Large and sinuous swaths of disturbance are visible across the subject property and coincide with site topography. The 1991 aerial photograph is limited to the southeast portion of the subject property. A very large area of disturbance is visible in the photograph where entire slope sides appear to have been disturbed and artificially contoured. The center of the subject parcel is largely deforested in the 1995 aerial photograph, and a small pond and building are visible. Although this area is quite disturbed it appears to be revegetating as is the artificially contoured area in the southeast portion of the subject property. Several buildings are visible on the southeast portion of the subject property In the 2008 aerial photograph, the central area of the subject parcel is still deforested and disturbed and may support agricultural uses. Several unimproved roads radiate from this area and terminate in forested areas. The southeast corner of the subject property is becoming reforested and may also support agricultural uses. In the 2010 aerial photograph, the central area of the subject property appears to be used more heavily for agricultural purposes, as does the area the southeast. The unimproved roads noted in the 2008 aerial photo are still visible and there appears to be less vegetation around them. The remainder of the subject property appears to be more forested. The 2012 aerial photograph appears the same as the 2010 photograph. Source: EDR 2015c. 4.4.3 Sanborn Maps The complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection were searched by EDR with regard to the subject property, and no fire insurance maps covering the subject property were found (EDR 2015c). 4.4.4 City Directories A City Directory Report for the subject property was provided by EDR. City Directories are reviewed to evaluate the potential liability of the subject property resulting from past activities. The EDR City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5-year intervals. Cole Information Services Directories were searched for the years 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003, 2006, and 2013. The subject property and adjoining property addresses and property owners were not listed for any of the years searched. One church on Highway 160, Premium Baptist Mission, was listed in the 1995 city directory. Several properties were listed on Highway 160 for the years 1999, 2003, 2006, and 2013. The majority of the properties were residences; the non-residential properties are listed in Table 7. None of the properties listed in Table 7 are located upgradient or adjacent to the subject property. Therefore, they would have no impact on conditions of the subject property. A copy of the city directory search results is contained in Appendix F. 13 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA City Directory Year 1999 2003 2006 2013 October 2015 Table 7. City Directory Results Address Business/Use 12816 Highway 160 Meade and Shepherd Coal Company 10899 Highway 160 Pats Parts and Pawn Shop 8978 Highway 160 Kings Creek Senior Center 6828 Highway 160 R&R Automotive and Machine 4014 Highway 160 Premium Baptist Church 3752 Highway 160 US Post Office 12843 Highway 160 Country Style In 12816 Highway 160 Meade and Shepherd Coal Company 11010 Highway 160 Meade and Son Trucking Pats Pawn 8978 Highway 160 Kings Creek Senior Center 12816 Highway 160 Meade and Shepherd Coal Company 11010 Highway 160 Kings County Volunteer Fire Department 10941 Highway 160 Days Engine Service 8978 Highway 160 Kings Creek Senior Center 8562 Highway 160 LDTM Incorporated 12816 Highway 160 Meade and Shepherd Coal Company 12023 Highway 160 Kings Creek Community Church 11010 Highway 160 Pats Pawn 8978 Highway 160 Kings Creek Senior Center 8881 Highway 160 Roxana Specialized Haulers Incorporated 1 Highway 160 Enterprise Coal Company Source: EDR 2015d. 5 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The objective of the site reconnaissance is to obtain information indicating the likelihood of RECs in connection with the property that may not be obvious to the owner/occupants 5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions The Cardno staff visited the subject property on July 20 and 21, 2015 and conducted site reconnaissance to identify visible evidence of potential environmental contamination. Specifically, the ESA team looked for evidence of previous contamination such as: • • • • • • • stained surface soils or distressed vegetation disturbed surface soils or reclaimed areas discarded containers, residues, and pools of liquid electrical equipment such as transformers and capacitors aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), USTs, piping, sumps, or other types of impoundment structures abandoned structures and associated utilities drainage structures and direction of stormwater runoff on the subject parcels and adjacent areas. The survey involved visually inspecting the subject property and the adjoining properties to the extent that these properties were readily accessible during the time of the visual inspection. Cardno staff 14 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 members inspected the subject property and conducted interviews with persons who were knowledgeable about the historical and current use of the subject property. A complete set of photographs from this inspection is provided in Appendix B and interview forms are provided in Appendix G. 5.2 General Site Setting The subject property site is located in a mountainous area of eastern Kentucky and was historically subject to mountain top mining activity that has resulted in a large, relatively flat area near the center of the subject property. The subject property is primarily forested, with small single-family residences in the area. There are also several state parks and nature preserves within the area as well as active coal mines. 5.3 Exterior and Interior Observations The subject property currently supports several uses including natural gas and oil extraction, remote control model aircraft launches, and recreational uses such as concerts and hunting. Several structures are located near the center of the subject property. A small pavilion is located near a small paved area used by the Mountain Flyers for launching remote controlled model aircraft. A small fire extinguisher was observed on a table under the pavilion. An empty 50-gallon drum and a second drum that was used as a trash receptacle were observed outside of the pavilion. The receptacle was equipped with a bear deterring lid. An old charcoal grill and a plastic container filled with sand and gravel was also observed near the pavilion. To the north of the pavilion is an open wooden structure. The purpose of the structure was undetermined but it may have served as a concession booth or judges booth for the remote control airstrip. Inside, old windows, a door and a metal bed frame were observed. Household trash and debris was also observed in the structure. To the east of the open structure is the Meade family compound. This fenced in area contained several structures and is used to host family reunions, concerts, and other social events. Farm equipment was also stored within the compound. The farm equipment appeared to be in working condition and was not observed to be leaking oil or grease. In the northwest corner of the compound, three wooden buildings were observed. Two appeared to be for concessions and one appeared to be a small residence or office. The concession buildings contained folding tables and chairs and other debris. The interiors were not painted. These buildings did not have electricity, running water, or heat. Bird nests were observed in the roof rafters. A 50-gallon drum containing household trash was observed outside the northernmost concession building. To the north of the concession buildings is the residential/office building. There was no access to the interior of the building. The wooden building was equipped with a rain barrel, and electrical lines to the building were observed. A metal pipe was also observed outside of the building. This pipe did not appear to be a fill or vent pipe or associated with a UST. Outside of this building a large, red, steel barrel with a hand pump was observed. The barrel contained liquid with a strong petroleum odor. There were no signs of leaks or spills on or around the barrel. As such, the barrel is considered to be an Environmental Concern. In the center of the compound a large fire pit was observed. The fire pit contained household trash. Along the eastern portion of the compound is a large wooden pavilion and band stand. A flatbed truck and a tractor were observed under the pavilion as well as an assortment of refrigerated cases, coolers, and 15 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 food preparation equipment. All cases and coolers were empty at the time of the site inspection. Several picnic tables, plastic chairs, and wooden benches were also observed under the pavilion. Near and under the bandstand area, children’s toys, aluminum gutters, and building debris was observed. At the southwest corner of the building two restroom facilities were observed. The eastern facility was of modern cinderblock construction and was divided into men’s and women’s facilities. Vent piping was observed in the rear of the facility. There was no access to the interior of the building. The second restroom facility was a wooden structure with primitive pit facilities. The building was divided into men’s and women’s facilities and contained two pits per side. The facilities appeared to be in disuse and were in disrepair. Two transformers were observed near the Meade family compound. One appeared to be newer and the second appeared to be much older and was heavily rusted. Placards were visible on the older transformer but only the number 25 was visible. This transformer did not appear to be in service. Until proven otherwise, these transformers are assumed to contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and are considered RECs. To the north of the Meade compound, remnants of a manufactured home were observed. All that appeared to remain of the structure were flooring support beans and skirting. Ductwork and insulation could also be observed. To the north of the Meade compound a gravel road extends northward to an oil pumping station and storage tank and a natural gas pipeline relay station. The oil pump was recently installed and was not observed during previous field surveys conducted on the subject property. No oil or staining was observed around the pumps or storage tank. The storage tank was contained within an earthen berm and was placarded as containing petroleum crude oil. No liner was observed beneath the tank. Drain piping for the berm was observed to be uncapped and likely due to the heavy rains that had moved through the area in the previous weeks. Because the drains were not capped and present a material threat of release, the oil storage tank is considered to be a REC. A natural gas compressor station was observed to the west of the Meade compound. The station is situated on a concrete slab with a shallow trough around the perimeter for spill containment. Two large steel fuel ASTs power the station. One is elevated and the second, larger tank is on a gravel surface and has no secondary containment. No spills or stains were observed around these tanks. Several fuel storage tanks were observed in association with the compressor station. A large spill was observed beneath a large valve and absorbent pads had been placed on the ground to absorb the oil; however, oil globules were observed in puddles near the valve. Several oil-stained areas were also observed around the compressor station, particularly in areas where piping was observed. On the north side of the compressor was an open topped, 50-gallon, plastic barrel and an open-topped 5-gallon bucket that contained liquid with strong petroleum odors. Because the barrel and bucket had no lids or were not placed within any spill containment, they present a material threat of release. The spill, stains, and open containers are considered to be RECs. A large container of antifreeze was also observed near the compressor. No leaks or stains were observed in association with this container. Approximately 50 yards south of the compressor station is a large steel oil tank. A small (i.e., quarter sized) dark stain was observed beneath a valve at the bottom of the tank. The storage tank was contained within an earthen berm. No liner was observed beneath the tank. Due to the relatively small size of the stain the release is considered to be a de minimis condition. 16 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Approximately 1,000 feet east of the compressor station, a large plastic oil storage tank was observed. The tank cap had been removed and the top had caved in allowing the contents to spill out. Dark stains, assumed to be from petroleum, were observed on and around the tank. The tank, which was observed to be contained within a lined berm, is considered a REC. Several natural gas collection and relay systems were observed across the site, but no staining or other environmental concerns were observed to be associated with them. At the southeast portion of the site, access roads appeared to have been recently installed. Since this area has already been mined, it is assumed that the roads are for logging purposes. It also appeared that some oil and gas equipment had been removed from the area. Debris such as steel cable was observed but no staining or other concerns were observed. 6 INTERVIEWS The objective of the owner/occupant interviews is to obtain information indicating the likelihood of RECs in connection with the property. In the case of abandoned properties, where there is evidence of potential unauthorized uses of the abandoned property or evidence of uncontrolled access to the abandoned property, interviews with one or more owners or occupants of neighboring or nearby properties are conducted. 6.1 Owners Cardno interviewed Mr. Rondall Meade on July 21, 2015 with regard to the condition of the subject property. Mr. Meade is a current landowner of a large area of the subject property and worked there when it was being actively mined. For the purpose of this Phase I ESA he is considered to be the major occupant of the subject property. Mr. Meade had no knowledge of any land use restrictions, liens, chemical usage, or historic disposal activities on the subject property. All coal excavations were backfilled with overburden and all machinery used for mining was removed from the subject property. Mr. Meade had no knowledge of any material, other than soils and rock, being buried on the subject property and no remediation activities have occurred on the subject property. 6.2 Officials Cardno interviewed Mr. Elwood Cornett, Chairman of the Letcher County Planning Commission, on September 3, 2015 regarding the subject property. According to Mr. Cornett, the property was subject to surface mining activity for the removal of coal ore. No processing of coal was conducted on the subject property. Coal ore was removed from the subject property and trucked elsewhere for processing. Mr. Cornett had no knowledge of any liens or use limitations associated with the site or of any hazardous materials being present, historically or currently, on the subject property. 6.3 Lessees Cardno staff interviewed Mr. Clyde Roger Tyree, a director of the former Triple G and T Coal Company, on September 25, 2015 regarding the subject property. According to Mr. Tyree, the property was subject to surface mining activity for the removal of coal ore in the late 1970s and early 1980s. No processing of coal was conducted on the subject property. Coal ore was removed from the subject property and trucked elsewhere for processing. Fuel for the mining equipment was stored on-site in trailers and moved to wherever it was needed during mining operations. There was no designated storage area for petroleum, 17 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 oils, and lubricants. No wastes were disposed of or buried on the property and all machinery was removed when mining activity was completed. Prior to the 1970s–1980s mining operations, the area was mined by the Boone Fork Coal Company in the 1960s. Attempts were made to contact personnel associated with this mining company and were unsuccessful. 7 EVALUATION 7.1 Findings The results of the visual site inspection, record search, and interviews pertaining to the subject property are discussed below. These findings reflect conditions identified at the subject property or considered to have the potential to affect the subject property and include, but are not limited to, RECs, Controlled RECs, Historical RECs, and de minimis conditions as defined in ASTM E1527-13. 7.1.1 Red Steel Barrel The large, red, steel barrel with a hand pump that was observed in the Meade family compound is determined to be an environmental concern. The barrel contained liquid with a strong petroleum odor; however, no evidence of leaks or spills was observed on or around the barrel. The contents of the barrel should be characterized, removed, and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. 7.1.2 Storage Tanks and Pipelines Several large ASTs are located on the subject property. The storage tank to the north of the Meade compound is considered to be a REC due to the fact that the open drainage valve presents a material threat of release. The tank is associated with an active oil extraction operation and therefore must be assumed to contain petroleum crude oil, as placarded. The fact that bermed area is unlined is an environmental concern. Although no leaks or stains were observed at the oil pump near this AST, it is considered to be an environmental concern as it is a potential source of petroleum contamination. A natural gas compressor station observed to the west of the Meade compound has experienced a release, and cleanup methods to address the leak were observed to be insufficient. The compressor station and surrounding soils are considered to be a REC. Although no leaks or stains were observed around the larger steel fuel AST that powers the compressor station, it is considered be an environmental concern due to its lack of secondary containment and direct placement on the ground. The open topped, 50-gallon, plastic barrel and a 5-gallon bucket observed on the north side of the compressor present a material threat of release of petroleum products and are considered to be RECs. A small stained area was observed beneath a valve at the large steel oil tank located approximately 50 yards south of the compressor station. It is unlikely that this small release would prompt regulatory action and, therefore, it is considered to be a de minimis condition. However, the storage tank was contained within an earthen berm and no liner was observed beneath the tank. Therefore, the site, as a whole, presents an environmental concern. 18 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 The large plastic oil storage tank observed approximately 1,000 feet east of the compressor station is damaged and has released a portion of its contents. This AST is within a lined and bermed area; however, the condition of the liner is not known. This site is considered to be a REC. 7.1.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls The two transformers observed near the Meade family compound could not be discounted as containing PCBs. As such, these transformers are assumed to contain PCBs and are considered RECs. 7.1.4 Solid Waste Several small receptacles containing solid waste and a fire pit where solid waste appears to be burned were observed on the property. These are considered to be environmental concerns. 7.2 Opinion and Recommendations Based on information collected during the preparation of this report, a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is recommended to confirm the absence/presence of hazardous materials or petroleum products at the compressor station and at the leaking AST observed to the east of the compressor station. The two transformers located on the property should also be investigated for PCBs. At a minimum, the following recommendations are made: • • • • A surficial soil sample should be collected from the open drain at the large AST located to the north of the Meade compound to ensure no petroleum has escaped from the bermed area Several surficial and subsurface soil samples should be collected in areas around the compressor station and open containers of petroleum products to determine the depth and extent of petroleum contamination. If groundwater is encountered, groundwater grab samples are recommended. Several surficial and subsurface soil samples should be collected in areas around the damaged plastic AST located approximately 1,000 feet east of the compressor station. Prior to sampling, the area should be assessed to determine the presence and effectiveness of any liners inside the bermed area. If groundwater is encountered, groundwater grab samples are recommended. If accessible, a soil sample should be collected near the base of the two pole-mounted transformers located near the Meade compound. If the area cannot be accessed safely, local utility providers should be contacted to determine the age and contents of the transformers. 7.3 Data Gaps Two buildings within the Meade family compound were not accessible at the time of inspection. Because the contents of the two buildings could not be ascertained they are considered to be data gaps. 7.4 Conclusions Cardno has performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527 of the subject property located in Roxana, Kentucky. Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 8.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property except for the following: • • The open drain at the large AST located to the north of the Meade compound The compressor station and surrounding soils and open containers of petroleum products 19 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA • • October 2015 The damaged plastic AST located approximately 1,000 feet east of the compressor station Two transformers located near the Meade compound 7.5 Limiting Conditions/Deviations No substantial deviations from ASTM Practice E 1527-00 were involved with the preparation of this report. The subject property was characterized by steep slopes and thick undergrowth that limited access to many areas. All reasonable attempts were made to inspect the subject property to the fullest extent. 8 NON-SCOPE CONSIDERATIONS 8.1 Asbestos Containing Materials No sampling for asbestos was conducted as part of this Phase I ESA. Based on review of historic aerial photographs, the structures observed on the subject property appear to have been constructed in the early 1980s and therefore are not likely to contain asbestos. It is unknown when the manufactured home, whose remnants were observed on the subject property, was manufactured. Therefore, this structure may contain asbestos. 8.2 Lead Based Paint No sampling for lead based paint was conducted as part of this Phase I ESA. Based on review of historic aerial photographs, the structures observed on the subject property appear to have been constructed in the early 1980s and therefore are not likely to contain lead based paint. However, painted items of undetermined age were observed inside of the structure located to the north of the Mountain Flyers pavilion and may contain lead based paint. 8.3 Radon Radon is a naturally occurring, colorless, odorless, radioactive gas produced by the decay of uranium in rock and soil. Radon is a known carcinogen, responsible for increasing the risk of lung cancer when inhaled. Electrically charged radon atoms can attach to indoor air dust particles. Subsequently these dust particles may be inhaled and adhere to the lining of the lungs. The deposited atoms decay by emitting radiation that has the potential to cause cellular damage. Typically outside air contains very low levels of radon (USEPA 2015), but tends to accumulate in enclosed indoor spaces. When present, radon gas would typically concentrate in relatively airtight buildings with little outside air exchange. The USEPA classifies Letcher County as having a moderate potential for radon intrusion (Zone 2). Zone 2 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level between 2 and 4 picocuries per liter (pCi/L). The USEPA action level for radon is 4 pCi/L. 20 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 9 REFERENCES Arnold, Elizabeth. 2015. Climate in the Regions of Kentucky. USA Today. http://traveltips.usatoday.com/climate-regions-kentucky-104975.html DePriest, Joe. 2013. Economic Development Director, Letcher County. Personal Communication. Environmental Data Resources (EDR). 2015a. The EDR Radius Map™ Report With Geocheck. June 16, 2015. . 2015b. EDR Historical Topographic Map Report. June 16, 2015. . 2015c. EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package. June 16, 2015. . 2015d. EDR City Directory Image Report. June 16, 2015. Foster, Stuart. No date. Highlighting Kentucky’s Climate: What You Expect Isn’t Always What You Get. Kentucky’s Climate, Tho Cocorah’s “State Climates” Series. Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection (KDEP). 1994. Division of Water: Groundwater Branch. Groundwater Sensitivity Regions of Kentucky. http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsweb/download/wrs/sensitivity.pdf. Kentucky Division of Mine Permits. 2015. Kentucky Water Sample Data Viewer. http://gis.gapsky.org/watersample/. Accessed October 8, 2015. Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky. 2015. Kentucky Geologic Map Information Service. http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsmap/kgsgeoserver/viewer.asp. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC). 2014. Functional Classification. Available on-line at: http://transportation.ky.gov/Planning/Pages/Functional-Classification.aspx. Letcher County Planning Commission. No date. Preliminary Engineering Report. Development Sites Volume I. Roxana Prison Site. Prepared by Summit Engineering. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2013. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2015. http://www.epa.gov/radon/. USEPA. 2013. Region 4: Ground Water Protection, Sole Source Aquifers in the Southeast http://www.epa.gov/region4/water/groundwater/r4ssa.html. 21 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 10 CERTIFICATION I declare, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess the property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. October 8, 2015 Erika A. Fuery Date Environmental Scientist Cardno 22 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix A: Figures Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK V U 588 K E N T U C K Y _ ^ Letcher County V U 160 Legend Subject Property Boundary Road Classification Local Road Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Figure 1. Subject Property Location Map 0 0.25 0.5 Miles ± Photo 25 Photo 26 Photo 15 Photo 27 Photos 10 and 11 Photo 7 Photos 31 through 36 Photo 14 Photo 9 Photos 12 and 13 Photo 16 Photo 8 Photos 3 and 4 Photos 37 and 38 Photos 5 and 6 Photo 39 Photo 23 Photo 42 Photo 2 Photo 17 Photos 18 through 20 Photo 24 Photos 21 and 22 Photo 1 Legend Figure 2 Photo Location Map (1 of 3) Photo Location Subject Property Boundary 0 125 250 Feet ± Photo 40 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Photos 29 and 30 Photo 28 Legend Figure 3 Photo Location Map (2 of 3) Photo Location Subject Property Boundary 0 125 250 Feet ± Photo 25 Photo 26 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Photo 2 Photo 1 Photo 40 Photos 43 through 45 Legend Photo 46 Figure 4 Photo Location Map (3 of 3) Photo Location Subject Property Boundary 0 125 250 ± 500 Feet Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA Appendix B: Photographic Record October 2015 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 1 Description: Fire extinguisher beneath Mountain Flyers pavilion Photo Number: 2 Description: Mountain Flyers pavilion and trash receptacles. Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 3 Description: Unknown structure north of Mountain Flyers pavilion Photo Number: 4 Description: Debris inside unknown structure Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 5 Description: Northern portion of Meade Family compound (looking northeast) Photo Number: 6 Description: Southern portion of Meade Family compound (looking northeast) Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 7 Description: Farm equipment inside Meade family compound Photo Number: 8 Description: farm equipment inside Meade family compound. Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 9 Description: Two concession style buildings in Meade family compound Photo Number: 10 Description: Tables being stored inside concession building Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 11 Description: Chairs stored inside concession building Photo Number: 12 Description: Chairs and debris stored inside concession building Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 13 Description: Interior of concession building. Photo Number: 14 Description: Residence/office building in Meade family compound Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 15 Description: Steel barrel with oily liquid outside of residential/office structure in Meade family compound Photo Number: 16 Description: Household trash inside fire pit in Meade family compound Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 17 Description: Flatbed truck in pavilion in Meade family compound Photo Number: 18 Description: Food preparation and storage equipment in pavilion in Meade family compound Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 19 Description: Food preparation and storage equipment in pavilion in Meade family compound with tractor in background Photo Number: 20 Description: Food preparation and storage equipment in pavilion in Meade family compound Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 21 Description: Exterior of modern restroom facility Photo Number: 22 Description: Vent piping behind modern restroom facility. Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 23 Description: Interior of primitive restroom facility Photo Number: 24 Description: Debris beneath pavilion bandstand Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 25 Description: Remnants of manufactured home north of Meade family compound Photo Number: 26 Description: Old, inactive transformer north of Meade family campground. Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 27 Description: Newer, active transformer north of Meade family compound Photo Number: 28 Description: Oil well pump and storage tank near northern extent of subject property Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 29 Description: Unlined berm area around storage tank Photo Number: 30 Description: Uncapped drain pipe Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 31 Description: Compressor station looking northwest Photo Number: 32 Description: Compressor station fuel tank with no secondary containment Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 33 Description: Release and ineffective spill controls at compressor station Photo Number: 34 Description: Free product in puddle at compressor station Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 35 Description: Open containers of oily liquid at compressor station Photo Number: 36 Description: Stained soil around compressor station Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 37 Description: Storage tank in unlined berm area southeast of compressor station Photo Number: 38 Description: Small leak from storage tank valve Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 39 Description: Damaged and open AST and stained soil approximately 1,000 feet east of compressor station. This AST is within an earthen berm that appeared to be lined. Photo Number: 40 Description: Western view from center of subject property Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 41 Description: Western view from northern extent of subject property Photo Number: 42 Description: Eastern view from just south of the Meade family compound Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 43 Description: Southern view from center of subject property Photo Number: 44 Description: Eastern view from center of subject property Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Photographic Record Client: Federal Bureau of Prisons Job Number: 004253 Photo Number: 45 Description: Northern view from center of subject property Photo Number: 46 Description: Debris at southeast extent of property Location: Roxana, KY Date: July 2015 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix C: Radius Map Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Roxana 8218 Kentucky 160 Hallie, KY 41821 Inquiry Number: 4327237.2s June 16, 2015 The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck® 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com FORM-LBB-DXG TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 7 Orphan Summary 44 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-12 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-14 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC4327237.2s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 8218 KENTUCKY 160 HALLIE, KY 41821 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 37.1060000 - 37˚ 6’ 21.60’’ 82.9544000 - 82˚ 57’ 15.84’’ Zone 17 326333.4 4108215.2 1357 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: Most Recent Revision: 37082-A8 ROXANA, KY 1976 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT Portions of Photo from: Source: 20120629, 20120706 USDA TC4327237.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 8218 KENTUCKY 160 HALLIE, KY 41821 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS RELATIVE ELEVATION DIST (ft. & mi.) DIRECTION A1 BIG OAK COAL COMPANY US MINES Higher 1 ft. A2 MARIE ENTERPRISES IN US MINES Higher 1 ft. 3 LANCE COAL CORP US MINES Higher 1 ft. 4 MEADE & SHEPHERD COA US MINES Higher 1 ft. B5 LEE GENTRY PROPERTY HWY 588 W UST Lower 76, 0.014, NNE B6 ROXANNE BP US HWY 160 S SB193 Lower 202, 0.038, NE C7 BLACKEY ELKHORN COAL US MINES Lower 393, 0.074, SSW C8 C & O COAL COMPANY I US MINES Lower 419, 0.079, SSW 9 JOHN W ISON GROCERY 14858 HWY 160 UST Lower 608, 0.115, East D10 FLEENOR INC MILL BRANCH W/KY RT NPDES Lower 628, 0.119, NNW D11 FLEENOR INC US MINES Lower 628, 0.119, NNW D12 MILL BRANCH PROCESSI US MINES Lower 628, 0.119, NNW D13 W & F CONTRACT AUGER US MINES Lower 628, 0.119, NNW SPILLS Lower 850, 0.161, WSW 14 E15 ASHER’S QUALITY COAL US MINES Lower 1501, 0.284, SSW E16 ASHER’S QUALITY COAL US MINES Lower 1501, 0.284, SSW 17 SOUTH EAST COAL SALE US MINES Lower 1553, 0.294, East 18 WHITESBURG COAL INC US MINES Lower 1586, 0.300, ENE 19 MEADE & SHEPHERD COA US MINES Higher 1987, 0.376, SW 20 BUBS CONTRACTING INC US MINES Higher 2075, 0.393, North 21 COAL MOLE INC US MINES Higher 2171, 0.411, South 22 CLARK MINING, INC. US MINES Higher 2318, 0.439, North F23 WHITESBURG COAL INC US MINES Higher 2532, 0.480, ENE F24 LAKE COAL COMPANY IN US MINES Higher 2533, 0.480, ENE 25 K C COAL COMPANY INC US MINES Higher 2630, 0.498, SW 26 KENTUCKY WEST VIRGIN SHWS Lower 6415, 1.215, NNW NONE 4327237.2s Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL Proposed NPL NPL LIENS National Priority List Proposed National Priority List Sites Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS FEDERAL FACILITY Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA-SQG RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS US INST CONTROL Engineering Controls Sites List Sites with Institutional Controls TC4327237.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Facilities List State and tribal leaking storage tank lists PSTEAF INDIAN LUST Facility Ranking List Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists INDIAN UST FEMA UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS INST CONTROL Engineering Controls Site Listing State Superfund Database State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Kentucky Brownfield Inventory ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI DEBRIS REGION 9 HIST LF SWRCY INDIAN ODI Open Dump Inventory Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations Historical Landfills Recycling Facilities Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL CDL US HIST CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Clandestine Drub Lab Location Listing National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information TC4327237.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR DOT OPS DOD FUDS CONSENT ROD UMTRA TRIS TSCA FTTS HIST FTTS SSTS ICIS PADS MLTS RADINFO FINDS RAATS RMP UIC DRYCLEANERS AIRS LEAD INDIAN RESERV SCRD DRYCLEANERS Financial Assurance COAL ASH LEAD SMELTERS US AIRS EPA WATCH LIST US FIN ASSUR COAL ASH EPA PCB TRANSFORMER COAL ASH DOE 2020 COR ACTION PRP RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Incident and Accident Data Department of Defense Sites Formerly Used Defense Sites Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Records Of Decision Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Substances Control Act FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Section 7 Tracking Systems Integrated Compliance Information System PCB Activity Database System Material Licensing Tracking System Radiation Information Database Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Risk Management Plans UIC Information Drycleaner Listing Permitted Airs Facility Listing Environmental Lead Program Report Tracking Database Indian Reservations State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Financial Assurance Information Listing Coal Ash Disposal Sites Lead Smelter Sites Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem EPA WATCH LIST Financial Assurance Information Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB Transformer Registration Database Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data 2020 Corrective Action Program List Potentially Responsible Parties EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR US Hist Auto Stat EDR US Hist Cleaners EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List TC4327237.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Environmental Protection’s Uncontrolled Site Branch List. A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/25/2015 has revealed that there is 1 SHWS site within approximately 1.25 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation ____________________ KENTUCKY WEST VIRGIN Facility Status: Closed Facility Id: 1242 Address ________ NONE Direction / Distance ___________________ Map _____ID Page _____ NNW 1 - 2 (1.215 mi.) 26 43 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists SB193: The inventory indicates facilities that have performed permanent closure activities at a regulated underground storage tank facility and have known soil and/or groundwater contamination. A review of the SB193 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/05/2006 has revealed that there is 1 SB193 site within approximately 0.75 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation ____________________ ROXANNE BP Facility Id: 6892067 Address ________ US HWY 160 S Direction / Distance ___________________ Map _____ID Page _____ NE 0 - 1/8 (0.038 mi.) B6 9 TC4327237.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Department of Environmental Protection’s Owner/Facility Report of All Tanks Regardless of Status list. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/04/2015 has revealed that there are 2 UST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation ____________________ Address ________ Direction / Distance ___________________ Map _____ID Page _____ LEE GENTRY PROPERTY Closed In Place Date: 03/19/1997 Tank Status: TRM Facility Id: 59894 HWY 588 W NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.014 mi.) B5 8 JOHN W ISON GROCERY Tank Status: TRM Facility Id: 59891 14858 HWY 160 E 0 - 1/8 (0.115 mi.) 9 10 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Records of Emergency Release Reports SPILLS: A listing of spill and/or release related incidents. A review of the SPILLS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/05/2015 has revealed that there is 1 SPILLS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation ____________________ Address ________ Not reported Facility Status: Env. Closed Inc ID: 184378 Direction / Distance ___________________ Map _____ID WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.) 14 Page _____ 24 Other Ascertainable Records US MINES: Mines Master Index File. The source of this database is the Dept. of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration. A review of the US MINES list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/30/2014 has revealed that there are 20 US MINES sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ BIG OAK COAL COMPANY MARIE ENTERPRISES IN LANCE COAL CORP MEADE & SHEPHERD COA MEADE & SHEPHERD COA BUBS CONTRACTING INC COAL MOLE INC CLARK MINING, INC. Address ________ Direction / Distance ___________________ Map _____ID Page _____ 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.376 mi.) N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.393 mi.) S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.411 mi.) N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.439 mi.) A1 A2 3 4 19 20 21 22 7 7 7 8 34 34 35 35 TC4327237.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ Address ________ WHITESBURG COAL INC LAKE COAL COMPANY IN K C COAL COMPANY INC Lower Elevation ____________________ Address ________ BLACKEY ELKHORN COAL C & O COAL COMPANY I FLEENOR INC MILL BRANCH PROCESSI W & F CONTRACT AUGER ASHER’S QUALITY COAL ASHER’S QUALITY COAL SOUTH EAST COAL SALE WHITESBURG COAL INC Direction / Distance ___________________ Map ID _____ Page _____ ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.480 mi.) ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.480 mi.) SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.498 mi.) F23 F24 25 42 42 42 Direction / Distance ___________________ Map ID _____ Page _____ SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.074 mi.) SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.079 mi.) NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.119 mi.) NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.119 mi.) NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.119 mi.) SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.284 mi.) SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.284 mi.) E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.294 mi.) ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.) C7 C8 D11 D12 D13 E15 E16 17 18 10 10 14 20 21 24 30 33 34 NPDES: A listing of permitted wastewater facilities. A review of the NPDES list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/03/2015 has revealed that there is 1 NPDES site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation ____________________ FLEENOR INC Facility Status: ACTIVE KY DES #: KYG046175 Address ________ MILL BRANCH W/KY RT Direction / Distance ___________________ Map _____ID Page _____ NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.119 mi.) D10 13 TC4327237.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 2 records. Site Name ____________ Database(s) ____________ ROXANA BP GENTRY UST, PSTEAF SB193 TC4327237.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 EDR Inc. EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Database Search Distance (Miles) Target Property >1 Total Plotted < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 NR 0 0 NR 0 0 0 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.750 0.750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0.750 0.750 0.750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR 1 0 0 2 0 0 NR NR 2 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL Proposed NPL NPL LIENS 1.250 1.250 0.250 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS FEDERAL FACILITY Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP 0.750 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.250 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.750 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA-SQG RCRA-CESQG 0.500 0.500 0.500 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS US INST CONTROL LUCIS Federal ERNS list ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS 1.250 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.750 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists SB193 PSTEAF INDIAN LUST 0.750 0.750 0.750 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST 0.500 TC4327237.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Database Search Distance (Miles) INDIAN UST FEMA UST 0.500 0.500 Target Property >1 Total Plotted < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0.250 0.250 0.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 1 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 11 NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS INST CONTROL 0.500 0.750 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP VCP 0.750 0.750 State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS 0.750 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.750 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI DEBRIS REGION 9 HIST LF SWRCY INDIAN ODI 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL CDL US HIST CDL Local Land Records LIENS 2 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS SPILLS 0.250 0.250 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR DOT OPS DOD FUDS CONSENT ROD UMTRA US MINES 0.500 0.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 0.750 0.500 TC4327237.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Database Search Distance (Miles) TRIS TSCA FTTS HIST FTTS SSTS ICIS PADS MLTS RADINFO FINDS RAATS RMP UIC DRYCLEANERS NPDES AIRS LEAD INDIAN RESERV SCRD DRYCLEANERS Financial Assurance COAL ASH LEAD SMELTERS US AIRS EPA WATCH LIST US FIN ASSUR COAL ASH EPA PCB TRANSFORMER COAL ASH DOE 2020 COR ACTION PRP 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.250 1.250 0.750 0.250 0.750 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.750 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250 Target Property >1 Total Plotted < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 0 NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 11 0 1 26 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR US Hist Auto Stat EDR US Hist Cleaners 1.250 0.500 0.500 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS RGA LF - Totals -- 0.250 0.250 0 13 1 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC4327237.2s Page 6 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site A1 BIG OAK COAL COMPANY < 1/8 1 ft. LETCHER (County), KY Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number US MINES 1011166739 N/A US MINES 1011166662 N/A US MINES 1016478219 N/A Site 1 of 2 in cluster A Relative: Higher Actual: 1422 ft. US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: A2 MARIE ENTERPRISES INC < 1/8 1 ft. LETCHER (County), KY 1516077 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 2 BIG OAK COAL COMPANY D 19890222 Coal Mining 0 0 37 05 51 082 57 24 Site 2 of 2 in cluster A Relative: Higher Actual: 1431 ft. US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 3 LANCE COAL CORP < 1/8 1 ft. LETCHER (County), KY Relative: Higher Actual: 1561 ft. US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1516000 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 1 MINE MARIE ENTERPRISES INC D 19890202 Coal Mining 0 0 37 05 51 082 57 24 1503494 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 1 STRIP MINE LANCE COAL CORP D 19800425 Coal Mining 0 0 00 00 00 000 00 00 TC4327237.2s Page 7 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site 4 MEADE & SHEPHERD COAL COMPANY INC < 1/8 1 ft. LETCHER (County), KY Relative: Higher Actual: 1714 ft. MAP FINDINGS Database(s) US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: B5 NNE < 1/8 0.014 mi. 76 ft. LEE GENTRY PROPERTY HWY 588 W ROXANA, KY 41848 Relative: Lower UST: Sequence Id: Facility ID: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner Address2: Owner Address3: Owner City,St,Zip: Internal Document ID: Latitude: Longitude: Actual: 1067 ft. EDR ID Number EPA ID Number US MINES 1016483514 N/A UST U003201172 N/A 1516361 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 ROXANA #2 MEADE & SHEPHERD COAL COMPANY INC D 19910123 Coal Mining 0 0 37 06 11 082 57 20 Site 1 of 2 in cluster B Subject Item Id: Tank Status: Inert Material Code: Tank Material: Installation Date: Closed In Place Date: Removed Date: Capacity in Gallons: Change in Service Date: Tank Pit Num: Compartment Num: Tank Substance: Tank Mfg Code: Tank Release Detection: Tank Internal Protection: Tank Overfill Protection: Last Tank Test Date: Relined Date: Lining Insp Date: Piping Installation Date: Pipe Type: Pipe Material: Pipe External Protection: Pipe Release Detection: 7630067 59894 Lee Gentry 1052 Carpenters Trace Not reported Not reported Villa Hills, KY 410174412 0 37.109427 -82.951762 1 Tank removed/verified Not reported SINGLE WALL STEEL 01/01/1982 03/19/1997 03/31/1998 560 Not reported Not reported 1 DIESEL Not reported NON UNKNOWN Unknown Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Suction Single Wall Steel None None TC4327237.2s Page 8 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) LEE GENTRY PROPERTY (Continued) B6 NE < 1/8 0.038 mi. 202 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1034 ft. Pipe Rel Detect Suc Code: Pipe Leak Detect Code: Last Contained Date: Pipe Mfg Code: Last Pipe Test Date: Last CP Test Date: Added To Flex Date: Added To Piping Date: Added To Tank Date: NON NA Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Subject Item Id: Tank Status: Inert Material Code: Tank Material: Installation Date: Closed In Place Date: Removed Date: Capacity in Gallons: Change in Service Date: Tank Pit Num: Compartment Num: Tank Substance: Tank Mfg Code: Tank Release Detection: Tank Internal Protection: Tank Overfill Protection: Last Tank Test Date: Relined Date: Lining Insp Date: Piping Installation Date: Pipe Type: Pipe Material: Pipe External Protection: Pipe Release Detection: Pipe Rel Detect Suc Code: Pipe Leak Detect Code: Last Contained Date: Pipe Mfg Code: Last Pipe Test Date: Last CP Test Date: Added To Flex Date: Added To Piping Date: Added To Tank Date: 2 Tank removed/verified Not reported SINGLE WALL STEEL 01/01/1982 03/19/1997 03/31/1998 1000 Not reported Not reported 1 GASOLINE Not reported NON UNKNOWN Unknown Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Suction Single Wall Steel Unknown None NON NA Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported ROXANNE BP US HWY 160 S ROXANA, KY EDR ID Number EPA ID Number U003201172 SB193 U003132084 N/A Site 2 of 2 in cluster B KY SENATE BILL 193 INVENTORY: KY SENATE BILL 193 INVENTORY: SIW Facility ID: 6892067 Soil / Groundwater: Soil and Groundwater Agency Interest Number: 59860 TC4327237.2s Page 9 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation C7 SSW < 1/8 0.074 mi. 393 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1355 ft. C8 SSW < 1/8 0.079 mi. 419 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1321 ft. MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) BLACKEY ELKHORN COAL CORP US MINES 1011161628 N/A US MINES 1011160858 N/A UST U001624007 N/A LETCHER (County), KY Site 1 of 2 in cluster C US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1510956 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 FROG POND TIPPLE BLACKEY ELKHORN COAL CORP D 19831007 Coal Mining 0 0 37 05 30 082 57 29 C & O COAL COMPANY INC LETCHER (County), KY Site 2 of 2 in cluster C US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 9 East < 1/8 0.115 mi. 608 ft. JOHN W ISON GROCERY 14858 HWY 160 WHITESBURG, KY 41858 Relative: Lower UST: Sequence Id: Facility ID: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner Address2: Owner Address3: Owner City,St,Zip: Internal Document ID: Latitude: Longitude: Actual: 1054 ft. EDR ID Number EPA ID Number Subject Item Id: Tank Status: 1510186 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 1 TIPPLE C & O COAL COMPANY INC D 19900430 Coal Mining 0 0 37 05 30 082 57 29 5542067 59891 John Ison 14858 HWY 160 Not reported Not reported Linefork, KY 41833 0 37.1356 -82.816 1 Tank removed/verified TC4327237.2s Page 10 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) JOHN W ISON GROCERY (Continued) Inert Material Code: Tank Material: Installation Date: Closed In Place Date: Removed Date: Capacity in Gallons: Change in Service Date: Tank Pit Num: Compartment Num: Tank Substance: Tank Mfg Code: Tank Release Detection: Tank Internal Protection: Tank Overfill Protection: Last Tank Test Date: Relined Date: Lining Insp Date: Piping Installation Date: Pipe Type: Pipe Material: Pipe External Protection: Pipe Release Detection: Pipe Rel Detect Suc Code: Pipe Leak Detect Code: Last Contained Date: Pipe Mfg Code: Last Pipe Test Date: Last CP Test Date: Added To Flex Date: Added To Piping Date: Added To Tank Date: Not reported SINGLE WALL STEEL 01/01/1950 Not reported 07/23/1994 1000 Not reported Not reported 1 GASOLINE Not reported NON NA Unknown Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Suction Single Wall Steel None None NON NA Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Subject Item Id: Tank Status: Inert Material Code: Tank Material: Installation Date: Closed In Place Date: Removed Date: Capacity in Gallons: Change in Service Date: Tank Pit Num: Compartment Num: Tank Substance: Tank Mfg Code: Tank Release Detection: Tank Internal Protection: Tank Overfill Protection: Last Tank Test Date: Relined Date: Lining Insp Date: Piping Installation Date: Pipe Type: Pipe Material: Pipe External Protection: Pipe Release Detection: Pipe Rel Detect Suc Code: 4 Tank removed/verified Not reported SINGLE WALL STEEL 05/01/1994 Not reported 01/29/2014 3000 Not reported Not reported 1 GASOLINE STI INV RECORDS/TANK TIGHTNESS TEST NA Automatic Shutoff Device 02/18/2010 Not reported Not reported Not reported Suction Single Wall Steel Coating and Cathodic Protection None CKV EDR ID Number EPA ID Number U001624007 TC4327237.2s Page 11 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) JOHN W ISON GROCERY (Continued) Pipe Leak Detect Code: Last Contained Date: Pipe Mfg Code: Last Pipe Test Date: Last CP Test Date: Added To Flex Date: Added To Piping Date: Added To Tank Date: NA Not reported STU Not reported 09/14/2010 Not reported 02/24/2007 02/24/2007 Subject Item Id: Tank Status: Inert Material Code: Tank Material: Installation Date: Closed In Place Date: Removed Date: Capacity in Gallons: Change in Service Date: Tank Pit Num: Compartment Num: Tank Substance: Tank Mfg Code: Tank Release Detection: Tank Internal Protection: Tank Overfill Protection: Last Tank Test Date: Relined Date: Lining Insp Date: Piping Installation Date: Pipe Type: Pipe Material: Pipe External Protection: Pipe Release Detection: Pipe Rel Detect Suc Code: Pipe Leak Detect Code: Last Contained Date: Pipe Mfg Code: Last Pipe Test Date: Last CP Test Date: Added To Flex Date: Added To Piping Date: Added To Tank Date: 3 Tank removed/verified Not reported SINGLE WALL STEEL 05/01/1994 Not reported 01/29/2014 3000 Not reported Not reported 1 GASOLINE STI INV RECORDS/TANK TIGHTNESS TEST NA Automatic Shutoff Device 02/18/2010 Not reported Not reported Not reported Suction Single Wall Steel Coating and Cathodic Protection None CKV NA Not reported STU Not reported 09/14/2010 Not reported 02/24/2007 02/24/2007 Subject Item Id: Tank Status: Inert Material Code: Tank Material: Installation Date: Closed In Place Date: Removed Date: Capacity in Gallons: Change in Service Date: Tank Pit Num: Compartment Num: Tank Substance: Tank Mfg Code: Tank Release Detection: 2 Tank removed/verified Not reported SINGLE WALL STEEL 01/01/1978 Not reported 07/23/1994 2000 Not reported Not reported 1 GASOLINE Not reported NON EDR ID Number EPA ID Number U001624007 TC4327237.2s Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) JOHN W ISON GROCERY (Continued) Tank Internal Protection: Tank Overfill Protection: Last Tank Test Date: Relined Date: Lining Insp Date: Piping Installation Date: Pipe Type: Pipe Material: Pipe External Protection: Pipe Release Detection: Pipe Rel Detect Suc Code: Pipe Leak Detect Code: Last Contained Date: Pipe Mfg Code: Last Pipe Test Date: Last CP Test Date: Added To Flex Date: Added To Piping Date: Added To Tank Date: D10 NNW < 1/8 0.119 mi. 628 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1028 ft. EDR ID Number EPA ID Number U001624007 NA Automatic Shutoff Device Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Suction Single Wall Steel None None NON NA Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported FLEENOR INC MILL BRANCH W/KY RT 2036 ROXANA, KY 41848 NPDES S108760827 N/A Site 1 of 4 in cluster D NPDES: Federal Facility ID: Facility Status: KY DES #: Total App# Design Flow (MGD): Horizontal Collect Method Desc: Facility Addr 2: Inactive Date: Design Capacity: Fee Category: SIC Code: Lat/Long: Lat/Long Method: USGS Hydrologic Basin Code: Facility Stream Segment: Facility Mileage Indicator: Basin Code: Basin Code Description: DMR Contact: Contact Telephone: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Permit Issued: Permit Expires: SIC Code Description: Reveiving Waters: Major/Minor: Effective Date: Affiliation Type Desc: Organization Formal Name: Facility Type Desc: Not reported ACTIVE KYG046175 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 1221 +3706480 / -08257320 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported PO BOX 100 Not reported ASHCAMP, KY 41512 07/01/2009 07/31/2014 BITUMINOUS COAL & LIG, SURFACE MILL BR / NORTH FORK / KY RIVER MINOR Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported TC4327237.2s Page 13 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) FLEENOR INC (Continued) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number S108760827 State Facility ID: Not reported Original Issue Date: Not reported Approved For Electronic DMR Submission: Not reported D11 NNW < 1/8 0.119 mi. 628 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1028 ft. FLEENOR INC US MINES 1010015878 N/A LETCHER (County), KY Site 2 of 4 in cluster D US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1519050 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 MILL BRANCH OPERATION MINE NO 1 FLEENOR INC D 20121127 Coal Mining 0 0 37 06 47 082 57 31 Violations Details: Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8229586 12/15/2009 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 12/15/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8229583 12/10/2009 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 12/11/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: 8229584 12/10/2009 Abandoned TC4327237.2s Page 14 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) FLEENOR INC (Continued) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1010015878 Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 11/27/2012 104(a) 12/11/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219473 12/03/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 12/03/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219471 12/01/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 12/03/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219469 12/01/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 12/03/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 TC4327237.2s Page 15 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) FLEENOR INC (Continued) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1010015878 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219470 12/01/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 12/01/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219472 12/01/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 12/01/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8229574 11/04/2009 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 11/04/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: 8229573 11/03/2009 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 11/04/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed TC4327237.2s Page 16 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) FLEENOR INC (Continued) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1010015878 Assessment Amount: Year: 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219029 09/08/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/11/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219196 09/08/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/08/2008 Citation Y 207.00 207.00 Closed Proposed 207.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219192 09/05/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/08/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: 8219193 09/05/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/11/2008 Citation N 100.00 TC4327237.2s Page 17 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) FLEENOR INC (Continued) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1010015878 Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219194 09/05/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/08/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219190 09/05/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/08/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219191 09/05/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/08/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: 8219195 09/05/2008 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/11/2008 TC4327237.2s Page 18 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) FLEENOR INC (Continued) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1010015878 Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 6646632 09/05/2007 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/05/2007 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2007 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 6646629 08/29/2007 Abandoned 11/27/2012 104(a) 09/05/2007 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2007 TC4327237.2s Page 19 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) FLEENOR INC (Continued) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1010015878 Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 23 additional US_MINES: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. D12 NNW < 1/8 0.119 mi. 628 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1028 ft. MILL BRANCH PROCESSING INC US MINES 1011169733 N/A PIKE (County), KY Site 3 of 4 in cluster D US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1519140 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 AUGER NO 1 SN #11 MILL BRANCH PROCESSING INC D 20131119 Coal Mining 0 0 37 06 47 082 57 31 Violations Details: Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219477 12/24/2008 Abandoned 11/19/2013 104(g)(1) 12/30/2008 Order N 112.00 112.00 Closed Proposed 112.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219475 12/23/2008 Abandoned 11/19/2013 104(a) 01/05/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: 8219476 12/23/2008 Abandoned 11/19/2013 TC4327237.2s Page 20 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) MILL BRANCH PROCESSING INC (Continued) D13 NNW < 1/8 0.119 mi. 628 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1028 ft. Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 104(a) 01/05/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219028 09/05/2008 Abandoned 11/19/2013 104(a) 09/08/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8239547 06/01/2010 Abandoned 11/19/2013 104(a) 06/07/2010 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2010 W & F CONTRACT AUGERING INC. EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1011169733 US MINES 1011169521 N/A LETCHER (County), KY Site 4 of 4 in cluster D US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: 1519060 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 #2 W & F CONTRACT AUGERING INC. C 20070607 Coal Mining 0 0 37 06 47 TC4327237.2s Page 21 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) W & F CONTRACT AUGERING INC. (Continued) Longitude: EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1011169521 082 57 31 Violations Details: Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 6645624 02/08/2007 Abandoned 01/13/2015 104(a) 02/14/2007 Citation N 60.00 0.00 Received Proposed 60.00 2007 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7436923 01/09/2007 Abandoned 01/13/2015 104(a) 01/11/2007 Citation N 60.00 0.00 Received Proposed 60.00 2007 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7436922 01/09/2007 Abandoned 01/13/2015 104(a) 06/06/2007 Citation N 60.00 0.00 Received Proposed 60.00 2007 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: 7436921 01/08/2007 Abandoned 01/13/2015 104(a) 01/11/2007 Citation N 60.00 TC4327237.2s Page 22 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) W & F CONTRACT AUGERING INC. (Continued) Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 0.00 Received Proposed 60.00 2007 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7436918 01/04/2007 Abandoned 01/13/2015 104(a) 01/05/2007 Citation N 60.00 0.00 Received Proposed 60.00 2007 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7436917 01/04/2007 Abandoned 01/13/2015 104(a) 01/05/2007 Citation N 60.00 0.00 Received Proposed 60.00 2007 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7436919 01/04/2007 Abandoned 01/13/2015 104(a) 01/08/2007 Citation N 60.00 0.00 Received Proposed 60.00 2007 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1011169521 TC4327237.2s Page 23 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 14 WSW 1/8-1/4 0.161 mi. 850 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1116 ft. MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) SPILLS Relative: Lower Actual: 1253 ft. S117080685 N/A ROXANA, KY SPILLS: Facility Status: Incident Type: Program Code: Received By Staff: Received Date: Report Date: Dispatch Description: Source Name: Source Address: Substances: Other Substances Desc: Media Impacted: Inc ID: Lead Invest Person ID: Compliance: Notification: Priority: Incident End Date: Follow Up Priority Desc: Most Recent Comp Eval Activity: Most Recent ENF Activity: Begin Emergency Date: End Emergency Date: MARS Function Code: Locked: Closure Type Desc: Latitude: Longitude: E15 SSW 1/4-1/2 0.284 mi. 1501 ft. EDR ID Number EPA ID Number Env. Closed SOIL CONTAMINATION Not reported Rader, Andrea 08/16/2004 8/16/04 10:20 coal company oiling haul road Not reported turn on 160 at Action Auto Supply, go across RR tracks and bridge, turn right, take first dirt road, when it splits stay left Not reported Not reported Solid Waste 184378 9448 Yes No Routine Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 37.104056 -82.962444 ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORP US MINES 1016484115 N/A LETCHER (County), KY Site 1 of 2 in cluster E US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: Violations Details: Violation Number: Date Issued: 1518096 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 MINE #1 ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORP D 20090930 Coal Mining 0 0 37 05 19 082 57 39 7418987 09/01/2005 TC4327237.2s Page 24 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORP (Continued) Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 09/08/2005 Citation N 60.00 60.00 Closed Proposed 60.00 2005 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7418986 08/30/2005 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 09/01/2005 Citation N 60.00 60.00 Closed Proposed 60.00 2005 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7418985 08/30/2005 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 09/01/2005 Citation N 60.00 60.00 Closed Proposed 60.00 2005 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7401045 08/20/2003 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 08/21/2003 Citation N 60.00 60.00 Closed Proposed 60.00 2003 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016484115 TC4327237.2s Page 25 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORP (Continued) Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7391043 08/07/2002 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 08/07/2002 Citation N 55.00 55.00 Closed Proposed 55.00 2002 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7391045 08/07/2002 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 08/12/2002 Citation N 55.00 55.00 Closed Proposed 55.00 2002 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7391044 08/07/2002 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 08/15/2002 Citation N 55.00 55.00 Closed Proposed 55.00 2002 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: 7391042 08/07/2002 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 08/07/2002 Citation N 55.00 55.00 Closed Proposed EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016484115 TC4327237.2s Page 26 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORP (Continued) Assessment Amount: Year: 55.00 2002 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7391041 08/07/2002 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 08/07/2002 Citation N 55.00 55.00 Closed Proposed 55.00 2002 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7390858 07/31/2002 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 07/31/2002 Citation N 55.00 55.00 Closed Proposed 55.00 2002 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 7390859 07/31/2002 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 08/07/2002 Citation N 55.00 55.00 Closed Proposed 55.00 2002 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: 7435968 06/13/2006 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 06/13/2006 Citation N 60.00 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016484115 TC4327237.2s Page 27 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORP (Continued) Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 60.00 Closed Proposed 60.00 2006 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 6645473 05/10/2007 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 05/14/2007 Citation Y 127.00 127.00 Closed Proposed 127.00 2007 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 6645474 05/10/2007 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 05/10/2007 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2007 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 6647109 03/25/2008 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 03/25/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: 8220439 03/23/2009 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 03/23/2009 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016484115 TC4327237.2s Page 28 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORP (Continued) Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8220437 03/23/2009 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 03/23/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8220438 03/23/2009 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 03/23/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8220436 03/16/2009 Abandoned 09/30/2009 104(a) 03/31/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: 7418131 03/14/2005 Abandoned EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016484115 TC4327237.2s Page 29 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORP (Continued) Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016484115 09/30/2009 104(a) 03/17/2005 Citation N 60.00 60.00 Closed Proposed 60.00 2005 Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 12 additional US_MINES: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. E16 SSW 1/4-1/2 0.284 mi. 1501 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1253 ft. ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORPORATION US MINES 1016151411 N/A LETCHER (County), KY Site 2 of 2 in cluster E US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1519428 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 MINE #1 ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORPORATION D 20130102 Coal Mining 0 0 37 04 13 082 55 28 Violations Details: Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: 8229642 11/02/2009 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 11/06/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 TC4327237.2s Page 30 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORPORATION (Continued) Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8229643 11/02/2009 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 11/06/2009 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2009 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8255898 09/14/2011 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 09/20/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8255897 09/14/2011 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 09/20/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: 8255896 09/13/2011 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 09/14/2011 Citation EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016151411 TC4327237.2s Page 31 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORPORATION (Continued) Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8250286 09/09/2010 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 09/14/2010 Citation Y 190.00 190.00 Closed Proposed 190.00 2010 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8250287 09/09/2010 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 09/14/2010 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2010 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8251319 03/28/2011 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 03/28/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: 8251318 03/18/2011 Abandoned 01/02/2013 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016151411 TC4327237.2s Page 32 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) ASHER’S QUALITY COAL CORPORATION (Continued) 17 East 1/4-1/2 0.294 mi. 1553 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1029 ft. Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 104(a) 03/22/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8251307 02/28/2011 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 03/28/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8239474 02/24/2010 Abandoned 01/02/2013 104(a) 02/24/2010 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2010 SOUTH EAST COAL SALES EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016151411 US MINES 1016479565 N/A LETCHER (County), KY US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: 1505887 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 RED FOX TARTAN SOUTH EAST COAL SALES D 19800502 Coal Mining 0 0 00 00 00 TC4327237.2s Page 33 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) SOUTH EAST COAL SALES (Continued) Longitude: 18 ENE 1/4-1/2 0.300 mi. 1586 ft. WHITESBURG COAL INC Relative: Lower US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: Actual: 1126 ft. 19 SW 1/4-1/2 0.376 mi. 1987 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1526 ft. 20 North 1/4-1/2 0.393 mi. 2075 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1421 ft. EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1016479565 000 00 00 US MINES 1011160830 N/A US MINES 1016480926 N/A US MINES 1011169692 N/A LETCHER (County), KY 1510158 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 3 PROCESSING PLANT WHITESBURG COAL INC D 19850416 Coal Mining 0 0 37 06 29 082 56 39 MEADE & SHEPHERD COAL COMPANY INC LETCHER (County), KY US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1508321 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 2 SURFACE MEADE & SHEPHERD COAL COMPANY INC D 19850522 Coal Mining 0 0 37 05 36 082 57 56 BUBS CONTRACTING INC LETCHER (County), KY US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: 1519095 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 AUGER NO 1 S/N 116 BUBS CONTRACTING INC C 20070816 Coal Mining 0 TC4327237.2s Page 34 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) BUBS CONTRACTING INC (Continued) Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: Relative: Higher Actual: 1530 ft. 22 North 1/4-1/2 0.439 mi. 2318 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1468 ft. 1011169692 0 37 07 06 082 57 23 Violations Details: Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 21 South 1/4-1/2 0.411 mi. 2171 ft. EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 6646306 07/26/2007 Abandoned 12/31/2014 104(a) 08/23/2007 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2007 COAL MOLE INC US MINES 1011167616 N/A US MINES 1015766237 N/A LETCHER (County), KY US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1516959 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 3 COAL MOLE INC D 19960723 Coal Mining 0 0 37 05 17 082 57 06 CLARK MINING, INC. LETCHER (County), KY US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: 1519309 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 #3 CLARK MINING, INC. D 20120329 Coal Mining 0 0 37 07 08 TC4327237.2s Page 35 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) CLARK MINING, INC. (Continued) Longitude: EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1015766237 082 57 10 Violations Details: Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8267840 12/27/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(b) 02/23/2012 Order Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219716 12/23/2008 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/30/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219715 12/23/2008 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/30/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: 8219714 12/23/2008 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 314(b) 12/23/2008 Safeguard Not reported Not reported TC4327237.2s Page 36 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) CLARK MINING, INC. (Continued) Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219887 12/23/2008 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/30/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219886 12/23/2008 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/30/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8267838 12/22/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/22/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: 8267839 12/22/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/27/2011 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1015766237 TC4327237.2s Page 37 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) CLARK MINING, INC. (Continued) Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219713 12/22/2008 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/23/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219711 12/22/2008 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/30/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8219710 12/22/2008 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/22/2008 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: 8219712 12/22/2008 Abandoned and Sealed EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1015766237 TC4327237.2s Page 38 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) CLARK MINING, INC. (Continued) Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/30/2008 Citation N 150.00 150.00 Closed Proposed 150.00 2008 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8267837 12/20/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/22/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8267836 12/20/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/22/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8267830 12/19/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/19/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1015766237 TC4327237.2s Page 39 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) CLARK MINING, INC. (Continued) Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8267831 12/19/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/19/2011 Citation Y 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8267832 12/19/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/22/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8267833 12/19/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/20/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: 8267834 12/19/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) 12/22/2011 Citation N 100.00 100.00 Closed Proposed EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1015766237 TC4327237.2s Page 40 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) CLARK MINING, INC. (Continued) Assessment Amount: Year: 100.00 2011 Violation Number: Date Issued: Mine Status: Status Date: Action Type: Date Abated: Citation/Order: Sig and Sub Designation: Proposed Penalty: Paid Penalty: Assessment Status code: Assess. Case Status code: Assessment Amount: Year: 8267835 12/19/2011 Abandoned and Sealed 03/29/2012 104(a) Not reported Citation N 112.00 112.00 Closed Proposed 112.00 2011 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1015766237 TC4327237.2s Page 41 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) CLARK MINING, INC. (Continued) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1015766237 Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 263 additional US_MINES: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. F23 ENE 1/4-1/2 0.480 mi. 2532 ft. WHITESBURG COAL INC Relative: Higher US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: Actual: 1392 ft. F24 ENE 1/4-1/2 0.480 mi. 2533 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1392 ft. 25 SW 1/4-1/2 0.498 mi. 2630 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 1768 ft. US MINES 1016481877 N/A US MINES 1011159923 N/A US MINES 1011158801 N/A LETCHER (County), KY Site 1 of 2 in cluster F 1510171 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 1 PROCESSING PLANT WHITESBURG COAL INC D 19850416 Coal Mining 0 0 37 06 38 082 56 33 LAKE COAL COMPANY INC LETCHER (County), KY Site 2 of 2 in cluster F US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 1512240 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 4 SURFACE MINE LAKE COAL COMPANY INC D 19810301 Coal Mining 0 0 00 00 00 000 00 00 K C COAL COMPANY INC LETCHER (County), KY US MINES: Mine ID: SIC code(s): Entity name: Company: Status: Status date: Operation Class: 1508111 122200 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 NO 3 MINE K C COAL COMPANY INC D 19791111 Coal Mining TC4327237.2s Page 42 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site Database(s) K C COAL COMPANY INC (Continued) Number of shops: Number of plants: Latitude: Longitude: 26 NNW >1 1.215 mi. 6415 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1014 ft. Closure Date: Longitude: Latitude: Subject Item County: Sub Item Longitude: Sub Item Latitude: Subject Item Address: Subject Item Address2: Subject Item City,St,Zip: Regulatory Desc: Closure Option: Side SG: 1011158801 0 0 00 00 00 000 00 00 KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA GAS PIPELINE NONE META, KY 41501 SHWS: Facility Id: Status: Description: EDR ID Number EPA ID Number SHWS S107467214 N/A 1242 Closed WELL LINE W-837 / KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA GAS (Closed: Restored 06/16/1995) 06/16/1995 -82.9661 37.128333 Not Yet Determined -82.5188 37.47917 Gas Pipeline Not reported Statewide, KY 41653 State Superfund Option C Restored 38140 TC4327237.2s Page 43 Count: 2 records. ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDR ID Site Name ROXANA ROXANA S105701677 GENTRY U004179726 ROXANA BP Site Address Zip Database(s) HWY 588 W US HWY 160 S 41848 41848 SB193 UST, PSTEAF TC4327237.2s Page 44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 Telephone 312-886-6686 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4327237.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC4327237.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: State Leads List State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 03/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4327237.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: Solid Waste Facilities List Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/23/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal leaking storage tank lists SB193: SB193 Branch Site Inventory List The inventory indicates facilities that have performed permanent closure activities at a regulated underground storage tank facility and have known soil and/or groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: 09/05/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2006 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-5981 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PSTEAF: Facility Ranking List The Underground Storage Tank Branch (USTB) has ranked all PSTEAF reimbursable facilities requiring corrective action, in accordance with 401 KAR 42:290. Directive letters will be issued on the basis of facility ranking and available PSTEAF funding in sequential order as ranked. For example, Rank 2 facilities will be issued directives before Rank 3 facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-5981 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 184 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. TC4327237.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 01/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 01/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 02/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/04/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-5981 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4327237.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12/14/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 271 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/29/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Site Listing A listing of sites that use engineering controls. Date of Government Version: 03/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INST CONTROL: State Superfund Database A list of closed sites in the State Superfund Database. Institutional controls would be in place at any site that uses Contained or Managed as a Closure Option. Date of Government Version: 03/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites Sites that have been accepted into the Voluntary Cleanup Program or have submitted an application. Date of Government Version: 03/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 04/02/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Kentucky Brownfield Inventory The Kentucky Brownfield Program has created an inventory of brownfield sites in order to market the properties to those interested in brownfield redevelopment. The Kentucky Brownfield Program is working to promote the redevelopment of these sites by helping to remove barriers that prevent reuse, providing useful information to communities, developers and the public and encouraging a climate that fosters redevelopment of contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 05/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Division of Compliance Assistance Telephone: 502-564-0323 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4327237.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycling Facilities A listing of recycling facilities located in the state of Kentucky. Date of Government Version: 04/07/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LF: Historical Landfills This solid waste facility listing contains detail information that is not included in the landfill listing. A listing with detail information is no longer available by the Department of Environmental Protection. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2006 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drub Lab Location Listing Clandestine drug lab site locations. Date of Government Version: 03/24/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually SPILLS: State spills A listing of spill and/or release related incidents. Date of Government Version: 05/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: DEP, Emergency Response Telephone: 502-564-2380 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 110 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC4327237.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4327237.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 04/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 01/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Telephone: (404) 562-9900 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. TC4327237.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Biennially UIC: UIC Information A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the Kentucky Oil & Gas Wells data base. Date of Government Version: 04/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Kentucky Geological Survey Telephone: 859-323-0544 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations. Date of Government Version: 11/26/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2014 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-573-3382 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: Permitted Facility Listing A listing of permitted wastewater facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-3410 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies AIRS: Permitted Airs Facility Listing A listing of permitted Airs facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-573-3382 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD: Environmental Lead Program Report Tracking Database Lead Report Tracking Database Date of Government Version: 08/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2014 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 502-564-4537 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC4327237.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4327237.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites A listing of coal ash pond site locations. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information. Date of Government Version: 04/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-6716 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 502-564-5981 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4327237.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: N/A EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. TC4327237.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014 Number of Days to Update: 186 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2014 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4327237.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2014 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4327237.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Certified Child Care Homes Source: Cabinet for Families & Children Telephone: 502-564-7130 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Polygon Features Source: Environmental Protection & Public Protection Cabinet Telephone: 502-564-5174 Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. TC4327237.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4327237.2s Page GR-23 GEOCHECK ®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ROXANA 8218 KENTUCKY 160 HALLIE, KY 41821 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 37.106 - 37˚ 6’ 21.60’’ 82.9544 - 82˚ 57’ 15.84’’ Zone 17 326333.4 4108215.2 1357 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Most Recent Revision: 37082-A8 ROXANA, KY 1976 EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC4327237.2s Page A-1 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General ENE 1805 1576 North 1456 1500 1532 1477 1605 1424 1357 1371 1332 1088 1044 1129 1221 1356 1447 1570 1698 Elevation (ft) SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES South 1578 1532 1353 West 1157 1044 1063 1131 1256 1283 1357 1473 1215 1136 1258 1381 1419 1548 1676 1676 Elevation (ft) TP East TP ✩ Target Property Elevation: 1357 ft. 0 1/2 1 Miles Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC4327237.2s Page A-2 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map Target Property County LETCHER, KY Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: 21133C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data Additional Panels in search area: Not Reported NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map NWI Quad at Target Property ROXANA HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. MAP ID Not Reported LOCATION FROM TP GENERAL DIRECTION GROUNDWATER FLOW TC4327237.2s Page A-3 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT Era: System: Series: Code: GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Paleozoic Category: Pennsylvanian Atokan and Morrowan Series PP1 (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Stratifed Sequence Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). TC4327237.2s Page A-4 3 4 4 1 4 2 1 3 5 1 1 0 EDR Inc. 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: Kaymine Soil Surface Texture: channery silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group 1 0 inches 14 inches channery silt loam 2 14 inches 79 inches very channery silt loam Granular materials (35 pct. or less passing No. 200), Silty, or Clayey Gravel and Sand. Granular materials (35 pct. or less passing No. 200), Silty, or Clayey Gravel and Sand. Unified Soil Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Gravels, Gravels with fines, Clayey Gravel Max: 42 Min: 4 Max: 7.8 Min: 5.6 COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Gravels, Gravels with fines, Clayey Gravel Max: 42 Min: 4 Max: 7.8 Min: 5.6 Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name: Fiveblock Soil Surface Texture: channery sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained TC4327237.2s Page A-6 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group 1 0 inches 14 inches channery sandy loam 2 14 inches 64 inches very channery sandy loam Granular materials (35 pct. or less passing No. 200), Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand. Granular materials (35 pct. or less passing No. 200), Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand. Unified Soil Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Silty Sand. Max: 141 Min: 42 Max: 7.8 Min: 5.6 COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Gravels, Gravels with fines, Silty Gravel Max: 141 Min: 42 Max: 7.8 Min: 5.6 Soil Map ID: 3 Soil Component Name: Shelocta Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4327237.2s Page A-7 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group 1 0 inches 3 inches silt loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. 2 3 inches 27 inches silt loam 3 27 inches 55 inches very channery silt loam 4 55 inches 66 inches weathered bedrock Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Clayey Soils. Not reported Unified Soil Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), Lean Clay. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), Lean Clay Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 6.5 Min: 4.5 Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 5.5 Min: 4.5 COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Gravels, Gravels with fines, Clayey Gravel Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 5.5 Min: 4.5 Not reported Max: Min: Max: Min: Soil Map ID: 4 Soil Component Name: Kimper Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4327237.2s Page A-8 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group 1 0 inches 5 inches silt loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. 2 5 inches 61 inches silt loam 3 61 inches 79 inches very channery loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Clayey Soils. Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. Unified Soil Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Clayey sand. COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Silty Sand. COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Clayey sand. Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 7.3 Min: 5.1 Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 6 Min: 4.5 COARSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Clayey sand. Max: 14 Min: 4 Max: 6 Min: 4.5 Soil Map ID: 5 Soil Component Name: Dekalb Soil Surface Texture: channery sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 64 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4327237.2s Page A-9 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group 1 0 inches 1 inches channery sandy loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. 2 1 inches 25 inches very channery sandy loam Silt-Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. 3 25 inches 29 inches unweathered bedrock Not reported Unified Soil FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), Lean Clay. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), Lean Clay. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. Not reported Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) Max: 141 Min: 42 Max: 5.5 Min: 3.6 Max: 141 Min: 42 Max: 5.5 Min: 3.6 Max: Min: Max: Min: LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) Federal USGS Federal FRDS PWS State Database 1.000 Nearest PWS within 1 mile 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION MAP ID A1 WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP USGS40000379988 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NE TC4327237.2s Page A-10 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION MAP ID A2 A3 4 B5 C6 C7 8 B9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP KY5000000022462 KY5000000022463 KY5000000022588 KY5000000022426 KY5000000022558 KY5000000022578 KY5000000022295 KY5000000022419 KY5000000022596 KY5000000022383 KY5000000022710 KY5000000022666 KY5000000022639 KY5000000022434 KY5000000022564 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile NE 1/2 - 1 Mile East 1/2 - 1 Mile North 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION MAP ID 1 2 3 4 5 A6 A7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP KYOG11000118694 KYOG11000111732 KYOG11000107465 KYOG11000012163 KYOG11000030241 KYOG11000107464 KYOG11000107726 KYOG11000112371 KYOG11000105483 KYOG11000111912 KYOG11000108808 KYOG11000105805 KYOG11000107862 KYOG11000112598 KYOG11000107461 KYOG11000060848 KYOG11000030236 0 - 1/8 Mile South 1/8 - 1/4 Mile NNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile North 1/2 - 1 Mile South 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile SE 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW TC4327237.2s Page A-11 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION MAP ID 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP KYOG11000115198 KYOG11000030242 KYOG11000110520 KYOG11000117930 KYOG11000109164 KYOG11000111733 KYOG11000113539 KYOG11000107140 KYOG11000107861 KYOG11000108810 KYOG11000022472 KYOG11000107143 1/2 - 1 Mile North 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile South 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile East 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile North 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile SW 1/2 - 1 Mile SE TC4327237.2s Page A-12 6 71 7 1 66 4 8 20 0 000 5 2 1 7 66 0 1 4 80 1 5 6 0 111 8 1 16 67 7 2 6 00 0 11 15 6 4080 00 6 1 3 4 10 14 4 85 2 00 0 6 0 04 00 1 1 6 0 80 1 6 0 0 1 5 2 0 1 48 0 00 11178 60 0 7 0 1 1 6 6 4 8 20 0 0 60 0 60 4 8 0 0 4 40 1 1 6 00 41 03 6 1 40 0 15 40 60 1 1 KY 1 1 1 11 44 4 6 05 5 2 8 0 06 0 0 0 00 1 2 1 2 40 1 0 48 0 7 6 1 1 66 1 12 0 40 20 48 0 0 0 28 6 3 0 20 2 00 1 17 6 8 1 6 0 0 0 1 15 4 2 84 04 00 0 11 4 31 1 1 8 1 7 1 8 40 0 20 0 800 1 40 1 7 11 6 0 6 68 0 1 80 1 2 1 24 0 1 38 0 120 4 0 1 40 8 0 1 6 1560 4 0 16 00 3 2 0 1 2 1 54 8 00 1 0 4 4 1 04 0 0 60 33 22 8 0 1 12 1 1 24 0 2 0 0 138 0 2 0 1 3 6 0 1 4 4 0 1 4 11 5 16 5 82 00 1 6 64 00 00 00 1 1 6 0 80 12 76 1 6 00 1 112 60 11 00 4 00 0 1 18 8 0 8 00 8 80 1 09 0 0 1 6 40 0 2 80 52 150 6 0 1 6 0 0 18 1 1 2 3 00 1 5 4 06 00 0 1 1 2 0 10 40 1 2 40 1 2 00 1 15 5 16 204 0 8 0 1 640 11 22 4 0 0 0 15201 5 6 0 11 1 67 2 6 8 00 1 3 6 0 16 1 7 2 0 2 60 0 6 0 17 1 4 11 44 8 0 0 04 0 15 2 0 0 16 0 1440 1 15 42 80 0 1 6 4 0 16 11 668 40 0 00 11 0 4 08 07 2 1 61 6 1 1560 18 15 1 6 4 0 1 40 0 1 1 2 0 00 4 02 12 40 10 80 10 112 40 04 0 1 0 8 0 1 6 4 0 1 5 6 0 1 5 20 1 4 8 0 1 4 4 0 11 4 0 3 60 0 1 31 11 2 11 122 048 00 6 00 6 4 20 0 5 1 2 8 0 1 31 3 2 0 6 10 4 11 20 1 3 1 1 3 6 02 0 1 4 4 0 0 1 5 2 8 0 0 13 1 61 1 13 05 06 0 4 4 0 6 0 1 3 60 2 24 1680 42 0 8 02 30 6 0 0 1 21 1 3 4 0 1 8 00 0 20 40 41 6 1 8 1 6 1 107 0 0 60 0 2 0 8 8 1 7 1 1 7 1 0 64 5 6 0 1 1 1 11 1 2 0 17 1 6 4 0 2 0 150 4 1 46 0 3 80 1 0 1 6 8 0 1840 40 18 11 87 06 00 1 1 31 1 4 30 6 02 20 8 0 0 1 5 1 24 8 0 1 1 1 66 05 6 0 0 4 00 1 3 6 0 1 32 0 60 15 15 60 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 40 1 1 1 5 2 0 11 5 6 0 1 66 04 00 11 3 2 3 6 00 1 2 1 40 1 2 10 20 4 0 1 4 0 0 12 1 4 0 2 1 11 2 0 1 2 8 0 6 00 0 4 0 4 1 1 5 6 0 1 8 4 0 1 8 00 08 1 11 21 0 6 8 0 0 00 13 20 1 04 6 0 0 80 1 1 5 466 0 5 0 14 1 4 8 00 0 0 0 14 0 1 7 66 18 0 07 2 0 17 1 5 2 0 0 1 2 0 11 80 8000 1 0 11 16 0 0 1 6 0 4 00 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 21 012 12 38 12 4 0 1040 1 2 4 0 1 3 16 30 2 0 1 4 40 0 1 1 5 42 08 0 0 06 2 1 41 3 1 1 4 4 0 15 2 0 0 40 10 40 1 0 1 0 8 0 1 1 6 0 1 12 38 02 0 1 3 60 0 1 14 184 404 00 1 15 2 0 5 6 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 8 0 1 0 4 0 0 10 1 4 8 0 1 0 2 00 1 1 2 24 8 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 4 4 11 4 8 0 6 0 1 5 1 55 2 6 00 1 12 1 60 1 1 5 6 0 1 4 00 06 0 0 4 33 2 11 00 82 8 0 10 80 0 4 10 01 11 12 6 0 5 0 64 4 01 12 12 1 14 0 11 55 2 4 0 0 111 44 6 2 00 3 11 32 8 04 00 0 1 1 21 2 0 1 1 2 600 1 1 44 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 4 1 2 8 00 1 3 62 0 1 3 1 14 4 0 4 0 0 1 20 1 1 4 8 0 20 36 4 EDR Inc. 41 06 80 1 2 2 0 13 4 58 2 00 1 4 40 00 0 1 3 2 0 1 14 3 6 1 2 8 0 1 2 4 0 1 2 0 0 00 0 11 33 62 0 1 4 4 01 4 0 1 4 1 5 28 0 1 5 2 0 00 131 6 6 6 0 15 6 0 20 11 232 48 00 11 2 0 0 840 601 20 1 7 8 7 8 40 06 0 00 1 11 1 11 5 6 1 1 80 1 62 0 11 77 16 08 00 1 3 1 2 8 0 1 17020 1 61 416 060 08 1 5 6 0 1 5 2 0 1 44 84 00 14 0 0 1 0 1 3 6 11 44 48 00 1 840 60 6 00 1 1 6 0 1 8 0 10 840 0 8 06 4 6 0 16 1 1 5 0 0 15020 4 84 00 0 1 00 16 20 11 5 5 1 11 4 1 40 14 0 16 0 4 04 0 3 60 0 3 2 0 11 12 2 8 40 0 0 2 28 0 20 00 0 4 6 1 13 80 1 4 0 0 13 46 0 16 80 1 160 1 0 1 28 2 0 1 1 20 3 0 6 0 1 31 4 1 1 2 18 2 0 0 0 60 11 1 1 1 2 11 2 00 68 0 0 1 4 4 1 4 44 00 0 1 1 3 6 0 20 1 3 40 12 80 1 4 4 0 11 43 06 00 1 61 05 0 6 0 5 0 20 1 4 8 0 80 1 46 0 10 6 060 20 0 0 17 6 0 40 08 0 1 7 6 1 1 16 61 6 1 8 1 15 2 14 4 8 00 140 1 4 1 33 06 0 1 22 00 8 80 1 22 0 1 3 1 4 4 0 20 0 60 00 1 14 5 1 14 33 20 0 1 82 4 1 7 20 0 1 11 16 2 0 1 4 8 0 1 1 6 68 4 0 1 7 6 00 1 1 8840 0 0 0 11 1 0 8 0 2 00 1 2 11 334 60 40 01 4 28 0 0 1 14 1 080 4 1 8 10 6 0 1 8 7 0 6 8 1 1 2 1 16 7 1 0 1 8 10 2 0 1 1 0 6 80 111 77 26 0 1 0 40 1 1 110 8 0 6 0 11 22 2 40 000 8 1 1 2 0 1 2 400 0 2 1 1 28 0 20 1 2 4 0 1 2 0 0 1 12 14 60 0 0 1 0 8 20 1 11 5 60 80 0 00 14 226 0 1 11 1 4 67 0 11 8 1 1 1 4 00 1 1 6 0 3 20 1 7 1 1 40 14 2 08 0 1 31 2 1 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 4 0080 041 80 14 0 28 1 13 4 13206 00 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 82 0 1 6 00 0 10 8 0 4 0 1 80 1 7 7 2060 1 1 68 40 1 4 1 13 1 4 40 0 14 0 1 4 81 0 1 65 6000 1 6 80 11 7 8 6 0 0 0 1 8 8 0 1 4 8 0 20 1 2 00 1 1 1 01 6 0 0 11 2 5 0 7 68 4 0 1 1 8 4 0 1 00 0 0 0 01 4 84 44 03 063 022 08 20 42 00 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 0 1 1 6 1 1 60 1 11 4 00 1 00 8 1 1 1 1 2 1 13 3 6 20 0 0 1 1 3 46 0 0 4 00 11 44 85 2 60 0 1 15 80 06 0 1 16 7 12 7 0 1 84 1 2 8 0 4 12 0 1 44 84 00 0 1 1 4 60 13 40 1 2 4 0 1 10 0 82 00 1 6 0 1 200 1 1 1 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation A1 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Huc code: Drainagearea Units: Contrib drainagearea units: Longitude: Horiz Acc measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: Aquifer type: Construction date: Welldepth units: Wellholedepth units: USGS-KY USGS Kentucky Water Science Center USGS-370634082570101 I28C0003 Well Not Reported 05100201 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Latitude: -82.9501616 Sourcemap scale: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: Interpolated from map NAD83 Vert measure val: feet Vertacc measure val: feet Interpolated from topographic map NGVD29 Countrycode: Not Reported Breathitt Formation Not Reported 19540901 Welldepth: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Database EDR ID Number FED USGS USGS40000379988 Not Reported Not Reported 37.1095401 24000 seconds 1050 20 US 43 Not Reported Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 A2 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 316495 37.10954 -82.95016 Not Reported Unknown KY5000000022462 Site type: Constructi: A3 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Water Well 30-DEC-99 KY WELLS 73314 37.10954 -82.95016 Not Reported Domestic KY5000000022463 Site type: Constructi: KY5000000022462 KY5000000022463 Water Well 30-DEC-99 TC4327237.2s Page A-14 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database 4 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 44408 37.11204 -82.9535 00028726 Domestic KY5000000022588 Site type: Constructi: B5 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: C6 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: C7 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: 8 East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Site type: Constructi: KY5000000022558 Water Well 28-SEP-95 KY WELLS 32129 37.11176 -82.94933 00003867 Domestic KY5000000022578 KY5000000022426 Water Well 17-OCT-88 KY WELLS 233309 37.11121 -82.94933 00043670 Domestic KY5000000022558 KY5000000022588 Water Well 06-APR-92 KY WELLS 36407 37.10899 -82.94739 00012966 Domestic KY5000000022426 EDR ID Number KY5000000022578 Water Well 01-JUN-87 KY WELLS KY5000000022295 TC4327237.2s Page A-15 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: 233287 37.10482 -82.94572 00033250 Industrial KY5000000022295 Site type: Constructi: B9 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 34233 37.10871 -82.94627 00009194 Domestic KY5000000022419 Site type: Constructi: 10 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: 33402 37.11204 -82.94683 00009934 Domestic KY5000000022596 Site type: Constructi: Site type: Constructi: 12 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: KY5000000022383 Water Well 30-DEC-99 KY WELLS 40281 37.1151 -82.95406 00017812 Public KY5000000022710 KY5000000022596 Water Well 17-DEC-87 KY WELLS 60813 37.10759 -82.94338 Not Reported Domestic KY5000000022383 KY5000000022419 Water Well 03-MAR-88 KY WELLS 11 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Water Well 02-SEP-93 KY5000000022710 Water Well 29-JUN-90 TC4327237.2s Page A-16 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database 13 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: KY WELLS 233335 37.11426 -82.96127 00043658 Domestic KY5000000022666 Site type: Constructi: 14 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: 15 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: 16 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Location i: North lati: West longi: Akgwa numb: Primary us: Site id: Site type: Constructi: KY5000000022434 Water Well 27-APR-88 KY WELLS 60842 37.11179 -82.96899 Not Reported Domestic KY5000000022564 KY5000000022639 Water Well 18-JUL-95 KY WELLS 34124 37.10899 -82.94099 00010733 Domestic KY5000000022434 KY5000000022666 Water Well 11-OCT-95 KY WELLS 233328 37.11371 -82.96378 00041301 Domestic KY5000000022639 EDR ID Number KY5000000022564 Water Well 30-DEC-99 TC4327237.2s Page A-17 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance 1 South 0 - 1/8 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 2 NNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 16133015500000 Kgs recno: H Number : 18 Fns: S Few: E Surf elev: ROXANA County: EQUITABLE PRODUCTION COMPANY ET AL CLEAN GAS, INC 301 Td: 341OHIO Deepst pay: Not Reported Org wclass: GAS Cmpl date: 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Cuttings: BC Plotsymbol: 104837 V 37.104336 -82.954635 37.104337 -82.954636 Site id: Database EDR ID Number OIL_GAS KYOG11000118694 137064 79 1579 1352 1532 LETCHER 4074 000 DEV 24-MAR-09 Not Reported 0 GAS KYOG11000118694 OIL_GAS KYOG11000111732 16133011110000 Kgs recno: 129852 H Number : 79 18 Fns: 2856 N Few: 1556 E Surf elev: 1436 ROXANA County: LETCHER ISON, RICHARD ESTATE CLEAN GAS, INC 150 Td: 3999 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 03-FEB-06 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 98511 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/9/R00129852/R00129852.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.108823 -82.955336 TC4327237.2s Page A-18 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 3 ENE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 4 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.108918 -82.95522 Site id: KYOG11000111732 OIL_GAS KYOG11000107465 16133007530000 Kgs recno: 125087 H Number : 79 18 Fns: 2533 S Few: 169 E Surf elev: 1319 ROXANA County: LETCHER MEADE, RONDAL & SHARON CLEAN GAS, INC SB-31 Td: 3936 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 27-MAY-04 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 94306 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/5/R00125087/R00125087.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.106957 -82.950579 37.107053 -82.950463 Site id: KYOG11000107465 OIL_GAS KYOG11000012163 16133008230000 Kgs recno: 12407 H Number : 79 18 Fns: 1950 S Few: 2250 W Surf elev: 1315 ROXANA County: LETCHER HOGG, GEORGE KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA GAS CO 7178 Td: 0 000 Deepst pay: 000 Not Reported Org wclass: UNC TRM Cmpl date: 30-DEC-99 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 Not Reported Plotsymbol: TRM 26332 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/0/1/2/R00012407/R00012407.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.105355 -82.958952 TC4327237.2s Page A-19 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 5 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: A6 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.105356 -82.958951 Site id: KYOG11000012163 OIL_GAS KYOG11000030241 16133001110000 Kgs recno: 31561 H Number : 79 18 Fns: 2275 S Few: 2025 W Surf elev: 1332 ROXANA County: LETCHER HOGG, GEORGE KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA GAS CO 7192 Td: 3860 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO 133 MCFGPD Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 22-JUN-73 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 Not Reported Plotsymbol: GAS 26638 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/0/3/1/R00031561/R00031561.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.106248 -82.959723 37.106343 -82.959607 Site id: KYOG11000030241 OIL_GAS KYOG11000107464 16133007520000 Kgs recno: 125086 H Number : 79 18 Fns: 579 S Few: 601 E Surf elev: 1530 ROXANA County: LETCHER MEADE, RONDAL & SHARON CLEAN GAS, INC SB-32 Td: 0 000 Deepst pay: 000 Not Reported Org wclass: UNC TRM Cmpl date: 30-DEC-99 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 Not Reported Plotsymbol: TRM 94305 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/5/R00125086/R00125086.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.10159 -82.952061 TC4327237.2s Page A-20 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: A7 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 8 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.101685 -82.951945 Site id: KYOG11000107464 OIL_GAS KYOG11000107726 16133007740000 Kgs recno: 125686 H Number : 79 18 Fns: 517 S Few: 706 E Surf elev: 1531 ROXANA County: LETCHER MEADE, RONDAL & SHARON CLEAN GAS, INC SB-32 Td: 4130 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 29-APR-04 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 94550 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/5/R00125686/R00125686.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.10142 -82.952421 37.101515 -82.952305 Site id: KYOG11000107726 OIL_GAS KYOG11000112371 16133011360000 Kgs recno: 130597 H Number : 79 18 Fns: 659 S Few: 2140 W Surf elev: 1510 ROXANA County: LETCHER EQUITABLE PRODUCTION COMPANY CLEAN GAS, INC 154 Td: 4057 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 01-JUN-06 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 99070 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/3/0/R00130597/R00130597.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.10181 -82.959328 TC4327237.2s Page A-21 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 9 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 10 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.101905 -82.959212 Site id: KYOG11000112371 OIL_GAS KYOG11000105483 16133006170000 Kgs recno: 123040 H Number : 79 18 Fns: 1391 N Few: 1197 E Surf elev: 1158 ROXANA County: LETCHER KRCC/EPC CLEAN GAS, INC SB-18 Td: 3704 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 03-JUL-01 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 DIL Plotsymbol: GAS 92487 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/3/R00123040/R00123040.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.112846 -82.954104 37.112942 -82.953988 Site id: KYOG11000105483 OIL_GAS KYOG11000111912 16133011150000 Kgs recno: 130035 H Number : 79 23 Fns: 604 N Few: 1727 E Surf elev: 1497 ROXANA County: LETCHER STAHL, THOMAS CLEAN GAS, INC 153 Td: 4072 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341HURNL Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 23-FEB-06 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 2399 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 98693 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/3/0/R00130035/R00130035.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.098341 -82.955921 TC4327237.2s Page A-22 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 11 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 12 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.098436 -82.955805 Site id: KYOG11000111912 OIL_GAS KYOG11000108808 16133009490000 Kgs recno: 126926 H Number : 79 19 Fns: 1450 S Few: 1602 W Surf elev: 1101 ROXANA County: LETCHER HOGG, IRA JR (HEIRS) CLEAN GAS, INC SB-54 Td: 3669 341OHIO Deepst pay: 340BBSI Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 04-JUN-04 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 95610 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/6/R00126926/R00126926.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.103982 -82.944507 37.104078 -82.944391 Site id: KYOG11000108808 OIL_GAS KYOG11000105805 16133006270000 Kgs recno: 123361 H Number : 79 19 Fns: 2334 N Few: 1369 W Surf elev: 1268 ROXANA County: LETCHER HOGG, RUTH CLEAN GAS, INC SB-17 Td: 3794 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 12-OCT-01 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 1798 DIL Plotsymbol: GAS 92586 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/3/R00123361/R00123361.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.110256 -82.945306 TC4327237.2s Page A-23 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 13 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 14 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.110352 -82.94519 Site id: KYOG11000105805 OIL_GAS KYOG11000107862 16133007800000 Kgs recno: 125822 H Number : 79 18 Fns: 861 N Few: 1957 W Surf elev: 1090 ROXANA County: LETCHER HAMPTON, JAMES CLEAN GAS, INC SB-38 Td: 3603 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO 350 MCFGPD Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 19-MAY-03 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 2013 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 94598 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/5/R00125822/R00125822.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.114302 -82.959958 37.114398 -82.959842 Site id: KYOG11000107862 OIL_GAS KYOG11000112598 16133011500000 Kgs recno: 130824 H Number : 79 23 Fns: 1260 N Few: 368 E Surf elev: 1846 ROXANA County: LETCHER GENTRY, LEE CLEAN GAS, INC 155 Td: 4403 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341HURNL Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 08-JUN-06 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 99287 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/3/0/R00130824/R00130824.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.096539 -82.951261 TC4327237.2s Page A-24 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 15 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 16 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.096634 -82.951145 Site id: KYOG11000112598 OIL_GAS KYOG11000107461 16133009300000 Kgs recno: 125083 H Number : 79 22 Fns: 614 N Few: 1008 W Surf elev: 1540 ROXANA County: LETCHER MEADE, RONDAL & SHARON CLEAN GAS, INC SB-33 Td: 4118 341OLNG Deepst pay: 341OHIO 0 MCFGPD Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 06-MAY-04 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 94272 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/5/R00125083/R00125083.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.098314 -82.946545 37.098409 -82.946429 Site id: KYOG11000107461 OIL_GAS KYOG11000060848 16133002140000 Kgs recno: 63892 H Number : 79 23 Fns: 1200 N Few: 2150 W Surf elev: 1489 ROXANA County: LETCHER GENTRY, DOUGLAS MAXON EXP & DEV CO 1 Td: 4000 341OHIO Deepst pay: 340BBSI Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 06-FEB-86 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 FDC Plotsymbol: GAS 70676 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/0/6/3/R00063892/R00063892.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.096704 -82.959296 TC4327237.2s Page A-25 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 37.096799 -82.95918 Site id: 17 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: OIL_GAS KYOG11000030236 16133001090000 Kgs recno: 31556 H Number : 79 17 Fns: 1160 S Few: 400 E Surf elev: 1463 ROXANA County: LETCHER ISON, ISAAC KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA GAS CO 7167 Td: 4017 355LCKP Deepst pay: 341OHIO 146 MCFGPD Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 20-OCT-72 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 FDC Plotsymbol: GAS 25952 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/0/3/1/R00031556/R00031556.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.103185 -82.968038 37.103186 -82.968038 Site id: KYOG11000030236 18 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: KYOG11000060848 OIL_GAS 16133013190000 Kgs recno: H Number : 13 Fns: S Few: E Surf elev: ROXANA County: EQUITABLE PRODUCTION COMPANY CLEAN GAS, INC 144 Td: 341OHIO Deepst pay: Not Reported Org wclass: GAS Cmpl date: 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Cuttings: BC Plotsymbol: 101494 V 37.11724 -82.951666 KYOG11000115198 133432 79 209 486 1198 LETCHER 3758 341OHIO DEV 21-JUN-07 Not Reported 0 GAS TC4327237.2s Page A-26 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 19 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 20 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.117241 -82.951667 Site id: KYOG11000115198 OIL_GAS KYOG11000030242 16133000770000 Kgs recno: 31562 H Number : 79 19 Fns: 350 N Few: 1010 W Surf elev: 1469 ROXANA County: LETCHER LEWIS, JOHN J KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA GAS CO 7101 Td: 3866 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO 61 MCFGPD Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 17-DEC-70 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 11883 Not Reported Plotsymbol: GAS 23786 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/0/3/1/R00031562/R00031562.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.115705 -82.946537 37.115801 -82.946421 Site id: KYOG11000030242 OIL_GAS KYOG11000110520 16133010440000 Kgs recno: 128638 H Number : 79 17 Fns: 2014 N Few: 461 E Surf elev: 1216 ROXANA County: LETCHER BEGLEY PROPERTIES, LLC CLEAN GAS, INC 114 Td: 3694 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 07-JUL-05 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 97294 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/8/R00128638/R00128638.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.111135 -82.968247 TC4327237.2s Page A-27 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 37.11123 -82.968131 Site id: 21 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 22 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: KYOG11000110520 OIL_GAS 16133014860000 Kgs recno: H Number : 23 Fns: N Few: E Surf elev: ROXANA County: EQUITABLE PRODUCTION COMPANY, LLC CLEAN GAS, INC 300 Td: 341OHIO Deepst pay: Not Reported Org wclass: GAS Cmpl date: 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Cuttings: BC Plotsymbol: 104085 V 37.093375 -82.954806 37.09347 -82.95469 Site id: KYOG11000117930 136277 79 2412 1402 1383 LETCHER 3956 000 DEV 11-SEP-08 Not Reported 0 GAS KYOG11000117930 OIL_GAS KYOG11000109164 16133009710000 Kgs recno: 127282 H Number : 79 19 Fns: 2823 N Few: 1706 E Surf elev: 1049 ROXANA County: LETCHER KENTUCKY RIVER PROPERTIES LLC CLEAN GAS, INC SB-57 Td: 3608 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 22-DEC-05 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 95957 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/7/R00127282/R00127282.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.108913 -82.939183 TC4327237.2s Page A-28 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 37.109009 -82.939067 Site id: 23 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: OIL_GAS KYOG11000111733 16133011120000 Kgs recno: 129853 H Number : 79 19 Fns: 1259 S Few: 1620 E Surf elev: 1110 ROXANA County: LETCHER HOGG, IRA JR HEIRS CLEAN GAS, INC 151 Td: 3690 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 12-JAN-06 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 98512 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/9/R00129853/R00129853.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.103458 -82.938888 37.103554 -82.938772 Site id: KYOG11000111733 24 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: KYOG11000109164 OIL_GAS 16133012200000 Kgs recno: H Number : 13 Fns: S Few: E Surf elev: ROXANA County: EQUITABLE PRODUCTION COMPANY CLEAN GAS, INC 144 Td: 000 Deepst pay: Not Reported Org wclass: TRM Cmpl date: 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Cuttings: Not Reported Plotsymbol: 100208 V 37.118309 -82.950641 KYOG11000113539 131767 79 598 187 1226 LETCHER 0 000 UNC 30-DEC-99 Not Reported 0 TRM TC4327237.2s Page A-29 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 25 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 26 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.118405 -82.950525 Site id: KYOG11000113539 OIL_GAS KYOG11000107140 16133007270000 Kgs recno: 124695 H Number : 79 22 Fns: 1911 N Few: 1206 W Surf elev: 1552 ROXANA County: LETCHER THE LEWIS COMPANY KINZER, J W 1220 Td: 4150 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 21-MAY-04 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 FDC Plotsymbol: GAS 93982 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/4/R00124695/R00124695.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.094751 -82.945866 37.094846 -82.94575 Site id: KYOG11000107140 OIL_GAS KYOG11000107861 16133007790000 Kgs recno: 125821 H Number : 79 13 Fns: 940 S Few: 1882 E Surf elev: 1437 ROXANA County: LETCHER WEINBERG, JED ET AL CLEAN GAS, INC SB-39 Td: 3936 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 22-MAY-03 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 94597 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/5/R00125821/R00125821.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.119248 -82.956454 TC4327237.2s Page A-30 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 27 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 28 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: 37.119344 -82.956338 Site id: KYOG11000107861 OIL_GAS KYOG11000108810 16133009480000 Kgs recno: 126928 H Number : 79 22 Fns: 230 N Few: 1833 E Surf elev: 1549 ROXANA County: LETCHER HOGG, IRA JR (HEIRS) CLEAN GAS, INC SB-52 Td: 4151 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO Not Reported Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 13-MAY-04 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 BC Plotsymbol: GAS 95572 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/6/R00126928/R00126928.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.099368 -82.939617 37.099464 -82.939501 Site id: KYOG11000108810 OIL_GAS KYOG11000022472 16133001740000 Kgs recno: 23460 H Number : 79 23 Fns: 1950 N Few: 500 W Surf elev: 1351 ROXANA County: LETCHER WRIGHT, JESSIE KEPCO, INC KL498 Td: 3930 344CORN Deepst pay: 341OHIO 239 MCFGPD Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 06-APR-83 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 14614 FDC Plotsymbol: GAS 53671 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/0/2/3/R00023460/R00023460.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.094644 -82.964952 TC4327237.2s Page A-31 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 29 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Api: Letter: Section: Ns: Ew: Usgs quad: Org farm: Org oper: Org wellno: Tdfm: Iof ip: Org result: Plug date: Core: Elog: Kgs permit: Images: Bore type: Rec lat27: Rec lng27: Rec lat83: Rec lng83: 37.094739 -82.964836 Site id: KYOG11000022472 OIL_GAS KYOG11000107143 16133007300000 Kgs recno: 124698 H Number : 79 22 Fns: 1295 N Few: 2308 E Surf elev: 1474 ROXANA County: LETCHER THE LEWIS COMPANY KINZER, J W 1219 Td: 4097 341OHIO Deepst pay: 341OHIO 420 MCFGPD Org wclass: DEV GAS Cmpl date: 25-MAY-04 30-DEC-99 Plug afdvt: Not Reported Not Reported Cuttings: 0 DIL Plotsymbol: GAS 93981 http://kgs.uky.edu/oilgasimages/0/0/1/2/4/R00124698/R00124698.djvu?djvuopts&thumbnails=yes&menu=yes& zoom=page V 37.096443 -82.941245 37.096538 -82.941129 Site id: KYOG11000107143 TC4327237.2s Page A-32 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION Federal EPA Radon Zone for LETCHER County: 2 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for LETCHER COUNTY, KY Number of sites tested: 2 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L Living Area - 1st Floor Living Area - 2nd Floor Basement 0.900 pCi/L Not Reported 2.400 pCi/L 100% Not Reported 100% 0% Not Reported 0% 0% Not Reported 0% TC4327237.2s Page A-33 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Polygon Features Source: Environmental Protection & Public Protection Cabinet Telephone: 502-564-5174 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW R Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4327237.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Kentucky Water Well Records Database Source: Kentucky Geological Survey Telephone: 859-257-5500 Water Wells in Kentucky. Data from the Kentucky Ground Water Data Repository. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Kentucky Geological Survey Telephone: 859-257-5500 Oil and gas well locations in the state of Kentucky RADON State Database: KY Radon Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 502-564-4856 Radon Test Results Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey TC4327237.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4327237.2s Page PSGR-3 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix D: Topographic Maps Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Roxana 8218 Kentucky 160 Hallie, KY 41821 Inquiry Number: 4327237.4 June 16, 2015 EDR Historical Topographic Map Report EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Historical Topographic Map → N TARGET QUAD NAME: WHITESBURG MAP YEAR: 1915 SERIES: SCALE: 15 1:62500 SITE NAME: Roxana ADDRESS: 8218 Kentucky 160 Hallie, KY 41821 LAT/LONG: 37.106 / -82.9544 CLIENT: Cardno TEC CONTACT: Erika Fuery INQUIRY#: 4327237.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/16/2015 Historical Topographic Map → N TARGET QUAD NAME: ROXANA MAP YEAR: 1954 SERIES: SCALE: 7.5 1:24000 SITE NAME: Roxana ADDRESS: 8218 Kentucky 160 Hallie, KY 41821 LAT/LONG: 37.106 / -82.9544 CLIENT: Cardno TEC CONTACT: Erika Fuery INQUIRY#: 4327237.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/16/2015 Historical Topographic Map → N TARGET QUAD NAME: ROXANA MAP YEAR: 1976 PHOTOINSPECTED FROM : 1954 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 SITE NAME: Roxana ADDRESS: 8218 Kentucky 160 Hallie, KY 41821 LAT/LONG: 37.106 / -82.9544 CLIENT: Cardno TEC CONTACT: Erika Fuery INQUIRY#: 4327237.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/16/2015 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix E: Aerial Photographs Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Roxana 8218 Kentucky 160 Hallie, KY 41821 Inquiry Number: 4327237.12 June 17, 2015 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: Aerial PhotographyJune 17, 2015 Target Property: 8218 Kentucky 160 Hallie, KY 41821 Year Scale Details Source 1952 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Date: April 17, 1952 EDR 1952 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Date: April 17, 1952 EDR 1983 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Flight Date: April 26, 1983 EDR 1988 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: March 27, 1988 EDR 1988 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: March 27, 1988 EDR 1991 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Flight Date: March 28, 1991 EDR 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: March 24, 1995 USGS/DOQQ 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: March 24, 1995 USGS/DOQQ 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: March 24, 1995 USGS/DOQQ 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: March 24, 1995 USGS/DOQQ 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: March 24, 1995 USGS/DOQQ 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 4327237.12 2 Year Scale Details Source 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 4327237.12 3 INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1952 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1952 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1983 = 1000' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1988 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1988 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1991 = 750' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1995 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1995 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1995 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1995 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 1995 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2008 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2010 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2012 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2012 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2012 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2012 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4327237.12 2012 = 500' Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix F: City Directories Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Roxana 8218 Kentucky 160 Hallie, KY 41821 Inquiry Number: 4327237.5 June 16, 2015 The EDR-City Directory Image Report Environmental Data Resources Inc 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year 2013 2008 2003 1999 1995 1992 Target Street þ þ þ þ þ ¨ Cross Street ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ Source Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Cole Information Services RECORD SOURCES EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. 4327237- 5 Page 1 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET 8218 Kentucky 160 Hallie, KY 41821 Year CD Image Source 2013 pg A2 Cole Information Services 2008 pg A5 Cole Information Services 2003 pg A7 Cole Information Services 1999 pg A9 Cole Information Services 1995 pg A11 Cole Information Services 1992 - Cole Information Services HIGHWAY 160 Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 4327237- 5 Page 2 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS No Cross Streets Identified 4327237- 5 Page 3 City Directory Images Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 1 3511 3967 3990 5612 5959 6267 6311 6312 6367 6369 6422 6830 6841 7341 7470 7471 7642 7844 7926 7984 7987 8018 8181 8218 8287 8371 8528 8618 8650 8678 8695 8702 8724 8725 8760 8789 8793 8797 8850 8881 8882 8926 8948 8970 8978 9020 9066 Source Cole Information Services 2013 ENTERPRISE COAL CO MARY HALL WALLACE WHITAKER CORINE COLLINS ANGELINA GENTRY MARTHA COLLINS S WHITAKER ANTHONY AMBUREY CARLO CORNETT SHERRY NEICE CHAD COLLIE ROXANA TRANSPORT RONDALL MEADE RONDALL MEADE CATHY WILLIAMS DOUGLAS FIELDS WILLIS FIELDS VERA MITCHELL MICHAEL ISON HALEY DAY JEANIE COMBS RAYMOND COLEMAN GLENN CAUDILL BRANDY HOGG PHILLIP RATLIFF GEORGE ROARK KELLY HOGG LARRY HOGG OCCUPANT UNKNOWN RICKEY DAY BEVERLY SUMNER ROBIN MITCHELL CLARENCE GIBSON CHRIS WHITAKER BORA HALCOMB OCCUPANT UNKNOWN LATASHA WEST LOTTIE ENGLE COY HOGG JONATHAN DINSMORE TOBY MAGGARD KEVIN ISON ROXANA SPECIALIZED HAULERS INC MATTHEW ADAMS WATSON WHITAKER NEVILLE EARLY GEORGE LOGAN KINGS CREEK SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER JERRY STURGILL JIMMY DOTSON 4327237.5 Page: A2 Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 9096 9570 9606 9686 9710 9730 9768 9812 9868 10471 10477 10484 10499 10508 10527 10668 10704 10737 10769 10805 10833 11010 11071 11125 11173 11193 11207 11231 11342 11588 11638 11653 11663 11746 11768 11782 11814 11868 11890 11951 11975 12023 12060 12063 12097 12121 12157 12163 12219 Source Cole Information Services 2013 (Cont'd) DEAN ROARK JACK STURGILL KIMBERLY JOHNSON KENDALL BOGGS KELLY YOUNCE HARRISON BOGGS HARRISON BOGGS HUGH CAUDILL ERIC BOGGS JUNIOR STAMPER HERBERT STAMPER DON WALKER NEVIL EARLY FREDDIE SMITH JOHN BATES ONEIL DAY ERIC BROWN RANDELL FIELDS SANDY HOGG LARRY ROARK EDITH FIELDS BILL MEADE PATS PAWN THOMAS ROARK DON HAMPTON BILLY HUFF ASHLEY INGRAM OCCUPANT UNKNOWN MARK STURGILL TIMOTHY WHITAKER JOSEPH INGRAM DANNY INGRAM RICHARD SHEPHERD OCCUPANT UNKNOWN HOUSTON MEADE OCCUPANT UNKNOWN RUTH FRAZIER OCCUPANT UNKNOWN BETTY LEWIS EARL INGRAM HENRY HERON STANLEY FIELDS KINGSCREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH THOMAS ROARK OCCUPANT UNKNOWN SANDRA ISON SANDRA ISON KELLY NEACE THOMAS COLLINS AUDIE FIELDS 4327237.5 Page: A3 Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 12225 12435 12515 12586 12624 12659 12786 12816 12843 Source Cole Information Services 2013 (Cont'd) ISAAC FIELDS CLYDE BLAIR ALMANDER BLAIR GLEN COOPER GLENDORA CORNETT BRIAN CHAPMAN LUTHER MEAD MEADE & SHEPHERD COAL CO INC LUTHER MEADE 4327237.5 Page: A4 Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 3850 3990 6267 6311 6364 6369 6830 6841 7341 7444 7470 7471 7844 7926 7984 8000 8018 8181 8198 8218 8287 8528 8562 8618 8650 8678 8695 8702 8724 8755 8760 8789 8793 8797 8847 8850 8881 8882 8948 8970 8978 9020 9066 9096 9570 9710 Source Cole Information Services 2008 T BOWLING CORINE COLLINS S WHITAKER ANTHONY AMBUREY SHERRY NEICE CHAD COLLIE RONDALL MEADE RON MEADE CATHY WILLIAMS DOUG FIELDS DOUGLAS FIELDS WILLIS FIELDS MICHAEL ISON MICHELLE ADAMS JEANIE COMBS SHAWN COMBS CHARLES JOSEPH BRANDY HOGG T MCCOY CHRISTOPHER HOCKENBERRY STEVEN RATLIFF GEORGE ROARK LARRY HOGG LDTM INC TIRRELLA BENTLEY RICKEY DAY PANNY STALLARD BEVERLY SUMNER CORAMAE HALCOMB DARRELL ALLEN CLARENCE GIBSON LARRY NAPIER FAWN BRUNER JERRY DINSMORE CORA HALCOMB LOTTIE ENGLE COY HOGG JONATHAN DINSMORE P SMITH JESSICA MAGGARD KEVIN ISON HIRAM WHITAKER NEVILLE EARLY GEORGE LOGAN KINGS CREEK SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER JERRY STURGILL JIMMY DOTSON ALFORD ROARK VERTIE STURGILL PRISCILLA YOUNCE 4327237.5 Page: A5 Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 9730 9768 9812 9868 10056 10477 10484 10499 10508 10527 10668 10704 10737 10805 10850 10931 10941 11010 11071 11125 11173 11207 11231 11232 11588 11638 11782 11814 11868 11951 12060 12121 12157 12163 12219 12435 12475 12515 12586 12624 12659 12816 12843 Source Cole Information Services 2008 (Cont'd) HARRISON BOGGS HARRISON BOGGS HUGH CAUDILL ERIC BOGGS CHARLES DAY JUNIOR STAMPER DON WALKER NEVIL EARLY FREDDIE SMITH OWEN DAY ONEIL DAY ERIC BROWN RANDELL FIELDS PAMELA ROARK VERNETTA ROARK PATRICK MEADE DAYS ENGINE SERVICE BILL MEADE KINGSCREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT THOMAS ROARK LORENE HAMPTON BARBARA HUFF NORMA ROARK MARK STURGILL CONNIE STURGILL JOSEPH INGRAM DANNY INGRAM RUTH FRAZIER LUCKY SEXTON CAROLYN LEWIS HENRY HERON THOMAS ROARK ANDREA CORNETT KELLY NEACE THOMAS COLLINS SHAWN LIND CLYDE BLAIR MIKE HOBSON LARRY DAMRELL GLEN COOPER GLENDORA CORNETT BRIAN CHAPMAN MEADE & SHEPHERD COAL CO INC DONALD WALKER 4327237.5 Page: A6 Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 1601 2657 2808 3450 3961 5516 6830 6841 7470 7471 7727 7984 8000 8181 8198 8218 8447 8528 8618 8650 8702 8789 8793 8847 8850 8881 8882 8938 8948 8970 8978 9020 9096 9201 9570 9710 9730 9768 10056 10334 10471 10477 10484 10499 10508 10527 10805 10837 10850 Source Cole Information Services 2003 CHRIS TOLLIVER CHARLES HOWARD RAYMOND SMITH J BANKS JIMMY PIGMAN JEFF MULLINS MEADE RONDALL RONDALL MEADE RON MEADE JANICE FIELDS WILLIS FIELDS LUCKY SEXTON J COMBS GLENN CAUDILL T MCCOY STEVEN RATLIFF RONNIE ASHBY MARGIE HOGG LAKIE HOGG RICKEY DAY PANNY STALLARD LARRY NAPIER DIANE HOGG COY HOGG KEVIN ISON JESSICA MAGGARD KEVIN ISON HIRAM WHITAKER GEORGE LOGAN JAMES BRADLEY GEORGE LOGAN KINGS CREEK SENIOR CTZN CTR PEGGY STURGILL ALFORD ROARK GLENNA FIELDS VERTIE STURGILL PRISCILLA BOGGS KENDALL BOGGS HARRISON BOGGS APRIL MARTIN JOHN MADDEN MARGARET STAMPER JUNIOR STAMPER DON WALKER JOSEPH CHILDERS SHELIA WALKER OWEN DAY PAMELA ROARK DONALD FIELDS TOMMY ROARK 4327237.5 Page: A7 Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 10861 10941 11010 11125 11193 11207 11231 11342 11588 11638 11782 11814 11868 11890 11951 12121 12157 12224 12435 12475 12515 12586 12624 12659 12816 12843 13420 Source Cole Information Services 2003 (Cont'd) HIRIAM HOGG ONEIL DAY BILL MEADE MEADE & SON TRUCKING PATS PAWN LORENE HAMPTON FRANKLIN ROARK NORMA ROARK LARRY CAUDILL THELMA INGRAM JOSEPH INGRAM DANNY INGRAM RUTH FRAZIER ANGIE SEXTON CAROLYN LEWIS HIRAM INGRAM HENRY HERRAN ANDREA CORNETT JERRY FIELDS ESTELENE SHEPHERD CLYDE BLAIR MIKE HOBSON LARRY DAMRELL GLEN COOPER TIFFINEY BENTLEY RODNEY MEADE MEADE & SHEPHERD COAL CO COUNTRY STYLE INC JOSEPH SMITH 4327237.5 Page: A8 Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 630 672 680 1564 1601 3480 3752 4014 6827 7444 7470 7471 7844 7984 8018 8182 8218 8371 8447 8473 8528 8618 8793 8881 8882 8978 9020 9044 9066 9096 9201 9570 9606 10056 10471 10484 10527 10704 10733 10805 10837 10850 10899 10941 11010 11153 11173 11193 Source Cole Information Services 1999 ROGER GILLIAM WILLARD GILLIAM THOMAS BIGGS EUNICE ADAMS CHRIS TOLLIVER JAMES BATES U S GOVERNMENT POSTAL SERVICE PREMIUM BAPTIST CHURCH R & R AUTOMOTIVE & MACHINE RANDY FIELDS ROSA FIELDS WILLIS FIELDS MICHAEL ISON J COMBS LORA STAMPER P MCCOY BOBBY SHELL DON HOGG LIDA HOGG M HOGG LARRY HOGG ERIC MEADE RICKEY DAY COY HOGG KEVIN ISON HIRAM WHITAKER KINGS CREEK SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER JERRY STURGILL STEVE DICKS JIMMY DOTSON ALFORD ROARK MARSHA FIELDS ASHLAND STURGILL A STURGILL APRIL MARTIN CHARLES DAY JUNIOR STAMPER DON WALKER OWEN DAY RUSSELL AKERS ROGER BALL PAMELA ROARK D FIELDS TOMMY ROARK PATS PARTS & PAWN SHOP ONEIL DAY BILL MEADE MILDRED ISON BARBARA ROARK F ROARK 4327237.5 Page: A9 Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 11232 11342 11588 11638 11653 11746 11768 11782 11814 11868 12224 12435 12475 12515 12624 12659 12816 Source Cole Information Services 1999 (Cont'd) DAVID FIELDS THELMA INGRAM JOSEPH INGRAM DANNY INGRAM BERTHA WILLIAMS TERRY MEADE MATT COMBS RUTH FRAZIER ANGIE SEXTON CAROLYN LEWIS ALBERT ELDRIDGE CLYDE BLAIR MIKE HOBSON LARRY DAMRELL SHAWN MEADE RODNEY MEADE MEADE AND SHEPHERD COAL COMPANY INCORPORATED MEADE AND SHEPHERD COAL COMPANY INCORPORATED OFFICE 4327237.5 Page: A10 Target Street Cross Street - HIGHWAY 160 0 Source Cole Information Services 1995 PREMIUM BAPTIST MISSION 4327237.5 Page: A11 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix G: User Questionnaire Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 Appendix H: Qualifications Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase I ESA October 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ERIKA FUERY ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST TEC INC. - MIDDLETOWN, CT EDUCATION 1995/B.A./Field Biology/Environmental Studies/University of Northern Colorado 2004/M.S./Environmental Science/University of New Haven CERTIFICATIONS Professional Certification in Geographical Information Systems, University of New Haven, 2001 OSHA HAZWOPER Certification Niton XRF Certification Trimble GPS Training ISO 14001:2004 E.M.S. Lead Auditor YEARS EXPERIENCE: 10 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Ms. Fuery is an Environmental Scientist who specializes in dredged material management, Phase I/Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, remedial investigations and documentation, and Geographical Information Systems analysis. She has conducted remedial investigations in Massachusetts, Delaware, Virginia and Connecticut and provided management alternatives analyses for contaminated material for projects in Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida, New York and Connecticut. She has worked closely with state and Federal agencies and has successfully assisted clients in making management decisions regarding contaminated materials by providing comprehensive cost analyses for available disposal methods that have been approved by the EPA. Ms. Fuery has contributed to numerous NEPA documents and has assisted in preparation of Federal and state environmental permit applications. Completed Detailed Phase I Environmental Site on Several Properties in the Northeast U.S.. The primary objective of the Phase I ESA is to render an opinion as to whether surficial or historical evidence indicates the presence of recognized environmental conditions which would result in a release of hazardous materials into the environment, as defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Practice E1527-00 for Phase I ESAs. The studies included; site reconnaissance; review of the property history; and, review of selected local, state and federal regulatory records. Completed Numerous Phase II Subsurface Investigations to Determine Absence or Presence of Contamination at Sites in Pennsylvania, Connecticut and Massachusetts. Phase II investigations involved the sampling of soil and groundwater in areas deemed likely to have been impacted by hazardous materials based on current and historical land use practices. The results of the Phase II investigations determined whether remediation was necessary at the sites. Contributed to Work Plan Development, Site Assessment, Long Term Monitoring and Remediation of a Contaminated Park in East Hartford, CT. The project was located in a municipal park near a residential neighborhood and a school. The site was formerly a gravel pit that was filled in 1960s and 1970s. As a result of the filling activities, elevated levels of regulated compounds were present in the soil and groundwater at several locations within the property boundaries. The remediation of the site included excavation and disposal of impacted soils, backfilling the excavations with clean material to render the site acceptable for residential activities, and long-term, quarterly groundwater monitoring in accordance with Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection requirements. Dredge Material Management and Environmental Assessment of Pier 3 Replacement, Naval Weapons Station Earle, Colts Neck, NJ - Team analyst, conducted a Dredged Material Disposal Alternatives Analysis as required under NEPA. The analysis involved detailed evaluations of disposal and dewatering options, locations and costs for several thousand cubic yards of contaminated dredged material as well as several thousand cubic yards of creosotetreated timber piles. Data provided in this analysis was also incorporated into the Environmental Assessment for this project. Development of Confined Aquatic Disposal Site and Environmental Assessment for Pier 6 Replacement, Naval Submarine Base, New London, CT - Team analyst, conducted a Dredged Material Disposal Alternatives Analysis as required under NEPA for several thousand cubic yards of contaminated sediment. The analysis involved detailed evaluations of treatment, disposal and dewatering options and well as a siting study and cost analysis. The analysis led to the conclusion that Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD) would provide the most cost-effective dredge material disposal option for the contaminated sediment. The successful CAD development was the first of this type of disposal method executed in the Thames River. Data provided in this analysis was also incorporated into the EA for this project. Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment for Maintenance Dredging of Naval Inactive Ship Reserve Basin Philadelphia, PA - Team Analyst, contributed to the development of a Feasibility Study and an EA for the proposed dredging, treatment, and disposal of approximately 300,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment from the NISMO Reserve Basin. Project challenges included heavy sediment contamination, presence of unexploded ordnance, and lack of available land area for dewatering and treatment of the contaminated sediments. Master Plan for Port of Vlora, Albania - Team Analyst, contributed to the development of a feasibility study for the development of an energy park in Vlora, Albania. The study analyzed the potential to develop a new, dedicated cargo port and adjacent energy park to the north of the city of Vlora. Project challenges included heavy mercury contamination at the proposed New Port site, lack of suitable waste stream controls, poorly maintained infrastructure, and a weak economy. Environmental Assessment for the Transfer of the Melville Marina Property at Naval Station Newport in Newport, RI – Team Analyst. Contributed to the development of an Environmental Assessment for the transfer of a former fueling depot property from the Navy to the state of Rhode Island. The waterfront property was identified as a historic district and had a long history of heavy industrial use. The site is being managed under the base IR program and remedial actions are currently ongoing at the site. Planning for Maintenance Dredging of Hague Basin at United States Merchant Marine Academy, Kings Point, NY - Team Analyst and Health and Safety Officer. Conducted a Dredged Material Disposal Alternatives Analysis as required under NEPA. The analysis involved detailed evaluations of disposal and dewatering options, locations and costs for several thousand cubic yards of contaminated dredged material. Participated in Sampling Plan development and results reporting and oversaw sampling activities to ensure compliance with the Sampling Plan and the Health and Safety Plan. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp Roxana, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared by: February 2016 United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street, NW Washington, DC 20534 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cardno was retained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to provide a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to assess identified recognized environmental conditions (RECs) at a 700-acre property located in eastern Letcher County, 7.5 miles west of Whitesburg, Kentucky. The subject property is south of KY Route 588 and west of KY Route 160 (Figure 1). Cardno conducted this ESA in accordance with American Society for Materials and Testing (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Process E1903-11. This standard defines the framework for employing good and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a parcel of real estate with respect to petroleum products and the range of contaminants regulated under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The ASTM standard is intended to provide practical procedural guidance for the continuation of an assessment conducted in accordance with ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM E1528-14 Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process, or both. However, Cardno makes no claims, warranties, or guarantees as to the accuracy of the information contained within the studies, reports, and data reviews that Cardno did not complete for this assessment. Areas sampled as part of this Phase II ESA were identified in the previously conducted Phase I ESA (July 2015) and include: The compressor station and surrounding soils and open containers of petroleum products The damaged plastic aboveground storage tank (AST) located approximately 1,000 feet east of the compressor station The open drain at the large AST located to the north of the Meade compound Two transformers located near the Meade compound The results of the Phase II ESA indicate that petroleum hydrocarbons are present on the subject property at the compressor station, the damaged AST, and the AST open drain valve at concentrations that exceed regulatory criteria but are not considered to be hazardous or require special handling. Soil contamination was limited to the top 2 feet of soil in most instances. Elevated concentrations of arsenic were also detected across the site, but were determined to be consistent with background conditions for the area. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 2.0 3.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Statement of Objectives ........................................................................................................................5 1.3 Detailed Scope of Services ...................................................................................................................5 1.4 Limitations............................................................................................................................................6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Location and Legal Description ...........................................................................................................7 2.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics .............................................................................................7 2.3 Current Use of the Property ..................................................................................................................7 2.4 Description of Structures, Roads and other Improvements on the Site ................................................7 2.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties...................................................................................................8 2.6 Physical Setting ....................................................................................................................................8 2.6.1 Climate .................................................................................................................................8 2.6.2 Topography ..........................................................................................................................8 2.6.3 Geology ................................................................................................................................8 2.6.4 Soils ......................................................................................................................................9 2.6.5 Surface Water .......................................................................................................................9 2.6.6 Groundwater .........................................................................................................................9 DESCRIPTION OF FIELD SAMPLING ACTIVITIES .................................................................................. 11 3.1 Soil Sample Collection ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Compressor Station ............................................................................................................ 12 3.1.2 Damaged AST .................................................................................................................... 12 3.1.3 AST Open Drain Valve ...................................................................................................... 12 3.1.4 Transformers ...................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Field Screening ................................................................................................................................... 12 3.3 Quality Control/Quality Assurance .................................................................................................... 13 3.4 Sample Results ................................................................................................................................... 13 3.4.1 Compressor Station ............................................................................................................ 13 3.4.1.1 Metals ................................................................................................................. 13 3.4.1.2 BTEX/TPH ......................................................................................................... 15 3.4.1.3 PAHs .................................................................................................................. 16 3.4.1.4 TCLP .................................................................................................................. 18 i Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 3.5 February 2016 Damaged AST .................................................................................................................... 18 3.4.2.1 Metals ................................................................................................................. 18 3.4.2.2 BTEX/TPH ......................................................................................................... 19 3.4.2.3 PAHs .................................................................................................................. 20 3.4.2.4 TCLP .................................................................................................................. 21 AST Open Drain Valve ...................................................................................................... 21 3.4.3.1 Metals ................................................................................................................. 21 3.4.3.2 BTEX/TPH ......................................................................................................... 22 3.4.3.3 PAHs .................................................................................................................. 22 3.4.3.4 TCLP .................................................................................................................. 23 Transformers ...................................................................................................................... 23 Applicable Regulatory Standards ....................................................................................................... 23 4.0 DEVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 25 5.0 DISCUSSION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................................................ 27 5.1 Compressor Station ............................................................................................................................ 27 5.2 Damaged AST .................................................................................................................................... 28 5.3 AST Open Drain Valve ...................................................................................................................... 28 5.4 Transformers ...................................................................................................................................... 28 6.0 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 29 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 31 8.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................. 33 APPENDICES Appendix A Figures Appendix B Field Boring Logs Appendix C Chain of Custody Forms Appendix D Laboratory Data Reports ii Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.4-1. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for Metals ......................................................................... 14 Table 3.4-2. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for BTEX/TPH ................................................................ 15 Table 3.4-3. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for PAHs .......................................................................... 17 Table 3.4-4. Results of Damaged AST Soil Analysis for Metals ................................................................................ 19 Table 3.4-5. Results of Damaged AST Soil Analysis for BTEX/TPH ........................................................................ 20 Table 3.4-6. Results of Damaged AST Soil Analysis for PAHs .................................................................................. 20 Table 3.4-7. Results of AST Open Drain Valve Soil Analysis for Metals .................................................................. 21 Table 3.4-8. Results of AST Open Drain Valve Soil Analysis for BTEX/TPH .......................................................... 22 Table 3.4-9. Results of AST Open Drain Valve Soil Analysis for PAHs .................................................................... 22 Table 3.5-1. Analytical Requirements for Petroleum Tanks/Releases .......................................................................... 24 Table 3.5-2. Cleanup Standards for ASTs, Surface Releases, and Exempt USTs ....................................................... 24 iii Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. iv Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE February 2016 Cardno was retained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to provide a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to assess identified recognized environmental conditions (RECs) at a 700-acre property located in eastern Letcher County, 7.5 miles west of Whitesburg, Kentucky. The subject property is south of KY Route 588 and west of KY Route 160 (Figure 1 in Appendix A). Cardno conducted this ESA in accordance with American Society for Materials and Testing (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Process E1903-11. This standard defines the framework for employing good and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a parcel of real estate with respect to petroleum products and the range of contaminants regulated under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The ASTM standard is intended to provide practical procedural guidance for the continuation of an assessment conducted in accordance with ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM E1528-14 Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process, or both. However, Cardno makes no claims, warranties, or guarantees as to the accuracy of the information contained within the studies, reports, and data reviews that Cardno did not complete for this assessment. Cardno, as a continuation of its Phase I ESA work from July 2015, conducted the Phase II ESA in November 2015. The purpose of the Phase II ESA site investigation (SI) was to collect and analyze soil and groundwater samples to determine the absence or presence of environmental contamination on a parcel of land under consideration for the construction of a federal correctional facility. The results of this investigation were referenced and evaluated according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) issued in April 2012. This document follows the recommended structure for an ESA provided in ASTM E1527-13. 1.2 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Phase II ESA were to delineate the extent of observed releases both horizontally and vertically and to confirm the absence or presence of contamination where releases were suspected or deemed likely in the Phase I ESA. 1.3 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES The SI was limited to the immediate areas within the proposed parcel limits where Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were identified during the Phase I ESA. A systematic sampling approach was employed to provide adequate coverage of the RECs based on the findings of the Phase I ESA conducted by Cardno in July 2015. Boring locations were selected based on the identified and suspected release areas presented in the Phase I ESA. Specifically, the following locations, as identified in the Phase I ESA and depicted in Figures 2 through 6 in Appendix A, were sampled: The compressor station and surrounding soils and open containers of petroleum products The damaged plastic aboveground storage tank (AST) located approximately 1,000 feet east of the compressor station 5 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 The open drain at the large AST located to the north of the Meade compound Two transformers located near the Meade compound Soil samples were collected at surface and subsurface intervals at the compressor station and damaged AST, whereas only surficial samples were collected at the open drain AST and the transformer sites. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings and, thus, no groundwater samples were collected. All collected samples were submitted to a state certified laboratory, Gulf Coast Analytical Laboratory (GCAL), for analysis. 1.4 LIMITATIONS The boring program was limited by the presence of buried underground utilities across the site. The presence of buried utilities, or lack of definitive knowledge of their location, limited boring locations and depths at some locations. 6 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 2.0 February 2016 BACKGROUND INFORMATION This section provides a general description of the site, its features and physical setting, a summary of site history and use and the use of adjacent properties, and a summary of the findings of the Phase I ESA conducted in July 2015. 2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of approximately 700 acres of land encompassing nine parcels with eight separate land owners. The subject property is located in Roxana, Kentucky. The location and boundary of the subject property is illustrated in Figure 1 contained in Appendix A. 2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS The subject property is located approximately 7.5 miles west of Whitesburg, Kentucky. It is south of KY Route 588 and west of KY Route 160. The area was previously surface mined; however, mining activities no longer occur at the subject property. Land use surrounding the subject property is primarily forested, with small single-family residences in the area. There are also several state parks and nature preserves within the area. They include Bad Branch Falls State Nature Preserve, Kingdom Come State Park, and Pine Mountain Wildlife Management Area. There are no zoning ordinances or land use classifications identified for this area (DePriest 2013). 2.3 CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY Land use associated with the subject property includes residential and undeveloped areas. The undeveloped areas are predominantly forested and are primarily used for recreational activities such as hiking, primitive camping, and hunting. Several tree stands were observed. There are also former surface mined areas and a small agricultural area. The subject property contains several structures within a fenced area that provide a venue for family gatherings and celebrations. A radio controlled model airplane strip is also located on the subject property. 2.4 DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURES, ROADS AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SITE Bluegrass Ridge Road traverses the property and connects KY Route 160 and Big Branch-Tolson Creek Road/Southeast Road. Both KY Route 588 and KY Route 160 are Class “A” roadways that can accommodate trucks having a gross vehicle weight of up to 44,000 pounds (Kentucky Transportation Cabinet 2014). A network of unimproved roads provide access to the subject property and to 15 natural gas wells located throughout the subject property. A natural gas compressor station is located along the western portion of the property and a small crude oil well is located near the northern extent of the property. A model airplane landing strip and small pavilion are located near the center of the subject property. A small open shed structure is located to the north of the landing strip. The purpose of this structure is not known, but old windows and doors were observed inside. To the east of the open shed is the Meade family compound. The compound contains several structures including two small concession buildings that contained tables and chairs, a small house that was not 7 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 accessible at the time of inspection, a large open pavilion with a food preparation area and bandstand, and modern and primitive restroom buildings. The modern restroom building was also not accessible at the time of inspection. There is electricity in the compound and two transformers were observed on the property. 2.5 CURRENT USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES Areas to the north of the subject property are largely forested but also support residential and agricultural uses. To the east are residences, a small market, and a railroad. Portions of the railroad were observed to be unmaintained and it is assumed that the railroad is no longer in use. To the south there is some agricultural activity and isolated residences, however, the area is largely forest as are areas to the west. 2.6 PHYSICAL SETTING The following sections describe the environmental setting of the subject property and include information on climate, topography, geology, soils, surface water, and groundwater. 2.6.1 Climate The subject property is located in the Eastern Kentucky Coal Field Region. This region experiences mild spring and autumn weather, but temperatures rise to 90 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) an average of 20 days per year (Arnold 2015). The Kentucky climate is characterized by warm summers, with average high temperatures in the mid-80s, and cool winters, with average low temperatures in the high-30s to mid-40s. Kentucky experiences average annual precipitation ranging from over 40 inches in far northern Kentucky to more than 50 inches in south-central Kentucky. Precipitation tends to be well distributed throughout the year, though the fall is typically a bit drier than other seasons. Weather producing extremes of precipitation can develop quickly or persist for extended periods. Flash floods, usually resulting from intense but short lived thunderstorms or from storms training over an area, occur throughout Kentucky, but are a particular concern in the rugged terrain of eastern Kentucky, which is characterized by steep slopes and narrow valleys. Drought occurs periodically in Kentucky. When it does, it is often accompanied by oppressive heat (Foster no date [n.d.]). 2.6.2 Topography The topography at the subject property has been significantly impacted by mountaintop removal coal mining. According to mining permits issued for the site, mining activity occurred in the late 1960s and continued in varying degrees of intensity until the early 1990s. A plateau resulting from mining has replaced a mountain ridge in the central portion of the subject property. This change has not been accounted for on United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps; however, the highest point and lowest points of the subject property remain unchanged. The highest elevation is located in the southeastern portion of the subject property at an elevation of approximately 1,850 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The lowest elevation on the subject property is approximately 1,035 feet AMSL, located in the northwestern portion, adjacent to the North Fork of the Kentucky River. 2.6.3 Geology Pennsylvanian age sedimentary sandstones, siltstones, and shales of the Breathitt Formation characterize the surface geology of the subject property. The major formations below the Breathitt Formation (in order of occurrence) are the Lee Formation, Pennington Formation, Newman Limestone, Grainger Formation, 8 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 and the Chattanooga Shale. The principal mineral resources in the vicinity of the subject property are bituminous coal (Breathitt Formation) and natural gas (Chattanooga Shale). The natural gas bearing strata is over 3,000 feet below the subject property (Letcher County Planning Commission 2008). The Fire Clay coal seam (approximate elevation 1,460 feet) is the principal seam of economic significance in the vicinity of the subject property. Surface mining in this seam created the relatively flat topography on the subject property. The site is unusual for Letcher County because most mountaintop removal operations in the county are underlain by extensive underground mines (Letcher County Planning Commission 2008). However, at the subject property, the Whitesburg Coal Zone (approximate elevation 1,300 feet) is too thin to be of economic importance. Further, the next significant coal seam down column, the Elkhorn No. 3 (approximate elevation 1,100 feet), is below drainage at the site. The relative thinness of the seam (6 inches to 4 feet thickness) and its location below drainage make coal resources within this seam costly to recover. The lack of existing deep mines in the Elkhorn No. 3 seam in the vicinity of the subject property suggests that this seam is currently uneconomical to mine (Letcher County Planning Commission 2008). 2.6.4 Soils The three most common soils on the subject property are the Cloverlick-Kimper-Highsplint complex (3065 percent slopes), the Kaymine, Fairpoint and Fiveblock soils map unit (2-70 percent slopes), and the Shelocta-Highsplint (30-65 percent slopes). To a lesser degree the following soils underlie the subject property: Allegheny Loam (2-25 percent slopes), Dekalb-Gilpin-Rayne complex (25-65 percent slopes), Fiveblock and Kaymine soils (0-30 percent slopes), Gilpin-Shelocta complex (12-25 percent), Grigsby sandy loam (occasionally flooded), Grigsby-Urban land complex (0-6 percent slopes), Urban landUdorthents complex (0-15 percent slopes), and Urban land-Udorthents-Grigsby complex (0-6 percent slopes) (Natural Resources Conservation Service [NRCS] 2013). The subject property contains a small area of soils designated as farmland of statewide importance (NRCS 2013). The soil is Allegheny Loam and is located in the floodplain of the North Fork of the Kentucky River in the northernmost portion of the subject property. None of the soils associated with the subject property are listed as hydric by NRCS. 2.6.5 Surface Water The subject property is situated on top of a plateau, which is the result of mining a portion of the mountain. As a result of the mining, the hydrology of the subject property has been greatly disturbed. Approximately 3.1 acres (1.3 hectares) of wetlands have been delineated on the subject property. The majority of the wetlands are located within the east and west sides of the south-central portion of the subject property (TEC Inc. 2011; Cardno 2014). There are several small ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial unnamed streams identified and mapped on the subject property. Additionally, an open water wetland (pond) comprising approximately 0.41 acres (0.17 hectares) is located along its eastern boundary, north of Rise Branch. The subject property is not located in a 100-year floodplain (Environmental Data Resources [EDR] 2015). 2.6.6 Groundwater There are no groundwater wells on the subject property, but there is a single domestic household well located north of the subject property at an elevation of 1,200 feet with a depth to water of 80 feet. 9 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Groundwater flow tends to follow the slope topography and is assumed to flow towards the north, east, and west of the subject property toward North Fork Kentucky River, Kings Creek, and Tolson Branch, respectively. Variations in groundwater conditions are expected based on location and elevation across the subject property, seasonal conditions, and weather patterns. The subject property is underlain by the Breathitt Group, which is comprised of the Pikeville Formation and the Hyden Formation, and the Four Corners Formation. The Breathitt Group yields more than 500 gallons per day in more than three-quarters of the wells drilled in valley bottoms, more than 500 gallons per day in about three-quarters of the wells on hillsides, and more than 100 gallons per day to nearly all wells on ridges within Letcher County (Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky 2015). There are no sole source aquifers underlying the subject property (USEPA 2013). The quality of the groundwater in Letcher County ranges from moderately hard in most of the county to moderately soft south of Pine Mountain. Naturally occurring contaminants present in the groundwater consist of sulfate, salt (sodium chloride), iron, and manganese (Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky 2015). Groundwater sample data compiled by the Kentucky Division of Mine Permits indicate that groundwater pH is at or near neutral (i.e., 7) and ranges between 6.4 and 8 with sulfate concentrations ranging between 24 and 340 (no units given) (Kentucky Division of Mine Permits 2015). Sulfate does not have a health-based drinking water standard, however, the USEPA has established a nonenforceable secondary standard of 250 mg/L (parts per million). According to the Kentucky Division of Water, Groundwater Branch, Letcher County has areas of moderate and high sensitivity to groundwater pollution. The hydrogeologic sensitivity reflects the ease and speed with which a contaminant can move into and within a groundwater system. The hydrogeologic sensitivity of Letcher County has been assigned a value of three out of five, with five being the most susceptible to groundwater pollution and one being the least susceptible. The region is given a three due to the observation that subcutaneous drains and enlarged fractures influence groundwater recharge, fissure networks influence flow, and bidirectional dispersal patterns influence overall dispersion (Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection [DEP] 1994). 10 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 3.0 February 2016 DESCRIPTION OF FIELD SAMPLING ACTIVITIES Sampling activities were conducted on November 18, 2015. Field conditions were unseasonably warm with overcast skies, temperatures in the low 60s °F, and gusting winds from the south. The licensed drillers for this project were Direct Push Analytical Corporation. Direct Push Analytical Corporation was responsible for the direct push borings during this environmental investigation and for notifying “Call Before You Dig” (i.e., Kentucky 811), and contacting all applicable utility companies with regard to offsite utilities. The Laboratory contractor for this environmental investigation was Gulf Coast Analytical Laboratory (GCAL). The laboratory was responsible for providing glassware, chain of custody documentation, and shipping coolers, and for the chemical analysis of the samples. Cardno personnel were responsible for logging the borings, collecting the samples, and shipping the samples to the analytical laboratory. All borings were logged in the field and screened with a photoionization detector by Kenneth Swain, professional geologist. Erika Fuery provided project oversight and assisted with sample collection. While at the compressor station, employees from Vineland Energy visited the site and were concerned with the proximity of the borings to the compressor station. Shortly after their visit, we were contacted via telephone by a representative of Vineland Energy who explained that they did not realize how close the borings were to the compressor station and that the site was not suitably marked out. Cardno was asked to halt boring activity until Vineland could get a utility locating team out to the site to provide more accurate utility mark outs near then compressor station. The utility locating team arrived approximately 2 hours afterwards and marked out the areas adjacent to the compressor station. The mark out team advised us that because Vineland did not install the compressor station, but rather had purchased it “as is,” they could not guarantee that all buried utilities had been located. Cardno was advised to not advance borings using the Geoprobe™ in excess of 2 feet below ground surface (bgs) on the eastern side of the compressor station where most of the lines were buried. As a result, a hand auger was used to collect samples beyond -2 feet bgs from boring CS-5. Because no evidence of contamination was observed beyond -2 feet bgs, deeper samples were not collected from borings CS-2, CS-3, or CS-4. Boring CS-10 was advanced to 4 feet bgs, but had very poor recovery. Due to the lack of recovered material, only enough volume was available to collect one sample. No evidence of contamination was observed in the recovered material at CS-10. 3.1 SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION Soil sample collection occurred at each of the RECs identified during the Phase I ESA (Appendix A). Soils samples were advanced to -4 feet bgs using Geoprobe™ direct push technology. Where buried utilities were suspected, the 2-4 foot bgs interval was sampled using a hand auger. If no contamination was evident in the 0-2 foot sample interval and buried utilities were suspected, the 2-4 foot bgs interval was not sampled. A copy of the boring logs is contained in Appendix B. Soil boring samples were collected using dedicated acetate liners and were field-screened for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a photoionization detector (PID). The boring interval that received the highest PID reading during the field screening process was selected for laboratory analysis for VOCs. Where no indication of contamination was present, the Cardno professional geologist selected the sample 11 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 interval for laboratory analysis. Once collected, each sample was designated with a specific sample identification (ID) and placed in laboratory supplied glassware. Soil samples collected for TPH-GRO and BTEX analysis were collected using Terracore samplers with the soil preserved in the field using methanol and sodium bicarbonate (USEPA Method 5035A). Collected samples were then placed in iced coolers. Cooler temperatures were monitored to ensure sample integrity was maintained. All soil samples were shipped overnight to the certified laboratory for analysis for the identified Contaminants of Concern associated with each area. 3.1.1 Compressor Station Eleven soil borings were advanced at the compressor station as depicted in Figure 3 (Appendix A). Borings were advanced using direct push drilling technology (i.e., Geoprobe™). Sample CS-5 used direct push methods to collect soil from the ground surface to 0-2 feet bgs. The interval between 3 feet and 4 feet bgs was collected using a hand auger due to the proximity of the boring location to the compressor station and the uncertainly of the location of buried utilities at that location. No evidence of contamination was observed at sample depths greater than 4 feet in any of the borings; therefore, deeper samples were not collected. Due to the suspected presence of buried utilities and the lack of evidence of contamination, no samples were collected in the 2-4 ft interval for samples CS-2, CS3, and CS-4. Boring CS-10 was advanced to 4 feet bgs, but had very poor recovery. Due to the lack of recovered material, only enough volume was available to collect one sample. No evidence of contamination was observed in the recovered material at CS-10. 3.1.2 Damaged AST Upon inspection, the liner within the bermed area around the damaged AST was observed to have deteriorated and was no longer presenting an effective barrier from contamination. Several holes and tears were observed in the liner material and surficial soil staining was observed beneath the liner. The bermed area was not accessible to the truck mounted Geoprobe™ apparatus. Therefore, three borings were advanced within this area using a hand auger (Figure 4 in Appendix A). Boring depths ranged between 1.1 and 1.75 feet before refusal. 3.1.3 AST Open Drain Valve One surficial soil sample was obtained at the draining valve outfall opening for the steel AST located by the oil derrick (Figure 5 in Appendix A). No surficial staining or discoloration was observed at the outfall. The sample was collected using a dedicated stainless steel spoon. 3.1.4 Transformers One surficial (0.0 to 0.5 ft bgs) soil sample was obtained from the area directly beneath each of the pole mounted transformers (Figure 6 in Appendix A). No surficial staining or discoloration was observed at either transformer location. The samples were collected using dedicated stainless steel spoons. 3.2 FIELD SCREENING All soil borings were field screened using a photoionization detector (PID). The sample interval with the highest PID readings was submitted to the laboratory for analysis. The boring interval that received the highest PID reading during the field screening process was selected for laboratory analysis for VOCs. 12 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Where no indication of contamination was present, the Cardno professional geologist selected the sample interval for laboratory analysis. 3.3 QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE One field blank and trip blank were collected during field operations. The field blank was collected by pouring de-ionized water over sampling equipment and submitting the collected water for laboratory analysis to ensure that decontamination procedures were effective. Two duplicate samples were also collected in the field by dividing the representative sample into two and submitting each for laboratory analysis to ensure sampling and laboratory analysis precision. Trip blanks were supplied by the laboratory and accompanied each cooler full of samples to ensure that no cross-contamination occurred during sample packaging and transport. All field blank and field duplicate samples were analyzed for the same analytes as the soil and groundwater samples. Trip blanks were analyzed only for BTEX All samples collected in the field were stored in iced coolers until delivery to the laboratory to preserve the integrity of the sample chemistry. Chain of Custody forms were filled out and accompanied all samples as a legal record of possession of the sample. The Chain of Custody was initiated in the field and accompanied the sample containers during sample collection, transportation to the lab, analysis, and final disposal of the sample. Copies of the Chain of Custody forms are presented in Appendix C. 3.4 SAMPLE RESULTS Gulf Coast Analytical Laboratory performed all chemical analyses on the collected samples. Copies of the laboratory data reports are contained in Appendix D. Sample results were compared to the USEPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs), used in accordance with Title 401 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations, Chapter 100, Section 30 (401 KAR 100:030), Remediation Requirements, and with standards established by the Commonwealth of Kentucky to determine the absence/presence of contaminants of concern. 3.4.1 3.4.1.1 Compressor Station Metals Silver and selenium were not detected in any of the soil samples collected at the compressor station. Table 3.4-1 provides a summary of the results of the soil metals analysis. All of the detected metals were below the USEPA RSLs for all constituents except arsenic. 13 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Table 3.4-1. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for Metals CS1(A) CS1(B) CS1(D) CS1(D) CS2(A) CS3(A) CS4(A) CS5(A) CS5(B) CS6(A) 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-2 ft 0-2 ft 0.5-2 ft 0-1.5 ft 2.5-3 ft 0-1.5 ft Analyte Arsenic 1,890 2,100 1,970 1,800 3,090 3,100 2,720 2,430 1,790 2,930 680 Barium 46,200 123,000 58,900 70,900 94,400 104,000 118,000 180,000 74,900 56,600 15,000,000 Cadmium 252J 119J 167J 112U 117U 113U 117U 122U 140J 109U 71,000 Chromium 13,300 17,700 16,200 16,400 17,000 17,900 16,800 14,700 14,800 15,500 NE Lead 7,570 15,100 14,100 15,200 14,700 14,700 16,800 12,900 10,700 12,600 400,000 0.016 0.014 0.0068J 0.0072J 0.02 0.0091J 0.0053U 0.019 0.014 0.0073J 11,000 Mercury ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg USEPA RSLs ug/kg ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation NE=Not established Bold and Italicized results indicate exceedance of regulatory criteria Table 3.4-1. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for Metals (continued) CS6(B) CS7(A) CS7(B) CS8(A) CS8(B) CS9(A) CS9(B) CS10(A) CS11(A) CS11(B) 2.5-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft Analyte Arsenic ug/kg 3,190 ug/kg 4,730 ug/kg 7,200 ug/kg 7,790 ug/kg 3,570 ug/kg 4,780 ug/kg 2,210 ug/kg 1,960 ug/kg 2,940 ug/kg 2,440 ug/kg 680 Barium 123,000 43,100 94,600 164,000 77,000 131,000 129,000 99,700 88,900 62,600 15,000,000 Cadmium 113U 350J 141J 121J 149J 126J 144J 148J 113J 121J 71,000 Chromium 14,700 10,200 19,800 15,600 20,900 18,100 16,500 16,800 16,500 18,100 NE Lead 13,500 7,770 17,800 13,200 19,800 15,800 13,900 14,800 17,100 16,600 400,000 0.018 0.013 0.017 0.03 0.011J 0.016 0.013J 0.016 0.016 0.022 11,000 Mercury USEPA RSLs ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation NE=Not established Bold and Italicized results indicate exceedance of regulatory criteria The results of the metals analysis indicates arsenic concentrations were well above the USEPA RSLs in all collected soil samples. With regards to inorganic compounds (i.e., metals), the Commonwealth of Kentucky provides guidance for establishing background concentrations in the Kentucky Guidance for Ambient Background Assessment (January 8, 2004) found in Appendix B of the Instruction Booklet for form DEP 7097C, revised September 2011. According to the Kentucky Guidance, surface and subsurface site data should be compared to the statewide numbers in Table 2 of the Kentucky Guidance document and the following three criteria should be used to demonstrate that the site data is background: 1. The mean site concentration for inorganic constituents must be below the 95% Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) of the mean concentrations of background for inorganic constituents 2. At least half of the data points should be less than the 60th percentile 3. No data points should be above the upper bound value (95th percentile) 14 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 For arsenic, Table 2 of the Kentucky Guidance document lists the mean generic statewide ambient background concentration as 8,900 ug/kg, the 95% UCL of mean as 9,400 ug/kg, the 60th percentile as 8,300 ug/kg, and the 95th percentile as 21,200 ug/kg. Because all of the detected arsenic values fall below the mean ambient background concentration, 95% UCL of mean, the 60th percentile, and the 95th percentile, arsenic concentrations can be attributed to background conditions and, as such, arsenic is not a contaminant of concern. 3.4.1.2 BTEX/TPH Table 3.4-2 provides a summary of the results of the soil analysis for Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes (BTEX) and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). All of the detected concentrations of BTEX compounds were below the USEPA RSLs in all samples. TPH concentrations exceeded Kentucky petroleum standards for gasoline range organics (GRO) in sample CS-7(A), as set forth in 401 KAR 100:030 for petroleum releases not regulated under the underground storage tank program. TPH-diesel range organics (DRO) exceeded Kentucky petroleum standards in samples CS-5(A), CS-7(A), CS-10(A), and CS-11(A), as set forth in 401 KAR 100:030 for petroleum releases not regulated under the underground storage tank program. TPH-oil range organics (ORO) exceeded Kentucky petroleum standards in samples in CS-5(A), CS-5(B), CS-7(A), CS-8(A), CS-10(A), and CS-11(A), as set forth in 401 KAR 100:030 for petroleum releases not regulated under the underground storage tank program. Table 3.4-2. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for BTEX/TPH CS1(A) CS1(B) CS1(D) CS1(D) CS2(A) CS3(A) CS4(A) CS-5(A) CS5(B) CS6(A) 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-2 ft 0-2 ft 0.5-2 ft 0-1.5 ft 2.5-3 ft 0-1.5 ft Analyte Benzene ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 0.559J 0.234U 0.204U 0.212U 0.427J 0.226U 0.187U 90.4J 1.20J 0.218U 1,200 Toluene 0.248U 0.234U 0.204U 0.212U 0.210U 0.226U 0.187U 116J 1.04J 0.218U 4,900,000 Ethylbenzene 0.698J 0.234U 0.234J 0.212U 0.210U 0.226U 0.187U 557 1.13J 0.218U 5,800 Xylenes 0.495U 0.468U 0.407U 0.425U 0.420U 0.451U 0.373U 1,180 12.3J 0.435U 580,000 TPH-GRO 2,420J 539U 1,100J 560U 511U 5040 1,440J 19,500 6,470 566U 100,000* TPH-DRO 6,920 2,970J 25,800 1,460U 1,900J 27,300 1,590J 491,000 29,500 1,440U 100,000* THP-ORO 42,200 2,470J 54,600 2,340J 14,500 41,600 11,900 1,640,000 273,000 2,940J 100,000* * As per KY DEP 7079C (9/2011) ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation Bold and Italicized results indicate exceedance of regulatory criteria 15 ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg USEPA RSLs ug/kg Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Table 3.4-2. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for BTEX/TPH (continued) CS6(B) CS-7(A) CS7(B) CS8(A) CS8(B) CS9(A) CS9(B) CS10(A) CS11(A) CS11(B) 2.5-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg USEPA RSLs Analyte Benzene ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 0.203U 212J 2.05J 506 0.485J 0.263J 0.504J 34.4J 1.91J 0.240U 1,200 ug/kg Toluene 0.203U 281 1.24J 847 0.385J 0.182U 0.240U 162J 0.217U 0.240U 4,900,000 Ethylbenzene 0.203U 965 3.93J 4,370 0.913J 0.182U 0.240U 688 3.72J 0.240U 5,800 Xylenes 0.407U 3,510 3.29J 6,040 0.578J 0.365U 0.481U 1,450 3.07J 0.481U 580,000 TPH-GRO 470U 331,000 7,790 51,100 6,470 5,260 917J 3,940J 6,210 474U 100,000* TPH-DRO 1500U 1,070,000 22,400 34,400 24,200 14,600 2,160J 123,000 128,000 5,390 100,000* THP-ORO 8,060 12,500,000 3,2000 148,000 19,600 27,800 2,430J 423,000 336,000 3,850J 100,000* * As per KY DEP 7079C (9/2011) ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation Bold and Italicized results indicate exceedance of regulatory criteria 3.4.1.3 PAHs Table 3.4-3 provides a summary of the results of the soil analysis for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). All of the detected concentrations of PAHs were below the USEPA RSLs in all samples. 16 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Table 3.4-3. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for PAHs CS1(A) CS1(B) CS1(D) CS1(D) CS2(A) CS3(A) 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-2 ft 0-2 ft CS4(A) 0.5-2 ft CS5(A) 0-1.5 ft CS5(B) 2.5-3 ft CS6(A) 0-1.5 ft USEPA RSLs Analyte 1-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 34.5J 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 12.2J 59.2J 5.83U 97.3J 11.3J 5.54U 18,000 ug/kg 2-Methylnaphthalene 27.0J 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 9.08J 36.2J 5.83U 83.3J 11.5J 5.54U 240,000 Acenaphthene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 27.9J 5.83U 6.10U 5.51U 5.54U 3,600,000 Acenaphthylene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 5.60U 5.83U 6.10U 5.51U 5.54U 3,400,000* Anthracene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 5.60U 5.83U 6.10U 14.6J 5.54U 18,000,000 Benzo(a)anthracene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 13.4J 5.83U 10.8J 5.51U 5.54U 160 Benzo(a)pyrene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 5.60U 5.83U 6.10U 5.51U 5.54U 16 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 8.74J 5.83U 21.3J 5.51U 5.54U 160 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 5.60U 5.83U 6.10U 5.51U 5.54U 1,700,000* Benzo(k)fluoranthene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 5.60U 5.83U 6.10U 5.51U 5.54U 1,600 Chrysene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 5.60U 5.83U 25.7J 5.51U 5.54U 16,000 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 5.60U 5.83U 6.10U 5.51U 5.54U 16 Fluoranthene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 11.0J 5.83U 14.5J 5.51U 5.54U 2,400,000 Fluorene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 5.60U 5.83U 6.10U 5.51U 5.54U 2,400,000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 5.60U 5.83U 6.10U 5.51U 5.54U 160 Naphthalene 21.1J 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 12.0J 5.60U 5.83U 49.5J 5.51U 5.54U 3,800 Phenanthrene 30.3J 5.54U 11.4J 5.54U 14.5J 50.4J 5.83U 84.5J 13.7J 5.54U 3,400,000* Pyrene 5.60U 5.54U 5.59U 5.54U 5.87U 7.88J 5.83U 14.5J 5.51U 5.54U 1,800,000 * As per KY DEP 7079C (9/2011) ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation Table 3.4-3. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for PAHs (continued) CS6(B) CS7(A) CS7(B) CS8(A) CS8(B) CS9(A) CS9(B) CS10(A) CS11(A) CS11(B) 2.5-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft ug/kg USEPA RSLs Analyte 1-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 5.73U 238J 319J 258J 314J 103J 16.0J 84.7J 121J 5.55U 18,000 2-Methylnaphthalene 5.73U 170J 395 269J 305J 76.9J 13.5J 69.2J 100J 5.55U 240,000 Acenaphthene 5.73U 54.9U 5.35U 5.75U 5.49U 5.84U 5.45U 5.98U 5.35U 5.55U 3,600,000 Acenaphthylene 5.73U 54.9U 5.35U 5.75U 5.49U 5.84U 5.45U 5.98U 5.35U 5.55U 3,400,000* Anthracene 5.73U 54.9U 5.35U 5.75U 5.49U 5.84U 5.45U 5.98U 5.35U 5.55U 18,000,000 Benzo(a)anthracene 5.73U 54.9U 5.35U 19.4J 5.49U 13.3J 5.45U 5.98U 5.35U 5.55U 160 Benzo(a)pyrene 5.73U 54.9U 12.0J 12.3J 18.7J 5.84U 5.45U 5.98U 8.16J 5.55U 16 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5.73U 54.9U 42.5J 28.1J 7.98J 18.0J 7.82J 10.5J 18.4J 5.55U 160 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5.73U 54.9U 30.8J 18.7J 40.9J 5.84U 7.48J 5.98U 17.6J 5.55U 1,700,000* Benzo(k)fluoranthene 5.73U 54.9U 5.35U 5.75U 5.49U 9.22J 5.45U 5.98U 5.35U 5.55U 1,600 17 ug/kg Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Table 3.4-3. Results of Compressor Station Soil Analysis for PAHs (continued) CS6(B) CS7(A) CS7(B) CS8(A) CS8(B) CS9(A) CS9(B) CS10(A) CS11(A) CS11(B) 2.5-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft 0-4 ft 0-1 ft 3-4 ft USEPA RSLs ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg Analyte Chrysene 5.73U 54.9U 57.0J 46.9J 74.0J 34.1J 5.45U 15.3J 27.5J 5.55U 16,000 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 5.73U 54.9U 5.35U 5.75U 5.49U 5.84U 5.45U 5.98U 5.35U 5.55U 16 Fluoranthene 5.73U 54.9U 58.2J 33.8J 62.3J 15.9J 5.45U 15.4J 24.6J 5.55U 2,400,000 Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3cd)pyrene Naphthalene 5.73U 54.9U 30.7J 13.5J 25.5J 5.84U 5.45U 5.98U 5.35U 5.55U 2,400,000 5.73U 54.9U 11.6J 5.75U 18.6J 5.84U 5.45U 5.98U 5.35U 5.55U 160 5.73U 54.9U 184J 131J 88.1J 30.6J 5.45U 40.1J 54.5J 5.55U 3,800 Phenanthrene 5.73U 54.9U 254J 246J 270J 91.6J 18.5J 67.3J 113J 5.55U 3,400,000* Pyrene 5.73U 54.9U 30.7J 34.8J 36.2J 15.3J 5.45U 9.40J 16.1J 5.55U 1,800,000 * As per KY DEP 7079C (9/2011) ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation 3.4.1.4 TCLP Only barium was detected in the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) analysis for soil samples collected at the compressor station. Barium TCLP concentrations ranged between undetected and 1.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L). The USEPA hazardous waste standard for barium is 100 mg/L. Because all detected concentrations of barium are well below the USEPA standard, the soil at the compressor station would not be considered hazardous and no special handling or disposal measures would be required. 3.4.2 3.4.2.1 Damaged AST Metals Selenium and silver were not detected in any of the samples collected at the damaged AST. Metals concentrations in soils samples collected near the damaged AST did not exceed regulatory action levels for any metals analyzed with the exception of arsenic in samples T-1 and T-2 (Table 3.4-4). 18 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Table 3.4-4. Results of Damaged AST Soil Analysis for Metals T-1(A) T-2(A) T-3(A) 0-1 ft 0-1.5 ft 0-1.5 ft USEPA RSLs Analyte Arsenic ug/kg 2,630 ug/kg 4,140 ug/kg 0.025U ug/kg 680 Barium 63,900 73,400 0.36 15,000,000 Cadmium 114J 114U 0.025U 71,000 Chromium 14,300 16,600 0.025U NE Lead 12,100 13,200 0.025U 400,000 Mercury 0.0056J 0.010J 0.000070U 11,000 ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation Bold and Italicized results indicate exceedance of regulatory criteria Similar to the samples collected at the compressor station, the results of the metals analysis for soil samples collected near the damaged AST indicate arsenic concentrations well above the USEPA RSLs. However, because all of the detected arsenic values fall below the generic statewide ambient mean background concentration, 95% UCL of mean, the 60th percentile, and the 95th percentile as reported in Section 3.4.1.1, arsenic concentrations can be attributed to background conditions and, as such, arsenic is not a contaminant of concern. 3.4.2.2 BTEX/TPH BTEX compounds and TPH-GRO were not detected at concentrations in excess of USEPA RSLs in samples T-1(A) or T-2(A) (Table 3.4-5). Due to an error in the Chain of Custody forms, BTEX and TPHGRO were not analyzed for sample T-3(A) and therefore, the results are not reported. However, based on the results of the TPH-DRO and TPH-ORO analyses, it is not likely that BTEX and TPH-GRO concentrations would have exceeded USEPA RSLs or Kentucky petroleum standards for these compounds in sample T-3(A). TPH-DRO and TPH-ORO concentrations were substantially higher in T1(A) than in T-3(A), but BTEX and TPH-GRO concentrations in sample T-1(A) did not exceed USEPA RSLs or Kentucky petroleum standards for TPH-GRO. Because the source of contamination is the same for both samples it is not likely that BTEX and TPH-GRO concentrations that were observed in T-1(A) would have been higher in T-3(A). 19 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Table 3.4-5. Results of Damaged AST Soil Analysis for BTEX/TPH T-1(A) T-2(A) T-3(A) 0-1 ft 0-1.5 ft 0-1.5 ft USEPA RSLs Analyte Benzene ug/kg 12.2U ug/kg 0.308U ug/kg NR ug/kg 1,200 Toluene 36.2J 0.308U NR 4,900,000 Ethylbenzene 52.2J 0.308U NR 5,800 Xylenes 755 0.617U NR 580,000 TPH-GRO 45,100 10,500 NR 100,000* TPH-DRO 3,020,000 11,800 68,700 100,000* THP-ORO 4,450,000 25,500 116,000 100,000* * As per KY DEP 7079C (9/2011) ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram NR=Not reported U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation Bold and Italicized results indicate exceedance of regulatory criteria Sample T-1(A) exceeded Kentucky petroleum standards for TPH-DRO and TPH-ORO and sample T2(A) exceeded Kentucky petroleum standards for TPH-ORO as set forth in 401 KAR 100:030 for petroleum releases not regulated under the underground storage tank program. 3.4.2.3 PAHs Table 3.4-6 provides a summary of the results of the damaged AST soil analysis for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). All of the detected concentrations of PAHs were below the USEPA RSLs in all samples. Table 3.4-6. Results of Damaged AST Soil Analysis for PAHs T-1(A) T-2(A) T-3(A) 0-1 ft 0-1.5 ft 0-1.5 ft Analyte 1-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg 102J ug/kg 48.2J ug/kg 28.5J ug/kg 18,000 2-Methylnaphthalene 5.66U 35.3J 19.5J 240,000 Acenaphthene 5.66U 5.76U 5.69U 3,600,000 Acenaphthylene 5.66U 5.76U 5.69U 3,400,000* Anthracene 5.66U 5.76U 5.69U 18,000,000 Benzo(a)anthracene 5.66U 5.76U 19.3J 160 Benzo(a)pyrene 5.66U 5.76U 5.69U 16 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5.66U 12.4J 11.0J 160 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5.66U 7.86J 5.69U 1,700,000* Benzo(k)fluoranthene 5.66U 5.76U 5.69U 1,600 Chrysene 5.66U 14.5J 5.69U 16,000 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 5.66U 5.76U 5.69U 16 Fluoranthene 5.66U 10.9J 9.01J 2,400,000 20 USEPA RSLs Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Table 3.4-6. Results of Damaged AST Soil Analysis for PAHs T-1(A) T-2(A) T-3(A) 0-1 ft 0-1.5 ft 0-1.5 ft Fluorene ug/kg 5.66U ug/kg 5.76U ug/kg 5.69U ug/kg 2,400,000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 5.66U 5.76U 5.69U 160 Naphthalene 45.1J 24.1J 5.69U 3,800 Phenanthrene 79.0J 57.8J 36.2J 3,400,000* Pyrene 5.66U 9.34J 5.69U 1,800,000 Analyte USEPA RSLs * As per KY DEP 7079C (9/2011) ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation 3.4.2.4 TCLP Only barium was detected in the TCLP metal analysis for soil samples collected at the damaged AST. Barium TCLP concentrations ranged between 0.32 and 0.42 mg/L. The USEPA hazardous waste standard for barium is 100 mg/L. Because all detected concentrations of barium are well below the USEPA standard, the soil at the damaged AST would not be considered hazardous and no special handling or disposal measures would be required. 3.4.3 3.4.3.1 AST Open Drain Valve Metals Cadmium, selenium, and silver were not detected in any of the samples collected at the AST open drain valve near the oil derrick (Table 3.4-7). Metals concentrations in the soil sample collected near the outfall did not exceed regulatory action levels for any metals analyzed with the exception of arsenic. Consistent with the other samples on the site, arsenic concentrations are attributable to background concentrations in the area. Table 3.4-7. Results of AST Open Drain Valve Soil Analysis for Metals OD-1 Surface USEPA RSLs Analyte Arsenic ug/kg 3,410 680 ug/kg Barium 250,000 15,000,000 Chromium 12,600 NE Lead 17,000 400,000 Mercury 0.017J 11,000 * As per KY DEP 7079C (9/2011) ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation Bold and Italicized results indicate exceedance of regulatory criteria 21 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 3.4.3.2 February 2016 BTEX/TPH BTEX compounds and TPH-GRO were not detected at concentrations in excess of USEPA RSLs in samples T-1(A) or T-2(A) (Table 3.4-8). Sample OD-1 exceeded Kentucky petroleum standards for TPHDRO and TPH-ORO as set forth in 401 KAR 100:030 for petroleum releases not regulated under the underground storage tank program. Table 3.4-8. Results of AST Open Drain Valve Soil Analysis for BTEX/TPH OD-1 Surface USEPA RSLs Analyte Benzene ug/Kg 1.29J ug/kg 1,200 Toluene 1.56J 4,900,000 Ethylbenzene 2.21J 5,800 Xylenes 4.61J 580,000 TPH-GRO 3,430J 100,000* TPH-DRO 114,000 100,000* TPH-ORO 157,000 100,000* * As per KY DEP 7079C (9/2011) ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation 3.4.3.3 PAHs Table 3.4-9 provides a summary of the results of the AST open drain valve soil analysis for PAHs. All of the detected concentrations of PAHs were below the USEPA RSLs. Table 3.4-9. Results of AST Open Drain Valve Soil Analysis for PAHs OD-1 Surface USEPA RSLs Analyte 1-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg 64.0J ug/kg 18,000 2-Methylnaphthalene 54.6J 240,000 Acenaphthene 7.59U 3,600,000 Acenaphthylene 7.59U 3,400,000* Anthracene 7.59U 18,000,000 Benzo(a)anthracene 23.9J 160 Benzo(a)pyrene 7.59U 16 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 7.59U 160 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 7.59U 1,700,000* Benzo(k)fluoranthene 7.59U 1,600 Chrysene 7.59U 16,000 22 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Table 3.4-9. Results of AST Open Drain Valve Soil Analysis for PAHs OD-1 Surface USEPA RSLs Analyte Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/kg 7.59U 16 ug/kg Fluoranthene 7.59U 2,400,000 Fluorene 7.59U 2,400,000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 7.59U 160 Naphthalene 34.9J 3,800 Phenanthrene 51.7J 3,400,000* Pyrene 7.59U 1,800,000 * As per KY DEP 7079C (9/2011) ug/kg=micrograms per kilogram U=Undetected J=Result is between the method detection limit and the limit of quantitation 3.4.3.4 TCLP Only barium was detected in the TCLP analysis for the soil sample collected at the AST open drain valve. The barium TCLP concentration was 0.78 mg/L. The USEPA hazardous waste standard for barium is 100 mg/L. Because the detected concentration of barium is well below the USEPA standard, the soil at the AST open drain valve would not be considered hazardous and no special handling or disposal measures would be required. 3.4.4 Transformers One surficial soil sample was collected beneath each of the pole mounted transformers on the site and analyzed for PCBs. Specifically, aroclors 1016, 1221, 1232, 1242, 1254, and 1260 were tested. No PCB aroclors were detected in either of the transformer samples. 3.5 APPLICABLE REGULATORY STANDARDS On March 18, 2004, Kentucky enacted a new cleanup regulation (401 KAR 100:030), which establishes standards under Kentucky Revised Statutes 224.01-400 and 224.01-405 with respect to hazardous substances, pollutants, contaminants, petroleum, and petroleum products that are protective of human health, safety, and the environment. On June 8, 2011, the Superfund Branch of the Kentucky Division of Waste Management adopted the USEPA RSLs to replace the 2002 Preliminary Remediation Goals. Closure of petroleum releases from ASTs and other sources can be achieved through removal of the contaminants to acceptable levels based on the current update of the USEPA RSLs. Analytical requirements for common petroleum products are listed in Table 3.5-1. Cleanup standards for ASTs, surface releases, and exempt USTs are listed in Table 3.5-2. 23 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 Table 3.5-1. Analytical Requirements for Petroleum Tanks/Releases Petroleum Substance Unleaded Gasoline Leaded Gasoline and Tanks in use prior to 1977 Crude Oil + or Kerosene, or Jet Fuel Analysis Acceptable Method BTEX BTEX and Total Lead * BTEX and PAH Diesel or Heating Fuel PAH Waste Oil PAH and Total Metals ** New Oil or Hydraulic Oil TPH and PAH *** Other Petroleum or Non- Petroleum Substances Contact the Superfund Branch SW-846 8340, 8260, 8020, or 8021 SW-846 8100, 8270, or 8310 SW-846 8100, 8270, or 8310 SW-846 6010 SW-846 8015B (soil) EPA Method 1664A (water) For leaded gasoline or for any tanks that stored gasoline and were in use prior to 1977, total lead must be analyzed in addition to BTEX. SW-846 methods 7420, 7421, or 6010 must be used. + A survey for naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) concentrations for Radium 226 and Radium 228 may be required. ** Total Metals: Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury, Selenium, and Silver. *** For releases of new oil, hydraulic oil, and other petroleum substances, media analyses by extensions of SW-846 lab methods may also be used. The Superfund Branch should be contacted for further information. Table 3.5-2. Cleanup Standards for ASTs, Surface Releases, and Exempt USTs Parameter Soil Groundwater B: 0.005 ppm T: 1.0 ppm E: 0.7 ppm X: 10.0 ppm cPAH: 0.0002 ppm nPAH: Use the RSL tap water numbers Naphthalene: 0.14 ppb BTEX Use Residential RSLs as the initial screening levels PAH Use Residential RSLs as the initial screening levels TPH No carcinogenic PAH constituent present above RSL screening levels; each individual PAH constituent must be below RSL screening levels. Residential TPH - 100 ppm; Industrial TPH – 250 ppm 5.0 ppm Total Lead Use Residential RSLs as the initial screening levels 0.015 ppm Total Metals Use RSLs as the initial screening levels and Table 2, page 19, Generic Statewide Ambient Background for Kentucky found in Kentucky Guidance for Ambient Background Assessment (January 8, 2004) [in Appendix B of the Instruction Booklet for form DEP 7097C, revised September 2011]. MCLs* or RSL tap water numbers for constituents not found on the MCL list. Acenaphthylene Residential - 3,400 ppm; Industrial - 33,000 ppm Tap Water – 2,200 ppb Benzo(ghi)perylene Residential - 1,700 ppm; Industrial - 17,000 ppm Tap Water – 1,100 ppb Phenanthrene Residential - 3,400 ppm; Industrial - 33,000 ppm Tap Water – 2,200 ppb ppm: parts per million (mg/kg) or (mg/L) ppb: parts per billion (μg/kg) or (μg/L) cPAH: Allowable level individually for Benz[a]anthracene, Benzo[a]pyrene, Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene, Dibenz[a,h]anthracene, Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, Naphthalene and Chrysene. nPAH: Allowable level individually for Acenaphthene, Anthracene, Fluoranthene, Fluorene, Pyrene. *MCL=Maximum Contaminant Level - Federal Drinking Water Standards 24 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 4.0 February 2016 DEVIATIONS Deviations from the workplan occurred as a result of ground refusal and as per the request by Vineland Energy to limit the depth of Geoprobe™ advancement in the area east of the compressor station due to the potential presence of buried utilities. Ground refusal was experienced at boring CS-7. As a result, the boring location was relocated 1.5 feet east of the proposed location. Borings CS-2 through CS-5 were advanced to 2 feet bgs using the Geoprobe™. Deeper samples were collected using a hand auger only in instances where visual, olfactory, or PID evidence indicated the possible presence of contamination in deeper soils. A hand auger was used to collect a deeper sample at boring CS-5 to maximum depth of -3 feet bgs. Boring CS-10 was advanced to 4 feet bgs but had very poor recovery. Due to the lack of recovered material, only enough volume was available to collect one sample. No evidence of contamination was observed in the recovered material at CS-10. A fuel AST that was located adjacent to the compressor station during the Phase I ESA had been relocated approximately 30 feet east of its original location. The fuel supply line from the AST to the compressor station had been extended and buried resulting in the need to relocate borings CS-2 and CS-3. 25 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 26 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 5.0 February 2016 DISCUSSION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Arsenic was detected at all locations on the subject property at concentrations well above the USEPA RSL. With regards to inorganic compounds (i.e., metals), the Commonwealth of Kentucky provides guidance for establishing background concentrations in the Kentucky Guidance for Ambient Background Assessment (January 8, 2004) found in Appendix B of the Instruction Booklet for form DEP 7097C, revised September 2011. According to the Kentucky Guidance, surface and subsurface site data should be compared to the statewide numbers in Table 2 of the Guidance document and the following three criteria should be used to demonstrate that the site data is background: 1. The mean site concentration for inorganic constituents must be below the 95% Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) of the mean concentrations of background for inorganic constituents 2. At least half of the data points should be less than the 60th percentile 3. No data points should be above the upper bound value (95th percentile) The mean generic statewide ambient background concentration for arsenic is reported to be 8,900 ug/kg. For arsenic, the 95% UCL of mean is 9,400 ug/kg, the 60th percentile is 8,300 ug/kg, and the 95th percentile is 21,200 ug/kg. Arsenic concentrations in the collected samples ranged between “Not Detected” and 7,790 ug/kg. Because all of the detected arsenic values fall below the mean generic statewide ambient background concentration, the 95% UCL of mean, the 60th percentile, and the 95th percentile, arsenic concentrations can be attributed to background conditions and, as such, arsenic is not a contaminant of concern on the subject property. 5.1 COMPRESSOR STATION The results of the chemical analysis indicate that soils surrounding the compressor station have been adversely impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons. Petroleum releases appear to be the result of leaks from piping and from oily residues found in machinery exhaust. Soil concentrations of petroleum at the compressor station exceeded USEPA RSLs and Kentucky regulatory standards in several samples. Gasoline range organics were detected at concentrations above regulatory criteria in sample CS-7(A). No other exceedances for gasoline range organics were detected in any of the samples collected at the compressor station. Diesel range organics were detected at levels above regulatory criteria in samples CS5(A), CS-7(A), CS-10(A), and CS-11(A). Oil range organics were detected at concentrations above regulatory criteria in samples CS-5(A), CS-5(B), CS-7(A), CS-8(A), CS-10(A), and CS-11(A). CS-5(B) was the only deeper sample where regulatory criteria for oil range organics was exceeded. This sample was collected using a hand auger and exposure to oil saturated surficial soils may have occurred during extraction of the sample. Oil saturated soil was observed to fall into the boring after the extraction of the Geoprobe™ tube. The hand auger was used to drill past the oily back fall and into the soil beneath. No evidence of oil contamination was observed in the collected sample and soil contamination at this location is not believed to exceed 4 feet bgs. No other contaminants of concern were identified at the compressor station and the detected concentrations of all remaining analytical parameters were well within applicable regulatory criteria. 27 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 5.2 February 2016 DAMAGED AST The presence of a spill containment berm around the damaged AST prevented access by the truck mounted geoprobe. As a result, all samples collected in this area were obtained using a hand auger and were collected from within the top 2 feet of soil. The results of the chemical analysis indicate that surficial soils around the damaged AST have been adversely impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons. The petroleum release appears to be the result of rain and petroleum entering the damaged AST and the contents overtopping and spilling out of the open top. The liner beneath the AST has weathered away in numerous places and is no longer functioning as a barrier between the released material and the underlying soil. Soil concentrations of petroleum at the damaged AST exceeded USEPA RSLs and Kentucky regulatory standards at two locations. Gasoline range organics were not detected at concentrations above regulatory criteria in any of the samples. It should be noted that due to a paperwork error, BTEX compounds and TPH-GRO were not analyzed in one sample (T-3[A]). TPH-DRO and TPH-ORO results for this sample were intermediary when compared to the results of samples T-1(A) and T-2(A). Since BTEX compounds and TPH-GRO were not detected at concentrations that exceeded USEPA RSLs in samples T-1(A) and T-2(A), it is unlikely that the concentrations of these compounds would exceed USEPA RSLs in sample T-3(A). Diesel range organics were detected at levels above regulatory criteria in sample T-1(A). Oil range organics were detected at concentrations above regulatory criteria in samples T-1(A) and T-3(A). Evidence of oil contamination was observed to be concentrated in the top foot of soil and soil contamination at this location is not believed to exceed 2 feet bgs. 5.3 AST OPEN DRAIN VALVE The results of the chemical analysis indicate that surficial soils at the AST draining valve outfall opening have been adversely impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons. Diesel range organics and oil range organics were detected at levels above regulatory criteria. Oil contamination was not visually evident at this location and is suspected to be limited to surficial soils (i.e. not greater than 1 foot bgs). 5.4 TRANSFORMERS The results of the chemical analysis indicate that surficial soils beneath the two transformers have not been adversely impacted by PCBs. 28 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 6.0 February 2016 CONCLUSIONS The results of the Phase II ESA indicate that soils on the subject property have been adversely impacted by petroleum at three locations: the compressor station, the damaged AST, and the AST open drain valve. Contaminated soils on the subject property are limited to the top 2 feet of soil in most areas and are not considered hazardous. Therefore, the contaminated soils may be disposed of at a soil recycling facility or a landfill permitted to accept petroleum contaminated soil. 29 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 30 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 7.0 February 2016 RECOMMENDATIONS Closure of the petroleum releases can be achieved through removal of the contaminants to acceptable levels based on the current update of the USEPA RSLs and the procedures outlined for ASTs and surface releases in DEP 7079C – Closure Report for Petroleum Releases and Exempt Petroleum Tank Systems. Upon decommissioning of the petroleum extraction operation, the identified contaminated soils should be excavated and disposed of at a permitted disposal facility (i.e., soil recycling facility or landfill permitted to accept petroleum contaminated soil). The walls and floor of all excavated areas should be sampled to demonstrate compliance with Kentucky cleanup standards for petroleum hydrocarbons in residential areas as per Kentucky DEP 7079C (September 2011), Table B. All reports, analytical results, mapping, chain of custody forms, and waste manifests should be submitted to the Kentucky DEP Division of Waste Management, Superfund Branch-Petroleum Cleanup Section in accordance with the procedures outlined for clean closure of ASTs and surface releases in DEP 7079C. As the owner/operator of the compressor station, Vineland Energy is a responsible party for the documented petroleum releases and, as such, is responsible for the cleanup of the site. Prior to the purchase of the property, it is recommended that Vineland Energy remove the compressor station and all tanks, piping, and appurtenances from the site. Once removed, it is recommended that a licensed contractor remove and dispose of all contaminated soils on the property in accordance with applicable regulations and in coordination with Kentucky DEP Division of Waste Management, Superfund BranchPetroleum Cleanup Section. 31 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 32 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA 8.0 February 2016 REFERENCES Arnold, Elizabeth. 2015. Climate in the Regions of Kentucky. USA Today. http://traveltips.usatoday.com/climate-regions-kentucky-104975.html. Cardno. 2014. Draft Supplemental Jurisdictional Delineation Payne Gap and Roxana Sites. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons. August. DePriest, Joe. 2013. Economic Development Director, Letcher County. Personal communication. Environmental Data Resources (EDR). 2015. The EDR Radius Map™ Report With Geocheck. June 16, 2015. Foster, Stuart. No date. Highlighting Kentucky’s Climate: What You Expect Isn’t Always What You Get. Kentucky’s Climate: The CoCoRaHS ‘State Climates’ Series. http://www.cocorahs.org/Media/docs/ClimateSum_KY.pdf. Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection (KDEP). 1994. Division of Water: Groundwater Branch. Groundwater Sensitivity Regions of Kentucky. http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsweb/download/wrs/sensitivity.pdf. Kentucky Division of Mine Permits. 2015. Kentucky Water Sample Data Viewer. http://gis.gapsky.org/watersample/. Accessed October 8, 2015. Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky. 2015. Kentucky Geologic Map Information Service. http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsmap/kgsgeoserver/viewer.asp. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC). 2014. Functional Classification. Available on-line at: http://transportation.ky.gov/Planning/Pages/Functional-Classification.aspx. Letcher County Planning Commission. 2008. Preliminary Engineering Report. Development Sites Volume I. Roxana Prison Site. Prepared by Summit Engineering, Lexington, Kentucky. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2013. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. TEC, Inc. 2011. Draft Wetland Identification and Delineation Report, Roxana/Meade Farm, Letcher County, Kentucky. Prepared for the Federal Bureau of Prisons. August. USEPA. 2013. Region 4: Ground Water Protection, Sole Source Aquifers in the Southeast http://www.epa.gov/region4/water/groundwater/r4ssa.html. 33 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 34 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 APPENDIX A FIGURES A-1 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. A-2 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 APPENDIX B FIELD BORING LOGS B-1 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. B-2 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 APPENDIX C CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS C-1 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. C-2 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 APPENDIX D LABORATORY DATA REPORTS D-1 Federal Bureau of Prisons Roxana Site Phase II ESA February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. D-2 215112008 Page 1 of 1820 215112008 Page 2 of 1820 215112008 Page 3 of 1820 215112008 Page 4 of 1820 215112008 Page 5 of 1820 215112008 Page 6 of 1820 215112008 Page 7 of 1820 215112008 Page 8 of 1820 215112008 Page 9 of 1820 215112008 Page 10 of 1820 215112008 Page 11 of 1820 215112008 Page 12 of 1820 215112008 Page 13 of 1820 215112008 Page 14 of 1820 215112008 Page 15 of 1820 215112008 Page 16 of 1820 215112008 Page 17 of 1820 215112008 Page 18 of 1820 215112008 Page 19 of 1820 215112008 Page 20 of 1820 215112008 Page 21 of 1820 215112008 Page 22 of 1820 215112008 Page 23 of 1820 215112008 Page 24 of 1820 215112008 Page 25 of 1820 215112008 Page 26 of 1820 215112008 Page 27 of 1820 215112008 Page 28 of 1820 215112008 Page 29 of 1820 215112008 Page 30 of 1820 215112008 Page 31 of 1820 215112008 Page 32 of 1820 215112008 Page 33 of 1820 215112008 Page 34 of 1820 215112008 Page 35 of 1820 215112008 Page 36 of 1820 215112008 Page 37 of 1820 215112008 Page 38 of 1820 215112008 Page 39 of 1820 215112008 Page 40 of 1820 215112008 Page 41 of 1820 215112008 Page 42 of 1820 215112008 Page 43 of 1820 215112008 Page 44 of 1820 215112008 Page 45 of 1820 215112008 Page 46 of 1820 215112008 Page 47 of 1820 215112008 Page 48 of 1820 215112008 Page 49 of 1820 215112008 Page 50 of 1820 215112008 Page 51 of 1820 215112008 Page 52 of 1820 215112008 Page 53 of 1820 215112008 Page 54 of 1820 215112008 Page 55 of 1820 215112008 Page 56 of 1820 215112008 Page 57 of 1820 215112008 Page 58 of 1820 215112008 Page 59 of 1820 215112008 Page 60 of 1820 215112008 Page 61 of 1820 215112008 Page 62 of 1820 215112008 Page 63 of 1820 215112008 Page 64 of 1820 215112008 Page 65 of 1820 215112008 Page 66 of 1820 215112008 Page 67 of 1820 215112008 Page 68 of 1820 215112008 Page 69 of 1820 215112008 Page 70 of 1820 215112008 Page 71 of 1820 215112008 Page 72 of 1820 215112008 Page 73 of 1820 215112008 Page 74 of 1820 215112008 Page 75 of 1820 215112008 Page 76 of 1820 215112008 Page 77 of 1820 215112008 Page 78 of 1820 215112008 Page 79 of 1820 215112008 Page 80 of 1820 215112008 Page 81 of 1820 215112008 Page 82 of 1820 215112008 Page 83 of 1820 215112008 Page 84 of 1820 215112008 Page 85 of 1820 215112008 Page 86 of 1820 215112008 Page 87 of 1820 215112008 Page 88 of 1820 215112008 Page 89 of 1820 215112008 Page 90 of 1820 215112008 Page 91 of 1820 215112008 Page 92 of 1820 215112008 Page 93 of 1820 215112008 Page 94 of 1820 215112008 Page 95 of 1820 215112008 Page 96 of 1820 215112008 Page 97 of 1820 215112008 Page 98 of 1820 215112008 Page 99 of 1820 215112008 Page 100 of 1820 215112008 Page 101 of 1820 215112008 Page 102 of 1820 215112008 Page 103 of 1820 215112008 Page 104 of 1820 215112008 Page 105 of 1820 215112008 Page 106 of 1820 215112008 Page 107 of 1820 215112008 Page 108 of 1820 215112008 Page 109 of 1820 215112008 Page 110 of 1820 215112008 Page 111 of 1820 215112008 Page 112 of 1820 215112008 Page 113 of 1820 215112008 Page 114 of 1820 215112008 Page 115 of 1820 215112008 Page 116 of 1820 215112008 Page 117 of 1820 215112008 Page 118 of 1820 215112008 Page 119 of 1820 215112008 Page 120 of 1820 215112008 Page 121 of 1820 215112008 Page 122 of 1820 215112008 Page 123 of 1820 215112008 Page 124 of 1820 215112008 Page 125 of 1820 215112008 Page 126 of 1820 215112008 Page 127 of 1820 215112008 Page 128 of 1820 215112008 Page 129 of 1820 215112008 Page 130 of 1820 215112008 Page 131 of 1820 215112008 Page 132 of 1820 215112008 Page 133 of 1820 215112008 Page 134 of 1820 215112008 Page 135 of 1820 215112008 Page 136 of 1820 215112008 Page 137 of 1820 215112008 Page 138 of 1820 215112008 Page 139 of 1820 215112008 Page 140 of 1820 215112008 Page 141 of 1820 215112008 Page 142 of 1820 215112008 Page 143 of 1820 215112008 Page 144 of 1820 215112008 Page 145 of 1820 215112008 Page 146 of 1820 215112008 Page 147 of 1820 215112008 Page 148 of 1820 215112008 Page 149 of 1820 215112008 Page 150 of 1820 215112008 Page 151 of 1820 215112008 Page 152 of 1820 215112008 Page 153 of 1820 215112008 Page 154 of 1820 215112008 Page 155 of 1820 215112008 Page 156 of 1820 215112008 Page 157 of 1820 215112008 Page 158 of 1820 215112008 Page 159 of 1820 215112008 Page 160 of 1820 215112008 Page 161 of 1820 215112008 Page 162 of 1820 215112008 Page 163 of 1820 215112008 Page 164 of 1820 215112008 Page 165 of 1820 215112008 Page 166 of 1820 215112008 Page 167 of 1820 215112008 Page 168 of 1820 215112008 Page 169 of 1820 215112008 Page 170 of 1820 215112008 Page 171 of 1820 215112008 Page 172 of 1820 215112008 Page 173 of 1820 215112008 Page 174 of 1820 215112008 Page 175 of 1820 215112008 Page 176 of 1820 215112008 Page 177 of 1820 215112008 Page 178 of 1820 215112008 Page 179 of 1820 215112008 Page 180 of 1820 215112008 Page 181 of 1820 215112008 Page 182 of 1820 215112008 Page 183 of 1820 215112008 Page 184 of 1820 215112008 Page 185 of 1820 215112008 Page 186 of 1820 215112008 Page 187 of 1820 215112008 Page 188 of 1820 215112008 Page 189 of 1820 215112008 Page 190 of 1820 215112008 Page 191 of 1820 215112008 Page 192 of 1820 215112008 Page 193 of 1820 215112008 Page 194 of 1820 215112008 Page 195 of 1820 215112008 Page 196 of 1820 215112008 Page 197 of 1820 215112008 Page 198 of 1820 215112008 Page 199 of 1820 215112008 Page 200 of 1820 215112008 Page 201 of 1820 215112008 Page 202 of 1820 215112008 Page 203 of 1820 215112008 Page 204 of 1820 215112008 Page 205 of 1820 215112008 Page 206 of 1820 215112008 Page 207 of 1820 215112008 Page 208 of 1820 215112008 Page 209 of 1820 215112008 Page 210 of 1820 215112008 Page 211 of 1820 215112008 Page 212 of 1820 215112008 Page 213 of 1820 215112008 Page 214 of 1820 215112008 Page 215 of 1820 215112008 Page 216 of 1820 215112008 Page 217 of 1820 215112008 Page 218 of 1820 215112008 Page 219 of 1820 215112008 Page 220 of 1820 215112008 Page 221 of 1820 215112008 Page 222 of 1820 215112008 Page 223 of 1820 215112008 Page 224 of 1820 215112008 Page 225 of 1820 215112008 Page 226 of 1820 215112008 Page 227 of 1820 215112008 Page 228 of 1820 215112008 Page 229 of 1820 215112008 Page 230 of 1820 215112008 Page 231 of 1820 215112008 Page 232 of 1820 215112008 Page 233 of 1820 215112008 Page 234 of 1820 215112008 Page 235 of 1820 215112008 Page 236 of 1820 215112008 Page 237 of 1820 215112008 Page 238 of 1820 215112008 Page 239 of 1820 215112008 Page 240 of 1820 215112008 Page 241 of 1820 215112008 Page 242 of 1820 215112008 Page 243 of 1820 215112008 Page 244 of 1820 215112008 Page 245 of 1820 215112008 Page 246 of 1820 215112008 Page 247 of 1820 215112008 Page 248 of 1820 215112008 Page 249 of 1820 215112008 Page 250 of 1820 215112008 Page 251 of 1820 215112008 Page 252 of 1820 215112008 Page 253 of 1820 215112008 Page 254 of 1820 215112008 Page 255 of 1820 215112008 Page 256 of 1820 215112008 Page 257 of 1820 215112008 Page 258 of 1820 215112008 Page 259 of 1820 215112008 Page 260 of 1820 215112008 Page 261 of 1820 215112008 Page 262 of 1820 215112008 Page 263 of 1820 215112008 Page 264 of 1820 215112008 Page 265 of 1820 215112008 Page 266 of 1820 215112008 Page 267 of 1820 215112008 Page 268 of 1820 215112008 Page 269 of 1820 215112008 Page 270 of 1820 215112008 Page 271 of 1820 215112008 Page 272 of 1820 215112008 Page 273 of 1820 215112008 Page 274 of 1820 215112008 Page 275 of 1820 215112008 Page 276 of 1820 215112008 Page 277 of 1820 215112008 Page 278 of 1820 215112008 Page 279 of 1820 215112008 Page 280 of 1820 215112008 Page 281 of 1820 215112008 Page 282 of 1820 215112008 Page 283 of 1820 215112008 Page 284 of 1820 215112008 Page 285 of 1820 215112008 Page 286 of 1820 215112008 Page 287 of 1820 215112008 Page 288 of 1820 215112008 Page 289 of 1820 215112008 Page 290 of 1820 215112008 Page 291 of 1820 215112008 Page 292 of 1820 215112008 Page 293 of 1820 215112008 Page 294 of 1820 215112008 Page 295 of 1820 215112008 Page 296 of 1820 215112008 Page 297 of 1820 215112008 Page 298 of 1820 215112008 Page 299 of 1820 215112008 Page 300 of 1820 215112008 Page 301 of 1820 215112008 Page 302 of 1820 215112008 Page 303 of 1820 215112008 Page 304 of 1820 215112008 Page 305 of 1820 215112008 Page 306 of 1820 215112008 Page 307 of 1820 215112008 Page 308 of 1820 215112008 Page 309 of 1820 215112008 Page 310 of 1820 215112008 Page 311 of 1820 215112008 Page 312 of 1820 215112008 Page 313 of 1820 215112008 Page 314 of 1820 215112008 Page 315 of 1820 215112008 Page 316 of 1820 215112008 Page 317 of 1820 215112008 Page 318 of 1820 215112008 Page 319 of 1820 215112008 Page 320 of 1820 215112008 Page 321 of 1820 215112008 Page 322 of 1820 215112008 Page 323 of 1820 215112008 Page 324 of 1820 215112008 Page 325 of 1820 215112008 Page 326 of 1820 215112008 Page 327 of 1820 215112008 Page 328 of 1820 215112008 Page 329 of 1820 215112008 Page 330 of 1820 215112008 Page 331 of 1820 215112008 Page 332 of 1820 215112008 Page 333 of 1820 215112008 Page 334 of 1820 215112008 Page 335 of 1820 215112008 Page 336 of 1820 215112008 Page 337 of 1820 215112008 Page 338 of 1820 215112008 Page 339 of 1820 215112008 Page 340 of 1820 215112008 Page 341 of 1820 215112008 Page 342 of 1820 215112008 Page 343 of 1820 215112008 Page 344 of 1820 215112008 Page 345 of 1820 215112008 Page 346 of 1820 215112008 Page 347 of 1820 215112008 Page 348 of 1820 215112008 Page 349 of 1820 215112008 Page 350 of 1820 215112008 Page 351 of 1820 215112008 Page 352 of 1820 215112008 Page 353 of 1820 215112008 Page 354 of 1820 215112008 Page 355 of 1820 215112008 Page 356 of 1820 215112008 Page 357 of 1820 215112008 Page 358 of 1820 215112008 Page 359 of 1820 215112008 Page 360 of 1820 215112008 Page 361 of 1820 215112008 Page 362 of 1820 215112008 Page 363 of 1820 215112008 Page 364 of 1820 215112008 Page 365 of 1820 215112008 Page 366 of 1820 215112008 Page 367 of 1820 215112008 Page 368 of 1820 215112008 Page 369 of 1820 215112008 Page 370 of 1820 215112008 Page 371 of 1820 215112008 Page 372 of 1820 215112008 Page 373 of 1820 215112008 Page 374 of 1820 215112008 Page 375 of 1820 215112008 Page 376 of 1820 215112008 Page 377 of 1820 215112008 Page 378 of 1820 215112008 Page 379 of 1820 215112008 Page 380 of 1820 215112008 Page 381 of 1820 215112008 Page 382 of 1820 215112008 Page 383 of 1820 215112008 Page 384 of 1820 215112008 Page 385 of 1820 215112008 Page 386 of 1820 215112008 Page 387 of 1820 215112008 Page 388 of 1820 215112008 Page 389 of 1820 215112008 Page 390 of 1820 215112008 Page 391 of 1820 215112008 Page 392 of 1820 215112008 Page 393 of 1820 215112008 Page 394 of 1820 215112008 Page 395 of 1820 215112008 Page 396 of 1820 215112008 Page 397 of 1820 215112008 Page 398 of 1820 215112008 Page 399 of 1820 215112008 Page 400 of 1820 215112008 Page 401 of 1820 215112008 Page 402 of 1820 215112008 Page 403 of 1820 215112008 Page 404 of 1820 215112008 Page 405 of 1820 215112008 Page 406 of 1820 215112008 Page 407 of 1820 215112008 Page 408 of 1820 215112008 Page 409 of 1820 215112008 Page 410 of 1820 215112008 Page 411 of 1820 215112008 Page 412 of 1820 215112008 Page 413 of 1820 215112008 Page 414 of 1820 215112008 Page 415 of 1820 215112008 Page 416 of 1820 215112008 Page 417 of 1820 215112008 Page 418 of 1820 215112008 Page 419 of 1820 215112008 Page 420 of 1820 215112008 Page 421 of 1820 215112008 Page 422 of 1820 215112008 Page 423 of 1820 215112008 Page 424 of 1820 215112008 Page 425 of 1820 215112008 Page 426 of 1820 215112008 Page 427 of 1820 215112008 Page 428 of 1820 215112008 Page 429 of 1820 215112008 Page 430 of 1820 215112008 Page 431 of 1820 215112008 Page 432 of 1820 215112008 Page 433 of 1820 215112008 Page 434 of 1820 215112008 Page 435 of 1820 215112008 Page 436 of 1820 215112008 Page 437 of 1820 215112008 Page 438 of 1820 215112008 Page 439 of 1820 215112008 Page 440 of 1820 215112008 Page 441 of 1820 215112008 Page 442 of 1820 215112008 Page 443 of 1820 215112008 Page 444 of 1820 215112008 Page 445 of 1820 215112008 Page 446 of 1820 215112008 Page 447 of 1820 215112008 Page 448 of 1820 215112008 Page 449 of 1820 215112008 Page 450 of 1820 215112008 Page 451 of 1820 215112008 Page 452 of 1820 215112008 Page 453 of 1820 215112008 Page 454 of 1820 215112008 Page 455 of 1820 215112008 Page 456 of 1820 215112008 Page 457 of 1820 215112008 Page 458 of 1820 215112008 Page 459 of 1820 215112008 Page 460 of 1820 215112008 Page 461 of 1820 215112008 Page 462 of 1820 215112008 Page 463 of 1820 215112008 Page 464 of 1820 215112008 Page 465 of 1820 215112008 Page 466 of 1820 215112008 Page 467 of 1820 215112008 Page 468 of 1820 215112008 Page 469 of 1820 215112008 Page 470 of 1820 215112008 Page 471 of 1820 215112008 Page 472 of 1820 215112008 Page 473 of 1820 215112008 Page 474 of 1820 215112008 Page 475 of 1820 215112008 Page 476 of 1820 215112008 Page 477 of 1820 215112008 Page 478 of 1820 215112008 Page 479 of 1820 215112008 Page 480 of 1820 215112008 Page 481 of 1820 215112008 Page 482 of 1820 215112008 Page 483 of 1820 215112008 Page 484 of 1820 215112008 Page 485 of 1820 215112008 Page 486 of 1820 215112008 Page 487 of 1820 215112008 Page 488 of 1820 215112008 Page 489 of 1820 215112008 Page 490 of 1820 215112008 Page 491 of 1820 215112008 Page 492 of 1820 215112008 Page 493 of 1820 215112008 Page 494 of 1820 215112008 Page 495 of 1820 215112008 Page 496 of 1820 215112008 Page 497 of 1820 215112008 Page 498 of 1820 215112008 Page 499 of 1820 215112008 Page 500 of 1820 215112008 Page 501 of 1820 215112008 Page 502 of 1820 215112008 Page 503 of 1820 215112008 Page 504 of 1820 215112008 Page 505 of 1820 215112008 Page 506 of 1820 215112008 Page 507 of 1820 215112008 Page 508 of 1820 215112008 Page 509 of 1820 215112008 Page 510 of 1820 215112008 Page 511 of 1820 215112008 Page 512 of 1820 215112008 Page 513 of 1820 215112008 Page 514 of 1820 215112008 Page 515 of 1820 215112008 Page 516 of 1820 215112008 Page 517 of 1820 215112008 Page 518 of 1820 215112008 Page 519 of 1820 215112008 Page 520 of 1820 215112008 Page 521 of 1820 215112008 Page 522 of 1820 215112008 Page 523 of 1820 215112008 Page 524 of 1820 215112008 Page 525 of 1820 215112008 Page 526 of 1820 215112008 Page 527 of 1820 215112008 Page 528 of 1820 215112008 Page 529 of 1820 215112008 Page 530 of 1820 215112008 Page 531 of 1820 215112008 Page 532 of 1820 215112008 Page 533 of 1820 215112008 Page 534 of 1820 215112008 Page 535 of 1820 215112008 Page 536 of 1820 215112008 Page 537 of 1820 215112008 Page 538 of 1820 215112008 Page 539 of 1820 215112008 Page 540 of 1820 215112008 Page 541 of 1820 215112008 Page 542 of 1820 215112008 Page 543 of 1820 215112008 Page 544 of 1820 215112008 Page 545 of 1820 215112008 Page 546 of 1820 215112008 Page 547 of 1820 215112008 Page 548 of 1820 215112008 Page 549 of 1820 215112008 Page 550 of 1820 215112008 Page 551 of 1820 215112008 Page 552 of 1820 215112008 Page 553 of 1820 215112008 Page 554 of 1820 215112008 Page 555 of 1820 215112008 Page 556 of 1820 215112008 Page 557 of 1820 215112008 Page 558 of 1820 215112008 Page 559 of 1820 215112008 Page 560 of 1820 215112008 Page 561 of 1820 215112008 Page 562 of 1820 215112008 Page 563 of 1820 215112008 Page 564 of 1820 215112008 Page 565 of 1820 215112008 Page 566 of 1820 215112008 Page 567 of 1820 215112008 Page 568 of 1820 215112008 Page 569 of 1820 215112008 Page 570 of 1820 215112008 Page 571 of 1820 215112008 Page 572 of 1820 215112008 Page 573 of 1820 215112008 Page 574 of 1820 215112008 Page 575 of 1820 215112008 Page 576 of 1820 215112008 Page 577 of 1820 215112008 Page 578 of 1820 215112008 Page 579 of 1820 215112008 Page 580 of 1820 215112008 Page 581 of 1820 215112008 Page 582 of 1820 215112008 Page 583 of 1820 215112008 Page 584 of 1820 215112008 Page 585 of 1820 215112008 Page 586 of 1820 215112008 Page 587 of 1820 215112008 Page 588 of 1820 215112008 Page 589 of 1820 215112008 Page 590 of 1820 215112008 Page 591 of 1820 215112008 Page 592 of 1820 215112008 Page 593 of 1820 215112008 Page 594 of 1820 215112008 Page 595 of 1820 215112008 Page 596 of 1820 215112008 Page 597 of 1820 215112008 Page 598 of 1820 215112008 Page 599 of 1820 215112008 Page 600 of 1820 215112008 Page 601 of 1820 215112008 Page 602 of 1820 215112008 Page 603 of 1820 215112008 Page 604 of 1820 215112008 Page 605 of 1820 215112008 Page 606 of 1820 215112008 Page 607 of 1820 215112008 Page 608 of 1820 215112008 Page 609 of 1820 215112008 Page 610 of 1820 215112008 Page 611 of 1820 215112008 Page 612 of 1820 215112008 Page 613 of 1820 215112008 Page 614 of 1820 215112008 Page 615 of 1820 215112008 Page 616 of 1820 215112008 Page 617 of 1820 215112008 Page 618 of 1820 215112008 Page 619 of 1820 215112008 Page 620 of 1820 215112008 Page 621 of 1820 215112008 Page 622 of 1820 215112008 Page 623 of 1820 215112008 Page 624 of 1820 215112008 Page 625 of 1820 215112008 Page 626 of 1820 215112008 Page 627 of 1820 215112008 Page 628 of 1820 215112008 Page 629 of 1820 215112008 Page 630 of 1820 215112008 Page 631 of 1820 215112008 Page 632 of 1820 215112008 Page 633 of 1820 215112008 Page 634 of 1820 215112008 Page 635 of 1820 215112008 Page 636 of 1820 215112008 Page 637 of 1820 215112008 Page 638 of 1820 215112008 Page 639 of 1820 215112008 Page 640 of 1820 215112008 Page 641 of 1820 215112008 Page 642 of 1820 215112008 Page 643 of 1820 215112008 Page 644 of 1820 215112008 Page 645 of 1820 215112008 Page 646 of 1820 215112008 Page 647 of 1820 215112008 Page 648 of 1820 215112008 Page 649 of 1820 215112008 Page 650 of 1820 215112008 Page 651 of 1820 215112008 Page 652 of 1820 215112008 Page 653 of 1820 215112008 Page 654 of 1820 215112008 Page 655 of 1820 215112008 Page 656 of 1820 215112008 Page 657 of 1820 215112008 Page 658 of 1820 215112008 Page 659 of 1820 215112008 Page 660 of 1820 215112008 Page 661 of 1820 215112008 Page 662 of 1820 215112008 Page 663 of 1820 215112008 Page 664 of 1820 215112008 Page 665 of 1820 215112008 Page 666 of 1820 215112008 Page 667 of 1820 215112008 Page 668 of 1820 215112008 Page 669 of 1820 215112008 Page 670 of 1820 215112008 Page 671 of 1820 215112008 Page 672 of 1820 215112008 Page 673 of 1820 215112008 Page 674 of 1820 215112008 Page 675 of 1820 215112008 Page 676 of 1820 215112008 Page 677 of 1820 215112008 Page 678 of 1820 215112008 Page 679 of 1820 215112008 Page 680 of 1820 215112008 Page 681 of 1820 215112008 Page 682 of 1820 215112008 Page 683 of 1820 215112008 Page 684 of 1820 215112008 Page 685 of 1820 215112008 Page 686 of 1820 215112008 Page 687 of 1820 215112008 Page 688 of 1820 215112008 Page 689 of 1820 215112008 Page 690 of 1820 215112008 Page 691 of 1820 215112008 Page 692 of 1820 215112008 Page 693 of 1820 215112008 Page 694 of 1820 215112008 Page 695 of 1820 215112008 Page 696 of 1820 215112008 Page 697 of 1820 215112008 Page 698 of 1820 215112008 Page 699 of 1820 215112008 Page 700 of 1820 215112008 Page 701 of 1820 215112008 Page 702 of 1820 215112008 Page 703 of 1820 215112008 Page 704 of 1820 215112008 Page 705 of 1820 215112008 Page 706 of 1820 215112008 Page 707 of 1820 215112008 Page 708 of 1820 215112008 Page 709 of 1820 215112008 Page 710 of 1820 215112008 Page 711 of 1820 215112008 Page 712 of 1820 215112008 Page 713 of 1820 215112008 Page 714 of 1820 215112008 Page 715 of 1820 215112008 Page 716 of 1820 215112008 Page 717 of 1820 215112008 Page 718 of 1820 215112008 Page 719 of 1820 215112008 Page 720 of 1820 215112008 Page 721 of 1820 215112008 Page 722 of 1820 215112008 Page 723 of 1820 215112008 Page 724 of 1820 215112008 Page 725 of 1820 215112008 Page 726 of 1820 215112008 Page 727 of 1820 215112008 Page 728 of 1820 215112008 Page 729 of 1820 215112008 Page 730 of 1820 215112008 Page 731 of 1820 215112008 Page 732 of 1820 215112008 Page 733 of 1820 215112008 Page 734 of 1820 215112008 Page 735 of 1820 215112008 Page 736 of 1820 215112008 Page 737 of 1820 215112008 Page 738 of 1820 215112008 Page 739 of 1820 215112008 Page 740 of 1820 215112008 Page 741 of 1820 215112008 Page 742 of 1820 215112008 Page 743 of 1820 215112008 Page 744 of 1820 215112008 Page 745 of 1820 215112008 Page 746 of 1820 215112008 Page 747 of 1820 215112008 Page 748 of 1820 215112008 Page 749 of 1820 215112008 Page 750 of 1820 215112008 Page 751 of 1820 215112008 Page 752 of 1820 215112008 Page 753 of 1820 215112008 Page 754 of 1820 215112008 Page 755 of 1820 215112008 Page 756 of 1820 215112008 Page 757 of 1820 215112008 Page 758 of 1820 215112008 Page 759 of 1820 215112008 Page 760 of 1820 215112008 Page 761 of 1820 215112008 Page 762 of 1820 215112008 Page 763 of 1820 215112008 Page 764 of 1820 215112008 Page 765 of 1820 215112008 Page 766 of 1820 215112008 Page 767 of 1820 215112008 Page 768 of 1820 215112008 Page 769 of 1820 215112008 Page 770 of 1820 215112008 Page 771 of 1820 215112008 Page 772 of 1820 215112008 Page 773 of 1820 215112008 Page 774 of 1820 215112008 Page 775 of 1820 215112008 Page 776 of 1820 215112008 Page 777 of 1820 215112008 Page 778 of 1820 215112008 Page 779 of 1820 215112008 Page 780 of 1820 215112008 Page 781 of 1820 215112008 Page 782 of 1820 215112008 Page 783 of 1820 215112008 Page 784 of 1820 215112008 Page 785 of 1820 215112008 Page 786 of 1820 215112008 Page 787 of 1820 215112008 Page 788 of 1820 215112008 Page 789 of 1820 215112008 Page 790 of 1820 215112008 Page 791 of 1820 215112008 Page 792 of 1820 215112008 Page 793 of 1820 215112008 Page 794 of 1820 215112008 Page 795 of 1820 215112008 Page 796 of 1820 215112008 Page 797 of 1820 215112008 Page 798 of 1820 215112008 Page 799 of 1820 215112008 Page 800 of 1820 215112008 Page 801 of 1820 215112008 Page 802 of 1820 215112008 Page 803 of 1820 215112008 Page 804 of 1820 215112008 Page 805 of 1820 215112008 Page 806 of 1820 215112008 Page 807 of 1820 215112008 Page 808 of 1820 215112008 Page 809 of 1820 215112008 Page 810 of 1820 215112008 Page 811 of 1820 215112008 Page 812 of 1820 215112008 Page 813 of 1820 215112008 Page 814 of 1820 215112008 Page 815 of 1820 215112008 Page 816 of 1820 215112008 Page 817 of 1820 215112008 Page 818 of 1820 215112008 Page 819 of 1820 215112008 Page 820 of 1820 215112008 Page 821 of 1820 215112008 Page 822 of 1820 215112008 Page 823 of 1820 215112008 Page 824 of 1820 215112008 Page 825 of 1820 215112008 Page 826 of 1820 215112008 Page 827 of 1820 215112008 Page 828 of 1820 215112008 Page 829 of 1820 215112008 Page 830 of 1820 215112008 Page 831 of 1820 215112008 Page 832 of 1820 215112008 Page 833 of 1820 215112008 Page 834 of 1820 215112008 Page 835 of 1820 215112008 Page 836 of 1820 215112008 Page 837 of 1820 215112008 Page 838 of 1820 215112008 Page 839 of 1820 215112008 Page 840 of 1820 215112008 Page 841 of 1820 215112008 Page 842 of 1820 215112008 Page 843 of 1820 215112008 Page 844 of 1820 215112008 Page 845 of 1820 215112008 Page 846 of 1820 215112008 Page 847 of 1820 215112008 Page 848 of 1820 215112008 Page 849 of 1820 215112008 Page 850 of 1820 215112008 Page 851 of 1820 215112008 Page 852 of 1820 215112008 Page 853 of 1820 215112008 Page 854 of 1820 215112008 Page 855 of 1820 215112008 Page 856 of 1820 215112008 Page 857 of 1820 215112008 Page 858 of 1820 215112008 Page 859 of 1820 215112008 Page 860 of 1820 215112008 Page 861 of 1820 215112008 Page 862 of 1820 215112008 Page 863 of 1820 215112008 Page 864 of 1820 215112008 Page 865 of 1820 215112008 Page 866 of 1820 215112008 Page 867 of 1820 215112008 Page 868 of 1820 215112008 Page 869 of 1820 215112008 Page 870 of 1820 215112008 Page 871 of 1820 215112008 Page 872 of 1820 215112008 Page 873 of 1820 215112008 Page 874 of 1820 215112008 Page 875 of 1820 215112008 Page 876 of 1820 215112008 Page 877 of 1820 215112008 Page 878 of 1820 215112008 Page 879 of 1820 215112008 Page 880 of 1820 215112008 Page 881 of 1820 215112008 Page 882 of 1820 215112008 Page 883 of 1820 215112008 Page 884 of 1820 215112008 Page 885 of 1820 215112008 Page 886 of 1820 215112008 Page 887 of 1820 215112008 Page 888 of 1820 215112008 Page 889 of 1820 215112008 Page 890 of 1820 215112008 Page 891 of 1820 215112008 Page 892 of 1820 215112008 Page 893 of 1820 215112008 Page 894 of 1820 215112008 Page 895 of 1820 215112008 Page 896 of 1820 215112008 Page 897 of 1820 215112008 Page 898 of 1820 215112008 Page 899 of 1820 215112008 Page 900 of 1820 215112008 Page 901 of 1820 215112008 Page 902 of 1820 215112008 Page 903 of 1820 215112008 Page 904 of 1820 215112008 Page 905 of 1820 215112008 Page 906 of 1820 215112008 Page 907 of 1820 215112008 Page 908 of 1820 215112008 Page 909 of 1820 215112008 Page 910 of 1820 215112008 Page 911 of 1820 215112008 Page 912 of 1820 215112008 Page 913 of 1820 215112008 Page 914 of 1820 215112008 Page 915 of 1820 215112008 Page 916 of 1820 215112008 Page 917 of 1820 215112008 Page 918 of 1820 215112008 Page 919 of 1820 215112008 Page 920 of 1820 215112008 Page 921 of 1820 215112008 Page 922 of 1820 215112008 Page 923 of 1820 215112008 Page 924 of 1820 215112008 Page 925 of 1820 215112008 Page 926 of 1820 215112008 Page 927 of 1820 215112008 Page 928 of 1820 215112008 Page 929 of 1820 215112008 Page 930 of 1820 215112008 Page 931 of 1820 215112008 Page 932 of 1820 215112008 Page 933 of 1820 215112008 Page 934 of 1820 215112008 Page 935 of 1820 215112008 Page 936 of 1820 215112008 Page 937 of 1820 215112008 Page 938 of 1820 215112008 Page 939 of 1820 215112008 Page 940 of 1820 215112008 Page 941 of 1820 215112008 Page 942 of 1820 215112008 Page 943 of 1820 215112008 Page 944 of 1820 215112008 Page 945 of 1820 215112008 Page 946 of 1820 215112008 Page 947 of 1820 215112008 Page 948 of 1820 215112008 Page 949 of 1820 215112008 Page 950 of 1820 215112008 Page 951 of 1820 215112008 Page 952 of 1820 215112008 Page 953 of 1820 215112008 Page 954 of 1820 215112008 Page 955 of 1820 215112008 Page 956 of 1820 215112008 Page 957 of 1820 215112008 Page 958 of 1820 215112008 Page 959 of 1820 215112008 Page 960 of 1820 215112008 Page 961 of 1820 215112008 Page 962 of 1820 215112008 Page 963 of 1820 215112008 Page 964 of 1820 215112008 Page 965 of 1820 215112008 Page 966 of 1820 215112008 Page 967 of 1820 215112008 Page 968 of 1820 215112008 Page 969 of 1820 215112008 Page 970 of 1820 215112008 Page 971 of 1820 215112008 Page 972 of 1820 215112008 Page 973 of 1820 215112008 Page 974 of 1820 215112008 Page 975 of 1820 215112008 Page 976 of 1820 215112008 Page 977 of 1820 215112008 Page 978 of 1820 215112008 Page 979 of 1820 215112008 Page 980 of 1820 215112008 Page 981 of 1820 215112008 Page 982 of 1820 215112008 Page 983 of 1820 215112008 Page 984 of 1820 215112008 Page 985 of 1820 215112008 Page 986 of 1820 215112008 Page 987 of 1820 215112008 Page 988 of 1820 215112008 Page 989 of 1820 215112008 Page 990 of 1820 215112008 Page 991 of 1820 215112008 Page 992 of 1820 215112008 Page 993 of 1820 215112008 Page 994 of 1820 215112008 Page 995 of 1820 215112008 Page 996 of 1820 215112008 Page 997 of 1820 215112008 Page 998 of 1820 215112008 Page 999 of 1820 215112008 Page 1000 of 1820 215112008 Page 1001 of 1820 215112008 Page 1002 of 1820 215112008 Page 1003 of 1820 215112008 Page 1004 of 1820 215112008 Page 1005 of 1820 215112008 Page 1006 of 1820 215112008 Page 1007 of 1820 215112008 Page 1008 of 1820 215112008 Page 1009 of 1820 215112008 Page 1010 of 1820 215112008 Page 1011 of 1820 215112008 Page 1012 of 1820 215112008 Page 1013 of 1820 215112008 Page 1014 of 1820 215112008 Page 1015 of 1820 215112008 Page 1016 of 1820 215112008 Page 1017 of 1820 215112008 Page 1018 of 1820 215112008 Page 1019 of 1820 215112008 Page 1020 of 1820 215112008 Page 1021 of 1820 215112008 Page 1022 of 1820 215112008 Page 1023 of 1820 215112008 Page 1024 of 1820 215112008 Page 1025 of 1820 215112008 Page 1026 of 1820 215112008 Page 1027 of 1820 215112008 Page 1028 of 1820 215112008 Page 1029 of 1820 215112008 Page 1030 of 1820 215112008 Page 1031 of 1820 215112008 Page 1032 of 1820 215112008 Page 1033 of 1820 215112008 Page 1034 of 1820 215112008 Page 1035 of 1820 215112008 Page 1036 of 1820 215112008 Page 1037 of 1820 215112008 Page 1038 of 1820 215112008 Page 1039 of 1820 215112008 Page 1040 of 1820 215112008 Page 1041 of 1820 215112008 Page 1042 of 1820 215112008 Page 1043 of 1820 215112008 Page 1044 of 1820 215112008 Page 1045 of 1820 215112008 Page 1046 of 1820 215112008 Page 1047 of 1820 215112008 Page 1048 of 1820 215112008 Page 1049 of 1820 215112008 Page 1050 of 1820 215112008 Page 1051 of 1820 215112008 Page 1052 of 1820 215112008 Page 1053 of 1820 215112008 Page 1054 of 1820 215112008 Page 1055 of 1820 215112008 Page 1056 of 1820 215112008 Page 1057 of 1820 215112008 Page 1058 of 1820 215112008 Page 1059 of 1820 215112008 Page 1060 of 1820 215112008 Page 1061 of 1820 215112008 Page 1062 of 1820 215112008 Page 1063 of 1820 215112008 Page 1064 of 1820 215112008 Page 1065 of 1820 215112008 Page 1066 of 1820 215112008 Page 1067 of 1820 215112008 Page 1068 of 1820 215112008 Page 1069 of 1820 215112008 Page 1070 of 1820 215112008 Page 1071 of 1820 215112008 Page 1072 of 1820 215112008 Page 1073 of 1820 215112008 Page 1074 of 1820 215112008 Page 1075 of 1820 215112008 Page 1076 of 1820 215112008 Page 1077 of 1820 215112008 Page 1078 of 1820 215112008 Page 1079 of 1820 215112008 Page 1080 of 1820 215112008 Page 1081 of 1820 215112008 Page 1082 of 1820 215112008 Page 1083 of 1820 215112008 Page 1084 of 1820 215112008 Page 1085 of 1820 215112008 Page 1086 of 1820 215112008 Page 1087 of 1820 215112008 Page 1088 of 1820 215112008 Page 1089 of 1820 215112008 Page 1090 of 1820 215112008 Page 1091 of 1820 215112008 Page 1092 of 1820 215112008 Page 1093 of 1820 215112008 Page 1094 of 1820 215112008 Page 1095 of 1820 215112008 Page 1096 of 1820 215112008 Page 1097 of 1820 215112008 Page 1098 of 1820 215112008 Page 1099 of 1820 215112008 Page 1100 of 1820 215112008 Page 1101 of 1820 215112008 Page 1102 of 1820 215112008 Page 1103 of 1820 215112008 Page 1104 of 1820 215112008 Page 1105 of 1820 215112008 Page 1106 of 1820 215112008 Page 1107 of 1820 215112008 Page 1108 of 1820 215112008 Page 1109 of 1820 215112008 Page 1110 of 1820 215112008 Page 1111 of 1820 215112008 Page 1112 of 1820 215112008 Page 1113 of 1820 215112008 Page 1114 of 1820 215112008 Page 1115 of 1820 215112008 Page 1116 of 1820 215112008 Page 1117 of 1820 215112008 Page 1118 of 1820 215112008 Page 1119 of 1820 215112008 Page 1120 of 1820 215112008 Page 1121 of 1820 215112008 Page 1122 of 1820 215112008 Page 1123 of 1820 215112008 Page 1124 of 1820 215112008 Page 1125 of 1820 215112008 Page 1126 of 1820 215112008 Page 1127 of 1820 215112008 Page 1128 of 1820 215112008 Page 1129 of 1820 215112008 Page 1130 of 1820 215112008 Page 1131 of 1820 215112008 Page 1132 of 1820 215112008 Page 1133 of 1820 215112008 Page 1134 of 1820 215112008 Page 1135 of 1820 215112008 Page 1136 of 1820 215112008 Page 1137 of 1820 215112008 Page 1138 of 1820 215112008 Page 1139 of 1820 215112008 Page 1140 of 1820 215112008 Page 1141 of 1820 215112008 Page 1142 of 1820 215112008 Page 1143 of 1820 215112008 Page 1144 of 1820 215112008 Page 1145 of 1820 215112008 Page 1146 of 1820 215112008 Page 1147 of 1820 215112008 Page 1148 of 1820 215112008 Page 1149 of 1820 215112008 Page 1150 of 1820 215112008 Page 1151 of 1820 215112008 Page 1152 of 1820 215112008 Page 1153 of 1820 215112008 Page 1154 of 1820 215112008 Page 1155 of 1820 215112008 Page 1156 of 1820 215112008 Page 1157 of 1820 215112008 Page 1158 of 1820 215112008 Page 1159 of 1820 215112008 Page 1160 of 1820 215112008 Page 1161 of 1820 215112008 Page 1162 of 1820 215112008 Page 1163 of 1820 215112008 Page 1164 of 1820 215112008 Page 1165 of 1820 215112008 Page 1166 of 1820 215112008 Page 1167 of 1820 215112008 Page 1168 of 1820 215112008 Page 1169 of 1820 215112008 Page 1170 of 1820 215112008 Page 1171 of 1820 215112008 Page 1172 of 1820 215112008 Page 1173 of 1820 215112008 Page 1174 of 1820 215112008 Page 1175 of 1820 215112008 Page 1176 of 1820 215112008 Page 1177 of 1820 215112008 Page 1178 of 1820 215112008 Page 1179 of 1820 215112008 Page 1180 of 1820 215112008 Page 1181 of 1820 215112008 Page 1182 of 1820 215112008 Page 1183 of 1820 215112008 Page 1184 of 1820 215112008 Page 1185 of 1820 215112008 Page 1186 of 1820 215112008 Page 1187 of 1820 215112008 Page 1188 of 1820 215112008 Page 1189 of 1820 215112008 Page 1190 of 1820 215112008 Page 1191 of 1820 215112008 Page 1192 of 1820 215112008 Page 1193 of 1820 215112008 Page 1194 of 1820 215112008 Page 1195 of 1820 215112008 Page 1196 of 1820 215112008 Page 1197 of 1820 215112008 Page 1198 of 1820 215112008 Page 1199 of 1820 215112008 Page 1200 of 1820 215112008 Page 1201 of 1820 215112008 Page 1202 of 1820 215112008 Page 1203 of 1820 215112008 Page 1204 of 1820 215112008 Page 1205 of 1820 215112008 Page 1206 of 1820 215112008 Page 1207 of 1820 215112008 Page 1208 of 1820 215112008 Page 1209 of 1820 215112008 Page 1210 of 1820 215112008 Page 1211 of 1820 215112008 Page 1212 of 1820 215112008 Page 1213 of 1820 215112008 Page 1214 of 1820 215112008 Page 1215 of 1820 215112008 Page 1216 of 1820 215112008 Page 1217 of 1820 215112008 Page 1218 of 1820 215112008 Page 1219 of 1820 215112008 Page 1220 of 1820 215112008 Page 1221 of 1820 215112008 Page 1222 of 1820 215112008 Page 1223 of 1820 215112008 Page 1224 of 1820 215112008 Page 1225 of 1820 215112008 Page 1226 of 1820 215112008 Page 1227 of 1820 215112008 Page 1228 of 1820 215112008 Page 1229 of 1820 215112008 Page 1230 of 1820 215112008 Page 1231 of 1820 215112008 Page 1232 of 1820 215112008 Page 1233 of 1820 215112008 Page 1234 of 1820 215112008 Page 1235 of 1820 215112008 Page 1236 of 1820 215112008 Page 1237 of 1820 215112008 Page 1238 of 1820 215112008 Page 1239 of 1820 215112008 Page 1240 of 1820 215112008 Page 1241 of 1820 215112008 Page 1242 of 1820 215112008 Page 1243 of 1820 215112008 Page 1244 of 1820 215112008 Page 1245 of 1820 215112008 Page 1246 of 1820 215112008 Page 1247 of 1820 215112008 Page 1248 of 1820 215112008 Page 1249 of 1820 215112008 Page 1250 of 1820 215112008 Page 1251 of 1820 215112008 Page 1252 of 1820 215112008 Page 1253 of 1820 215112008 Page 1254 of 1820 215112008 Page 1255 of 1820 215112008 Page 1256 of 1820 215112008 Page 1257 of 1820 215112008 Page 1258 of 1820 215112008 Page 1259 of 1820 215112008 Page 1260 of 1820 215112008 Page 1261 of 1820 215112008 Page 1262 of 1820 215112008 Page 1263 of 1820 215112008 Page 1264 of 1820 215112008 Page 1265 of 1820 215112008 Page 1266 of 1820 215112008 Page 1267 of 1820 215112008 Page 1268 of 1820 215112008 Page 1269 of 1820 215112008 Page 1270 of 1820 215112008 Page 1271 of 1820 215112008 Page 1272 of 1820 215112008 Page 1273 of 1820 215112008 Page 1274 of 1820 215112008 Page 1275 of 1820 215112008 Page 1276 of 1820 215112008 Page 1277 of 1820 215112008 Page 1278 of 1820 215112008 Page 1279 of 1820 215112008 Page 1280 of 1820 215112008 Page 1281 of 1820 215112008 Page 1282 of 1820 215112008 Page 1283 of 1820 215112008 Page 1284 of 1820 215112008 Page 1285 of 1820 215112008 Page 1286 of 1820 215112008 Page 1287 of 1820 215112008 Page 1288 of 1820 215112008 Page 1289 of 1820 215112008 Page 1290 of 1820 215112008 Page 1291 of 1820 215112008 Page 1292 of 1820 215112008 Page 1293 of 1820 215112008 Page 1294 of 1820 215112008 Page 1295 of 1820 215112008 Page 1296 of 1820 215112008 Page 1297 of 1820 215112008 Page 1298 of 1820 215112008 Page 1299 of 1820 215112008 Page 1300 of 1820 215112008 Page 1301 of 1820 215112008 Page 1302 of 1820 215112008 Page 1303 of 1820 215112008 Page 1304 of 1820 215112008 Page 1305 of 1820 215112008 Page 1306 of 1820 215112008 Page 1307 of 1820 215112008 Page 1308 of 1820 215112008 Page 1309 of 1820 215112008 Page 1310 of 1820 215112008 Page 1311 of 1820 215112008 Page 1312 of 1820 215112008 Page 1313 of 1820 215112008 Page 1314 of 1820 215112008 Page 1315 of 1820 215112008 Page 1316 of 1820 215112008 Page 1317 of 1820 215112008 Page 1318 of 1820 215112008 Page 1319 of 1820 215112008 Page 1320 of 1820 215112008 Page 1321 of 1820 215112008 Page 1322 of 1820 215112008 Page 1323 of 1820 215112008 Page 1324 of 1820 215112008 Page 1325 of 1820 215112008 Page 1326 of 1820 215112008 Page 1327 of 1820 215112008 Page 1328 of 1820 215112008 Page 1329 of 1820 215112008 Page 1330 of 1820 215112008 Page 1331 of 1820 215112008 Page 1332 of 1820 215112008 Page 1333 of 1820 215112008 Page 1334 of 1820 215112008 Page 1335 of 1820 215112008 Page 1336 of 1820 215112008 Page 1337 of 1820 215112008 Page 1338 of 1820 215112008 Page 1339 of 1820 215112008 Page 1340 of 1820 215112008 Page 1341 of 1820 215112008 Page 1342 of 1820 215112008 Page 1343 of 1820 215112008 Page 1344 of 1820 215112008 Page 1345 of 1820 215112008 Page 1346 of 1820 215112008 Page 1347 of 1820 215112008 Page 1348 of 1820 215112008 Page 1349 of 1820 215112008 Page 1350 of 1820 215112008 Page 1351 of 1820 215112008 Page 1352 of 1820 215112008 Page 1353 of 1820 215112008 Page 1354 of 1820 215112008 Page 1355 of 1820 215112008 Page 1356 of 1820 215112008 Page 1357 of 1820 215112008 Page 1358 of 1820 215112008 Page 1359 of 1820 215112008 Page 1360 of 1820 215112008 Page 1361 of 1820 215112008 Page 1362 of 1820 215112008 Page 1363 of 1820 215112008 Page 1364 of 1820 215112008 Page 1365 of 1820 215112008 Page 1366 of 1820 215112008 Page 1367 of 1820 215112008 Page 1368 of 1820 215112008 Page 1369 of 1820 215112008 Page 1370 of 1820 215112008 Page 1371 of 1820 215112008 Page 1372 of 1820 215112008 Page 1373 of 1820 215112008 Page 1374 of 1820 215112008 Page 1375 of 1820 215112008 Page 1376 of 1820 215112008 Page 1377 of 1820 215112008 Page 1378 of 1820 215112008 Page 1379 of 1820 215112008 Page 1380 of 1820 215112008 Page 1381 of 1820 215112008 Page 1382 of 1820 215112008 Page 1383 of 1820 215112008 Page 1384 of 1820 215112008 Page 1385 of 1820 215112008 Page 1386 of 1820 215112008 Page 1387 of 1820 215112008 Page 1388 of 1820 215112008 Page 1389 of 1820 215112008 Page 1390 of 1820 215112008 Page 1391 of 1820 215112008 Page 1392 of 1820 215112008 Page 1393 of 1820 215112008 Page 1394 of 1820 215112008 Page 1395 of 1820 215112008 Page 1396 of 1820 215112008 Page 1397 of 1820 215112008 Page 1398 of 1820 215112008 Page 1399 of 1820 215112008 Page 1400 of 1820 215112008 Page 1401 of 1820 215112008 Page 1402 of 1820 215112008 Page 1403 of 1820 215112008 Page 1404 of 1820 215112008 Page 1405 of 1820 215112008 Page 1406 of 1820 215112008 Page 1407 of 1820 215112008 Page 1408 of 1820 215112008 Page 1409 of 1820 215112008 Page 1410 of 1820 215112008 Page 1411 of 1820 215112008 Page 1412 of 1820 215112008 Page 1413 of 1820 215112008 Page 1414 of 1820 215112008 Page 1415 of 1820 215112008 Page 1416 of 1820 215112008 Page 1417 of 1820 215112008 Page 1418 of 1820 215112008 Page 1419 of 1820 215112008 Page 1420 of 1820 215112008 Page 1421 of 1820 215112008 Page 1422 of 1820 215112008 Page 1423 of 1820 215112008 Page 1424 of 1820 215112008 Page 1425 of 1820 215112008 Page 1426 of 1820 215112008 Page 1427 of 1820 215112008 Page 1428 of 1820 215112008 Page 1429 of 1820 215112008 Page 1430 of 1820 215112008 Page 1431 of 1820 215112008 Page 1432 of 1820 215112008 Page 1433 of 1820 215112008 Page 1434 of 1820 215112008 Page 1435 of 1820 215112008 Page 1436 of 1820 215112008 Page 1437 of 1820 215112008 Page 1438 of 1820 215112008 Page 1439 of 1820 215112008 Page 1440 of 1820 215112008 Page 1441 of 1820 215112008 Page 1442 of 1820 215112008 Page 1443 of 1820 215112008 Page 1444 of 1820 215112008 Page 1445 of 1820 215112008 Page 1446 of 1820 215112008 Page 1447 of 1820 215112008 Page 1448 of 1820 215112008 Page 1449 of 1820 215112008 Page 1450 of 1820 215112008 Page 1451 of 1820 215112008 Page 1452 of 1820 215112008 Page 1453 of 1820 215112008 Page 1454 of 1820 215112008 Page 1455 of 1820 215112008 Page 1456 of 1820 215112008 Page 1457 of 1820 215112008 Page 1458 of 1820 215112008 Page 1459 of 1820 215112008 Page 1460 of 1820 215112008 Page 1461 of 1820 215112008 Page 1462 of 1820 215112008 Page 1463 of 1820 215112008 Page 1464 of 1820 215112008 Page 1465 of 1820 215112008 Page 1466 of 1820 215112008 Page 1467 of 1820 215112008 Page 1468 of 1820 215112008 Page 1469 of 1820 215112008 Page 1470 of 1820 215112008 Page 1471 of 1820 215112008 Page 1472 of 1820 215112008 Page 1473 of 1820 215112008 Page 1474 of 1820 215112008 Page 1475 of 1820 215112008 Page 1476 of 1820 215112008 Page 1477 of 1820 215112008 Page 1478 of 1820 215112008 Page 1479 of 1820 215112008 Page 1480 of 1820 215112008 Page 1481 of 1820 215112008 Page 1482 of 1820 215112008 Page 1483 of 1820 215112008 Page 1484 of 1820 215112008 Page 1485 of 1820 215112008 Page 1486 of 1820 215112008 Page 1487 of 1820 215112008 Page 1488 of 1820 215112008 Page 1489 of 1820 215112008 Page 1490 of 1820 215112008 Page 1491 of 1820 215112008 Page 1492 of 1820 215112008 Page 1493 of 1820 215112008 Page 1494 of 1820 215112008 Page 1495 of 1820 215112008 Page 1496 of 1820 215112008 Page 1497 of 1820 215112008 Page 1498 of 1820 215112008 Page 1499 of 1820 215112008 Page 1500 of 1820 215112008 Page 1501 of 1820 215112008 Page 1502 of 1820 215112008 Page 1503 of 1820 215112008 Page 1504 of 1820 215112008 Page 1505 of 1820 215112008 Page 1506 of 1820 215112008 Page 1507 of 1820 215112008 Page 1508 of 1820 215112008 Page 1509 of 1820 215112008 Page 1510 of 1820 215112008 Page 1511 of 1820 215112008 Page 1512 of 1820 215112008 Page 1513 of 1820 215112008 Page 1514 of 1820 215112008 Page 1515 of 1820 215112008 Page 1516 of 1820 215112008 Page 1517 of 1820 215112008 Page 1518 of 1820 215112008 Page 1519 of 1820 215112008 Page 1520 of 1820 215112008 Page 1521 of 1820 215112008 Page 1522 of 1820 215112008 Page 1523 of 1820 215112008 Page 1524 of 1820 215112008 Page 1525 of 1820 215112008 Page 1526 of 1820 215112008 Page 1527 of 1820 215112008 Page 1528 of 1820 215112008 Page 1529 of 1820 215112008 Page 1530 of 1820 215112008 Page 1531 of 1820 215112008 Page 1532 of 1820 215112008 Page 1533 of 1820 215112008 Page 1534 of 1820 215112008 Page 1535 of 1820 215112008 Page 1536 of 1820 215112008 Page 1537 of 1820 215112008 Page 1538 of 1820 215112008 Page 1539 of 1820 215112008 Page 1540 of 1820 215112008 Page 1541 of 1820 215112008 Page 1542 of 1820 215112008 Page 1543 of 1820 215112008 Page 1544 of 1820 215112008 Page 1545 of 1820 215112008 Page 1546 of 1820 215112008 Page 1547 of 1820 215112008 Page 1548 of 1820 215112008 Page 1549 of 1820 215112008 Page 1550 of 1820 215112008 Page 1551 of 1820 215112008 Page 1552 of 1820 215112008 Page 1553 of 1820 215112008 Page 1554 of 1820 215112008 Page 1555 of 1820 215112008 Page 1556 of 1820 215112008 Page 1557 of 1820 215112008 Page 1558 of 1820 215112008 Page 1559 of 1820 215112008 Page 1560 of 1820 215112008 Page 1561 of 1820 215112008 Page 1562 of 1820 215112008 Page 1563 of 1820 215112008 Page 1564 of 1820 215112008 Page 1565 of 1820 215112008 Page 1566 of 1820 215112008 Page 1567 of 1820 215112008 Page 1568 of 1820 215112008 Page 1569 of 1820 215112008 Page 1570 of 1820 215112008 Page 1571 of 1820 215112008 Page 1572 of 1820 215112008 Page 1573 of 1820 215112008 Page 1574 of 1820 215112008 Page 1575 of 1820 215112008 Page 1576 of 1820 215112008 Page 1577 of 1820 215112008 Page 1578 of 1820 215112008 Page 1579 of 1820 215112008 Page 1580 of 1820 215112008 Page 1581 of 1820 215112008 Page 1582 of 1820 215112008 Page 1583 of 1820 215112008 Page 1584 of 1820 215112008 Page 1585 of 1820 215112008 Page 1586 of 1820 215112008 Page 1587 of 1820 215112008 Page 1588 of 1820 215112008 Page 1589 of 1820 215112008 Page 1590 of 1820 215112008 Page 1591 of 1820 215112008 Page 1592 of 1820 215112008 Page 1593 of 1820 215112008 Page 1594 of 1820 215112008 Page 1595 of 1820 215112008 Page 1596 of 1820 215112008 Page 1597 of 1820 215112008 Page 1598 of 1820 215112008 Page 1599 of 1820 215112008 Page 1600 of 1820 215112008 Page 1601 of 1820 215112008 Page 1602 of 1820 215112008 Page 1603 of 1820 215112008 Page 1604 of 1820 215112008 Page 1605 of 1820 215112008 Page 1606 of 1820 215112008 Page 1607 of 1820 215112008 Page 1608 of 1820 215112008 Page 1609 of 1820 215112008 Page 1610 of 1820 215112008 Page 1611 of 1820 215112008 Page 1612 of 1820 215112008 Page 1613 of 1820 215112008 Page 1614 of 1820 215112008 Page 1615 of 1820 215112008 Page 1616 of 1820 215112008 Page 1617 of 1820 215112008 Page 1618 of 1820 215112008 Page 1619 of 1820 215112008 Page 1620 of 1820 215112008 Page 1621 of 1820 215112008 Page 1622 of 1820 215112008 Page 1623 of 1820 215112008 Page 1624 of 1820 215112008 Page 1625 of 1820 215112008 Page 1626 of 1820 215112008 Page 1627 of 1820 215112008 Page 1628 of 1820 215112008 Page 1629 of 1820 215112008 Page 1630 of 1820 215112008 Page 1631 of 1820 215112008 Page 1632 of 1820 215112008 Page 1633 of 1820 215112008 Page 1634 of 1820 215112008 Page 1635 of 1820 215112008 Page 1636 of 1820 215112008 Page 1637 of 1820 215112008 Page 1638 of 1820 215112008 Page 1639 of 1820 215112008 Page 1640 of 1820 215112008 Page 1641 of 1820 215112008 Page 1642 of 1820 215112008 Page 1643 of 1820 215112008 Page 1644 of 1820 215112008 Page 1645 of 1820 215112008 Page 1646 of 1820 215112008 Page 1647 of 1820 215112008 Page 1648 of 1820 215112008 Page 1649 of 1820 215112008 Page 1650 of 1820 215112008 Page 1651 of 1820 215112008 Page 1652 of 1820 215112008 Page 1653 of 1820 215112008 Page 1654 of 1820 215112008 Page 1655 of 1820 215112008 Page 1656 of 1820 215112008 Page 1657 of 1820 215112008 Page 1658 of 1820 215112008 Page 1659 of 1820 215112008 Page 1660 of 1820 215112008 Page 1661 of 1820 215112008 Page 1662 of 1820 215112008 Page 1663 of 1820 215112008 Page 1664 of 1820 215112008 Page 1665 of 1820 215112008 Page 1666 of 1820 215112008 Page 1667 of 1820 215112008 Page 1668 of 1820 215112008 Page 1669 of 1820 215112008 Page 1670 of 1820 215112008 Page 1671 of 1820 215112008 Page 1672 of 1820 215112008 Page 1673 of 1820 215112008 Page 1674 of 1820 215112008 Page 1675 of 1820 215112008 Page 1676 of 1820 215112008 Page 1677 of 1820 215112008 Page 1678 of 1820 215112008 Page 1679 of 1820 215112008 Page 1680 of 1820 215112008 Page 1681 of 1820 215112008 Page 1682 of 1820 215112008 Page 1683 of 1820 215112008 Page 1684 of 1820 215112008 Page 1685 of 1820 215112008 Page 1686 of 1820 215112008 Page 1687 of 1820 215112008 Page 1688 of 1820 215112008 Page 1689 of 1820 215112008 Page 1690 of 1820 215112008 Page 1691 of 1820 215112008 Page 1692 of 1820 215112008 Page 1693 of 1820 215112008 Page 1694 of 1820 215112008 Page 1695 of 1820 215112008 Page 1696 of 1820 215112008 Page 1697 of 1820 215112008 Page 1698 of 1820 215112008 Page 1699 of 1820 215112008 Page 1700 of 1820 215112008 Page 1701 of 1820 215112008 Page 1702 of 1820 215112008 Page 1703 of 1820 215112008 Page 1704 of 1820 215112008 Page 1705 of 1820 215112008 Page 1706 of 1820 215112008 Page 1707 of 1820 215112008 Page 1708 of 1820 215112008 Page 1709 of 1820 215112008 Page 1710 of 1820 215112008 Page 1711 of 1820 215112008 Page 1712 of 1820 215112008 Page 1713 of 1820 215112008 Page 1714 of 1820 215112008 Page 1715 of 1820 215112008 Page 1716 of 1820 215112008 Page 1717 of 1820 215112008 Page 1718 of 1820 215112008 Page 1719 of 1820 215112008 Page 1720 of 1820 215112008 Page 1721 of 1820 215112008 Page 1722 of 1820 215112008 Page 1723 of 1820 215112008 Page 1724 of 1820 215112008 Page 1725 of 1820 215112008 Page 1726 of 1820 215112008 Page 1727 of 1820 215112008 Page 1728 of 1820 215112008 Page 1729 of 1820 215112008 Page 1730 of 1820 215112008 Page 1731 of 1820 215112008 Page 1732 of 1820 215112008 Page 1733 of 1820 215112008 Page 1734 of 1820 215112008 Page 1735 of 1820 215112008 Page 1736 of 1820 215112008 Page 1737 of 1820 215112008 Page 1738 of 1820 215112008 Page 1739 of 1820 215112008 Page 1740 of 1820 215112008 Page 1741 of 1820 215112008 Page 1742 of 1820 215112008 Page 1743 of 1820 215112008 Page 1744 of 1820 215112008 Page 1745 of 1820 215112008 Page 1746 of 1820 215112008 Page 1747 of 1820 215112008 Page 1748 of 1820 215112008 Page 1749 of 1820 215112008 Page 1750 of 1820 215112008 Page 1751 of 1820 215112008 Page 1752 of 1820 215112008 Page 1753 of 1820 215112008 Page 1754 of 1820 215112008 Page 1755 of 1820 215112008 Page 1756 of 1820 215112008 Page 1757 of 1820 215112008 Page 1758 of 1820 215112008 Page 1759 of 1820 215112008 Page 1760 of 1820 215112008 Page 1761 of 1820 215112008 Page 1762 of 1820 215112008 Page 1763 of 1820 215112008 Page 1764 of 1820 215112008 Page 1765 of 1820 215112008 Page 1766 of 1820 215112008 Page 1767 of 1820 215112008 Page 1768 of 1820 215112008 Page 1769 of 1820 215112008 Page 1770 of 1820 215112008 Page 1771 of 1820 215112008 Page 1772 of 1820 215112008 Page 1773 of 1820 215112008 Page 1774 of 1820 215112008 Page 1775 of 1820 215112008 Page 1776 of 1820 215112008 Page 1777 of 1820 215112008 Page 1778 of 1820 215112008 Page 1779 of 1820 215112008 Page 1780 of 1820 215112008 Page 1781 of 1820 215112008 Page 1782 of 1820 215112008 Page 1783 of 1820 215112008 Page 1784 of 1820 215112008 Page 1785 of 1820 215112008 Page 1786 of 1820 215112008 Page 1787 of 1820 215112008 Page 1788 of 1820 215112008 Page 1789 of 1820 215112008 Page 1790 of 1820 215112008 Page 1791 of 1820 215112008 Page 1792 of 1820 215112008 Page 1793 of 1820 215112008 Page 1794 of 1820 215112008 Page 1795 of 1820 215112008 Page 1796 of 1820 215112008 Page 1797 of 1820 215112008 Page 1798 of 1820 215112008 Page 1799 of 1820 215112008 Page 1800 of 1820 215112008 Page 1801 of 1820 215112008 Page 1802 of 1820 215112008 Page 1803 of 1820 215112008 Page 1804 of 1820 215112008 Page 1805 of 1820 215112008 Page 1806 of 1820 215112008 Page 1807 of 1820 215112008 Page 1808 of 1820 215112008 Page 1809 of 1820 215112008 Page 1810 of 1820 215112008 Page 1811 of 1820 215112008 Page 1812 of 1820 215112008 Page 1813 of 1820 215112008 Page 1814 of 1820 215112008 Page 1815 of 1820 215112008 Page 1816 of 1820 215112008 Page 1817 of 1820 215112008 Page 1818 of 1820 215112008 Page 1819 of 1820 215112008 Page 1820 of 1820 215112014 Page 1 of 762 215112014 Page 2 of 762 215112014 Page 3 of 762 215112014 Page 4 of 762 215112014 Page 5 of 762 215112014 Page 6 of 762 215112014 Page 7 of 762 215112014 Page 8 of 762 215112014 Page 9 of 762 215112014 Page 10 of 762 215112014 Page 11 of 762 215112014 Page 12 of 762 215112014 Page 13 of 762 215112014 Page 14 of 762 215112014 Page 15 of 762 215112014 Page 16 of 762 215112014 Page 17 of 762 215112014 Page 18 of 762 215112014 Page 19 of 762 215112014 Page 20 of 762 215112014 Page 21 of 762 215112014 Page 22 of 762 215112014 Page 23 of 762 215112014 Page 24 of 762 215112014 Page 25 of 762 215112014 Page 26 of 762 215112014 Page 27 of 762 215112014 Page 28 of 762 215112014 Page 29 of 762 215112014 Page 30 of 762 215112014 Page 31 of 762 215112014 Page 32 of 762 215112014 Page 33 of 762 215112014 Page 34 of 762 215112014 Page 35 of 762 215112014 Page 36 of 762 215112014 Page 37 of 762 215112014 Page 38 of 762 215112014 Page 39 of 762 215112014 Page 40 of 762 215112014 Page 41 of 762 215112014 Page 42 of 762 215112014 Page 43 of 762 215112014 Page 44 of 762 215112014 Page 45 of 762 215112014 Page 46 of 762 215112014 Page 47 of 762 215112014 Page 48 of 762 215112014 Page 49 of 762 215112014 Page 50 of 762 215112014 Page 51 of 762 215112014 Page 52 of 762 215112014 Page 53 of 762 215112014 Page 54 of 762 215112014 Page 55 of 762 215112014 Page 56 of 762 215112014 Page 57 of 762 215112014 Page 58 of 762 215112014 Page 59 of 762 215112014 Page 60 of 762 215112014 Page 61 of 762 215112014 Page 62 of 762 215112014 Page 63 of 762 215112014 Page 64 of 762 215112014 Page 65 of 762 215112014 Page 66 of 762 215112014 Page 67 of 762 215112014 Page 68 of 762 215112014 Page 69 of 762 215112014 Page 70 of 762 215112014 Page 71 of 762 215112014 Page 72 of 762 215112014 Page 73 of 762 215112014 Page 74 of 762 215112014 Page 75 of 762 215112014 Page 76 of 762 215112014 Page 77 of 762 215112014 Page 78 of 762 215112014 Page 79 of 762 215112014 Page 80 of 762 215112014 Page 81 of 762 215112014 Page 82 of 762 215112014 Page 83 of 762 215112014 Page 84 of 762 215112014 Page 85 of 762 215112014 Page 86 of 762 215112014 Page 87 of 762 215112014 Page 88 of 762 215112014 Page 89 of 762 215112014 Page 90 of 762 215112014 Page 91 of 762 215112014 Page 92 of 762 215112014 Page 93 of 762 215112014 Page 94 of 762 215112014 Page 95 of 762 215112014 Page 96 of 762 215112014 Page 97 of 762 215112014 Page 98 of 762 215112014 Page 99 of 762 215112014 Page 100 of 762 215112014 Page 101 of 762 215112014 Page 102 of 762 215112014 Page 103 of 762 215112014 Page 104 of 762 215112014 Page 105 of 762 215112014 Page 106 of 762 215112014 Page 107 of 762 215112014 Page 108 of 762 215112014 Page 109 of 762 215112014 Page 110 of 762 215112014 Page 111 of 762 215112014 Page 112 of 762 215112014 Page 113 of 762 215112014 Page 114 of 762 215112014 Page 115 of 762 215112014 Page 116 of 762 215112014 Page 117 of 762 215112014 Page 118 of 762 215112014 Page 119 of 762 215112014 Page 120 of 762 215112014 Page 121 of 762 215112014 Page 122 of 762 215112014 Page 123 of 762 215112014 Page 124 of 762 215112014 Page 125 of 762 215112014 Page 126 of 762 215112014 Page 127 of 762 215112014 Page 128 of 762 215112014 Page 129 of 762 215112014 Page 130 of 762 215112014 Page 131 of 762 215112014 Page 132 of 762 215112014 Page 133 of 762 215112014 Page 134 of 762 215112014 Page 135 of 762 215112014 Page 136 of 762 215112014 Page 137 of 762 215112014 Page 138 of 762 215112014 Page 139 of 762 215112014 Page 140 of 762 215112014 Page 141 of 762 215112014 Page 142 of 762 215112014 Page 143 of 762 215112014 Page 144 of 762 215112014 Page 145 of 762 215112014 Page 146 of 762 215112014 Page 147 of 762 215112014 Page 148 of 762 215112014 Page 149 of 762 215112014 Page 150 of 762 215112014 Page 151 of 762 215112014 Page 152 of 762 215112014 Page 153 of 762 215112014 Page 154 of 762 215112014 Page 155 of 762 215112014 Page 156 of 762 215112014 Page 157 of 762 215112014 Page 158 of 762 215112014 Page 159 of 762 215112014 Page 160 of 762 215112014 Page 161 of 762 215112014 Page 162 of 762 215112014 Page 163 of 762 215112014 Page 164 of 762 215112014 Page 165 of 762 215112014 Page 166 of 762 215112014 Page 167 of 762 215112014 Page 168 of 762 215112014 Page 169 of 762 215112014 Page 170 of 762 215112014 Page 171 of 762 215112014 Page 172 of 762 215112014 Page 173 of 762 215112014 Page 174 of 762 215112014 Page 175 of 762 215112014 Page 176 of 762 215112014 Page 177 of 762 215112014 Page 178 of 762 215112014 Page 179 of 762 215112014 Page 180 of 762 215112014 Page 181 of 762 215112014 Page 182 of 762 215112014 Page 183 of 762 215112014 Page 184 of 762 215112014 Page 185 of 762 215112014 Page 186 of 762 215112014 Page 187 of 762 215112014 Page 188 of 762 215112014 Page 189 of 762 215112014 Page 190 of 762 215112014 Page 191 of 762 215112014 Page 192 of 762 215112014 Page 193 of 762 215112014 Page 194 of 762 215112014 Page 195 of 762 215112014 Page 196 of 762 215112014 Page 197 of 762 215112014 Page 198 of 762 215112014 Page 199 of 762 215112014 Page 200 of 762 215112014 Page 201 of 762 215112014 Page 202 of 762 215112014 Page 203 of 762 215112014 Page 204 of 762 215112014 Page 205 of 762 215112014 Page 206 of 762 215112014 Page 207 of 762 215112014 Page 208 of 762 215112014 Page 209 of 762 215112014 Page 210 of 762 215112014 Page 211 of 762 215112014 Page 212 of 762 215112014 Page 213 of 762 215112014 Page 214 of 762 215112014 Page 215 of 762 215112014 Page 216 of 762 215112014 Page 217 of 762 215112014 Page 218 of 762 215112014 Page 219 of 762 215112014 Page 220 of 762 215112014 Page 221 of 762 215112014 Page 222 of 762 215112014 Page 223 of 762 215112014 Page 224 of 762 215112014 Page 225 of 762 215112014 Page 226 of 762 215112014 Page 227 of 762 215112014 Page 228 of 762 215112014 Page 229 of 762 215112014 Page 230 of 762 215112014 Page 231 of 762 215112014 Page 232 of 762 215112014 Page 233 of 762 215112014 Page 234 of 762 215112014 Page 235 of 762 215112014 Page 236 of 762 215112014 Page 237 of 762 215112014 Page 238 of 762 215112014 Page 239 of 762 215112014 Page 240 of 762 215112014 Page 241 of 762 215112014 Page 242 of 762 215112014 Page 243 of 762 215112014 Page 244 of 762 215112014 Page 245 of 762 215112014 Page 246 of 762 215112014 Page 247 of 762 215112014 Page 248 of 762 215112014 Page 249 of 762 215112014 Page 250 of 762 215112014 Page 251 of 762 215112014 Page 252 of 762 215112014 Page 253 of 762 215112014 Page 254 of 762 215112014 Page 255 of 762 215112014 Page 256 of 762 215112014 Page 257 of 762 215112014 Page 258 of 762 215112014 Page 259 of 762 215112014 Page 260 of 762 215112014 Page 261 of 762 215112014 Page 262 of 762 215112014 Page 263 of 762 215112014 Page 264 of 762 215112014 Page 265 of 762 215112014 Page 266 of 762 215112014 Page 267 of 762 215112014 Page 268 of 762 215112014 Page 269 of 762 215112014 Page 270 of 762 215112014 Page 271 of 762 215112014 Page 272 of 762 215112014 Page 273 of 762 215112014 Page 274 of 762 215112014 Page 275 of 762 215112014 Page 276 of 762 215112014 Page 277 of 762 215112014 Page 278 of 762 215112014 Page 279 of 762 215112014 Page 280 of 762 215112014 Page 281 of 762 215112014 Page 282 of 762 215112014 Page 283 of 762 215112014 Page 284 of 762 215112014 Page 285 of 762 215112014 Page 286 of 762 215112014 Page 287 of 762 215112014 Page 288 of 762 215112014 Page 289 of 762 215112014 Page 290 of 762 215112014 Page 291 of 762 215112014 Page 292 of 762 215112014 Page 293 of 762 215112014 Page 294 of 762 215112014 Page 295 of 762 215112014 Page 296 of 762 215112014 Page 297 of 762 215112014 Page 298 of 762 215112014 Page 299 of 762 215112014 Page 300 of 762 215112014 Page 301 of 762 215112014 Page 302 of 762 215112014 Page 303 of 762 215112014 Page 304 of 762 215112014 Page 305 of 762 215112014 Page 306 of 762 215112014 Page 307 of 762 215112014 Page 308 of 762 215112014 Page 309 of 762 215112014 Page 310 of 762 215112014 Page 311 of 762 215112014 Page 312 of 762 215112014 Page 313 of 762 215112014 Page 314 of 762 215112014 Page 315 of 762 215112014 Page 316 of 762 215112014 Page 317 of 762 215112014 Page 318 of 762 215112014 Page 319 of 762 215112014 Page 320 of 762 215112014 Page 321 of 762 215112014 Page 322 of 762 215112014 Page 323 of 762 215112014 Page 324 of 762 215112014 Page 325 of 762 215112014 Page 326 of 762 215112014 Page 327 of 762 215112014 Page 328 of 762 215112014 Page 329 of 762 215112014 Page 330 of 762 215112014 Page 331 of 762 215112014 Page 332 of 762 215112014 Page 333 of 762 215112014 Page 334 of 762 215112014 Page 335 of 762 215112014 Page 336 of 762 215112014 Page 337 of 762 215112014 Page 338 of 762 215112014 Page 339 of 762 215112014 Page 340 of 762 215112014 Page 341 of 762 215112014 Page 342 of 762 215112014 Page 343 of 762 215112014 Page 344 of 762 215112014 Page 345 of 762 215112014 Page 346 of 762 215112014 Page 347 of 762 215112014 Page 348 of 762 215112014 Page 349 of 762 215112014 Page 350 of 762 215112014 Page 351 of 762 215112014 Page 352 of 762 215112014 Page 353 of 762 215112014 Page 354 of 762 215112014 Page 355 of 762 215112014 Page 356 of 762 215112014 Page 357 of 762 215112014 Page 358 of 762 215112014 Page 359 of 762 215112014 Page 360 of 762 215112014 Page 361 of 762 215112014 Page 362 of 762 215112014 Page 363 of 762 215112014 Page 364 of 762 215112014 Page 365 of 762 215112014 Page 366 of 762 215112014 Page 367 of 762 215112014 Page 368 of 762 215112014 Page 369 of 762 215112014 Page 370 of 762 215112014 Page 371 of 762 215112014 Page 372 of 762 215112014 Page 373 of 762 215112014 Page 374 of 762 215112014 Page 375 of 762 215112014 Page 376 of 762 215112014 Page 377 of 762 215112014 Page 378 of 762 215112014 Page 379 of 762 215112014 Page 380 of 762 215112014 Page 381 of 762 215112014 Page 382 of 762 215112014 Page 383 of 762 215112014 Page 384 of 762 215112014 Page 385 of 762 215112014 Page 386 of 762 215112014 Page 387 of 762 215112014 Page 388 of 762 215112014 Page 389 of 762 215112014 Page 390 of 762 215112014 Page 391 of 762 215112014 Page 392 of 762 215112014 Page 393 of 762 215112014 Page 394 of 762 215112014 Page 395 of 762 215112014 Page 396 of 762 215112014 Page 397 of 762 215112014 Page 398 of 762 215112014 Page 399 of 762 215112014 Page 400 of 762 215112014 Page 401 of 762 215112014 Page 402 of 762 215112014 Page 403 of 762 215112014 Page 404 of 762 215112014 Page 405 of 762 215112014 Page 406 of 762 215112014 Page 407 of 762 215112014 Page 408 of 762 215112014 Page 409 of 762 215112014 Page 410 of 762 215112014 Page 411 of 762 215112014 Page 412 of 762 215112014 Page 413 of 762 215112014 Page 414 of 762 215112014 Page 415 of 762 215112014 Page 416 of 762 215112014 Page 417 of 762 215112014 Page 418 of 762 215112014 Page 419 of 762 215112014 Page 420 of 762 215112014 Page 421 of 762 215112014 Page 422 of 762 215112014 Page 423 of 762 215112014 Page 424 of 762 215112014 Page 425 of 762 215112014 Page 426 of 762 215112014 Page 427 of 762 215112014 Page 428 of 762 215112014 Page 429 of 762 215112014 Page 430 of 762 215112014 Page 431 of 762 215112014 Page 432 of 762 215112014 Page 433 of 762 215112014 Page 434 of 762 215112014 Page 435 of 762 215112014 Page 436 of 762 215112014 Page 437 of 762 215112014 Page 438 of 762 215112014 Page 439 of 762 215112014 Page 440 of 762 215112014 Page 441 of 762 215112014 Page 442 of 762 215112014 Page 443 of 762 215112014 Page 444 of 762 215112014 Page 445 of 762 215112014 Page 446 of 762 215112014 Page 447 of 762 215112014 Page 448 of 762 215112014 Page 449 of 762 215112014 Page 450 of 762 215112014 Page 451 of 762 215112014 Page 452 of 762 215112014 Page 453 of 762 215112014 Page 454 of 762 215112014 Page 455 of 762 215112014 Page 456 of 762 215112014 Page 457 of 762 215112014 Page 458 of 762 215112014 Page 459 of 762 215112014 Page 460 of 762 215112014 Page 461 of 762 215112014 Page 462 of 762 215112014 Page 463 of 762 215112014 Page 464 of 762 215112014 Page 465 of 762 215112014 Page 466 of 762 215112014 Page 467 of 762 215112014 Page 468 of 762 215112014 Page 469 of 762 215112014 Page 470 of 762 215112014 Page 471 of 762 215112014 Page 472 of 762 215112014 Page 473 of 762 215112014 Page 474 of 762 215112014 Page 475 of 762 215112014 Page 476 of 762 215112014 Page 477 of 762 215112014 Page 478 of 762 215112014 Page 479 of 762 215112014 Page 480 of 762 215112014 Page 481 of 762 215112014 Page 482 of 762 215112014 Page 483 of 762 215112014 Page 484 of 762 215112014 Page 485 of 762 215112014 Page 486 of 762 215112014 Page 487 of 762 215112014 Page 488 of 762 215112014 Page 489 of 762 215112014 Page 490 of 762 215112014 Page 491 of 762 215112014 Page 492 of 762 215112014 Page 493 of 762 215112014 Page 494 of 762 215112014 Page 495 of 762 215112014 Page 496 of 762 215112014 Page 497 of 762 215112014 Page 498 of 762 215112014 Page 499 of 762 215112014 Page 500 of 762 215112014 Page 501 of 762 215112014 Page 502 of 762 215112014 Page 503 of 762 215112014 Page 504 of 762 215112014 Page 505 of 762 215112014 Page 506 of 762 215112014 Page 507 of 762 215112014 Page 508 of 762 215112014 Page 509 of 762 215112014 Page 510 of 762 215112014 Page 511 of 762 215112014 Page 512 of 762 215112014 Page 513 of 762 215112014 Page 514 of 762 215112014 Page 515 of 762 215112014 Page 516 of 762 215112014 Page 517 of 762 215112014 Page 518 of 762 215112014 Page 519 of 762 215112014 Page 520 of 762 215112014 Page 521 of 762 215112014 Page 522 of 762 215112014 Page 523 of 762 215112014 Page 524 of 762 215112014 Page 525 of 762 215112014 Page 526 of 762 215112014 Page 527 of 762 215112014 Page 528 of 762 215112014 Page 529 of 762 215112014 Page 530 of 762 215112014 Page 531 of 762 215112014 Page 532 of 762 215112014 Page 533 of 762 215112014 Page 534 of 762 215112014 Page 535 of 762 215112014 Page 536 of 762 215112014 Page 537 of 762 215112014 Page 538 of 762 215112014 Page 539 of 762 215112014 Page 540 of 762 215112014 Page 541 of 762 215112014 Page 542 of 762 215112014 Page 543 of 762 215112014 Page 544 of 762 215112014 Page 545 of 762 215112014 Page 546 of 762 215112014 Page 547 of 762 215112014 Page 548 of 762 215112014 Page 549 of 762 215112014 Page 550 of 762 215112014 Page 551 of 762 215112014 Page 552 of 762 215112014 Page 553 of 762 215112014 Page 554 of 762 215112014 Page 555 of 762 215112014 Page 556 of 762 215112014 Page 557 of 762 215112014 Page 558 of 762 215112014 Page 559 of 762 215112014 Page 560 of 762 215112014 Page 561 of 762 215112014 Page 562 of 762 215112014 Page 563 of 762 215112014 Page 564 of 762 215112014 Page 565 of 762 215112014 Page 566 of 762 215112014 Page 567 of 762 215112014 Page 568 of 762 215112014 Page 569 of 762 215112014 Page 570 of 762 215112014 Page 571 of 762 215112014 Page 572 of 762 215112014 Page 573 of 762 215112014 Page 574 of 762 215112014 Page 575 of 762 215112014 Page 576 of 762 215112014 Page 577 of 762 215112014 Page 578 of 762 215112014 Page 579 of 762 215112014 Page 580 of 762 215112014 Page 581 of 762 215112014 Page 582 of 762 215112014 Page 583 of 762 215112014 Page 584 of 762 215112014 Page 585 of 762 215112014 Page 586 of 762 215112014 Page 587 of 762 215112014 Page 588 of 762 215112014 Page 589 of 762 215112014 Page 590 of 762 215112014 Page 591 of 762 215112014 Page 592 of 762 215112014 Page 593 of 762 215112014 Page 594 of 762 215112014 Page 595 of 762 215112014 Page 596 of 762 215112014 Page 597 of 762 215112014 Page 598 of 762 215112014 Page 599 of 762 215112014 Page 600 of 762 215112014 Page 601 of 762 215112014 Page 602 of 762 215112014 Page 603 of 762 215112014 Page 604 of 762 215112014 Page 605 of 762 215112014 Page 606 of 762 215112014 Page 607 of 762 215112014 Page 608 of 762 215112014 Page 609 of 762 215112014 Page 610 of 762 215112014 Page 611 of 762 215112014 Page 612 of 762 215112014 Page 613 of 762 215112014 Page 614 of 762 215112014 Page 615 of 762 215112014 Page 616 of 762 215112014 Page 617 of 762 215112014 Page 618 of 762 215112014 Page 619 of 762 215112014 Page 620 of 762 215112014 Page 621 of 762 215112014 Page 622 of 762 215112014 Page 623 of 762 215112014 Page 624 of 762 215112014 Page 625 of 762 215112014 Page 626 of 762 215112014 Page 627 of 762 215112014 Page 628 of 762 215112014 Page 629 of 762 215112014 Page 630 of 762 215112014 Page 631 of 762 215112014 Page 632 of 762 215112014 Page 633 of 762 215112014 Page 634 of 762 215112014 Page 635 of 762 215112014 Page 636 of 762 215112014 Page 637 of 762 215112014 Page 638 of 762 215112014 Page 639 of 762 215112014 Page 640 of 762 215112014 Page 641 of 762 215112014 Page 642 of 762 215112014 Page 643 of 762 215112014 Page 644 of 762 215112014 Page 645 of 762 215112014 Page 646 of 762 215112014 Page 647 of 762 215112014 Page 648 of 762 215112014 Page 649 of 762 215112014 Page 650 of 762 215112014 Page 651 of 762 215112014 Page 652 of 762 215112014 Page 653 of 762 215112014 Page 654 of 762 215112014 Page 655 of 762 215112014 Page 656 of 762 215112014 Page 657 of 762 215112014 Page 658 of 762 215112014 Page 659 of 762 215112014 Page 660 of 762 215112014 Page 661 of 762 215112014 Page 662 of 762 215112014 Page 663 of 762 215112014 Page 664 of 762 215112014 Page 665 of 762 215112014 Page 666 of 762 215112014 Page 667 of 762 215112014 Page 668 of 762 215112014 Page 669 of 762 215112014 Page 670 of 762 215112014 Page 671 of 762 215112014 Page 672 of 762 215112014 Page 673 of 762 215112014 Page 674 of 762 215112014 Page 675 of 762 215112014 Page 676 of 762 215112014 Page 677 of 762 215112014 Page 678 of 762 215112014 Page 679 of 762 215112014 Page 680 of 762 215112014 Page 681 of 762 215112014 Page 682 of 762 215112014 Page 683 of 762 215112014 Page 684 of 762 215112014 Page 685 of 762 215112014 Page 686 of 762 215112014 Page 687 of 762 215112014 Page 688 of 762 215112014 Page 689 of 762 215112014 Page 690 of 762 215112014 Page 691 of 762 215112014 Page 692 of 762 215112014 Page 693 of 762 215112014 Page 694 of 762 215112014 Page 695 of 762 215112014 Page 696 of 762 215112014 Page 697 of 762 215112014 Page 698 of 762 215112014 Page 699 of 762 215112014 Page 700 of 762 215112014 Page 701 of 762 215112014 Page 702 of 762 215112014 Page 703 of 762 215112014 Page 704 of 762 215112014 Page 705 of 762 215112014 Page 706 of 762 215112014 Page 707 of 762 215112014 Page 708 of 762 215112014 Page 709 of 762 215112014 Page 710 of 762 215112014 Page 711 of 762 215112014 Page 712 of 762 215112014 Page 713 of 762 215112014 Page 714 of 762 215112014 Page 715 of 762 215112014 Page 716 of 762 215112014 Page 717 of 762 215112014 Page 718 of 762 215112014 Page 719 of 762 215112014 Page 720 of 762 215112014 Page 721 of 762 215112014 Page 722 of 762 215112014 Page 723 of 762 215112014 Page 724 of 762 215112014 Page 725 of 762 215112014 Page 726 of 762 215112014 Page 727 of 762 215112014 Page 728 of 762 215112014 Page 729 of 762 215112014 Page 730 of 762 215112014 Page 731 of 762 215112014 Page 732 of 762 215112014 Page 733 of 762 215112014 Page 734 of 762 215112014 Page 735 of 762 215112014 Page 736 of 762 215112014 Page 737 of 762 215112014 Page 738 of 762 215112014 Page 739 of 762 215112014 Page 740 of 762 215112014 Page 741 of 762 215112014 Page 742 of 762 215112014 Page 743 of 762 215112014 Page 744 of 762 215112014 Page 745 of 762 215112014 Page 746 of 762 215112014 Page 747 of 762 215112014 Page 748 of 762 215112014 Page 749 of 762 215112014 Page 750 of 762 215112014 Page 751 of 762 215112014 Page 752 of 762 215112014 Page 753 of 762 215112014 Page 754 of 762 215112014 Page 755 of 762 215112014 Page 756 of 762 215112014 Page 757 of 762 215112014 Page 758 of 762 215112014 Page 759 of 762 215112014 Page 760 of 762 215112014 Page 761 of 762 215112014 Page 762 of 762 215112018 Page 1 of 1509 215112018 Page 2 of 1509 215112018 Page 3 of 1509 215112018 Page 4 of 1509 215112018 Page 5 of 1509 215112018 Page 6 of 1509 215112018 Page 7 of 1509 215112018 Page 8 of 1509 215112018 Page 9 of 1509 215112018 Page 10 of 1509 215112018 Page 11 of 1509 215112018 Page 12 of 1509 215112018 Page 13 of 1509 215112018 Page 14 of 1509 215112018 Page 15 of 1509 215112018 Page 16 of 1509 215112018 Page 17 of 1509 215112018 Page 18 of 1509 215112018 Page 19 of 1509 215112018 Page 20 of 1509 215112018 Page 21 of 1509 215112018 Page 22 of 1509 215112018 Page 23 of 1509 215112018 Page 24 of 1509 215112018 Page 25 of 1509 215112018 Page 26 of 1509 215112018 Page 27 of 1509 215112018 Page 28 of 1509 215112018 Page 29 of 1509 215112018 Page 30 of 1509 215112018 Page 31 of 1509 215112018 Page 32 of 1509 215112018 Page 33 of 1509 215112018 Page 34 of 1509 215112018 Page 35 of 1509 215112018 Page 36 of 1509 215112018 Page 37 of 1509 215112018 Page 38 of 1509 215112018 Page 39 of 1509 215112018 Page 40 of 1509 215112018 Page 41 of 1509 215112018 Page 42 of 1509 215112018 Page 43 of 1509 215112018 Page 44 of 1509 215112018 Page 45 of 1509 215112018 Page 46 of 1509 215112018 Page 47 of 1509 215112018 Page 48 of 1509 215112018 Page 49 of 1509 215112018 Page 50 of 1509 215112018 Page 51 of 1509 215112018 Page 52 of 1509 215112018 Page 53 of 1509 215112018 Page 54 of 1509 215112018 Page 55 of 1509 215112018 Page 56 of 1509 215112018 Page 57 of 1509 215112018 Page 58 of 1509 215112018 Page 59 of 1509 215112018 Page 60 of 1509 215112018 Page 61 of 1509 215112018 Page 62 of 1509 215112018 Page 63 of 1509 215112018 Page 64 of 1509 215112018 Page 65 of 1509 215112018 Page 66 of 1509 215112018 Page 67 of 1509 215112018 Page 68 of 1509 215112018 Page 69 of 1509 215112018 Page 70 of 1509 215112018 Page 71 of 1509 215112018 Page 72 of 1509 215112018 Page 73 of 1509 215112018 Page 74 of 1509 215112018 Page 75 of 1509 215112018 Page 76 of 1509 215112018 Page 77 of 1509 215112018 Page 78 of 1509 215112018 Page 79 of 1509 215112018 Page 80 of 1509 215112018 Page 81 of 1509 215112018 Page 82 of 1509 215112018 Page 83 of 1509 215112018 Page 84 of 1509 215112018 Page 85 of 1509 215112018 Page 86 of 1509 215112018 Page 87 of 1509 215112018 Page 88 of 1509 215112018 Page 89 of 1509 215112018 Page 90 of 1509 215112018 Page 91 of 1509 215112018 Page 92 of 1509 215112018 Page 93 of 1509 215112018 Page 94 of 1509 215112018 Page 95 of 1509 215112018 Page 96 of 1509 215112018 Page 97 of 1509 215112018 Page 98 of 1509 215112018 Page 99 of 1509 215112018 Page 100 of 1509 215112018 Page 101 of 1509 215112018 Page 102 of 1509 215112018 Page 103 of 1509 215112018 Page 104 of 1509 215112018 Page 105 of 1509 215112018 Page 106 of 1509 215112018 Page 107 of 1509 215112018 Page 108 of 1509 215112018 Page 109 of 1509 215112018 Page 110 of 1509 215112018 Page 111 of 1509 215112018 Page 112 of 1509 215112018 Page 113 of 1509 215112018 Page 114 of 1509 215112018 Page 115 of 1509 215112018 Page 116 of 1509 215112018 Page 117 of 1509 215112018 Page 118 of 1509 215112018 Page 119 of 1509 215112018 Page 120 of 1509 215112018 Page 121 of 1509 215112018 Page 122 of 1509 215112018 Page 123 of 1509 215112018 Page 124 of 1509 215112018 Page 125 of 1509 215112018 Page 126 of 1509 215112018 Page 127 of 1509 215112018 Page 128 of 1509 215112018 Page 129 of 1509 215112018 Page 130 of 1509 215112018 Page 131 of 1509 215112018 Page 132 of 1509 215112018 Page 133 of 1509 215112018 Page 134 of 1509 215112018 Page 135 of 1509 215112018 Page 136 of 1509 215112018 Page 137 of 1509 215112018 Page 138 of 1509 215112018 Page 139 of 1509 215112018 Page 140 of 1509 215112018 Page 141 of 1509 215112018 Page 142 of 1509 215112018 Page 143 of 1509 215112018 Page 144 of 1509 215112018 Page 145 of 1509 215112018 Page 146 of 1509 215112018 Page 147 of 1509 215112018 Page 148 of 1509 215112018 Page 149 of 1509 215112018 Page 150 of 1509 215112018 Page 151 of 1509 215112018 Page 152 of 1509 215112018 Page 153 of 1509 215112018 Page 154 of 1509 215112018 Page 155 of 1509 215112018 Page 156 of 1509 215112018 Page 157 of 1509 215112018 Page 158 of 1509 215112018 Page 159 of 1509 215112018 Page 160 of 1509 215112018 Page 161 of 1509 215112018 Page 162 of 1509 215112018 Page 163 of 1509 215112018 Page 164 of 1509 215112018 Page 165 of 1509 215112018 Page 166 of 1509 215112018 Page 167 of 1509 215112018 Page 168 of 1509 215112018 Page 169 of 1509 215112018 Page 170 of 1509 215112018 Page 171 of 1509 215112018 Page 172 of 1509 215112018 Page 173 of 1509 215112018 Page 174 of 1509 215112018 Page 175 of 1509 215112018 Page 176 of 1509 215112018 Page 177 of 1509 215112018 Page 178 of 1509 215112018 Page 179 of 1509 215112018 Page 180 of 1509 215112018 Page 181 of 1509 215112018 Page 182 of 1509 215112018 Page 183 of 1509 215112018 Page 184 of 1509 215112018 Page 185 of 1509 215112018 Page 186 of 1509 215112018 Page 187 of 1509 215112018 Page 188 of 1509 215112018 Page 189 of 1509 215112018 Page 190 of 1509 215112018 Page 191 of 1509 215112018 Page 192 of 1509 215112018 Page 193 of 1509 215112018 Page 194 of 1509 215112018 Page 195 of 1509 215112018 Page 196 of 1509 215112018 Page 197 of 1509 215112018 Page 198 of 1509 215112018 Page 199 of 1509 215112018 Page 200 of 1509 215112018 Page 201 of 1509 215112018 Page 202 of 1509 215112018 Page 203 of 1509 215112018 Page 204 of 1509 215112018 Page 205 of 1509 215112018 Page 206 of 1509 215112018 Page 207 of 1509 215112018 Page 208 of 1509 215112018 Page 209 of 1509 215112018 Page 210 of 1509 215112018 Page 211 of 1509 215112018 Page 212 of 1509 215112018 Page 213 of 1509 215112018 Page 214 of 1509 215112018 Page 215 of 1509 215112018 Page 216 of 1509 215112018 Page 217 of 1509 215112018 Page 218 of 1509 215112018 Page 219 of 1509 215112018 Page 220 of 1509 215112018 Page 221 of 1509 215112018 Page 222 of 1509 215112018 Page 223 of 1509 215112018 Page 224 of 1509 215112018 Page 225 of 1509 215112018 Page 226 of 1509 215112018 Page 227 of 1509 215112018 Page 228 of 1509 215112018 Page 229 of 1509 215112018 Page 230 of 1509 215112018 Page 231 of 1509 215112018 Page 232 of 1509 215112018 Page 233 of 1509 215112018 Page 234 of 1509 215112018 Page 235 of 1509 215112018 Page 236 of 1509 215112018 Page 237 of 1509 215112018 Page 238 of 1509 215112018 Page 239 of 1509 215112018 Page 240 of 1509 215112018 Page 241 of 1509 215112018 Page 242 of 1509 215112018 Page 243 of 1509 215112018 Page 244 of 1509 215112018 Page 245 of 1509 215112018 Page 246 of 1509 215112018 Page 247 of 1509 215112018 Page 248 of 1509 215112018 Page 249 of 1509 215112018 Page 250 of 1509 215112018 Page 251 of 1509 215112018 Page 252 of 1509 215112018 Page 253 of 1509 215112018 Page 254 of 1509 215112018 Page 255 of 1509 215112018 Page 256 of 1509 215112018 Page 257 of 1509 215112018 Page 258 of 1509 215112018 Page 259 of 1509 215112018 Page 260 of 1509 215112018 Page 261 of 1509 215112018 Page 262 of 1509 215112018 Page 263 of 1509 215112018 Page 264 of 1509 215112018 Page 265 of 1509 215112018 Page 266 of 1509 215112018 Page 267 of 1509 215112018 Page 268 of 1509 215112018 Page 269 of 1509 215112018 Page 270 of 1509 215112018 Page 271 of 1509 215112018 Page 272 of 1509 215112018 Page 273 of 1509 215112018 Page 274 of 1509 215112018 Page 275 of 1509 215112018 Page 276 of 1509 215112018 Page 277 of 1509 215112018 Page 278 of 1509 215112018 Page 279 of 1509 215112018 Page 280 of 1509 215112018 Page 281 of 1509 215112018 Page 282 of 1509 215112018 Page 283 of 1509 215112018 Page 284 of 1509 215112018 Page 285 of 1509 215112018 Page 286 of 1509 215112018 Page 287 of 1509 215112018 Page 288 of 1509 215112018 Page 289 of 1509 215112018 Page 290 of 1509 215112018 Page 291 of 1509 215112018 Page 292 of 1509 215112018 Page 293 of 1509 215112018 Page 294 of 1509 215112018 Page 295 of 1509 215112018 Page 296 of 1509 215112018 Page 297 of 1509 215112018 Page 298 of 1509 215112018 Page 299 of 1509 215112018 Page 300 of 1509 215112018 Page 301 of 1509 215112018 Page 302 of 1509 215112018 Page 303 of 1509 215112018 Page 304 of 1509 215112018 Page 305 of 1509 215112018 Page 306 of 1509 215112018 Page 307 of 1509 215112018 Page 308 of 1509 215112018 Page 309 of 1509 215112018 Page 310 of 1509 215112018 Page 311 of 1509 215112018 Page 312 of 1509 215112018 Page 313 of 1509 215112018 Page 314 of 1509 215112018 Page 315 of 1509 215112018 Page 316 of 1509 215112018 Page 317 of 1509 215112018 Page 318 of 1509 215112018 Page 319 of 1509 215112018 Page 320 of 1509 215112018 Page 321 of 1509 215112018 Page 322 of 1509 215112018 Page 323 of 1509 215112018 Page 324 of 1509 215112018 Page 325 of 1509 215112018 Page 326 of 1509 215112018 Page 327 of 1509 215112018 Page 328 of 1509 215112018 Page 329 of 1509 215112018 Page 330 of 1509 215112018 Page 331 of 1509 215112018 Page 332 of 1509 215112018 Page 333 of 1509 215112018 Page 334 of 1509 215112018 Page 335 of 1509 215112018 Page 336 of 1509 215112018 Page 337 of 1509 215112018 Page 338 of 1509 215112018 Page 339 of 1509 215112018 Page 340 of 1509 215112018 Page 341 of 1509 215112018 Page 342 of 1509 215112018 Page 343 of 1509 215112018 Page 344 of 1509 215112018 Page 345 of 1509 215112018 Page 346 of 1509 215112018 Page 347 of 1509 215112018 Page 348 of 1509 215112018 Page 349 of 1509 215112018 Page 350 of 1509 215112018 Page 351 of 1509 215112018 Page 352 of 1509 215112018 Page 353 of 1509 215112018 Page 354 of 1509 215112018 Page 355 of 1509 215112018 Page 356 of 1509 215112018 Page 357 of 1509 215112018 Page 358 of 1509 215112018 Page 359 of 1509 215112018 Page 360 of 1509 215112018 Page 361 of 1509 215112018 Page 362 of 1509 215112018 Page 363 of 1509 215112018 Page 364 of 1509 215112018 Page 365 of 1509 215112018 Page 366 of 1509 215112018 Page 367 of 1509 215112018 Page 368 of 1509 215112018 Page 369 of 1509 215112018 Page 370 of 1509 215112018 Page 371 of 1509 215112018 Page 372 of 1509 215112018 Page 373 of 1509 215112018 Page 374 of 1509 215112018 Page 375 of 1509 215112018 Page 376 of 1509 215112018 Page 377 of 1509 215112018 Page 378 of 1509 215112018 Page 379 of 1509 215112018 Page 380 of 1509 215112018 Page 381 of 1509 215112018 Page 382 of 1509 215112018 Page 383 of 1509 215112018 Page 384 of 1509 215112018 Page 385 of 1509 215112018 Page 386 of 1509 215112018 Page 387 of 1509 215112018 Page 388 of 1509 215112018 Page 389 of 1509 215112018 Page 390 of 1509 215112018 Page 391 of 1509 215112018 Page 392 of 1509 215112018 Page 393 of 1509 215112018 Page 394 of 1509 215112018 Page 395 of 1509 215112018 Page 396 of 1509 215112018 Page 397 of 1509 215112018 Page 398 of 1509 215112018 Page 399 of 1509 215112018 Page 400 of 1509 215112018 Page 401 of 1509 215112018 Page 402 of 1509 215112018 Page 403 of 1509 215112018 Page 404 of 1509 215112018 Page 405 of 1509 215112018 Page 406 of 1509 215112018 Page 407 of 1509 215112018 Page 408 of 1509 215112018 Page 409 of 1509 215112018 Page 410 of 1509 215112018 Page 411 of 1509 215112018 Page 412 of 1509 215112018 Page 413 of 1509 215112018 Page 414 of 1509 215112018 Page 415 of 1509 215112018 Page 416 of 1509 215112018 Page 417 of 1509 215112018 Page 418 of 1509 215112018 Page 419 of 1509 215112018 Page 420 of 1509 215112018 Page 421 of 1509 215112018 Page 422 of 1509 215112018 Page 423 of 1509 215112018 Page 424 of 1509 215112018 Page 425 of 1509 215112018 Page 426 of 1509 215112018 Page 427 of 1509 215112018 Page 428 of 1509 215112018 Page 429 of 1509 215112018 Page 430 of 1509 215112018 Page 431 of 1509 215112018 Page 432 of 1509 215112018 Page 433 of 1509 215112018 Page 434 of 1509 215112018 Page 435 of 1509 215112018 Page 436 of 1509 215112018 Page 437 of 1509 215112018 Page 438 of 1509 215112018 Page 439 of 1509 215112018 Page 440 of 1509 215112018 Page 441 of 1509 215112018 Page 442 of 1509 215112018 Page 443 of 1509 215112018 Page 444 of 1509 215112018 Page 445 of 1509 215112018 Page 446 of 1509 215112018 Page 447 of 1509 215112018 Page 448 of 1509 215112018 Page 449 of 1509 215112018 Page 450 of 1509 215112018 Page 451 of 1509 215112018 Page 452 of 1509 215112018 Page 453 of 1509 215112018 Page 454 of 1509 215112018 Page 455 of 1509 215112018 Page 456 of 1509 215112018 Page 457 of 1509 215112018 Page 458 of 1509 215112018 Page 459 of 1509 215112018 Page 460 of 1509 215112018 Page 461 of 1509 215112018 Page 462 of 1509 215112018 Page 463 of 1509 215112018 Page 464 of 1509 215112018 Page 465 of 1509 215112018 Page 466 of 1509 215112018 Page 467 of 1509 215112018 Page 468 of 1509 215112018 Page 469 of 1509 215112018 Page 470 of 1509 215112018 Page 471 of 1509 215112018 Page 472 of 1509 215112018 Page 473 of 1509 215112018 Page 474 of 1509 215112018 Page 475 of 1509 215112018 Page 476 of 1509 215112018 Page 477 of 1509 215112018 Page 478 of 1509 215112018 Page 479 of 1509 215112018 Page 480 of 1509 215112018 Page 481 of 1509 215112018 Page 482 of 1509 215112018 Page 483 of 1509 215112018 Page 484 of 1509 215112018 Page 485 of 1509 215112018 Page 486 of 1509 215112018 Page 487 of 1509 215112018 Page 488 of 1509 215112018 Page 489 of 1509 215112018 Page 490 of 1509 215112018 Page 491 of 1509 215112018 Page 492 of 1509 215112018 Page 493 of 1509 215112018 Page 494 of 1509 215112018 Page 495 of 1509 215112018 Page 496 of 1509 215112018 Page 497 of 1509 215112018 Page 498 of 1509 215112018 Page 499 of 1509 215112018 Page 500 of 1509 215112018 Page 501 of 1509 215112018 Page 502 of 1509 215112018 Page 503 of 1509 215112018 Page 504 of 1509 215112018 Page 505 of 1509 215112018 Page 506 of 1509 215112018 Page 507 of 1509 215112018 Page 508 of 1509 215112018 Page 509 of 1509 215112018 Page 510 of 1509 215112018 Page 511 of 1509 215112018 Page 512 of 1509 215112018 Page 513 of 1509 215112018 Page 514 of 1509 215112018 Page 515 of 1509 215112018 Page 516 of 1509 215112018 Page 517 of 1509 215112018 Page 518 of 1509 215112018 Page 519 of 1509 215112018 Page 520 of 1509 215112018 Page 521 of 1509 215112018 Page 522 of 1509 215112018 Page 523 of 1509 215112018 Page 524 of 1509 215112018 Page 525 of 1509 215112018 Page 526 of 1509 215112018 Page 527 of 1509 215112018 Page 528 of 1509 215112018 Page 529 of 1509 215112018 Page 530 of 1509 215112018 Page 531 of 1509 215112018 Page 532 of 1509 215112018 Page 533 of 1509 215112018 Page 534 of 1509 215112018 Page 535 of 1509 215112018 Page 536 of 1509 215112018 Page 537 of 1509 215112018 Page 538 of 1509 215112018 Page 539 of 1509 215112018 Page 540 of 1509 215112018 Page 541 of 1509 215112018 Page 542 of 1509 215112018 Page 543 of 1509 215112018 Page 544 of 1509 215112018 Page 545 of 1509 215112018 Page 546 of 1509 215112018 Page 547 of 1509 215112018 Page 548 of 1509 215112018 Page 549 of 1509 215112018 Page 550 of 1509 215112018 Page 551 of 1509 215112018 Page 552 of 1509 215112018 Page 553 of 1509 215112018 Page 554 of 1509 215112018 Page 555 of 1509 215112018 Page 556 of 1509 215112018 Page 557 of 1509 215112018 Page 558 of 1509 215112018 Page 559 of 1509 215112018 Page 560 of 1509 215112018 Page 561 of 1509 215112018 Page 562 of 1509 215112018 Page 563 of 1509 215112018 Page 564 of 1509 215112018 Page 565 of 1509 215112018 Page 566 of 1509 215112018 Page 567 of 1509 215112018 Page 568 of 1509 215112018 Page 569 of 1509 215112018 Page 570 of 1509 215112018 Page 571 of 1509 215112018 Page 572 of 1509 215112018 Page 573 of 1509 215112018 Page 574 of 1509 215112018 Page 575 of 1509 215112018 Page 576 of 1509 215112018 Page 577 of 1509 215112018 Page 578 of 1509 215112018 Page 579 of 1509 215112018 Page 580 of 1509 215112018 Page 581 of 1509 215112018 Page 582 of 1509 215112018 Page 583 of 1509 215112018 Page 584 of 1509 215112018 Page 585 of 1509 215112018 Page 586 of 1509 215112018 Page 587 of 1509 215112018 Page 588 of 1509 215112018 Page 589 of 1509 215112018 Page 590 of 1509 215112018 Page 591 of 1509 215112018 Page 592 of 1509 215112018 Page 593 of 1509 215112018 Page 594 of 1509 215112018 Page 595 of 1509 215112018 Page 596 of 1509 215112018 Page 597 of 1509 215112018 Page 598 of 1509 215112018 Page 599 of 1509 215112018 Page 600 of 1509 215112018 Page 601 of 1509 215112018 Page 602 of 1509 215112018 Page 603 of 1509 215112018 Page 604 of 1509 215112018 Page 605 of 1509 215112018 Page 606 of 1509 215112018 Page 607 of 1509 215112018 Page 608 of 1509 215112018 Page 609 of 1509 215112018 Page 610 of 1509 215112018 Page 611 of 1509 215112018 Page 612 of 1509 215112018 Page 613 of 1509 215112018 Page 614 of 1509 215112018 Page 615 of 1509 215112018 Page 616 of 1509 215112018 Page 617 of 1509 215112018 Page 618 of 1509 215112018 Page 619 of 1509 215112018 Page 620 of 1509 215112018 Page 621 of 1509 215112018 Page 622 of 1509 215112018 Page 623 of 1509 215112018 Page 624 of 1509 215112018 Page 625 of 1509 215112018 Page 626 of 1509 215112018 Page 627 of 1509 215112018 Page 628 of 1509 215112018 Page 629 of 1509 215112018 Page 630 of 1509 215112018 Page 631 of 1509 215112018 Page 632 of 1509 215112018 Page 633 of 1509 215112018 Page 634 of 1509 215112018 Page 635 of 1509 215112018 Page 636 of 1509 215112018 Page 637 of 1509 215112018 Page 638 of 1509 215112018 Page 639 of 1509 215112018 Page 640 of 1509 215112018 Page 641 of 1509 215112018 Page 642 of 1509 215112018 Page 643 of 1509 215112018 Page 644 of 1509 215112018 Page 645 of 1509 215112018 Page 646 of 1509 215112018 Page 647 of 1509 215112018 Page 648 of 1509 215112018 Page 649 of 1509 215112018 Page 650 of 1509 215112018 Page 651 of 1509 215112018 Page 652 of 1509 215112018 Page 653 of 1509 215112018 Page 654 of 1509 215112018 Page 655 of 1509 215112018 Page 656 of 1509 215112018 Page 657 of 1509 215112018 Page 658 of 1509 215112018 Page 659 of 1509 215112018 Page 660 of 1509 215112018 Page 661 of 1509 215112018 Page 662 of 1509 215112018 Page 663 of 1509 215112018 Page 664 of 1509 215112018 Page 665 of 1509 215112018 Page 666 of 1509 215112018 Page 667 of 1509 215112018 Page 668 of 1509 215112018 Page 669 of 1509 215112018 Page 670 of 1509 215112018 Page 671 of 1509 215112018 Page 672 of 1509 215112018 Page 673 of 1509 215112018 Page 674 of 1509 215112018 Page 675 of 1509 215112018 Page 676 of 1509 215112018 Page 677 of 1509 215112018 Page 678 of 1509 215112018 Page 679 of 1509 215112018 Page 680 of 1509 215112018 Page 681 of 1509 215112018 Page 682 of 1509 215112018 Page 683 of 1509 215112018 Page 684 of 1509 215112018 Page 685 of 1509 215112018 Page 686 of 1509 215112018 Page 687 of 1509 215112018 Page 688 of 1509 215112018 Page 689 of 1509 215112018 Page 690 of 1509 215112018 Page 691 of 1509 215112018 Page 692 of 1509 215112018 Page 693 of 1509 215112018 Page 694 of 1509 215112018 Page 695 of 1509 215112018 Page 696 of 1509 215112018 Page 697 of 1509 215112018 Page 698 of 1509 215112018 Page 699 of 1509 215112018 Page 700 of 1509 215112018 Page 701 of 1509 215112018 Page 702 of 1509 215112018 Page 703 of 1509 215112018 Page 704 of 1509 215112018 Page 705 of 1509 215112018 Page 706 of 1509 215112018 Page 707 of 1509 215112018 Page 708 of 1509 215112018 Page 709 of 1509 215112018 Page 710 of 1509 215112018 Page 711 of 1509 215112018 Page 712 of 1509 215112018 Page 713 of 1509 215112018 Page 714 of 1509 215112018 Page 715 of 1509 215112018 Page 716 of 1509 215112018 Page 717 of 1509 215112018 Page 718 of 1509 215112018 Page 719 of 1509 215112018 Page 720 of 1509 215112018 Page 721 of 1509 215112018 Page 722 of 1509 215112018 Page 723 of 1509 215112018 Page 724 of 1509 215112018 Page 725 of 1509 215112018 Page 726 of 1509 215112018 Page 727 of 1509 215112018 Page 728 of 1509 215112018 Page 729 of 1509 215112018 Page 730 of 1509 215112018 Page 731 of 1509 215112018 Page 732 of 1509 215112018 Page 733 of 1509 215112018 Page 734 of 1509 215112018 Page 735 of 1509 215112018 Page 736 of 1509 215112018 Page 737 of 1509 215112018 Page 738 of 1509 215112018 Page 739 of 1509 215112018 Page 740 of 1509 215112018 Page 741 of 1509 215112018 Page 742 of 1509 215112018 Page 743 of 1509 215112018 Page 744 of 1509 215112018 Page 745 of 1509 215112018 Page 746 of 1509 215112018 Page 747 of 1509 215112018 Page 748 of 1509 215112018 Page 749 of 1509 215112018 Page 750 of 1509 215112018 Page 751 of 1509 215112018 Page 752 of 1509 215112018 Page 753 of 1509 215112018 Page 754 of 1509 215112018 Page 755 of 1509 215112018 Page 756 of 1509 215112018 Page 757 of 1509 215112018 Page 758 of 1509 215112018 Page 759 of 1509 215112018 Page 760 of 1509 215112018 Page 761 of 1509 215112018 Page 762 of 1509 215112018 Page 763 of 1509 215112018 Page 764 of 1509 215112018 Page 765 of 1509 215112018 Page 766 of 1509 215112018 Page 767 of 1509 215112018 Page 768 of 1509 215112018 Page 769 of 1509 215112018 Page 770 of 1509 215112018 Page 771 of 1509 215112018 Page 772 of 1509 215112018 Page 773 of 1509 215112018 Page 774 of 1509 215112018 Page 775 of 1509 215112018 Page 776 of 1509 215112018 Page 777 of 1509 215112018 Page 778 of 1509 215112018 Page 779 of 1509 215112018 Page 780 of 1509 215112018 Page 781 of 1509 215112018 Page 782 of 1509 215112018 Page 783 of 1509 215112018 Page 784 of 1509 215112018 Page 785 of 1509 215112018 Page 786 of 1509 215112018 Page 787 of 1509 215112018 Page 788 of 1509 215112018 Page 789 of 1509 215112018 Page 790 of 1509 215112018 Page 791 of 1509 215112018 Page 792 of 1509 215112018 Page 793 of 1509 215112018 Page 794 of 1509 215112018 Page 795 of 1509 215112018 Page 796 of 1509 215112018 Page 797 of 1509 215112018 Page 798 of 1509 215112018 Page 799 of 1509 215112018 Page 800 of 1509 215112018 Page 801 of 1509 215112018 Page 802 of 1509 215112018 Page 803 of 1509 215112018 Page 804 of 1509 215112018 Page 805 of 1509 215112018 Page 806 of 1509 215112018 Page 807 of 1509 215112018 Page 808 of 1509 215112018 Page 809 of 1509 215112018 Page 810 of 1509 215112018 Page 811 of 1509 215112018 Page 812 of 1509 215112018 Page 813 of 1509 215112018 Page 814 of 1509 215112018 Page 815 of 1509 215112018 Page 816 of 1509 215112018 Page 817 of 1509 215112018 Page 818 of 1509 215112018 Page 819 of 1509 215112018 Page 820 of 1509 215112018 Page 821 of 1509 215112018 Page 822 of 1509 215112018 Page 823 of 1509 215112018 Page 824 of 1509 215112018 Page 825 of 1509 215112018 Page 826 of 1509 215112018 Page 827 of 1509 215112018 Page 828 of 1509 215112018 Page 829 of 1509 215112018 Page 830 of 1509 215112018 Page 831 of 1509 215112018 Page 832 of 1509 215112018 Page 833 of 1509 215112018 Page 834 of 1509 215112018 Page 835 of 1509 215112018 Page 836 of 1509 215112018 Page 837 of 1509 215112018 Page 838 of 1509 215112018 Page 839 of 1509 215112018 Page 840 of 1509 215112018 Page 841 of 1509 215112018 Page 842 of 1509 215112018 Page 843 of 1509 215112018 Page 844 of 1509 215112018 Page 845 of 1509 215112018 Page 846 of 1509 215112018 Page 847 of 1509 215112018 Page 848 of 1509 215112018 Page 849 of 1509 215112018 Page 850 of 1509 215112018 Page 851 of 1509 215112018 Page 852 of 1509 215112018 Page 853 of 1509 215112018 Page 854 of 1509 215112018 Page 855 of 1509 215112018 Page 856 of 1509 215112018 Page 857 of 1509 215112018 Page 858 of 1509 215112018 Page 859 of 1509 215112018 Page 860 of 1509 215112018 Page 861 of 1509 215112018 Page 862 of 1509 215112018 Page 863 of 1509 215112018 Page 864 of 1509 215112018 Page 865 of 1509 215112018 Page 866 of 1509 215112018 Page 867 of 1509 215112018 Page 868 of 1509 215112018 Page 869 of 1509 215112018 Page 870 of 1509 215112018 Page 871 of 1509 215112018 Page 872 of 1509 215112018 Page 873 of 1509 215112018 Page 874 of 1509 215112018 Page 875 of 1509 215112018 Page 876 of 1509 215112018 Page 877 of 1509 215112018 Page 878 of 1509 215112018 Page 879 of 1509 215112018 Page 880 of 1509 215112018 Page 881 of 1509 215112018 Page 882 of 1509 215112018 Page 883 of 1509 215112018 Page 884 of 1509 215112018 Page 885 of 1509 215112018 Page 886 of 1509 215112018 Page 887 of 1509 215112018 Page 888 of 1509 215112018 Page 889 of 1509 215112018 Page 890 of 1509 215112018 Page 891 of 1509 215112018 Page 892 of 1509 215112018 Page 893 of 1509 215112018 Page 894 of 1509 215112018 Page 895 of 1509 215112018 Page 896 of 1509 215112018 Page 897 of 1509 215112018 Page 898 of 1509 215112018 Page 899 of 1509 215112018 Page 900 of 1509 215112018 Page 901 of 1509 215112018 Page 902 of 1509 215112018 Page 903 of 1509 215112018 Page 904 of 1509 215112018 Page 905 of 1509 215112018 Page 906 of 1509 215112018 Page 907 of 1509 215112018 Page 908 of 1509 215112018 Page 909 of 1509 215112018 Page 910 of 1509 215112018 Page 911 of 1509 215112018 Page 912 of 1509 215112018 Page 913 of 1509 215112018 Page 914 of 1509 215112018 Page 915 of 1509 215112018 Page 916 of 1509 215112018 Page 917 of 1509 215112018 Page 918 of 1509 215112018 Page 919 of 1509 215112018 Page 920 of 1509 215112018 Page 921 of 1509 215112018 Page 922 of 1509 215112018 Page 923 of 1509 215112018 Page 924 of 1509 215112018 Page 925 of 1509 215112018 Page 926 of 1509 215112018 Page 927 of 1509 215112018 Page 928 of 1509 215112018 Page 929 of 1509 215112018 Page 930 of 1509 215112018 Page 931 of 1509 215112018 Page 932 of 1509 215112018 Page 933 of 1509 215112018 Page 934 of 1509 215112018 Page 935 of 1509 215112018 Page 936 of 1509 215112018 Page 937 of 1509 215112018 Page 938 of 1509 215112018 Page 939 of 1509 215112018 Page 940 of 1509 215112018 Page 941 of 1509 215112018 Page 942 of 1509 215112018 Page 943 of 1509 215112018 Page 944 of 1509 215112018 Page 945 of 1509 215112018 Page 946 of 1509 215112018 Page 947 of 1509 215112018 Page 948 of 1509 215112018 Page 949 of 1509 215112018 Page 950 of 1509 215112018 Page 951 of 1509 215112018 Page 952 of 1509 215112018 Page 953 of 1509 215112018 Page 954 of 1509 215112018 Page 955 of 1509 215112018 Page 956 of 1509 215112018 Page 957 of 1509 215112018 Page 958 of 1509 215112018 Page 959 of 1509 215112018 Page 960 of 1509 215112018 Page 961 of 1509 215112018 Page 962 of 1509 215112018 Page 963 of 1509 215112018 Page 964 of 1509 215112018 Page 965 of 1509 215112018 Page 966 of 1509 215112018 Page 967 of 1509 215112018 Page 968 of 1509 215112018 Page 969 of 1509 215112018 Page 970 of 1509 215112018 Page 971 of 1509 215112018 Page 972 of 1509 215112018 Page 973 of 1509 215112018 Page 974 of 1509 215112018 Page 975 of 1509 215112018 Page 976 of 1509 215112018 Page 977 of 1509 215112018 Page 978 of 1509 215112018 Page 979 of 1509 215112018 Page 980 of 1509 215112018 Page 981 of 1509 215112018 Page 982 of 1509 215112018 Page 983 of 1509 215112018 Page 984 of 1509 215112018 Page 985 of 1509 215112018 Page 986 of 1509 215112018 Page 987 of 1509 215112018 Page 988 of 1509 215112018 Page 989 of 1509 215112018 Page 990 of 1509 215112018 Page 991 of 1509 215112018 Page 992 of 1509 215112018 Page 993 of 1509 215112018 Page 994 of 1509 215112018 Page 995 of 1509 215112018 Page 996 of 1509 215112018 Page 997 of 1509 215112018 Page 998 of 1509 215112018 Page 999 of 1509 215112018 Page 1000 of 1509 215112018 Page 1001 of 1509 215112018 Page 1002 of 1509 215112018 Page 1003 of 1509 215112018 Page 1004 of 1509 215112018 Page 1005 of 1509 215112018 Page 1006 of 1509 215112018 Page 1007 of 1509 215112018 Page 1008 of 1509 215112018 Page 1009 of 1509 215112018 Page 1010 of 1509 215112018 Page 1011 of 1509 215112018 Page 1012 of 1509 215112018 Page 1013 of 1509 215112018 Page 1014 of 1509 215112018 Page 1015 of 1509 215112018 Page 1016 of 1509 215112018 Page 1017 of 1509 215112018 Page 1018 of 1509 215112018 Page 1019 of 1509 215112018 Page 1020 of 1509 215112018 Page 1021 of 1509 215112018 Page 1022 of 1509 215112018 Page 1023 of 1509 215112018 Page 1024 of 1509 215112018 Page 1025 of 1509 215112018 Page 1026 of 1509 215112018 Page 1027 of 1509 215112018 Page 1028 of 1509 215112018 Page 1029 of 1509 215112018 Page 1030 of 1509 215112018 Page 1031 of 1509 215112018 Page 1032 of 1509 215112018 Page 1033 of 1509 215112018 Page 1034 of 1509 215112018 Page 1035 of 1509 215112018 Page 1036 of 1509 215112018 Page 1037 of 1509 215112018 Page 1038 of 1509 215112018 Page 1039 of 1509 215112018 Page 1040 of 1509 215112018 Page 1041 of 1509 215112018 Page 1042 of 1509 215112018 Page 1043 of 1509 215112018 Page 1044 of 1509 215112018 Page 1045 of 1509 215112018 Page 1046 of 1509 215112018 Page 1047 of 1509 215112018 Page 1048 of 1509 215112018 Page 1049 of 1509 215112018 Page 1050 of 1509 215112018 Page 1051 of 1509 215112018 Page 1052 of 1509 215112018 Page 1053 of 1509 215112018 Page 1054 of 1509 215112018 Page 1055 of 1509 215112018 Page 1056 of 1509 215112018 Page 1057 of 1509 215112018 Page 1058 of 1509 215112018 Page 1059 of 1509 215112018 Page 1060 of 1509 215112018 Page 1061 of 1509 215112018 Page 1062 of 1509 215112018 Page 1063 of 1509 215112018 Page 1064 of 1509 215112018 Page 1065 of 1509 215112018 Page 1066 of 1509 215112018 Page 1067 of 1509 215112018 Page 1068 of 1509 215112018 Page 1069 of 1509 215112018 Page 1070 of 1509 215112018 Page 1071 of 1509 215112018 Page 1072 of 1509 215112018 Page 1073 of 1509 215112018 Page 1074 of 1509 215112018 Page 1075 of 1509 215112018 Page 1076 of 1509 215112018 Page 1077 of 1509 215112018 Page 1078 of 1509 215112018 Page 1079 of 1509 215112018 Page 1080 of 1509 215112018 Page 1081 of 1509 215112018 Page 1082 of 1509 215112018 Page 1083 of 1509 215112018 Page 1084 of 1509 215112018 Page 1085 of 1509 215112018 Page 1086 of 1509 215112018 Page 1087 of 1509 215112018 Page 1088 of 1509 215112018 Page 1089 of 1509 215112018 Page 1090 of 1509 215112018 Page 1091 of 1509 215112018 Page 1092 of 1509 215112018 Page 1093 of 1509 215112018 Page 1094 of 1509 215112018 Page 1095 of 1509 215112018 Page 1096 of 1509 215112018 Page 1097 of 1509 215112018 Page 1098 of 1509 215112018 Page 1099 of 1509 215112018 Page 1100 of 1509 215112018 Page 1101 of 1509 215112018 Page 1102 of 1509 215112018 Page 1103 of 1509 215112018 Page 1104 of 1509 215112018 Page 1105 of 1509 215112018 Page 1106 of 1509 215112018 Page 1107 of 1509 215112018 Page 1108 of 1509 215112018 Page 1109 of 1509 215112018 Page 1110 of 1509 215112018 Page 1111 of 1509 215112018 Page 1112 of 1509 215112018 Page 1113 of 1509 215112018 Page 1114 of 1509 215112018 Page 1115 of 1509 215112018 Page 1116 of 1509 215112018 Page 1117 of 1509 215112018 Page 1118 of 1509 215112018 Page 1119 of 1509 215112018 Page 1120 of 1509 215112018 Page 1121 of 1509 215112018 Page 1122 of 1509 215112018 Page 1123 of 1509 215112018 Page 1124 of 1509 215112018 Page 1125 of 1509 215112018 Page 1126 of 1509 215112018 Page 1127 of 1509 215112018 Page 1128 of 1509 215112018 Page 1129 of 1509 215112018 Page 1130 of 1509 215112018 Page 1131 of 1509 215112018 Page 1132 of 1509 215112018 Page 1133 of 1509 215112018 Page 1134 of 1509 215112018 Page 1135 of 1509 215112018 Page 1136 of 1509 215112018 Page 1137 of 1509 215112018 Page 1138 of 1509 215112018 Page 1139 of 1509 215112018 Page 1140 of 1509 215112018 Page 1141 of 1509 215112018 Page 1142 of 1509 215112018 Page 1143 of 1509 215112018 Page 1144 of 1509 215112018 Page 1145 of 1509 215112018 Page 1146 of 1509 215112018 Page 1147 of 1509 215112018 Page 1148 of 1509 215112018 Page 1149 of 1509 215112018 Page 1150 of 1509 215112018 Page 1151 of 1509 215112018 Page 1152 of 1509 215112018 Page 1153 of 1509 215112018 Page 1154 of 1509 215112018 Page 1155 of 1509 215112018 Page 1156 of 1509 215112018 Page 1157 of 1509 215112018 Page 1158 of 1509 215112018 Page 1159 of 1509 215112018 Page 1160 of 1509 215112018 Page 1161 of 1509 215112018 Page 1162 of 1509 215112018 Page 1163 of 1509 215112018 Page 1164 of 1509 215112018 Page 1165 of 1509 215112018 Page 1166 of 1509 215112018 Page 1167 of 1509 215112018 Page 1168 of 1509 215112018 Page 1169 of 1509 215112018 Page 1170 of 1509 215112018 Page 1171 of 1509 215112018 Page 1172 of 1509 215112018 Page 1173 of 1509 215112018 Page 1174 of 1509 215112018 Page 1175 of 1509 215112018 Page 1176 of 1509 215112018 Page 1177 of 1509 215112018 Page 1178 of 1509 215112018 Page 1179 of 1509 215112018 Page 1180 of 1509 215112018 Page 1181 of 1509 215112018 Page 1182 of 1509 215112018 Page 1183 of 1509 215112018 Page 1184 of 1509 215112018 Page 1185 of 1509 215112018 Page 1186 of 1509 215112018 Page 1187 of 1509 215112018 Page 1188 of 1509 215112018 Page 1189 of 1509 215112018 Page 1190 of 1509 215112018 Page 1191 of 1509 215112018 Page 1192 of 1509 215112018 Page 1193 of 1509 215112018 Page 1194 of 1509 215112018 Page 1195 of 1509 215112018 Page 1196 of 1509 215112018 Page 1197 of 1509 215112018 Page 1198 of 1509 215112018 Page 1199 of 1509 215112018 Page 1200 of 1509 215112018 Page 1201 of 1509 215112018 Page 1202 of 1509 215112018 Page 1203 of 1509 215112018 Page 1204 of 1509 215112018 Page 1205 of 1509 215112018 Page 1206 of 1509 215112018 Page 1207 of 1509 215112018 Page 1208 of 1509 215112018 Page 1209 of 1509 215112018 Page 1210 of 1509 215112018 Page 1211 of 1509 215112018 Page 1212 of 1509 215112018 Page 1213 of 1509 215112018 Page 1214 of 1509 215112018 Page 1215 of 1509 215112018 Page 1216 of 1509 215112018 Page 1217 of 1509 215112018 Page 1218 of 1509 215112018 Page 1219 of 1509 215112018 Page 1220 of 1509 215112018 Page 1221 of 1509 215112018 Page 1222 of 1509 215112018 Page 1223 of 1509 215112018 Page 1224 of 1509 215112018 Page 1225 of 1509 215112018 Page 1226 of 1509 215112018 Page 1227 of 1509 215112018 Page 1228 of 1509 215112018 Page 1229 of 1509 215112018 Page 1230 of 1509 215112018 Page 1231 of 1509 215112018 Page 1232 of 1509 215112018 Page 1233 of 1509 215112018 Page 1234 of 1509 215112018 Page 1235 of 1509 215112018 Page 1236 of 1509 215112018 Page 1237 of 1509 215112018 Page 1238 of 1509 215112018 Page 1239 of 1509 215112018 Page 1240 of 1509 215112018 Page 1241 of 1509 215112018 Page 1242 of 1509 215112018 Page 1243 of 1509 215112018 Page 1244 of 1509 215112018 Page 1245 of 1509 215112018 Page 1246 of 1509 215112018 Page 1247 of 1509 215112018 Page 1248 of 1509 215112018 Page 1249 of 1509 215112018 Page 1250 of 1509 215112018 Page 1251 of 1509 215112018 Page 1252 of 1509 215112018 Page 1253 of 1509 215112018 Page 1254 of 1509 215112018 Page 1255 of 1509 215112018 Page 1256 of 1509 215112018 Page 1257 of 1509 215112018 Page 1258 of 1509 215112018 Page 1259 of 1509 215112018 Page 1260 of 1509 215112018 Page 1261 of 1509 215112018 Page 1262 of 1509 215112018 Page 1263 of 1509 215112018 Page 1264 of 1509 215112018 Page 1265 of 1509 215112018 Page 1266 of 1509 215112018 Page 1267 of 1509 215112018 Page 1268 of 1509 215112018 Page 1269 of 1509 215112018 Page 1270 of 1509 215112018 Page 1271 of 1509 215112018 Page 1272 of 1509 215112018 Page 1273 of 1509 215112018 Page 1274 of 1509 215112018 Page 1275 of 1509 215112018 Page 1276 of 1509 215112018 Page 1277 of 1509 215112018 Page 1278 of 1509 215112018 Page 1279 of 1509 215112018 Page 1280 of 1509 215112018 Page 1281 of 1509 215112018 Page 1282 of 1509 215112018 Page 1283 of 1509 215112018 Page 1284 of 1509 215112018 Page 1285 of 1509 215112018 Page 1286 of 1509 215112018 Page 1287 of 1509 215112018 Page 1288 of 1509 215112018 Page 1289 of 1509 215112018 Page 1290 of 1509 215112018 Page 1291 of 1509 215112018 Page 1292 of 1509 215112018 Page 1293 of 1509 215112018 Page 1294 of 1509 215112018 Page 1295 of 1509 215112018 Page 1296 of 1509 215112018 Page 1297 of 1509 215112018 Page 1298 of 1509 215112018 Page 1299 of 1509 215112018 Page 1300 of 1509 215112018 Page 1301 of 1509 215112018 Page 1302 of 1509 215112018 Page 1303 of 1509 215112018 Page 1304 of 1509 215112018 Page 1305 of 1509 215112018 Page 1306 of 1509 215112018 Page 1307 of 1509 215112018 Page 1308 of 1509 215112018 Page 1309 of 1509 215112018 Page 1310 of 1509 215112018 Page 1311 of 1509 215112018 Page 1312 of 1509 215112018 Page 1313 of 1509 215112018 Page 1314 of 1509 215112018 Page 1315 of 1509 215112018 Page 1316 of 1509 215112018 Page 1317 of 1509 215112018 Page 1318 of 1509 215112018 Page 1319 of 1509 215112018 Page 1320 of 1509 215112018 Page 1321 of 1509 215112018 Page 1322 of 1509 215112018 Page 1323 of 1509 215112018 Page 1324 of 1509 215112018 Page 1325 of 1509 215112018 Page 1326 of 1509 215112018 Page 1327 of 1509 215112018 Page 1328 of 1509 215112018 Page 1329 of 1509 215112018 Page 1330 of 1509 215112018 Page 1331 of 1509 215112018 Page 1332 of 1509 215112018 Page 1333 of 1509 215112018 Page 1334 of 1509 215112018 Page 1335 of 1509 215112018 Page 1336 of 1509 215112018 Page 1337 of 1509 215112018 Page 1338 of 1509 215112018 Page 1339 of 1509 215112018 Page 1340 of 1509 215112018 Page 1341 of 1509 215112018 Page 1342 of 1509 215112018 Page 1343 of 1509 215112018 Page 1344 of 1509 215112018 Page 1345 of 1509 215112018 Page 1346 of 1509 215112018 Page 1347 of 1509 215112018 Page 1348 of 1509 215112018 Page 1349 of 1509 215112018 Page 1350 of 1509 215112018 Page 1351 of 1509 215112018 Page 1352 of 1509 215112018 Page 1353 of 1509 215112018 Page 1354 of 1509 215112018 Page 1355 of 1509 215112018 Page 1356 of 1509 215112018 Page 1357 of 1509 215112018 Page 1358 of 1509 215112018 Page 1359 of 1509 215112018 Page 1360 of 1509 215112018 Page 1361 of 1509 215112018 Page 1362 of 1509 215112018 Page 1363 of 1509 215112018 Page 1364 of 1509 215112018 Page 1365 of 1509 215112018 Page 1366 of 1509 215112018 Page 1367 of 1509 215112018 Page 1368 of 1509 215112018 Page 1369 of 1509 215112018 Page 1370 of 1509 215112018 Page 1371 of 1509 215112018 Page 1372 of 1509 215112018 Page 1373 of 1509 215112018 Page 1374 of 1509 215112018 Page 1375 of 1509 215112018 Page 1376 of 1509 215112018 Page 1377 of 1509 215112018 Page 1378 of 1509 215112018 Page 1379 of 1509 215112018 Page 1380 of 1509 215112018 Page 1381 of 1509 215112018 Page 1382 of 1509 215112018 Page 1383 of 1509 215112018 Page 1384 of 1509 215112018 Page 1385 of 1509 215112018 Page 1386 of 1509 215112018 Page 1387 of 1509 215112018 Page 1388 of 1509 215112018 Page 1389 of 1509 215112018 Page 1390 of 1509 215112018 Page 1391 of 1509 215112018 Page 1392 of 1509 215112018 Page 1393 of 1509 215112018 Page 1394 of 1509 215112018 Page 1395 of 1509 215112018 Page 1396 of 1509 215112018 Page 1397 of 1509 215112018 Page 1398 of 1509 215112018 Page 1399 of 1509 215112018 Page 1400 of 1509 215112018 Page 1401 of 1509 215112018 Page 1402 of 1509 215112018 Page 1403 of 1509 215112018 Page 1404 of 1509 215112018 Page 1405 of 1509 215112018 Page 1406 of 1509 215112018 Page 1407 of 1509 215112018 Page 1408 of 1509 215112018 Page 1409 of 1509 215112018 Page 1410 of 1509 215112018 Page 1411 of 1509 215112018 Page 1412 of 1509 215112018 Page 1413 of 1509 215112018 Page 1414 of 1509 215112018 Page 1415 of 1509 215112018 Page 1416 of 1509 215112018 Page 1417 of 1509 215112018 Page 1418 of 1509 215112018 Page 1419 of 1509 215112018 Page 1420 of 1509 215112018 Page 1421 of 1509 215112018 Page 1422 of 1509 215112018 Page 1423 of 1509 215112018 Page 1424 of 1509 215112018 Page 1425 of 1509 215112018 Page 1426 of 1509 215112018 Page 1427 of 1509 215112018 Page 1428 of 1509 215112018 Page 1429 of 1509 215112018 Page 1430 of 1509 215112018 Page 1431 of 1509 215112018 Page 1432 of 1509 215112018 Page 1433 of 1509 215112018 Page 1434 of 1509 215112018 Page 1435 of 1509 215112018 Page 1436 of 1509 215112018 Page 1437 of 1509 215112018 Page 1438 of 1509 215112018 Page 1439 of 1509 215112018 Page 1440 of 1509 215112018 Page 1441 of 1509 215112018 Page 1442 of 1509 215112018 Page 1443 of 1509 215112018 Page 1444 of 1509 215112018 Page 1445 of 1509 215112018 Page 1446 of 1509 215112018 Page 1447 of 1509 215112018 Page 1448 of 1509 215112018 Page 1449 of 1509 215112018 Page 1450 of 1509 215112018 Page 1451 of 1509 215112018 Page 1452 of 1509 215112018 Page 1453 of 1509 215112018 Page 1454 of 1509 215112018 Page 1455 of 1509 215112018 Page 1456 of 1509 215112018 Page 1457 of 1509 215112018 Page 1458 of 1509 215112018 Page 1459 of 1509 215112018 Page 1460 of 1509 215112018 Page 1461 of 1509 215112018 Page 1462 of 1509 215112018 Page 1463 of 1509 215112018 Page 1464 of 1509 215112018 Page 1465 of 1509 215112018 Page 1466 of 1509 215112018 Page 1467 of 1509 215112018 Page 1468 of 1509 215112018 Page 1469 of 1509 215112018 Page 1470 of 1509 215112018 Page 1471 of 1509 215112018 Page 1472 of 1509 215112018 Page 1473 of 1509 215112018 Page 1474 of 1509 215112018 Page 1475 of 1509 215112018 Page 1476 of 1509 215112018 Page 1477 of 1509 215112018 Page 1478 of 1509 215112018 Page 1479 of 1509 215112018 Page 1480 of 1509 215112018 Page 1481 of 1509 215112018 Page 1482 of 1509 215112018 Page 1483 of 1509 215112018 Page 1484 of 1509 215112018 Page 1485 of 1509 215112018 Page 1486 of 1509 215112018 Page 1487 of 1509 215112018 Page 1488 of 1509 215112018 Page 1489 of 1509 215112018 Page 1490 of 1509 215112018 Page 1491 of 1509 215112018 Page 1492 of 1509 215112018 Page 1493 of 1509 215112018 Page 1494 of 1509 215112018 Page 1495 of 1509 215112018 Page 1496 of 1509 215112018 Page 1497 of 1509 215112018 Page 1498 of 1509 215112018 Page 1499 of 1509 215112018 Page 1500 of 1509 215112018 Page 1501 of 1509 215112018 Page 1502 of 1509 215112018 Page 1503 of 1509 215112018 Page 1504 of 1509 215112018 Page 1505 of 1509 215112018 Page 1506 of 1509 215112018 Page 1507 of 1509 215112018 Page 1508 of 1509 215112018 Page 1509 of 1509 215112028 Page 1 of 1588 215112028 Page 2 of 1588 215112028 Page 3 of 1588 215112028 Page 4 of 1588 215112028 Page 5 of 1588 215112028 Page 6 of 1588 215112028 Page 7 of 1588 215112028 Page 8 of 1588 215112028 Page 9 of 1588 215112028 Page 10 of 1588 215112028 Page 11 of 1588 215112028 Page 12 of 1588 215112028 Page 13 of 1588 215112028 Page 14 of 1588 215112028 Page 15 of 1588 215112028 Page 16 of 1588 215112028 Page 17 of 1588 215112028 Page 18 of 1588 215112028 Page 19 of 1588 215112028 Page 20 of 1588 215112028 Page 21 of 1588 215112028 Page 22 of 1588 215112028 Page 23 of 1588 215112028 Page 24 of 1588 215112028 Page 25 of 1588 215112028 Page 26 of 1588 215112028 Page 27 of 1588 215112028 Page 28 of 1588 215112028 Page 29 of 1588 215112028 Page 30 of 1588 215112028 Page 31 of 1588 215112028 Page 32 of 1588 215112028 Page 33 of 1588 215112028 Page 34 of 1588 215112028 Page 35 of 1588 215112028 Page 36 of 1588 215112028 Page 37 of 1588 215112028 Page 38 of 1588 215112028 Page 39 of 1588 215112028 Page 40 of 1588 215112028 Page 41 of 1588 215112028 Page 42 of 1588 215112028 Page 43 of 1588 215112028 Page 44 of 1588 215112028 Page 45 of 1588 215112028 Page 46 of 1588 215112028 Page 47 of 1588 215112028 Page 48 of 1588 215112028 Page 49 of 1588 215112028 Page 50 of 1588 215112028 Page 51 of 1588 215112028 Page 52 of 1588 215112028 Page 53 of 1588 215112028 Page 54 of 1588 215112028 Page 55 of 1588 215112028 Page 56 of 1588 215112028 Page 57 of 1588 215112028 Page 58 of 1588 215112028 Page 59 of 1588 215112028 Page 60 of 1588 215112028 Page 61 of 1588 215112028 Page 62 of 1588 215112028 Page 63 of 1588 215112028 Page 64 of 1588 215112028 Page 65 of 1588 215112028 Page 66 of 1588 215112028 Page 67 of 1588 215112028 Page 68 of 1588 215112028 Page 69 of 1588 215112028 Page 70 of 1588 215112028 Page 71 of 1588 215112028 Page 72 of 1588 215112028 Page 73 of 1588 215112028 Page 74 of 1588 215112028 Page 75 of 1588 215112028 Page 76 of 1588 215112028 Page 77 of 1588 215112028 Page 78 of 1588 215112028 Page 79 of 1588 215112028 Page 80 of 1588 215112028 Page 81 of 1588 215112028 Page 82 of 1588 215112028 Page 83 of 1588 215112028 Page 84 of 1588 215112028 Page 85 of 1588 215112028 Page 86 of 1588 215112028 Page 87 of 1588 215112028 Page 88 of 1588 215112028 Page 89 of 1588 215112028 Page 90 of 1588 215112028 Page 91 of 1588 215112028 Page 92 of 1588 215112028 Page 93 of 1588 215112028 Page 94 of 1588 215112028 Page 95 of 1588 215112028 Page 96 of 1588 215112028 Page 97 of 1588 215112028 Page 98 of 1588 215112028 Page 99 of 1588 215112028 Page 100 of 1588 215112028 Page 101 of 1588 215112028 Page 102 of 1588 215112028 Page 103 of 1588 215112028 Page 104 of 1588 215112028 Page 105 of 1588 215112028 Page 106 of 1588 215112028 Page 107 of 1588 215112028 Page 108 of 1588 215112028 Page 109 of 1588 215112028 Page 110 of 1588 215112028 Page 111 of 1588 215112028 Page 112 of 1588 215112028 Page 113 of 1588 215112028 Page 114 of 1588 215112028 Page 115 of 1588 215112028 Page 116 of 1588 215112028 Page 117 of 1588 215112028 Page 118 of 1588 215112028 Page 119 of 1588 215112028 Page 120 of 1588 215112028 Page 121 of 1588 215112028 Page 122 of 1588 215112028 Page 123 of 1588 215112028 Page 124 of 1588 215112028 Page 125 of 1588 215112028 Page 126 of 1588 215112028 Page 127 of 1588 215112028 Page 128 of 1588 215112028 Page 129 of 1588 215112028 Page 130 of 1588 215112028 Page 131 of 1588 215112028 Page 132 of 1588 215112028 Page 133 of 1588 215112028 Page 134 of 1588 215112028 Page 135 of 1588 215112028 Page 136 of 1588 215112028 Page 137 of 1588 215112028 Page 138 of 1588 215112028 Page 139 of 1588 215112028 Page 140 of 1588 215112028 Page 141 of 1588 215112028 Page 142 of 1588 215112028 Page 143 of 1588 215112028 Page 144 of 1588 215112028 Page 145 of 1588 215112028 Page 146 of 1588 215112028 Page 147 of 1588 215112028 Page 148 of 1588 215112028 Page 149 of 1588 215112028 Page 150 of 1588 215112028 Page 151 of 1588 215112028 Page 152 of 1588 215112028 Page 153 of 1588 215112028 Page 154 of 1588 215112028 Page 155 of 1588 215112028 Page 156 of 1588 215112028 Page 157 of 1588 215112028 Page 158 of 1588 215112028 Page 159 of 1588 215112028 Page 160 of 1588 215112028 Page 161 of 1588 215112028 Page 162 of 1588 215112028 Page 163 of 1588 215112028 Page 164 of 1588 215112028 Page 165 of 1588 215112028 Page 166 of 1588 215112028 Page 167 of 1588 215112028 Page 168 of 1588 215112028 Page 169 of 1588 215112028 Page 170 of 1588 215112028 Page 171 of 1588 215112028 Page 172 of 1588 215112028 Page 173 of 1588 215112028 Page 174 of 1588 215112028 Page 175 of 1588 215112028 Page 176 of 1588 215112028 Page 177 of 1588 215112028 Page 178 of 1588 215112028 Page 179 of 1588 215112028 Page 180 of 1588 215112028 Page 181 of 1588 215112028 Page 182 of 1588 215112028 Page 183 of 1588 215112028 Page 184 of 1588 215112028 Page 185 of 1588 215112028 Page 186 of 1588 215112028 Page 187 of 1588 215112028 Page 188 of 1588 215112028 Page 189 of 1588 215112028 Page 190 of 1588 215112028 Page 191 of 1588 215112028 Page 192 of 1588 215112028 Page 193 of 1588 215112028 Page 194 of 1588 215112028 Page 195 of 1588 215112028 Page 196 of 1588 215112028 Page 197 of 1588 215112028 Page 198 of 1588 215112028 Page 199 of 1588 215112028 Page 200 of 1588 215112028 Page 201 of 1588 215112028 Page 202 of 1588 215112028 Page 203 of 1588 215112028 Page 204 of 1588 215112028 Page 205 of 1588 215112028 Page 206 of 1588 215112028 Page 207 of 1588 215112028 Page 208 of 1588 215112028 Page 209 of 1588 215112028 Page 210 of 1588 215112028 Page 211 of 1588 215112028 Page 212 of 1588 215112028 Page 213 of 1588 215112028 Page 214 of 1588 215112028 Page 215 of 1588 215112028 Page 216 of 1588 215112028 Page 217 of 1588 215112028 Page 218 of 1588 215112028 Page 219 of 1588 215112028 Page 220 of 1588 215112028 Page 221 of 1588 215112028 Page 222 of 1588 215112028 Page 223 of 1588 215112028 Page 224 of 1588 215112028 Page 225 of 1588 215112028 Page 226 of 1588 215112028 Page 227 of 1588 215112028 Page 228 of 1588 215112028 Page 229 of 1588 215112028 Page 230 of 1588 215112028 Page 231 of 1588 215112028 Page 232 of 1588 215112028 Page 233 of 1588 215112028 Page 234 of 1588 215112028 Page 235 of 1588 215112028 Page 236 of 1588 215112028 Page 237 of 1588 215112028 Page 238 of 1588 215112028 Page 239 of 1588 215112028 Page 240 of 1588 215112028 Page 241 of 1588 215112028 Page 242 of 1588 215112028 Page 243 of 1588 215112028 Page 244 of 1588 215112028 Page 245 of 1588 215112028 Page 246 of 1588 215112028 Page 247 of 1588 215112028 Page 248 of 1588 215112028 Page 249 of 1588 215112028 Page 250 of 1588 215112028 Page 251 of 1588 215112028 Page 252 of 1588 215112028 Page 253 of 1588 215112028 Page 254 of 1588 215112028 Page 255 of 1588 215112028 Page 256 of 1588 215112028 Page 257 of 1588 215112028 Page 258 of 1588 215112028 Page 259 of 1588 215112028 Page 260 of 1588 215112028 Page 261 of 1588 215112028 Page 262 of 1588 215112028 Page 263 of 1588 215112028 Page 264 of 1588 215112028 Page 265 of 1588 215112028 Page 266 of 1588 215112028 Page 267 of 1588 215112028 Page 268 of 1588 215112028 Page 269 of 1588 215112028 Page 270 of 1588 215112028 Page 271 of 1588 215112028 Page 272 of 1588 215112028 Page 273 of 1588 215112028 Page 274 of 1588 215112028 Page 275 of 1588 215112028 Page 276 of 1588 215112028 Page 277 of 1588 215112028 Page 278 of 1588 215112028 Page 279 of 1588 215112028 Page 280 of 1588 215112028 Page 281 of 1588 215112028 Page 282 of 1588 215112028 Page 283 of 1588 215112028 Page 284 of 1588 215112028 Page 285 of 1588 215112028 Page 286 of 1588 215112028 Page 287 of 1588 215112028 Page 288 of 1588 215112028 Page 289 of 1588 215112028 Page 290 of 1588 215112028 Page 291 of 1588 215112028 Page 292 of 1588 215112028 Page 293 of 1588 215112028 Page 294 of 1588 215112028 Page 295 of 1588 215112028 Page 296 of 1588 215112028 Page 297 of 1588 215112028 Page 298 of 1588 215112028 Page 299 of 1588 215112028 Page 300 of 1588 215112028 Page 301 of 1588 215112028 Page 302 of 1588 215112028 Page 303 of 1588 215112028 Page 304 of 1588 215112028 Page 305 of 1588 215112028 Page 306 of 1588 215112028 Page 307 of 1588 215112028 Page 308 of 1588 215112028 Page 309 of 1588 215112028 Page 310 of 1588 215112028 Page 311 of 1588 215112028 Page 312 of 1588 215112028 Page 313 of 1588 215112028 Page 314 of 1588 215112028 Page 315 of 1588 215112028 Page 316 of 1588 215112028 Page 317 of 1588 215112028 Page 318 of 1588 215112028 Page 319 of 1588 215112028 Page 320 of 1588 215112028 Page 321 of 1588 215112028 Page 322 of 1588 215112028 Page 323 of 1588 215112028 Page 324 of 1588 215112028 Page 325 of 1588 215112028 Page 326 of 1588 215112028 Page 327 of 1588 215112028 Page 328 of 1588 215112028 Page 329 of 1588 215112028 Page 330 of 1588 215112028 Page 331 of 1588 215112028 Page 332 of 1588 215112028 Page 333 of 1588 215112028 Page 334 of 1588 215112028 Page 335 of 1588 215112028 Page 336 of 1588 215112028 Page 337 of 1588 215112028 Page 338 of 1588 215112028 Page 339 of 1588 215112028 Page 340 of 1588 215112028 Page 341 of 1588 215112028 Page 342 of 1588 215112028 Page 343 of 1588 215112028 Page 344 of 1588 215112028 Page 345 of 1588 215112028 Page 346 of 1588 215112028 Page 347 of 1588 215112028 Page 348 of 1588 215112028 Page 349 of 1588 215112028 Page 350 of 1588 215112028 Page 351 of 1588 215112028 Page 352 of 1588 215112028 Page 353 of 1588 215112028 Page 354 of 1588 215112028 Page 355 of 1588 215112028 Page 356 of 1588 215112028 Page 357 of 1588 215112028 Page 358 of 1588 215112028 Page 359 of 1588 215112028 Page 360 of 1588 215112028 Page 361 of 1588 215112028 Page 362 of 1588 215112028 Page 363 of 1588 215112028 Page 364 of 1588 215112028 Page 365 of 1588 215112028 Page 366 of 1588 215112028 Page 367 of 1588 215112028 Page 368 of 1588 215112028 Page 369 of 1588 215112028 Page 370 of 1588 215112028 Page 371 of 1588 215112028 Page 372 of 1588 215112028 Page 373 of 1588 215112028 Page 374 of 1588 215112028 Page 375 of 1588 215112028 Page 376 of 1588 215112028 Page 377 of 1588 215112028 Page 378 of 1588 215112028 Page 379 of 1588 215112028 Page 380 of 1588 215112028 Page 381 of 1588 215112028 Page 382 of 1588 215112028 Page 383 of 1588 215112028 Page 384 of 1588 215112028 Page 385 of 1588 215112028 Page 386 of 1588 215112028 Page 387 of 1588 215112028 Page 388 of 1588 215112028 Page 389 of 1588 215112028 Page 390 of 1588 215112028 Page 391 of 1588 215112028 Page 392 of 1588 215112028 Page 393 of 1588 215112028 Page 394 of 1588 215112028 Page 395 of 1588 215112028 Page 396 of 1588 215112028 Page 397 of 1588 215112028 Page 398 of 1588 215112028 Page 399 of 1588 215112028 Page 400 of 1588 215112028 Page 401 of 1588 215112028 Page 402 of 1588 215112028 Page 403 of 1588 215112028 Page 404 of 1588 215112028 Page 405 of 1588 215112028 Page 406 of 1588 215112028 Page 407 of 1588 215112028 Page 408 of 1588 215112028 Page 409 of 1588 215112028 Page 410 of 1588 215112028 Page 411 of 1588 215112028 Page 412 of 1588 215112028 Page 413 of 1588 215112028 Page 414 of 1588 215112028 Page 415 of 1588 215112028 Page 416 of 1588 215112028 Page 417 of 1588 215112028 Page 418 of 1588 215112028 Page 419 of 1588 215112028 Page 420 of 1588 215112028 Page 421 of 1588 215112028 Page 422 of 1588 215112028 Page 423 of 1588 215112028 Page 424 of 1588 215112028 Page 425 of 1588 215112028 Page 426 of 1588 215112028 Page 427 of 1588 215112028 Page 428 of 1588 215112028 Page 429 of 1588 215112028 Page 430 of 1588 215112028 Page 431 of 1588 215112028 Page 432 of 1588 215112028 Page 433 of 1588 215112028 Page 434 of 1588 215112028 Page 435 of 1588 215112028 Page 436 of 1588 215112028 Page 437 of 1588 215112028 Page 438 of 1588 215112028 Page 439 of 1588 215112028 Page 440 of 1588 215112028 Page 441 of 1588 215112028 Page 442 of 1588 215112028 Page 443 of 1588 215112028 Page 444 of 1588 215112028 Page 445 of 1588 215112028 Page 446 of 1588 215112028 Page 447 of 1588 215112028 Page 448 of 1588 215112028 Page 449 of 1588 215112028 Page 450 of 1588 215112028 Page 451 of 1588 215112028 Page 452 of 1588 215112028 Page 453 of 1588 215112028 Page 454 of 1588 215112028 Page 455 of 1588 215112028 Page 456 of 1588 215112028 Page 457 of 1588 215112028 Page 458 of 1588 215112028 Page 459 of 1588 215112028 Page 460 of 1588 215112028 Page 461 of 1588 215112028 Page 462 of 1588 215112028 Page 463 of 1588 215112028 Page 464 of 1588 215112028 Page 465 of 1588 215112028 Page 466 of 1588 215112028 Page 467 of 1588 215112028 Page 468 of 1588 215112028 Page 469 of 1588 215112028 Page 470 of 1588 215112028 Page 471 of 1588 215112028 Page 472 of 1588 215112028 Page 473 of 1588 215112028 Page 474 of 1588 215112028 Page 475 of 1588 215112028 Page 476 of 1588 215112028 Page 477 of 1588 215112028 Page 478 of 1588 215112028 Page 479 of 1588 215112028 Page 480 of 1588 215112028 Page 481 of 1588 215112028 Page 482 of 1588 215112028 Page 483 of 1588 215112028 Page 484 of 1588 215112028 Page 485 of 1588 215112028 Page 486 of 1588 215112028 Page 487 of 1588 215112028 Page 488 of 1588 215112028 Page 489 of 1588 215112028 Page 490 of 1588 215112028 Page 491 of 1588 215112028 Page 492 of 1588 215112028 Page 493 of 1588 215112028 Page 494 of 1588 215112028 Page 495 of 1588 215112028 Page 496 of 1588 215112028 Page 497 of 1588 215112028 Page 498 of 1588 215112028 Page 499 of 1588 215112028 Page 500 of 1588 215112028 Page 501 of 1588 215112028 Page 502 of 1588 215112028 Page 503 of 1588 215112028 Page 504 of 1588 215112028 Page 505 of 1588 215112028 Page 506 of 1588 215112028 Page 507 of 1588 215112028 Page 508 of 1588 215112028 Page 509 of 1588 215112028 Page 510 of 1588 215112028 Page 511 of 1588 215112028 Page 512 of 1588 215112028 Page 513 of 1588 215112028 Page 514 of 1588 215112028 Page 515 of 1588 215112028 Page 516 of 1588 215112028 Page 517 of 1588 215112028 Page 518 of 1588 215112028 Page 519 of 1588 215112028 Page 520 of 1588 215112028 Page 521 of 1588 215112028 Page 522 of 1588 215112028 Page 523 of 1588 215112028 Page 524 of 1588 215112028 Page 525 of 1588 215112028 Page 526 of 1588 215112028 Page 527 of 1588 215112028 Page 528 of 1588 215112028 Page 529 of 1588 215112028 Page 530 of 1588 215112028 Page 531 of 1588 215112028 Page 532 of 1588 215112028 Page 533 of 1588 215112028 Page 534 of 1588 215112028 Page 535 of 1588 215112028 Page 536 of 1588 215112028 Page 537 of 1588 215112028 Page 538 of 1588 215112028 Page 539 of 1588 215112028 Page 540 of 1588 215112028 Page 541 of 1588 215112028 Page 542 of 1588 215112028 Page 543 of 1588 215112028 Page 544 of 1588 215112028 Page 545 of 1588 215112028 Page 546 of 1588 215112028 Page 547 of 1588 215112028 Page 548 of 1588 215112028 Page 549 of 1588 215112028 Page 550 of 1588 215112028 Page 551 of 1588 215112028 Page 552 of 1588 215112028 Page 553 of 1588 215112028 Page 554 of 1588 215112028 Page 555 of 1588 215112028 Page 556 of 1588 215112028 Page 557 of 1588 215112028 Page 558 of 1588 215112028 Page 559 of 1588 215112028 Page 560 of 1588 215112028 Page 561 of 1588 215112028 Page 562 of 1588 215112028 Page 563 of 1588 215112028 Page 564 of 1588 215112028 Page 565 of 1588 215112028 Page 566 of 1588 215112028 Page 567 of 1588 215112028 Page 568 of 1588 215112028 Page 569 of 1588 215112028 Page 570 of 1588 215112028 Page 571 of 1588 215112028 Page 572 of 1588 215112028 Page 573 of 1588 215112028 Page 574 of 1588 215112028 Page 575 of 1588 215112028 Page 576 of 1588 215112028 Page 577 of 1588 215112028 Page 578 of 1588 215112028 Page 579 of 1588 215112028 Page 580 of 1588 215112028 Page 581 of 1588 215112028 Page 582 of 1588 215112028 Page 583 of 1588 215112028 Page 584 of 1588 215112028 Page 585 of 1588 215112028 Page 586 of 1588 215112028 Page 587 of 1588 215112028 Page 588 of 1588 215112028 Page 589 of 1588 215112028 Page 590 of 1588 215112028 Page 591 of 1588 215112028 Page 592 of 1588 215112028 Page 593 of 1588 215112028 Page 594 of 1588 215112028 Page 595 of 1588 215112028 Page 596 of 1588 215112028 Page 597 of 1588 215112028 Page 598 of 1588 215112028 Page 599 of 1588 215112028 Page 600 of 1588 215112028 Page 601 of 1588 215112028 Page 602 of 1588 215112028 Page 603 of 1588 215112028 Page 604 of 1588 215112028 Page 605 of 1588 215112028 Page 606 of 1588 215112028 Page 607 of 1588 215112028 Page 608 of 1588 215112028 Page 609 of 1588 215112028 Page 610 of 1588 215112028 Page 611 of 1588 215112028 Page 612 of 1588 215112028 Page 613 of 1588 215112028 Page 614 of 1588 215112028 Page 615 of 1588 215112028 Page 616 of 1588 215112028 Page 617 of 1588 215112028 Page 618 of 1588 215112028 Page 619 of 1588 215112028 Page 620 of 1588 215112028 Page 621 of 1588 215112028 Page 622 of 1588 215112028 Page 623 of 1588 215112028 Page 624 of 1588 215112028 Page 625 of 1588 215112028 Page 626 of 1588 215112028 Page 627 of 1588 215112028 Page 628 of 1588 215112028 Page 629 of 1588 215112028 Page 630 of 1588 215112028 Page 631 of 1588 215112028 Page 632 of 1588 215112028 Page 633 of 1588 215112028 Page 634 of 1588 215112028 Page 635 of 1588 215112028 Page 636 of 1588 215112028 Page 637 of 1588 215112028 Page 638 of 1588 215112028 Page 639 of 1588 215112028 Page 640 of 1588 215112028 Page 641 of 1588 215112028 Page 642 of 1588 215112028 Page 643 of 1588 215112028 Page 644 of 1588 215112028 Page 645 of 1588 215112028 Page 646 of 1588 215112028 Page 647 of 1588 215112028 Page 648 of 1588 215112028 Page 649 of 1588 215112028 Page 650 of 1588 215112028 Page 651 of 1588 215112028 Page 652 of 1588 215112028 Page 653 of 1588 215112028 Page 654 of 1588 215112028 Page 655 of 1588 215112028 Page 656 of 1588 215112028 Page 657 of 1588 215112028 Page 658 of 1588 215112028 Page 659 of 1588 215112028 Page 660 of 1588 215112028 Page 661 of 1588 215112028 Page 662 of 1588 215112028 Page 663 of 1588 215112028 Page 664 of 1588 215112028 Page 665 of 1588 215112028 Page 666 of 1588 215112028 Page 667 of 1588 215112028 Page 668 of 1588 215112028 Page 669 of 1588 215112028 Page 670 of 1588 215112028 Page 671 of 1588 215112028 Page 672 of 1588 215112028 Page 673 of 1588 215112028 Page 674 of 1588 215112028 Page 675 of 1588 215112028 Page 676 of 1588 215112028 Page 677 of 1588 215112028 Page 678 of 1588 215112028 Page 679 of 1588 215112028 Page 680 of 1588 215112028 Page 681 of 1588 215112028 Page 682 of 1588 215112028 Page 683 of 1588 215112028 Page 684 of 1588 215112028 Page 685 of 1588 215112028 Page 686 of 1588 215112028 Page 687 of 1588 215112028 Page 688 of 1588 215112028 Page 689 of 1588 215112028 Page 690 of 1588 215112028 Page 691 of 1588 215112028 Page 692 of 1588 215112028 Page 693 of 1588 215112028 Page 694 of 1588 215112028 Page 695 of 1588 215112028 Page 696 of 1588 215112028 Page 697 of 1588 215112028 Page 698 of 1588 215112028 Page 699 of 1588 215112028 Page 700 of 1588 215112028 Page 701 of 1588 215112028 Page 702 of 1588 215112028 Page 703 of 1588 215112028 Page 704 of 1588 215112028 Page 705 of 1588 215112028 Page 706 of 1588 215112028 Page 707 of 1588 215112028 Page 708 of 1588 215112028 Page 709 of 1588 215112028 Page 710 of 1588 215112028 Page 711 of 1588 215112028 Page 712 of 1588 215112028 Page 713 of 1588 215112028 Page 714 of 1588 215112028 Page 715 of 1588 215112028 Page 716 of 1588 215112028 Page 717 of 1588 215112028 Page 718 of 1588 215112028 Page 719 of 1588 215112028 Page 720 of 1588 215112028 Page 721 of 1588 215112028 Page 722 of 1588 215112028 Page 723 of 1588 215112028 Page 724 of 1588 215112028 Page 725 of 1588 215112028 Page 726 of 1588 215112028 Page 727 of 1588 215112028 Page 728 of 1588 215112028 Page 729 of 1588 215112028 Page 730 of 1588 215112028 Page 731 of 1588 215112028 Page 732 of 1588 215112028 Page 733 of 1588 215112028 Page 734 of 1588 215112028 Page 735 of 1588 215112028 Page 736 of 1588 215112028 Page 737 of 1588 215112028 Page 738 of 1588 215112028 Page 739 of 1588 215112028 Page 740 of 1588 215112028 Page 741 of 1588 215112028 Page 742 of 1588 215112028 Page 743 of 1588 215112028 Page 744 of 1588 215112028 Page 745 of 1588 215112028 Page 746 of 1588 215112028 Page 747 of 1588 215112028 Page 748 of 1588 215112028 Page 749 of 1588 215112028 Page 750 of 1588 215112028 Page 751 of 1588 215112028 Page 752 of 1588 215112028 Page 753 of 1588 215112028 Page 754 of 1588 215112028 Page 755 of 1588 215112028 Page 756 of 1588 215112028 Page 757 of 1588 215112028 Page 758 of 1588 215112028 Page 759 of 1588 215112028 Page 760 of 1588 215112028 Page 761 of 1588 215112028 Page 762 of 1588 215112028 Page 763 of 1588 215112028 Page 764 of 1588 215112028 Page 765 of 1588 215112028 Page 766 of 1588 215112028 Page 767 of 1588 215112028 Page 768 of 1588 215112028 Page 769 of 1588 215112028 Page 770 of 1588 215112028 Page 771 of 1588 215112028 Page 772 of 1588 215112028 Page 773 of 1588 215112028 Page 774 of 1588 215112028 Page 775 of 1588 215112028 Page 776 of 1588 215112028 Page 777 of 1588 215112028 Page 778 of 1588 215112028 Page 779 of 1588 215112028 Page 780 of 1588 215112028 Page 781 of 1588 215112028 Page 782 of 1588 215112028 Page 783 of 1588 215112028 Page 784 of 1588 215112028 Page 785 of 1588 215112028 Page 786 of 1588 215112028 Page 787 of 1588 215112028 Page 788 of 1588 215112028 Page 789 of 1588 215112028 Page 790 of 1588 215112028 Page 791 of 1588 215112028 Page 792 of 1588 215112028 Page 793 of 1588 215112028 Page 794 of 1588 215112028 Page 795 of 1588 215112028 Page 796 of 1588 215112028 Page 797 of 1588 215112028 Page 798 of 1588 215112028 Page 799 of 1588 215112028 Page 800 of 1588 215112028 Page 801 of 1588 215112028 Page 802 of 1588 215112028 Page 803 of 1588 215112028 Page 804 of 1588 215112028 Page 805 of 1588 215112028 Page 806 of 1588 215112028 Page 807 of 1588 215112028 Page 808 of 1588 215112028 Page 809 of 1588 215112028 Page 810 of 1588 215112028 Page 811 of 1588 215112028 Page 812 of 1588 215112028 Page 813 of 1588 215112028 Page 814 of 1588 215112028 Page 815 of 1588 215112028 Page 816 of 1588 215112028 Page 817 of 1588 215112028 Page 818 of 1588 215112028 Page 819 of 1588 215112028 Page 820 of 1588 215112028 Page 821 of 1588 215112028 Page 822 of 1588 215112028 Page 823 of 1588 215112028 Page 824 of 1588 215112028 Page 825 of 1588 215112028 Page 826 of 1588 215112028 Page 827 of 1588 215112028 Page 828 of 1588 215112028 Page 829 of 1588 215112028 Page 830 of 1588 215112028 Page 831 of 1588 215112028 Page 832 of 1588 215112028 Page 833 of 1588 215112028 Page 834 of 1588 215112028 Page 835 of 1588 215112028 Page 836 of 1588 215112028 Page 837 of 1588 215112028 Page 838 of 1588 215112028 Page 839 of 1588 215112028 Page 840 of 1588 215112028 Page 841 of 1588 215112028 Page 842 of 1588 215112028 Page 843 of 1588 215112028 Page 844 of 1588 215112028 Page 845 of 1588 215112028 Page 846 of 1588 215112028 Page 847 of 1588 215112028 Page 848 of 1588 215112028 Page 849 of 1588 215112028 Page 850 of 1588 215112028 Page 851 of 1588 215112028 Page 852 of 1588 215112028 Page 853 of 1588 215112028 Page 854 of 1588 215112028 Page 855 of 1588 215112028 Page 856 of 1588 215112028 Page 857 of 1588 215112028 Page 858 of 1588 215112028 Page 859 of 1588 215112028 Page 860 of 1588 215112028 Page 861 of 1588 215112028 Page 862 of 1588 215112028 Page 863 of 1588 215112028 Page 864 of 1588 215112028 Page 865 of 1588 215112028 Page 866 of 1588 215112028 Page 867 of 1588 215112028 Page 868 of 1588 215112028 Page 869 of 1588 215112028 Page 870 of 1588 215112028 Page 871 of 1588 215112028 Page 872 of 1588 215112028 Page 873 of 1588 215112028 Page 874 of 1588 215112028 Page 875 of 1588 215112028 Page 876 of 1588 215112028 Page 877 of 1588 215112028 Page 878 of 1588 215112028 Page 879 of 1588 215112028 Page 880 of 1588 215112028 Page 881 of 1588 215112028 Page 882 of 1588 215112028 Page 883 of 1588 215112028 Page 884 of 1588 215112028 Page 885 of 1588 215112028 Page 886 of 1588 215112028 Page 887 of 1588 215112028 Page 888 of 1588 215112028 Page 889 of 1588 215112028 Page 890 of 1588 215112028 Page 891 of 1588 215112028 Page 892 of 1588 215112028 Page 893 of 1588 215112028 Page 894 of 1588 215112028 Page 895 of 1588 215112028 Page 896 of 1588 215112028 Page 897 of 1588 215112028 Page 898 of 1588 215112028 Page 899 of 1588 215112028 Page 900 of 1588 215112028 Page 901 of 1588 215112028 Page 902 of 1588 215112028 Page 903 of 1588 215112028 Page 904 of 1588 215112028 Page 905 of 1588 215112028 Page 906 of 1588 215112028 Page 907 of 1588 215112028 Page 908 of 1588 215112028 Page 909 of 1588 215112028 Page 910 of 1588 215112028 Page 911 of 1588 215112028 Page 912 of 1588 215112028 Page 913 of 1588 215112028 Page 914 of 1588 215112028 Page 915 of 1588 215112028 Page 916 of 1588 215112028 Page 917 of 1588 215112028 Page 918 of 1588 215112028 Page 919 of 1588 215112028 Page 920 of 1588 215112028 Page 921 of 1588 215112028 Page 922 of 1588 215112028 Page 923 of 1588 215112028 Page 924 of 1588 215112028 Page 925 of 1588 215112028 Page 926 of 1588 215112028 Page 927 of 1588 215112028 Page 928 of 1588 215112028 Page 929 of 1588 215112028 Page 930 of 1588 215112028 Page 931 of 1588 215112028 Page 932 of 1588 215112028 Page 933 of 1588 215112028 Page 934 of 1588 215112028 Page 935 of 1588 215112028 Page 936 of 1588 215112028 Page 937 of 1588 215112028 Page 938 of 1588 215112028 Page 939 of 1588 215112028 Page 940 of 1588 215112028 Page 941 of 1588 215112028 Page 942 of 1588 215112028 Page 943 of 1588 215112028 Page 944 of 1588 215112028 Page 945 of 1588 215112028 Page 946 of 1588 215112028 Page 947 of 1588 215112028 Page 948 of 1588 215112028 Page 949 of 1588 215112028 Page 950 of 1588 215112028 Page 951 of 1588 215112028 Page 952 of 1588 215112028 Page 953 of 1588 215112028 Page 954 of 1588 215112028 Page 955 of 1588 215112028 Page 956 of 1588 215112028 Page 957 of 1588 215112028 Page 958 of 1588 215112028 Page 959 of 1588 215112028 Page 960 of 1588 215112028 Page 961 of 1588 215112028 Page 962 of 1588 215112028 Page 963 of 1588 215112028 Page 964 of 1588 215112028 Page 965 of 1588 215112028 Page 966 of 1588 215112028 Page 967 of 1588 215112028 Page 968 of 1588 215112028 Page 969 of 1588 215112028 Page 970 of 1588 215112028 Page 971 of 1588 215112028 Page 972 of 1588 215112028 Page 973 of 1588 215112028 Page 974 of 1588 215112028 Page 975 of 1588 215112028 Page 976 of 1588 215112028 Page 977 of 1588 215112028 Page 978 of 1588 215112028 Page 979 of 1588 215112028 Page 980 of 1588 215112028 Page 981 of 1588 215112028 Page 982 of 1588 215112028 Page 983 of 1588 215112028 Page 984 of 1588 215112028 Page 985 of 1588 215112028 Page 986 of 1588 215112028 Page 987 of 1588 215112028 Page 988 of 1588 215112028 Page 989 of 1588 215112028 Page 990 of 1588 215112028 Page 991 of 1588 215112028 Page 992 of 1588 215112028 Page 993 of 1588 215112028 Page 994 of 1588 215112028 Page 995 of 1588 215112028 Page 996 of 1588 215112028 Page 997 of 1588 215112028 Page 998 of 1588 215112028 Page 999 of 1588 215112028 Page 1000 of 1588 215112028 Page 1001 of 1588 215112028 Page 1002 of 1588 215112028 Page 1003 of 1588 215112028 Page 1004 of 1588 215112028 Page 1005 of 1588 215112028 Page 1006 of 1588 215112028 Page 1007 of 1588 215112028 Page 1008 of 1588 215112028 Page 1009 of 1588 215112028 Page 1010 of 1588 215112028 Page 1011 of 1588 215112028 Page 1012 of 1588 215112028 Page 1013 of 1588 215112028 Page 1014 of 1588 215112028 Page 1015 of 1588 215112028 Page 1016 of 1588 215112028 Page 1017 of 1588 215112028 Page 1018 of 1588 215112028 Page 1019 of 1588 215112028 Page 1020 of 1588 215112028 Page 1021 of 1588 215112028 Page 1022 of 1588 215112028 Page 1023 of 1588 215112028 Page 1024 of 1588 215112028 Page 1025 of 1588 215112028 Page 1026 of 1588 215112028 Page 1027 of 1588 215112028 Page 1028 of 1588 215112028 Page 1029 of 1588 215112028 Page 1030 of 1588 215112028 Page 1031 of 1588 215112028 Page 1032 of 1588 215112028 Page 1033 of 1588 215112028 Page 1034 of 1588 215112028 Page 1035 of 1588 215112028 Page 1036 of 1588 215112028 Page 1037 of 1588 215112028 Page 1038 of 1588 215112028 Page 1039 of 1588 215112028 Page 1040 of 1588 215112028 Page 1041 of 1588 215112028 Page 1042 of 1588 215112028 Page 1043 of 1588 215112028 Page 1044 of 1588 215112028 Page 1045 of 1588 215112028 Page 1046 of 1588 215112028 Page 1047 of 1588 215112028 Page 1048 of 1588 215112028 Page 1049 of 1588 215112028 Page 1050 of 1588 215112028 Page 1051 of 1588 215112028 Page 1052 of 1588 215112028 Page 1053 of 1588 215112028 Page 1054 of 1588 215112028 Page 1055 of 1588 215112028 Page 1056 of 1588 215112028 Page 1057 of 1588 215112028 Page 1058 of 1588 215112028 Page 1059 of 1588 215112028 Page 1060 of 1588 215112028 Page 1061 of 1588 215112028 Page 1062 of 1588 215112028 Page 1063 of 1588 215112028 Page 1064 of 1588 215112028 Page 1065 of 1588 215112028 Page 1066 of 1588 215112028 Page 1067 of 1588 215112028 Page 1068 of 1588 215112028 Page 1069 of 1588 215112028 Page 1070 of 1588 215112028 Page 1071 of 1588 215112028 Page 1072 of 1588 215112028 Page 1073 of 1588 215112028 Page 1074 of 1588 215112028 Page 1075 of 1588 215112028 Page 1076 of 1588 215112028 Page 1077 of 1588 215112028 Page 1078 of 1588 215112028 Page 1079 of 1588 215112028 Page 1080 of 1588 215112028 Page 1081 of 1588 215112028 Page 1082 of 1588 215112028 Page 1083 of 1588 215112028 Page 1084 of 1588 215112028 Page 1085 of 1588 215112028 Page 1086 of 1588 215112028 Page 1087 of 1588 215112028 Page 1088 of 1588 215112028 Page 1089 of 1588 215112028 Page 1090 of 1588 215112028 Page 1091 of 1588 215112028 Page 1092 of 1588 215112028 Page 1093 of 1588 215112028 Page 1094 of 1588 215112028 Page 1095 of 1588 215112028 Page 1096 of 1588 215112028 Page 1097 of 1588 215112028 Page 1098 of 1588 215112028 Page 1099 of 1588 215112028 Page 1100 of 1588 215112028 Page 1101 of 1588 215112028 Page 1102 of 1588 215112028 Page 1103 of 1588 215112028 Page 1104 of 1588 215112028 Page 1105 of 1588 215112028 Page 1106 of 1588 215112028 Page 1107 of 1588 215112028 Page 1108 of 1588 215112028 Page 1109 of 1588 215112028 Page 1110 of 1588 215112028 Page 1111 of 1588 215112028 Page 1112 of 1588 215112028 Page 1113 of 1588 215112028 Page 1114 of 1588 215112028 Page 1115 of 1588 215112028 Page 1116 of 1588 215112028 Page 1117 of 1588 215112028 Page 1118 of 1588 215112028 Page 1119 of 1588 215112028 Page 1120 of 1588 215112028 Page 1121 of 1588 215112028 Page 1122 of 1588 215112028 Page 1123 of 1588 215112028 Page 1124 of 1588 215112028 Page 1125 of 1588 215112028 Page 1126 of 1588 215112028 Page 1127 of 1588 215112028 Page 1128 of 1588 215112028 Page 1129 of 1588 215112028 Page 1130 of 1588 215112028 Page 1131 of 1588 215112028 Page 1132 of 1588 215112028 Page 1133 of 1588 215112028 Page 1134 of 1588 215112028 Page 1135 of 1588 215112028 Page 1136 of 1588 215112028 Page 1137 of 1588 215112028 Page 1138 of 1588 215112028 Page 1139 of 1588 215112028 Page 1140 of 1588 215112028 Page 1141 of 1588 215112028 Page 1142 of 1588 215112028 Page 1143 of 1588 215112028 Page 1144 of 1588 215112028 Page 1145 of 1588 215112028 Page 1146 of 1588 215112028 Page 1147 of 1588 215112028 Page 1148 of 1588 215112028 Page 1149 of 1588 215112028 Page 1150 of 1588 215112028 Page 1151 of 1588 215112028 Page 1152 of 1588 215112028 Page 1153 of 1588 215112028 Page 1154 of 1588 215112028 Page 1155 of 1588 215112028 Page 1156 of 1588 215112028 Page 1157 of 1588 215112028 Page 1158 of 1588 215112028 Page 1159 of 1588 215112028 Page 1160 of 1588 215112028 Page 1161 of 1588 215112028 Page 1162 of 1588 215112028 Page 1163 of 1588 215112028 Page 1164 of 1588 215112028 Page 1165 of 1588 215112028 Page 1166 of 1588 215112028 Page 1167 of 1588 215112028 Page 1168 of 1588 215112028 Page 1169 of 1588 215112028 Page 1170 of 1588 215112028 Page 1171 of 1588 215112028 Page 1172 of 1588 215112028 Page 1173 of 1588 215112028 Page 1174 of 1588 215112028 Page 1175 of 1588 215112028 Page 1176 of 1588 215112028 Page 1177 of 1588 215112028 Page 1178 of 1588 215112028 Page 1179 of 1588 215112028 Page 1180 of 1588 215112028 Page 1181 of 1588 215112028 Page 1182 of 1588 215112028 Page 1183 of 1588 215112028 Page 1184 of 1588 215112028 Page 1185 of 1588 215112028 Page 1186 of 1588 215112028 Page 1187 of 1588 215112028 Page 1188 of 1588 215112028 Page 1189 of 1588 215112028 Page 1190 of 1588 215112028 Page 1191 of 1588 215112028 Page 1192 of 1588 215112028 Page 1193 of 1588 215112028 Page 1194 of 1588 215112028 Page 1195 of 1588 215112028 Page 1196 of 1588 215112028 Page 1197 of 1588 215112028 Page 1198 of 1588 215112028 Page 1199 of 1588 215112028 Page 1200 of 1588 215112028 Page 1201 of 1588 215112028 Page 1202 of 1588 215112028 Page 1203 of 1588 215112028 Page 1204 of 1588 215112028 Page 1205 of 1588 215112028 Page 1206 of 1588 215112028 Page 1207 of 1588 215112028 Page 1208 of 1588 215112028 Page 1209 of 1588 215112028 Page 1210 of 1588 215112028 Page 1211 of 1588 215112028 Page 1212 of 1588 215112028 Page 1213 of 1588 215112028 Page 1214 of 1588 215112028 Page 1215 of 1588 215112028 Page 1216 of 1588 215112028 Page 1217 of 1588 215112028 Page 1218 of 1588 215112028 Page 1219 of 1588 215112028 Page 1220 of 1588 215112028 Page 1221 of 1588 215112028 Page 1222 of 1588 215112028 Page 1223 of 1588 215112028 Page 1224 of 1588 215112028 Page 1225 of 1588 215112028 Page 1226 of 1588 215112028 Page 1227 of 1588 215112028 Page 1228 of 1588 215112028 Page 1229 of 1588 215112028 Page 1230 of 1588 215112028 Page 1231 of 1588 215112028 Page 1232 of 1588 215112028 Page 1233 of 1588 215112028 Page 1234 of 1588 215112028 Page 1235 of 1588 215112028 Page 1236 of 1588 215112028 Page 1237 of 1588 215112028 Page 1238 of 1588 215112028 Page 1239 of 1588 215112028 Page 1240 of 1588 215112028 Page 1241 of 1588 215112028 Page 1242 of 1588 215112028 Page 1243 of 1588 215112028 Page 1244 of 1588 215112028 Page 1245 of 1588 215112028 Page 1246 of 1588 215112028 Page 1247 of 1588 215112028 Page 1248 of 1588 215112028 Page 1249 of 1588 215112028 Page 1250 of 1588 215112028 Page 1251 of 1588 215112028 Page 1252 of 1588 215112028 Page 1253 of 1588 215112028 Page 1254 of 1588 215112028 Page 1255 of 1588 215112028 Page 1256 of 1588 215112028 Page 1257 of 1588 215112028 Page 1258 of 1588 215112028 Page 1259 of 1588 215112028 Page 1260 of 1588 215112028 Page 1261 of 1588 215112028 Page 1262 of 1588 215112028 Page 1263 of 1588 215112028 Page 1264 of 1588 215112028 Page 1265 of 1588 215112028 Page 1266 of 1588 215112028 Page 1267 of 1588 215112028 Page 1268 of 1588 215112028 Page 1269 of 1588 215112028 Page 1270 of 1588 215112028 Page 1271 of 1588 215112028 Page 1272 of 1588 215112028 Page 1273 of 1588 215112028 Page 1274 of 1588 215112028 Page 1275 of 1588 215112028 Page 1276 of 1588 215112028 Page 1277 of 1588 215112028 Page 1278 of 1588 215112028 Page 1279 of 1588 215112028 Page 1280 of 1588 215112028 Page 1281 of 1588 215112028 Page 1282 of 1588 215112028 Page 1283 of 1588 215112028 Page 1284 of 1588 215112028 Page 1285 of 1588 215112028 Page 1286 of 1588 215112028 Page 1287 of 1588 215112028 Page 1288 of 1588 215112028 Page 1289 of 1588 215112028 Page 1290 of 1588 215112028 Page 1291 of 1588 215112028 Page 1292 of 1588 215112028 Page 1293 of 1588 215112028 Page 1294 of 1588 215112028 Page 1295 of 1588 215112028 Page 1296 of 1588 215112028 Page 1297 of 1588 215112028 Page 1298 of 1588 215112028 Page 1299 of 1588 215112028 Page 1300 of 1588 215112028 Page 1301 of 1588 215112028 Page 1302 of 1588 215112028 Page 1303 of 1588 215112028 Page 1304 of 1588 215112028 Page 1305 of 1588 215112028 Page 1306 of 1588 215112028 Page 1307 of 1588 215112028 Page 1308 of 1588 215112028 Page 1309 of 1588 215112028 Page 1310 of 1588 215112028 Page 1311 of 1588 215112028 Page 1312 of 1588 215112028 Page 1313 of 1588 215112028 Page 1314 of 1588 215112028 Page 1315 of 1588 215112028 Page 1316 of 1588 215112028 Page 1317 of 1588 215112028 Page 1318 of 1588 215112028 Page 1319 of 1588 215112028 Page 1320 of 1588 215112028 Page 1321 of 1588 215112028 Page 1322 of 1588 215112028 Page 1323 of 1588 215112028 Page 1324 of 1588 215112028 Page 1325 of 1588 215112028 Page 1326 of 1588 215112028 Page 1327 of 1588 215112028 Page 1328 of 1588 215112028 Page 1329 of 1588 215112028 Page 1330 of 1588 215112028 Page 1331 of 1588 215112028 Page 1332 of 1588 215112028 Page 1333 of 1588 215112028 Page 1334 of 1588 215112028 Page 1335 of 1588 215112028 Page 1336 of 1588 215112028 Page 1337 of 1588 215112028 Page 1338 of 1588 215112028 Page 1339 of 1588 215112028 Page 1340 of 1588 215112028 Page 1341 of 1588 215112028 Page 1342 of 1588 215112028 Page 1343 of 1588 215112028 Page 1344 of 1588 215112028 Page 1345 of 1588 215112028 Page 1346 of 1588 215112028 Page 1347 of 1588 215112028 Page 1348 of 1588 215112028 Page 1349 of 1588 215112028 Page 1350 of 1588 215112028 Page 1351 of 1588 215112028 Page 1352 of 1588 215112028 Page 1353 of 1588 215112028 Page 1354 of 1588 215112028 Page 1355 of 1588 215112028 Page 1356 of 1588 215112028 Page 1357 of 1588 215112028 Page 1358 of 1588 215112028 Page 1359 of 1588 215112028 Page 1360 of 1588 215112028 Page 1361 of 1588 215112028 Page 1362 of 1588 215112028 Page 1363 of 1588 215112028 Page 1364 of 1588 215112028 Page 1365 of 1588 215112028 Page 1366 of 1588 215112028 Page 1367 of 1588 215112028 Page 1368 of 1588 215112028 Page 1369 of 1588 215112028 Page 1370 of 1588 215112028 Page 1371 of 1588 215112028 Page 1372 of 1588 215112028 Page 1373 of 1588 215112028 Page 1374 of 1588 215112028 Page 1375 of 1588 215112028 Page 1376 of 1588 215112028 Page 1377 of 1588 215112028 Page 1378 of 1588 215112028 Page 1379 of 1588 215112028 Page 1380 of 1588 215112028 Page 1381 of 1588 215112028 Page 1382 of 1588 215112028 Page 1383 of 1588 215112028 Page 1384 of 1588 215112028 Page 1385 of 1588 215112028 Page 1386 of 1588 215112028 Page 1387 of 1588 215112028 Page 1388 of 1588 215112028 Page 1389 of 1588 215112028 Page 1390 of 1588 215112028 Page 1391 of 1588 215112028 Page 1392 of 1588 215112028 Page 1393 of 1588 215112028 Page 1394 of 1588 215112028 Page 1395 of 1588 215112028 Page 1396 of 1588 215112028 Page 1397 of 1588 215112028 Page 1398 of 1588 215112028 Page 1399 of 1588 215112028 Page 1400 of 1588 215112028 Page 1401 of 1588 215112028 Page 1402 of 1588 215112028 Page 1403 of 1588 215112028 Page 1404 of 1588 215112028 Page 1405 of 1588 215112028 Page 1406 of 1588 215112028 Page 1407 of 1588 215112028 Page 1408 of 1588 215112028 Page 1409 of 1588 215112028 Page 1410 of 1588 215112028 Page 1411 of 1588 215112028 Page 1412 of 1588 215112028 Page 1413 of 1588 215112028 Page 1414 of 1588 215112028 Page 1415 of 1588 215112028 Page 1416 of 1588 215112028 Page 1417 of 1588 215112028 Page 1418 of 1588 215112028 Page 1419 of 1588 215112028 Page 1420 of 1588 215112028 Page 1421 of 1588 215112028 Page 1422 of 1588 215112028 Page 1423 of 1588 215112028 Page 1424 of 1588 215112028 Page 1425 of 1588 215112028 Page 1426 of 1588 215112028 Page 1427 of 1588 215112028 Page 1428 of 1588 215112028 Page 1429 of 1588 215112028 Page 1430 of 1588 215112028 Page 1431 of 1588 215112028 Page 1432 of 1588 215112028 Page 1433 of 1588 215112028 Page 1434 of 1588 215112028 Page 1435 of 1588 215112028 Page 1436 of 1588 215112028 Page 1437 of 1588 215112028 Page 1438 of 1588 215112028 Page 1439 of 1588 215112028 Page 1440 of 1588 215112028 Page 1441 of 1588 215112028 Page 1442 of 1588 215112028 Page 1443 of 1588 215112028 Page 1444 of 1588 215112028 Page 1445 of 1588 215112028 Page 1446 of 1588 215112028 Page 1447 of 1588 215112028 Page 1448 of 1588 215112028 Page 1449 of 1588 215112028 Page 1450 of 1588 215112028 Page 1451 of 1588 215112028 Page 1452 of 1588 215112028 Page 1453 of 1588 215112028 Page 1454 of 1588 215112028 Page 1455 of 1588 215112028 Page 1456 of 1588 215112028 Page 1457 of 1588 215112028 Page 1458 of 1588 215112028 Page 1459 of 1588 215112028 Page 1460 of 1588 215112028 Page 1461 of 1588 215112028 Page 1462 of 1588 215112028 Page 1463 of 1588 215112028 Page 1464 of 1588 215112028 Page 1465 of 1588 215112028 Page 1466 of 1588 215112028 Page 1467 of 1588 215112028 Page 1468 of 1588 215112028 Page 1469 of 1588 215112028 Page 1470 of 1588 215112028 Page 1471 of 1588 215112028 Page 1472 of 1588 215112028 Page 1473 of 1588 215112028 Page 1474 of 1588 215112028 Page 1475 of 1588 215112028 Page 1476 of 1588 215112028 Page 1477 of 1588 215112028 Page 1478 of 1588 215112028 Page 1479 of 1588 215112028 Page 1480 of 1588 215112028 Page 1481 of 1588 215112028 Page 1482 of 1588 215112028 Page 1483 of 1588 215112028 Page 1484 of 1588 215112028 Page 1485 of 1588 215112028 Page 1486 of 1588 215112028 Page 1487 of 1588 215112028 Page 1488 of 1588 215112028 Page 1489 of 1588 215112028 Page 1490 of 1588 215112028 Page 1491 of 1588 215112028 Page 1492 of 1588 215112028 Page 1493 of 1588 215112028 Page 1494 of 1588 215112028 Page 1495 of 1588 215112028 Page 1496 of 1588 215112028 Page 1497 of 1588 215112028 Page 1498 of 1588 215112028 Page 1499 of 1588 215112028 Page 1500 of 1588 215112028 Page 1501 of 1588 215112028 Page 1502 of 1588 215112028 Page 1503 of 1588 215112028 Page 1504 of 1588 215112028 Page 1505 of 1588 215112028 Page 1506 of 1588 215112028 Page 1507 of 1588 215112028 Page 1508 of 1588 215112028 Page 1509 of 1588 215112028 Page 1510 of 1588 215112028 Page 1511 of 1588 215112028 Page 1512 of 1588 215112028 Page 1513 of 1588 215112028 Page 1514 of 1588 215112028 Page 1515 of 1588 215112028 Page 1516 of 1588 215112028 Page 1517 of 1588 215112028 Page 1518 of 1588 215112028 Page 1519 of 1588 215112028 Page 1520 of 1588 215112028 Page 1521 of 1588 215112028 Page 1522 of 1588 215112028 Page 1523 of 1588 215112028 Page 1524 of 1588 215112028 Page 1525 of 1588 215112028 Page 1526 of 1588 215112028 Page 1527 of 1588 215112028 Page 1528 of 1588 215112028 Page 1529 of 1588 215112028 Page 1530 of 1588 215112028 Page 1531 of 1588 215112028 Page 1532 of 1588 215112028 Page 1533 of 1588 215112028 Page 1534 of 1588 215112028 Page 1535 of 1588 215112028 Page 1536 of 1588 215112028 Page 1537 of 1588 215112028 Page 1538 of 1588 215112028 Page 1539 of 1588 215112028 Page 1540 of 1588 215112028 Page 1541 of 1588 215112028 Page 1542 of 1588 215112028 Page 1543 of 1588 215112028 Page 1544 of 1588 215112028 Page 1545 of 1588 215112028 Page 1546 of 1588 215112028 Page 1547 of 1588 215112028 Page 1548 of 1588 215112028 Page 1549 of 1588 215112028 Page 1550 of 1588 215112028 Page 1551 of 1588 215112028 Page 1552 of 1588 215112028 Page 1553 of 1588 215112028 Page 1554 of 1588 215112028 Page 1555 of 1588 215112028 Page 1556 of 1588 215112028 Page 1557 of 1588 215112028 Page 1558 of 1588 215112028 Page 1559 of 1588 215112028 Page 1560 of 1588 215112028 Page 1561 of 1588 215112028 Page 1562 of 1588 215112028 Page 1563 of 1588 215112028 Page 1564 of 1588 215112028 Page 1565 of 1588 215112028 Page 1566 of 1588 215112028 Page 1567 of 1588 215112028 Page 1568 of 1588 215112028 Page 1569 of 1588 215112028 Page 1570 of 1588 215112028 Page 1571 of 1588 215112028 Page 1572 of 1588 215112028 Page 1573 of 1588 215112028 Page 1574 of 1588 215112028 Page 1575 of 1588 215112028 Page 1576 of 1588 215112028 Page 1577 of 1588 215112028 Page 1578 of 1588 215112028 Page 1579 of 1588 215112028 Page 1580 of 1588 215112028 Page 1581 of 1588 215112028 Page 1582 of 1588 215112028 Page 1583 of 1588 215112028 Page 1584 of 1588 215112028 Page 1585 of 1588 215112028 Page 1586 of 1588 215112028 Page 1587 of 1588 215112028 Page 1588 of 1588 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky APPENDIX H INVESTIGATION OF ROCK RUBBLE MATERIAL, ROXANA SITE Appendix H March 2016 H-1 Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for USP and FPC Letcher County, Kentucky (This page intentionally left blank) H-2 Appendix H March 2016 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site Letcher County, Kentucky January 2016 Prepared for: United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street NW Washington, DC 20534 Prepared by: Ronald H. Mullennex, CPG, CGWP Senior Principal, Practice Leader Geology and Hydrogeology Cardno, Inc. 534 Bluefield Industrial Park Bluefield, Virginia 24605 www.cardno.com Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 2 Site Location and Description ............................................................................................. 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3 Location ............................................................................................................................... 2 Topography ......................................................................................................................... 2 General Geology.................................................................................................................. 2 Previous Mining ................................................................................................................... 2 2.4.1 Surface Mining ...................................................................................................... 2 2.4.2 Underground Mining .............................................................................................. 2 Reconnaissance of Existing Water Quality ........................................................................ 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Table 1: 4 Scope and Limitations .......................................................................................................... 1 Field Reconnaissance and Water Sampling ......................................................................... 3 Water Analyses.................................................................................................................... 3 Water Chemistry .................................................................................................................. 4 Historical Site Water Quality ................................................................................................. 4 Summary of November 11, 2015 Water Quality Sampling..................................................... 5 Investigation of Mine Overburden Material to be Handled ............................................... 6 4.1 4.2 4.3 Overburden Distribution ....................................................................................................... 6 Acid-Base Accounting Analyses ........................................................................................... 6 Overburden Material Characterization .................................................................................. 7 5 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................. 7 6 References ........................................................................................................................... 8 Map 1.............................................................................................................................................. Site Index Map Biography of Writer Appendices A ............................................................................................................ Permit No. 867-0298 Documentation B ..........................................................................................................November 11, 2015 Sampling Results C .............................................................................................................................. Stiff and Piper Diagrams D ............................................................................................. Water Quality Reports from 1993-1995 Period E .............................................................................................................. Geologist’s Logs of Drilling Results F ......................................................................................................................Acid-Base Accounting Results January 2016 Cardno, Inc. iii Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons 1 Introduction The Federal Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to construct a new United States Penitentiary (USP), Federal Prison Camp (FPC), and associated ancillary facilities on a property generally known as the “Meade Farm,” near Roxana, Letcher County, Kentucky. Cardno, Inc. is contracted by the Bureau to undertake and/or oversee research and investigations of the subject property to, among other things, develop and support an Environmental Impact Statement as to the proposed development. The subject development is to be located on a former coal surface mine site that has been reclaimed. The existing ground surface at the planned construction site is immediately underlain by up to approximately 17 meters (56 feet) of broken, rubblized rock material residual to the mining operation. That unconsolidated material will generally need to be removed (to allow for the planned site construction) and re-placed in head-ofhollow fills at certain points around the construction site perimeter. Cardno’s Engineering and Environmental Services division (Cardno), mining advisory services group, has investigated the geochemical character of the rock rubble; and evaluated whether its further disturbance, removal, and re-placement is likely to induce material environmental impacts on the site and/or to streams receiving drainage from the site that could have significant bearing on human health due to the geochemical nature of the material. 1.1 Scope and Limitations The focus of this component of the site investigation is to determine whether there is a likelihood of acid mine drainage (to include dissolution of metals of possible health concern) being generated by the handling and replacement of rubblized rock material that is necessary for the planned site development. The investigation was conceived as a phased investigation, with the results of each stage dictating the need for or level of effort to be applied in a following stage. The scope of the commissioned investigation is an initial phase. However, as is discussed herein, the results are consistent and suggest that the investigation performed to date is adequate to serve the intent and purpose of the study. The investigation has involved: 1) sampling and analyses of existing water discharges from the site, most of which reflect water that has drained through the rubble material; and 2) collection, sampling, and analyses of the rubble material itself from multiple subsurface horizons at several locations within the area where construction and development are proposed. Additionally, site water quality information as documented in historical discharge monitoring reports associated with the surface mining permit, provided by the Bureau, has been compared to the recent data generated in this investigation. In performing this investigation, Cardno has relied on information provided by others, including: historical water quality information from mine permit files, provided by the Bureau; a map of the boundary of underground mining provided in a report by Summit Engineering; and mine permit status information set forth in the Kentucky regulatory agency online-searchable database. Cardno has not attempted to verify the accuracy or completeness of such information, and makes no warranty as to such for information not generated by Cardno in this investigation. The scope of investigation completed is consistent with that authorized by the client, and the approach and tasks performed are in accordance with accepted industry standards for the intended purpose. The consistency of results throughout indicate that a more intensive subsurface investigation is unlikely to produce significantly different results. However, no warranty or guarantee can be made as to whether a condition remains undetected by the extent of investigation conducted to date. January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 1 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons 2 Site Location and Description 2.1 Location The Meade Farm site, reportedly consisting of approximately 700 acres, lies on the south side of the North Fork of the Kentucky River near the small community of Roxana, Letcher County, Kentucky. The subject proposed development area is situated on the surface mined and reclaimed ridgecrest surrounded by the drainages of Tolson Branch to the west, North Fork Kentucky River to the north, and Kings Creek to the east. To the south, the subject site is bordered by the continuation of the ridgeline (see Map 1, in pocket following page 8). 2.2 Topography The reclaimed surface mine site lies as a flattened ridgetop plateau at an elevation of approximately 460 meters (m) (1500 feet [ft.]) above mean sea level (msl). To the east, north, and west of the plateau, the mountain slopes drop steeply to the streams situated at elevations of approximately 310 m to 330 m (1000 to 1100 ft.) msl, for a total local topographic relief of 130 m to 150 m (400 to 500 ft.). It is expected that the rubblized rock material that currently mantles the bedrock surface will be excavated to allow the building foundations to be placed on firm bedrock material. The excavated material, as shown on Map 1, is to be placed in head-of-hollow fills situated adjacent to the northwest and southwest of the proposed USP location. (The northwest head-ofhollow contains an existing fill that was constructed during the previous surface mining, but may have additional remaining storage capacity.) 2.3 General Geology Surficial bedrock strata at the proposed building site are of the Breathitt Formation of Pennsylvanian age. These strata consist of clastic sedimentary rocks including, in general, sandstone, siltstone, shale and/or clay shale, and coal beds. Structural dip of the strata is very gently to the northwest at a magnitude of approximately 1.0 percent. 2.4 Previous Mining 2.4.1 Surface Mining The subject site was surface mined by mountaintop mining methods in the late 1980s – early 1990s (Kentucky Department for Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Permanent Program Permit No. 867-0298, issued December 31, 1987, effective date of license of April 29, 1988 – see Appendix A). The site has been fully reclaimed and requires no further monitoring or reporting, based on research of Kentucky Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mine Permits, Surface Mining Information System databases. The permit is identified as having been released in the Division of Mines’ Mine History Report for Cumulative Impact Area assessment (see Appendix A). The surface mining involved the removal of up to about 60 m (200 ft.) of rock overburden to allow recovery of the Fireclay Rider (also known as Hazard No. 4 Rider) coal seam. Rubblized overburden material was re-placed onto the nearly horizontal coal seam pavement after the coal was extracted, and in three head-of-hollow fills located to the northwest, east, and southeast of the proposed facility (see Map 1). The depth of backstacked rubble on the reclaimed mine site ranges from nil to approximately 17 m (56 ft.), based on available exploratory drilling results. 2.4.2 Underground Mining No underground mining is known to have occurred beneath the proposed locations of the USP, FPC, or the associated ancillary facilities. There is one small, long-inactive underground mine, in the Fireclay Rider coal bed, located to the south of the area of previous surface mining and planned subject development (Big Oak Coal Company, Kentucky Permit No. 867-5062). As can be seen on Map 1, the mine horizon is situated at an elevation of approximately 465 m (1525 ft.) above msl, and about 45 m (150 ft.) vertically upslope of the January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 2 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons proposed fill crest. The portal location was visited by Cardno, with the observation that there was no flowing water discharge on the day of the field visit, and no indication of any significant drainage at other times. 3 Reconnaissance of Existing Water Quality The rubblized overburden generated in surface mining of the site in the late 1980s – early 1990s was placed back on top of the extracted coal seam horizon, and into three head-of-hollow fills around the mine perimeter. Infiltrating precipitation percolates through the rubble and concentrates in the bases of the hollow fills, then migrates downslope in the subsurface to discharge at the toes of those fills. That water is in contact with the rock rubble, and its quality upon discharge is an excellent indicator of the geochemical nature of the fill material and of the quality of water that is expected to issue from the material after it has been excavated from the backstack area (the plateau) and re-placed into new or expanded perimeter head-of-hollow fills. Further, the acidity/alkalinity ratio and pH of the water is a principal control upon its ability to dissolve and mobilize “heavy” metals that could be of possible human health concern. As is discussed below in section 3.3, low-pH, acidic water is much more likely to mobilize most metals, while net alkaline, moderate-pH water is not likely to promote such mobilization. As an initial planning step, topographic maps, aerial photographs, and mine maps were reviewed to determine likely or potential locations where flowing water may be sampled as an indicator of site geochemical conditions. Features of note in that review include the three head-of-hollow fills, a fill toe pond at the base of the easterly fill, small stream segments downstream of the planned construction site, and the surface drift entry of the abandoned underground mine. 3.1 Field Reconnaissance and Water Sampling Site hydrogeologic reconnaissance was conducted by a Cardno geologist on November 11, 2015. Water samples were collected from the toe discharges of each of the three hollow fills, the mouths of the two small streams flowing westerly from the site (one of which is below a hollow fill, and one of which does not have an upstream fill), and the eastern fill discharge after it has passed through the toe pond (see Map 1). The old underground mine portal was visited and confirmed to exhibit no surface discharge. At each of the six sampling points, field measurements were recorded as to water temperature, pH, and conductivity. Samples were collected in four containers for each sample, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory on November 13, 2015. 3.2 Water Analyses The collected samples were transported to the main laboratory of Research Environmental & Industrial Consultants, Inc. (REIC), at Beaver, West Virginia, for analyses of general chemistry and metals. Specifically, the analytes and laboratory methods used were: Analysis Anions by Ion Chromatography Dissolved Metals by ICP Total Metals by ICP Dissolved Mercury Total Dissolved Solids Total Suspended Solids Acidity Alkalinity pH January 2016 Analytes chlorides, sulfate antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, calcium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, potassium, selenium, sodium, thallium chromium, iron, manganese mercury TDS TSS total acidity total alkalinity (as CaCO3) pH Cardno, Inc. Method EPA 300.0, Rev. 2.1 EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4 EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4 EPA 245.1, Rev. 3.0 SM2540 C-1997 SM2540 D-1997 SM2310 B-1997 SM2320 B-1997 SM4500-H+-B-2000 3 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons Results of analyses are incorporated in Appendix B and discussed below. 3.3 Water Chemistry Excavation and rubblization of rock strata has the potential to expose relatively fresh, unweathered rock to air (oxygen) and water, accelerating the weathering process by which rock minerals are dissolved and leached from the rock. Breaking of the rock also increases the surface area potentially exposed to air and water. Water infiltrating and passing through the rubblized rock transports dissolved mineral constituents, so that chemical analysis of that water is an indicator of the mineral composition of the broken rock strata. Oxidation of sulfidic minerals produces acidic, sulfate-enriched (SO4) drainage. In the absence of acidneutralization (alkalinity), the drainage tends to exhibit a low pH value1, and most metals are more soluble at lower, as opposed to higher, pH values. Where minerals containing substantial acid-neutralizing constituents are present (principally calcium [Ca] and magnesium [Mg] carbonate minerals, in the subject strata), the acidic drainage may be fully neutralized, resulting in pH values in the desirable 6 to 9 range. At that pH range, most metals exhibit a markedly lower solubility than they do at pH values below that range. All of the waters flowing from the site are of a Mg-Ca-SO4 ionic facies, with elevated concentrations of magnesium, calcium, and sulfate, and with substantial net alkalinity (see Stiff and Piper diagrams, Appendix C). All show influence of weathering of both sulfide and alkaline-rich minerals, such that any acid production has been completely neutralized by calcareous or carbonate minerals. These characteristics and the associated total dissolved solids (TDS) levels are likely representative of virtually all hollow fill discharges in the region as a whole. The analyses results indicate there to be no concentrations of metals at levels of human health concern in water that has migrated through the rubblized rock material. While the water exhibits elevated sulfate and total dissolved solids concentrations (and consequent elevated conductivity) reflective of oxidation and dissolution of sulfidic minerals in the rock, it also contains net alkalinity with dissolved calcium and magnesium that, again, reflect dissolution of acid-neutralizing minerals. Acidity generated by oxidation of sulfidic minerals has been, in all cases, fully neutralized. The resulting water quality exhibits net alkalinity, pH values in the range of 6.73 to 8.11, and extremely low to non-detectable concentrations of metals of potential human health concern in occupancy of the site. Parameters that are often indicators of impacts from gas or oil well drilling (that is, reflective of deep saline waters) such as sodium, chloride, and barium are of quite low concentrations in the site discharges, indicating no impact in that regard from the existing gas wells that occur within the site (see Table 1 on page 5). As is discussed further below, re-handling of the site overburden materials is likely to result in no significant change in the chemistry of water draining from the site. 3.4 Historical Site Water Quality Mining permit-related historical water quality reports from the 1993-1995 period show results consistent with those of the recent sampling; that is, the waters exhibit net alkalinity, moderate pH values (6.34 – 8.17), and low iron and manganese, indicating likely low dissolved metals concentrations in general. (The data are enclosed in Appendix D, but specific sampling locations are undetermined.) 1 The pH value reflects the hydrogen ion activity level in a solution. It is expressed as the negative logarithm of that activity, such that the lower the pH value, the higher the hydrogen ion activity level. The pH scale typically ranges from 0 to 14, and 7 is neutral (the point where hydrogen ion (H +) activity and hydroxyl ion (OH-) activity are in balance). Water quality standards typically reference a desired pH range of 6 to 9 (a common natural range) although normal rainwater is generally in the range of approximately 5 to 5.5 pH. January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 4 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons Summary of Water Quality November 11, 2015 Sampling Table 1 Parameter Field Temp Units ºF Field Conductivity µmhos/cm Field pH Lab pH East Hollow Fill East Southwest Northwest Northwest Southeast Below Hollow Fill Hollow Fill Stream Toe Of Stream Pond Toe Toe Mouth Hollow Fill Mouth 50.8 54.1 54.5 54.9 55.4 55.9 711 1,831 1,505 1,211 1,900 1,675 su 6.73 7.05 8.11 7.75 7.90 7.97 su 7.22 7.41 8.31 7.89 8.09 8.23 Chromium mg/L <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 Iron mg/L 0.0503 0.0854 <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 Manganese mg/L 0.0162 0.0740 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0061 0.0350 Chloride mg/L <0.20 3.95 2.34 1.93 3.02 2.26 Sulfate mg/L 316 1,210 794 763 1,310 1,030 Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 521 2,230 1,450 1,300 2,260 1,820 Total Suspended Solids mg/L <1 2 1 3 1 1 Total Acidity mg/L 10.9 32.9 <1.0 11 <1.0 <1.0 Total Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3 51.1 377 215 191 308 270 Dissolved Antimony mg/L <0.0080 <0.0080 <0.0080 <0.0080 <0.0080 <0.0080 Dissolved Arsenic mg/L <0.0070 <0.0070 <0.0070 <0.0070 <0.0070 <0.0070 Dissolved Barium mg/L 0.0618 0.0335 0.0581 0.0373 0.0217 0.0277 Dissolved Beryllium mg/L <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 Dissolved Cadmium mg/L <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 Dissolved Calcium mg/L 63.5 259 181 155 250 207 Dissolved Chromium mg/L <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 Dissolved Copper mg/L <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dissolved Iron mg/L <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 Dissolved Lead mg/L <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 Dissolved Magnesium mg/L 54.7 234 178 153 238 216 Dissolved Manganese mg/L 0.0161 0.0502 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0064 0.0293 Dissolved Potassium mg/L 3.42 13.2 9.14 8.87 16.4 14.3 Dissolved Selenium mg/L <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 Dissolved Sodium mg/L 8.73 24.1 20.3 17.3 32.5 25.7 Dissolved Thallium mg/L <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 Dissolved Mercury mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 5 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons 4 Investigation of Mine Overburden Material to be Handled Six exploratory borehole drilling locations were specified by the Bureau (see Map 1). Drilling was conducted by Central Star Drilling, Inc., of Peebles, Ohio, using hollow-stem auger (HSA) and continuous split-spoon (SPT) sample collection techniques, under the supervision of a Cardno geologist. The geologist’s logs of drilling results are enclosed in Appendix E. The rubblized overburden is a mixture of clay shale, siltstone, and sandstone. In each of the six boreholes, auger refusal was encountered a few meters beneath the apparent base of the rubblized backstack material, in weathered sandstone that appears to be representative of the uppermost bedrock surface. A total of 45 samples were collected from the six borings. Sample selections were made by the geologist with the intent of achieving fair representation of the rubblized material and weathered bedrock that would or may be excavated and re-placed into a fill. 4.1 Overburden Distribution As is shown on Map 1, two borehole locations (Nos. 3 and 4) are within the central part of the site where the USP would be built. They encountered approximately 12 and 16 m (39 and 52 ft.) of rubble material, and extended into apparent weathered bedrock for another 2 to 5 m (6 to 16 ft.). Two boreholes (Nos. 5 and 6) located at the southern end of the site (general vicinity of the proposed central utility plant and outside warehouse) encountered about 13 to 17 m (43 to 56 ft.) of rubble and another 2 to 6 m (6 to 20 ft.) of apparent weathered bedrock. The two boreholes (Nos. 1 and 2) located on the northern point of the ridgeline (proposed FPC area) revealed no significant distribution of backstacked rubble there, and auger refusal was reached in weathered sandstone at depths of 3 and 4 m (10 and 13 ft.) below the ground surface. 4.2 Acid-Base Accounting Analyses The 45 selected samples were delivered to Appalachian Laboratories, Inc., of Beckley, West Virginia, for acidbase accounting (ABA) analyses. ABA (EPA 600/2-78-054) is essentially a screening test designed to determine the relative proclivity for a material to produce either acidic or alkaline drainage, based on the potentially acid-generating and acid-neutralizing minerals present in the materials. Acid generation in rocks of the subject area is due to oxidation of sulfidic minerals (most commonly pyrite) that releases acidity (hydronium ion, H+) and sulfate. Sulfur in the rock may occur as sulfate or as organic sulfur, but these forms do not produce acidity. It is common practice to perform a “total sulfur” analysis as the basis for an initial estimate (calculation) of the potential acid-generating capability of the material, and conduct further analysis of sulfur forms only where substantial acidity generation is suggested. This utilization of total sulfur as the basis for estimation overstates the actual acid-generating potential, and is thus conservative from the standpoint of identifying material that may produce more acidity than will be offset by its own neutralization potential. The other principal component of ABA is the determination of acid-neutralizing potential. The majority of neutralizing potential (NP) is provided by calcium and/or magnesium carbonate minerals present in the rocks, although aluminosilicate minerals may also contribute to a typically small degree. Material that contains a greater acid-generating than neutralizing potential is considered to be likely to produce acid drainage upon weathering, and low pH values resulting from the acidity favors the dissolution and mobility of many “heavy” metals during the weathering process. Conversely, material with more neutralizing than acidgenerating potential is likely to produce neutral or somewhat alkaline drainage, which is not conducive to mobilization of those metals. In addition to the determination of acid-producing versus acid-neutralizing potential, the ABA test procedures normally include quantification of the material color (a potential indicator of oxidation-reduction geochemical January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 6 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons conditions affecting the mineralogy of the material), a fizz (effervescence) rating (indicative of the degree and type of carbonate minerals present), and paste pH (indicative of the immediate tendency for acid or alkaline conditions to be formed). Results of the ABA testing are enclosed in Appendix F and are discussed below. 4.3 Overburden Material Characterization Results of the ABA testing show all of the sampled material to be quite low in sulfur content with very low potential to generate acidic drainage. Most of the material also exhibits only a mild neutralization potential (NP), and appears to be generally well-weathered material with relatively little remaining reactivity. There are a few scattered zones with greater than 2% total NP (as CaCO3), but none exceed 3% NP. Most exhibit total NP in the range of 0.6 to 1.5%, with net NP (NP less acid-generating potential) of 0.3 to 1.0%. It is concluded that the material that may be excavated and re-placed is weathered, low-reactivity material with a consistent excess net neutralization potential in all samples. It would be expected to produce net alkaline drainage of circumneutral pH, similar to that currently discharging from the site. Based on both the water analyses and the ABA test results, there are no zones that require special handling, and there is very low potential for mobilization of metals of any concern to either human health or aquatic environments. 5 Summary and Conclusions The proposed construction activities will entail excavation of rubblized rock overburden associated with previous surface mining, and placement of that material into new or expanded existing head-of-hollow fills. Some small amounts of weathered bedrock material may also be included in such handling. Investigation of the material shows it to be of low reactivity geochemically, exhibiting more acid-neutralizing potential than acid-generating potential (which is extremely low), and posing no significant risk of producing acidic drainage or drainage with significant levels of dissolved metals of concern as to human health in occupancy of the site. The existing water chemistry in discharges from the fill structures is consistent with the findings of the subsurface materials investigation. The total dissolved solids contents of that drainage are elevated, reflecting the high degree of weathering that has occurred since mining and the continued flushing out of weatheringproduced dissolved components, but the drainage is essentially devoid of heavy metal or trace metal components. The character of current drainage is similar to that which existed upon completion of mining, and that condition is not likely to be significantly changed by the excavation and the proposed site development to take place. Although it was beyond the stated scope of investigation, it is noted that the current water chemistry indicates that there is no significant or detectable impact from deep saline waters that may have been encountered in installation of the gas wells that are present at the subject site. (Natural water present at depths commonly associated with gas well installations in the subject area is saline, with very high [relative to surficial or shallow groundwater] concentrations of sodium, chloride, and often barium. Those elements are not enriched in the current water discharges from the site.) January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 7 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons 6 References > Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Letcher County, Kentucky, Federal Bureau of Prisons, February 2015. > Preliminary Engineering Report, Addendum #1: Report Update, prepared by Summit Engineering, Inc., for Letcher County Planning Commission. > Geotechnical drilling logs, drilling performed in August-September 2011, prepared by Marshall Miller & Associates. > Kentucky Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mine Permits, Surface Mining Information System. > Kentucky Division of Mine Permits (2011, July 14); Kings Creek – North Fork Kentucky River, Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessment (HUC12:051002010105). Retrieved from: http://eec.ky.gov/SearchCenter/Results.aspx?k=867-0298. > Geologic Map of the Roxana Quadrangle, Edward K. Maughan, US Geological Survey, 1976. January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 8 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons Roxana Prison Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Map January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 9 Site Index Map DISCLAIMER: This map should not be used for mapping purposes or requirements under local, state, provincial or federal laws, regulations, or programs governing mine safety or environmental protection. This map was prepared solely to assess coal reserves and resources and is based on information provided by others except as otherwise noted. Cardno has not surveyed the locations of mining, exploration holes, gas well, property control, permit boundaries, roads, or buildings shown on the map and does not warrant or otherwise certify the location of such mining (or absence thereof), or the other features depicted hereon. BH-1-15 NW Stream Mouth BH-2-15 NW Toe of Hollow Fill BH-3-15 East Hollow Fill Toe East Hollow Fill Below Pond (Pond Discharge) BH-4-15 SE Hollow Fill Toe BH-5-15 BH-6-15 SW Stream Mouth No Flow at Old Mine Adit Big Oak Coal Co. Mine No. 2 Fireclay Rider Seam Detail Undocumented Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons Roxana Prison Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Biography of Writer January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 10 Ronald H. Mullennex Current Position CPG, CGWP, Senior Principal, Practice Leader – Geology and Hydrogeology Profession Professional Geologist, Certified Ground Water Professional Years' Experience 40 Joined Cardno 1977 Education MS – Geology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV BS – Geology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV Professional Registrations CPG CGWP PG – VA, SC, TN, PA, KY, NC, GA LRS – WV WVDEP Approved Person for preparing, signing and certifying surface mine permit applications Competent Person for coal resource determination under JORC Code www.cardno.com www.cardno.com Summary of Experience Mr. Mullennex is a Certified Professional Geologist and Certified Ground Water Professional with over 40 years’ professional experience in resource and mining geology, hydrogeology, environmental issues, and engineering applications. At Cardno, he directs geological and hydrogeological investigations, prepares and presents reports, and is frequently called upon in expert witness capacities in litigation concerning geological or hydrologic matters. He has authored a wide range of technical articles on coal resources, mining and mine drainage issues, groundwater and hydrogeology, environmental remediation, and geochemistry issues. He has also authored over 1,400 professional reports to clients in his consulting career. A principal focus of his work in recent years has involved mineral resource evaluations and groundwater investigations in association with mineral extraction activities. Such groundwater studies include assessments of probable hydrologic consequences of mining; determination of existing and baseline hydrogeologic conditions; evaluation of hydrogeologic, geochemical, and geotechnical conditions and their potential impact on mining activities; and investigations of water quality and/or quantity impacts resulting from past mining or gas well drilling/operation. In mineral resource studies, his work has focused on resource distribution and classification, geologic factors affecting mineability and accessibility, and coal and tailings quality. Mr. Mullennex earned Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees in Geology from West Virginia University in 1971 and 1975, respectively. He serves on the Visiting Committee for the Department of Geology and Geography at West Virginia University, and on the external advisory board for WVU’s Advanced Energy Initiative. He holds certification, licensing, and/or registration as a professional geologist in seven states, and is a Licensed Remediation Specialist under West Virginia’s Voluntary Remediation Program. He is a Competent Person in coal resource determination under the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Resources (JORC Code). Affiliations American Institute of Professional Geologists Geological Society of America, Coal Geology and Hydrogeology Divisions Society of Mining Engineers of Association of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers Sigma Gamma Epsilon (Earth Sciences Honorary Fraternity) Association of Ground Water Scientists and Engineers, Division of National Ground Water Association Association of Engineering Geologists American Society of Mining and Reclamation International Mine Water Association RONALD H. MULLENNEX Page 1 of 8 Significant Projects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.cardno.com Explore and evaluate geologic, hydrogeologic, and geochemical issues pertaining to large coal exploration, mine planning, and Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) in virgin area of Western Australia, including water supply, mine inflow, water quality, and materials handling investigations, and delineation and assessment of resources and classification under JORC. Joint coordinator and principal investigator in compilation of environmental audit for World Bank affiliate, for large mining project in the People’s Republic of China. Expert Witness in litigation and regulatory administrative proceedings. Qualified as expert in hydrogeology, geology, hydrology, water quality, and geomorphology. Evaluate sources, extent, and nature of impact of selenium leaching from mine disturbances into receiving streams and develop mitigation through water management and enhanced passive reduction-adsorption processes. Site characterization, monitoring, and implementation of enhanced bioattenuation remediation program in fractured bedrock aquifer. Hydrogeologic investigations of potential hydrologic consequences (PHC) by mining operations (numerous studies, some involving large areas). Hydrogeologic and geotechnical evaluations of conditions to be encountered, potential hydrologic impacts, and design of preventive measures for advancement of underground mines beneath stream valleys (numerous studies). Investigated and served as expert in litigations concerning natural flow, transference, and water chemistry of brackish and saline waters from deep underground mine. Water chemistry and contaminants investigations of alleged impacts to groundwater by gas well drilling and/or operations. Investigations and assessments of causative and contributory factors regarding landslides, subsidence, and flooding events, including geomorphological analysis of features. Hydrogeologic investigation and development of during-construction monitoring and preventive action to prevent adverse grout migration through the aquifer during mine shaft pre-grouting and construction project. Assessment of potential impact of high-extraction underground mining upon stream conditions, and worked with mine design engineering personnel to devise alternative mine plan to avoid impact to stream. Investigation of acid-producing rock materials and acid drainage for large highway construction program, and work with design engineers to develop materials handling plans, drainage structures and treatment plans. Hydrogeologic and geotechnical investigation of large pre–Subtitle D landfill located in karstic terrain to evaluate impact on environment and develop plans for closure. Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study of a state superfund office site, involving ground water impact by dissolved trichloroethane and related compounds in fractured bedrock aquifer. Coordinated and critiqued baseline risk assessment. Served on Tazewell County, Virginia, Comprehensive Plan Committee, assessing karst impacts and ground water concerns for land use planning. Developed numerous Subtitle D landfill groundwater monitoring programs for solid waste and CDD facilities, and managed the implemented programs; to include sampling, analyses, data evaluation, and reporting. Development of landfill gas migration mitigation measures at sites complicated by karstic conditions and by underground mine workings. RONALD H. MULLENNEX Page 2 of 8 Significant Projects (Continued) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.cardno.com Utilized ground water modeling to design extraction/injection system for aquifer remediation. Hydrogeologic assessment, aquifer testing, groundwater modeling, and expert witness testimony concerning DNAPL–related contaminants in bedrock aquifer. Hydrogeologic investigation of impact of abandoned underground coal mine on adjacent stream and residential water supplies; developed successful remedial plan, and monitored results. Investigation of impacts to hydrologic regime resulting from underground mining in areas beneath stream valleys. Investigation and delineation of impacts and design inadequacies of several solid waste landfills for closure design. Led design team of geologists, hydrogeologists, and engineers in completing closure designs, and acted as Principal Investigator in the investigation and design phases. Served as Principal–in–Charge of Construction Quality Assurance/Quality Control and field inspection for landfill closure construction projects. Hydrogeologic investigation and litigation support in alleged salt impact to shallow groundwater. Supervision and peer review of numerous investigative reports involving leaking underground storage tanks and similar contaminant releases to ground water. Detailed investigation of geologic factors controlling or influencing coal resource distribution and development potential, with analysis of potential hazards to be encountered in longwall mining. Detailed depositional analysis and interpretation of coal resource distribution and factors impacting future development. Regional investigation and exploration of deep coals. Stratigraphic analysis and interpretation of depositional patterns responsible for producing extreme hazardous conditions encountered in mining. Exploration and delineation of coal resources; prediction of mine roof hazard areas. Exploration and delineation of stone resources and stone geochemical characteristics. Detailed investigation and interpretation of small–scale depositional features impacting coal reserve development. Study and interpretation of paleogeographic and depositional conditions controlling resource distribution in several different coal seams. Geologic investigation and expert witness for properties and mining ventures involved in prosecution in Federal court. Management of active oil and gas leaseholds. Evaluations of oil and gas estates involved in condemnation. Reserve and economic development feasibility evaluation of several thousand acres in widely scattered tracts. Served as expert witness in civil proceedings in Federal Tax Court, with beneficial results to client. Mapping, investigation, and evaluation of geologic, hydrogeologic, and geomorphic features relevant to new highway construction. RONALD H. MULLENNEX Page 3 of 8 Significant Projects (Continued) > > > > > > > > > > Investigation of ground water contamination susceptibility of a regional area involving largely karstic limestone and dolomite bedrock, incorporating assessment of multiple geologic and cultural components to delineate relative hazard potential at any point within the area. Study involved evaluation of stratigraphy and lithologic factors, structural geology, soil types, remote sensing analysis of fracture systems, water table levels, ground water flow directions, recharge and discharge areas and points, and investigation of ground water communication between wells. Results used for determining relative need for sewerage construction at different points within study area. Investigation of karst sinkhole subsidence and triggering mechanisms, pertaining to damage to existing structures. Utilization of geologic evaluation and remote sensing analysis to locate high–yield water wells for municipalities and industries. Consultation to an engineering firm regarding dye–tracing applications to define ground water flow characteristics. Determination of karstic controls on ground water in evaluation of suitability of construction site. Conducting geologic evaluations and remote sensing analyses, and integrating these studies to define potential ground water flow characteristics that may impact underground mining. Supervision and analysis of packer testing techniques to determine permeability of formations in boreholes. Utilization of geophysical logs to identify ground water flow characteristics encountered in boreholes and select optimum horizons for piezometer installation. Utilization of geophysical logs and analytical data to define geochemical characteristics of rock and coal strata. Site evaluation of a planned large commercial landfill facility encompassing in excess of 500 acres. Acted as project manager for field activities including planning and executing of 58–borehole geologic and hydrogeologic exploration program; access road construction in very rugged terrain, with associated sediment and erosion control; and installation of single and nested piezometers and monitoring well construction. Performed analysis of geologic, geophysical, and hydrogeologic data to evaluate suitability of site, and determined post–construction monitoring requirements in relatively complex hydrogeologic setting. Acted as primary coordinator for report and permit application preparation, incorporating investigative reports from other consultants into a comprehensive permit application package. Professional History 2014 - Present Senior Principal, Practice Leader – Geology and Hydrogeology Cardno, Inc. – Bluefield, Virginia (USA) Responsible for office management and administration; project management, coordination, and supervision; and project reporting and presentation. Is Cardno’s corporate officer member of the Radiation Safety Committee and provides management oversight of the company’s geophysical logging division. www.cardno.com RONALD H. MULLENNEX Page 4 of 8 1979 - 2014 Senior Vice President Cardno, Inc. (formerly Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc.) – Bluefield, Virginia (USA) Responsible for office management and administration; project management, coordination, and supervision; and project reporting and presentation. Provided management oversight of drilling services division for several years. Projects involve all phases of geologic application to coal exploration, evaluation, and development in the United States and abroad; quarry stone resources and stone quality; construction and environmental site characterization; ground water and surface water investigations; investigation of mining and hydrogeologic considerations in the United States and abroad; underground injection permitting and impact assessment; and writing of technical reports. Specific experience includes coal and geologic mapping; mineral property evaluation; management and supervision of exploration programs; study of geologic factors in resource minability (geologic hazards, depositional analyses); initiation and utilization of stratigraphic and depositional environmental studies as applied to exploration and development; ground water availability, contamination, and monitoring studies; investigation of karst impacts on environmental considerations; utilization of remote sensing techniques, including lineament and fracture analyses; development of ground water monitoring strategies and systems for solid waste landfill facilities; assessment of monitoring data to determine impacts; coordination of full site investigation and remedial design teams for landfill closures and sites impacted by volatile organic compound contaminants in ground water; investigations of hydrologic impacts resulting from mining; risk assessment and development of remediation designs for ground water contamination; development of mitigative measures for landfill gas migration; geomorphic evaluations of flooding and earth movement issues, and serving as expert witness in cases concerning mineral properties, ground water, and flood analysis. 1977 - 1979 Project Geologist Geological Consulting Services, Inc. – Bluefield, Virginia (USA) Responsible for field and in–office project management, coordination, and supervision. Projects involved primarily coal property exploration and evaluation. 1974 - 1977 Coal Geologist, West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey West Virginia Geological Survey – Morgantown, West Virginia (USA) Responsible for mapping, data collection, and correlation of coals in regional study of coal resources and development potential. Publications & Presentations > > www.cardno.com “Selenium – Sources and Considerations for Treatment or Prevention” Wastewater Treatment and Water Quality for Indiana Coal Mines Workshop, 26th Annual Surface Mined Land Reclamation Technology Transfer Seminar, Jasper, Indiana, December 9, 2013. “A Cost-Effective Approach to In Situ Bioremediation in Fractured Bedrock,” The Ninth International In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium, Baltimore, Maryland, May 7-10, 2007. RONALD H. MULLENNEX Page 5 of 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.cardno.com “Stratigraphic Distribution of Selenium in Upper Kanawha-Lower Allegheny Formation Strata at a Location in Southwestern West Virginia,” 22nd Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, September 14, 2005. “The Floods of July 8, 2001: A Review of Characteristics, Distribution and Contributing Factors,” Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research and the Central Appalachian Section of SME, Abingdon, Virginia, April 2002. "Subsidence Impacts on Ground Water," Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research and the Central Appalachian Section of SME, Abingdon, Virginia, June 2000. “Recognition of Paleosols From Wireline Logs,” Predictive Stratigraphic Analysis Workshop, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, April 1996. “Mitigation of Environmental Impacts Resulting From Mine Pool Build–up,” Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium, Morgantown, West Virginia, April 1996. “Integration of Hydrogeologic and Geophysical Techniques for Identification of AMD Seepage and Remedial Design,” R.H. Mullennex, C.P.G., C.G.W.P., V.P. Wiram, C.P.G., H.E. Naumann, P.E., Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium, Morgantown, West Virginia, April 1995. “Remedial Measures,” Business and the Environment Seminar, Bluefield, West Virginia, July 1993. “Hydrogeology of the Appalachian Plateau,” Ground Water Hydrology, Contamination and Management: Wellhead Protection in the Appalachian Plateau, USEPA and Cook College of Continuing Education, National Mine Safety and Health Academy, Beckley, West Virginia, June 1993. “Remedial Measures: Planning and Managing Closure and Post Closure Activities at your Sanitary Landfill,” Business and the Environment Seminar, Bluefield, Virginia, 1993. “Downhole Camera Brings Visible Benefits to Ground Water Monitoring,” World Wastes, Vol. 35, No. 12, December 1992. “Ground Water Monitoring at Sanitary Landfills – Sampling and Analysis Considerations Under Subtitle D,” World Wastes, Vol. 35, No. 6, June 1992. “Ground Water Monitoring at Sanitary Landfills – System Design Considerations Under Subtitle D,” World Wastes, Vol. 35, No. 2, February 1992. “Water–Bearing Fracture Identification Through High–Resolution Density Logging Techniques,” presented at National Water Well Association Exposition Forum on Ground Water Technologies for the 1990's, October 23, 1991, Washington, D.C. “Ground Water Issues,” Business and the Environment Seminar, Bluefield, Virginia, 1991. “Geological and Environmental Impact on Development and Construction in Our Area,” Business and the Environment Seminar, Bluefield, Virginia, 1991. “Preparing for an Environmentally Safe Landfill,” Business and the Environment Seminar, Bluefield, Virginia, 1991. “Lithologic Indicators of Geochemical Conditions of Sedimentation in Pennsylvanian Age Rocks of the Appalachian Basin,” C. Blaine Cecil, U.S.G.S.; Ronald W. Stanton, U.S.G.S.; and Ronald H. Mullennex, Geological Consulting Services, Inc.; American Association of Petroleum Geologists Symposium, Charleston, West Virginia, September 1988. “Geological Modeling Techniques for Evaluation of Productivity–Related Longwall Mining Roof Conditions: A Case Study,” Longwall U.S.A. Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, co–author, September 1988. RONALD H. MULLENNEX Page 6 of 8 > > > > > Continuing Education > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.cardno.com “Prediction of Coal Continuity, Quality, and Mining Conditions as Afforded by Depositional Analysis,” Society of Mining Engineers of AIME, Fall Meeting, St. Louis Missouri, 1986. “Use of Depositional Models and Stratigraphic Mapping Techniques to Determine New Coal Reserve Potentials in the Appalachian Region,” AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, published in Transactions, the permanent technical literature of the Society of Mining Engineers of AIME February 1981. “No. 3 Pocahontas Coal in Southern West Virginia – Resources and Depositional Trends,” West Virginia Geological Survey Bulletin B–38, co–author 1981. “Case Histories and Depositional Modeling for Classifying Reserves in the Appalachian Region,” Miller, M. S., and Mullennex, R. H., American Association of Petroleum Geologists Meeting, Morgantown, West Virginia, October 1980. “Major Cross–Strike Structures of the Central Sedimentary Appalachians,” Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science, Vol. 46, No. 2. , 1974. Passive Treatments for Sulfate and Metals in Mine Water, American Society of Mining and Reclamation Conference, June 8, 2015, Lexington, Kentucky. West Virginia Surface Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium, Morgantown, West Virginia (Annually). Environmental Considerations in Energy Production, Society of Mining Engineers/Virginia Center for Coal & Energy Research, Virginia Tech, April 14-18, 2013. Landfill Leachate and Gases, Midwest Geosciences Group, February 5, 2013. Calculation and Use of Time of Concentration, American Society of Civil Engineers, December 20, 2012. Wastewater Treatment and Water Quality for Indiana Coal Mines Workshop, 26th Annual Surface Mined Land Reclamation Technology Transfer Workshop, Jasper, Indiana, December 9, 2013. Applications of Groundwater Geochemistry, National Ground Water Association, Nashville, Tennessee, October 17-18, 2011. Ground Water Geochemistry and Isotopes, National Ground Water Association Web Seminar, November 17, 2009. Pump/Yield Testing Design and Transducer Data Collection, National Ground Water Association Web Seminar, April 7, 2009. Geologic Sequestration Research Activities and EPA Requirements, Air & Waste Management Association Web Seminar, February 18, 2009. Environmental Geochemistry of Metals: Investigation and Remediation, National Ground Water Association, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 13 – 15, 2007. Basics of Natural Stream Design on Mined Lands, American Society for Mining and Reclamation/West Virginia Surface Mine Drainage Task Force, April 18-22, 2004. Regional Coalfield Water Resource Symposium, Virginia Water Resource Research Center and Virginia Tech, Wise, Virginia, September 4, 2002. Environmental Remediation in Coal Mining, Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research and the Central Appalachian Section of SME, Abingdon, Virginia, June 8, 2000. Low–Cost Remediation Strategies for Contaminated Soil and Ground Water, National Ground Water Association, Baltimore, Maryland, June 1–2, 1998. RONALD H. MULLENNEX Page 7 of 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.cardno.com Defining Coalbed Methane Exploration Fairways and Resources, 1997 International Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, May 1997. Advanced Applications of Borehole Geophysics to Hydrogeological Investigations, National Ground Water Association, Natick, MA, October 3, 1995. Capture Zone Analysis Techniques Applied to Ground Water Protection and Remediation, Environmental Education Enterprises, Columbus, Ohio, June 1993. Analysis and Design of Aquifer Tests, National Ground Water Association, Columbus, Ohio, March 1992. Selection and Analysis of Shallow Aquifer Tests, Association of Engineering Geologists, Chicago, Illinois, September 30, 1991. Remote Sensing Applications to Hydrogeology, National Water Well Association, 1988. Borehole Geophysics: Applications to Hydrogeology, National Water Well Association, 1988. Modeling Ground water Flow in an Aquifer, University of Kentucky, Institute of Mining and Minerals Research, 1988. Expert Witness Short Course, National Water Well Association, 1987. Ground Water Monitoring in Karst Terrains, National Water Well Association, 1987. Ground Water Monitoring Principles and Sampling Techniques, University of Kentucky, Institute of Mining and Minerals Research, 1986. Applied Hydrology and Sedimentology for Disturbed Areas, University of Kentucky, Institute of Mining and Minerals Research, 1985. Economic Evaluation and Investment Decision Methods, Colorado School of Mines, 1984. Roof Control and Pillar Design, University of Kentucky, Institute of Mining and Minerals Research, 1983. Technical Communications, Colorado School of Mines, 1981. Handling, Preparation, and Use of Coal, American Coal Testing Institute, 1980. RONALD H. MULLENNEX Page 8 of 8 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons Roxana Prison Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix A PERMIT NO. 867-0298 DOCUMENTATION January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 11 source: http://eec.ky.gov/SearchCenter/Results.aspx?k=867-0298 See Section 6, References Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessement Mine History Report for Cumulative Impact Area Kings Creek-North Fork Kentucky River CIA Acreage: 18,612.00 HUC12: 051002010105 Date of Report: 7/14/2011 Status Active Permit # Company Name Acreages Status Mine Types Seams Permitted Disturbed 8670393 NALLY & HAMILTON ENTERPRISES INC A2 SM SC SG HAZARD 5A, HAZARD 4A, HAZARD 4 RIDER, HADDIX 657.03 575 8670444 ENTERPRISE MINING COMPANY LLC A2 SC SG UG HAZARD NO 4 RIDER, HAZARD NO 4 601.25 45 8670445 ENTERPRISE MINING COMPANY LLC A2 SC SG UG HAZARD 4 RIDER 1295.83 50 8670461 FLEENOR, INC AP SR SC UG SG FIRECLAY HAZARD 4, FIRECLAY RIDGER HAZARD 4 RIDER, WHITESBURG, U AMBURGY 2, L AMBURGY 1 476.6 50 8670503 BSD1 LLC ND SC SG SR HAZARD 4, HAZARD 4R 34.4 0 8675268 ENTERPRISE MINING COMPANY LLC AP UG SR SA SG HAZARD NO4 RIDER, HAZARD NO4 957.8 52 8675270 ENTERPRISE MINING COMPANY LLC A1 UG SG SA SC SR FIRECLAY 303.69 84 8675312 SAPPHIRE COAL COMPANY AP UG SR ELKHORN 3, 8677024 ENTERPRISE MINING COMPANY LLC A1 HR XXXX 8678051 ENTERPRISE MINING COMPANY LLC A1 PP RD SC SG SS FIRE CLAY, FIRE CLAY RIDER 8678052 ENTERPRISE MINING COMPANY LLC A1 PP XXXX Released Permit # Company Name 0 29.86 20 230.98 150 26 25 Acreages Status Mine Types Seams 0260090 ROCK GAP COAL CO FF CM MANCHESTER 0670020 GOLDEN OAK MINING CO INC RC CM HAZARD NUMBER 4 0670105 RICHARD ISON RC SG 0675048 LAKE COAL CO INC RC 0675099 LAKE COAL CO INC RC 0675106 LAKE COAL CO INC RC UG HAZARD NO 4 2670340 LAKE COAL CO INC RC UG HZ NO 4 2675021 SOUTH-EAST COAL COMPANY RC UG ELKHORN # 3 2678017 LAKE COAL CO INC RC PP XXXXX 438175X KY CAROLINA COAL CO RC CM HAZARD NO 4 4670144 ASHERS QUALITY COAL CORPORATION RC SG FIRECLAY Division of Mine Permits CHIA Section 7575.85 Permitted Disturbed 8 8 112.43 46 #4 RIDER ELEV 1480, #4 RIDER ELEV 1480, HAZARD #4 ELEV 1440, HAZARD #4 ELEV 1440 70 70 UG HAZARD #4 5.4 6 UG AMBURGEY 1 5 8 0 17.22 20 10 10 1.44 21 0 3 26 18.65 Page 1 of 3 source: http://eec.ky.gov/SearchCenter/Results.aspx?k=867-0298 See Section 6, References Status Released Permit # Company Name Acreages Status Mine Types Seams 4675074 BISMARCK COAL INC RC UG FIRECLAY 4677003 GOLDEN OAK MINING CO INC RC HR XXXXX 547476X B & A COAL CO RC SP 585376X B & A COAL CO RC 6675066 Permitted Disturbed 369.32 18 4.1 5 HAZARD NO 4 0 10 CM HAZARD NO 4, WHITESBURG 0 10 LUCKY BRANCH COAL CO INC FF UG FIRECLAY 256.11 7.56 673377X L & J COAL CO RC CM HAZARD NO 4 12 8 8670078 MEADE & SHEPHERD COAL COMPANY INC RC SC FIRECLAY, FIRECLAY RIDER 23.18 14 8670117 TOLSON CREEK COAL COMPANY RC SC HAMLIN 2 0 8670118 PEE WEE COAL COMPANY RC SC HAMLIN 1.9 3.88 8670119 BUDDY COLLINS CONSTRUCTION RC SC HAMLIN 2 0 8670145 RONNIE RATLIFF FF SC AMBURGEY 2 1.6 8670171 CLIFFORD PITTMAN RC SC HAZARD #4 1.96 20 8670183 JERALD PITTMAN FF SC WHITESBURG 1.99 2 8670298 MEADE & SHEPHERD COAL COMPANY INC RC SC FIRECLAY, FIRECLAY RIDER, HAMLIN, #4 RIDER 151.69 120 8670335 MANNING COAL CORPORATION RC SA SC SG SM UG AMBURGEY, WHITESBURG, HAZARD #4, HAZARD #4R 269.6 50.79 8670346 MANNING COAL CORPORATION RC SA SC SG SM UG 5-A, HAMLIN, HAZARD NO 4 RIDER, HAZARD NO 4 932.34 189.46 8670363 KATCO MINING COMPANY INC RC SC SG HAZARD 4, HAZARD 4 RIDER 47.06 39.64 8670364 KATCO MINING COMPANY INC RC SC HAZARD 4, 4 RIDER 37.62 37.62 8670437 ENTERPRISE MINING COMPANY LLC RC SA SG FIRE CLAY, FIRE CLAY RIDER 165.15 0 8674008 C & C COAL CO FF SC HAMLIN 1.9 2 8675023 LAKE COAL CO INC RC UG AMBURGY 264.2 1 8675032 COAL MOLE INC RC UG FIRECLAY #4 406.19 4 8675062 BIG OAK COAL COMPANY FF UG HAZARD #4 104.31 11 8675088 COAL MOLE INC RC UG HAZARD NO 4, FIRECLAY 183.96 7.3 8675101 ENTERPRISE COAL COMPANY RC UG HAZARD #4 321.78 43.92 8675113 W & P COAL COMPANY INC RC UG FIRECLAY, W BURG 242.99 5 8675164 DLX INC RC UG ELKHORN #3 111.92 3.64 8675165 DLX INC RC UG ELKHORN #3 1018.89 9.29 8675169 PHOENIX MINING INC RC UG HAZARD NO 7, HAZARD NO 4 1024.46 29.8 8675170 PHOENIX MINING INC RC UG HAZARD NO 7 51.34 20.8 8675244 COASTAL COAL COMPANY LLC RC UG FIRECLAY, UNNAMED, UNNAMED #2 453.96 9.96 8677022 COASTAL COAL COMPANY LLC RC HR XXXX 4.6 4.6 8679015 ENTERPRISE MINING COMPANY LLC PP XXXX 37 17 Division of Mine Permits CHIA Section RC Page 2 of 3 source: http://eec.ky.gov/SearchCenter/Results.aspx?k=867-0298 See Section 6, References Status Total Active Surface Acreage: 3,351.95 Total Active Underground Acreage: 8,837.34 Total Released Surface Acreage: 2,128.23 Total Released Underground Acreage: 4,851.05 Total Proposed Surface Acreage: 241.03 Total Proposed Underground Acreage: 1.00 Division of Mine Permits CHIA Section Acreage Grand Totals: Permitted: Disturbed: Reclaimed: 18,956.30 1965.51 1514.76 Page 3 of 3 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons Roxana Prison Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix B NOVEMBER 11, 2015 SAMPLING RESULTS January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 12 REI Consultants, Inc. PO Box 286 Beaver, WV 25813 TEL: (304) 255-2500 Website: www.reiclabs.com 3029-C Peters Creek Road Roanoke, VA 24019 TEL: 540.777.1276 101 17th Street Ashland, KY 41101 TEL: 606.393.5027 1557 Commerce Road, Suite 201 Verona, VA 24482 TEL: 540.248.0183 16 Commerce Drive Westover, WV 26501 TEL: 304.241.5861 Friday, November 20, 2015 Mr. Steve Stansfield CARDNO MM&A 534 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD BLUEFIELD, VA 24605-9364 TEL: (276) 322-5467 FAX: (276) 322-1510 RE: ROXANA PRISON SITE Work Order #: 1511G81 Dear Mr. Steve Stansfield: REI Consultants, Inc. received 6 sample(s) on 11/13/2015 for the analyses presented in the following report. Sincerely, Beth Johnson Project Manager Page 1 of 15 WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Case Narrative Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE The analytical results presented in this report were produced using documented laboratory SOPs that incorporate appropriate quality control procedures as described in the applicable methods. Verification of required sample preservation (as required) is recorded on associated laboratory logs. Any deviation from compliance or method modification is identified within the body of this report by a qualifier footnote which is defined at the bottom of this page. All sample results for solid samples are reported on an "as-received" wet weight basis unless otherwise noted. Results reported for sums of individual parameters, such as TTHM and HAA5, may vary slightly from the sum of the individual parameter results, due to rounding of individual results, as required by EPA. The test results in this report meet all NELAP and/or VELAP requirements for parameters clearly designated as PA, VA, PA/VA, or VELAP in the column labeled NELAP. Please note if the sample collection time is not provided on the Chain of Custody, the default recording will be 0:00:00. This may cause some tests to be apparently analyzed out of hold. All tests performed by REIC Service Centers are designated by an annotation on the test code. All other tests were performed by REIC's Main Laboratory in Beaver, WV. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of REIC. DEFINITIONS: MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level MDL: Method Detection Limit; The lowest concentration of analyte that can be detected by the method in the applicable matrix. Mg/Kg or mg/L: Units of part per million (PPM) - milligram per Kilogram (weight/weight) or milligram per Liter (weight/volume). NA: Not Applicable ND: Not Detected at the PQL or MDL PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit; The lowest verified limit to which data is quantified without qualifications. Analyte concentrations below PQL are reported either as ND or as a number with a "J" qualifier. Qual: Qualifier that applies to the analyte reported. TIC: Tentatively Identified Compound, Estimated Concentration denoted by "J" qualifier. Ug/Kg or ug/L: Units of part per billion (PPB) - microgram per kilogram (weight/weight) or microgram per liter (weight/volume). QUALIFIERS: X: Reported value exceeds required MCL B: Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration > 1/2 the PQL E: The sample result is within the method accepted Linear Dynamic Range determined by the lab for this analysis. However, it may be considered estimated when applying the TNI (The NELAC Institute) standard. H: Holding time for preparation or analysis has been exceeded. J: Analyte concentration is reported, and is less than the PQL and greater than or equal to the MDL. The result reported is an estimate. S: % REC (% recovery) exceeds control limits CERTIFICATIONS: Beaver, WV: WVDHHR 00412CM, WVDEP 060, VADCLS 00281, KYDEP 90039, TNDEQ TN02926, NCDWQ 466, PADEP 68-00839, VADCLS (VELAP) 460148 Bioassay (Beaver, WV): WVDEP 060, VADCLS(VELAP) 460148, PADEP 68-00839 Roanoke, VA: VADCLS(VELAP) 460150 Verona, VA: VADCLS(VELAP) 460151 Ashland, KY: KYDEP 00094, WVDEP 389 Morgantown, WV: WVDHHR 003112M, WVDEP 387 Page 2 of 15 WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 10:10:00 AM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-01A Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: SOUTHWEST STREAM MOUTH Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC Field Sampler Analyst: SS NA NA Field Conductivity 711 NA NA µmhos/cm Field pH 6.73 NA NA SU Field Temp 50.8 NA NA DEG F METALS BY ICP Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Chromium Analyst: LF ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron 0.0503 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Manganese 0.0162 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ANIONS by ION CHROMATOGRAPHY Method: EPA 300.0, Rev.2.1 (1993) Analyst: CF Chloride ND 0.20 1.00 NA mg/L 11/13/15 PA/VA Sulfate 316 10.0 50.0 NA mg/L 11/16/15 PA/VA TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Total Dissolved Solids Method: SM2540 C-1997 521 5 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS Total Suspended Solids ND NA 10.9 1.0 1 NA 10 mg/L NA 51.1 1.0 20.0 NA NA NA NA PA/VA 11/16/15 PA/VA Analyst: VS mg/L 11/16/15 PA/VA Analyst: VS mg/L Method: SM4500-H+-B-2000 7.22 11/17/15 Analyst: KY Method: SM2320 B-1997 pH - LAB TEST, HOLD TIME EXPIRED: pH mg/L Method: SM2310 B-1997 ALKALINITY Alkalinity, Total (As CaCO3) NA Method: SM2540 D-1997 ACIDITY Acidity, Total 10 Analyst: KY SU Page 3 of 15 11/16/15 Analyst: VS 11/16/15 10:41AM PA/VA WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 10:10:00 AM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-01B Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: SOUTHWEST STREAM MOUTH Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters Field Sampler PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC SS NA DISSOLVED METALS BY ICP Analyst: NA Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Antimony ND 0.0080 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Arsenic ND 0.0070 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA 0.0618 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Beryllium ND 0.0002 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Cadmium ND 0.0003 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Barium Calcium 63.5 0.0500 0.500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA E mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Copper ND 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Lead mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ND 0.0030 0.0100 NA Magnesium 54.7 0.0500 0.500 NA Manganese 0.0161 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Potassium 3.42 0.0400 0.100 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Selenium E ND 0.0100 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Sodium 8.73 0.0300 0.100 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Thallium ND 0.0090 0.0100 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Notes: Calculation of the percent recovery on the matrix spike for Magnesium was not applicable since the spike added was <30% of the parent sample's background concentration. MERCURY, Dissolved Mercury Method: EPA 245.1, Rev. 3.0 (1994) ND 0.0001 0.0010 NA Analyst: EP mg/L Page 4 of 15 11/20/15 WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 11:50:00 AM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-02A Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: NORTHWEST TOE OF HOLLOW FILL Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC Field Sampler Analyst: SS NA NA Field Conductivity 1831 NA NA umhos/cm Field pH 7.05 NA NA SU Field Temp 54.1 NA NA DEG F METALS BY ICP Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Chromium Analyst: LF ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron 0.0854 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Manganese 0.0740 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ANIONS by ION CHROMATOGRAPHY Method: EPA 300.0, Rev.2.1 (1993) Chloride Sulfate 3.95 0.20 1.00 NA mg/L 11/13/15 PA/VA 1,210 25.0 125 NA mg/L 11/16/15 PA/VA TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Total Dissolved Solids Method: SM2540 C-1997 2,230 5 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS Total Suspended Solids Acidity, Total 2 NA NA mg/L 1 NA 32.9 1.0 10 mg/L NA 1.0 pH - LAB TEST, HOLD TIME EXPIRED: 20.0 NA mg/L NA NA NA 11/16/15 PA/VA 11/16/15 PA/VA Analyst: VS mg/L Method: SM4500-H+-B-2000 7.41 PA/VA Analyst: VS Method: SM2320 B-1997 377 11/17/15 Analyst: KY Method: SM2310 B-1997 ALKALINITY Alkalinity, Total (As CaCO3) 10 Analyst: KY Method: SM2540 D-1997 ACIDITY pH Analyst: CF SU Page 5 of 15 11/16/15 Analyst: VS 11/16/15 10:41AM PA/VA WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 11:50:00 AM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-02B Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: NORTHWEST TOE OF HOLLOW FILL Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters Field Sampler PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC SS NA DISSOLVED METALS BY ICP Analyst: NA Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Antimony ND 0.0080 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Arsenic ND 0.0070 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA 0.0335 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Beryllium ND 0.0002 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Cadmium ND 0.0003 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Calcium Barium 259 0.500 5.00 NA mg/L 11/18/15 PA/VA Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Copper ND 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Lead ND 0.0030 0.0100 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Magnesium 234 0.500 5.00 NA mg/L 11/18/15 PA/VA Manganese 0.0502 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Potassium 13.2 0.0400 0.100 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Selenium mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ND 0.0100 0.0200 NA Sodium 24.1 0.0300 0.100 NA Thallium ND 0.0090 0.0100 NA MERCURY, Dissolved Mercury E E Method: EPA 245.1, Rev. 3.0 (1994) ND 0.0001 0.0010 NA Analyst: EP mg/L Page 6 of 15 11/20/15 WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 12:25:00 PM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-03A Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: NORTHWEST STREAM MOUTH Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC Analyst: Field Conductivity 1505 NA NA umhos/cm Field pH 8.11 NA NA SU SS NA NA 54.5 NA NA Field Sampler Field Temp METALS BY ICP DEG F Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Manganese ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ANIONS by ION CHROMATOGRAPHY Method: EPA 300.0, Rev.2.1 (1993) Analyst: CF Chloride 2.34 0.20 1.00 NA mg/L 11/13/15 PA/VA Sulfate 794 25.0 125 NA mg/L 11/16/15 PA/VA TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Total Dissolved Solids Method: SM2540 C-1997 1,450 5 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS Total Suspended Solids 1 NA ND 1.0 1 NA 10 mg/L NA 215 1.0 20.0 NA NA NA NA PA/VA 11/16/15 PA/VA Analyst: VS mg/L 11/16/15 PA/VA Analyst: VS mg/L Method: SM4500-H+-B-2000 8.31 11/17/15 Analyst: KY Method: SM2320 B-1997 pH - LAB TEST, HOLD TIME EXPIRED: pH mg/L Method: SM2310 B-1997 ALKALINITY Alkalinity, Total (As CaCO3) NA Method: SM2540 D-1997 ACIDITY Acidity, Total 10 Analyst: KY SU Page 7 of 15 11/16/15 Analyst: VS 11/16/15 10:41AM PA/VA WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 12:25:00 PM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-03B Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: NORTHWEST STREAM MOUTH Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters Field Sampler PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC SS NA DISSOLVED METALS BY ICP Analyst: NA Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Antimony ND 0.0080 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Arsenic ND 0.0070 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA 0.0581 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Beryllium ND 0.0002 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Cadmium ND 0.0003 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Calcium Barium 181 0.0500 0.500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA E mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Copper ND 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Lead mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ND 0.0030 0.0100 NA Magnesium 178 0.0500 0.500 NA Manganese ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Potassium 9.14 0.0400 0.100 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Selenium mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ND 0.0100 0.0200 NA Sodium 20.3 0.0300 0.100 NA Thallium ND 0.0090 0.0100 NA MERCURY, Dissolved Mercury E E Method: EPA 245.1, Rev. 3.0 (1994) ND 0.0001 0.0010 NA Analyst: EP mg/L Page 8 of 15 11/20/15 WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 1:30:00 PM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-04A Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: SOUTHEAST HOLLOW FILL TOE Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC Field Sampler Analyst: SS NA NA Field Conductivity 1211 NA NA umhos/cm Field pH 7.75 NA NA SU Field Temp 54.9 NA NA DEG F METALS BY ICP Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Manganese ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ANIONS by ION CHROMATOGRAPHY Method: EPA 300.0, Rev.2.1 (1993) Analyst: CF Chloride 1.93 0.20 1.00 NA mg/L 11/13/15 PA/VA Sulfate 763 25.0 125 NA mg/L 11/16/15 PA/VA TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Total Dissolved Solids Method: SM2540 C-1997 1,300 5 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS Total Suspended Solids 3 NA 11.0 1.0 1 NA 10 mg/L NA 191 1.0 20.0 NA NA NA NA PA/VA 11/16/15 PA/VA Analyst: VS mg/L 11/16/15 PA/VA Analyst: VS mg/L Method: SM4500-H+-B-2000 7.89 11/17/15 Analyst: KY Method: SM2320 B-1997 pH - LAB TEST, HOLD TIME EXPIRED: pH mg/L Method: SM2310 B-1997 ALKALINITY Alkalinity, Total (As CaCO3) NA Method: SM2540 D-1997 ACIDITY Acidity, Total 10 Analyst: KY SU Page 9 of 15 11/16/15 Analyst: VS 11/16/15 10:41AM PA/VA WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 1:30:00 PM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-04B Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: SOUTHEAST HOLLOW FILL TOE Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters Field Sampler PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC SS NA DISSOLVED METALS BY ICP Analyst: NA Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Antimony ND 0.0080 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Arsenic ND 0.0070 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA 0.0373 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Beryllium ND 0.0002 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Cadmium ND 0.0003 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Calcium Barium 155 0.0500 0.500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA E mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Copper ND 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Lead mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ND 0.0030 0.0100 NA Magnesium 153 0.0500 0.500 NA Manganese ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Potassium 8.87 0.0400 0.100 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Selenium mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ND 0.0100 0.0200 NA Sodium 17.3 0.0300 0.100 NA Thallium ND 0.0090 0.0100 NA MERCURY, Dissolved Mercury E E Method: EPA 245.1, Rev. 3.0 (1994) ND 0.0001 0.0010 NA Analyst: EP mg/L Page 10 of 15 11/20/15 WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 3:35:00 PM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-05A Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: EAST HOLLOW FILL TOE Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC Field Sampler Analyst: SS NA NA Field Conductivity 1900 NA NA umhos/cm Field pH 7.90 NA NA SU Field Temp 55.4 NA NA DEG F METALS BY ICP Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA 0.0061 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Manganese ANIONS by ION CHROMATOGRAPHY Method: EPA 300.0, Rev.2.1 (1993) Chloride Sulfate 3.02 0.20 1.00 NA mg/L 11/13/15 PA/VA 1,310 25.0 125 NA mg/L 11/16/15 PA/VA TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Total Dissolved Solids Method: SM2540 C-1997 2,260 5 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS Total Suspended Solids Acidity, Total 1 NA NA 11/17/15 mg/L 1 NA ND 1.0 10 11/16/15 mg/L NA 1.0 pH - LAB TEST, HOLD TIME EXPIRED: 20.0 NA 11/16/15 mg/L NA NA NA PA/VA Analyst: VS 11/16/15 mg/L Method: SM4500-H+-B-2000 8.09 PA/VA Analyst: VS Method: SM2320 B-1997 308 PA/VA Analyst: KY Method: SM2310 B-1997 ALKALINITY Alkalinity, Total (As CaCO3) 10 Analyst: KY Method: SM2540 D-1997 ACIDITY pH Analyst: CF SU Analyst: VS 11/16/15 10:41AM Page 11 of 15 PA/VA WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 3:35:00 PM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-05B Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: EAST HOLLOW FILL TOE Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters Field Sampler PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC SS NA DISSOLVED METALS BY ICP Analyst: NA Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Antimony ND 0.0080 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Arsenic ND 0.0070 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA 0.0217 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Beryllium ND 0.0002 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Cadmium ND 0.0003 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Calcium Barium 250 0.500 5.00 NA mg/L 11/18/15 PA/VA Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Copper ND 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Lead ND 0.0030 0.0100 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Magnesium 238 0.500 5.00 NA mg/L 11/18/15 PA/VA Manganese 0.0064 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Potassium 16.4 0.0400 0.100 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Selenium mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ND 0.0100 0.0200 NA Sodium 32.5 0.0300 0.100 NA Thallium ND 0.0090 0.0100 NA MERCURY, Dissolved Mercury E E Method: EPA 245.1, Rev. 3.0 (1994) ND 0.0001 0.0010 NA Analyst: EP mg/L Page 12 of 15 11/20/15 WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 4:50:00 PM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-06A Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: EAST HOLLOW FILL BELOW POND Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC Field Sampler Analyst: SS NA NA Field Conductivity 1675 NA NA umhos/cm Field pH 7.97 NA NA SU Field Temp 55.9 NA NA DEG F METALS BY ICP Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA 0.0350 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Manganese ANIONS by ION CHROMATOGRAPHY Method: EPA 300.0, Rev.2.1 (1993) Chloride Sulfate 2.26 0.20 1.00 NA mg/L 11/13/15 PA/VA 1,030 25.0 125 NA mg/L 11/16/15 PA/VA TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Total Dissolved Solids Method: SM2540 C-1997 1,820 5 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS Total Suspended Solids Acidity, Total 1 NA NA 11/17/15 mg/L 1 NA ND 1.0 10 11/16/15 mg/L NA 1.0 pH - LAB TEST, HOLD TIME EXPIRED: 20.0 NA 11/16/15 mg/L NA NA NA PA/VA Analyst: VS 11/16/15 mg/L Method: SM4500-H+-B-2000 8.23 PA/VA Analyst: VS Method: SM2320 B-1997 270 PA/VA Analyst: KY Method: SM2310 B-1997 ALKALINITY Alkalinity, Total (As CaCO3) 10 Analyst: KY Method: SM2540 D-1997 ACIDITY pH Analyst: CF SU Analyst: VS 11/16/15 10:41AM Page 13 of 15 PA/VA WO#: 1511G81 REI Consultants, Inc. - Analytical Report Date Reported: 11/20/2015 Client: CARDNO MM&A Collection Date: 11/11/2015 4:50:00 PM Project: ROXANA PRISON SITE Lab ID: 1511G81-06B Date Received: Matrix: 11/13/2015 Liquid Client Sample ID: EAST HOLLOW FILL BELOW POND Site ID: Analysis Result MDL Field/Miscellaneous Parameters Field Sampler PQL MCL Qual Units Date Analyzed NELAP Method: FLD/MISC SS NA DISSOLVED METALS BY ICP Analyst: NA Method: EPA 200.7 Rev. 4.4 (1994) Analyst: LF Antimony ND 0.0080 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Arsenic ND 0.0070 0.0200 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA 0.0277 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Beryllium ND 0.0002 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Cadmium ND 0.0003 0.0010 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Calcium Barium 207 0.0500 0.500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Chromium ND 0.0010 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Copper ND 0.0020 0.0050 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Iron ND 0.0100 0.0500 NA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA Lead mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA mg/L 11/17/15 PA/VA ND 0.0030 0.0100 NA Magnesium 216 0.0500 0.500 NA Manganese 0.0293 0.0010 0.0050 NA Potassium 14.3 0.0400 0.100 NA Selenium ND 0.0100 0.0200 NA Sodium 25.7 0.0300 0.100 NA Thallium ND 0.0090 0.0100 NA MERCURY, Dissolved Mercury E E E E Method: EPA 245.1, Rev. 3.0 (1994) ND 0.0001 0.0010 NA Analyst: EP mg/L Page 14 of 15 11/20/15 REI Consultants, Inc. PO Box 286 Beaver, WV 25813 TEL: (304)255-2500 Website: www.reiclabs.com Sample Receipt Checklist Client Name: CAR044 RCPNo: 1 Work Order Number: 1511G81 Date and Time Received: 11/13/2015 2:19:00 PM Received by: Completed By: Amanda Wilkins Reviewed By: Beth Johnson Completed Date: 11/13/2015 2:38:37 PM Reviewed Date: 11/13/2015 3:57 PM Carrier Name: Traves Meadows REIC 1. Chain of custody present? Yes x No 2. Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes x No 3. Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of custody? Yes x No 4. Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes x No 5. Custody seals intact? Yes No 6. Samples in proper container type and preservative? Yes x No 7. Were correct preservatives noted on COC? Yes x No 8. Sample containers intact? Yes x No 9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes x No 10. Were container labels complete? Yes x No 11. All samples received within holding time? Yes x No 12. Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes x No 13. Sample Temp. taken and recorded upon receipt? Yes x No 14. Water - Were bubbles absent in VOC vials? Yes No 15. Are Samples considered acceptable? Yes x No 16. COC filled out properly? Yes x Not Present x NA NA To 1.2 No Vials x No Client Notification/Response Client Name: CAR044 Work Order Number: 1511G81 Comment: Client Contacted: Yes Contact Mode: Phone Date Contacted: No Fax: NA Email: x Person Contacted: In Person: Contacted By: Regarding: Client Instructions: Corrective Action: Page 15 of 15 ºC DBPix Evaluation www.ammara.com Roxana Prison Site (Collected by Cardno, Inc.) Field Parameters Sample ID Field Collection Field pH Conductivity Date (s.u.) (µmhos/cm) Field Temp (°F) Southwest Stream Mouth 11/11/15 6.73 711 50.8 Northwest Toe Of Hollow Fill 11/11/15 7.05 1831 54.1 Northwest Stream Mouth 11/11/15 8.11 1505 54.5 Southeast Hollow Fill Toe 11/11/15 7.75 1211 54.9 East Hollow Fill Toe 11/11/15 7.90 1900 55.4 East Hollow Fill Below Pond 11/11/15 7.97 1675 55.9 Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons Roxana Prison Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix C STIFF AND PIPER DIAGRAMS January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 13 Roxana Prison Site November 11, 2015 Sampling Cations 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 meq/l 12 10 8 6 4 Anions 2 Na+K Ca 2 4 6 8 10 12 Cl 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Southwest Stream Mouth HCO3+CO3 Mg SO4 Na+K Cl Northwest Toe Of Hollow Fill Ca HCO3+CO3 Mg SO4 Na+K Cl Northwest Stream Mouth Ca HCO3+CO3 Mg SO4 Na+K Cl Ca Southeast Hollow Fill Toe HCO3+CO3 Mg SO4 Na+K Cl East Hollow Fill Toe Ca HCO3+CO3 Mg SO4 Na+K Cl East Hollow Fill Below Pond Ca Mg HCO3+CO3 SO4 CARD138 11/15 0.0 Ca drd 3,000.0 2,000.0 1,000.0 80 Mg 40 Calcium (Ca) 60 4,000.0 CATIONS (Parts Per Million) Total Dissolved Solids 5,000.0 20 Na+K %meq/l HCO 3 +CO 3 20 4 60 ANIONS Chloride (Cl) 40 SO 80 Cl Southwest Stream Mouth Northwest Toe Of Hollow Fill Northwest Stream Mouth Southeast Hollow Fill Toe East Hollow Fill Toe East Hollow Fill Below Pond November 11, 2015 Sampling Roxana Prison Site Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons Roxana Prison Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix D WATER QUALITY REPORTS FROM 1993-1995 January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 14 96674-96676.pdf 96674-96676.pdf 96674-96676.pdf 96714-96719.pdf 96714-96719.pdf 96714-96719.pdf 96714-96719.pdf 96714-96719.pdf 96714-96719.pdf 96720-96723.pdf 96720-96723.pdf 96720-96723.pdf 96720-96723.pdf 96724-96728.pdf 96724-96728.pdf 96724-96728.pdf 96724-96728.pdf 96724-96728.pdf 4014.pdf 4014.pdf 4014.pdf 4015.pdf 4015.pdf 4015.pdf 4017.pdf 4017.pdf 4017.pdf 4020.pdf 4020.pdf 4020.pdf 4023.pdf 4023.pdf 4023.pdf 4024.pdf 4024.pdf 4024.pdf 4203.pdf 4204.pdf 4204.pdf 4204.pdf 4205.pdf 4205.pdf 4205.pdf 4209.pdf 4209.pdf 4209.pdf 4210.pdf 4210.pdf 4210.pdf 4211.pdf 4211.pdf 4211.pdf 5753-5754.pdf 5753-5754.pdf 5755.pdf 5759-5761.pdf 5759-5761.pdf 5759-5761.pdf 7707.pdf 7707.pdf 7707.pdf 7708.pdf 7708.pdf 7708.pdf 7709.pdf 7709.pdf 7709.pdf 7710.pdf 7710.pdf 7710.pdf 7711.pdf 7711.pdf 7711.pdf 7712.pdf 7712.pdf 7712.pdf 7719.pdf 7719.pdf 7719.pdf 7720.pdf 7720.pdf 7720.pdf 7721.pdf 7721.pdf 7721.pdf 7722.pdf 7722.pdf 7722.pdf 7723.pdf 7723.pdf 7723.pdf 7724.pdf 7724.pdf 7724.pdf Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons Roxana Prison Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix E GEOLOGIST’S LOGS OF DRILLING RESULTS January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 15 TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Rig: Depth (m) From To Drill Method: Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Drilling Company: Test Boring No.: Location: 0.00 0.61 0.61 1.22 1.22 1.83 Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: Top 0.08 m: Brown organic soil with roots, moist From 0.08 m - 0.61 m: Silty clay becoming more sandy downward, tan to brown, moist, weathered, coal lense near base (Sample SS-1 from 0.08 m - 0.61 m) Top 0.46 m is sandy clay, highly weathered, tan to brown, moist, slight plasticity Bottom 0.15 m: grey sandstone, micaceous, dry, mostly unweathered. Sandy shale, highly weathered, soft, brown at top becoming grey and crumbly downward. 1.83 2.44 2.44 3.05 Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley 1 Page: Sample No. 11/20/15 Date: Drill Crew: HSA / Split Spoon BH-1-15 Roxana Prison 1st 2nd 3rd 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m of 1 4th 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m Rec. (%) SS-1 3 8 11 8 73 - 4 5 20 14 80 - 4 4 5 3 42 Very weathered sandstone, soft, brown, coal laminations throughout, micaceous, moist (Sample SS-2) SS-2 6 7 5 10 45 3.05 From 2.44 m - 2.82 m: Predominantly sandstone, weathered grey to tan, micaceous, dry From 2.82 m - 3.05 m: Sandstone, light grey, unweathered, dry SS-3 7 7 7 50/0.15 70 3.35 Sandstone, grey, unweathered, hard, dry, micaceous Auger Refusal at 3.35 m - 50/.05 - - - 25 Note: BH-1-15 did not encounter any rock fill material. Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Abandon/Grout Boring: Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: Steve Stansfield CME850 Rig: Depth (m) From To 0.00 BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site 0.61 Drilling Company: Drill Method: Test Boring No.: Location: Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: Top 0.05 m: Brown organic soil, moist Bottom 0.56 m: Silty clay, grey with occasional brown sandy zones, numerous shale fragments, becoming sandy downward, very slightly moist (Sample SS-1 from 0.05 m - 0.61 m). Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley 1 Page: Sample No. 11/20/15 Date: Drill Crew: HSA / Split Spoon BH-2-15 Roxana Prison 1st 2nd 0.152 m 0.152 m 3rd 0.152 m of 4th 1 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m Rec. (%) SS-1 5 7 9 8 66 - 10 12 8 9 72 0.61 1.22 Top 0.18 m: Sandy clay, dark grey, very slightly moist, slight plasticity, slightly micaceous, becoming more sandy downward Bottom 0.43m: Predominantly sandstone, grey, occasional coal spars, micaceous, weathered 1.22 1.83 Sandy shale, weathered, grey with occasional brown sandstone fragments, dry, slightly micaceous - 6 6 4 5 65 1.83 2.44 Predominantly sandstone, grey, weathered, dry, micaceous, some tan weathered zones, poor recovery - 7 5 6 5 27 2.44 3.05 Sandstone, top 0.06 m weathered brown, remainder light grey, micaceous, dry - 14 9 9 4 57 3.05 3.66 Sandstone, very weathered and soft, light grey to mostly brown, occasional orange stains and coal spars, slightly moist (Sample SS-2) SS-2 3 8 12 11 66 4.21 Spoon only advanced to 4.02 m: Top 0.18 m is weathered grey sandstone, soft. From 3.84 m - 3.93 m there is coal and shale with orange staining. From 3.93 m - 4.02 m: Sandstone, light grey with tan zones, rare coal spars. Auger Refusal at 4.21 m (Sample SS-3) SS-3 17 20 50/0.05 - 95 3.66 Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) Abandon/Grout Boring: SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: Rig: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Depth (m) From To Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Drilling Company: Test Boring No.: Location: Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Page: Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: Top 0.15 m: Organic clay, brown, wet, root material Bottom 0.46 m: Silty clay, moist, weathered , light grey, occasional coal fragments, numerous shale fragments 0.00 0.61 0.61 1.22 Silty clay, light grey, weathered, numerous shale fragments, moist, becoming less plastic downward 1.22 1.83 Silty clay, light grey, occasional coal fragments, numerous shale fragments, slightly moist, low plasticity (Sample SS-1) 1.83 2.44 2.44 11/19/15 Date: Drill Crew: Drill Method: HSA / Split Spoon BH-3-15 Roxana Prison Sample No. 1st 1 2nd 3rd of 4th 3 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m Rec. (%) - 4 7 10 11 62 - 8 7 6 6 87 SS-1 5 6 7 5 61 Silty clay, becoming sandy downward, light grey, rare coal fragments, slightly moist, low plasticity, sandy zone is tan/brown - 3 3 6 22 60 3.05 Sandy clay becoming silty clay downward, occasional sandstone fragments, sandy zones weathered brown, light grey shale fragments downward, moist - 14 5 4 5 62 3.05 3.66 Clayey sand, brown to grey with some orange staining, occasional coal spars, light grey shale inclusions, friable, micaceous (Sample SS-2) SS-2 6 15 17 14 92 3.66 4.27 Silty clay, immediate top is brown weathered sandy zone, light grey, dry, non-plastic - 16 5 5 5 70 4.27 4.88 Silty clay, grey, moist, somewhat plastic, occasional sandstone inclusions with orange staining, numerous grey shale fragments - 5 3 3 5 90 4.88 5.49 Silty clay, grey, moist, somewhat plastic, sandstone inclusions throughout that are orange, occasional coal fragments (Sample SS-3) SS-3 3 4 4 5 52 5.49 6.10 Silty clay, grey, moist, somewhat plastic, sandstone inclusions throughout that are orange, occasional coal fragments - 3 5 7 4 70 6.10 6.71 Silty clay, grey, not as moist or plastic as above, rare sandstone inclusions, numerous light grey shale fragments - 8 4 5 9 75 6.71 7.32 Silty clay, moist, somewhat plastic, grey with dark grey zones, some orange stained sandstone throughout, rare coal fragments (Sample SS-4) SS-4 3 3 4 3 75 7.32 7.92 Silty clay, only slightly moist and plastic, sandstone lense near top, rare sandstone fragment inclusions and occasional shale inclusions - 5 3 3 6 67 7.92 8.53 Silty clay, grey, slightly moist with slight plasticity, numerous shale inclusions, very rare sandstone fragments - 6 7 6 6 95 8.53 9.14 Silty clay, grey, slightly moist with slight plasticity, increasing orange stained sandstone fragments, occasional coal fragments (Sample SS-5) SS-5 8 8 18 11 74 Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Abandon/Grout Boring: Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: Rig: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Depth (m) From To Drilling Company: Test Boring No.: Location: Project No.: CARD138 Central Star 11/19/15 Date: Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Drill Crew: Drill Method: HSA / Split Spoon Page: Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: Silty clay, grey, very slightly moist with increasing sand content, mostly non-plastic, very rare brown sandstone fragments and coal fragments BH-3-15 Roxana Prison 1st 2 2nd 3rd of 4th 3 5th Rec. (%) Sample No. 0.152 m - 5 5 6 7 78 11 74 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 9.14 9.75 9.75 10.36 Silty sand, light grey to grey, mostly dry, non-plastic, slightly micaceous - 6 6 8 10.36 Silty sand becoming more sandy downward, occasional orange 10.97 stained sandstone fragments, scattered coal fragments, shale and sandy shale fragments throughout, grey, dry (Sample SS-6) SS-6 6 10 40 50/0.08 10.97 11.58 Very difficult auger drilling Hard rock Only spoon returns consisted of hard, fine grained sandstone, grey - 50/0.05 - - - 11.58 12.19 Silty clay, grey, rare brown/orange lenses, shale inclusions throughout, dry - 10 10 13 9 86 12.19 12.80 Silty clay, grey, dry, non-plastic, scattered shale inclusions some of which are silty, very rare and small sandstone fragments (broken) - 7 7 10 8 71 12.80 Silty clay, grey to dark grey, slightly moist and slight plasticity, 13.41 occasional orange sandstone inclusions and coal fragments, slightly sandy downward (Sample SS-7) SS-7 5 8 9 14 90 13.41 14.02 Silty clay, grey to dark grey, mostly dry and non-plastic, silty shale inclusions throughout - 7 11 9 8 60 14.02 14.63 Silty clay, grey to dark grey, mostly dry and non-plastic, silty shale inclusions throughout, very rare brown sandstone fragments - 5 10 6 7 74 14.63 Silty clay, grey to dark grey, carbonaceous zones, scattered coal 15.24 fragments throughout, sandy at immediate top, brown to orange sandstone lense in center (Sample SS-8) SS-8 6 7 8 8 72 15.24 Top 0.15 m: Wet clayey sand, dark 15.85 Bottom 0.46 m: Brown to grey sandstone, micaceous, coal fragments at base (Sample SS-9) SS-9 4 12 12 12 91 15.85 16.46 Predominantly sandstone, alternating grey and brown, dry, micaceous, driller reports drilling conditions becoming more difficult - 10 18 21 19 62 16.46 17.07 Predominantly sandstone, alternating grey and brown, dry, micaceous, few coal fragments at base - 12 19 11 8 60 SS-10 6 9 10 9 82 - 12 17 21 13 95 17.07 17.68 Claystone with sandstone lenses, dark grey, occasional orange 17.68 sandstone lenses, coal fragments throughout, moist, somewhat plastic (Sample SS-10) Top 0.30 m: Claystone with sandstone lenses, dark grey, occasional orange sandstone lenses, coal fragments throughout, 18.29 moist, somewhat plastic Bottom 0.30 m: Predominantly sandstone, alternating grey and brown, micaceous, dry, scattered coal fragments at base Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: 87 Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Abandon/Grout Boring: Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: Rig: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Depth (m) From To Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Drilling Company: Test Boring No.: Location: Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Page: Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: Sample No. 18.29 18.90 Sandstone, grey with alternating tan layers, dry, micaceous, crumbly 18.90 19.51 19.51 20.12 11/19/15 Date: Drill Crew: Drill Method: HSA / Split Spoon BH-3-15 Roxana Prison 1st 3 2nd 3rd of 4th 3 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m Rec. (%) - N/A N/A N/A 12 61 Sandstone, grey with alternating tan layers, micaceous, crumbly, scattered coal fragments near base, dry, friable - 10 9 9 12 85 20.12 Sandstone, grey with alternating tan layers, micaceous, crumbly, very scattered coal fragments, friable - 7 12 14 21 45 20.73 Sandstone, grey with alternating tan layers, micaceous, crumbly, very scattered coal fragments, friable, Total Depth - 23 14 26 28 53 Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Abandon/Grout Boring: Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: Rig: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Drill Method: Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Drilling Company: Test Boring No.: Location: 11/16-17/15 Date: Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Drill Crew: Page: HSA / Split Spoon BH-4-15 Roxana Prison 1 of 2 Rec. (%) Depth (m) From To Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: 0.00 0.61 Organic material, very slightly moist, some shale fragments and rare weathered sandstone fragments, non-plastic - 20 50/0.15 0.61 1.22 Silty clay, slightly moist, non-plastic, occasional weathered light grey shale fragments - 32 33 1.22 1.83 Silty clay, slightly moist, dark grey, low plastic, very rare fine grained sandstone (Sample SS-1) SS-1 6 50/0.05 1.83 2.44 Silty clay and shale, light grey, mostly dry, non-plastic, occasional sandstone boulder - 23 19 7 5 38 2.44 3.05 Silty clay, dark grey, moist with some iron staining in matrix, slightly plastic (Sample SS-2) SS-2 5 7 8 5 65 3.05 3.66 Silty clay, medium grey with tan sandstone boulders, mostly dry and non-plastic - 3.66 4.27 Silty clay, medium grey, numerous shale fragments, mostly dry but slightly damp at immediate base, very minimal sandstone (Sample SS-3) SS-3 20 15 12 11 80 4.27 4.88 Silty clay, moist, dark grey, shale fragments within matrix, very slightly plastic (Sample SS-4) SS-4 5 11 5 5 70 4.88 5.49 Silty clay, moist, dark grey, shale fragments within matrix, very slightly plastic - 6 6 9 11 70 5.49 6.10 Silty clay, slightly moist, dark grey, numerous shale fragments, rare coal spars, very slightly plastic (Sample SS-5) SS-5 8 7 6 6 54 6.10 6.71 Silty clay, slightly moist, dark grey, numerous shale fragments, rare coal spars, very slightly plastic - 10 4 5 4 65 6.71 7.32 Silty clay, slightly moist, slightly plastic, very rare sandstone fragments (some weathered), abundant dark shale fragments (Sample SS-6) SS-6 4 5 5 6 55 7.32 7.92 Sandy clay, light grey, predominantly sandstone with some weathering, mostly dry, non-plastic - 9 8 11 7 75 7.92 8.53 Sandy clay, predominantly light grey sandstone with abundant coal laminations, some highly weathered zones, dry, non-plastic (Sample SS-7) SS-7 9 23 4 13 66 8.53 9.14 Top half predominantly silty clay, bottom predominantly sandstone fragments, grey to light grey, slightly moist, top slightly plastic - 11 15 9 50/0.13 80 Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: Sample No. 1st 2nd 3rd 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 4th 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m 40 18 22 65 30 34 50/0.03 30 Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Abandon/Grout Boring: Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: Rig: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Drill Method: Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Drilling Company: Test Boring No.: Location: Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: 9.14 9.75 Predominantly sandstone and siltstone fragments, micaceous, slightly weathered, mostly dry, non-plastic 9.75 10.36 Silty clay, occasional highly weathered tan shale zones and coal lenses, moist, somewhat plastic (Sample SS-8) 10.36 10.97 Silty clay, dark grey, slightly moist, shale fragments, rare tan weathered zones, slightly plastic 10.97 Silty clay, medium to dark grey, slightly moist zones, occasional 11.58 carbonaceous lenses, shale fragments and rare weathered zones, mostly non-plastic, sandy at base 11.58 12.19 12.19 11/16-17/15 Date: Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Drill Crew: Page: HSA / Split Spoon Depth (m) From To BH-4-15 Roxana Prison 2 2nd 0.152 m - 12 14 19 9 82 SS-8 15 9 7 10 85 - 7 8 4 4 67 - 8 8 8 9 75 - 11 19 11 16 47 Predominantly highly weathered sandstone and siltstone, tan with 12.80 some orange zones, micaceous, rare shale fragments, moist, nonplastic (Sample SS-9) SS-9 15 22 24 13 52 12.80 Predominantly highly weathered sandstone and siltstone, tan with 13.41 some orange zones, micaceous, rare shale fragments, moist, nonplastic - 31 25 50/0.10 13.41 Predominantly highly weathered sandstone and siltstone, tan with 13.56 some orange zones, micaceous, rare shale fragments, moist, nonplastic, Auger refusal. - 50/0.05 Total Boring Depth: 5th Rec. (%) 1st 0.152 m Water Levels: 4th 2 Sample No. Predominantly highly weathered sandstone and siltstone, grey to tan, micaceous, non-plastic, moist 3rd of 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 65 55 Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Abandon/Grout Boring: Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: Rig: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Depth (m) From To 0.00 0.61 0.61 1.22 1.22 Drilling Company: Drill Method: Test Boring No.: Location: Date: Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Drill Crew: 11/18/15 Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Page: HSA / Split Spoon Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: Top 0.30 m: Dark organic soil with roots, coal chip and occasional sandstone fragments Bottom 0.30 m: Sandy soil, numerous sandstone fragments, micaceous, dry, non-plastic, weathered tan BH-5-15 Roxana Prison 1st Sample No. 1 2nd 0.152 m 0.152 m 3rd of 4th 3 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m Rec. (%) - 3 3 12 18 83 Sandy clay, predominantly soft weathered sandstone fragments, very slightly moist, tan, no noticeable staining, non-plastic - 20 20 20 18 100 1.83 Predominantly silty shale fragments, light grey, mostly dry, non-plastic rare coal fragments and weathered tan sandstone inclusions (Sample SS-1) SS-1 26 10 9 10 80 1.83 2.44 Silty clay, numerous shale fragments, mainly dry and non-plastic, very rare weathered (tan) sandstone fragments - 8 32 20 33 70 2.44 3.05 Predominantly crumbled sandstone fragments, mostly dry, micaceous, non-plastic, very little weathering, light grey - 11 10 10 5 52 3.05 3.66 Predominantly weathered shaley sandstone, more weathered and tan than above, some minor orange staining, dry, non-plastic (Sample SS-2) SS-2 8 8 19 17 55 3.66 4.27 Predominantly shaley sandstone, hard, dry, micaceous, not as weathered as above, non-plastic, grey (no recovery from 3.81 m - 4.27 m) - 5 50/0.13 4.27 4.88 Shaley sandstone, hard, grey, dry (no recovery from 4.36 m - 4.88 m) (Note: Driller added ~5 gallons of water, very difficult auger drilling) - 50/0.05 4.88 5.49 Intermixed shaley sandstone and weathered shale, moist at top and dry at base, coal lense near middle, some orange staining (Sample SS-3) SS-3 21 26 48 50 80 5.49 6.10 Silty clay at top and becoming more sandy downward, moist, slightly plastic, some orange staining throughout and red at base (Sample SS-4) SS-4 12 8 7 7 77 6.10 6.71 Silty clay, weathered, grey, becoming sandy downward, little to no orange staining noted, moist - 6 6 3 3 50 6.71 7.32 Silty clay, numerous coal fragments, rare orange sandstone fragments, moist, slightly plastic, sandstone fragments near base (Sample SS-5) SS-5 3 1 2 1 47 7.32 7.92 Silty clay, numerous orange stains throughout, moist, moderate plasticity, occasional shale and coal fragments (Sample SS-6) SS-6 1 1 4 9 57 7.92 8.53 Predominantly clay soil, moist, brown, occasional sandstone and shale fragments, moderate plasticity - 8 4 4 6 35 8.53 9.14 Sandy clay, numerous sandstone fragments and boulders, tan to brown, very rare shale inclusions, moist - 3 6 6 9 56 Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: 90 - Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Abandon/Grout Boring: Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: Rig: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Drill Method: Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Drilling Company: Test Boring No.: Location: Depth (m) From To Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: 9.14 9.75 Sandy clay, moist to wetter downward, tan to brown, scattered shale and coal inclusions throughout, dense, some orange/red staining 9.75 Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Page: Sample No. 11/18/15 Date: Drill Crew: HSA / Split Spoon BH-5-15 Roxana Prison 1st 2 2nd 3rd of 4th 3 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m Rec. (%) - 3 3 4 4 100 Silty clay, dark grey, moist, large coal fragments, some sandstone 10.36 inclusions (tan to brown), scattered shale fragments, moderate plasticity (Sample SS-7) SS-7 3 6 5 4 57 10.36 Silty clay at top with predominantly sandstone downward, scattered 10.97 shale and sandstone inclusions in top (Moist, moderate plasticity); sandstone is light grey, micaceous, dry with rare coal spars - 6 5 24 4 90 10.97 11.58 Predominantly sandstone, crumbly, light grey to tan/orange, micaceous, dry - 8 5 22 11 30 11.58 12.19 Sandy clay, numerous sandstone inclusions, grey to tan, crumbly, coal spars throughout, rare orange staining (Sample SS-8) SS-8 6 7 7 6 67 12.19 12.80 Predominantly weathered sandstone, light grey and tan, occasional orange staining, micaceous, crumbly, dry - 9 26 28 18 47 12.80 Friable sandstone, tan to orange, grey shale inclusions, moderate soft, very slightly damp, occasional large coal fragments (Sample SS13.41 9). Note: A piece of wiring was in spoon sample from 12.80 m 13.41 m, indicating boring is not in natural rock at this depth. SS-9 8 7 9 14 90 13.41 14.02 Friable sandstone, brown to tan, rare grey shale and coal inclusions, mostly dry - 10 14 10 14 52 14.02 14.63 Clayey sand, brown to tan, rare grey shale and small coal inclusions, somewhat moist, some larger sandstone boulders - 6 4 8 8 56 14.63 Clayey sand, brown to tan, rare grey shale and small coal inclusions, 15.24 somewhat moist, some larger sandstone boulders (Sample SS-10) SS-10 5 5 10 7 57 15.24 Top half: Clayey sand, brown to tan, rare grey shale and small coal inclusions, somewhat moist, some larger sandstone boulders (Driller 15.85 added water, difficult augering) Bottom half: Predominantly sandstone, tan, micaceous, dry - 6 12 8 8 61 15.85 16.46 - 5 8 8 6 39 16.46 Intermixed clayey sand and shale, numerous coal fragments, sand is 17.07 tan to orange color, sample wet due to driller adding water (Sample S-11) SS-11 4 6 6 11 95 17.07 17.68 - 8 11 11 9 57 Clayey sand, brown, micaceous, several large shale fragments, micaceous (sample wet due to driller adding water to hole) Predominantly sandstone, some shale inclusions, tan/brown, friable, micaceous (sample wet due to driller adding water) Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Abandon/Grout Boring: Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Rig: Drilling Company: Drill Method: Central Star Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: 17.68 Predominently sandstone, tan to brown, weathered, occasional coal streaks, micaceous, Auger refusal Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: 3 Page: Sample No. 11/18/15 Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Drill Crew: HSA / Split Spoon BH-5-15 Roxana Prison Date: Project No.: CARD138 Depth (m) From To 18.29 Test Boring No.: Location: 1st 2nd 3rd 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 4 6 27 of 3 4th 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m Rec. (%) 50/0.08 Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) Abandon/Grout Boring: SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: Rig: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Drill Method: Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Drilling Company: Test Boring No.: Location: Depth (m) From To Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: 0.00 0.61 Brown organic material grading to silty clay, moist, shale fragments with plant impressions, moderate plasticity, moist, slightly weathered tan to grey 0.61 1.22 Silty clay with coal laminations, tan to dark grey, top weathered, slightly moist, slightly organic at top (top 0.335 m sampled) (Sample SS-1) 1.22 1.83 Silty clay, moist, dark grey, scattered coal pieces, moderately weathered, shale fragments, slightly plastic 1.83 2.44 2.44 Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Page: Sample No. 11/17/15 Date: Drill Crew: HSA / Split Spoon BH-6-15 Roxana Prison 1st 1 2nd 3rd of 4th 2 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m 0.152 m Rec. (%) - 3 6 5 9 81 SS-1 6 14 11 8 95 - 8 8 11 9 63 Silty clay with coal and carbonaceous shale layers, dark grey, moist, moderate plasticity, scattered sandstone fragments (Sample SS-2) SS-2 2 5 6 9 66 3.05 Silty clay with coal and carbonaceous shale layers, dark grey, moist, moderate plasticity, scattered sandstone fragments - 4 3 6 5 47 3.05 3.66 Intermixed silty clay and sandstone, slightly moist, coal fragments throughout, mostly non-plastic, light grey (sandstone) to dark grey (Sample SS-3) SS-3 8 8 5 23 52 3.66 4.27 Silty clay and sand, slightly moist, dark grey, very slight plasticity, shale and occasional sandstone fragments - 12 11 12 7 55 4.27 4.88 Silty sand, very slightly moist, predominantly light gray sandstone with occasional dark grey shale fragments, non-plastic, thin orange zone at immediate base - 34 15 11 19 77 4.88 5.49 SS-4 11 4 12 8 65 5.49 6.10 SS-5 7 4 6 8 69 6.10 6.71 Silty clay with some sandy zones, fairly moist, some tan to orange coloring but mostly dark grey, shale and occasional sandstone fragments (Sample SS-4) Silty clay with some siltstone/shale fragments throughout, rare sandstone fragments, dark grey, moist, medium plasticity in silty zones, moderate orange staining downward, large wood fragments at base Predominantly wood stump with thin silty clay at base - 25 4 6 5 52 6.71 7.32 No recovery (possible wood stump?) - 3 4 4 5 0 7.32 7.92 Clay with sandstone boulder, moist, brown to tan, sandstone is weathered with red-orange coloration, clay is plastic - 5 5 4 5 40 7.92 8.53 Brown clay matrix with occasional sandstone and coal fragments, sandstone is weathered and occasional red, plastic (Sample SS-6) SS-6 3 3 2 4 58 9.14 From 8.53 m - 8.84 m: Brown clay matrix with occasional sandstone and coal fragments, sandstone is weathered and occasional red, plastic From 8.84 m - 9.14 m: Silty clay, dark grey, very slightly moist, nonplastic, occasional shale and red sandstone fragments - 3 33 3 14 55 8.53 Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Abandon/Grout Boring: Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) TEST BORING FIELD LOG Project Name: Logged By: BoP, Letcher County EIS, Roxana Prison Site Steve Stansfield CME850 Rig: Drilling Company: Drill Method: Test Boring No.: Location: Project No.: CARD138 Central Star Depth (m) From To Soil Visual Classification / Descriptions and Remarks Surface Condition: 9.14 9.75 9.75 10.36 10.36 Intermixed silty clay and sandstone, coal zone, numerous shale and 10.97 sandstone fragments, slightly moist, non-plastic (Sample SS-8) 11/17/15 Date: Andrew Risner/Richard Knisley Drill Crew: HSA / Split Spoon BH-6-15 Roxana Prison 2 Page: 1st 2nd 3rd of 2 4th 5th 0.152 m 0.152 m Rec. (%) Sample No. 0.152 m Silty clay, dark grey, numerous shale fragments, mostly dry and nonplastic, coal fragments near base (Sample SS-7) SS-7 26 19 7 5 35 Dark grey, silty clay at immediate top, light grey sandstone in bottom three-quarters, micaceous, dry, non-plastic - 7 17 12 10 45 SS-8 8 11 22 14 65 10.97 Top 0.30 m: Intermixed silty clay and sandstone, coal zone, numerous shale and sandstone fragments, slightly moist, non11.58 plastic Bottom 0.30 m: Clayey silt with shale fragments, some very faint orange stains, moist, plastic - 12 29 8 7 87 11.58 Silty clay, moist, tan to dark grey, numerous small diameter red12.19 orange inclusions, occasional coal fragments, moderate plasticity (Sample SS-9) SS-9 6 5 6 5 92 12.19 12.80 Silty clay, moist, tan to dark grey, numerous small diameter redorange inclusions, occasional coal fragments, moderate plasticity - 4 7 8 6 90 12.80 13.41 Predominantly sandstone, weathered tan to light grey with rare redorange zones, mostly dry and non-plastic - 7 6 14 7 67 13.41 14.02 Highly weathered sandstone with clay zones, micaceous, some green sandstone at base, moist - 6 13 10 9 90 14.02 14.63 Claystone, dark gray, moist, plastic, occasional coal incluions - 4 9 15 50/0.08 70 14.63 14.69 Siltstone, grey, unweathered, Auger Refusal - 50/0.08 - - - Total Boring Depth: Water Levels: 0.152 m 0.152 m Comments: [Drill Method, Boring Diameter, UD Shelby Tubes, Well Construction (draw sketch on back), etc] @ First Noted in Samples / Cuttings @ Completion Hammer Type: Donut Hammer / Safety Hammer / Automatic Hammer @ _____ After _______Hrs SPT Hammer: (Weight / Drop / Spoon Dia.) @ Backfilling ___________ (date/ time) Auger Dia.: ID / OD (meters): Drilling Times: Moving: HSA - Hollow Stem Augers ST - Shelby Tube Sample Drilling: MD - Rotary Mud Drilling WOR - SPT Weight of Rods Standby: REF - Refusal (Spoon or Auger) WOH - SPT Weight of Hammer Hauling Water: RC - Rock Core REC - Recovery (Meters) Abandon/Grout Boring: SS - SPT Split Spoon Sample RQD - Rock Quality Designation Fluid Losses: @ Depth DC - Driven Casing (Hammer Type and Record Blows/ft vs. Depth) Results of Investigation of Materials to be Excavated at the Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp, Roxana Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Prepared for: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons Roxana Prison Site, Letcher County, Kentucky Appendix F ACID-BASE ACCOUNTING RESULTS January 2016 Cardno, Inc. 16