Skip navigation

Employment and Training Institute, Indicators of Neighborhood Need in Zipcode 53206, 2007

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
New Indicators of Neighborhood
Need in Zipcode 53206
Neighborhood Indicators of Employment and Economic Well-Being
of Families, Barriers to Employment, and Untapped Opportunities

PREPARED BY
Lois M. Quinn
Employment and Training Institute,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

posted at www.eti.uwm.edu

2007

Introduction
Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators Reports were developed by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Employment and Training Institute with funding from the Greater Milwaukee Foundation and the City of
Milwaukee Community Development Grant Administration to provide independent, timely and ongoing
assessment tools to measure short-term and long-term progress toward improving economic and
employment well-being of families in central city Milwaukee neighborhoods. Indicators track changes by
neighborhood since 1993, prior to the beginning of state and federal welfare reform.
The 53206 zipcode neighborhood serves as a bellwether for poverty changes in Milwaukee and
nationally. In the 1990s prior to welfare reform in Wisconsin it had the largest number of families
receiving AFDC. In the 2000 Census it showed the largest number of families in poverty among
Milwaukee zipcodes.

This 2007 publication introduces two new sections addressing critical (and

previously unexamined) issues facing the neighborhood: the unprecedented increases in subprime and
high-interest rate housing loans to neighborhood residents and investors, and the growing population
of ex-offenders of prime working age in the neighborhood. These new measures stand in sharp contrast
with prior indicators which have generally shown relatively slow downturns and in some cases modest
improvements.

The new analyses, however, show substantial movement in a negative direction,

particularly in the last 4-5 years as prisoners released to these neighborhoods have risen dramatically and
subprime lending for refinancing mortgages has escalated. The new indicators shed much light on the
immense challenges facing the 53206 zipcode neighborhood. The indicators reveal interrelationships
between staggeringly high rates of incarceration (and recidivism) for the male population, the reliance of
many families on single-parent lower-income wage earners, the availability of subprime loans providing
cash income but often issued to families lacking means to meet the adjustable payment schedules, and
increases in market prices for single family and duplex houses whose future is tied to national stalls in
housing values and concurrent financial problems of subprime lenders.
At the same time, assets are identified, including a relatively high rate of home ownership for single
family houses, untapped retail spending (much of which is now leaving the neighborhood), the growth of
child care businesses, increases in individuals reporting full or partial self-employment, and government
economic supports for families (including child care subsidies, the federal and state earned income tax
credits, FoodShare benefits, and medical assistance coverage).
This 53206 publication is the first of the 2007 series of nine neighborhood indicator reports for central
city Milwaukee. Reports are posted on the ETI website at www.eti.uwm.edu.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

1

Findings
Neighborhood Indicators: Challenges and Assets
Page
Housing

ª
ª
ª
ª
©
ª
©
ª

78% of Recent Housing Loans to Owner-Occupants Are Subprime or High-Interest

7

Majority of Housing Loans to Owner-Occupants Are for Refinancing

9

Nearly Half of Housing Loans Are for Investors

11

60 Subprime Lenders Operating in Zipcode 53206

14

Housing Prices Jumped 50% and More in Last 3 Years

26

Decline in % of Owner-Occupied Single-Family Houses

27

Increase in % of Owner-Occupied Duplexes

27

Few Families Can Support Home Purchases at Current Prices

28

Return of Prison Population

ª
ª
ª

2,500 Ex-Offenders Living in Zipcode, 336% Increase in Annual Releases

16

53% Recidivism Rate for Adults Released from State Correctional Facilities

20

4% of Ex-Offenders Have Valid Driver’s License, 63% Not High School Grads

20

Family Income

©
©
©

ª
ª
ª
ª

Fewer Working Age Tax Filers, Total Income Down 10%

30

Over 90% of Family Income Tax Filers Are Single-Parent

32

Many Single Parents Have Lower-Wage or Part-Time Earnings

33

Over Half of Working Families Have Incomes Below Poverty

36

Earned Income Tax Credits for Families Bring in $14.8 Million

39

Neighborhood has Very High Claim Rates for the EIC

41

Families Are Still Borrowing Against Their EIC Tax Refunds, % Down

43

Economic Supports for Families

ª
ª
§¨
§¨
©

AFDC/W-2 Cases Vs. Single Parent Income Tax Filers

45

Only 642 Families Receive W-2 Cash Assistance

47

3,357 Families Receive FoodShares Benefits, Down from Prior Year

49

4,080 Families Receive Subsidized Medical Assistance, Down from Prior Year

50

Child Care Subsidies Provide $1.2 Million Monthly for 1,056 Families

51

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

2

Economic Development

©
§¨
©
ª

Child Care Is a Growing Business in 53206

54

Business Activity in 53206: Employees Down, Payrolls Up Slightly

56

High Residential Purchasing Power for Basic Consumer Needs

60

2/3 of Residents’ Retail Spending Leaves the Neighborhood

61

Workforce Growth

©
ª
©

ª
ª

50% Growth of Self-Employed Tax Filers in 3 Years

59

Labor Market Is Very Limited for Most 53206 Residents

62

Driver’s License Suspensions Down

65

90% of Jobs in the Zipcode Are Held by Non-Residents

67

Majority of Workers at 53206 Jobsites Are White, Resident Workforce Is Black

68

New Indicator Findings: Mortgage Lending Practices in Zipcode 53206
1. Subprime loans (46%) and high-interest loans (32%) make up over three-fourths (78%) of the
mortgage loans issued for owner-occupants in 2005, according to a special analysis of mortgage
lending practices in zipcode 53206. The growth of these costly high risk mortgages has been
fueled by dramatic increases in housing prices, even in the poorest neighborhoods, and promotion
of mortgage loans for cash-strapped residents.

Subprime loans are typically made to individuals with poor credit histories, offer less favorable
terms of repayment (often with low initial interest rates escalating into higher payment schedules
2-3 years after the mortgage is issued), may involve high fees and prepayment penalties, often do
not include escrow accounts for property taxes and insurance, and may not verify the income and
capability of the borrower to meet the mortgage payments.

2. Refinancing loans have exceeded the number of home purchases each year since 1994 in zipcode
53206. In 2005, the last year for which data is available, zipcode 53206 recorded 372 refinancing
loans for owner-occupants, a high for the eleven years analyzed. These refinancing mortgages
offer new found cash and illusory relief for consolidating credit card and other debts, but put
owners’ entire home equity in jeopardy if they cannot make their payments.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

3

3. A number of the subprime lenders operating in zipcode 53206 have recently been reported as
having serious financial problems, facing possible bankruptcy, and under investigation by
government agencies in other states. A total of 62 subprime lenders issued 932 housing loans
totaling $55 million in 2004 and 2005 in zipcode 53206. (In 1993 only 11 subprime loans were
issued in the zipcode neighborhood.)

4. Foreclosure cases in January 2007 were heavily concentrated in zipcode 53206. In January 2007
the Milwaukee County courts listed 377 foreclosure cases on file for properties in the City of
Milwaukee for one month alone, and 75 of these (20%) were in zipcode 53206. As the subprime
lending industry faces a growing national crisis and housing prices stall, further increases in
foreclosures may be seen in zipcode 53206.

New Indicator Findings: Returning Prisoners in Zipcode 53206
1. Nearly two-thirds (62%) of men ages 30-34 from zipcode 53206 have been incarcerated in state
Department of Corrections facilities or are currently incarcerated, according to a first-time
analysis of the population of adults incarcerated in state DOC facilities (from January 1993
through June 2006).

2. An estimated 2,500 adults now living in zipcode 53206 were previously incarcerated in state
Department of Corrections facilities from 1993 to 2006. Adults, mostly male (89%) and nearly
all African American (like the neighborhood population which is 97% African American), face
major barriers which impact their chances of reuniting with their families and securing regular
employment. Only 4% showed a valid driver’s license with no suspensions or revocations, and
63% had not completed high school or obtained a GED. Government policies instituted for the
population of felons with drug-related convictions prevent many from moving into subsidized
housing or from obtaining Pell grants to attend vocational courses, college or other postsecondary education training.

3. Zipcode 53206 has seen a dramatic 336% increase in the number of adults released from prison
since 1993 when 201 were released to 879 released in 2005. The number serving time and
released for “drug offense only” has increased five-fold, from 43 in 1993 to 255 in 2005.

4. Many of the adults released subsequently return to prison. Recidivism rates of 53% were
reported for those ages 25-34.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

4

Neighborhood Indicators Report
Special Analysis of Mortgage Lending Practices in 53206
The national fallout related to proliferation of subprime loans, particularly targeted to
lower-income residents, will have an unprecedented impact on home equity in zipcode
53206, where hundreds of residents and investors have acquired such mortgages.
Approved loans were examined for houses in zipcode 53206 for the period from 1993
through 2001 and 2003 through 2005, using the last available Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act (HMDA) data files. Three types of loans are involved: home purchase mortgages,
refinancing loans (allowing a present mortgage holder to acquire a new loan either for
more favorable borrowing terms or to acquire cash based on the increased market value
of the borrower’s home), and loans for home improvements.

For the purpose of this analysis, housing loans are identified as “subprime” if they are
issued by a lender considered by HUD (the Department of Housing and Urban
Development) to be a subprime lender.

Subprime loans are typically made to

individuals with poor credit histories, and offer less favorable terms of repayment (often
with lower initial interest rates that escalate into higher – and usually adjustable – interest
rates 2 to 3 years after the loan is first made). These mortgages offer considerable risk to
the borrower. In many cases, payment schedules do not provide for escrow payments for
taxes and insurance, the lending company fails to adequately verify the income and
capability of the borrower to meet future escalating payment requirements, the loans
involve high fees and prepayment penalties, and borrowers do not realize the long-term
costs of the loan.

Of particular concern are refinancing mortgages made for houses that are already
partially paid for, where borrowers acquire immediate cash based on equity in their home
and its increased market value since they acquired their first mortgage. This cash may be
used to consolidate credit-card or other debts, but puts the borrower’s home at risk if
mortgage payments are not met. In the last few years, with housing prices rising even in
the poorest neighborhoods, borrowers unable to meet their current mortgage (or credit
card) payments have been encouraged to refinance their home mortgages. For most
property owners, the dramatic increases in their home’s value have made it a source of

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

5

new wealth.

The gains in home assessed values, however, may be illusory when

homeowners are unable to meet their escalating mortgage payments and forced into
foreclosure or sale of their property at prices well below the value of the mortgage – thus
losing their lifetime savings.

In other cases, low-income residents may secure housing loans from non subprime
lenders, but at higher interest rates because of the borrower’s poor credit rating (and/or
the shorter length of the loan). These high interest rate loans are also a concern when
minority and poor neighborhoods are hit by hither rates of interest than other residential
areas. Since 2004, the HMDA data files allow identification of high interest rate loans
(e.g., loans which are more than 3 points above Treasury Rates for first liens and more
than 5 points for second liens).

ƒ

There were almost no subprime mortgages (11 loans) issued in zipcode 53206 in
1993. Subprime lending began increasing through the 1990s and had reached 425
loans in 1998. By 2005 a total of 533 subprime loans were reported. Additionally,
251 high interest rate loans (non subprime) were identified in 2004 and 356 reported
in 2005.

Number of Housing Loans in Zipcode 53206: HMDA Reported
1,400
1,200
1,000
800

Other (regular)
High-interest rate*

600

Subprime loans

400

*High-interest rate
(non-subprime).

200
0
1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2003

2004

2005

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

6

Subprime Loans to Owner-Occupants
Residents in the poorest areas of the city are frequently the target of subprime lending.
ƒ

Subprime loans to owner-occupants in zipcode 53206 soared to 344 by 1998,
accounting for 65% of all housing loans to owner-occupants that year. By 2005
subprime loans accounted for 46% of the mortgages while an additional 32% of loans
were at the high-interest rates level. In sharp contract, subprime loans to owneroccupants in the Milwaukee County suburbs rose to 2,218 by 2005, but only
accounted for 13% of housing loans to owner-occupants in the suburbs.

ƒ

The monetary amount of the subprime lending to owner-occupants in zipcode 53206
rose quickly, so that by 1998 $10.1 million in subprime loans were issued to owneroccupants and by 2005 the total of subprime housing loans had reached $19.2
million.

Dollar Total of Housing Loans for Owner-Occupied Houses in Zipcode 53206
$45,000,000
$40,000,000
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$0
1993
Other (regular loans)

1994

1995

High-interest rate*

1996

1997

1998

Subprime loans

1999

2000

2001

2003

2004

2005

*High-interest rate (non-subprime).

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

7

Subprime Loans to Investors (Non Owner-Occupants)
ƒ

Housing loans for investor-owned (i.e., non owner-occupied) houses in the 53206
neighborhood grew gradually from $1.1 million (56 loans) in 1993 to $3.7 million
(123 loans) in 2000. Then by 2005 the number of loans had escalated to 578
properties, with mortgages totaling $33.3 million.

ƒ

The monetary value of subprime loans to investor-owned housing in zipcode 53206
showed dramatic increases in the last three years available: rising from $3.2 million
in subprime loans in 2003, to $7.8 million in 2004, and $14.2 million in subprime
loans in 2005.

During this same period, non-subprime high-interest rate loans

accounted for 110 mortgages valued at $4.8 million in 2004, and rising to 144
mortgages totaling $7.6 million in 2005.

Dollar Total of Housing Loans for Investor-Owned Properties in Zipcode 53206
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$0
1993
Other (regular loans)

1994

1995

1996

High-interest rate*

1997

1998

Subprime loans

1999

2000

2001

2003

2004

2005

*High-interest rate loans (non subprime).

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

8

Type of Loan Activity
The high increases in subprime loans were driven primarily by their relatively low initial
interest rates (with higher interest rates to follow) combined with spiraling increases in
the full value property assessments taking place in the poorest neighborhoods.
ƒ

The 53206 neighborhood showed a doubling of full value property tax assessment for
one-family houses from 2000 to 2006 and even higher market value increases (an
average 128% increase) for duplexes, making residents and landlords targets for
subprime lenders who could provide cash for refinancing of existing mortgages for
cash-strapped residents whose housing values had reported increases of $25,000 or
more. These refinancing loans provided new found cash and illusory relief for
consolidating credit card and other debts.

ƒ

Most lending activity for owner-occupied housing in the zipcode area in 2005 was for
home refinancing loans. In 2005, zipcode 53206 recorded 372 refinancing loans (a
high for the eleven years analyzed), followed by 223 home purchase loans. Home
repair loans, which had totaled 204 loans in 1993, were down to 78 in 2005.

Types of Home Loans Issued for Owner-Occupied Housing
in Zipcode 53206: HMDA Data
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

Home purchase

1998

1999

2000

Home repair loans

2001

2003

2004

2005

Refinancing

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

9

ƒ

During this same period, refinancing loans for non-owner occupied houses in the
53206 neighborhood increased fifteen-fold from 18 in 1993 to 275 in 2005, of which
41% were subprime loans. The high numbers of these mortgages may reflect the real
estate flipping taking place during the last 3 to 4 years. In contrast, the Milwaukee
County suburbs showed almost no change in the number of refinancing loans for
non-owner occupied homes.
Types of Home Loans Issued for Investor-Owned Properties
in Zipcode 53206: HMDA Data
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

Home purchase

1998

1999

2000

Home repair loans

2001

2003

2004

2005

Refinancing

Type of Borrowers
ƒ

The majority of housing loans in zipcode 53206 were made to single purchasers
rather than 2-person buyers, and the big jumps in home loans in 2004 and 2005
involved single rather than 2-person co-signers. These trends are consistent with
concerns about the largely single-parent families of the neighborhood seeking out or
being targeted for housing loans (including refinancing loans) they can ill-afford.

ƒ

Single person loans made up 82% of mortgage loans issued to owner-occupants in
zipcode 53206 in 2005.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

10

Single Vs. 2-Person Loans: Owner-Occupied Houses in Zipcode 53206
600

500

400
1-Person Loan

300

2-Person Loan

200

100

0
1993

ƒ

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2003

2004

2005

Not only has lending activity increased for residents, but investors have also shown
jumps in the numbers of their housing loans in the last three years.

By 2005

mortgages to investors (i.e., non owner occupants) made up nearly half (46%) of total
housing loans issued in zipcode 53205.

Housing Loans to Owner-Occupants Vs. Investors in Zipcode 53206
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

Owner Occupied

1999

2000

2001

2003

2004

2005

Non Owner Occupied

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

11

Foreclosure Activity
The low interest rates for the first years of subprime loans are initially tempting but when
higher payment requirements kick in after the first few years, many families are caught
short. Some owners refinance again based on continuing increases in the assessed values
of their property. Once the housing market stalled, however, and the subprimes got hit,
so did the mortgage holders, especially those in poorer neighborhoods.
ƒ

By January 2007, the Milwaukee County courts listed 377 foreclosure cases on file
for properties in the City of Milwaukee for one month alone. These cases were
heavily concentrated in the city’s poorest neighborhoods, with 75 foreclosure cases
(20% of the total) for properties in zipcode 53206.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

12

Source: UWM Employment and Training Institute analysis of circuit court records.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

13

Subprime Lenders Operating in Zipcode 53206
ƒ

A total of 60 subprime lenders were selling mortgage loans for houses in zipcode
53206 in 2004 and 2005, the most recent years available. Subprime housing loans in
the zipcode neighborhood totaled $55 million in the 2-year period for 932 loans.

ƒ

In zipcode 53206 the biggest subprime lender was Argent Mortgage Company (of
Irving, CA), which made 288 loans totaling $18 million during the 2-year period.

ƒ

The table below shows the 43 subprime lenders with $100,000 or more in housing
loans in zipcode 53206 in 2004 and 2005. A number of these subprime lenders have
recently been reported as having serious financial problems, facing possible
bankruptcy, and under investigation by government agencies in other states.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

14

Subprime Lenders Issuing Housing Loans in Zipcode 53206 in 2004 and 2005
SUBPRIME LENDERS IN 53206

2004

2005

Total

Total Loans

Total Loans
Lenders with at Least $100,000 in Loans in 53206
ARGENT MORTGAGE COMPANY LLC
LONG BEACH MORTGAGE CO.
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATI
FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN
WELLS FARGO FINL WISCONSIN INC
AAMES FUNDING CORPORATION
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY
CITIFINANCIAL, INC.
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP
OWNIT MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC
CHASE MANHATTAN BK USA NA
DELTA FUNDING CORPORATION
MILA, INC.
ENCORE CREDIT CORP
FRANKLIN MORTGAGE FUNDING
MARIBELLA MORTGAGE, LLC.
THE ANYLOAN COMPANY
WMC MORTGAGE CORP.
THE CIT GROUP/CONSUMER FINANCE
FINANCE AMERICA, LLC
HFC
RESMAE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
AIG FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
PROVIDENT BANK
ACOUSTIC HOME LOANS, LLC
EQUIFIRST CORPORATION
PEOPLE'S CHOICE FINANCIAL CORP
MORTGAGE LENDERS NETWORK USA
BENEFICIAL
AEGIS LENDING CORPORATION
OAK STREET MORTGAGE
CENTEX HOME EQUITY COMPANY LLC
CITIFINANCIAL MTG CO, INC
DECISION ONE MORTGAGE
CITICORP TRUST BANK, FSB
FIELDSTONE MORTGAGE COMPANY
AEGIS FUNDING CORPORATION
NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC.
ADVANCED FINANCIAL SERVICES IN
FIRST NLC FINANCIAL SERVICES
NEW FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORP
MBNA AMERICA (DELAWARE), N.A.
JLM DIRECT FUNDING LTD

399

533

932

$55,390,000

149
33
18
12
14
16
12
22
9
0
2
4
6
4
12
0
0
0
4
13
8
0
3
9
0
2
4
3
6
5
3
4
1
4
1
2
0
1
1
1
0
1
0

139
72
42
37
14
14
9
19
15
16
20
15
14
9
0
12
5
11
7
0
0
9
4
0
6
4
3
3
0
1
1
1
3
0
3
1
3
2
2
3
2
1
2

288
105
60
49
28
30
21
41
24
16
22
19
20
13
12
12
5
11
11
13
8
9
7
9
6
6
7
6
6
6
4
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
2
2
2

$18,009,000
$5,714,000
$3,932,000
$3,114,000
$1,858,000
$1,751,000
$1,489,000
$1,478,000
$1,446,000
$1,164,000
$1,094,000
$1,034,000
$870,000
$790,000
$756,000
$687,000
$643,000
$640,000
$624,000
$589,000
$538,000
$503,000
$497,000
$400,000
$396,000
$373,000
$360,000
$359,000
$348,000
$326,000
$280,000
$262,000
$239,000
$226,000
$216,000
$201,000
$197,000
$175,000
$175,000
$170,000
$168,000
$154,000
$100,000

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

15

Special Analysis of the Returning Prison Population

The absence of many males of prime workforce age and the numbers of men incarcerated
and released from state correctional facilities each year have tremendous impact on the
earnings and stability of families. This first-time analysis examines the Department of
Corrections public inmate data file of detailed information on each incarceration and
release of adult inmates from state correctional facilities from January 1, 1993 through
June 30, 2006, and uses DOC and other data files to assess demographic characteristics as
well the history of violations resulting in incarceration.

The DOC file identifies

individuals in the Wisconsin Department of Corrections system but does not include
other inmates in the House of Corrections or city jail. Data entries for admission and
release from DOC facilities are for any reason, including alternatives to revocation or for
temporary probation and parole holds.
ƒ

Since 1993, the number of individuals being released from state adult correctional
facilities in zipcode 53206 has grown dramatically from 201 in 1993 to 879 in 2005,
a 336% increase. Many subsequently return to prison.

Individuals Released from Adult State Correctional Facilities Each Year:
Zipcode 53206
1000
880

900

854

879

775

800
700
600
500

446

476

460

2000

2001

398
400
300
201

239

275

272

1995

1996

298

200
100
0
1993

1994

1997

1998

1999

2002

2003

2004

2005

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

16

ƒ Most of those incarcerated are males. The number of men released in zipcode 53206
has risen from 186 in 1993 to 816 in 2005 (with another 387 men released in the first
half of 2006). The number of women released rose from 15 in 1993 to 63 in 2005.
Gender of Persons Released from Adult State Correctional Facilities:
Zipcode 53206
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Males

ƒ

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Females

For most major crime areas, the numbers released each year in 53206 have tripled,
although for individuals charged with “drug offenses only” the numbers have
increased at an even higher rate (a 493% increase from 1993 to 2005).
Type of Crimes for Persons Released from Adult State Correctional Facilities:
Zipcode 53206
1000

800

600

400

200

0
1993

1994

1995

All Crimes

1996

1997

1998

Assault Crimes

1999

2000

2001

Drug Offenses

2002

2003

2004

2005

Sexual Assault Crimes

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

17

ƒ

In 2005 a total of 403 individuals were released from state adult correctional facilities
with prior assault crimes, the highest number in the 13 years studied.

Persons Released from Adult State Correctional Facilities with Assault
Offenses: Zipcode 53206
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1993

ƒ

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

The number of individuals serving time and released after incarceration for “drug
offenses only” has increased five-fold, from 43 in 1993 to 255 in 2005 (and another
105 in the first half of 2006).

Persons Released from Adult State Correctional Facilities with Drugs Only
Offenses: Zipcode 53206
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

18

ƒ

The population which receives the greatest media attention is sex offenders. The
number of individuals released after conviction for sex offenses is significant but
relatively low – 13 in 1993, rising to a high of 86 in 2003 and at 51 releases in 2005.
Persons Released from Adult State Correctional Facilities with Sexual Assault
Offenses: Zipcode 53206
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Multiple Barriers to Employment for Resident Ex-Offenders
An estimated 2,506 individuals are now living in zipcode 53206 who were previously
incarcerated in state Department of Corrections facilities. This estimate may be on
the low end as only 90% of DOC prisoners from Milwaukee County had a zipcode
location of release.
ƒ

This previously incarcerated population includes 2,233 men (89% of the total) and
273 women.

ƒ

Like the neighborhood (which is 97% African American), nearly all of the exoffenders are African Americans.

An analysis by the Employment and Training Institute examined the barriers facing
Milwaukee County adults released from or currently in Wisconsin Department of
Corrections (DOC) facilities.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

19

Major barriers to employment were identified for the 2,506 ex-offenders in zipcode
53206 who have been released from state correctional facilities.
ƒ

High recidivism rates of 53% were found for those ages 25 through 29 and 53% for
those ages 30 through 34. Thus, over half return to state correctional facilities one or
more times.
Released Population from State Correctional Facilities: Zipcode 53206
Recidivism Rate
(25-34 yr. olds)

53%

ƒ

Driver's License Status

Schooling

Less
than 12
years
63%

Valid
license,
no
susp. or
revoc.
4%

Low levels of educational achievement were shown, with 63% having less than 12
years of schooling and no degree, 19% with a GED or high school equivalency
credential, 11% with a high school diploma and no college, and 7% with postsecondary education beyond high school. Government policies instituted for the

population of felons with drug-related convictions may prevent many from
obtaining Pell grants to attend vocational education classes, college, and other
post-secondary education programs.
ƒ

Almost none (i.e., only 4%) of the released population living in 53206 had a driver’s
license with no suspensions or revocations.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

20

Male-Female Population Imbalances Due to Incarceration
Given the high numbers of adult males from zipcode 53206 who are incarcerated, the
neighborhood shows large imbalances between men and women residents. In addition to
the expected differences in the numbers of males relative to females at the older (i.e.,
senior citizen) ages, African American residents of zipcode 53206 show significant
imbalances between males and females beginning in the teenage years.
ƒ

In zipcode 53206, the number of African American males and females the census
reports living in zipcode 53206 are about equal for the populations 0-15 years.
Beginning in the mid-teenage years 15-19, however, the population of males declines
to only 92% of the female population.

ƒ

By their early twenties, the number of males in zipcode 53206 is only 74% of the
numbers in the female population. The ratio worsens even further for the population
of adults in their early 30s, where males show only 64% of the numbers of females
(ages 30-34).

Gender of Residents in Zipcode 53206 by Age

2,000
Males

1,500

Females
1,000
500
0
<5

5-9

10-14 15-20 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

21

ƒ

For males in the age 30-34 year cohort, where men make up only 64% of the
numbers of women residing in the neighborhood, almost 1/3 of the male population
can be accounted for as incarcerated in state or local correctional facilities. Adding
men from the state correctional facilities who are still incarcerated to the census
estimates accounts for much of the imbalance between men and women in 53206. If
the number of men without a DOC zipcode address (and also not showing a driver’s
license match) could be ascertained, the imbalance between men and women would
be explained even further.

Age and Gender of Residents of Zipcode 53206: 2000 Census
Age in 2000
Under 5 years
5-9 years
10-14 years
15-20 years

Males

Females

Males Per
100 Females

1,622
1,946
1,951
1,519

1,556
1,963
1,931
1,644

104
99
101
92

20-24 years
25-29 years

859
845

1,163
1,172

74
72

30-34 years
35-39 years

779
901

1,208
1,286

64
70

40-44 years
45-49 years

945
799

1,178
943

80
85

50-54 years
55-59 years

593
440

846
671

70
66

60-64 years
65-69 years

435
392

622
606

70
65

70-74 years
75-79 years
80-84 years
85 and above

375
227
102
57

529
349
214
200

71
65
48
29

14,787

18,081

82

Total

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

22

Almost 2/3 of Males Ages 30-34 Have Been in Imprisoned in State Facilities
When those men in prison who have a zipcode address of 53206 are added to those
reported by the census as living in the zipcode (including men previously released from
state correctional facilities, as well as men who have never spent time in an adult DOC
facility), the dimension of the problem becomes startlingly clear.
ƒ

For the 30 to 34 year old age group, 21% of the men from 53206 are reported in
a state DOC facility, another 42% were previously incarcerated in a state
correctional facility, and only 38% were never in an adult state correctional
facility.

Prison Status of Men Ages 30-34 from Zipcode 53206

Living in
neighborhood
- never in
state prison
38%

In WI
correctional
facility
21%

Previously in
WI
correctional
facility
41%

The Employment and Training Institute identified a number of steps that could be
immediately taken to address the employment barriers for ex-offenders in Milwaukee
County.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

23

from Barriers to Employment: Prison Time by John Pawasarat, University of WisconsinMilwaukee Employment and Training Institute, 2007. Funded by Legal Action of Wisconsin
and the Private Industry Council of Milwaukee County.

Released prisoners are one of the most difficult populations to serve and least likely to be successfully
engaged in sustained employment due to persistent legal problems, low education attainment levels, high
recidivism rates, and driver’s license suspension and revocation problems. The stigma of being an exinmate alone and the limitations it places on those released and expected to become gainfully employed
are compounded by further legal sanctions placed on those who have spent time in correctional facilities.
Parents and non-parents released from DOC facilities face major barriers which impact their chances of
reuniting with their families and securing regular employment.
-

Housing barriers face those released from prison and applying for public housing subsidies.
Some may not be eligible at all for subsidized housing, while others are subject to the practice of
sharing criminal records with Section 8 landlords.

-

Education barriers have been instituted for the population of felons with drug-related
convictions which prevent them from obtaining Pell grants to attend vocational education classes,
college, and other post-secondary education programs.

-

Income maintenance barriers are most severe for those with drug convictions, making them
ineligible for food stamps or TANF services.

The driver’s license status and low educational levels of the populations stand in sharp contrast to the
limited number of jobs available in the neighborhoods where these prisoners are released. Previous ETI
research on the welfare-to-work population has shown the driver’s license to be more important than
educational status in accessing and retaining employment. The most recent May 2006 employer job
survey (conducted by the UWM Employment and Training Institute for the Private Industry Council of
Milwaukee County) found that three-fourths of the job openings in the metro area were located in areas not
easily accessed by public transportation. In the CDBG (Community Development Block Grant-targeted)
central city Milwaukee neighborhoods where most prisoners are released, the survey showed a job gap of 7 to
1, that is, 7 jobseekers for every 1 full-time job available. Further, ex-offenders seeking work in these (and
other) neighborhoods must compete with jobseekers who have a valid driver’s license and who do not have a
prison record.

Recommendations
1. The DOC should assess the driver’s license status of prisoners immediately upon their entry to
the DOC facilities as part of an employability plan to target those most likely to benefit from
license restoration initiatives. Those prisoners should be identified who will be required to serve a
waiting period after application for their driver’s license so that the application wait period can be
served during incarceration in the DOC facility.
2. The state Department of Corrections should redirect existing remediation and reentry resources to
launch an in-house driver’s license restoration initiative which would:
-

Prepare inmates to take the written driver’s license test.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

24

-

Allow inmates to apply for a driver’s license if they do not have a current license.

-

Assign Department of Transportation staff to administer the driver’s license written test prior to
release.

-

Schedule appointments for the road test immediately upon release.

-

Create a way for inmates to work off reinstatement and application fees through prison work
programs or points for good behavior.

3. The state Department of Workforce Development should document the pre- and postemployment experience of adults released from and admitted to DOC facilities using the state
Department of Workforce Development wage match data to gauge the effectiveness of post-release
employment initiatives and to identify populations most likely to benefit from pre-employment and
driver’s license initiatives.
4. The City of Milwaukee should examine the negative cost impacts of City of Milwaukee imposed
suspension-related fines on both the released and incarcerated populations. The City of
Milwaukee is responsible for most of the driver’s license suspensions in Milwaukee County using
suspension orders for failures to pay fines not related to serious driving violations.
5. Leadership and coordination between the Department of Corrections, the Department of Workforce
Development, the Private Industry Council and community partners are necessary to target sufficient
direct services to the DOC population in Milwaukee County
6. Given the concentration of ex-offenders in Milwaukee, increased funding is needed for education
and training support for Milwaukee residents who are ex-offenders.
Barriers to Employment: Prison Time examines the legal and transportation needs of 37,080 Milwaukee
County adults current or previously incarcerated in state correctional facilities. The publication is
available online at www.eti.uwm.edu.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

25

ANNUAL NEIGHBORHOOD INDICATORS: CHALLENGES AND ASSETS
Housing Prices Jumped 50% and More in Last 3 Years
Housing Values 1993-2006
Housing prices rose markedly in zipcode 53206 during the last 3 years, according to full
value assessments shown in the city property file.

The rising market values have

increased the potential assets of current home owners but are limiting the ability of
renters to buy homes and may be fueling a glut of subprime loans issued to residents with
limited ability to repay these mortgages.
ƒ

The average value of a 3 bedroom house in zipcode 53206 increased from $26,826 in
2000 to $35,310 in 2003, and then jumped to a $53,225 average in 2006.

ƒ

The average market value of houses with 4 or more bedrooms went from $27,841 in
2000 to $36,495 in 2003 and then up to $57,043 in 2006.

ƒ

Duplexes showed the most dramatic price increases, rising nearly 80% in the
last 3 years. The average value of duplexes in zipcode 53206 rose from a very low
$27,782 in 2000 to $35,376 in 2003, and then up to $63,459 in 2006.
Average Housing Values in Zipcode 53206
$70,000

Equalized Assessed Value

.

$63,459
$60,000

$57,043
$53,225

$50,000
$42,459

$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$0
1994

1997
Duplexes

2000
Single, 4+ BR

2003
Single, 3 BR

2006
Single, 2 BR

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

26

Majority of Houses Are Owner-Occupied
Home Ownership Rates 1993-2006

Neighborhood housing data were tracked using City of Milwaukee property files.

The

zipcode had 3,421 single family houses and 3,432 duplexes in 2006. Nearly 3,900 of
these houses are owner-occupied.
ƒ

Contrary to popular misconceptions about the inner city, about two-thirds of single
family houses in zipcode 53206 are owner-occupied. The home ownership rate for
single family houses was 67% in 2006, down from 70% in 2003 and 69% in 2005.

ƒ

The home ownership rate for duplexes was at 49% in 2006, up from 46% in 2005.

Percent of Single Family and Duplex Homes Occupied by Owners
in Zipcode 53206
100%
80%

72%

71%

70%

70%

70%

70%

69%

69%

70%

69%

70%

69%

67%

49%

49%

48%

48%

48%

48%

48%

49%

49%

48%

49%

46%

49%

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2005

2006

60%
40%
20%
0%

Single family homes

Duplexes

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

27

Few Families Can Support Home Purchases at Current Prices
Family Income 1993-2006
Given the declining number of married families with income earnings in this zipcode and
the predominance of single-parent families, housing prices appear to be rising above the
capacity of renters in zipcode 53206 to afford them.
ƒ

The state income tax returns for tax filers with dependents showed very few filers
with income even at $25,000 or above. In the 2005 tax year, only 1,224 filers with
dependents (939 single filers and 285 married filers) had adjusted gross income of
$25,000 or above. This is only slightly above the number of filers with income of
$25,000 or above in 1993, when 456 single filers and 576 married filers reported
these income levels.

Zipcode 53206 Single Tax Filers (With Dependents)
with Income of $25,000 or Above
6,000

Number of Tax Filers

.

5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Income of $25,000 and above

ƒ

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Income under $25,000

Less than 300 married families with dependents had income of at least $25,000 in the
2005 tax year, again a very small number of families able to consider financing a
home purchase.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

28

Zipcode 53206 Married Tax Filers (With Dependents)
with Income of $25,000 or Above

Number of Tax Filers

.

6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Income of $25,000 and above

Income Under $25,000

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

29

Fewer Working Age Tax Filers, Total Income Down 10%
Income of Working Age Tax Filers 2000-2005
Wisconsin Department of Revenue income tax data are used to determine the total
adjusted gross income (AGI) and number of married and single income tax filers by
ranges of income. This analysis describes changes in income of working age (i.e., nonelderly and non-dependents) tax filers over the past five years and trends in income
earnings of single and married filers with dependents since 1993. The 2005 income data
is based on tax returns filed in 2006. See “Background Notes” for a description of data
sources, definitions, and limitations of the tax data used.
ƒ

The number of working age tax filers (single and married, with and without
dependents) decreased in zipcode 53206 by 15%, from 9,736 in 2000 to 8,228 in the
2005 tax year (i.e., taxes filed in 2006 based on earnings in 2005).

ƒ

The economic downturn showed different impacts by neighborhood. With a smaller
workforce and relatively stagnant incomes, this zipcode has shown continuing
declines in total income earnings since 2000. The total adjusted gross income of
working age tax filers decreased by 10.5% between 2000 and 2005, going from
$182.3 million to $163.1 million. During this same period, the cost of living, as
measured by the Consumer Price Index for the Milwaukee-Racine area, increased by
9.8%. When inflation is considered, the real income earnings of residents in
zipcode 53206 dropped by 18.5% over the 5-year period.

ƒ

This zipcode suffered the largest decrease in income among the central city
zipcodes analyzed.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

30

Total Adjusted Gross Income of Working Age Tax Filers
in Zipcode 53206 (in millions)
$182.3

$175.9

AGI (in millions of dollars)

.

$200

$169.3

$164.4

$163.6

$163.1

2002

2003

2004

2005

$150

$100

$50

$0
2000

ƒ

2001

The average income of single tax filers (with or without dependents) was $17,547 in
2005, up 10% from the average of $15,902 in the 2000 tax year. After controlling for
inflation the incomes remained nearly flat (with only an 0.5% improvement).

ƒ

The average income of married tax filers (with or without dependents) was $41,254
in 2005, up 2% from an average of $40,447 in the 2000 tax year. After controlling
for inflation, the average income for married tax filers showed a 6% decline.
Average Income (AGI) of Working Age Single and Married Tax Filers
(With and Without Dependents) in Zipcode 53206
Married Filers

Single Filers

$50,000
$20,000
$15,902

$17,547

$15,000

$40,447

$41,254

2000

2005

$40,000
$30,000

$10,000

$20,000

$5,000

$10,000
$0

$0
2000

2005

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

31

Over 90% of Family Income Tax Filers Are Single-Parent
Single Vs. Married Tax Filers with Dependents 1993-2005
The vast majority of state income tax filers with dependents in zipcode 53206 are single
rather than married filers. Only legally married couples may file joint married tax
returns. In some cases, other adult earners may be living in homes with single tax filers.
ƒ

The percentage of filers with dependents who are single rather than married filers
rose from 80% in 1993 to 91% in 2005, while married filers dropped from 20% in
1993 to 9% in 2005.

Single vs. Married Tax Filers with Dependents
in Zipcode 53206

86%

89%

89%

90%

90%

91%

91%

86%

89%

82%

84%

88%

80%

20%

18%

16%

14%

14%

12%

11%

11%

11%

10%

10%

9%

9%

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

Tax Year
Single Filers

ƒ

Married Filers

The total number of single tax filers with dependents peaked in the 1999 tax year (at
5,241 parents) and has been declining ever since. Since 1993 the number of married
income tax filers with dependents in zipcode 53206 – smaller to begin with – has
dropped in half. That decline is resulting from high rates of incarceration, along with
other possible factors including dissolution of marriages by divorce and death,
married families leaving the neighborhood, and families with grown children no
longer qualifying for IRS dependency status.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

32

Many Single Parents Have Lower-Wage or Part-Time Earnings
Income of Tax Filers with Dependents 1993-2005
ƒ

Analysis of the 4,824 single tax filers with dependents in 2005 by their income
category suggested that a large number of single parents in zipcode 53206 remain
only marginally employed. In 2005, a total of 684 single filers with dependents (14%
of the total) reported AGI below $5,000, and another 985 filers (20%) reported
income below $10,000. Only 11% of single parent filers earned $30,000 or more.

ƒ

Married filers were more likely to have higher combined incomes.

The 449 married

couples with dependents – although far fewer in number – were more likely to have
family-supporting incomes than the single heads of households in 2005. Over half
(61%) had income at or above $25,000, and 41% had income of $40,000 or more,
when income from all jobs is considered. Still, more than a fourth (27%) of married
filers with dependents showed incomes of under $20,000.

Income of Tax Filers with 1 or More Dependents in Zipcode 53206
(N=4,824 Single and 449 Married Filers)
1,800

1,669

1,628

.

1,600

Number of Families

1,400
1,200
975

1,000
800
600

326

400
200

54

67

75

71

132

46

94

136

0
Under $10,000

$10,000-19,999

$20,000-29,999

Single Filers

$30,000-39,999

$40,000-49,999

$50,000 and
above

Married Filers

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

33

ƒ

A similar picture emerges for the 2,955 working-age adult income tax filers without
dependents (that is, non-elderly tax filers who claim no dependents and are not
claimed as dependents on another tax form). The vast majority (81%) of single filers
report income below $30,000.

While 60% of married filers without dependents

show combined incomes of $30,000 or more, their numbers are small (i.e., 204 filers
with income of $30,000 or above).

Income of Adult Working Age Tax Filers With 0 Dependents in Zipcode 53206
(N=2,955 Single and Married Filers)
1000

952

.

900
800

691

Number of Filers

700
600
481

500
400

266

300
200
100

26

67

43

113 119

112
35

50

0
Under $10,000

$10,000-19,999

$20,000-29,999

Single Filers

$30,000-39,999

$40,000-49,999

$50,000 and
above

Married Filers

The graphs below show the changing trends for income of tax filers with dependents in
zipcode 53206 from 1993 to the 2005 tax year.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

34

Adjusted Gross Income Range of Single
Tax Filers with Dependents: 53206
6,000

Number of Income Tax Filers

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0
1993

1994

1995

$1-$4,999

1996

$5,000-$9,999

1997

1998

1999

$10,000-$14,999

2000

2001

$15,000-$24,999

2002

2003

2004

$25,000-$39,999

2005

$40,000+

Adjusted Gross Income Range of Married
Tax Filers with Dependents: 53206

Number of Income Tax Filers

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0
1993

1994
$1-$4,999

1995
$5,000-$9,999

1996

1997

$10,000-$14,999

1998

1999

$15,000-$24,999

2000

2001

$25,000-$39,999

2002

$40,000+

Note: Earnings categories are not adjusted for inflation. The cost of living increased by 30.3% from 1993 to 2005.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

35

Over Half of Working Families Have Incomes Below Poverty
Incomes Levels of Filers with Dependents 1994-2005
Federal poverty guidelines, adjusted gross income ranges for single and married tax filers
with dependents, and EIC credit claims were used to estimate the number of employed
families with AGI below the poverty level. The poverty guidelines provide the federal
government’s estimate of the income level families require to meet their basic needs and
are used to determine eligibility for federal support programs. In 2005, the federal
government set these guidelines at $12,830 for a two-person family, $16,060 for three
persons, and $3,260 for each additional person in the family. These standards were used
to determine the number of family tax filers showing income below the poverty line.
ƒ

For the 4,824 single parent families with dependents, in zipcode 53206 in tax year
2005 about 48% of single tax filers with one dependent showed adjusted gross
income (AGI) below the poverty level ($12,830 for two persons). Over half (58%) of
single filers with 2 dependents showed AGI below ($16,090 for three persons) and
63% (or more) of filers with three or more dependents had income below poverty.
Est. Employed Single Parent Families with 2005 Earnings Below Poverty
in Zipcode 53206 (N = 4,824 Tax Filers)

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%

63%

58%
48%

50%
40%
30%

41%

40%

20%

42%

10%

Before EIC Claims

0%
After EIC Claims

1
2
3 or more
Number of Dependents

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

36

ƒ

When the number of filers claiming the state and federal earned income credit (EIC)
was considered, the percentage of single parent families living in poverty was
reduced to about 41% of filers with one dependent and 42% (or more) of filers with
three or more dependents.

ƒ

State Department of Revenue data showed only 449 married tax filers with
dependents out of the 5,273 income tax filers with dependents in 2005. More
employed parents showed adjusted gross incomes above the poverty level.

ƒ

About 18% of married tax filers with one dependent showed adjusted gross income
below the poverty level. About 24% of married filers with two dependents reported
AGI below the poverty level, as did 37% (or more) of married filers with 3 or more
dependents.

ƒ

Federal and state EIC claims brought the poverty rates for married filers down to
15% for filers with one dependent and 15% for filers with two dependents.

ƒ

In zipcode 53206, married filers with three or more dependents showed at least a
fourth (29% or more) of families still living in poverty even with EIC claims.
Est. Employed Married Parent Families with 2005 Earnings Below Poverty
in Zipcode 53206 (N=449 Tax Filers)

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
37%

30%

24%

18%

20%
10%

15%

0%

29%
15%

Before EIC Claims
After EIC Claims

1
2
3 or more
Number of Dependents

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

37

ƒ

In total, the earned income tax credit (EIC) helped lift the income of about 718 single
parent families above the poverty level, leaving an estimated 1,967 single tax filers
with dependents (41% of the single parent total) still below the poverty level based
on their adjusted gross income and family size.

ƒ

For married filers, EIC claims helped raise about 30 families out of poverty leaving
91 married filers with dependents (20% of the married parent total) still in poverty.

Adjusted Gross Income of Families with Dependents in Zipcode 53206
6,000

.

5,000

Income Tax Filers

4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1994

2000

2002

2004

2005

1994

Single Parent Filers
Below poverty

2000

2002

2004

2005

Married Parent Filers
Above poverty with EIC

Above poverty

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

38

Earned Income Tax Credits for Families Bring In $14.8 Million
State Earned Income Tax Credits1993-2005
State and federal earned income tax credits offer a substantial boost to working families
at the lower end of the wage scale. The earned income tax credit (EIC) offers a tax
benefit to help reduce the payroll and social security tax burdens and to supplement
wages for low and moderate income working families and single persons. Wisconsin has
been a leader in providing a state credit in addition to the federal credit. For those
working family tax filers who claim the state credit, Wisconsin adds 4% to the federal
credit for families with one qualifying child, 14% to the federal credit for families with
two qualifying children, and 43% to the federal credit for families with three or more
qualifying children.

An analysis of earned income tax credits received by families in the 53206 zipcode
showed the importance of the credits to working families at lower income levels.
Wisconsin Department of Revenue data was analyzed for tax filers with dependent
children who received the Wisconsin earned income tax credit. Federal EIC payments
were estimated based on Wisconsin usage ratios.
ƒ

The number of families receiving earned income tax credits rose 17% from 3,907 in
1993 to 4,593 in the 2000 tax year.

ƒ

The number of families receiving the credit in 2005 (4,291 families) was down 6.5%
from the number filing claims for the 2000 tax year (4,593), but similar to the level in
2004 (4,289).

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

39

Families Claiming the Earned Income Tax Credits in Zipcode 53206

6,000
5,000

4,463

4,519

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

4,399

4,317

4,335

4,289

4,291

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

3,938

3,907
4,000

4,375

4,593

4,251
3,473

3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1993

1994

1995

Tax Year

ƒ

The amount of the combined federal and state earned income tax credits more than
doubled from $5.2 million in 1993 to $14.8 million in the 2005 tax year. The federal
and state credits to families in the 2005 tax year were at their highest level to date.

Est. Federal and State Earned Income Credit Dollars
Claimed by Families in Zipcode 53206
$16,000,000
$12,000,000
$8,000,000
$4,000,000
$0
1993

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Federal EIC

ƒ

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

State EIC

In 2005, single parents received 94% of the credits claimed in zipcode 53206. Single
parents comprised 91% of tax filers with dependents.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

40

Neighborhood Has Very High Claim Rates for the EIC
Estimated EIC Claim Rates 1993-2005
The Employment and Training Institute estimated claim rates for the EIC based on the
number of claims for filers with dependents and with adjusted gross income (AGI)
between $5,000 and $14,999. With a few exceptions, nearly all of these families may be
eligible for a total of $2,500 to $6,300 in federal and state earned income tax credits if
their dependents are living at home and are qualifying relatives.
ƒ

Single parent tax filers showed higher claim rates than married filers. For filers with
dependents, 94% of single filers with $5,000 to $14,999 in adjusted gross income –
the range with the highest potential EIC claims – claimed the credit in 2005, as did
81% of married filers in that income range.

Estimated Claim Rates

.

Families with $5,000-14,999 AGI Claiming EIC Credits
in ZIPCODE 53206

100%

92%

80%

89%

88%

91%

86%
77%

60%

93%

95%

82%

82%

1996

1997

91%

93%

76%

79%

1998

1999

93%

94%

93%

92%

94%

83%

84%

81%

82%

82%

81%

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

40%
20%
0%
1993

1994

1995

Married Filers

ƒ

93%

Single Filers

For the 2005 tax year, EIC claim rates were similarly high for filers in the $15,000 to
$24,999 income range – 93% for single parents and 79% for married parents.
Families in this income range are eligible for $1,000 to $6,095 in credits.

ƒ

Zipcode 53206 showed claim rates for the EIC that are among the highest in the
county.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

41

The formula for calculating the federal earned income tax credit in 2005 provided the
highest payments to families with 1 child when their income was $7,800 to $14,399
($16,399 for married filers) and to families with 2 or more children when their income
was $11,000 to $14,399 ($15,099 for married filers). Given that entry-level jobs in the
Milwaukee area since October 2003 have averaged over $8.00 an hour, this formula tends
to provide higher support for families in part-time or part-year work rather than full-time,
year-round employment.

For the 2005 tax year families with one qualifying dependent were eligible for the earned
income credit if their income was below $31,030 (for an unmarried filer) or $33,030 for
married filers in the 2005 tax year. Families with two or more qualifying dependents are
eligible for the credit if their income was below $35,263 for unmarried filers or $37,263
for married filers in 2005. Federal earned income credits, but not Wisconsin credits, are
also available for workers without dependent children if aged 25-64 and earning less than
$11,750 (if single) or $13,750 (if married) in 2005.

.

Federal and State Earned Income Tax Credits for Workers
Raising Qualifying Children: 2005 Tax Year

$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$37,000

$35,000

$33,000

$31,000

$29,000

$27,000

$25,000

$23,000

$21,000

$19,000

$17,000

$15,000

$13,000

$11,000

$9,000

$7,000

$5,000

$3,000

$0
$1,000

Total Federal and State Credits

$7,000

Adjusted Gross Income of Married Filers
1 qualifying child

2 children

3+ children

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

42

Families Are Still Borrowing Against Their EIC Tax Refunds
IRS Records of Refund Anticipation Loans 1999-2003
A recent phenomenon affecting tax credits for lower income workers and families has
been the promotion of “refund anticipation loans” (RALS). Under this promotion (which
is similar to “payday loans”), companies affiliated with paid tax preparers encourage tax
filers to take out a temporary loan against their anticipated income tax refund. According
to national research, the marketing of refund anticipation loans is aimed primarily at
lower income families eligible for the federal earned income tax credit and without
personal bank accounts in which to receive a direct deposit tax refund. Tax filers
obtaining RALs usually pay steep charges to receive their tax refunds a few days or
weeks early – with interest rates often as high as 250%.
ƒ

In zipcode 53206, in the 2003 tax year, 4,984 taxpayers claimed the federal earned
income tax credits (which are available to both families and individual low-income
workers). Of these, 2,583 filers (or 52%) borrowed on their tax refunds through
RALs prior to receiving them from the Internal Revenue Service, according to tables
posted by The Brookings Institution.

ƒ

The percentage of 53206 tax filers borrowing on their earned income tax credit
returns through RALs is down from highs of 64% in 2000 and 2001. The numbers of
families borrowing through RALs was down by 689 in 2003, compared to 1999.
Use of Refund Anticipation Loans by Federal EIC Claimants
in Zipcode 53206
80%

.

70%

61%

64%

64%

% Using RALs

60%
49%

50%

52%

40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

43

ƒ

Community education programs and increases in the numbers of filers in zipcode
53206 using free tax preparation services (supported by IRS, community
organizations and foundations) appear to be contributing to the decline in numbers of
tax filers borrowing against their tax refund through the RALs.

ƒ

The IRS data also showed a doubling of tax filers in 53206 who used volunteer tax
preparers (supported by IRS, community organizations and foundations) rather than
paid providers. For the 2003 tax year, 715 tax filers used free services, compared to
318 four years earlier, while the number of filers using paid services dropped by 526.

ƒ

Two-thirds (68%) of tax filers who used paid tax preparers borrowed against their
EIC tax refunds for the 2003 tax year, incurring losses of income in exchange for a
shorter turnaround time for receipt of their tax return. Even among this group using
paid tax preparers, however, the percentage borrowing through RALs has declined
from 85% reported four years earlier, according to the IRS data posted by The
Brookings Institution. Some of the decline, however, may be due to the introduction
of new for-fee services including prepaid credit cards.

Use of Refund Anticipation Loans by Federal EIC Claimants
Who Use Paid Tax Preparers: Zipcode 53206
100%

.

90%

85%

88%

83%

80%

% Using RALs

70%

66%

68%

2002

2003

60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1999

2000

2001

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

44

Has “Work Replaced Welfare”?
AFDC/W-2 Cases Vs. Single Parent Income Tax Filers 1994-2006
A main premise of Wisconsin’s welfare reform was that families previously receiving
AFDC income support would be directed to find employment and that their earnings
would provide greater economic security in the long-term.

To help gauge whether

employment has replaced welfare for single parents in the 53206 neighborhood and to
determine the effect of the economy on both employment and welfare receipt, the growth
in single tax filers with dependents was compared to changes in AFDC and “W-2”
welfare caseloads.
ƒ

The increase in single parent filers began prior to the imposition of state welfare
work requirements, as Milwaukee benefited from a thriving national and local
economy and increased demand for workers. Single parents continued to enter the
labor force when “Pay for Performance” and “W-2” welfare requirements were
implemented in the county.

Since 2000, however, the number of single parent

earners has been declining.
ƒ

Welfare records showed a decrease of 4,033 AFDC/”W-2” payment cases from 1994
to 2005, compared to only a 693 increase in single income tax filers with dependents.

Comparisons of Est. Single Parent Income Tax Filers and
AFDC/"W-2" Payment Cases in Zipcode 53206
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Single Filers with Dependents

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

AFDC/"W-2" Cases

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

45

ƒ

From July 2005 to July 2006 the W-2 payment cases dropped by another 104
families.

ƒ

As noted in prior indicators reports, some parents may have left the neighborhood,
not filed tax returns, or their children have grown up. Other families were employed
and receiving partial AFDC payments to supplement their family income. The data
suggest, however, that a number of families formerly on welfare have not moved into
the mainstream economy and other parents have subsistence total earnings.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

46

Only 642 Families Receive W-2 Cash Assistance
AFDC/W-2 Cash Payment Cases 1994-2006
Public assistance case records were analyzed for families receiving AFDC/”W-2” income
support, food stamps/FoodShare, and medical coverage.

The largest changes occurred

in the number of families receiving cash payments. Before “W-2” was implemented in
September 1997, families eligible for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
were paid cash grants based on their family size and income earnings. (In the 1990s a
mother with 1 child could receive up to $5,280 a year in AFDC cash payments, a 3person family up to $6,216, a mother and 4 children up to $8,508 a month.) Under W-2,
families (regardless of size) in Community Service Jobs receive $8,076 year, while
parents in W-2 Transition (i.e., deemed unable to hold employment due to disabilities or
other long-term barriers to employment) receive $7,536 for their family.
ƒ

In 1994, prior to state and federal welfare policy changes, the number of families
receiving AFDC cash payments, food stamp benefits, and medical assistance
insurance coverage were similar – from 4,600 to 4,900 cases a month. Now, the
number of families receiving W-2 cash payments is at 13% of the former levels, the
number of families in 53206 receiving food stamps/FoodShare and subsidized health
insurance coverage are much higher.

ƒ

The number of families in zipcode 53206 receiving income support (AFDC or
“Wisconsin Works,” i.e. “W-2,” cases) dropped 86%, from 4,779 in March 1994 to
663 in April 2000. Caseloads rose again to 1,347 “W-2” payment cases in July 2004
and then were reduced to 642 cases by July 2006.

ƒ

The number of families receiving income support (AFDC or “W-2”) in July
2006 was the lowest seen since the W-2 program began and 87% below the 1994
levels.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

47

Families Receiving AFDC or W-2 Income Support in Zipcode 53206
6,000
5,000

4,779
4,181
3,582

4,000

3,027
3,000
1,552

2,000

1,347

1,145
1,000

663

744

2000

2001

999

1,043
746

642

2005

2006

2005

2006

0
1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2002

2003

2004

See background notes for months used.

ƒ

Far more families seek out or receive medical assistance and FoodShare benefits than
W-2 income support, although the numbers are down in all 3 programs. When trends
in the numbers of families (with children) receiving income support are compared to
the number receiving medical assistance and food stamps/FoodShare, the July 2006
data show many more families in zipcode 53206 using medical insurance (4,080
families) and FoodShare (3,357 families) than receiving W-2 income support (642
families).
Families Receiving Food Stamps or Medical Insurance
Compared to AFDC/W-2 Income Support: Zipcode 53206
6,000
5,000
NA
4,000
NA
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1994

1995

1996

1997

Medical insurance

1998

1999

Food stamps

2000

2001
AFDC/W-2

2002

2003

2004

See background notes for months used.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

48

3,357 Families Receive FoodShare Benefits
Food Stamp/FoodShare Family Cases 1994-2006
Using the Wisconsin FoodShare program lower-income families and individuals can
apply for electronic debit cards to use to purchase food items. The program, financed by
the U.S. Department of Agriculture, previously issued food stamps to use for eligible
food purchases.
ƒ

The families with children in zipcode 53206 have showed sharp declines in the
numbers receiving food stamp/FoodShare benefits since the 1990s although these
declines were not nearly as steep as the AFDC/W-2 drops. The number of families
receiving benefits dropped from 4,612 in March 1994 to 2,934 in April 2000, or a
36% decline.

ƒ

The number of families enrolled in the food stamp/FoodShare program had increased
to 3,463 in 2002 and were at 3,357 in July 2006. Enrollments in 2006 were still 27%
below the 1994 levels.

Families Receiving Food Stamp/FoodShare Benefits in Zipcode 53206
5,000

4,612

.

4,216
3,794

4,000

Families with Children

3,446
3,135
3,000

2,942

2,934

2,957

1999

2000

2001

3,463

3,357

2002

2006

2,000

1,000

0
1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

See background notes for months used.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

49

4,080 Families Receive Subsidized Medical Assistance
Families with Medical Assistance Coverage 1994-2006
ƒ

The number of families (with children) in zipcode 53206 covered by medical
assistance, including Medicaid, BadgerCare and Healthy Start, dropped from 4,877 in
March 1994 to 3,843 in February 1999. Numbers increased between 1999 and 2002
to 4,412.

ƒ

The number of families covered by a medical assistance program dropped 7% from
2002 to 2006, when 4,080 families were enrolled.

Families Receiving Medical Insurance in Zipcode 53206
6,000
5,000

4,877

4,664

4,396

4,108

4,000

4,412
3,927

3,843

3,893

1998

1999

2000

4,081

4,080

3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1994

1995

1996

1997

2001

2002

2006

See background notes for months used.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

50

Child Care Subsidies Provide $1.2 Million Monthly for 1,056 Families
Child Care Subsidies 1993-2006
Subsidized child care payments were tracked for the Wisconsin Shares Program, which
offers federal and state child care support under TANF (the Temporary Assistance to
Needy Families) and CCDBG (Child Care Development Block Grant) monies. The
program subsidizes qualified day care for children and W-2 participants and for children
in “working poor” families. Families with income up to 185% of the poverty level are
eligible for Wisconsin Shares child care subsidies, and families may continue to receive
assistance until their income exceeds 200% of poverty.
The child care subsidy program offers a more generous financial benefit to working
families than the earned income tax credit although the number of families receiving
child care subsidies is considerably lower than the number claiming the EIC.

In

Milwaukee County, for the 2005 tax year a total of 59,532 families received state earned
income tax credit payments of $24,485,588 (for an average state EIC payment of $411
per family – and federal credits averaging over $2,000 per family). By contrast, about
13,000 Milwaukee County families received child care subsidies each month for subsidy
payments totaling $167,410,939 in 2005 (or over $12,000 per family).
ƒ

The number of families in zipcode 53206 receiving child care support more than
doubled from 429 in September 1997 to 1,080 in February 2004. In February 2006,
1,056 families received child care subsidies.
Families Receiving Child Care Subsidies: Zipcode 53206
1200

1,054

1,080

1,056
963

1000

889

800

650

600
429
400
200
0
Sept. 1997

Jan. 1999

March 2001

Feb. 2003

Feb. 2004

Feb. 2005

Feb. 2006

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

51

ƒ

Total four-week payments for families rose from $255,295 in September 1997 (or
$595 per family) to $1,140,677 in February 2003 (or $1,082 per family). In February
2006, four-week payments totaled $1,197,924 (or $1,134 per family).

Monthly Child Care Subsidy Payments to Families in Zipcode 53206
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
$0
Sept. 1997

ƒ

Jan. 1999

Mar. 2001

Feb. 2003

Feb. 2004

Feb. 2005

Feb. 2006

Average child care subsidy costs per family are up 12% over 2001 and nearly double
the subsidy per family in 1997. Subsidy cost increases reflect increases in the
allowable maximum rate charges as well as possible changes in the number of
children served in each family.

Average Monthly Child Care Subsidy Payments Per Family: Zipcode 53206
$1,500
$1,250
$1,011

$1,082

$1,034

$1,107

$1,134

Feb. 2005

Feb. 2006

$1,000
$807
$750

$595

$500
$250
$0
Sept. 1997

Jan. 1999

Mar. 2001

Feb. 2003

Feb. 2004

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

52

ƒ

Most of the children in the Wisconsin Shares subsidy program were in licensed group
care (49%) and licensed family care (38%). In this zipcode 10% of the subsidized
children were in family center certified by the county and 2% were in programs for
school age children operated by Milwaukee Public Schools and the Boys and Girls
Clubs.

Child Care Providers Used by Children With Shares
Subsidies in April 2006: Children Living in 53206
Boys and Girls
Club program
0.5%
MPS school age
program
1.6%

Licensed group
49.0%

Certified family
10.4%

Licensed family
38.4%

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

53

Child Care is a Growing Business in 53206
Licensed Child Care Capacity 1993-2006
Central city neighborhoods showed substantial increases in state-licensed child care
facilities since the state expanded its Wisconsin Shares Program, offering subsidized care
for children of “W-2” participants and “working poor” families. The state Department of
Health and Family Services licenses child care facilities. Capacity of licensed child care
was examined for family and group centers operating full-time, year-round.
ƒ

As of July 2006 there were 22 licensed group centers in zipcode 53206 with licensed
capacities ranging from slots for 15 to 175 children. In addition, 122 families were
licensed to care for up to 8 children in their homes.

ƒ

The capacity for children in full-time care with licensed providers more than tripled,
from 611 slots for full-time care in March 1996 to 2,072 slots in July 2006.

Licensed Child Care Capacity in Zipcode 53206
2,500
.

1,933

Full-Time Slots

2,000
1,347

1,500

1,486

1,476

July
2002

Oct
2003

2,072

1,572

970
1,000
611

623

Mar
1996

Aug
1997

755

500
0

ƒ

Jan
1998

Feb
1999

Aug
2001

Oct
2004

Aug
2005

July
2006

About half (53%) of the licensed slots were in group centers and 47% in family care.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

54

Licensed Child Care Capacity: Family vs. Group Providers
ZIPCODE 53206
1,600
.

1,400
1096

Full-Time Slots

1,200

973

1,000
732

800
600

515

527

400
200

96

96

796

857

839

839
960

619

136

238

551

629

637

976

733

0
Mar 1996 Aug 1997 Jan 1998 Feb 1999 Aug 2001 July 2002 Oct 2003
Family Providers

ƒ

Oct 2004 Aug 2005 July 2006

Group Centers

The zipcode has seen a dramatic rise in the number of family child care centers
licensed by the state to care for up to 8 children. The number of state licensed family
centers rose from 12 in 1996 to 122 in 2006. Additional numbers of families are
providing county certified child care through the state’s subsidized child care
program.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

55

Business Activity in 53206: Employees Down, Payrolls Up Slightly
ZIP Code Business Patterns 1993-2006
Sources of data used to measure business activity in zipcode 53206 include U.S. Census
Bureau data on business patterns (including number of number of employees, annual
payroll for private companies, and number of establishments) and City of Milwaukee
records on the value of taxable business property in the zipcode.

The U.S. Census Bureau ZIP Code Business Patterns reports the number of businesses,
payroll and number of full-time and part-time employees.
ƒ

The number of workers reported as employed in private businesses located in
zipcode 53206 increased from 1,313 in 1994 to 1,589 in 1999, and up to 1,644 in
2003.

ƒ

In 2004 the number of workers had dropped by 9% to 1,497.

Private Sector Employees Working in Zipcode 53206
(Full- and Part-Time Employees in Mid-March)
2,000

1,492
1,500

1,313

1,370

1,586

1,589

1998

1999

1,437

1,527

1,550

1,584

2000

2001

2002

1,644
1,497

1,000

500

0
1994

1995

1996

1997

2003

2004

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

56

The ZIP Code Business Patterns reports total annual payroll, including salaries, wages,
commissions, bonuses, sick-leave pay, in-kind payments for meals and lodging, and
reported tips. Total are before deductions for social security, taxes, union dues, etc.
ƒ

Annual payrolls for private establishments located in zipcode 53206 rose from $20.6
million in 1994 to $29.7 million in 2004.

ƒ

Payrolls increased by about 1% from 2003 to 2004.

ƒ

The annual payrolls increased by 7.8% from 2000 to 2004. When cost-of-living is
considered, the payroll increases were only 0.9%.

Annual Payroll of Businesses in Zipcode 53206
(in millions of dollars)
$29.8
$30

$27.6

$25

$22.9
$20.6

$21.3

1994

1995

$28.9

$28.3

2001

2002

$29.4

$29.7

2003

2004

$24.0
$21.7

$20
$15
$10
$5
$0
1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

57

The ZIP Code Business Patterns also report number of establishments by location.
Establishments are defined as single physical locations where business is conducted or
services or industrial operations are performed. Individual companies may have several
establishments in a community – each counted separately. Changes in the number of
establishments reflect gains or losses of businesses, and shifts from smaller to larger
businesses (or vice versa).
ƒ

In zipcode 53206 the number of establishments went from 210 in 1994 to 180 in
2000, but then rose to 218 in 2003 only to drop to 200 in 2004.

ƒ

Most of the decline in the number of businesses from 2003 to 2004 were in the
smallest establishments (with 1-4 employees).

ƒ

The net increase in businesses reported to the Census Bureau from 2000 to 2004
appears to be attributable to a rise in the number of child care centers located in the
zipcode.

ƒ

Reported businesses were down by 18 from 2003 to 2004.

Number of Business Establishments in Zipcode 53206
230
215

220

218

210
210
197

200

200

200
196

196
191

189
190
180
180
170
160
150
1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

58

50% Growth of Self-Employed Tax Filers in 3 Years
IRS Schedule C Filers 1998-2004
The U.S. Internal Revenue Service reports income tax statistics by zip code, including the
number of individual income tax filers who completed Schedule C Profit or Loss from
Business forms. These include self-employed individuals who are sole proprietors (who
own unincorporated businesses) or statutory employees. These residents offer another
source of business activity for the neighborhood, with many persons conducting selfemployed work as a side business.
ƒ

In zipcode 53206, 711 individuals filed Schedule C forms for 2004 tax year.

ƒ

The number of filers completing Schedule C rose 50% in the three-year period from
2001 to 2004.

Schedule C Self-Employed Business Filers in Zipcode 53206
800
711
700
600
473

500
410
400
300
200
100
0
1998

2001

2004

Tax Year

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

59

Residents Spend $83 Million Annually on Basic Consumer Needs
Purchasing Power Profiles 2000-2003
Economic assets of central city Milwaukee neighborhoods include their population
density, high concentrations of wage earners, and the purchasing power of residents.
Retail spending was estimated for neighborhood residents based on five types of
households at five income levels, using 2002-03 Consumer Expenditure Survey data on
spending patterns for each of these 25 household/income categories (as defined by the
2000 decennial census).
ƒ

Local residents spend over $83 million annually for 16 categories of consumer
expenditures. This translates into $31.2 million of spending per square mile, well
above the average spending in many affluent suburban and exurban neighborhoods.
Tapping into this purchasing power could improve the economic health of the
immediate neighborhood.
Purchasing Power Profile for Residents of the Milwaukee 53206 Neighborhood
Land Area in Square Miles: 3.26

Consumer Expenditure Category

Est. Annual
Expenditures

Food at home

$36,951,623

Food away from home

$10,426,438

$3,919,714

Apparel and related services

$10,966,440

$4,122,722

Television equipment, tapes, disks

$4,936,035

$1,855,652

Audio equipment, CDs, tapes

$1,190,362

$447,505

$615,952

$231,561

$2,738,776

$1,029,615

Household textiles
Furniture
Floor coverings
Major appliances
Small appliances and housewares

Expenditures Per
Square Mile
$13,891,588

$236,413

$88,877

$1,398,591

$525,786

$415,079

$156,045

Computer hardware and software

$1,232,698

$463,420

Miscellaneous household equipment

$1,878,110

$706,056

Non-prescription drugs and supplies

$2,392,644

$899,490

Housekeeping supplies

$4,303,942

$1,618,023

Personal products

$2,823,521

$1,061,474

$643,269

$241,830

$83,149,893

$31,259,358

Home repair commodities

Total for 16 categories

Source: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute, 2004. The analysis is based on 2002 Bureau of
Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Surveys and 2000 U.S. Census data. See www.eti.uwm.edu.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

60

2/3 of Residents’ Retail Spending Leaves the Neighborhood
Retail Sales Leakage/Surplus 2000-2003
To determine the extent to which existing retail businesses are capturing retail spending
of local residents, consumer expenditure estimates were reviewed for 15 categories of
consumer expenditures and compared to the retail sales estimated to result from numbers
of retail employees in the neighborhood. All of the expenditures in the ETI Purchasing
Power Profile shown above are included except for food-away-from-home (which is not
included in the North American Industry Classification System, NAICS, retail sector).
ƒ

Because of the absence of retail establishments within zipcode 53206, this zipcode
showed a very large retail sales leakage.

It is estimated that only a third of

residents’ retail expenditures (or $24.9 million in spending for the 15 categories) was
captured by local retail establishments, while the neighborhood is showing a net loss
of 66% of its retail expenditures.
ƒ

The neighborhood showed a retail sales leakage of $47,810,000. These are the
estimated dollars leaving the neighborhoods when residents buy their goods at
other locations.

Estimated Retail Sales Leakage for Zipcode 53206

Spending IN the
neighborhood
34%
Spending
LEAVING the
neighborhood
66%

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

61

Labor Market is Very Limited for Most 53206 Residents
2000 Census CTPP Files
As part of an innovative approach to central city economic development, the
Employment and Training Institute has used the Census Transportation Planning Package
databases (CTPP 2000) to examine not only where local residents work but also to profile
who comes into each neighborhood for jobs. This first-time analysis of employment by
jobsite uses place-of-work data (from household responses to the Census long-form
questionnaire provided to 1 in 6 U.S. households) released in 2004 and 2005. One job is
reported for each worker (the job where they worked the most hours). Since job totals
show only the primary job of each worker, they understate the total number of jobs in
area companies, particularly for employers with part-time work.

This approach,

however, allows a one-to-one match between available workers and primary jobs.
ƒ

The 2000 Census transportation files reported a total of 9,730 residents of zipcode
53206 (ages 16 and above) employed at the time of the 2000 Census.

ƒ

Most residents commute to jobs outside the zipcode. Only about 6% of residents
worked in the 53206 zipcode area, while 94% traveled to jobs outside the zipcode.
Where Residents of Zipcode 53206 Work

Waukesha,
Ozaukee,
Washington
counties
9%

Racine,
Kenosha,
Walworth
counties
1%

Same zipcode
6%

Milwaukee
County suburbs
20%

Rest of City of
Milwaukee
64%

The map below shows the jobsites where residents of zipcode 53206 were employed at
the time of the 2000 Census.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

62

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

63

ƒ

The labor market for most 53206 residents is limited to Milwaukee County. The
majority of residents (70%) worked in the City of Milwaukee and nearly all (90%)
work within Milwaukee County.

Another 9% of workers were employed in

Waukesha, Ozaukee and Washington (WOW) counties.
ƒ

Almost no residents (only 1%) have found work in Racine, Kenosha and Walworth
counties, the other counties of the “Milwaukee Region.”

ƒ

Leveraging greater employment for minority workers in Milwaukee County and
nearby jobsites in the WOW counties remains a top priority. Addressing driver’s
license problems is likely as critical priority.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

64

Driver’s License Suspensions Are Down from Previous 2 Years
State Driver’s License Status 1993-2005
State department of transportation files on licensed drivers, license suspensions, and
revocations were analyzed since greater employment opportunities are available to
workers with private transportation. The City of Milwaukee is responsible for most of
the driver’s license suspensions in Milwaukee County using suspension orders for failure
to pay fines not related to serious driving violations. The problem is particularly serious
for minorities and youth who are frequently stopped for minor vehicle infractions,
particularly in suburban communities, and then found to have a non-valid driver’s license
or vehicle license due to unpaid fines.

The large number of central city residents without a valid driver’s license remains an
ongoing impediment to employment. The 2000 Census showed only 6% of residents
working in the immediate neighborhood, while 94% commuted to jobs outside of the
53206 zipcode. The Employment and Training Institute’s annual job vacancy survey in
May 2006 found a job gap of 7 to 1, that is 7 job seekers for every 1 full-time job
available in Milwaukee’ central city. Three-fourths of all job vacancies were outside the
City of Milwaukee in the suburban and exurban areas not easily accessed by public
transportation.
ƒ

Failure to pay fines and civil forfeitures was the most common reason for driver’s
license suspensions. In 2005, suspension orders issued for failure to pay fines or
forfeitures totaled 6,308 for residents of zipcode 53206. The 6,308 “failure to pay”
suspension orders are down from an all-time high of 8,728 orders in 2003.

ƒ

The zipcode area showed more than 4 times as many suspensions for failure to pay
fines (6,308) as for suspension orders for traffic violations, driving while intoxicated,
and drug convictions combined (1,295).

ƒ

License revocations totaled 918 in 2005, down from over 2,000 annually in the mid1990s.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

65

Driver's License Suspensions and Revocations: Residents of 53206
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1992

1993

1994

1995

Revocations

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Suspensions-failure to pay fines

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Suspensions-other reasons

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

66

90% of Jobs in the Zipcode Are Held by Non-Residents
2000 Census CTPP Files
The Census 2000 files showed 6,174 persons (residents and non-residents) whose
primary job was located at a worksite in zipcode 53206. This included employment with
private companies, governmental and school units, non-profits, and self-employment.
The census job totals will differ from other sources, particularly for counts of part-time
workers. (See “Background Notes.”)
ƒ

Ninety percent of persons working at jobsites within zipcode 53206 came from
outside the neighborhood.

ƒ

Workers coming into the central city to work showed a much broader labor market
than outgoing central city workers. One fourth (24%) of the workers came from
outside Milwaukee County, mostly from the WOW (Waukesha, Ozaukee and
Washington) counties. The three southern counties (Racine, Kenosha and Walworth)
of the “Milwaukee Region” provided 2% of the workers coming into 53206 for jobs
– the same percentage as workers coming into the neighborhood from outside of the
Southeast Wisconsin area.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

67

Majority of Workers at 53206 Jobsites Are White,
Most Resident Workers Are African American
2000 Census CTPP Files
Given the sharp differences between the race of persons living in the zipcode and the race
of persons employed at companies and other jobsites in the zipcode, job gaps were
analyzed by race.

Race of Workers Who Live in Zipcode 53206
Asian
1%
Hispanic
1%

Other
1%

Race of Persons (Residents and Non-Residents)
Who Work in Zipcode 53206
Hispanic
3%

White
2%

Asian
1%

Other
1%

Black
39%

White
56%

Black
95%

ƒ

Whites comprise 2% of the resident workforce, but white workers hold 56% of jobs
with employers (public, private and non-profit) with jobsites in 53206. On the other
hand, African Americans make up 95% of the resident workforce in this zipcode, but
African American workers hold only 39% of jobs in zipcode 53206.

ƒ

African American workers held 39% of the jobs located in the 53206 neighborhood.
For private companies, they held 34% of jobs. For non-profits, they held 47% of the
jobs at neighborhood worksites.

ƒ

African Americans made up 65% of the 186 workers employed at state government
jobsites, 44% of the 100 workers employed at federal government jobsites, and 36%
of the 840 workers employed at local government jobsites (including schools) located
in zipcode 53206.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

68

Characteristics of Those Who Work at Jobsites in Zipcode 53206
(Includes Jobs Held by Residents and Non-Residents)
Total
Type of Employer
White
Black Hispanic
Asian
Other
Workers
Total workers
3,559
2,530
176
67
78
6,395
Private for-profit
60.6%
34.0%
2.6%
1.1%
1.1%
4,230
Private not-for-profit
45.6%
47.4%
2.5%
2.1%
0.0%
709
Local government
55.2%
36.3%
2.9%
0.0%
3.6%
840
State government
25.8%
65.1%
8.1%
0.0%
0.0%
186
Federal government
50.0%
44.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100
Self-employed not incorporated
29.8%
67.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
326
Unpaid family workers
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
18
Source: Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP2000) data on place-of-work based on responses to the 2000 Census long-form
questionnaire. Only 1 job is reported for each worker 16 and older and cell values are rounded. Totals may vary in place-of-work tables due to
rounding techniques used by the U.S. Census Bureau. See methodology for definitions of race/ethnicity. Drill Downs were prepared by the
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute, 2005.

ƒ

A majority (66%) of workers employed at 53206 jobsites worked for private
companies, with manufacturing firms as the leading industry type. Another 18%
worked for local, state, and federal governments and 11% worked for non-profit
agencies. A relatively small number of workers (5%) reported self-employment as
their primary job.

The tables below show the breakdown of jobs in zipcode 53206 by occupational
groupings of workers.
ƒ

Among the largest occupational areas, African Americans comprised over half (51%)
of the workers in office and administrative support, compared to about a fourth
(27%) of production workers at 53206 jobsites.

ƒ

The highest percentages of employment of African Americans at 53206 jobsites were
for personal care services (where African Americans made up 93% of all workers)
and food preparation and service (where they comprised 80% of the workers).

ƒ

African Americans made up nearly 40% of the workers in education, training and
library occupations, and 37% of jobs in management in the zipcode.

ƒ

White workers coming into the zipcode for work were most heavily concentrated in
production jobs.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

69

Current initiatives by the NAACP Milwaukee Branch and a coalition of other
organizations are focusing on access of minorities to jobs in construction.
ƒ

At the time of the Census, 164 persons were engaged in construction work (including
self-employment) at jobsites in zipcode 53206. White workers held 68% of these
jobs (or 111 jobs) and African Americans held 32% of the jobs (53 jobs).

ƒ

When the occupations of 53206 residents were analyzed (regardless of whether they
worked inside or outside of the neighborhood), 166 residents reported occupations in
construction.

Additional tables showing differences by transportation to work, type of industry,
salary/wages, gender, and age are available for each neighborhood at the Employment
and Training Institute’s interactive drilldown website (at www.eti.uwm.edu).

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

70

Occupations of People Who Work at Jobsites in Zipcode 53206
(Including Jobs Held by Residents and Non-Residents)
Total

White

Black

6,410

3,559

2,530

176

67

78

Total Occupation

1,566
805
678
445
409
331
280
228
224
197
191
164
158
143
138
127
81
59
44
32
10

1,056
454
294
259
230
124
132
151
220
14
28
111
135
43
92
29
48
43
40
18
10

417
313
347
163
171
179
134
73
0
183
153
53
23
90
32
88
33
12
0
14
0

69
28
10
15
4
14
4
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
10
0
4
0
0
0

10
0
19
4
0
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
4
0
0

14
10
8
4
4
14
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Production
Education, training, library
Office, administrative support
Management
Transportation, material moving
Sales, related
Community, social service
Installation, maintenance, repairs
Engineering, architecture
Personal care, service
Food preparation, serving related
Construction, excavation
Business, financial operations
Building + grounds cleaning/maintenance
Healthcare practitioners, technicians
Healthcare support
Arts, design, entertainment, sports, media
Protective service
Computer, mathematical
Life, physical, social science
Legal

Total
6,410
1,566
805
678
445
409
331
280
228
224
197
191
164
158
143
138
127

White
55.5%
67.4%
56.4%
43.4%
58.2%
56.2%
37.5%
47.1%
66.2%
98.2%
7.1%
14.7%
67.7%
85.4%
30.1%
66.7%
22.8%

Black
39.5%
26.6%
38.9%
51.2%
36.6%
41.8%
54.1%
47.9%
32.0%
0.0%
92.9%
80.1%
32.3%
14.6%
62.9%
23.2%
69.3%

Hispanic

Hispanic
2.7%
4.4%
3.5%
1.5%
3.4%
1.0%
4.2%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.9%

Asian

Asians
1.0%
0.6%
0.0%
2.8%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.1%
0.0%

Other Occupational Grouping

Other
1.2%
0.9%
1.2%
1.2%
0.9%
1.0%
4.2%
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Groupings with Over 100 Employed
Total Occupation
Production
Education, training, library
Office, administrative support
Management
Transportation, material moving
Sales, related
Community, social service
Installation, maintenance, repairs
Engineering, architecture
Personal care, service
Food preparation, serving related
Construction, excavation
Business, financial operations
Building + grounds cleaning/maintenance
Healthcare practitioners, technicians
Healthcare support

Source: Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP2000) data on place-of-work based on responses to the 2000 Census long-form
questionnaire. Only 1 job is reported for each worker and cell values are rounded. See methodology for definitions of race/ethnicity and
occupations. Drill Downs were prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute, 2005.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

71

Background Notes
The neighborhood indicators track changes by neighborhood since 1993, prior to beginning of state and federal
welfare reform. Community agencies assisted in identifying key areas of concern. City, county and state agencies
cooperate in securing databases needed for the analysis. This report assesses employment, economic and welfare
changes in ZIP code 53206 based on fourteen years of institutional data. Data was collected on income supports
given to families in 2006 (including W-2 cash payments, food stamps/FoodShare benefits, medical assistance, and
subsidized child care). The 2005 income tax analyses (based on state tax returns filed in 2006) provide income data
that is six years more current than the 1999 incomes reported by the 2000 Census. Recently released Census 2000
transportation planning databases are used to provide a first-time analysis by race of jobs located within each central
city neighborhood. State-of-the-art purchasing power and retail sales leakage analyses developed by the
Employment and Training Institute help communities and neighborhood-based businesses assess the spending
power assets of each central city zipcode. Other institutional data includes property tax records, state child care
licensing reports, state correctional records, published Internal Revenue tables, and housing data released by the
U.S. Department of Housing and Federal Reserve Board.
The aerial map on the cover is from the 2000 Digital Orthophotography, originally prepared for the Southeastern
Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission.
“Adjusted gross income” includes income from wages, salaries, tips, taxable interest, dividends, alimony, business
income, capital gains income, rental income, etc. and excludes certain business losses, capital gains losses, alimony
payments, etc. See state and federal tax forms for definitions of adjustments made to calculate Adjusted Gross
Income. Income tax data have several advantages as neighborhood indicators: they are available annually and they
provide more comprehensive listings of income than may be volunteered for the U.S. Census long form or survey
research projects. They miss, however, income of persons not filing taxes, “earnings” from the underground
economy, and the cash value of food stamps, medical assistance, and child care subsidies. Also, they are subject to
the vagaries of the income tax code and may understate income for persons with rental properties, self-employment
expenses, tax-deferred annuities, etc.
The income tax returns analyzed in this report are for working age tax filers, excluding dependents (teenagers,
students and others) claimed on another adult’s tax return and senior citizens claiming the elderly credit or elderly
exemption. In tax year 2000, the elderly credit was replaced by an elderly exemption. Because filers can now be
more effectively identified as elderly, the year 2000 through year 2005 working age files include a slightly different,
and smaller, population than the files for previous years. Consequently, calculations of working age tax filers and
total AGI for the 1993 to 1999 period may differ from those in 2000-2005 due to the elderly credit/exemption
changes.
The earned income tax credit offers a tax benefit to help reduce the tax burden and to supplement wages for low
and moderate income working families and single persons. For family tax filers who claim the credit, Wisconsin
adds 4 percent to the federal credit for families with one qualifying child, adds 14 percent to the federal credit for
families with two qualifying children, and adds 43 percent to the federal credit for families with three or more
qualifying children. Together the federal and state credits could total from $3 to $6,300 for the 2005 tax year. Total
federal credit payments are estimated based on state tax return data.
The poverty estimates understate poverty for larger families with more than three dependents and for families who
are contributing to the support of other family members, and they do not include federal food stamps and child care
subsidy benefits, SSI payments, child support, other financial contributions to the care of family and non-reported
income sources.
The number of federal tax filers using Refund Anticipation Loans (RALs) is from the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service as posted on The Brookings Institution (www.brookingsg.edu/es/urban/eitc/dataguide.htm) “Tax Return
Information Website.” This information is for all tax filers receiving the earned income tax credit, including
individuals not eligible for the Wisconsin EIC.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

72

“W-2” cases for the zipcode do not include families receiving public assistance support under the “Kinship Care”
program for relatives caring for minor children or the “Caretaker Supplement” program for eligible parents receiving
Supplemental Security Income (SSI). AFDC/W-2 caseloads are reported for the following months: March 1994,
December 1995, September 1996, June 1997, April 1998, February 1999, April 2000, June 2001, July 2002, July
2002, July 2003, July 2004, July 2005, and July 2006.
Data on adults incarcerated in Wisconsin Department of Corrections facilities is based on the June 30, 2006
State of Wisconsin public inmate data file prepared biannually and containing detailed information on each
incarceration and release of adult inmates since 1993. The database includes individuals in the Wisconsin
Department of Corrections system but does not include inmates in the House of Corrections and jails. The data
entries for admission and release from DOC facilities are for any reason, including for formal alternatives to
revocation or for temporary probation and parole holds. See www.eti.uwm.edu for the full report on “Barriers to
Employment: Prison Time.”
HMDA (Home Mortgage Disclosure Act) data is collected federally from lending institutions in metropolitan
areas on loans for home purchases, refinancing and home repairs. (Home equity loans taken out for consolidation of
credit card debt are not reported in this database unless some part of the loan proceeds is intended for home
improvements or home purchase.) See www.ffiec.gov/hmda for definitions of loans included in the database and
www.huduser.org/datasets/manu.html for the methodology used by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development to define subprime lenders.
The U.S. Census 2000 Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP 2000) data used four racial categories
in reporting its data tables: white alone, black or African American alone, Asian alone, and all other (including
persons reported as 2 or more races, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, or
other race). Workers were also identified as (1) Hispanic or Latino, and (2) not Hispanic or Latino. For this report,
all workers identified as “Hispanic or Latino” are included in that category. The four categories of race listed above
were used for persons who were not identified as Hispanic or Latino.
The estimates of workers in the CTPP 2000 tabulations have been rounded by the Census Bureau for each
reported cell. Values from 1 through 7 were rounded to 4. Values of 8 or greater were rounded to the nearest
multiple of 5, unless the estimate already ended in 5 or 0, in which case it was not changed. As a result, estimates
derived from these files may not be identical to comparable figures contained in other census products. The greater
the number of records from these files that are summed for comparison purposes, the more rounding errors there
may be and the greater the difference between the estimates from different sources may be.
Counts of workers at-work obtained from CTPP 2000 will differ from other employment data sources. The number
of workers shown in CTPP Part 2 will be approximately 91 to 93 percent of the number of jobs counted by
establishment inventories. There are several reasons for differences between worker counts and total jobs. Census
2000 counts employed persons not individual jobs. For persons with more than one job, characteristics on only the
principal job are collected. Nationally, about 6 percent of workers have second jobs. CTPP 2000 reports only those
workers who were at work during the reference week (typically the week before the U.S. Census is conducted).
Individual responses may vary as to the location of worksites (e.g., a street address vs. intersection bordering several
census tracts, the company headquarters vs. a specific worksite). For more detail on methodology and definitions,
see the UWM Employment and Training Institute website (www.eti.uwm.edu), the U.S. Census Bureau website
(www.census.gov), and the U.S. Department of Transportation Census Transportation Planning Package 2000
website (www.fhwa.dot.gov/ctpp).
The cost of living is measured by the Consumer Price Index for the Milwaukee-Racine area. The cost of living
increased 33.1% from 1993 to 2006 and by 3.3% from 2005 to 2006.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

73

Milwaukee Central City ZIP Codes

For more information, contact Lois Quinn, Senior Scientist, Employment and Training Institute, School of
Continuing Education, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 161 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 6000, Milwaukee,
WI 53203. Phone: 414-227-3380. Email: eti@uwm.edu. Website: www.uwm.edu/Dept/ETI.

Milwaukee Neighborhood Indicators, prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment and Training Institute

74