Fbop Ser Quarterly Reports 1998jan-sep
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
UNITED STATES GOVERm1ENT memorandum DATE: April 21, 1998 REPLY TO ATIN OF: Sherree L. Sturgis, Regional Counsel Bureau of Prisons, Southeast Region 523 McDonough Blvd., S.E. Atlanta, GA 30315 SUBJECT: Second Quarter Report FY 98 Uanuarv·1, 1998 through March 31,1998) TO: W~llace Cheney, General Counsel Bureau of Prisons, Central Office 320 First Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20534 ATTN: Nancy P. Redding, Executive Assistant The following information is provided for the second quarter (Jan, Feb, Mar) FY 1998. (O" Litigation NUMBER OF ACTIONS FILED HABEAS CORPUS ACTIONS FTCA ACTIONS BIVENS ACTIONS OTHER (Mandamus, etc) . NUMBER OF LITIGATION REPORTS NUMBER PENDING NUMBER CLOSED . NUMBER OF HEARlNGSITRIALS NUMBER OF SETTLEMENTS AMOUNT OF AWARD NUMBER OF CRIMINAL REFERRALS 36 20 2 12 2 14 94 $ 2570 (. SER Quarterly Report April 21, 1998 Page 2 Significant Case Activity Civil Matters 1. FRESON v. U.S. & ANTHONY RICHARDSON, 97-1373-CIV-GRAHAM - Southern District of Florida A deposition of the plaintiffwas taken on February 5, 1998. In this FTCAIBivens case the plaintiff, a private mail courier by the name ofRiclJ,ard Freson, was being escorted off institution grounds. as he was being verbally abusive of staff and was generally disruptive in FCI, Miami's front lobby. Lt. Anthony Richardson, Bivens defendant, was the escorting staff member. While escorting Freson verbal insults were exchanged between the two men. This situation was escalated when Freson, by several staff witnesses accounts, attempted to punch Lt. Richardson. Lt Richardson evaded the punches of Freson and returned one punch to Freson's face. Freson fell striking the U. S. Flag pole. Freson's injuries included a contusion and laceration in the middle of his forehead. Freson claims 1st, 4th and 5th Amendment violations, as well as common law torts. 2. PORTO v. UNITED STATES, 96-8337-CIV-HVRLEY - So.uthern District of Florida On February 23 through February 26, 1998, the depositions of three (3) Doctors and the Plaintiff were taken. In this FTC A case the plaintiff alleges negligent diagnosis and treatment of a toe lesion, while he was incarcerated at FCI, Jesup, resulting in the amputation of his leg (below the knee). 3. Johnson v. Moore Case No. CV297-33 (S.D. Ga.) This case was tried on April 9, 1998. This was Bivens case where the plaintiff alleges that a Correctional Officer forced him to clean a bathroom which was beyond his capabilities and in violation of his medical restriction. This was a bench trial. The judge returned a vcrdict for the defendant. Patty DeJuneas traveled to Brunswick, Georgia, to provide trial assistance. 4. 1 Gelis v. Wooten. et al. Case No. CV297-23 (S.D. Ga.) This case had been set for trial April 20, 1998. This is a Bivens case wherc the plaintiff alleges there was a conspiracy to deny him hip replacement surgery and rehabilitative physical therapy. The District Court has taken this case offthe docket pending resolution of the interlocutory appeal on qualified immunity. ( 2571 C- SER Quarterly Report April 21, 1998 Page 3 5. Sulayman v.Reno Case No. CV297-118 (S.D.Ga.) This is the Jesup EEO case filed by a doctor claiming he was discriminated against because he had befriended a contract worker who had filed an EEO sexual harassment claim. This doctor had been removed as Chief Medical Officer and later transferred to Talladega as a result of a focus review. He appears to be claiming this was a pretext for the discriminatory motive. This case is a problem because two correctional health care administrators at Jesup had participated in sexually harassing actions with other (not Dr .. Sulayman) health service staff. Sulayman seeks to make his own case by bringing out the facts of these other situations and Judge Alaimo has allowed in spite of our objections. Unfortunately, Judge Alaimo has extended discovery for the plaintiff for the third time. We believe he will want to depose Dr. Moritsugu and Regional Direct?r Matthews, among others. 6. c. Byrd v. Hasty Case Numbers: 3:96-CV-289-LAC/SMN (Northern District of Florida); 97-2129 (Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals) This case is a habeas corpus action in which the inmate challenges the refusal of the Bureau to allow him to participate in the DAP because his current offense was found to be a crime of violence by reason of a two-point enhancement at sentencing for possession of a firearm .. Oral argument in the Eleventh Circuit was scheduled for 4-16. Sherree and Van went to obseve the argument. All were surprised when the inmate's counsel failed to appear. The court will decide the case based on briefs. The inmate's counsel has written a letter indicating he had miscalendared the date of the oral argument and profusely apologizing to the court and all who were inconvenienced. Wirth v. Federal bureau of Prisons. et al. Case Number 98-A-2008-N (Middle District of Alabama) This is a Bivens case with 22 named individual defendants. The defendants inch.lde several high-ranking employees who are in different locations. At least three of the defendants have retired. In the lengthy complaint, the Plaintiff alleges, among other things, a conspiracy to retaliate for exercise of First Amendment Rights, a deprivation of due process in an inmate discipline hearing, denial of a year off under 18 U.S.C. 3621, submission of false information to the court, transfer to impede his access to counsel and improper assignment of a management variable. He seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive money damages. 7. ( 2572 ( SER Quarterly Report . April 21, 1998 Page 4 Criminal Referrals DEFENDANT(S): SCHREIBER, Harry, Reg. No. 40454-004 Institution: FCC Coleman -Low Date of Offense: Various type of Case: Potential Criminal Prosecution Description: A review of telephone monitoring tapes has indicated that inmate Schreiber may be participating in the management of a Health Maintenance Organization through which he may be attempting to commit fraud. Inmate's Schreiber's current offense involves bankruptcy fraud, wire fraud, and concealment of assets, and a specific condition of his Judgment and Commitment Order directs that he is not to become involved in management of an HMO. Status of Referral: Referred to local FBI on 01/13/98. Local FBI have referred further investigation to the FBI in C.D. Ca., and the U.S. Attorney's Office in W.D. Tex., which originally investigated and prosecuted inmate Schreiber's current offense. C" " DEFENDANT: William Raymond Hock Institution: FCI, Tallahassee Case Name: U.S.A. vs. William Raymond Hock, Case No. 4:97cr75-RH Description: Sexual abuse of inmate by staff member. Trial begins on Monday, March 16 in Tallahassee. The officer is charged with violating 18 U.S.C. §2243(b). While the Office of Inspector General is handling the lead on the case, Warden Greer has indicated he wants Dan Rouse to attend to assist with the interests of the institution. Thirteen (13) staff members have been subpoenaed by the defense. ,Federal Tort Claims ActlEmployee Claims NUMBER FILED PERSONAL PROPERTY PERSONAL INJURY MEDICAL WRONGFUL DEATH PERSONAL INJURY AND PERSONAL PRO PERT NUMBER PAID AMOUNT PAID NUMBER DENIED NUMBER PENDING NUMBER OVERDUE AVERAGE PROCESSING TIME 149 116 036 o o 2 019 $7029 75 103 o 36 2573 SER Quarterly Report Apri121, 1998 Page 5 ( FOIIPA NUMBER RECEIVED NUMBER CLOSED NUMBER PENDING TOTAL NUMBER OVERDUE NUMBER OVERDUE 30 DAYS NUMBER OF CIVIL ACTIONS 51 44 30 04 04 0 Quarterly Comparison TORT CLAIMSIEMPLOYEE CLAIMS .'. ( '~" -' SER NUM PROP PI APPR AMT DEN PEND OD AlO AlP 1ST OTR 128 104 24 15 1703 58 120 3 98 27 2NDOTR 149 116 30 19 7029 75 103 0 00 36 3RD OTR 4TH OTR LITIGATION NU BIV OTH ANS PEN CLD wr SET AWD 5 13 5 46 ? ? ? ? ') 2 12 2 14 M H C C 1ST QTR 54 31 2ND QTR 36 20 SER IT 3RD QTR 4TH QTR i \ 2574 94 SER Quarterly Report April 21, 1998 Page 6 FOIlPA SER NUM PROC PEND OD AlOD AlP CA 1ST QTR 66 110 22 3 1 27 0 2ND QTR 51 044 30 4 1 23 0 3RD QTR 4TH QTR Other Activities Miscellaneous Activities c TravellLeave: Sherree L. Sturgis 2-10-98 Spoke at Joint CLE conference for all US attorneys's offices in GA. 2-26-98, 3-26 Depositions in Sulayman EEO case (Brunswick) , 4-14-1998 (meeting with City of Tallahassee officials about road realignment issues 4-26 to 30, 1998 MSTC (Sentencing Training) , Van Vandivier 5-11 to 5-20 DHO Training MSTC Earl Cotton 2-23 to 2-26 Depositions, Porto v. US, Ft. Lauderdale Military Leave 4-27 to 5-18 Patty DeJuneas' 4-8 &. 9 Gere Gooden I 1-20t022 Johnson v. Moore (Brunswick) FOI Course Personnel Moves Beverly Snell, legal intern, reported for duty on March 2, t'998. Trevius Wilson, office assistant, reported for duty March 1, 1998. ( cc: Regional 'Director '" 2575 ~TEDSTATESGOVERNMENT memorandum ( DATE: REPLY TO ATfN OF: SUBJECT: TO: July 20, 1998 Sherree L. Sturgis, Regional Counsel Bureau of Prisons, Southeast Region 523 McDonough Blvd., S.E. Atlanta, GA 30315 Third Quarter Report FY 98 Wallace Cheney, General Counsel Bureau of Prisons, Central Office 320 First Street, N;W. Washington, D.C. 20534 ATTN: Amy Whalen Risley, Executive Assistant The following infonnation is provided for the second quarter (Apr, May, Jun) FY 1998. Litigation NUMBER OF ACTIONS FILED HABEAS CORPUS ACTIONS FTCA ACTIONS BIVENS ACTIONS OTHER (Mandamus. etc) NUMBER OF LITIGATION REPORTS NUMBER PENDING NUMBER CLOSED NUMBER OF HEARINGSITRIALS NUMBER OF SETTLEMENTS AMOUNT OF AWARD NUMBER OF CRIMINAL REFERRALS 40 22 4 12 2 10 542 23 $ (' \ 2576 ( SER Quarterly Report July 20, 1998 Page 2 Significant Case Activity Civil Matters 1. Johnson v. Moore Case No. CV297-33 (S.D. Ga.) This case was tried on April 9, 1998. This was Bivens case where the plaintiff alleges that a Correctional Officer forced him to clean a bathroom which was beyond his capabilities and in violation of his medical restriction. This was a bench trial. The judge returned a verdict for the defendant. Patty DeJuneas traveled to Brunswick, Georgia, to provide trial assistance. 3. ( \. Byrd y. Hasty Case Numbers: 3:96-CV-289-LAC/SMN (Northern District of Florida); 97-2129 (Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals) This case is a habeas corpus action in which the inmate challenges the refusal of the Bureau to allow him to participate in the DAP because his current offense was found to be a crime of violence by reason of a two-point enhancement at sentencing for possession of a firearm. Oral argument in the Eleventh Circuit was scheduled for 4-16. Sherree and Van went to observe the argument. All were surprised when the inmate's counsel failed to appear. The court will decide the case based on briefs. The inmate's counsel has written a letter indicating he had miscalendared the date of the oral argument and profusely apologizing to the court and all who were inconvenienced. 4. Wirth v. Federal Bureau of Prisons. et al. Case Number 98-A-2008-N (M.D. Ala.) This is a Bivens case with 22 named individual defendants. The defendants include several highranking employees who are in different locations. At least three of the defendants have retired. In the lengthy complaint, the Plaintiff alleges, among other things, a conspiracy to retaliate for exercise of First Amendment Rights, a deprivation of due process in an inmate discipline hearing, denial of a year ofT under 18 U.S.c. 3621, submission offalse information to the court, transfer to impede his access to counsel and improper assignment of a management variable. He seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive money damages. This is also the case where TOG Attorney Craig Simmons is accused of falsifying documents because of an error he made in a declaration in a previous case. (' 2577 SER Quarterly Report . July 20, 1998 Page 3 ( 5. Alexander v. Hawk. et al. Case Number 96-276-CIV-OC-IO (M.D.Fla.) Appeal Number 96-3752 (11 th Circuit) This case began as a challenge to the implementation of the Ensign Amendment. The District Court dismissed the case, sua sponte and before service of process, on the ground that the PLRA requires exhaustion of adm,inistrative remedies. The inmate appealed. The Eleventh Circuit appointed counsel. Both counsel and the inmate requested that counsel be allowed to withdraw. This was denied. The DO] Appellate Section has taken an interest in this case. Peter Maier is handling it. Consolidation with Michael Henry Smith v. BOP, App. No. 97-6663, was requested but this was denied. The SG has approved participation by the U.S. as amicus, and a motion requesting to file an amicus brief has been submitted to the 11 th Circuit. 6. Kiserv. Hawk, No. 97-195-Civ-Oc-l0B, FFLM In this case, COL inmate Stanley Kiser (1 6395-004)challenged the BOP's decision to deny him eligibility for a reduction in sentence for successful completion of the residential DAP program. We had denied his eligibility after he completed the institution portion ofthe program at TAL. The basis for our denial was that he is an old law inmate to whom the DAP early release provisions do not apply. The court ruled in our favor on 4-30-98. ..' ( 7. U.S. Ex reI. Jeffery Slavkovsky v. Susan Kirk and William Buchannann Case No. CV298-] 00 (S.D. Ga.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) This is new case, a Oui Tam civil complaint filed under the False Claims Act by a former PHS dentist who was assigned at FCI Jesup. He alleges that a contract Pharmacy Assistant fraudulently billed the institution for services she had not rendered with the full knowledge and cooperation ofthe Health Systems Administrator. The U.S. Attorney's Office has requested that we advise them of BOP's perspectives regarding whether there is merit to the relator's allegations and whether the United States should, therefore, intervene and pursue the action. 8. Figueroa v. Franco. et al. Case No. 95-1791 (D. Puerto Rico) We are very pleased to advise that the district court has vacated its previous judgment for $1.00 against the individual defendants and dismissed this case with prejudice. This is the Bivens action from Puerto Rico where the court had found that two defendants violated the right of the inmate to receive a copy of the DHO report in a timely manner, and awarded $1.00 damages against the defendants on summary judgment. Pursuant to a Rule 60(b)(6) motion, the court reconsidered and vacated its previous order. 9. ( United States v. Jaime Rosado Rosario Crim. No. 97-049 (JAF), D.P.R. On April 24, 1998, the Honorable Jose A. Fuste convened a meeting among defense counsels (approximately 7), AUSAs and GUA Attorney Alma Lopez to discuss the need for additional records in the above referenced case. Defense counsel as well as the AUSA had made voluminous requests for records (entries of visits in Legal and Social Visitors logbooks) dating 2578 SER Quarterly Report (" July 20, 1998 Page 4 back to 1996 through the present. There were some discrepancies in the records submitted pursuant to the Government's requests and the defense counsels. All information responsive to the requests had been provided, but some pieces of data addressed more than one request. Cross referencing was not always included. MDC was constrained from discussing defense counsel's request with AUSAs because the Court had specifically instructed MDC that this information was not to be discussed with US Attorney's Office. Judge Fuste ordered production of unredacted copies of the logbooks. It was explained to the judge that this production would compromise the privacy rights of the other inmates whose names appeared in the pages that would satisfy the request. The judge indicated that in order to safeguard those inmates' privacy rights, only two copies of the records would be made (one of AUSAs and the other for the defense counsels). These records could not be reproduced by counsel and upon completion of the trial, these copies as well as the copies given to the jury would be returned to the court for their destruction. 11. C" . ~, ... Sulayman v. Reno Case No. CV297-118 (S.D. Ga.} This is the Jesup EEO case filed by a doctor claiming he was discriminated against because he had befriended a contract worker who had filed an EEO sexual harassment claim. This doctor" had been removed as Chief Medical Officer and later transferred to Talladega as a result of a focus review. He appears to be claiming this was a pretext for the discriminatory motive. This case is a problem because two correctional health care administrators at Jesup had participated in sexually harassing actions with other (not Dr. Sulayman) health service staff. Sulayman seeks to make his own case by bringing out the " facts of these other situations and Judge Alaimo has allowed in spite of our objections. Unfortunately, Judge Alaimo has extended discovery for the plaintiff for the third time. Do RELIGIOUS CASES: No new cases. Eo ENSIGN AMENDMENT CASES: No new cases. Fo PLRA 1915 DISMISSALs: None Go CRIMINAL CASES: 1. U.S.A. "s. William Raymond Hock, 4:97cr75-RH, {N.D. Fla.} This officer is charged with violating 18 USC §2243(b}, sexual abuse of an inmate, While the Office oflnspector General is handling the lead on the case .. Thirteen (13) staff members ha\'c been subpoenaed by the defense. Trial began on June 1 was recessed on June 4 to June 16. The recess was necessary as Hock's attorney attempted to introduce physical evidence of which the governmcnt had no prior knowledge, specifically. photographs of the defendant's penis which showed an alleged birthmark " which, according to his girlfriend's testimony, is very obvious. The inference to the jury is that the inmates should have noticed this if the sexual acts occurred as alleged. Hock is scheduled to be examined by a skin doctor to det~rmine if the "mark" is real, how lqng is may have been there, is it ob\ious. etc. I 2579 ( SER Quarterly Report July 20, 1998 Page 5 \ 2. DEFENDANTS(S): Anthony Battle #11451-056 Institution Tracking No.: ATL-94-4170 Name of Case: U.S. v. Battle Court: FGAN Docket No.: 1:95-CR-528 Institution: A TL Date of Offense: 12/21194 Type of Case: Criminal Prosecution Description: Inmate convicted of homicide Officer D'Antonio Washington. "" Special Monitoring: Assigned to special monitoring Status of Referral: Accepted. Update: Convicted and sentenced to death, 1997. Appellate briefs filed by both prosecution and defense. Housed in Alabama DOC facility. DOC would like for us to move him. Seeking to work out problems with DOC and exploring other possible state placements. Assigned to: AUSA Bill McKinnon, Jan Jenkins FBI: Tyrone Smith 3. c·. United States v. Jaime Rosado Rosario. Cr. No.: 97-049, D.P.R. Institution: MDC Guaynabo Date of Offense: November 22, 1996 Type of Case: Criminal Prosecution Trial commenced on March 31, 1998. Defendants in this case are charged with arranging and carrying out the murder of a federal witness from within the MOC. Although requested by the prosecution, this case was not certified to carry the death penalty. Defense counsel and AUSAs have subpoenaed several staff members (i.e. Health Services Administrator and his Assistant, SIA) to testify about the possible ways in which different inmates could meet in the Health Services Unit or other places and how the inmates could communicate with one another even ifnot in the same unit. This issue is very relevant to the trial because some government witnesses were testifying to the fact that they had overheard conversations among the defendants in the HSU and other places of the institution. Judge Fuste had previously issued an order for all defense counsel to inspect and tour different areas of the institution in which the meetings among the defendants allegedly took place. Other staff mcmbers were also subpoenaed (i.e. ISM, Recreation Specialist) to authenticate records of movement of inmates to court and to testify about the delivery of newspapers to the Unit. The delivery of newspapers was important because defendants knew details of the murder that were only published in one nc\"'"spaper that takes from two to three days to arrive at the institution because the inmates have individual subscriptions to it and they are delivered by regular mail. The prosecution rested. Trial is expected to end Ma~ 4 or 5. AUSA: John Teakell and Mike Fernandez 4. FCI, Edgefield has started its Legal Services life early and with a bang by having a \\all-. away from the work cadre. ( 5. FCI, Yazoo has referred two relatively minor drug possession cases for prosecution on the th'-'Of) . that we should begin with a strong statement. Both were accepted. A good start. 2580 Coo SER Quarterly Report July 20, 1998 Page 6 6. DEFENDANTS(S): David Shane Shelby #05374-081 Institution Tracking No.: ATL-7143 Name of Case: US v. David Shane Shelby Court: NDGA Docket No.: 1:98-CR-0020 Institution: A TL Date of Offense: 7/23/97 Type of Case: Criminal Prosecution Description: Inmate Shelby held Ms. D. Ross at knife point in the food service department. Special Monitoring: Not assigned to special monitoring Status of Referral: Accepted Update: Inmate Shelby is scheduled to enter a guilty plea to Assault on a Correctional Officer on 7/20/98. Assigned to: AUSA: Jan Jenki~s FBI: Daron Cheney Federal Tort Claims ActlEmployee Claims (.... -. 136 NUMBER FILED PERSONAL PROPERTY PERSONAL INJURY MEDICAL WRONGFUL DEATH PERSONAL INJURY AND PERSONAL PROPERTY NUMBER PAID AMOUNT PAID NUMBER DENIED NUMBER PENDING NUMBER OVERDUE AVERAGE PROCESSING TIME 109 27 o o o 11 $1,724 73 100 2 19 FOIlPA NUMBER RECEIVED Nill\1BER CLOSED NUMBER PENDING TOTAL NUMBER OVERDUE NUMBER OVERDUE 30 DAYS NUMBER OF CIVIL ACTIONS 58 81 31 20 2 o (, 2581 (_. SER Quarterly Report July 20, 1998 Page 7 ". Ouarterly Comparison TORT CLAIMSIEMPLOYEE CLAIMS SER NUM. PROP PI APPR AMT DEN 1ST OTR 128 104 24 15 1703 58 2ND OTR 149 116 30 19 7029 IRD OTR 136 109 27 11 1724 4TH OTR ( 2582 PEND OD AlO AlP . 120 3 98 27 75 103 0 00 36 73 100 2 3 19 ,'-- f\ SER Quarterly Report July 20, 1998 Page 8 FOIlPA PROC PEND OD AlOD AlP CA lSTQTR 66 110 22 3 1 27 0 51 044 30 4 23 0 58 081 31 2 24 0 SER 2ND NUM QTR 3RD 1 QTR 4m QTR , Other Activities , Miscellaneous Activities c. Travel!Leave: Sherree L. Sturgis 4-14-1998 (meeting with City of Tallahassee officials about road realignment issues) 4-26 to 30, 1998 MSTC (Sentencing Training) Van Vandivier Annual Leave 5-26 to 5/29 & 6/12 Earl Cotton Military Leave 4-27 to 5-18 Patty DeJuneas 4-8&9 Johnson v. Moore (Brunswick) GereGooden Personnel Moves cc: Regional Director ( 2583 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT memorandum DATE: October 6, 1998 REPLY TO ATIN OF: Sherree L. Sturgis, Regional Counsel Bureau of Prisons, Southeast Region SUBJECT: TO: Fourth Quarter Report FY 98 (7/1/98 - 9/30/98) Wallace Cheney, General Counsel Bureau of Prisons ATTN: Amy Whalen Risley, Executive Assistant The following information is provided for the fourth quarter (July, Aug, Sept.) FY 1998. Litigation NUMBER OF ACTIONS FILED HABEAS CORPUS ACTIONS FTCA ACTIONS BIVENS ACTIONS OTHER (Mandamus, etc) NUMBER OF LITIGATION REPORTS NUMBER PENDING NUMBER CLOSED NUMBER OF HEARINGSITRIALS NUMBER OF SETTLEMENTS AMOUNT OF A WARD NUMBER OF CRIMINAL REFERRALS 49 26 2 18 3 10 661 155 See text below 2584 ( SER Quarterly Report October 6, 1998 Page 2 \ Significant Case Activity A. Civil MaUers Pamela Ruth Chilt~n. et al. v. United States, 4:96-CV-2533 CDP (E.D. Missouri) Trial was held in this case where the inmate committed suicide at FCI Jesup shortly after arrival and his prescription for was changed from Xanax to Lorazepam. The court found that the Government was negligent and awarded damages to the plaintiffs in the amount of$781,000. This consisted of $725,000 lost earnings, $50,000 intangible value and $6,000 funeral expenses. Salvador Ma~luta v. F. P. Sam Samples. et aI., App No. 97-8417 (11 th Cir.) The defendants reply brief was submitted to the court, arguing that the district court's dismissal of the plaintiffs Bivens action on the basis of the fugitive from justice doctrine was permissible and should be upheld. Maria Simon, DOJ Appellate Attorney, prepared and filed the brief for the defendants. We await the court's decision. Renee Clark v. United States of America, 1:97cv404-D-D (S.D. Miss.) This is the case where the female inmate was released 34 days late at TAL. She subsequently violated supervised release and was returned to custody. The 34 days were credited against her supervised rel.ease violator term. Largely because of this, we were able to settle this case for a minimal amount of$I,250. In view of the uncertainty of the outcome of this litigation and the possible damages ifliability was assessed, this is a favorable outcome. Alexanderv. Hawk. et aI., Appeal No. 96-3752 (11th Cir.) This case was dismissed bv . . the district court before service on the defendants, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Oral argument was held on August 27, 1998. DO] Attorney Peter Maier appeared and argued for the government that the PLRA supported the dismissal. B. SETTLEMENTS AND AWARDS: 7-7-98 Adverse Judgement, Chilton v. US, 4:96CV02533MLM: $781,000. Wrongful death. FTCA, suicide after change in antidepressant ~edication. 7-7-98 Settled for $75,000, EEO case of Sulayman Y...Jl.S, FGAS, 297-1 18. Case inn-lIves doctor at JES. C. SIGNIFICANT CASES. TRIALS OR HEARINGS: (See above) D. RELIGIOUS CASES: None E. ENSIGN AMENDMENT CASES: None 2585 SER Quarterly Report October 6, 1998 Page 3 (' F. PLRA 1915 DISMISSALS: None G. CRIMINAL CASES: New Cases: Update of Previously Reported Cases: No new information Federal Tort Claims ActlEmployee Claims: l " \ ... ' NUMBER FILED PERSONAL PROPERTY PERSONAL INJURY MEDICAL WRONGFUL DEATH PERSONAL INJURY AND PERSONAL PROPERTY NUMBER PAID AMOUNT PAID NUMBER DENIED NUMBER PENDING NUMBER OVERDUE AVERAGE PROCESSING TIME 148 120 22 1 o 5 6 $2115.85 108 100 3 12 FOIIPA NUMBER RECEIVED NUMBER CLOSED NUMBER PENDING TOTAL NUMBER OVERDUE NUMBER OVERDUE 30 DAYS NUMBER OF CIVIL ACTIONS 88 120 55 11 11 ? 2586 SER Quarterly Report October 6, 1998 Page 4 Quarterly Comparison: TORT CLAIMSIEMPLOYEE CLAIMS SER NUM PROP PI APPR AMT DEN PEND OD AlO AlP 1ST QTR 128 104 24 15 1703 58 120 3 98 27 2ND QTR 149 116 30 19 7029 75 103 o 00 36 3RDQTR 136 109 27 11 1724 73 100 2 3 19 4THQTR 148 120 22 06 2115 108 100 3 00 12 LITIGATION SER NUM HC FTC BIV OTH 1ST. QTR 54 31 5 13 2ND QTR 36 20 2 3RD QTR 42 22 4TH QTR 49 26 ANS PEN CLD H!f SET AWD 5 46 ? ? ? ? ? 12 2 14 4 12 2 10 542 23 2 18 3 10 661 155 / 2587 94 ( SER Quarterly Report October 6, 1998 Page 5 FOIIPA SER NUM PROC PEND OD A/OD AlP CA 1ST QTR 66 110 22 3 1 27 0 2ND QTR 51 044 30 4 1 23 0 3RD QTR 58 081 31 2 1 24 0 4TH QTR 88 120 55 11 3 30 0 Other Activities Miscellaneous Activities ( Sherree L. Sturgis: Travel - July 26-July 31, 1998; DC-Attorney and Paralegal Training July 15 - Settlement Conference, Savannah, Sulayman .Y.JlS. Annual Leave - July 6 August II & 14 Van Vandivier: Travel- ~uly 26-July 31, 1998; DC-Attorney and Paralegal Training September 14 - 18 - FC! Yazoo City Annual Leave - August 17 August 24 - September 2 Earl Cotton: Travel - July 5 - July 8; S1. Louis - Chilton v. US August 31 - September 3 - MSTC Sentencing Training Beverly Snell: Travel - August 20 & 21 - F1. Lauderdale - Porto case ( 2588 c SER Quarterly Report October 6, 1998 Page 6 Loretta Rich: Travel - July 5 - July 17 - Denver - Paralegal Training ( IV. Other Matters a. b. c. 7-24 Closing date for SERO FOI paralegal announcement 7-31 Former Regional Director, now USPO Jerry Williford retires A Regional Inquiry Team was dispatched to FCI Yazoo City to ',_ review the situation of an inmate who '1ent on· a hunger strike and was taken to an outside hOSPItal shortly before his release date, where he remains in a comatose state. Van Vandivier was assigned as attorney-advisor to the team. Preliminary information is that the inmate was intent on causing himself to be in a poor state of health when he was released so the State of Mississippi would be unwilling to assume responsibility for his medical care and so would not prosecute him on pending charges. A final report from the inquiry team should be available in the near future. V. Personnel Moves Jeffrey Sugg - first day as SERO Honors Attorney - August 17 Jennifer Merkle - last day at USP ATL - August 31 Tami Rippon - first day at FeI EDG - Septemb,er 2 Loretta Ellis - first day as FOI Legal Tech at COL - September 13 cc: Regional Director 2589