ICE Detention Standards Compliance Audit - McLennan County Detention Center, Waco, TX, ICE, 2007
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
• r a l o Detention and Removal Operations (I epartment of Homeland Security 89' 1 ourwinds Drive San Antonio, Texas 78239 u.s. Immigration and Customs Enforcement February 6, 2007 MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: John P. Torres Director of Detention and Removal Headquarters De b6,b7c s b6,b7c Reviewer- in Char San Antonio Detention and Removal Operations SUBJECT: Review Summary Report for McLennan Detention Center Annual Detention Review On January 22 and 22,2007 a review ofthe McLennan Detention County Center (MCDC), located within the San Antonio Region was conduct iew was performed under the supervision of b6,b7c b6,b7c Reviewer- in Charge (RIC). , SIEA, from the San Antonio Region, assisted the RIC. The review measured compliance with the National Detention Standards Operations; Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the original G-324a Detention Inspection Form and a copy of the worksheet. All original worksheets and working papers are maintained in the appropriate file system and are available for review by the Review Authority. Type of Review: This is the third annual review conducted by officers assigned to the San Antonio Region as directed by HQDRO. This review was conducted again to ensure the facility is still in compliance with the National Detention Standards Operations. At the time this inspection was conducted, the Agency had one detainee held at this facility. Review Summary: It was determined through this review that the McLennan County Detention Center is presently operating at "Good" overall level. The team members have identified a couple of minor issues. All ofthese issues have been discussed with the facility's Administrators, and they have indicated that they would be in full compliance with all the elements in each standard. Subject: Detention Revie.mmary Report Page 2 • Review Findings: This facility has kept up with all the elements in the National Detention Standards. All the elements in the National Detention Standards were in compliance. Each standard is identified and a short summary provided regarding standards or procedures that we discussed with their Administrator. Standards Summary Findings: The finding under the standard for the Detainees Fund and Personal Property was in compliance with the ICE National Detention Standards. The detainees' fund and property receipts were modified during our inspection in order to have to officers' signatures in order to meet the ICE standards. The Administrator was going to put an SOP for all staff involved in the process. The finding under the standard for the Food Service Detention Standard was in compliance with the ICE National Detention Standard. They did have one oftheir freezers thermostats stop working during our inspection. The Warden immediately called their maintenance department and places a work order to have it fix. RIC Observations: I was impressed with the way this facility was ready for our inspection and with their cooperation throughout the inspection. The facility was well kept and their staffs were sharp in answering any questions we had. RIC Issues and Concerns I had no issues or concerns with this facility. Recommended Rating and Justification: It is the Reviewer in Charge recommendation that the facility receive a rating of "overall." Good. RIC Assurance Statement: All findings of this review have been documented on Form G-324A and are supported by the written documentations contained in the review file. _ Department Of Homeland Security • Immigration and Customs Enforcement A. Type of Facility Reviewed D ICE Service Processing Center D ICE Contract Detention Facility k8] ICE Intergovernmental Service Agreement G. Accreditation Certificates List all State or National Accreditation[s] received: Texas Commission on Jail Standards D Check box if facility has no accreditation[ s] B. Current Inspection Type ofInspection k8] Field Office D HQ Inspection Date[s] of Facility Review January 22 and 23,2007 H. Problems 1 Complaints (Copies must be attached) The Facility is under Court Order or Class Action Finding D Class Action Order D Court Order The Facility has Significant Litigation Pending D Major Litigation D Life/Safety Issues k8] Check if None. C. PreviouslMost Recent Facility Review Date[s] of Last Facility Review Previous Rating D Superior k8] Good D Acceptable D Deficient D At-Risk D. Name and Location of Facilit Name McLennan County Dteetion Center Address (Street and Name) 520 Columbus Ave. City, State and Zip Code Waco, Texas 76701 County McLennan of Chief Executive Officer (Warden/OIC/Superintendent) Warden b6,b7c Tel Include Area Code) 254 b6,b7c Field Office / Sub-Office (List Office with oversight responsibilities) San Antonio, Texas Distance from Field Office Two and half Hours) E. ICE Information ctor (Last Name, Title and Duty Station) b6,b7c 1 Supervisory Immigration Customs Agent 1 San Antonio Name of Team Member 1 Title 1 Duty Location b6,b7c 1 Deportation Officer 1 San Antonio, Texas Name of Team Member 1 Title 1 Duty Location / 1 Name of Team Member / Title 1 Duty Location 1 / my F CDFIIGSA I norma £ f IOn 01 Contract Number I Date of Contract or IGSA J-080-99-0014 October 12, 1998 Basic Rates per Man-Day $41.95 Other Charges: (If None, Indicate N/A) N/A; .. , , Detention Facility Inspection Form Facilities Used Over 72 hours I. Facilit Date Built 1980 Date Last Remodeled or Upgraded N/A Date New Construction 1 Bedspace Added N/A Future Construction Planned DYes k8] No Date: Current Bedspace Future Bedspace (# New Beds only) 326 Number: NA Date: NA J. Total Facility Population Total Facility Intake for previous 12 months 22613 Total ICE Mandays for Previous 12 months 107,785 K. Classification Level (ICE SPCs and CDFs Only) I Adult Male I Adult Female L-1 L-2 L-3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A L. Facility Capacity Rated Operational Emergency Adult Male 241 241 241 Adult Female 85 85 85 Facility holds Juveniles Offenders 16 and older as Adults o M. Average Daily Population ICE I Adult Male 0 I Adult Female 0 I USMS 189 42 Other 9 27 N. Facility Staffing Level ort: b2High Estimated Man-days Per Year $100,000 Form G-324A (Rev. 8113/04) No Prior Version May Be Used After 1011104 • • Significant Incident Summary Worksheet For ICE to complete its review of your facility, the following information must be completed prior to the scheduled review dates. The information on this form should contain data for the past twelve months in the boxes provided. The information on this form is used in conjunction with the ICE Detention Standards in assessing your Detention Operations against the needs of the ICE and its detained population. This form should be filled out by the facility prior to the start of any inspection. Failure to complete this section will result in a delay in processing this report and the possible reduction or removal ofICE' detainees at your facility. Physical Assault: Offenders on Offenders! Assault: Detainee on Staff Number afForced Moves, inc!. Forced Cell moves 3 Disturbances 4 of Times Chemical # Times Four/Five Point Restraints applied/used Offender / Detainee Medical Referrals as a result of sustained. o o o o 6 4 2 o o o o o o o o o o o o 3 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 26 18 5 5 o o o o o A A o Escapes Grievances: Deaths o Psychiatric / Medical Referrals # Medical Cases referred for Outside Care # Psychiatric Cases referred for Outside Care o 2 4 5 9 0 o o o Any attempted physical contact or physical contact that involves two or more offenders Oral, anal or vaginal penetration or attempted penetration involving at least 2 parties, whether it is consenting or non-consenting Routine transportation of detainees/offenders is not considered "forced" Any incident that involves four or more detainees/offenders, includes gang fights, organized multiple hunger strikes, work stoppages, hostage situations, major fires, or other large scale incidents. Form G-324A (Rev. 8/13/04) No Prior Version May Be Used After 1011/04 • • 1. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Admission and Release Classification System Correspondence and Other Mail Detainee Handbook Food Service Funds and Personal Property Detainee Grievance Procedures Issuance and Exchange of Clothing, Bedding, and Towels Marriage Requests Non-Medical Emergency Escorted Trip Recreation Religious Practices V Work IJre")"..",,, 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Contraband Detention Files Disciplinary Policy Emergency Plans Environmental Health and Safety Hold Rooms in Detention Facilities Key and Lock Control Population Counts Post Orders Security Inspections Special Management Units (Administrative Segregation) Special Management Units (Disciplinary Segregation) Tool Control Transportation (Land management) Use of Force Staff / Detainee Communication (Added August 2003) Detainee Transfer (Added September 2004) 2. 3. 4. 5. All findings (Deficient and At-Risk) require written comment describing the finding and what is necessary to meet compliance. Form G-324A (Rev. 8/13/04) No Prior Version May Be Used After 10/1/04 RIC Review Assurance Statement By signing below, the Reviewer-In-Charge (RIC) certifies that all findings of noncompliance with policy or inadequate controls contained in the Inspection Report are supported by evidence that is sufficient and reliable. Furthermore, findings of noteworthy accomplishments are supported by sufficient and reliable evidence. Within the scope ofthe review, the facility is operating in accordance with applicable law and policy, and property and resources are efficiently used and adequately safeguarded, except for the deficiencies noted in the report. Reviewer-In-Charge: (Print Name) b6,b7c b6,b7c Title & Duty Location Febraury 7,2007 Superviasory Immgration Customs Agent / San Antonio, Texas Team Members Print Name, Title, & Duty Location Print Name, Title, & Duty Location b6,b7c Deportation Officer San Antonio, Texas Print Name, Title, & Duty Location Recommended Rating: Print Name, Title, & Duty Location o Superior IZI Good o Acceptable o Deficient OAt-Risk ,Comments: The finding of are supported by the findings of the review team and are documented within the Form G-324A and accompanying worksheets. Form G-324A (Rev. 8/13/04) No Prior Version May Be Used After 10/1/04 • • HEADQUARTERS EXECUTIVE REVIEW I Review Authority The signature below constitutes review of this report and acceptance by the Review Authority. OIC/CEO will have 30 days from receipt of this report to respond to all findings and recommendations. HQDRO EXECUTIVE REVIEW: (Please Print Name) b6,b7c b6,b7c b6,b7c Title Chief Final Rating: 0 Superior [2J Good Acceptable Deficient OAt-Risk No Rating o o o Comments: The Review Authority concurs with the Reviewer in Charge's recommended rating of "Good". Form G-324A (Rev. 8/1/01) No Prior Version May Be Used After 12/31/01