Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, Letter to FCC, Prison Phone Reform Supporters, 2015
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
Officers Chair Judith L. Lichtman National Partnership for Women & Families Vice Chairs Jacqueline Pata National Congress of American Indians Thomas A. Saenz Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund Hilary Shelton NAACP Treasurer Lee A. Saunders American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees Board of Directors Barbara Arnwine Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Helena Berger American Association of People with Disabilities Cornell William Brooks NAACP Lily Eskelsen García National Education Association Marcia D. Greenberger National Women's Law Center Chad Griffin Human Rights Campaign Linda D. Hallman AAUW Mary Kay Henry Service Employees International Union Sherrilyn Ifill NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Jo Ann Jenkins AARP Michael B. Keegan People for the American Way Samer E. Khalaf, Esq. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee Elisabeth MacNamara League of Women Voters of the United States Marc Morial National Urban League Mee Moua Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC Janet Murguía National Council of La Raza Debra Ness National Partnership for Women & Families Terry O’Neill National Organization for Women Priscilla Ouchida Japanese American Citizens League Rabbi Jonah Pesner Religious Action Center Of Reform Judaism Anthony Romero American Civil Liberties Union Shanna Smith National Fair Housing Alliance Richard L. Trumka AFL-CIO Randi Weingarten American Federation of Teachers Dennis Williams International Union, UAW Policy and Enforcement Committee Chair Michael Lieberman Anti-Defamation League President & CEO Wade J. Henderson Executive Vice President & COO Karen McGill Lawson October 15, 2015 Chairman Thomas Wheeler Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Rates for Inmate Calling Services, WC Docket No. 12-375 Dear Chairman Wheeler: On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the undersigned organizations, we write to urge the Federal Communications Commission to ensure residents of prisons, jails and detention centers receive access to reasonable rates for all their telephone calls. We thank you for capping long-distance rates in 2013 and encourage you to quickly complete your current proceeding to ensure the remaining 85 percent of calls—those that are in-state—are also addressed. Unreasonably high prison phone rates are problematic for a variety of reasons. They: x Vastly exceed rates paid by non-incarcerated people. For example, a 15-minute call can cost up to $6 in Virginia and Louisiana. Many states charge a per-call fee and an additional 24 cents per minute, even for debit calling when payments are provided upfront, meaning no collection costs are incurred. 1 Fees and ancillary charges include egregious examples such as charging $8 for each $150 deposited into a prepaid calling account. 2 x Exploit a market failure depriving consumers the benefit of competition. While competition would be everyone’s first choice for constraining telephone prices, individuals paying for prison phone calls are literally a captive market unable to shop around for lower prices. Instead, correctional institutions select telephone providers. These institutions demand a “commission” or payment from the telephone company chosen, the cost of which is passed on to family members footing the bill. In this case, competition drives prices further and further upward. x Unjustly punish the families of people who are incarcerated. Incarcerated people rarely pay for their own telephone calls. Typically friends and family members submit funds into an account, or accept collect calls, in order to communicate. Thus, these friends, family, clergy, attorneys and others bear the annual $1.2 billion in telephone costs. As Right on Crime explains, the correctional system should help “preserve families.” 3 October 15, 2015 Page 2 of 2 x Contribute to rising costs of incarceration by increasing recidivism. Maintaining the bonds of a family and support network is an effective way to reduce recidivism among incarcerated people, which in turn reduces the cost of the criminal justice system. According to a 2011 Pew report, corrections in the states cost about $52 billion a year nationally and 43 percent of prisoners nationally return to the lockup within three years. Reducing those numbers could save hundreds of millions of dollars per year. Sound public policy dictates that we should not disincentivize the very behavior that will help us keep families together and, in turn, reduce future crime. x Are unnecessary. A number of state departments of corrections (DOCs) have demonstrated they can provide communications services at reasonable rates. States such as South Carolina, New Mexico, New York and Pennsylvania DOCs charge in-state rates between 4 and 6 cents per minute for a 15-minute call. 4 Exorbitant rates paid by prisoners’ families increase recidivism, place an undue and unfair financial burden, contribute to increasing costs, and are unnecessary. Congress has given the FCC special authority to address telephone rates in incarcerating institutions and it should use that authority to cap in-state prison phone call rates, thereby making our communities safer. Please contact Leadership Conference Media/Telecommunications Task Force Co-Chair Cheryl Leanza, UCC O.C., Inc., at 202-841-6033 or Corrine Yu, Leadership Conference Managing Policy Director, at 202-466-5670, if you would like to discuss the above issues. Sincerely, American Civil Liberties Union Arizona Innocence Project Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC Adele Bernhard, Director, New York Law School Post-Conviction Innocence Clinic Center for Community Change Action Karen L. Daniel, Director, Center on Wrongful Convictions Data & Society Demand Progress Innocence Project Midwest Innocence Project Professor Marla L. Mitchell-Cichon, Director, WMU Cooley Innocence Project Montana Innocence Project NAACP National Organization for Women 1 National Urban League Pennsylvania Innocence Project Public Knowledge Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights Robert F. Kennedy Children’s Action Corps Robert F. Kennedy Juvenile Justice Collaborative Robert F. Kennedy National Resource Center for Juvenile Justice Rocky Mountain Innocence Center The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights United Church of Christ, OC Inc. Wrongful Conviction Project, Office of the Ohio Public Defender See Comments of the Human Rights Defense Center, Appendix C, FCC Docket WC 12-375 (filed Jan. 12, 2015). Prison Policy Initiative, Please Deposit All Your Money (2013). 3 See The Conservative Case for Reform, available at: http://rightoncrime.com/the-conservative-case-for-reform/. 4 See HRDC Comments, supra, at 6. 2