Repurposing - New Beginnings for Closed Prisons
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS Repurposing: New Beginnings for Closed Prisons Since 2011, at least 22 states have closed or announced closures for 94 state prisons and juvenile facilities, resulting in the elimination of over 48,000 state prison beds1 and an estimated cost savings of over $345 million.2 The opportunity to downsize prison bed space has been brought about by declines in state prison populations as well as increasing challenges of managing older facilities. Reduced capacity has created the opportunity to repurpose closed prisons for a range of uses outside of the correctional system, including a movie studio, a distillery, and urban redevelopment. The U.S. prison population numbered 1,508,636 at yearend 2014 – a reduction of approximately 1% since 2013. Thirty-nine states have experienced a decline since reaching their peak prison populations within the past 15 years; in most states this reduction has been relatively modest. Four states – New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and California – have reduced their prison populations by over 20%. Southern states like Mississippi and South Carolina have reduced their prison populations by 18% and 11% respectively.3 The political environment shaping criminal justice policy has been moving in a direction emphasizing evidence-based approaches to public safety for more than a decade. This has involved efforts to address the unprecedented growth and correctional costs resulting from several decades of policy initiatives. In recent years, 29 states adopted reforms that scaled back the scope and severity of their mandatory sentencing policies.4 Voters in California approved ballot initiatives in 2012 and 2016; the former curbed the state’s notoriously broad “three strikes and you’re out” law and the latter expanded parole eligibility and limits the process governing juveniles tried as adults. California and Oklahoma voters also authorized reclassifying certain felonies as misdemeanors. In other states, policymakers have become increasingly supportive of initiatives that reduce parole revocations, establish treatment courts, and divert prison bound defendants through alternatives to incarceration. OPPORTUNITY FOR CLOSURE Declines in state prison populations and the shifting politics underlying incarceration have created an opportunity to downsize prison bed space for a range of reasons, including excess capacity and the challenge of managing older facilities. UNDERLYING CAUSES OF STATE RATES OF IMPRISONMENT The previous 40 years of growth of the penal system increased rates of incarceration have resulted from changes in policy and practice intent upon increasing the severity of sanctions for criminal offending. The punitive nature of these criminal justice policies was influenced by social, political, economic and institutional forces that helped to explain why elected officials and prosecutors successfully pursued such initiatives. Several factors made the United States vulnerable to the politicization of criminal justice policies. These included social and political unrest in the 1960s; a major electoral realignment as the Democratic Party divided over civil rights and other issues and as the Republican Party became competitive in the South for the first time since Reconstruction; rising crime rates beginning in the mid-1960s; and major transformations in urban economies that included the disappearance of many well-paid jobs The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 1 POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS States with Closures and Pending Closures of Correctional Facilities 2011-2016 States closing or considering prison closures for low skilled workers. Distinct characteristics of U.S. society deepened the politicization of criminal justice policy. These included the election and partisan political appointment of judges and prosecutors, a winner-take-all two-party electoral system, and the use of state ballot initiatives and referenda as a mechanism for policy change.5 While rising crime rates in the early years of prison building contributed in part to increasing rates of imprisonment, it is only by understanding those trends in their social, political, institutional and historical context that it is clear the nation’s prison population increase was not primarily due to rising crime. While most other Western democracies also experienced rising crime rates beginning in the 1960s, none embarked on a prison expansion program remotely like that of the U.S. PRISON REPURPOSING PROJECTS Prison closures offer a challenge to officials and the communities that are impacted, particularly in rural areas with limited employment opportunities. In recent years, entrepreneurs, elected officials and community leaders in a handful of states have reimagined sites that once incarcerated prisoners for new uses. In Manhattan, the Osborne Association, a nonprofit organization, is working to convert a closed women’s prison into a space that provides services to women leaving incarceration. An entrepreneur in California purchased a closed correctional facility and plans to repurpose it as a medical marijuana cultivation center. At least four states – Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia – have converted closed prisons into tourist destinations open to visitors and host Halloween events.6 The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 2 POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS Other new purposes for closed prisons include a small farm incubator, homeless shelter, museum and special events venue, and a distillery. BRUSHY MOUNTAIN STATE PENITENTIARY (TENNESSEE, MAXIMUM SECURITY PRISON): DISTILLERY AND TOURIST ATTRACTION ARTHUR KILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (NEW YORK, MEDIUM SECURITY PRISON): MOVIE STUDIO Tennessee opened the maximum security prison in 1896 in the remote, southern part of the Appalachian Plateau. The prison had a capacity of 584 and was used as the state’s reception/classification and diagnostic center before closing in 2009. Opened in 1976, the prison housed 931 male inmates and closed in 2011. The former prison sits on 69 acres of waterfront property along Staten Island’s West Shore and is surrounded by commercial, recreational, and industrial properties. The site was previously operated by the state’s Office of Drug Abuse Services as a drug rehabilitation center prior to its transfer to the New York Department of Correctional Services.7 The Empire State Development agency announced in early 2014 that Brooklyn’s Broadway Stages planned to buy the facility for use as a movie studio. The studio purchased the prison for $7 million and plans to invest at least $20 million. Expectations for the project include the creation of 800 jobs over a two-year period with as many as 1,500 over the next five years. BAYVIEW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (NEW YORK, MEDIUM SECURITY PRISON): REENTRY CENTER First established in Manhattan in 1931 as the Seaman’s House Y.M.C.A., a place for merchant sailors to stay while their ships were docked at the nearby Chelsea Piers it later became a state-run drug treatment center in 1967. The state converted the center to a prison in the early 1970s following an increase in New York’s prison population due in part to a change in policy that required lengthy prison terms for prison bound drug defendants. The NoVo Foundation, a private foundation in collaboration with the women’s real-estate development company the Goren Group, will convert the closed prison to an office building known as the Women’s Building. Officials plan to contract out with nonprofit organizations that provide services to women. The building’s development team is also collaborating with groups like the Coalition for Women Prisoners and the Women and Justice Project to involve formerly incarcerated women in the prison’s repurposing. Plans for the prison’s redevelopment include landscaped areas and an art gallery that may double as an event space. Efforts are underway to repurpose the closed prison into a distillery and tourist attraction. Brushy Mountain Group, a private developer entity, approached the local economic development council and county officials to discuss plans for the prison’s reuse. Voters approved the prison’s conversion by a 2-1 margin in a referendum during the 2013 local election cycle. The private consortium has moved to transform the site into a tourist attraction, including a “moonshine” distillery, restaurant, horse trails, and campgrounds. DAWSON STATE JAIL (TEXAS, MEDIUM SECURITY PRISON): URBAN REDEVELOPMENT Opened in 1997, the Dawson State Jail (DSJ) was a co-gender facility with a capacity of over 2,200 beds located near Dallas. Reports of inadequate medical care, including multiple inmate deaths, and unsafe staffing levels at the facility led a coalition of state and national groups to mobilize in support of the prison’s closing. Texas state lawmakers in 2013 decided not to renew the contract for the prison operated by the for-profit CoreCivic (Corrections Corporation for America), but owned by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. DSJ was located in an area targeted for economic development; modest declines in the state’s prison population resulted in shuttering the prison rather than a transfer to public control. The prison was a co-gender facility with a capacity of over 2,200 beds. The closure of the DSJ was supported by local officials. The closed prison opened up an opportunity for the Trinity River Corridor Project a plan for urban development around a 20-mile area that would include houses, waterfront condominiums, office buildings and shops and restaurants. DSJ was long viewed as an impediment to moving the development plan forward. As of 2016, plans to demolish the existing jail or repurpose the shuttered correctional facility have yet to be decided.8 The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 3 POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS FULTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (NEW YORK, MEDIUM SECURITY PRISON): REENTRY CENTER HANNA CITY WORK CAMP (ILLINOIS, MINIMUM SECURITY PRISON): SMALL FARM INCUBATOR The Fulton Correctional Facility in the Bronx, New York was converted to a medium security prison in 1975. The building opened as an Episcopal Church in 1906 and since its construction at various times had housed a nursing home, drug rehabilitation center, and Jewish community center. The shuttered prison was among 13 state prisons closed in 2011. While used as a prison, the facility housed up to 900 inmates on work release. The site of the Hanna City Work Camp in Peoria, Illinois was not always used for a prison. The United States Air Force once used the former work camp site for radar tracking; that ended in 1968 due to budget cuts, and was soon repurposed as a state correctional facility. The prison closed in 2002 for budgetary reasons, and the state signed over the prison camp to Peoria County in 2008. The property transfer came with conditions including a requirement that its repurposing be for public use. During 2015, New York City transferred the facility’s deed to the Osborne Association, a criminal justice reform group. Osborne is managing the complete reconfiguration of the building from a prison to a community reentry hub for formerly incarcerated individuals that includes temporary housing and job training. Resources to support the building’s conversion include a $6 million grant from the Empire State Development Corporation, a state fund established to support economic development in communities experiencing prison closures. The Peoria County Board has convened discussions to repurpose the shuttered facility. Community consensus has focused on using the site as a small farm incubator that includes training and marketing; the site will also serve as a distribution center for locally grown food. According to the University of Illinois, transforming the former prison into a re-imagined agricultural development center will produce an estimated $124 million in new farm income for the region. GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (FLORIDA, MEDIUM SECURITY PRISON): HOMELESS CENTER HAYWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER (NORTH CAROLINA, MINIMUM SECURITY PRISON): HOMELESS SHELTER Opened in 1991 with a capacity of 507 beds, the prison was closed in 2012 due to budget cuts, and the site was acquired by the city of Gainesville. The shuttered prison is surrounded by a wooded area about a mile from the regional airport. City commissioners repurposed the former prison into, Grace Marketplace, a nonprofit one-stop homeless center that provides job training as well as programs for the broader community like organizational meeting space. Stakeholders are working to remodel the facility so that it looks less like a prison; the renovated mess hall has new tiling and there is a raised-bed garden on the grounds. The center is funded by a combination of resources from the city of Gainesville and the surrounding county for its first year of operation. The Haywood Correctional Center was opened more than 70 years ago with a capacity of 128 beds. It was closed in 2011 as part of a cost-saving measure. The repurposing of the prison was developed by Sheriff Greg Christopher, who collaborated with area churches, and business and community stakeholders to attract funding to underwrite the project. County Commissioners purchased it from the state and anticipated continuing to use it for correctional purposes as an overflow jail for the area’s local justice population. Those plans shifted in recent years, with a focus now on converting the closed prison to a multi-use site that includes a halfway house, homeless shelter and soup kitchen. Plans to convert the closed prison also involve leasing building space to other nonprofit agencies to increase the level of services available on the site. Conversion to a homeless shelter was done as a part of television personality Ty Pennington’s nationwide contest, the Ultimate Give Back Challenge, and received broad support among fans who were invited to vote on which project the initiative would select. The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 4 POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS States with Closures and Pending Closures of Correctional Facilities 2011-2016 State Correctional Facility AK Palmer Correctional Facility CA California Rehabilitation Center CO Colorado State Penitentiary II CO Capacity9 Year10 State Correctional Facility Capacity 176 2016 LA J. Levy Dabadie Correctional Center 3,900 2012 LA Jetson Center for Youth 316 2012 MI Kit Carson Correctional Center 1,400 2016 CO Fort Lyon Correctional Facility 500 CT Bergin Correctional Institution CT Year 300 2012 76 2014 Florence Crane Correctional Facility 1,056 2011 MI Pugsley Correctional Facility 1,334 2016 2011 MS Walnut Grove Correctional Facility 1,260 2016 603 2011 NV Nevada State Prison 841 2011 Enfield Correctional Institution 724 2011 NY Arthur Kill Medium Security Prison 900 2011 CT Fairmont Building at Bridgeport Correctional Center 204 2015 NY Beacon Correctional Facility 201 2013 CT J.B. Gates Correctional Institution 878 2011 NY Bayview Correctional Facility 229 2013 CT Niantic Annex 450 2016 NY Buffalo Work Release 132 2011 CT Somers Housing Units 400 2016 NY Butler Correctional Facility 240 2013 FL Brevard Correctional Facility 929 2011 NY Camp Georgetown 262 2011 FL Broward Correctional Institution 611 2012 NY Chateaugay Correctional Facility 240 2013 FL Caryville Work Camp 133 2012 NY Fulton Work Release 258 2011 FL Demily Correctional Institution 342 2012 NY Summit Shock Incarceration Correctional Facility 121 2011 FL Gainesville Correctional Institution 507 2012 NY Oneida Medium Correctional Facility 998 2011 FL Hendry Work Camp 280 2012 NY Mid-Orange Correctional Facility 736 2011 FL Hillsborough Correctional Institution 431 2011 NY 300 2013 FL Indian River Correctional Institution 381 2012 Monterey Shock Incarceration Correctional Facility FL Levy Forestry Camp 292 2012 NY Mt. McGregor Correctional Facility 544 2013 FL New River Correctional Institution 1,363 2012 NC Bladen Correctional Center 172 2013 FL River Junction Work Camp 736 2012 NC 104 2014 FL Tallahassee Road prison 82 2011 Buncombe Correctional Center (consolidated with Craggy Correctional Center) Blakely Regional Youth Detention Center NC Cabarrus Correctional Facility 198 2011 GA 30 2011 NC Charlotte Correctional Center 256 2011 GA Griffin Regional Youth Detention Center 30 2011 NC Duplin Correctional Center 328 2013 GA Metro State Prison 779 2011 NC Durham Correctional Center 216 2011 GA Paulding Regional Youth Detention Center 100 2013 NC Fountain Correctional Center For Women 531 2014 IL Dwight Correctional Center 1,212 2012 NC Haywood Correctional Center 128 2011 IL Joliet Renaissance Center – Youth Center 344 2012 NC North Piedmont Correctional Center for Women 144 2014 IL Murphysboro Youth Prison 156 2012 NC 144 2014 IL Tamms Super Maximum Security Correctional Center Raleigh Correctional Center for Women (consolidated with NCCIW) 700 2012 NC Robeson Correctional Center12 276 2013 IL Statesville F. House11 386 2016 KY Marion Adjustment Center 826 2013 NC Tillery Correctional Center (consolidated with Caledonia Correctional Institution) 208 2014 KY Otter Creek Correctional Center 656 2012 NC Wayne Correctional Center 428 2013 708 2014 50 2011 LA C. Paul Phelps Correctional Center 942 2012 NC Western Youth Institution LA Forcht-Wade Correctional Center 498 2012 OR Hillcrest Units (Chi and Kappa) 13 The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 5 POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS States with Closures and Pending Closures of Correctional Facilities 2011-2016 (continued) State Correctional Facility OR MacLaren Units (Dunbard, Kincaid and McBride) 75 2011 OR Oak Creek Unit (Young Women’s Transition Program) 25 2011 OR Oregon State Penitentiary – Minimum Security 176 2011 PA Cresson State Correctional Institution 1,400 2013 PA Greensburg State Correctional Institution 988 2013 RI Donald Price Medium Security Facility 324 2011 TX Al Price State Juvenile Correctional Facility 248 2011 TX Central Unit 1,000 2011 TX Crockett State School 232 2011 TX Dawson State Jail 2,216 2013 TX Mineral Wells Facility14 2,100 2011/ 2013 TX Ron Jackson Juvenile Correctional Complex Unit II 113 2011 TX TDCJ – Burnett County Jail 240 2011 SC Watkins Pre-Release Center 224 2012 SC Campbell Pre-Release Center 246 2015 SC Coastal Pre-Release Center 187 2015 SC Lower-Savannah Pre-Release Center 250 2016 VA Cold Springs Work Center 140 2014 VA James River Correctional Center 450 2011 VA Mecklenburg Correctional Center 730 2012 VA Powhatan Main Correctional Center 850 2014 VA White Post Diversion Center 107 2014 WA McNeil Island Corrections Center 1,200 2011 WI Ethan Allen School 167 2011 WI Southern Oaks Girls School 18 2011 Total Operational Capacity Capacity Year 48,944 The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 6 POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS CONSIDERATIONS IN PRISON CLOSURE Prison closures provide an opening to reimagine economic challenges in impacted communities. Closures typically animate resistance due to a perceived loss of jobs, tax revenue and other factors. To address this, New York State requires a one-year notice of correctional facilities’ closures.15 But, these developments are not uniform across the country. In contrast to this trend, some states have announced since 2013 that they may open new correctional facilities, add new beds to existing facilities, or reopen facilities that had previously been shuttered. In other states, closure announcements have faced opposition. In Illinois for example, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the union representing correctional officers, unsuccessfully opposed efforts to close down two state prisons in recent years through legislative strategies, litigation, and a public campaign.16 In Texas, local political leadership opposed that state’s decision to not renew a private prison contract for the Mineral Wells Pre-Parole Transfer Facility owned and operated by CCA.17 Many local officials embraced prison construction as an economic development strategy. But the research shows that the benefits are not clear.18 Generally, prison closure proponents counter that prisons are not a source of economic opportunity. Yet, those rejoinders ignore the history of prison development particularly on communities impacted by declines in agriculture. High-incarceration communities, the neighborhoods that send many individuals to prison, also suffer economic loss. These neighborhoods experience substantial disadvantage due to economic divestment, political disenfranchisement, and downward mobility caused by the cycling of residents to and from prison.19 Lawmakers and practitioners working to scale back harsh sentencing policies while also downsizing prison capacity will need to engage in intentional discussions of the economic impact of a prison closure. New York officials engaged this conversation directly through efforts anchored by the Empire State Development office as part of the Economic Transformation and Facility Redevelopment Program. Legislators authorized the program to support the economies of communities affected by the closure of certain correctional and juvenile justice facilities. Program staff convened conversations in the affected communities for the reuse of closed correctional facilities. The program also facilitated an economic development initiative with business firms interested in relocating to affected communities through tax incentives.20 JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES There were 1,195 fewer juvenile facilities in 2014 than 2000, a 39 percent decline.21 While facilities of all sizes have closed, the greatest declines have been in the number of large juvenile facilities (those holding more than 200 juveniles). There were 100 such facilities in 2000 and 22 as of 2014. The largest facilities are expensive to maintain, but they also provide fewer tailored services than small facilities, increasing the chances of reoffending. The dual trends of closing large juvenile facilities and declining numbers of juveniles in placement have changed the typical juvenile placement. In 2000, 34,147 juveniles (31 percent of all juveniles in placement) were held in large facilities. By 2014, 5,768 juveniles (11 percent) were held in these large facilities. In recent years, some states that closed juvenile facilities have transferred them to the adult correctional system. For example, in Illinois a closed juvenile prison in Murphysboro is being repurposed as a reentry center that provides job training and life skills including basic finance to incarcerated persons.22 PRISON DOWNSIZING AS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PHASING OUT FOR-PROFIT PRISONS Some prisons have closed following the termination of a contract due to prison population declines or other factors. In recent years states like Colorado, Mississippi, Kentucky, and Texas have closed privately owned or managed prisons. During 2016, the Department of Justice announced plans to phase out the use of private for-profit prisons to house persons convicted of federal offenses. The Obama administration cited declines in the federal prison population as one reason for-profit contracts could be phased out. As of 2016, BOP maintained contracts with 13 private prisons. The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 7 POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS REINVESTING JUSTICE SAVINGS Prison closures offer an opportunity for state officials and community leaders to reimagine spending on public safety priorities. In recent decades public safety has been viewed as monies prioritized towards law enforcement, prison construction and maintenance, and other services supporting the criminal justice system. However, growing bipartisan support among elected officials at the federal and state level has contributed to a shifting climate for criminal justice policies and practices to support interventions outside of the criminal justice system. Prison closures offer an opportunity for state officials and community leaders to reimagine spending on public safety priorities. Justice reinvestment acknowledges the collateral impacts of mass incarceration on many urban neighborhoods. These impacts can perpetuate cycles of crime and incarceration. Billions of dollars are spent each year to imprison large numbers of people from low-income urban neighborhoods. A justice reinvestment approach would redirect some portion of the funds states now spend on prisons to rebuild the social capital and local infrastructure – quality schools, community centers, and healthcare facilities – in high incarceration neighborhoods.23 A salient provision of the strategy achieves cost savings by reducing prison populations through the rethinking of excessive and costly prison terms and reducing recidivism for individuals who return to high incarceration communities. Political and public support for prison closures is often dependent on projected savings due to the shuttering of correctional facilities. Justice reinvestment offers the residents of high incarceration communities a framework to reclaim public money that has been used to support unproductive corrections spending. Kansas officials initiated an ambitious justice reinvestment experiment in 2006. Officials implemented a neighborhood revitalization strategy in a high incarceration community to strengthen recidivism reduction efforts. Following a research initiative to determine the jurisdiction with the highest rate of incarceration, correctional officials established a reentry program in Wichita’s Council District 1 where persons returned to prison for pro- bation and parole violations resulted in $5.5 million in prison costs.24 Reentry specialists were hired to develop affordable housing under collaboration between the Department of Corrections, the Housing Resources Commission, and the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.25 State officials in Connecticut and Colorado have also initiated justice reinvestment policies. Connecticut lawmakers authorized legislation in 2003 that earmarked $7.5 million for justice reinvestment in New Haven following sentencing reforms to address prison growth. Colorado lawmakers discussed reprioritizing scarce resources towards other social services during private prison contract discussions. One 2012 budget proposal would have re-appropriated $5.4 million from private prisons to support childhood literacy, while another would have transferred $1.5 million from private prisons to support programs that help needy and disabled individuals.26 However, the proposals did not advance through the legislative process. CONCLUSION In recent years, criminal justice reform has regularly been raised at the state level. Officials working to rein in budgets have successfully explored incarceration alternatives to reduce state prison populations without compromising public safety. The circumstances surrounding prison closures vary from state to state and create challenges and opportunities. Prison population reductions have created an opening to close prisons; in some communities there have been intentional discussions about repurposing prisons for non-correctional uses. Practical examples of prison reuse projects have taken place in various jurisdictions including Illinois, New York, Florida, Tennessee, and Texas. The areas surrounding these reuse projects are also diverse and include rural, suburban, and urban communities. Planning for prison repurposing has involved the participation of a range of stakeholders including executive, legislative, and local leadership in addition to the participation of practitioners and engaged community members. Circumstances in New York and North Carolina led officials to downsize prison capacity. Michigan27 and Illinois, which have previously shuttered prisons, have since taken steps to reopen closed facilities. In Illinois, officials are repurposing a closed youth prison as a reentry facility, focused on preparing incarcerated persons to return to their communities.28 The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 8 POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS Yet efforts to close prisons often face resistance. The closure of correctional facilities has created challenges for communities including job losses, and declines in property tax revenue. Officials have responded in various ways that include selling closed prisons to other agencies for continued correctional purposes and managing empty prisons in anticipation of future population increases. Illinois officials sold the closed Thomson Correctional Center to the overcrowded federal Bureau of Prisons for $165 million to house persons convicted of federal offenses.29 States like Michigan have continued to manage previously closed prisons. In 2012, Michigan officials reopened the Muskegon Correctional Facility which had closed in 2010; Pennsylvania prisoners were incarcerated there during 2011.30 States have also advanced efforts to add new prison capacity. Despite plans for shuttering the Jetson Center for Youth, Louisiana officials plan to open the Acadiana Center for Youth, with an operational capacity of 72 beds at a cost of more than $20 million.31 Other states that have publicly discussed adding new capacity in recent years include Alabama, Arkansas, Hawaii, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Virginia. Reimagining the use for a closed prison offers states and local communities opportunities to address the scale of incarceration. The public will benefit from strategic efforts that rethink the use of closed correctional facilities to advance a vision that strengthens resources and communities. The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 9 POLICY BRIEF: REPURPOSING PRISONS ENDNOTES 1 State prison closures documented based on information requests and public reports. 2 Estimate based on projected savings from states that disclosed this information. 3 Nazgol Ghandnoosh. U.S. Prison Population Trends 1999-2014: Broad Variation Among States in Recent Years. (The Sentencing Project 2016), available at http://www.sentencingproject.org/. publications/u-s-prison-population-trends-1999-2014-broad-variation-among-states-in-recent-years/. 4 Ram Subramanian and Ruth Delaney. Playbook for Change? States Reconsider Mandatory Sentences. (Vera Institute of Justice 2014), available at http://www.vera.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/mandatory-sentences-policy-report-v3. 5 Supra, National Research Council. 6 Jen Fiffield, “Shuttered State Prisons Spring Back to Life,” Pew Stateline November 3, 2016. Download from: http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/ research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2016/11/03/shuttered-state-prisons-spring-back-to-life. 7 Staff, “Prison is Opposed on Staten Island,” The New York Times April 21, 1976. Download from: http://www.nytimes.com/1976/04/21/archives/ prison-is-opposed-on-staten-island-plan-to-convert-drug-center.html?_r=0. 8 See Catherine Arnold, “Healing Dallas by Repurposing its Abandoned Jails,” The Texas Observer (2014). Downloaded from: https://www. texasobserver.org/healing-dallas-repurposing-abandoned-jails/. 9 The operational capacity of a correctional facility refers to the number of persons a prison can safely hold given factors such as the architectural design and the number of staff for the institution. 10 This was the year the closure first announced. The actual closure date may be in subsequent years. 11 Reported capacity as of September 2016. Monique Garcia and Duaa Eldeib. “Rauner to shutter ‘terrible,’ outdated part of Stateville prison,” Chicago Tribune. October 14, 2016. 12 Reopened for probation violators in 2014. 13 Partially reopened for probation violators. 14 Mineral Wells is a privately run facility owned and managed by the Corrections Corporation of America. During 2011, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice reduced the contract by 500 beds. During 2013, state officials ended the contract for the 2,100 beds at the private prison. 15 New York Correction Law Section 79-a. 16 James Ridgeway and Jean Casella, “Solidarity and Solitary: When Unions Clash With Prison Reform,” Solitary Watch. February 21, 2013. 17 Chris Agee, “Mineral Wells pre-parole transfer prison set to close,” The Weatherford Democrat. June 14, 2013, online at: http://www.weatherforddemocrat.com/news/local_news/mineral-wells-pre-parole-transfer-prison-set-to-close/article_d652e55e-37fc-5f1c-9643-0728ddade534.html. 18 See Ryan S. King, Marc Mauer and Tracy Huling, “Big Prisons, Small Towns: Prison Economics in Rural America,” The Sentencing Project, 2003. 19 Jim Austin et. al, “Ending Mass Incarceration Charting a New Justice Reinvestment,” 2013, online at: http://sentencingproject.org/wp-content/ uploads/2015/12/Ending-Mass-Incarceration-Charting-a-New-Justice-Reinvestment.pdf 20 Staff, “Economic Transformation and Facility Redevelopment Program Report,” Empire State Development. 2014, online at: http://esd.ny.gov/ Reports/ECONOMICTRANSFORMATIONPROGRAMREPORT.pdf 21 OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Online. Available: http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/corrections/qa08501.asp?qaDate=2014. 22 Governor Bruce Rauner. “Gov. Rauner: In name of justice, I’m closing Stateville’s F House,” Chicago Sun Times (2016). available at http://chicago. suntimes.com/opinion/gov-rauner-in-name-of-justice-im-closing-statevilles-f-house/. 23 Susan B. Tucker and Eric Cadora, “Ideas for an Open Society: Justice Reinvestment,” The Open Society Institute. 2003. 24 Michael Thompson, Tony Fabelo and Eric Cadora, “Building Community Capacity to Reduce Crime and Save Prison Space” (Council of State Governments PowerPoint presentation to the Wichita Summit, April 18, 2005). 25 Kansas Department of Corrections 2009 Annual Report, online at http://www.doc.ks.gov/publications/2009 Annual Report KDOC.pdf. 26 Ivan Moreno, “Colo. House debates $7.4 billion spending plan,” The Associated Press. April 12, 2012. 27 Matt Sumner, “Northern Michigan prison reopens to replace closing corrections facility,” WMCU.org, October 9, 2015. 28 Governor Bruce Rauner, “Governor Rauner Announces Significant Steps in Reforming Illinois’ Criminal Justice System,” online at: http://www3. illinois.gov/PressReleases/ShowPressRelease.cfm?SubjectID=3&RecNum=13854 Office of the Governor. October 14, 2016. 29 John Presta, “Governor Quinn Announces the Sale of Thomson Correctional Center to the Feds” Examiner.com, October 2, 2012. 30 Staff, “West Michigan prison closed in 2011 reopens, new inmates scheduled to arrive next week,” The Associated Press. October 5, 2012. 31 Staff, “Acadiana Center for Youth Opening Delayed,” Correctional News, April 5, 2016. This briefing paper was written by Nicole D. Porter, Director of State Advocacy at The Sentencing Project. Updated December 15, 2016. 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 The Sentencing Project works for a fair and effective U.S. justice system by promoting reforms in sentencing policy, addressing unjust racial disparities and practices, and advocating for alternatives to incarceration. sentencingproject.org The Sentencing Project • 1705 DeSales Street NW, 8th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 • sentencingproject.org 10