Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities 2004, DOJ BJS, 2005
Download original document:
![Brief thumbnail](/media/cache/e9/28/e928eec6b3983c1a9339746c73061475.jpg)
Document text
![Brief thumbnail](/media/cache/e9/28/e928eec6b3983c1a9339746c73061475.jpg)
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report July 2005, NCJ 210333 Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 By Allen J. Beck, Ph.D. and Timothy A. Hughes BJS Statisticians On September 4, 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-79). The legislation requires the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) to develop new national data collections on the incidence and prevalence of sexual violence within correctional facilities. This report fulfills the requirement under Sec. 4 (c)(1) of the act for submission of an annual report on the activities of the Bureau with respect to prison rape. As an initial step in a multiphase implementation strategy, BJS completed the first-ever national survey of administrative records on sexual violence in adult and juvenile correctional facilities. Although data are limited to incidents reported to correctional authorities during 2004, the survey provides an understanding of how administrators respond to sexual violence. The survey also collects basic counts of substantiated incidents, characteristics of victims and perpetrators, and sanctions imposed. Survey results should not be used to rank systems or facilities. Future data collections, including victim reports of sexual violence in surveys of current and former inmates, are being developed to permit reliable comparisons. Highlights Survey selected more than 2,700 correctional facilities holding 79% of all adults and juveniles in custody Total Number of facilities 2,730 Population covered 1,754,092 Prison systems 1,404 1,318,616 Local jails 404 331,768 Private prisons/jails 32 31,086 State juvenile systems* 510 41,196 Local/private juvenile facilities 297 21,739 Other facilities 83 9,705 *Includes the District of Columbia. y The survey met the requirement that BJS draw a random sample, or other scientifically appropriate sample, of not less than 10 percent of facilities. y Entire systems were selected to maximize reporting coverage. Local and private facilities were selected with probabilities proportionate to the number of adults or juveniles held. 8,210 allegations of sexual violence reported Nationwide in 2004 Total Prison systems Local jails Private prisons/jails State juvenile systems Local/private juvenile facilities Other facilities Reported in survey 5,528 National estimate 8,210 3,456 699 67 3,456 1,700 210 931 931 359 16 1,890 20 y 42% of allegations involved staff sexual misconduct; 37%, inmate-oninmate nonconsensual sexual acts; 11%, staff sexual harassment; and 10%, abusive sexual contact. y Correctional authorities reported 3.15 allegations of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates held in 2004. Correctional authorities substantiated nearly 2,100 incidents of sexual violence, 30% of completed investigations Rate per y Males comprised 90% of victims Number 1,000 inmates and perpetrators of inmate-on-inmate National estimate 2,090 0.94 nonconsensual sexual acts in prison Total reported 1,213 0.69 and jail. Prisons - Federal Prisons - State Local jails Private prisons/jails State juvenile systems Local/private juvenile facilities Other facilities 47 611 210 17 0.31 0.52 0.63 0.55 212 5.15 108 8 4.97 0.82 y In State prisons 69% of victims of staff sexual misconduct were male, while 67% of perpetrators were female. y In local jails 70% of victims of staff sexual misconduct were female; 65% of perpetrators, male. facilities. The methods will rely on selfadministered surveys to provide anonymity to victims when reporting their experiences. At the same time, Between January 1 and June 15, 2005, computer-assisted technologies will BJS completed the first national survey Administrative records alone cannot ensure uniform conditions under which provide reliable estimates of sexual of the incidence and prevalence of inmates complete the survey, and sexual violence in correctional facilities. violence. Due to fear of reprisal from sampling techniques and supplemental perpetrators, a code of silence among The Governments Division of the U.S. Census Bureau was the data collection inmates, personal embarrassment, and data collections will reduce potential biases. (See box below for an update lack of trust in staff, victims are often agent for the survey. The survey was of these activities.) reluctant to report incidents to correcconducted to provide information on tional authorities. At present there are occurrences of sexual violence based The 2004 administrative survey no reliable estimates of the extent of on allegations brought to the attention of correctional authorities. Although the unreported sexual victimization among provides the basis for the annual statistical review, as required under the act. results are limited to incidents reported prison and jail inmates and youth held Though limited to basic counts, these in residential facilities. to officials and officially recorded survey data will be used by the Review during 2004, the survey provides an BJS is developing and testing methods Panel on Prison Rape within the understanding of what officials know, for more fully measuring the incidence Department of Justice for purposes of how many allegations were reported, conducting public hearings concerning of sexual violence in correctional how many were substantiated, basic BJS conducts the first annual administrative records collection National implementation of victim self reports to begin in 2006 BJS works toward full implementation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act. Since January 2004 BJS has entered into cooperative agreements with – 1. RTI International (Raleigh, NC) to develop and test the adult prison and jail collection methodologies 2. Westat, Inc. (Rockville, MD) to develop and test methodologies for measuring sexual violence in State and local juvenile facilities 3. National Opinion Research Center (NORC) (Chicago, IL) to develop and test methods of collecting data from soon-to-be released and former prisoners. characteristics of victims and perpetrators, and sanctions imposed on perpetrators. As of June 30, 2005, the following work had been completed or was underway: Prison and jail inmates y An ACASI questionnaire for adult inmates had been developed and reviewed by over 40 prison and jail administrators, prisoner rights advocates, and researchers. y Paper-and-pencil interview (PAPI) forms were under development, including forms translated into the five most frequent foreign languages (in addition to Spanish) spoken by inmates; forms for inmates considered too dangerous for interaction with survey staff; and forms to gather administrative data on all inmates. Though underlying survey methodology and logistical procedures differ y Survey materials and methods had with each of the data collection efforts, been submitted to the Office and the measurement strategies will be Management and Budget (OMB) consistent. The surveys will consist of and to an Institutional Review Board an Audio Computer-Assisted Self(IRB) for approval to conduct tests. Interview (ACASI) in which respony Procedures for selection of prison dents interact with a computerand jail facilities and for sampling administered questionnaire using a inmates within selected facilities touch-screen and follow audio instruchad been developed. tions delivered via headphones. The use of ACASI is expected to overy A formal pretest in 10 State prisons, come many limitations of previous 5 Federal prisons, and 10 local jails research. (See Data Collections for is planned for October 2005. the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003, June 2004, NCJ 206109.) 2 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Youth in residential placement facilities y A draft ACASI questionnaire for juveniles had been developed and will be reviewed in a national workshop of stakeholders in September 2005. y Survey procedures and draft questionnaires have been submitted to an IRB for approval to begin conducting cognitive testing. y A formal pretest of collection methods in up to 20 juvenile facilities is planned for November 2005. Former and soon-to-be-released prisoners y An ACASI questionnaire and administrative records form were being developed to survey former inmates under active parole or postcustody supervision. y Activities were expanded to include the development of methods to survey soon-to-be-released prisoners in community-based facilities. y Cognitive testing is planned for September 2005. National implementation of data collections is scheduled to begin with a 10% sample of prisons and jails in June 2006, and a sample of juvenile facilities in December 2006. Survey covers more than 2,700 adult a representative sample was drawn of local jails, jails in Indian country, faciliand juvenile correctional facilities ties operated by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement The 2004 survey included all Federal (ICE), privately operated adult prisons and State prison systems, Stateand jails, and privately or locally operated juvenile facilities, and facilioperated juvenile facilities. Altogether, ties in the United States operated by the administrative survey covered the U.S. military (table 1). In addition, 2,730 of the 8,663 facilities specified by the act. These facilities housed more How sexual violence was measured than 1.7 million inmates, or 79% of all adults and juveniles held at midyear The definition of “rape” as required under the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2004. 2003 was operationalized by disaggregating sexual violence into two categories of inmate-on-inmate sexual acts and two categories of staff sexual The survey was based on 11 separate misconduct. The inmate-on-inmate categories reflected uniform definitions samples corresponding to the different formulated by the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, in types of facilities covered under the “Sexual Violence Surveillance: Uniform Definitions and Recommended Data act. (See Methodology, page 10.) Each Elements,” Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The categories were – sample was designed in accordance with the requirement that BJS draw a Nonconsensual sexual acts random sample, or other scientifically Contact of any person without his or her consent, or of a person who is unable appropriate sample, of not less than to consent or refuse; and 10% of facilities. Entire systems were • Contact between the penis and the vagina or the penis and the anus selected, when possible, to maximize including penetration, however slight; or reporting coverage. Local and private • Contact between the mouth and the penis, vagina, or anus; or facilities were sampled to insure at • Penetration of the anal or genital opening of another person by a hand, least one in each State and with selecfinger, or other object. tion probabilities proportionate to the number of adults or juveniles held at Abusive sexual contacts the time of the last facility census. Contact of any person without his or her consent, or of a person who is unable to consent or refuse; and Table 1. Facilities selected for the • Intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, Survey of Sexual Violence, 2004 anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person. Number Selected the operation of correctional facilities with the highest and lowest incidence of sexual violence. The number of allegations and substantiated incidents for each system and sampled facility in the survey is provided. (See Appendix tables.) Definitions of staff sexual misconduct and staff sexual harassment were based on “Training for Investigators of Staff Sexual Misconduct,” prepared by the National Institute of Corrections. Staff sexual misconduct Any behavior or act of a sexual nature directed toward an inmate by an employee, volunteer, official visitor, or agency representative. Romantic relationships between staff and inmates are included. Consensual or nonconsensual sexual acts include: • Intentional touching of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks with the intent to abuse, arouse, or gratify sexual desire; or • Completed, attempted, threatened, or requested sexual acts; or • Occurrences of indecent exposure, invasion of privacy, or staff voyeurism for sexual gratification. Staff sexual harassment Repeated verbal statements or comments of a sexual nature to an inmate by employee, volunteer, official visitor, or agency representative, including: • Demeaning references to gender or derogatory comments about body or clothing; or • Profane or obscene language or gestures. Facility type Total Prisons Public - Federal Public - State Private Local jails Public Private Juvenile facilities Public - State Public - Local Private Other facilities Indian country jails Military-operated ICE-operatedb of facilities 8,663 in 2004 survey 2,730 84 1,320 264 Alla Alla 27 3,318 47 404 5 510 685 2,275 Alla 69 228 70 59 31 10 Alla 14 a The 2004 survey included all State prison and juvenile systems, all Federal facilities, and all facilities operated by the U.S. military. b Includes facilities operated by or exclusively for the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 3 not report any data. Jail authorities had Two-thirds or more of systems and facilities able to fully report the most similar reporting capabilities, with 88% using the survey definitions. serious forms of sexual violence After consulting with experts in sexual victimization, prison rape researchers, and corrections administrators, BJS developed uniform definitions of sexual violence. (See box on page 3.) Incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence were classified as nonconsensual sexual acts and abusive sexual contacts. Incidents of staff-on-inmate sexual violence were separated into staff sexual misconduct and staff sexual harassment. Incidents varied in seriousness, ranging from the least serious, harassment, to the most serious, rape. For purposes of this report, all such incidents are considered sexual violence. The most serious forms of sexual violence (inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts and staff sexual misconduct) were the most widely reported using survey definitions and reporting rules (table 2). Correctional authorities in two-thirds of prison systems and more than threequarters of sampled jails were able to report incidents of nonconsensual acts as defined in the survey. Fewer were able to report data fully on abusive sexual contacts, with 25% of prison systems and 14% of jails including the lesser forms of sexual violence among counts of nonconsensual sexual acts. Compared to prison and jail authorities, juvenile authorities had a greater capacity to adopt the survey’s uniform definitions and reporting rules for youth-on-youth sexual violence. More than 80% of authorities responsible for local and privately operated juvenile facilities were able to report data using the categories provided. Most prison administrators (35) were able to report data on staff sexual misconduct using survey definitions; 9 were unable to separate sexual harassment from misconduct; 3 could report data on some but not all of the occurrences during the year; 4 could 4 Fewer prison administrators were able to report comparable data on staff sexual harassment. Among prison administrators, 9 were unable to separate harassment from other forms of staff sexual misconduct, and 13 did not have any data on staff sexual harassment. Variations in the reporting capacities of State juvenile systems and local or private juvenile facilities were similar. Some administrators of State systems were unable to separate staff sexual misconduct from sexual harassment (6) or unable to report any data on sexual harassment (4). Operators of local and private juvenile facilities, which typically house small numbers of youth, had the greatest capacity to report data using survey definitions. Nearly 90% of these facilities reported data on staff misconduct and harassment. Caution needed when interpreting the 2004 survey results In completing the 2004 survey, correctional administrators frequently expressed concern about the absence of uniform definitions and differential reporting capabilities. Many indicated a commitment to improving their offender-based information systems and grievance tracking systems to conform to future survey requirements. During 2005 BJS expects to work with administrators to improve reporting, especially those with systems too large for manual searches of paper files. The absence of uniform reporting and tracking procedures necessitates caution when interpreting the 2004 survey results. The data should not be used to rank systems or facilities. Higher or lower counts may reflect variations in definitions, reporting capacities, and procedures for recording allegations and not differences in the underlying incidence of sexual violence. Table 2. Reporting capabilities of adult and juvenile correctional authorities to provide data on sexual violence, 2004 Type of sexual violence Total Federal and State prison systems Local jails State Local/private juvenile juvenile systemsa facilities 51 404 50 270 Nonconsensual sexual acts Full reporting Partialb Includes abusive sexual contacts Unable to report 34 4 13 0 315 30 55 4 37 2 10 1 221 13 30 6 Abusive sexual contacts Full reporting Partialb Combined with other sexual acts Unable to report 26 3 13 9 343 0 55 6 38 0 10 2 230 2 30 8 Staff sexual misconduct Full reporting Partialb Includes sexual harassment Unable to report 35 3 9 4 357 10 32 5 40 4 6 0 240 12 14 4 Staff sexual harassment Full reporting Partialb Combined with staff sexual misconduct Unable to report 27 2 9 13 365 0 32 7 37 3 6 4 252 0 14 4 a Includes the District of Columbia and all States, except Arkansas which did not operate any juvenile facilities. b See Appendix tables for systems and facilities that reported for only part of the year, some but not all facilities, or only incidents that were completed or substantiated. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Number of allegations of sexual violence during 2004 Reported National in survey estimatea 5,528 8,210 More than 5,500 allegations of sexual violence reported in survey All selected correctional systems and facilities responded except four: y Navajo Department of Corrections, Window Rock, AZ y Colorado Boys Ranch, La Junta, CO y Home Youth Family Program, Wittenberg, WI y Residential Treatment Center, Yonkers, NY Reports of sexual violence varied across systems and sampled facilities, with every State prison system except New Hampshire reporting at least one allegation of sexual violence. Among the 404 sampled local jails, 166 (41%) reported an allegation. Among Stateoperated juvenile systems, 46 reported at least one allegation. (Iowa, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming were the exceptions.) About a third of sampled local and privately operated juvenile facilities (96) reported at least one allegation. Combined, the 2004 survey recorded 5,528 allegations of sexual violence. Taking into account weights for sampled facilities, the estimated total number of allegations for the Nation was 8,210. Prison systems reported 42% of all allegations; local or private juvenile facilities, 23%; local jails, 21%; and State juvenile systems, 11%. Total Prison systems Local jails Private prisons and jails State juvenile systems Local/private juvenile facilities Other facilitiesb 3,456 699 67 931 3,456 1,700 210 931 359 16 1,890 20 Juvenile facilities reported the highest rates of alleged sexual violence State-operated juvenile facilities, often required by law to record all allegations and report them to State and local law enforcement authorities and child protective services, had the highest rates of alleged staff sexual misconduct (11.34 allegations per 1,000 youth). Local and privately operated juvenile facilities reported 3.22 allegations of staff sexual misconduct per 1,000 youth, nearly 3 times the rate in State prison systems (1.12 per 1,000 inmates) and Federal prisons (1.33). a Among sampled facilities, totals were estimated based on the reported number of allegations times the inverse of the probability of selection, and then summed. b Includes jails in Indian country and facilities operated by ICE and the U.S. military. Nearly 42% of the reported allegations of sexual violence involved staff sexual misconduct, 37% involved inmate-oninmate nonconsensual sexual acts; 11% staff sexual harassment; and 10% inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contact. Because many States have laws specifying that all sexual acts involving youth below certain ages are nonconsensual, rates of alleged nonconsensual sexual acts were high in juvenile correctional facilities. In 2004 there were an estimated 7.31 allegations of youth-onyouth nonconsensual sexual acts per 1,000 youth in local or private juvenile facilities and 6.75 allegations per 1,000 in State juvenile facilities. These rates were more than 6 times the inmate-oninmate rate in State prison systems (1.05 per 1,000) and nearly 7 times the rate in local jails (.97 per 1,000). Only jails in Indian country had a higher rate (10.48); but, due to the small number of reported allegations, the rate is unstable. (See Methodology, page 10.) Expressed in terms of rates, there were 3.15 allegations of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates held in 2004 (table 3). Rates of staff sexual misconduct were the highest with 1.31 allegations per 1,000 inmates, followed by inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts, (1.16 allegations per 1,000). Rates of alleged abusive sexual contacts (0.33) and staff sexual harassment (0.36) were the lowest. Table 3. Allegations of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates, by type of facility, 2004 Type of facility Total Inmate-on-inmate sexual violence Number of Nonconsensual sexual acts Abusive sexual contacts Staff sexual misconduct Staff sexual harassment inmates Number of Rate per Number of Rate per Number of Rate per Number of Rate per covered allegations 1,000 inmates allegations 1,000 inmates allegations 1,000 inmates allegations 1,000 inmates 1,754,092 2,027 1.16 579 0.33 2,298 1.31 624 0.36 151,650 1,166,966 27,682 17 1,229 12 0.11 1.05 0.43 66 221 14 0.44 0.19 0.51 201 1,305 26 1.33 1.12 0.94 -417 14 / 0.36 0.51 331,768 3,386 322 0 0.97 / 65 0 0.20 / 225 1 0.68 0.30 87 0 0.26 / Juvenile facilities State-operated Local or private 41,196 21,739 278 159 6.75 7.31 131 82 3.18 3.77 467 70 11.34 3.22 55 48 1.34 2.21 Other facilities Indian country jails Military-operated ICE-operated 477 2,355 6,873 5 3 2 10.48 1.27 0.29 0 0 0 / / / 0 2 1 / 0.85 0.15 0 0 3 / / 0.44 Prisons Public - Federal Public - State Private Local jails Public Private - - Not reported. / Not calculated. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 5 External authorities often involved in investigating allegations Allegations involving youth in State, local or private facilities are typically investigated by external authorities, such as the State police, sheriff’s department/local police, office of inspector general, division of social services, child protective services, and other agencies serving youth. Nearly 80% of local/private juvenile agencies and 64% of State juvenile systems indicated that external authorities had sole or shared responsibility for investigating allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence (table 4). In contrast, in 21 of the 51 prison systems (41%) and 195 of 404 sampled jails (48%) external authorities had a responsibility for investigating allegations of inmate-oninmate sexual violence. Table 4. Responsibility for investigating allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts and staff sexual misconduct, by type of facility, 2004 State juvenile Local or private juvenile facilitiesb systemsa State and Federal prisons Pi 51 Local jails 404 50 270 Nonconsensual sexual acts Internal Shared with external authority External authorities only Not reported 29 13 8 1 203 82 113 6 18 10 22 0 56 31 182 1 Staff sexual misconduct Internal Shared with external authority External authorities only Not reported 22 18 11 0 166 95 127 16 14 18 18 0 69 45 156 0 Total a b Table 5. Allegations of sexual violence in State prisons, local jails, and private prisons and jails, 2004 Inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Staff sexual misconductb Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Staff sexual harassment Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing Local jails Number Percenta Private prisons and jails Number Percenta 1,229 152 392 322 355 100% 17.6 45.3 37.2 322 73 117 78 41 100% 27.2 43.7 29.1 12 0 8 4 0 100% 0.0 66.7 33.3 221 57 126 22 16 100% 27.8 61.5 10.7 65 22 31 9 3 100% 35.5 50.0 14.5 14 2 0 3 0 100% 40.0 0.0 60.0 1,305 321 588 166 230 100% 29.9 54.7 15.4 225 81 42 52 38 100% 46.3 24.0 29.7 27 13 6 6 2 100% 52.0 24.0 24.0 417 81 218 58 60 100% 22.7 61.1 16.2 87 34 22 14 12 100% 48.6 31.4 20.0 14 2 10 2 0 100% 14.3 71.4 14.3 Note: Comparable data for inmate-on-inmate sexual violence in the Federal Bureau of Prisons were not available. a Percents based on allegations for which investigations had been completed. b The Federal Bureau of Prisons reported 201 allegations of staff sexual misconduct and sexual harassment: 11 were substantiated; 96 unsubstantiated; 11 unfounded; 77 investigation ongoing; and 6 disposed of administratively. 6 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 In State prisons fewer than 20% of allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts were substantiated Allegations reported in 2004 were classified as: y substantiated, if they were determined to have occurred y unsubstantiated, if the evidence was insufficient to make a final determination that they occurred y unfounded, if they were determined not to have occurred y investigation ongoing, if a final determination had not been made at time of data collection. Includes the District of Columbia and all States, except Arkansas. Excludes 20 sampled facilities that were out-scope (not covered under the act). State prisons Number Percenta Responsibility for investigating allegations of staff sexual misconduct was left to the prison authorities in 22 systems (43%), jail authorities in 166 local jails (41%), State juvenile authorities in 14 State systems (28%), and local/private juvenile authorities in 69 facilities (26%). In other systems and facilities, allegations were either referred to external authorities or were jointly investigated. Overall, inmate-on-inmate allegations of sexual violence were less likely to be substantiated than allegations of staff sexual misconduct. Based on allegations in State prisons for which investigations had been completed, 18% of nonconsensual sexual acts were substantiated, compared to 30% of allegations of staff sexual misconduct (table 5). In jails 27% of completed investigations of nonconsensual sexual acts were substantiated, compared to 46% of the allegations of staff sexual misconduct. The most common outcome of investigations of sexual violence was a determination of lack of evidence. Nearly 55% of allegations of staff sexual misconduct in prison and 45% of allegations of inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts were unsubstantiated. More than a third (37%) of completed investigations of nonconsensual sexual acts in State prison and 29% in local jails were determined to be unfounded. In juvenile facilities a third of the alleged nonconsensual sexual acts were substantiated Based on allegations in State-operated juvenile facilities for which investigations had been completed, 33% of youth-on-youth nonconsensual sexual acts were substantiated, compared to 15% of allegations of staff sexual misconduct (table 6). In local or private juvenile facilities, 33% of completed investigations of nonconsensual sexual acts were substantiated, compared to 17% of the allegations of staff sexual misconduct. About half of all allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts were determined to be unsubstantiated: 53% in State juvenile facilities; 49% in local/private facilities. More than a third of alleged incidents of staff sexual misconduct in State juvenile facilities were determined to be unfounded (39%); nearly 30% in local/private facilities. State juvenile authorities reported 212 substantiated incidents of sexual violence, 24% of allegations for which investigations had been completed. Local and private juvenile authorities reported 108 substantiated incidents, 31% of completed investigations. State prison officials reported 611 substantiated incidents (24%); and jail administrators 210 (35% of completed investigations). Federal prison authorities, reporting data only for staff sexual misconduct and harassment, indicated that 11 of the allegations had been substantiated and another 6 disposed of administratively through termination or resignation. As a percentage of completed investigations, 14% of allegations were substantiated or administratively resolved. Table 6. Allegations of sexual violence in State juvenile systems and local or private juvenile facilities, 2004 State-operated juvenile facilities Number Percent* Local or private juvenile facilities Number Percent* Youth-on-youth nonconsensual sexual acts Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing 278 85 137 38 13 100% 32.7 52.7 14.6 159 49 72 26 4 100% 33.3 49.0 17.7 Youth-on-youth abusive sexual contacts Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing 131 42 49 13 3 100% 40.4 47.1 12.5 82 42 34 6 1 100% 51.2 41.5 7.3 Staff sexual misconduct Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing 467 69 204 175 20 100% 15.4 45.5 39.1 70 11 34 19 6 100% 17.2 53.1 29.7 Staff sexual harassment Substantiated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Investigation ongoing 55 16 27 9 3 100% 30.8 51.9 17.3 48 6 17 23 2 100% 13.0 37.0 50.0 *Percents based on allegations for which investigations had been completed. Substantiated incidents of sexual violence, 2004 Rate per Number 1,000 inmates During 2004 correctional authorities substantiated nearly 2,100 incidents of sexual violence The survey of administrative records recorded 1,213 substantiated incidents of sexual violence. Taking into account sampling of local jails, private prisons or jails, and local/private juvenile facilities, the estimated total for the Nation was 2,090. Relative to the number of inmates, there were 0.94 substantiated incidents of sexual violence per 1,000 inmates reported in 2004. The rates of substantiated incidents of sexual violence were highest in juvenile facilities. State juvenile administrators reported 5.15 substantiated incidents per 1,000 youth; local and private administrators reported 4.97 per 1,000 youth. These victimization rates were nearly 10 times those reported in State prisons (0.52 substantiated incidents per 1,000 inmates) and 8 times those in local jails (0.63 per 1,000 inmates). National estimate 2,090 0.94 Total reported 1,213 0.69 47 611 210 17 0.31 0.52 0.63 0.55 212 5.15 108 8 4.97 0.82 Prisons - Federal* Prisons - State Local jails Private prisons/jails State-operated juvenile facilities Local or private juvenile facilities Other facilities *Includes 36 guilty findings of abusive sexual contacts involving cases spanning more than 1 calendar year. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 7 Males comprised 90% of victims and Approximately, 90% of reported victims of inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual perpetrators of nonconsensual sexual acts in State prison were male; sexual acts in prison and jail 87% of the reported victims in local Characteristics of victims and perpetra- jails (table 7). tors of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence generally reflected the overall Among victims of abusive sexual composition of the adult inmate popula- contacts, women were over represented compared with the general tion. At midyear 2004 males repreinmate population. Females comprised sented 93% of State prisoners and 88% of local inmates. (See Prison and 46% of victims of abusive sexual contacts in State prison, and 28% of Jail Inmates at Midyear 2004, April the victims in local jails. 2005, NCJ 208801.) Table 7. Characteristics of victims and perpetrators in substantiated incidents of sexual violence in adult correctional facilities, by type, 2004 Type of incident Number of substantiated incidents Victims Male Female Perpetrators Male Female Total 838 567 342 558 341 Nonconsensual sexual acts State prisons Local jails Private jails and prisons 152 73 0 133 66 0 15 10 0 145 70 0 14 5 0 Abusive sexual contacts State prisons Local jails Private jails and prisons 57 22 2 37 28 2 32 11 0 49 31 2 17 7 0 Staff sexual misconduct State prisons Local jails Private jails and prisons 321 81 13 188 41 5 86 96 7 82 73 6 165 40 7 Staff sexual harassment State prisons Local jails Private jails and prisons 81 34 2 52 15 0 39 45 1 53 45 2 50 34 2 Note: Details on victims and perpetrators were not provided for all substantiated incidents. Table 8. Characteristics of victims and perpetrators in substantiated incidents of sexual violence in juvenile correctional facilities, by type, 2004 Type of incident Total Number of substantiated incidents Victims Male Female Perpetrators Male Female 320 302 161 256 141 Nonconsensual sexual acts State-operated Local or private facilities 85 49 77 46 16 18 64 34 17 8 Abusive sexual contacts State-operated Local or private facilities 42 42 32 29 42 19 33 30 44 10 Staff sexual misconduct State-operated Local or private facilities 69 11 80 17 36 10 55 14 49 8 Staff sexual harassment State-operated Local or private facilities 16 6 17 4 11 9 20 6 4 1 Note: Details on victims and perpetrators were not provided for all substantiated incidents. 8 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Juvenile authorities reported that girls comprised 17% of the victims of youthon-youth nonconsensual sexual acts in State-operated facilities, 28% of the victims in local/private facilities (table 8). Compared to their percentages among youth held in juvenile facilities nationwide, girls were over-represented among victims. In the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, conducted by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention in 2001, girls accounted for 11% of the youth in State facilities and 17% of the youth in local and private facilities. Female staff implicated in staff sexual misconduct in prisons; male staff in local jails Characteristics of victims and perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct differed among correctional systems and facilities: y In State prisons 69% of victims of staff sexual misconduct were male, while 67% of perpetrators were female. y In local jails 70% of victims were female; 65% of perpetrators, male. y In State-operated juvenile facilities, 69% of victims were male; 47% of perpetrators, female. y In local/privately operated juvenile facilities, 63% of the victims and 64% of the perpetrators were male. Perpetrators of staff sexual harassment, involving incidents of demeaning references to gender, derogatory comments about an inmate’s body, or use of obscene language, were divided between male (58%) and female (42%) staff. Overall, correctional authorities reported data on 716 perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct or staff sexual harassment. Of these perpetrators, 50% were female staff. Table 9. Sanctions imposed on perpetrators of inmate-on-inmate and youth-on-youth sexual violence, by type of correctional facility, 2004 Sanction Total State prison systems Number Percent Local jails Number Percent State-operated juvenile systems Number Percent Local or private juvenile facilities Number Percent 36 100% 42 100% 27 100% 40 100% Legal sanction Arrested Referred for prosecution Given new sentence 31 11 30 9 86% 31 83 25 32 10 29 6 76% 24 69 14 19 8 19 6 70% 30 70 22 20 10 16 1 50% 25 40 3 Change in custody Solitary confinement or segregation Higher custody within same facility Transferred to another facility 32 30 14 26 89% 83 39 72 31 30 23 5 74% 71 55 12 19 16 11 12 70% 59 41 44 26 10 12 13 65% 25 30 33 Internal discipline Confinement to own cell or quarters Loss of good time/increase in "bad" time Given extra work Loss of privileges 27 11 21 3 20 75% 31 58 8 56 25 15 4 0 20 60% 36 10 0 48 21 15 12 2 20 78% 56 44 7 74 29 12 9 2 25 73% 30 23 5 63 Note: Data based on correctional systems and facilities that reported one or more substantiated nonconsensual sexual act or abusive sexual contact involving inmates or youth. *Detail sums to more than total, since systems or facilities may impose more than one sanction on perpetrators. Most prisons and jails imposed legal sanctions on perpetrators of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence To better understand how correctional authorities respond to incidents of sexual violence, the survey included questions on sanctions imposed on perpetrators. Authorities who had reported at least one substantiated inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual act or abusive sexual contact were asked to report all of the sanctions that had been imposed. A legal sanction, including arrest, referral for prosecution, or new sentence, was imposed on perpetrators in – y 86% of the 36 prison systems reporting a substantiated incident y 76% of the 42 jail facilities y 70% of the 27 State-operate juvenile systems y 50% of the 40 local/private juvenile facilities (table 9). A change in custody was also a frequently reported sanction. Authorities in 89% of State prison systems and 74% of local jails with a substantiated incident reported that perpetrators were moved to solitary confinement, changed to a higher custody level, or transferred to another facility as a result of sexual violence. A change in custody was imposed on perpetrators in 65% of the local/private juvenile facilities and 70% of State-operated juvenile systems. authorities indicated that 55% of the staff had been discharged, 36% referred for prosecution, and 9% disciplined but not discharged. An additional but unknown number of staff had resigned before investigations had been completed. In addition, authorities with substantiated incidents during 2004 reported use of other sanctions, including State adult and juvenile systems reported the largest numbers of staff referred for prosecution. In State prisons, 117 staff in substantiated incidents of sexual misconduct had been referred for prosecution (39%); in State-operated juvenile systems 44 staff (41%). In local jails staff involved in incidents of sexual misconduct were less likely to have been referred for prosecution (18%). y loss of good time in 58% of State prison systems and 44% of Stateoperated juvenile systems y loss of privileges in 56% of State prisons, 48% of local jails, 74% of State juvenile systems; and 63% of local/private juvenile facilities y confinement to cell or quarters in 56% of State juvenile systems and 30% of local/private juvenile facilities. 90% of perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct discharged or referred for prosecution The survey collected data on 539 staff implicated in 508 substantiated incidents of staff sexual misconduct during 2004 (table 10). Correctional The most common sanction imposed on staff involved in sexual harassment of inmates was discipline but not discharge or prosecution. During 2004, 129 staff were implicated in the 140 reported incidents of staff sexual harassment. Of these staff, 60% were disciplined; 36% discharged; and 4 referred for prosecution. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 9 Table 10. Sanctions imposed on perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct and staff sexual harassment, by type of correctional facility, 2004 Substantiated incidents Staff sexual misconduct Staff Staff Referred for discharged disciplined prosecution Substantiated incidents Staff sexual harassment Staff Staff Referred for discharged disciplined prosecution Total 508 296 50 193 140 47 78 4 Prisons Public - Federal* Public - State Private 11 321 12 0 160 11 1 23 0 4 117 5 -81 2 -25 0 -43 2 -1 0 Local jails Public Private 81 1 59 1 17 0 17 1 34 0 8 0 22 0 1 0 Juvenile facilities State-operated Local or private 69 11 55 10 8 0 44 4 16 6 12 1 7 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other facilities Indian country jails Military-operated ICE-operated -- Not reported. *Excludes 10 resignations of Federal prison staff. Methodology The following samples were drawn: Between January 1 and June 15, 2005, BJS, with the Governments Division of the U.S. Census Bureau as its collection agent, conducted the 2004 Survey of Sexual Violence. The survey was the first-ever survey of correctional systems and facilities, designed to measure the number of reported incidents of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence and staff-on-inmate sexual misconduct. Based on administrative records, the 2004 survey was designed to provide an understanding of what corrections officials know, what information is recorded, how allegations and substantiated incidents are handled, where incidents occur and how officials respond to allegations brought to their attention. It was not designed to rank systems or facilities. 1. The survey included all 50 State adult prison systems and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Prison administrators were directed to report only on incidents of sexual violence that occurred within publicly operated adult facilities. Sampling design The survey was based on 11 separate samples, corresponding to the different facilities covered under the act. Each sample was designed in accordance with the requirement that BJS draw a random sample, or other scientifically appropriate sample, of not less than 10 percent of all Federal, State, and county prisons, and a representative sample of municipal prisons. 10 2. A sample of 27 privately operated prison facilities was drawn to represent a 10% sample of the 264 private prisons identified in the 2000 Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities. Facilities were sorted by region and average daily population and then sampled with probabilities proportionate to size. Each sampled facility was then weighted to provide a national sum reflecting the total average daily population of inmates held in private prisons in the 12-month period ending June 30, 2000. Jurisdictions were sorted into 6 strata, based on size, and then sampled systematically, to provide a representative national sample. A total of 77 jurisdictions were sampled with certainty (corresponding to the largest jurisdiction in each State plus 31 jurisdictions selected due to their large size). An additional 327 jurisdictions were selected from 4 strata, with probabilities of selection proportionate to size. Jail administrators were directed to report on all publicly operated facilities within their jurisdiction. Each facility was then weighted to provide a national estimate for inmates held in local jails. 4. A sample of 5 privately operated jails was also elected based on the data reported in the 2003 Deaths in Custody collection. Facilities were sorted by region and size. The measure of size was the number of inmates held on December 31, 2002, plus the number of new admissions in 2003. Facilities 3. Publicly operated jail facilities were selected based on data reported in the were selected systematically using a random start and a fixed sampling 2003 Deaths in Custody collection. This collection provided the most up-to- interval. Each facility was then date measure of jurisdiction size corre- weighted to provide a total sum of inmates corresponding to the number sponding to the total number of of inmates at risk to sexual violence in inmates held on December 31, 2002, private jails in 2003. plus the number admitted in 2003. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 5. The survey included all Stateoperated juvenile correctional facilities in 49 States and the District of Columbia. (Arkansas was the only State that did not operate a juvenile facility.) Based on the 2003 Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP), States operated a total of 510 juvenile correctional facilities. 6. A separate sample was drawn from the 685 locally operated juvenile facilities identified in the 2003 Census. In meeting the requirement under the act to select a 10% sample, with at least one facility in each State, the largest locally-operated facility in each State was selected (37). An additional 32 facilities were then sampled from among the remaining facilities. Facilities were first sorted by region and facility type (commitment and non-commitment) and then ordered by size (the number of youth with assigned beds on the day of the Census). Facilities were then selected with probabilities proportionate to size. 7. A separate sample was drawn from the 2,275 privately operated juvenile facilities also identified in the 2003 Census. At total of 57 facilities were selected with certainty, corresponding to the largest facility in each State (51), and 6 other large facilities. An additional 171 facilities were selected from the remaining 2,218 facilities by forming 8 strata (based on region and facility type). Within each stratum, facilities were sorted by size (total youth with assigned beds) and then sampled with probabilities proportionate to size. 8. Three additional samples of other correctional facilities were drawn to represent a) jails in Indian country (10 selected from a total 70 based on probabilities proportionate to size); b) military-operated facilities (all of the 59 facilities operated the Armed Services in the continental U.S.); and c) 14 facilities operated by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (excluding contract facilities holding inmates exclusively for ICE). The Bureau of Justice Statistics is the statistical agency of the U.S. Department of Justice. Lawrence A. Greenfeld is director. Allen J. Beck and Timothy A. Hughes wrote this report. Paige M. Harrison provided statistical assistance. Lauren E. Glaze and Thomas P. Bonczar verified the report, and Tom Hester edited it. Timothy A. Hughes and Paige M. Harrison, under the supervision of Allen J. Beck, designed the survey, developed the questionnaires, and monitored data collection and data processing. Pamela H. Butler, Lisa A. McNelis, Greta B. Clark, and Monica R. Hill, carried out data collection and processing, under the supervision of Charlene M. Sebold, Governments Division, Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. Arthur W. Ciampa, Regina M. Yates, Patricia D. Torreyson, and Pearl E. Chase assisted in data collection. Suzanne M. Dorinski drew the facility samples and provided sampling weights. June 2005 NCJ 210333 Office of Justice Programs Partnerships for Safer Communities http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov Comparing systems and facilities Data for each correctional system and sampled facility are displayed in the Appendix tables. (See pages 13 to 39.) In each table a measure of population size has been provided as a basis of comparison. These measures include: y Custody population on June 30, 2004, for State and Federal prison systems (the most recent counts from the National Prisoners Statistics data series); y Average daily population during 2004, for local jails, private jails and prisons, and other adult correctional facilities (collected specially for the survey); y Number of youth held on December 31, 2004, for State juvenile systems and local or private juvenile facilities (collected specially for the survey). These population counts still mask underlying differences in systems and facilities related to the total number of inmates or youth who were at risk to sexual victimization during 2004. Such differences result from variations in length of stay, and further complicate drawing reliable comparisons of systems and facilities. The 2004 survey results should not be used to rank systems or facilities. This report in portable document format and in ASCII, its tables, and related statistical data are available at the BJS World Wide Web Internet site: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/ The 2004 Survey of Sexual Violence comprised six separate questionnaires corresponding to types of correctional systems and facilities. Copies of the questionnaires in Portable Document Format (pdf) are available on the BJS website. Click on Publications. Variations in the number of allegations and substantiated incidents may reflect differences in definitions and reporting criteria, as well as variations in procedures for recording allegations and in the thoroughness of subsequent investigations. Nevertheless, the 2004 survey provides an understanding of what officials know and how they respond to incidents brought to their attention. Future data collections, based on victim reports of sexual violence in surveys of current and former inmates, are being developed to permit reliable comparisons that overcome the limitations of administrative records. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 11 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics *NCJ 210333* Washington, DC 20531 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 Keeping current on criminal justice issues For the most recent list of BJS reports or ordering instructions for printed copies, visit http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs. Download BJS reports at no cost. To register for the free National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) bimonthly catalog by mail, please call 1-800-851-3420. The specialist will send you a registration packet. JUSTSTATS Get e-mail notification of the latest statistical releases from BJS, the FBI, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention through JUSTSTATS. To learn how to subscribe, see http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/juststats.htm JUSTINFO For a biweekly electronic newsletter about all the publications, funding opportunities, and other announcements for the Office of Justice Programs, subscribe to JUSTINFO. To learn how to subscribe, see http://virlib.ncjrs.org/JUSTINFO.asp PRESORTED STANDARD POSTAGE & FEES PAID DOJ/BJS Permit No. G-91 Appendix table 1a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by State or Federal prison authorities, by type, 2004 Prisoners in custody, 6/30/2004a Total Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded 1,318,616 1,246 152 392 322 287 93 126 22 151,650 1,166,966 17 1,229 0 152 -392 -322 66 221 36 57 -126 -22 Alabamac Alaska Arizona Arkansas Californiac,d 24,768 3,158 26,833 12,655 160,703 6 0 18 4 23 2 0 4 1 23 2 0 12 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 -0 1 4 -- -0 0 0 -- -0 1 1 -- -0 0 3 -- Coloradoe Connecticut Delaware Floridac Georgiag 16,609 18,814 6,778 77,647 44,026 5 6 3 75 51 3 0 0 2 0 1 5 2 56 16 1 0 1 4 4 -0 2 --- -0 0 --- -0 2 --- -0 0 --- Hawaii Idahof,g Illinois Indianac Iowaf 3,877 4,621 44,379 21,236 8,611 6 3 17 18 4 0 3 1 0 4 6 -12 16 -- 0 -2 1 -- 0 -3 -10 0 -0 -10 0 -2 --- 0 -1 --- Kansas Kentucky Louisianah Maine Marylandc 9,181 10,814 16,672 1,986 23,622 21 7 1 0 3 2 2 0 0 1 8 4 0 0 2 11 1 1 0 0 12 3 1 0 -- 6 0 0 0 -- 5 2 1 0 -- 1 1 0 0 -- Massachusetts Michiganc,i Minnesota Mississippi Missouri 10,043 48,111 7,827 11,456 30,139 12 39 13 3 17 2 17 4 0 3 5 22 6 0 11 5 0 2 2 2 23 -1 0 15 7 -0 0 1 11 -1 0 11 5 -0 0 0 Montanag Nebraska Nevadac New Hampshire New Jerseyc 2,074 4,053 10,152 2,426 23,752 2 12 15 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 11 2 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 -0 -0 -- -0 -0 -- -0 -0 -- -0 -0 -- New Mexicoe,i New York North Carolinac North Dakota Ohio 3,703 64,778 35,219 1,176 42,231 4 15 15 0 86 1 2 0 0 14 2 11 7 0 18 1 0 7 0 46 -1 -2 32 -0 -2 4 -1 -0 16 -0 -0 9 Oklahoma Oregong Pennsylvaniag Rhode Island South Carolinag 17,727 12,678 39,823 3,494 23,321 29 16 9 9 14 2 5 3 3 1 17 7 6 3 0 1 3 0 3 7 15 --1 -- 1 --0 -- 8 --1 -- 0 --0 -- South Dakota Tennessee Texasi Utahc Vermontc 3,157 14,306 139,148 4,550 1,632 2 8 550 18 6 0 2 13 2 1 0 0 78 12 5 2 1 197 1 0 2 -59 --- 0 -2 --- 2 -51 --- 0 -2 --- Virginia Washingtonc West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming 29,514 16,765 3,987 21,560 1,174 5 12 12 31 3 1 4 11 7 1 0 0 0 24 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 -16 17 1 0 -15 8 1 0 -1 9 0 0 -0 0 0 Federal State b Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). - - Not reported. a Excludes inmates in private facilities. Counts were based on National Prisoner Statistics (NPS-1A), 2004. b Allegations were reported for occurrences in 2004; findings may include cases from previous years. c Nonconsensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts. d Information provided for period January 1 to June 30, 2004, only. e Reports of abusive sexual contacts were based on a broader category of inmate sexual misconduct. f Allegations limited to substantiated occurrences only. g Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not in a central database. h Louisiana conducted a manual search of records in 2 facilities with a combined capacity of 2,406 beds. i Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts may include reports of other acts of inmate sexual misconduct. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 13 Appendix table 1b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by State and Federal prison authorities, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Total 1,506 332 684 177 417 81 218 58 Federala State 201 1,305 11 321 96 588 11 166 -417 -81 -218 -58 Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Californiaa 5 4 54 15 126 3 3 19 1 75 0 0 34 3 17 2 0 1 7 15 4 5 32 5 -- 0 4 9 0 -- 1 0 13 1 -- 3 0 0 2 -- Coloradob Connecticut Delaware Floridac Georgiac,d 20 0 7 181 -- 5 0 1 10 -- 6 0 6 143 -- 8 0 0 2 -- -0 5 --- -0 4 --- -0 0 --- -0 1 --- Hawaii Idahoa Illinoisc Indiana Iowae 11 17 2 40 2 4 11 0 17 2 5 4 0 17 -- 1 1 2 6 -- 0 --27 5 0 --8 5 0 --9 -- 0 --10 -- Kansas Kentuckya Louisianaf Maine Marylandc 39 42 18 4 5 13 11 0 3 1 13 26 7 0 1 7 5 10 1 3 1 -6 2 -- 0 -0 0 -- 0 -2 0 -- 1 -3 0 -- Massachusettsc Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri 28 23 33 9 45 2 3 7 1 16 2 5 13 5 21 7 11 9 3 5 -39 18 1 130 -1 13 0 25 -23 4 1 68 -14 0 0 20 Montanac Nebraska Nevadaa New Hampshire New Jerseya 3 12 2 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 -4 -0 -- -2 -0 -- -2 -0 -- -0 -0 -- New Mexicoc New York North Carolinaa,e North Dakota Ohioc 1 181 13 1 26 0 12 13 1 6 0 125 -0 8 1 0 -0 2 -99 -1 -- -1 -0 -- -81 -0 -- -0 -1 -- Oklahoma Oregonc Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolinaa 11 16 34 4 37 2 4 7 2 8 5 12 26 0 12 0 0 0 2 1 5 -14 3 -- 0 -6 0 -- 5 -3 1 -- 0 -0 1 -- South Dakotad Tennessee Texasc Utah Vermontc,d -32 56 7 -- -9 1 2 -- -14 20 2 -- -4 1 0 -- -9 -0 -- -2 -0 -- -4 -0 -- -1 -0 -- Virginia Washingtonc,d West Virginia Wisconsina Wyoming 51 -24 46 9 16 -16 3 7 13 -5 3 0 4 -2 36 2 0 -1 -1 0 -1 -0 0 -0 -0 0 -0 -1 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). - - Not reported. a Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. b Reports of staff sexual harassment are included in a broader category of staff misconduct. 14 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 c Reports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central database. Reports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central database. e Reports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only. f Reports are based on allegations reported in two facilities. d Appendix table 2a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004 Reported inmate-on-inmate Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts Average daily SubUnsubSubUnsubpopulation, 2004 Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Total 271,418 322 73 117 78 65 22 31 9 Alabama Athens Citya Baldwin County Jefferson Countyb 10 498 1,057 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arizona Maricopa County Yavapai County 8,938 482 11 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Arkansas Craighead County Pulaski County Regionalb 248 1,095 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,047 2,180 17,451 5,871 56 3,204 4,038 5,615 5,097 1,819 4,050 1,186 1,571 5 0 30 0 0 1 2 5 11 2 1 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 -0 0 0 1 1 4 0 18 0 0 0 1 -7 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 -0 2 0 1 0 2 3 3 0 0 1 2 0 -0 ---- 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 -0 ---- 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 -0 ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 ---- Colorado Arapahoe County Denver County Douglas County 1,299 1,906 259 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 California Alameda County Kern County Los Angeles County Orange County Plumas County Riverside County Sacramento County San Bernardino County San Diego Countyc San Francisco City and County Santa Clara Countyc Stanislaus Countyc Ventura Countyc District of Columbia 3,477 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 Florida Alachua Countyc Broward County Charlotte Countyc Columbia County Jacksonville City Leon County Manatee County Miami-Dade County Okaloosa Countya Orange Countyc Palm Beach County Pasco County Pinellas Countyb Polk County 957 5,072 423 292 3,414 1,063 1,027 6,721 612 3,380 2,601 1,158 3,213 2,529 11 1 0 0 2 0 5 1 0 3 0 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 8 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 -0 -0 0 0 2 0 1 -0 0 0 0 -0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 -0 0 0 2 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 -0 0 0 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 Georgia Chatham Countyc,d DeKalb County Douglas County Fulton Countyc Jackson Countyc Lowndes County Spalding Countya,b,c 1,414 2,856 674 3,429 147 507 375 0 2 0 16 0 1 0 0 -0 12 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -2 0 --0 -- -0 0 --0 -- -0 0 --0 -- -2 0 --0 -- Idaho Washington County 27 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,479 12 12 0 0 1 1 0 0 Illinois Cook County Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 15 Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004 Reported inmate-on-inmate Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts Average daily SubUnsubSubUnsubpopulation, 2004 Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Indiana Elkhart County Howard County La Porte County Lake Countyc St. Joseph County Wabash County 406 243 282 940 574 95 1 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 -0 2 0 0 0 -0 0 1 0 0 -0 2 0 0 0 -0 0 Iowa Dubuque Countyc Hardin Countyc Polk County 77 62 571 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 --1 --0 --1 --0 Kansas Sedgwick County 1,381 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 Kentucky Daviess County Franklin Countyc Hopkins Countyc Louisville Cityc Woodford Countyc 613 287 390 1,921 72 1 1 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 ----- 0 ----- 0 ----- 0 ----- Louisiana Caddo Parish East Baton Rouge Parish Orleans Parishc Rapides Parish 1,101 1,580 5,931 939 1 4 10 1 1 0 10 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 --0 0 --0 0 --0 0 --0 Maine Cumberland County 558 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maryland Baltimore Cityd Baltimore County Prince George’s County Wicomico Countyc 4,319 1,092 1,203 536 7 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 -0 0 -- -0 0 -- -0 0 -- -0 0 -- Massachusetts Hampden Countyc Suffolk Countyc Worcester Countyc 1,861 1,145 1,281 1 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 ---- ---- ---- ---- Michigan Macomb County Van Buren County Wayne County 1,397 154 2,725 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Minnesota Hennepin County Sherburne Countyc 604 381 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- Mississippi Harrison Countyb,c 935 0 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- 477 163 98 1,430 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 --- 0 0 --- 0 0 --- 0 0 --- Montana Missoula Countyb 397 0 0 0 0 4 1 3 0 Nebraska Douglas County Sarpy County 966 164 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,061 1 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 502 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Missouri Greene Countyb Jasper County Laclede Countyc St. Louis Cityb Nevada Clark Countyb New Hampshire Hillsborough Countya 16 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004 Reported inmate-on-inmate Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts Average daily SubUnsubSubUnsubpopulation, 2004 Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded New Jersey Cumberland County Essex Countyc Gloucester County 589 1,888 337 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 -0 0 -0 0 -0 1 -0 New Mexico Bernalillo Countyc Curry County Dona Ana County San Juan County 1,882 200 859 660 8 1 0 1 -0 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 0 0 -0 1 1 -0 0 1 -0 0 0 -0 1 0 989 926 13,709 585 334 87 0 0 13 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 North Carolina Buncombe County Cabarrus Countyc Henderson Countyc Mecklenburg Countyc New Hanover Countyc 413 202 163 2,046 434 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ----- 0 ----- 0 ----- 0 ----- Ohio Franklin Countyc Hamilton Countye Lorain County Montgomery County Northwest Regional Cor. Center 2,356 2,057 403 910 588 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 --1 0 0 --0 0 0 --1 0 0 --0 0 0 Oklahoma Dewey Countyc Oklahoma County Rogers County 22 2,600 147 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 -0 -- -0 -- -0 -- -0 -- Oregon Clackamas Countyc Jackson County Multnomah Countyc Myrtle Creek City Northern Regional Cor. Fac.b,c Polk County 349 225 1,497 1 123 105 4 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -0 -3 -0 -0 -2 -1 -0 -1 -0 -0 -0 Pennsylvania Adams County Lehigh Countyc Philadelphia Cityb,d,e 255 1,300 7,493 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Carolina Beaufort County Charleston County Greenville County 194 1,344 1,127 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Dakota Pennington County 373 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Tennessee Hamilton County Madison Countyc Nashville-Davidson County Shelby County Wilson County 553 445 3,105 2,317 140 1 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 Texas Amarillo City Bexar County Dallas Countyc El Paso County 68 3,770 7,082 2,224 0 3 8 2 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 --2 0 --0 0 --0 0 --2 New York Erie County Holding Centerc,d Erie County Correctional Fac. New York Cityc Orange County Schenectady Countyc Tioga County Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 17 Appendix table 2a (continued). Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004 Reported inmate-on-inmate Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts Average daily SubUnsubSubUnsubpopulation, 2004 Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Texas (continued) Harris Countyc Jefferson County Montgomery County Nueces County Travis Countyc Williamson County 7,989 933 726 861 2,356 678 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -0 0 0 -1 -0 0 0 -0 -0 0 0 -0 -0 0 0 -1 Utah Salt Lake County Utah County Weber Countyc 2,036 589 1,024 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 -- 0 0 -- 2 1 -- 0 0 -- Virginia Alexandria City Chesapeake Cityc Fairfax County Hampton City Newport News Cityc Pamunky Regional Pittsylvania County Riverside Regional Virginia Beach Cityc Virginia Peninsula Regionalc,d 420 835 1,276 421 643 454 140 1,006 1,365 409 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 --4 0 -0 0 1 --- --1 0 -0 0 0 --- --3 0 -0 0 1 --- --0 0 -0 0 0 --- Washington King Countyc Kitsap Countyc Thurston Countyc Whatcom Countyc Yakima County 2,461 367 472 256 947 5 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 ----1 ----0 ----1 ----0 West Virginia North Central Regionalc 499 2 0 2 0 -- -- -- -- Wisconsin Milwaukee County Outagamie County Walworth County Winnebago Countyc 918 474 306 343 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 -- 0 1 0 -- 0 2 0 -- 0 0 0 -- Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). - - Not reported. a Average daily population was based on data from the Deaths in Custody Reporting Program, 2003 and 2004. b Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only. c Non-consensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts. d Allegations are limited to completed nonconsensual sexual acts only. e Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database. 18 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Appendix table 2b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Total Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded 225 81 42 52 87 34 22 14 Alabama Athens City Baldwin County Jefferson Countya 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- Arizona Maricopa County Yavapai County 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arkansas Craighead Countya,b Pulaski County Regionala 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 --- --- --- --- California Alameda County Kern Countya Los Angeles Countya Orange County Plumas County Riverside County Sacramento Countya San Bernardino Countya San Diego County San Francisco City and County Santa Clara County Stanislaus County Ventura County 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 2 3 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 --0 1 3 --1 0 2 0 0 1 --0 1 1 --1 0 0 0 0 1 --0 0 0 --0 0 1 0 0 0 --0 0 0 --0 0 0 0 0 Colorado Arapahoe County Denver County Douglas County 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 District of Columbia 25 0 0 21 -- -- -- -- Florida Alachua County Broward County Charlotte County Columbia County Jacksonville City Leon County Manatee County Miami-Dade County Okaloosa County Orange Countya Palm Beach Countya Pasco County Pinellas Countyc,d Polk County 0 2 3 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 6 0 --0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 --0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 --0 0 0 Georgia Chatham Countyb DeKalb County Douglas County Fulton County Jackson County Lowndes County Spalding Countya 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 0 1 0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- Idaho Washington County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Illinois Cook Countya 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 19 Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Indiana Elkhart County Howard County La Porte County Lake County St. Joseph County Wabash County 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Iowa Dubuque County Hardin County Polk County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- Kansas Sedgwick County 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 Kentucky Daviess County Franklin Countya Hopkins County Louisville Citya Woodford Countya 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 --- 0 -0 --- 0 -0 --- 0 -0 --- Louisiana Caddo Parish East Baton Rouge Parisha Orleans Parish Rapides Parish 5 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 -1 0 0 -1 0 2 -0 0 1 -0 0 Maine Cumberland County 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maryland Baltimore City Baltimore County Prince George’s County Wicomico County 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Massachusetts Hampden County Suffolk County Worcester County 2 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 Michigan Macomb Countyb Van Buren County Wayne County 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minnesota Hennepin County Sherburne County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Mississippi Harrison Countya,b 1 1 0 0 -- -- -- -- Missouri Greene Countya Jasper County Laclede County St. Louis City 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 -3 2 1 -3 1 0 -0 1 1 -0 0 0 Montana Missoula County -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Nebrasksa Douglas County Sarpy County 9 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Nevada Clark Countyb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Hampshire Hillsborough County 3 0 -- -- 0 0 0 0 20 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded New Jersey Cumberland County Essex County Gloucester County 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 New Mexico Bernalillo County Curry County Dona Ana County San Juan County 4 0 1 1 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 1 4 0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 4 1 10 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 -0 -7 -1 -0 -5 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -1 North Carolina Buncombe County Cabarrus Countya Henderson County Mecklenburg County New Hanover County 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 0 Ohio Franklin County Hamilton Countya Lorain County Montgomery County Northwest Regional Cor. Center 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 Oklahoma Dewey Countya Oklahoma County Rogers County 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 -4 0 -0 0 -4 0 -0 0 Oregon Clackamas County Jackson County Multnomah County Myrtle Creek City Northern Regional Cor. Facilitya Polk County 1 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 1 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 2 1 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 -1 -0 0 0 -0 -0 Pennsylvania Adams Countya Lehigh County Philadelphia Citya 2 2 14 1 1 9 0 1 1 1 0 0 -3 -- -3 -- -0 -- -0 -- South Carolina Beaufort County Charleston County Greenville County 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 South Dakota Pennington County 3 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 Tennessee Hamilton County Madison County Nashville-Davidson Countya Shelby County Wilson Countya 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ---- 0 0 ---- 0 0 ---- 0 0 ---- 1 -1 1 1 -0 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 0 -1 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 New York Erie County Holding Centera Erie County Correctional Facility New York Citya Orange County Schenectady Countya,c Tioga County Texas Amarillo City Bexar County Dallas County El Paso County Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 21 Appendix table 2b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported by local jail authorities, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Texas (continued) Harris County Jefferson County Montgomery County Nueces County Travis Countyc Williamson County 3 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 -1 0 1 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 -0 0 3 0 0 -0 Utah Salt Lake County Utah County Weber Countya 3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 -- 1 0 -- 0 0 -- 1 0 -- Virgina Alexandria Citya Chesapeake City Fairfax County Hampton City Newport News Citya Pamunky Regional Pittsylvania County Riverside Regional Virginia Beach City Virginia Peninsula Regional 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 6 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 1 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 1 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 1 0 Washington King Countya Kitsap County Thurston County Whatcom Countya Yakima County 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 1 -0 -0 0 -0 -0 0 -0 -0 1 -0 West Virginia North Central Regional 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wisconsin Milwaukee County Outagamie Countya Walworth County Winnebago County 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 -0 0 0 -0 0 3 -0 0 0 -0 0 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). a Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. b Reports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only. c Reports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central database. d Reports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central database. 22 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Appendix table 2c. Local jail jurisdictions with no allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence and staff sexual misconduct, 2004 Jurisdiction Alabama Carbon Hill Citya Choctaw County Covington Countyb Dallas County Etowah County Lauderdale Countyc Saraland City Alaska Kodiak City Unalaska City Arizona Apache County Coconino County Graham County La Paz Countyc Pima County Yuma County Arkansas Crossett City Fayetteville City Hot Spring County Marianna Citya Springdale City Washington County Yell County California El Dorado County Fresno County Glendale Cityc Kings County Lake County Nevada County Sutter County Florida Collier County Hamilton Countyc,d Indian River County Santa Rosa County Georgia Acworth City Baker Countya Clinch Countya Cobb County Effingham County Elbert Countya McDuffie County Milledgeville Citya Peach County Stewart County Troup County Upson County Washington County Idaho Ada County Bingham County Elmore Countya Jerome County Average daily population, 2004 1 30 150 178 660 155 6 9 1 121 490 109 195 1,739 628 25 34 22 5 10 251 24 323 3,019 12 311 256 181 273 956 90 475 353 22 4 30 2,083 240 65 161 9 63 90 356 166 50 927 89 31 34 Jurisdiction Illinois Bond Countya Boone County Du Page County Ford County Kendall County McHenry Countye Peoria Countyb,f,g,h Schuyler County St. Clair Countyc Washington County Will County Indiana Daviess Countya,c,d,e Dearborn Countya,c Delaware Countyd Johnson County Knox Countya Marion Countya Orange County Vanderburgh County Wayne County Iowa Adair County Johnson County Woodbury County Average daily population, 2004 20 95 814 41 131 266 404 21 442 9 521 90 194 274 249 81 1,089 81 329 209 4 77 230 Kansas Allen County Butler County Reno County 23 188 136 Kentucky Christian County Clark Countya Henderson County Jackson County Laurel County Lincoln County Regional McCracken County Warren County 690 144 371 85 305 107 422 573 Louisiana Livingston Parish Shreveport City St. Charles Parishc West Baton Rouge Parish 128 52 338 279 Maine Penobscot County Waldo County 156 50 Maryland Dorchester County Frederick County 158 452 Michigan Allegan County Bay County Berrien County Calhoun County Charlevoix County Grand Traverse County Marquette County Newaygo Countyc 141 214 397 582 65 143 75 195 Jurisdiction Average daily population, 2004 Minnesota Carver Countyc,d Dakota County Douglas County Kandiyohi County Otter Tail County Ramsey County Stearns Countya Todd County Winona County 94 222 64 152 82 350 160 45 54 Mississippi Copiah County De Soto County Hinds County Neshoba County Rankin County Union County 49 280 866 43 279 41 Missouri Dunklin Countyb Franklin County Grundy County Kansas City Madison County Sullivan County 70 115 11 177 15 1 Montana Yellowstone Countye 399 Nebraska Colfax County Franklin County Morrill County Pierce County 13 5 5 11 Nevada Las Vegas Cityb,f,g,h Mineral County 884 22 New Jersey Bergen County Morris County 972 286 New Mexico Artesia City Roosevelt County 3 75 New York Monroe County Oneida Countyc,e Onondaga County 1,410 415 604 North Carolina Bertie-Martin Regionala Craven County Davidson County Franklin County Lenoir County Moore County Nash County Northampton County Orange County 95 189 235 114 123 92 205 76 130 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 23 Appendix table 2c (continued). Local jail jurisdictions with no allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence and staff sexual misconduct, 2004 Jurisdiction Average daily population, 2004 Jurisdiction Average daily population, 2004 Jurisdiction North Carolina (continued) Polk Countyg Robeson Countyc Rowan County Union County Yadkin County 25 417 202 242 28 South Carolina Allendale County Berkeley County Clarendon County Darlington County Georgetown County 30 303 65 171 185 North Dakota Adams County Cass County 2 200 South Dakota Lake County Minnehaha County 11 468 Ohio Adams County Allen County Cleveland City Darke County Geauga Countye Huron County Mahoning County Multicounty Cor. Center Noble County Trumbull County Wood County 39 250 204 30 47 100 704 142 14 275 133 Tennessee Benton Countyc Blount County Cumberland County Fayette Countyc,h Sevier County Washington County 63 343 130 97 265 432 Washington Adams Countya Kent Cityg Lynnwood City Okanogan County Skamania County Spokane County 23 140 39 139 26 470 Oklahoma Adair County Cleveland County Garfield County Jefferson County LeFlore County Midwest City 5 190 66 25 68 11 411 251 215 107 21 622 West Virginia Central Regional Eastern Regional South Central Regional 261 368 400 3 571 143 562 13 226 20 877 696 61 486 126 78 218 16 217 7 276 50 155 41 245 516 160 588 Wisconsin Dodge County La Crosse County Ozaukee County Polk County Price County Racine County Oregon Cottage Grove City Lane County Lincoln Countya Washington County Texas Carrollton City Comal County Dallam County Denton County Fort Bend County Grand Prairie City Gregg County Hardin County Jackson County Kaufman County Lee County Maverick County Menard County Nacogdoches County Refugio County Rockwall County Shelby Countya,d Starr County Taylor County Walker County Webb County Wyoming Lincoln County Natrona County 20 258 Pennsylvania Armstrong County Blair County Butler County Dauphin County Erie County 112 251 233 1,239 705 Virginia Albermarle-Charlottesville Reg.b,f,g,h Augusta County Blue Ridge Regional Central Virginia Regional Chesterfield County Danville City Mecklenburg County Montgomery County Norfolk City Smyth County Average daily population, 2004 Note: The average daily population for all facilities in Appendix table 2c is 60,350. a The average daily population was based on the Deaths in Custody Reporting Program, 2003 and 2004. b Reports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central database. c Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only. d Reports of staff sexual misconduct are limited to substantiated occurrences only. e Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed occurrences only. f Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts are not recorded in a central database. g Reports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central database. h Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database. 24 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 484 194 923 380 314 239 126 152 1,639 70 Appendix table 3a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2004 Average Reported inmate-on-inmate daily nonconsensual sexual acts population, Allega- SubUnsubUn2004 tions stantiated stantiated founded Total Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Allega- SubUnsubUntions stantiated stantiated founded 31,068 12 0 8 4 14 2 0 3 Arizona Florence Correctional Facility (CCA) Phoenix West State Prison (CSC) 1,754 440 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 California California City Correctional Center (CCA)a Central Valley Community Cor. Fac. (GEO)a 2,620 515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --- --- --- --- Colorado Crowley County Correctional Facility (CCA)a 911 2 0 1 1 -- -- -- -- Florida Gadsen Correctional Facility (CCA) Moore Haven Correctional Facility (GEO) South Bay Correctional Facility (GEO)a 1,036 745 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- Georgia Coffee Correctional Facility (CCA) 1,490 2 0 2 0 11 2 0 0 Louisiana Allen Correctional Center (GEO) 1,456 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 Mississippi Delta Correctional Facility (CCA)a Walnut Grove Youth Cor. Fac. (Cornell) 258 758 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 Montana Community Counseling and Corr. Services 161 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Jersey Tremont House (VOA) New Mexico Torrance County Detention Facility (CCA)a 730 0 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- Ohio Columbiana County Jail (CiviGenics) Lake Erie Correctional Institution (MTC)a 183 1,366 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 1 --- --- --- --- Oklahoma David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center (CCA)a,b Davis Correctional Facility (CCA)a 1,206 952 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 --- --- --- --- Pennsylvania Joseph Coleman Center (CEC) 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tennessee Hardeman County Correctional Center (CCA) South Central Correctional Center (CCA)c,d Whiteville Correctional Facility (CCA) 1,950 1,620 1,471 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 Texas Bradshaw State Jail (MTC) Cleveland Correctional Center (GEO) East Hidalgo Detention Center (LCS) Jefferson County Jail (CSC) Lindsey State Jail (CCA)a Mineral Wells Pre-Parole Facility (CCA) South Texas Intermediate Sanction Fac. (CSC)a Val Verde County Jail (GEO) 1,970 519 539 382 1,015 2,060 210 885 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---0 0 0 0 0 ---0 0 0 0 0 ---0 0 0 0 0 ---0 Virginia Lawrenceville Correctional Center (GEO)e 1,566 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). Initials identify the following: CCA - Corrections Corporation of America. CEC - Community Education Centers. CiviGenics - CiviGenics Corporation. Cornell - Cornell Companies, Incorporated. CSC - Correctional Services Corporation. GEO - Global Expertise in Outsourcing. LCS - Louisiana Corrections Services, Incorporated. MTC - Management and Training Corporation. VOA Volunteers of America. - - Not reported. a Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts. b Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only. c Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts are not recorded in a central database. d Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database. e Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed occurrences only. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 25 Appendix table 3b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported in private prisons and jails, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubSubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded 27 13 6 6 14 2 10 2 Arizona Florence Correctional Facility (CCA) Phoenix West State Prison (CSC) Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 California California City Correctional Center (CCA) Central Valley Community Correctional Fac. (GEO)a 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 -- 0 -- 1 -- 0 -- Colorado Crowley County Correctional Facility (CCA)a 3 0 0 3 -- -- -- -- Florida Gadsen Correctional Facility (CCA) Moore Haven Correctional Facility (GEO) South Bay Correctional Facility (GEO) 9 1 1 6 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 Georgia Coffee Correctional Facility (CCA) 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 Louisiana Allen Correctional Center (GEO) 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Mississippi Delta Correctional Facility (CCA)a Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility (Cornell) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 Montana Community Counseling and Corr. Services 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Jersey Tremont House (VOA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Mexico Torrance County Detention Facility (CCA)b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio Columbiana County Jail (CiviGenics)a Lake Erie Correctional Institution (MTC) 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 -1 -0 -1 -0 Oklahoma David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center (CCA)a Davis Correctional Facility (CCA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 Pennsylvania Joseph Coleman Center (CEC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tennessee Hardeman County Correctional Center (CCA) South Central Correctional Center (CCA)b Whiteville Correctional Facility (CCA) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Texas Bradshaw State Jail (MTC) Cleveland Correctional Center (GEO) East Hidalgo Detention Center (LCS) Jefferson County Jail (CSC) Lindsey State Jail (CCA) Mineral Wells Pre-Parole Facility (CCA) South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility (CSC)a Val Verde County Jail (GEO) 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 --0 0 0 0 0 0 --0 1 0 0 0 0 --0 0 0 0 0 1 --0 Virginia Lawrenceville Correctional Center (GEO) 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). Initials identify the following: CCA - Corrections Corporation of America. CEC Community Education Centers. CiviGenics - CiviGenics Corporation. Cornell - Cornell Companies, Incorporated. CSC - Correctional Services Corporation. GEO - Global Expertise in Outsourcing. LCS - Louisiana Corrections Services, Incorporated. MTC - Management and Training Corporation. VOA - Volunteers of America. - - Not reported. 26 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 a Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include staff sexual harassment. b Reports of staff sexual misconduct are limited to substantiated occurrences only. Appendix table 4a. Allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual violence reported in other correctional facilities, by type, 2004 Average daily population, 2004 Total Reported inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts Allega- SubUnsubUntions stantiated stantiated founded Reported inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts Allega- SubUnsubUntions stantiated stantiated founded 9,705 10 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1,012 643 699 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 227 416 436 254 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 El Paso, TX Florence, AZ Houston, TX Laredo, TXa Los Fresnos, TX 553 1,042 499 378 755 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 Miami, FL San Diego, CA San Pedro, CAb,c Tacoma, WA 554 822 483 403 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 159 38 61 17 0 4 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 --0 0 0 --0 0 0 --0 0 0 --0 0 0 U.S. Military Air Force Army Marine Corps Navy U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Aguadilla, PRa Aurora, CO Batavia, NY El Centro, CAb Elizabeth, NJ Jails in Indian country Chinle Youth Corrections, AZ Gila River Dept. of Cor. and Rehab., AZa,b Gila River Juvenile Det. and Rehab. Ctr., AZ Hopi Rehabilitation Center, AZ Navajo Department of Cor.-Crownpoint, NM Navajo Department of Cor.-Window Rock, AZ Omaha Tribal Police Department, NEa Southern Ute Detention Center, CO Tohono O'odham Detention Center, AZ Walter Miner Law Enforcement Center-Adult, SD Refusal 18 44 111 22 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). - - Not reported. a Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts. b Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only. c Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed occurrences only. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 27 Appendix table 4b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates reported in other correctional facilities, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with inmates sexual harassment of inmates SubUnsubSubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded 3 2 0 0 3 1 0 2 U.S. Military Air Force Army Marine Corps Navy Total 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Aguadilla, PR Aurora, CO Batavia, NY El Centro, CA Elizabeth, NJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 1 -0 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 El Paso, TX Florence, AZ Houston, TX Laredo, TX Los Fresnos, TX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miami, FL San Diego, CA San Pedro, CA Tacoma, WA 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 Jails in Indian country Chinle Youth Corrections, AZ Gila River Dept. of Cor. and Rehabilitation, AZ* Gila River Juvenile Detention and Rehabilitation, AZ Hopi Rehabilitation Center, AZ Navajo Department of Corrections-Crownpoint, NM Navajo Department of Corrections-Window Rock, AZ Omaha Tribal Police Department, NE Southern Ute Detention Center, CO Tohono O'odham Detention Center, AZ Walter Miner Law Enforcement Center-Adult, SD Refusal 0 0 0 0 Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). - - Not reported. *Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include staff sexual harassment. 28 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Appendix table 5a. Allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence reported by State juvenile administrators, by type, 2004 Number of youth held 12/31/2004 Total Reported youth-on-youth nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported youth-on-youth abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded 41,196 278 85 137 38 131 42 49 13 Alabamaa,b Alaskab Arizona Arkansasc Californiab,d 592 251 617 0 3,678 5 1 9 -11 5 0 6 -8 0 1 3 -3 0 0 0 -0 --2 --- --1 --- --1 --- --0 --- Colorado Connecticuta Delawarea,b District of Columbiaa Floridaa 849 66 211 241 2,088 3 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 -0 5 1 0 -0 2 0 0 -0 1 0 0 -0 0 Georgiaa Hawaiia,b Idahob Illinois Indianaa,b 6,363 51 412 1,487 1,261 9 0 0 1 13 1 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 --0 -- 0 --0 -- 7 --0 -- 0 --0 -- 243 475 621 451 195 0 9 21 12 0 0 9 7 0 0 0 0 14 3 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 3 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 679 1,122 435 137 315 16 1 0 3 1 3 1 0 3 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 --4 13 3 --4 13 12 --0 0 1 --0 0 753 113 261 396 119 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 -0 1 -- 0 -0 0 -- 1 -0 1 -- 0 -0 0 -- New Jerseya New Mexico New Yorka North Carolinaa North Dakotaa 946 270 1,568 660 94 4 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 6 2 1 0 2 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Ohioi Oklahomae Oregona Pennsylvania Rhode Islande 1,662 372 855 624 220 22 7 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 South Carolinae South Dakota Tennessee Texasj Utah 818 170 525 4,383 674 20 0 5 62 0 7 0 1 17 0 4 0 2 45 0 8 0 2 0 0 11 0 1 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 Vermontg Virginiaa Washington West Virginia Wisconsina Wyominga 22 1,028 784 269 650 120 0 2 5 -11 0 0 1 0 -2 0 0 1 3 -8 0 0 0 1 -1 0 1 0 19 -10 0 1 0 --7 0 0 0 --0 0 0 0 --3 0 Iowae Kansase Kentuckya Louisiana Maine Marylanda Massachusettsb,e Michiganb,f,g Minnesota Mississippia Missouria Montanaa,b Nebraskah Nevadae New Hampshireb,h Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). - - Not reported. a All sexual acts involving youth under age 18 are considered nonconsensual. b Non-consensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts. c Arkansas does not have any State-operated juvenile facilities. d Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database. e All sexual acts involving youth under age 16 are considered nonconsensual. f Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only. g Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed occurrences only. h All sexual acts involving youth under age 17 are considered nonconsensual. i All sexual acts involving youth under age 14 are considered nonconsensual. j All sexual acts involving youth under age 21 are considered nonconsensual. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 29 Appendix table 5b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth reported by State juvenile administrators, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of youth SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Total 467 69 204 175 55 16 27 9 Alabamaa Alaska Arizona Arkansasb Californiaa 8 0 12 -12 0 0 6 -2 0 0 2 -3 8 0 4 -1 -0 1 --- -0 0 --- -0 0 --- -0 1 --- Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida 5 2 0 1 30 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 10 3 0 0 0 16 -1 2 0 10 -0 1 0 3 -1 1 0 1 -0 0 0 6 Georgia Hawaiia,c Idaho Illinoisd Indiana 7 1 3 0 14 0 1 2 0 9 1 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 2 0 -4 -1 0 -1 -1 0 -3 -0 0 -0 -0 Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine 0 7 27 25 3 0 1 3 0 1 0 4 0 5 2 0 2 24 20 0 0 5 5 5 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 Maryland Massachusetts Michigana,c Minnesota Mississippi 18 2 4 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 10 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 8 1 -0 0 3 1 -0 0 5 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 Missouri Montanaa Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire 2 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 -2 2 2 0 -0 0 1 0 -1 2 1 0 -1 0 0 New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota 16 0 18 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 5 3 0 16 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ohiod Oklahoma Oregona,c Pennsylvania Rhode Islandc 9 19 3 4 1 0 1 2 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 5 14 0 3 0 -0 -0 0 -0 -0 0 -0 -0 0 -0 -0 0 South Carolina South Dakota Tennesseea Texasd Utah 6 0 23 138 3 0 0 1 13 3 1 0 0 125 0 4 0 19 0 0 1 0 --3 0 0 --2 0 0 --1 0 0 --0 0 11 14 2 6 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 1 3 0 0 3 9 0 3 0 -0 -1 1 0 -0 -0 0 0 -0 -1 1 0 -0 -0 0 0 Vermonta Virginia Washingtona West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). - - Not reported. a Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. b Arkansas does not have any State-operated juvenile facilities. 30 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 c Reports of staff sexual misconduct based on substantiated allegations only. d Reports of staff sexual harassment are not recorded in a central database. Appendix table 6a. Allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence reported in local and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004 Number of youth held 12/31/2004 Reported youth-on-youth nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubAllegation stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported youth-on-youth abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubAllegation stantiated stantiated Unfounded 10,848 159 49 72 26 82 42 34 6 221 106 12 3 5 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 1 2 -- 0 1 -- 1 1 -- 0 0 -- 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arkansas Alexander Youth Services Centera Northeast AR Regional Juv Proga,b Pulaski County Juv Detentiona Youth Emergency Shelterc 141 38 32 12 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 -0 -- 1 -0 -- 0 -0 -- 0 -0 -- California Barry J. Nidorf Juvenile Halla Kearny-Mesa Juv Detention Facilityb Lindsay Programb Los Padrinos Juvenile Halla Main Campus, Boys Republica,b Santa Clara County Juvenile Halla Trinity-Whitewater 582 208 48 473 134 245 118 1 6 2 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 --0 -2 1 1 --0 -0 1 0 --0 -2 0 0 --0 -0 0 Colorado Excelsior Youth Centerb,d Greeley Youth Centerb Threshhold, Cedar Springs, Inc.a,b 164 18 30 3 1 9 0 0 5 2 1 4 1 0 0 ---- ---- ---- ---- Florida Avon Park Youth Academy Bowling Green Youth Academy Gulf Coast Youth Academy Marion Youth Development Centera Polk Juvenile Correctional Facilitya South Pines Academy 199 52 92 96 158 64 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Illinois Cook County Juv Temp Det Ctra,b,e Residential Treatment Ctr, La Villa 402 101 6 2 0 1 3 1 3 0 4 7 0 2 1 4 3 1 Indiana Campagna Academyb Kokomo Academya,b Whites Residential and Family Srvcs 41 116 148 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 --8 --3 --5 --0 Iowa Woodward Academy 153 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 49 79 57 9 0 2 31 3 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 20 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 ---1 0 ---0 1 ---1 0 ---0 12 36 166 3 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 ---- ---- ---- ---- 77 85 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Alabama Camp Mitnicka Laurel Oaks Behavioral Health Ctr Treatment Center, Lee Countya,b Alaska Jesse Lee Campusa Georgia The Bridge, Inc. Kansas Forbes Juvenile Attention Center Judge Riddel Boys Rancha,b Marillac Centera,b Newton Campusb Raymond Cerf Home Kentucky Baptist Youth Rancha,b Dessie Scott Childrens Homeb Hack Estep Home for Boysb Louisiana Florida Parishes Juvenile Detentiona La Methodist Children's Homea Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 31 Appendix table 6a (continued). Allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence reported in local and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004 Number of youth held 12/31/2004 Reported youth-on-youth Reported youth-on-youth nonconsensual sexual acts abusive sexual contacts Alllega- SubUnsubAllega- SubUnsubtions stantiated stantiated Unfounded ations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Massachusetts Germaine Lawrence, Inc.a Stetson School, Inc. 77 110 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 Michigan Clinton Campus, Holy Cross Servicesd,e Curtis House, Holy Cross Services Eagle Village, Inc.a Michigan Youth Correctional Facilitya Ottawa Co Juvenile Detention Center Starr Commonwealth/Albionb 109 12 44 480 29 194 1 6 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 -- 14 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 147 8 2 5 1 -- -- -- -- 32 38 9 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 Nebraska Home Campus Prog. (Boys Town) 447 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Nevada Canyon State Academya,b Clark Co Dept of Juv Just Servicesa Ridge View Youth Services Centera,b 216 176 481 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -- -0 -- -0 -- -0 -- New Mexico Bernalillo Co Juv Detention Centera 71 1 0 1 0 5 1 4 0 11 75 71 256 118 137 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 3 2 -- 1 2 0 0 2 -- 0 0 2 3 0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 -- North Carolina Boys and Girls Home of North Carolina 67 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 North Dakota The Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch 64 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Ohio Catholic Charities Svcs./Parmadalea,b 80 0 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- Oregon Parrott Creek Residential Programa Minnesota Austin Youth Ranch Missouri St. James Facilityb Montana Inter-Mt Children's Homea Swan Valley Youth Academya New York Cottage 10, Elmcrest Children’s Ctr Holbrook Agency Operated Boardinga NYC Dept of Juv Justicea Residential Center, Canaana Residential Treatment Ctr, Syosetta St. Anne Instituteb,d,e 20 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 Pennsylvania Abraxas I (Marienville), Cornella Abraxas of Ohio (Shelby), Cornella Berks Co Youth Ctr. (Juv. Detention)b Campbell Griffin Centera Colorado Group Home/Shelter (CO)a,b Evergreen Housed Harborcreek-Main Campusb Main Campus, Tunkhannock Pennsylvania Clinical Schoola,b Shuman Juvenile Detention Centera,b St. Gabriel's Halla 267 109 55 244 15 10 108 106 104 78 205 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -5 -0 -4 --0 0 0 -0 -0 -2 --0 0 0 -5 -0 -1 --0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 --0 Rhode Island Harmony Hill School 57 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 32 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Appendix table 6a (continued). Allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence reported in local and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004 Number of youth held 12/31/2004 Reported youth-on-youth nonconsensual sexual acts SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported youth-on-youth abusive sexual contacts SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded South Dakota Sky Ranch for Boysa Springfield Academyb Western So Dakota Juv Serv 34 73 65 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 -2 0 -2 0 -0 0 -0 Tennessee Deer Valley Memphis Boys Town 37 80 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 Texas Coastal Bend Youth Citya GEO Grp, Coke Co Juv Just Ctra,b Hays Co Juv. Det. and Boot Campa Lifeworks Emergency Shelter 0 203 99 16 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 -0 2 0 -0 1 0 -0 1 0 -0 0 Utah Heritage Centera 146 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Washington Ruth Dykeman Children’s Center 38 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 West Virginia Main Campus - Davis Stuart, Inc.a Northern Regional Juv. Det. Ctr.a Princeton Facilitya,b 36 7 21 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -- -0 -- -0 -- -0 -- Wisconsin Eau Claire Academya 80 1 1 0 0 6 6 0 0 Wyoming Residential Treatment, Laramiea,b 57 3 3 0 0 -- -- -- -- Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). - - Not reported. a All sexual acts involving youth under age 18 are considered nonconsensual. b Nonconsensual sexual acts may include abusive sexual contacts. c Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database. d Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed occurrences only. e Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 33 Appendix table 6b. Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth reported in local and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of youth SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded 70 11 34 19 48 6 17 23 Alabama Camp Mitnick Laurel Oaks Behavioral Health Ctr Treatment Center, Lee Countya 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- Alaska Jesse Lee Campus 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arkansas Alexander Youth Services Center Northeast AR Regional Juvenile Program Pulaski County Juvenile Detention Center Youth Emergency Shelter 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 California Barry J Nidorf Juvenile Hall Kearny-Mesa Juvenile Detention Facility Lindsay Program Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall Main Campus, Boys Republica Santa Clara County Juvenile Hall Trinity-Whitewater 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 Colorado Excelsior Youth Center Greeley Youth Centera Threshhold, Cedar Springs, Inc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 Florida Avon Park Youth Academy Bowling Green Youth Academya Gulf Coast Youth Academy Marion Youth Development Center Polk Juvenile Correctional Facility South Pines Academy 5 4 0 1 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 Georgia The Bridge, Inc. 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Illinois Cook Co Juvenile Temporary Detention Residential Treatment Center 7 2 0 1 7 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Indiana Campagna Academy Kokomo Academya Whites Residential and Family Services 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 -0 1 -0 0 -0 0 -0 Iowa Woodward Academy 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kansas Forbes Juvenile Attention Center Judge Riddel Boys Rancha Marillac Center Newton Campus Raymond Cerf Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 2 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 2 0 -0 0 0 Kentucky Baptist Youth Ranch Dessie Scott Children's Home Hack Estep Home for Boys 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- Louisiana Florida Parishes Juvenile Detention Center La Methodist Children's Home 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Total 34 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Appendix table 6b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth reported in local and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth sexual harassment of youth SubUnsubSubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Allegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Massachusetts Germaine Lawrence, Inc. Stetson School, Inc. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Michigan Clinton Campus, Holy Cross Services Curtis House, Holy Cross Services Eagle Village, Inc. Michigan Youth Correctional Facility Ottawa Co Juvenile Detention Centerb Starr Commonwealth/Albiona 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -- 0 0 0 0 1 -- 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 -- Minnesota Austin Youth Ranch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Missouri St. James Facility 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -1 -0 -1 -0 Nebraska Home Campus Prog. (Boys Town) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nevada Canyon State Academya Clark Co Dept of Juvenile Justice Services Ridge View Youth Services Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Mexico Bernalillo County Juv Detention Center 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 New York Cottage 10, Elmcrest Children’s Center Holbrook Agency Operated Boarding Home NYC Dept of Juvenile Justicea Residential Center, Canaan Residential Treatment Center, Syosett St. Anne Institute 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 North Carolina Boys and Girls Home of North Carolina, Inc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Dakota The Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ohio Catholic Charities Services/Parmadalea 1 0 1 0 -- -- -- -- Oregon Parrott Creek Residential Programa 0 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- Pennsylvania Abraxas I (Marienville), Cornell Abraxas of Ohio (Shelby), Cornell Berks Co Youth Center (Juv Detention) Campbell Griffin Center Colorado Group Home/Shelter (Co)a Evergreen House Harborcreek-Main Campus Main Campus, Tunkhannock Pennsylvania Clinical School Shuman Juvenile Detention Center St. Gabriel's Hall 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -0 1 0 0 0 0 Rhode Island Harmony Hill School 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Montana Inter-Mt Children's Home Swan Valley Youth Academy Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 35 Appendix table 6b (continued). Allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth reported in local and privately operated juvenile facilities, by type, 2004 Reported allegations of staff sexual misconduct with youth SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded Reported allegations of staff sexual harassment of youth SubUnsubAllegations stantiated stantiated Unfounded South Dakota Sky Ranch for Boys Springfield Academyb Western So Dakota Juvenile Services Ctr 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tennessee Deer Valley Memphis Boys Town 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Texas Coastal Bend Youth City GEO Group Coke County Juv Just Ctr Hays Co Juvenile Detention And Boot Lifeworks Emergency Shelter 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 14 0 0 Utah Heritage Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington Ruth Dykeman Children’s Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Virginia Main Campus - Davis Stuart, Inc. Northern Regional Juvenile Detention Ctr Princeton Facilitya 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- Wisconsin Eau Claire Academy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wyoming Residential Treatment, Laramiea 0 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- Note: The total number of allegations includes ongoing investigations (not shown). - - Not reported. a Reports of staff sexual misconduct may include reports of staff sexual harassment. b Reports of staff sexual misconduct are based on substantiated allegations only. 36 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Appendix table 6c. Private and local juvenile facilities with no allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence and staff sexual misconduct, 2004 Facility Alabama Camp Saylaa,b,c Jefferson Co. Youth Detention Center Three Springs School of Madison-Main Campus Number of youth held on 12/31/2004 19 84 48 Arizona 4321 South Evergreen Home Arizona's Children's Association Maricopa County Juvenile Court Center Mohave County Juvenile Detention Center Mountain Facility Tumbleweed-Open Handsa,c 7 102 267 34 42 12 California Browning Housed Camp Barrett Camp Fred Miller Camp Joseph M. Paige Fred Finch Youth Centerb,c Girls Rehabilitation Facility House #7 Joplin Youth Center Main Campus, Optimist Youth Homes Mid Valley Youth Ctr (Residential Treatment)a Patrick House San Jose Home Silverlake Residence Trinity-Fair Oaks Trinity-Main Campus, Residential Treatment Ctr Trinity-Yucaipa 6 96 112 120 29 50 4 62 93 84 6 6 15 7 70 66 Colorado Colorado Boys Ranch, La Junta Cottage 28, El Pueblo Boys and Girls Ranch, Inc. Jeffco Jefferson Co Juvenile Residential Work Crew Connecticut Apt/Daytop-Alpha House Lake Grove at Durham Touchstone District of Columbia Dupont III Group Home Florida Bay Point Schools (North) Better Outlook Ctr Blackwater Career Development Center Brevard Group Treatment Home Camp-E-Ku-Sumee Camp E-Ma-Chamee Camp E-Toh-Anee Camp E-Tu-Makee Camp E-Wen-Akee Gulf/Lake Academy Kennedy Campus Manatee Juvenile Boot Camp Polk Co Juvenile Boot Camp Georgia Paulding Regional Youth Detention Center Hawaii Emergency Shelter, Salvation Army Refusal 6 17 14 99 114 20 Facility Idaho Emancipation Home, Idaho Youth Ranch Ranch Campus, Idaho Youth Ranch Southwest Idaho Juvenile Detention Center Number of youth held on 12/31/2004 10 33 48 Illinois Chaddock Champaign Co Juvenile Detention Center Woodridge Facility Program 80 11 110 Indiana Alternative Housed,e Christian Havend La Porte County Juvenile Services Center Ladoga Academy Marion County Juvenile Justice Complex Southwest Indiana Regional Youth Village 30 21 23 85 135 127 Iowa 712 House Juvenile Detention Center Rosedale Shelter Scott Co Juvenile Detention Center Stop Home #1, #2, #3, Four Oaks Woodlands Treatment Center Kansas Girls Home, Temporary Lodging for Children 7 16 10 8 34 24 8 Kentucky Louisville Metro Youth Detention Center 45 Louisiana Juvenile Detentiond 11 Maine Goodwill Hinckley Home for Boys and Girls Semi-Independent Living Program 120 4 Maryland Bowling Brook Prep School Karma Academy for Boys Residential Program, Baltimore 136 13 100 7 28 25 20 53 47 39 50 28 97 178 24 67 Massachusetts Key Program, Inc., Chestnut Street Springfield Secure Treatment Spectrum Boys Programd,e Michigan Barat Child and Family Servicesf Monroe County Youth Center Moreau Center, Holy Cross Children’s Service Oakland Co Childrens Villagec St. Jude's Home 7 45 24 15 20 66 272 5 92 7 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 37 Appendix table 6c (continued). Private and local juvenile facilities with no allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence and staff sexual misconduct, 2004 Facility Minnesota Bar-None Residential Treatment Servicesd,e,f Bricelyn Group Home Hennepin County Home School Mille Lacs Academy Prairie Lakes Youth Programs Residential Treatment Center, Duluth Mississippi Harrison County Juvenile Detention Center Henley Young Juvenile Justice Center Missouri Hilltop, Jackson Co Court Services Main Campus, Evangelical Children’s Homes St Louis (City) Juvenile Detention Center Montana Cascade Co Juvenile Detention Center Nebraska Douglas Co Youth Center Epworth Village, Inc. Father Flanagan’s Emgcy Shelter (Orlando Fl) Father Flanagan’s Emgcy Shltr (Washington DC) Father Flanagan’s Emgcy Shltr (Grand Island) Lancaster County Youth Services Center Tallahasse Residence: 2752 Hollyhock Hill Nevada Silverstate Academy New Jersey Essex Co Juvenile Detention Center Somerset Hills School Warren Acres Juvenile Detention Center Women Risingc New York Children's Home of Jefferson Co Hurst Group Home Lincoln Hall Shell Farm Children’s Center Queens Outreach Haven Residential Treatment Center, Randolph Residential Treatment Center, Yonkers Residential Treatment Program-Dewey Shiller Street Group Home Woodfield Cottage Secure Detention Facility North Carolina Bertie-Martin Beaufort Shelter Home, Inc.-Girls Guilford Co Juvenile Detention Center Rainbow House North Dakota Northwest Youth Assessment Center Ohio Co Detention Center, Cleveland Co Juvenile Detention Center, Lima Hamilton Co Juvenile Court Youth Center Horizon I, The Twelve, Inc. Oakview Group Home Rosemont Centere,f 38 Number of youth held on 12/31/2004 60 5 123 69 28 95 33 24 51 49 61 9 152 65 15 10 7 56 6 140 159 75 11 10 54 11 227 25 9 107 No response 90 9 21 12 28 6 3 80 28 137 8 13 18 Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 Facility Number of youth held on 12/31/2004 Oklahoma Comanche Co Regional Juv Detention Center Oaks Indian Mission (Level C) Oklahoma Co Juvenile Detention Centerd Yth and Fmly Services of No Central Oklahoma 22 42 68 7 Oregon Donald E Long Home (Dept of Multnomah Co) Girls Ranch, Bob Belloni Ranch, Inc. St. Mary's Home for Boys 53 7 57 Pennsylvania Abraxas Leadership Development Program Allentown Secure Treatment Unit Bucks County Residential Service Unit Glen Mills Schoolsf Henning Shelter Main Campus, George Junior Republic Main Campus, Children’s Home of Easton New Directions Shelter (Pennsylvania) Northampton Co Juv Justice Centera,b,c Pressley Ridge at Ohiopyle Summit Academy Sweeney Homea,b,c Treatment Unit for Boys (Unit #2), Fleetwood York Special Needs Group Home 117 16 9 837 27 492 51 91 27 63 269 12 18 15 Rhode Island Corkery House, Caritas, Inc. 16 South Carolina Beaufort Marine Institute Camp White Pines Horizon Campus Juvenile Detention, North Charleston New Hope Carolinas 28 74 28 47 78 South Dakota Chamberlain Academy 68 Tennessee CCA, Shelby Co. Training Centerd,e 185 Texas Brazoria Co Juvenile Detention Center Colorado Co. Juvenile Boot Camp Dallas County Detention Center Denton Co Juvenile Detention Sandy Brook Residential Treatment Center Shelter Harbor (North, South, East, West) 21 97 243 42 27 44 Utah 712 East 25th Street Home Cinnamon Hills Youth Crisis Centerd,e County Residential Group Home, Springville Provo Canyon Salt Lake Valley Detention Center 12 126 51 220 116 Virginia Henrico Detention Home New Dominion School Newport News Juvenile Detentiona,c Tidewater Detention Home 19 101 75 68 Appendix table 6c (continued). Private and local juvenile facilities with no allegations of youth-on-youth sexual violence and staff sexual misconduct, 2004 Facility Washington Johnny Robinson Boys Home Pierce Co Juvenile Court Wisconsin Boys Shelter Care, Milwaukee Focus Unit, Milwaukee Home Youth Family Program, Wittenberg Milwaukee County Juvenile Detention Home Number of youth held on 12/31/2004 30 139 Facility Wyoming Crisis Center, Rock Springs Normative Services, Inc. Number of youth held on 12/31/2004 8 134 38 17 No response 64 Note: Facilities included in this table held 10,891 youth on December 31, 2004. - - Not reported. a Reports of nonconsensual sexual acts are not recorded in a central database. b Reports of staff sexual misconduct are not recorded in a central database. c Reports of abusive sexual contacts are not recorded in a central database. d Reports of staff sexual misconduct are limited to substantiated occurrences only. e Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to substantiated occurrences only. f Allegations of nonconsensual sexual acts are limited to completed occurrences only. Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2004 39