Skip navigation

Taser Lapd M26 Adv Taser Product Eval and Field Test Ppt

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
Los Angeles Police
Department
M26 ADVANCED TASER Product
Evaluation and Field Test
Officer Michael D. Hall
Tactics Training Unit
818/832-3769

Tactics Training Unit
16 Full Time Sworn Officers
„ 2 Full Time Sworn Supervisors
„ Responsible for training in-service and
recruit officers in tactics including
ambush attacks, vehicle pullovers,
crimes in progress, patrol techniques,
the use of deadly force, TASER and
shooting on the move.
„

Los Angeles Police Department

Approximately 8,400 sworn personnel
„ 3.8 million citizens living in Los Angeles
„ 18 Geographical Patrol Divisions
„

L.A.P.D. and TASER History
First began deploying TASERs in 1980
„ First major department nationwide to
deploy the original TASER with the line
officer as opposed to the supervisor.
„ Approximately 322 TASERs department
wide prior to product evaluation.
„ Last recent major purchase of TASERs
was in 1994
„

Reason for Product Evaluation
„ Cost

of repairs
„ Effectiveness of current TASER

Effectiveness of original LAPD
TASER prior to Product Evaluation
„

January 1997 through March 2000
– 44 deployments with 29 effective incidents
(66% effective)
– 0 injuries to suspects (other than puncture
wounds) when original TASER was effective
– 0 injuries to officers when TASER was effective
– Secondary injuries: 1 suspect; 1 officer
– 27% of officers and 40% of suspects injured
when TASER was ineffective and officers
resorted to other types of force

January 1997 through
December 2001
72 deployments with 41 effective
incidents (59% effective)
„ 0 injuries to officers or suspects (other
than puncture wounds) when the TASER
was effective
„ 39% of officers and 58% of suspects
injured when the original TASER was
ineffective and officers resorted to other
U.O.F. options
„

Narcotics and Mental Illness
90% effective on suspect’s under the
influence of alcohol
„ 67% effective on suspect’s under the
influence of PCP
„ 40% effective on suspect’s under the
influence of other narcotics
„ 71% effective on 5150 suspects
„ 67% effective on suspects under the
influence of any combination of the above
„

TASER Ineffectiveness prior to
M26 ADVANCED TASER
10 incidents one or both probes missed the
suspect or did not stick to suspect
„ 9 incidents due to narcotics
„ 6 incidents the suspect removed the probes.
„ 2 incidents due to suspect’s clothing
„ 1 incident, the officer stopped the flow of
energy to the suspect prematurely
„ 3 incidents the ineffectiveness was unknown
„

Noteworthy Original TASER
Deployments
Central Patrol Incident
„ Harbor Patrol Incident
„ S.W.A.T. Incident
„

Goal of Product Evaluation
„

Increase standoff distance between
officer and suspect while maintaining
accuracy

„

Reduce injuries to officers and suspects
involved in use of force incidents
therefore reducing city liability
– 2000 1746 U.O.F incidents resulted 33%
officers and 57% of suspects being injured

L.A.P.D. Policy
„

TASERs can be deployed on aggressive/
combative suspects when the following
condition exists;
– Deadly force does not appear to be justifiable
and/or necessary; and
– Attempts to subdue the suspect with other less
lethal tactics have been or will likely be
ineffective in the situation; and
– There is a reasonable expectation that it will be
unsafe for officers to approach within contact
range of the suspect

Testing
„

In-House Testing
– Accuracy
– Strength
– Laser sight/Ease of use

„

Outside Testing
– Scientific Investigation Division
– Los Angeles County Coroners Office
– Outside Departments

„

Field Test

M26 Accuracy
10’

15’

20’

16”

24 ½”

31”

Drop

1 ½”

3 ½”

9”

Effectiveness

100% 100% 95%

Spread

Competitor Results
Concerns Noted
Overall effectiveness beyond 15’
„ 5 neck shots, 3 head shots, and several
near misses to head
„ Numerous cartridges ejected from firing
bay during deployment
„ Numerous probes bouncing off the target
„ Several cartridges remained jammed in
firing bay after deployment
„

Strength Testing
Method
„ Test Participants
„ Results
„

– Competitor was 1/2 the strength of M26
– Several participants able to walk through
effects of competitor but were
immediately controlled with the M26

Laser Sight/Ease of Use
Method
„ Test Participants
„ Test
„

– 12’ deployment inside
– 12’ deployment outside with laser sights
– 12’ deployment outside without laser sights
„

Results

M26 Results
„

12’ deployment inside

–100% deployments
–All completed within 3 seconds

„

12’ deployment outside with laser sight
–100% deployments
–All completed within 3 seconds
–All found laser dot

„

12’ deployment outside w/o laser sight
–100% deployments
–All completed within 3 seconds
–Better accuracy without laser sights

Outside Testing
Scientific Investigation Division
„ Coroner
„ Outside Departments
„

– Mailed surveys
– Phone surveys

M26 Field Test
Training
„ Units/Divisions Assigned
„ Deployment
„ Results
„

M26 Results
19 reported uses with 15 effective
deployments (79%). Overall effectiveness
was 94% when officer error is removed
„ Breakdown
„

– 11 deployment of probes with 8 incidents
effective (73%)
– 7 of 7 incidents laser sight gained compliance
(100%)
– 1 “Touch Stun” incident reported with an
unsuccessful use

Ineffective Incidents
„

Probes Deployed
– 2 due to misses
– 1 incident suspect pulled probes out
– Without including missed probes, the
effectiveness improves to 89% compared
to Department’s original TASER which was
66%. (Not including missed probes)

„

“Touch Stun” Deployment
– Location of application and duration

Narcotics and Mental Illness
In 6 deployments, the suspect was 5150.
Their were 5 successful deployments
(83%). Original TASER was 71%
effective with 5150 suspects.
„ 2 deployments involved suspects under
the influence of narcotics and 5150. The
M26 was successful in both incidents
compared to the original TASER which
was 67% effective.
„

Deployments of Interest
Hollywood Incident
„ S.W.A.T. Incidents
„ 77th Incident
„ Metro Jail Incident
„

M26 vs. Original TASER
„

2001 Statistics (Probes deployed only)
– Original TASER
„ 16 deployments with 7 effective
incidents (44%)
– M26 ADVANCED TASER
„ 11 deployments with 8 effective
incidents (73%)

Lessons Learned
Rechargeable vs. alkaline batteries
„ Holsters
„ Training issues
„

– Touch stun
– Close quarter deployments
– “Going hands-on”
– Effectiveness vs. ineffectiveness

L.A.P.D. Deployment
Equipment Purchased
„ Recruit Training
„ Location deployed
„ Current Statistics
„

„

Written documents such as lesson plans,
training bulletins, etc. or the training video
produced by the L.A.P.D. can be obtained by
writing your request on department
letterhead to:

Captain Sergio Diaz
Los Angeles Police Department
5651 W. Manchester Blvd.
Los Angeles, Ca. 90045
(310) 342-3010